Submit to Antibiotics Review for Antibiotics Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Antibiotics Use in Primary Care

Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Keywords
Published Papers

A special issue of Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382). This special issue belongs to the section "Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Stewardship".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 50172

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Gloria Córdoba

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Interests: use of antibiotics; primary care; One Health; quality improvement

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics are the most important causes of the increasing development and spread of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). Worldwide, the majority of antibiotics are used in primary care. Hence, optimizing the use of antibiotics in primary care is crucial to control the AMR problem. This special issue seeks scientific contributions that can improve our understanding of antibiotic use in primary care and the complex relationship between healthcare professionals, patients and contextual factors. We welcome contributions based on both qualitative and/or quantitative methods and we hope to receive manuscripts from a broad spectrum of geographical, cultural, and economic settings.

I would like to invite you to submit manuscripts covering the following areas:

Clinical decision-making in patients with suspected infectious diseases (e.g., communication, shared decision-making, use of point-of-care testing, benefits and problems of long vs. short treatment courses, benefits and problems of antibiotics vs. other management strategies)
Behavior change related to antibiotic prescribing, dispensing practices and demand for antibiotics (e.g., development/implementation of quality indicators, interventions and theories targeting patients and health care professionals)
Structures, policies, and regulations related to prescribing of antibiotic (e.g., development and implementation of guidelines, analyses of factors determining the use of antibiotics in different contexts)
Inter-professional collaboration (e.g. analyses and interventions promoting collaborative work between general practitioners, dentists, pharmacists, and nurses)

Dr. Gloria Córdoba
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Antibiotics is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

Antibiotics
point-of-care-test
share decision-making
quality improvement
behaviour change
family medicin
General Practice
dentist
pharmacist
nurses

Published Papers (13 papers)

Download All Papers

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

4 pages, 189 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

Editorial: Antibiotics Special Issue on the Use of Antibiotics in Primary Care

by Gloria Cordoba

Antibiotics 2021, 10(9), 1083; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091083 - 8 Sep 2021

Viewed by 1552

Abstract

For many decades, the importance of increasing knowledge on the rational use of antibiotics has not been given the priority it deserves [...] Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

13 pages, 257 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Barriers of Appropriate Antibiotic Prescription at PHCC in Qatar: Perspective of Physicians and Pharmacists

by Nahla Sharaf, Ghadir Fakhri Al-Jayyousi, Eman Radwan, Shimous Mohamed Elamin Shams Eldin, Dhouha Hamdani, Huda Al-Katheeri, Khalid Elawad and Anjum Habib Sair

Antibiotics 2021, 10(3), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030317 - 19 Mar 2021

Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2709

Abstract

The Ministry of Public Health in Qatar developed the NAP (National Action Plan to combat Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in collaboration with WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (WHO/EMRO). Among the major factors shaping AMR is antimicrobial prescribing and use. Tailoring Antimicrobial Resistance Program is a behavior change methodology that is utilized to adapt behavior change in relation to antimicrobial use. This study explores barriers of appropriate antibiotic (AB) prescription from the physicians’ and pharmacists’ perspectives at primary healthcare centers in Qatar. Data were collected from 50 participants across two PHCCs: 30 physicians and 20 pharmacists. Two different interview guides were constructed: One for physicians and one for pharmacists. In-depth, face-to-face, five focus groups were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Inductive qualitative analysis, involving discovering the themes in the interviews, was followed. Data were analyzed using constant comparative techniques. The Major themes arose from the analysis revealed that patients, practitioners mainly physicians, and the organization itself, played a role in shaping these barriers in the two primary healthcare centers. The findings would help develop and pilot behavior change interventions among patients, physicians and pharmacists with the aim of optimizing appropriate antibiotic prescription and use, which would support the implementation of the antibiotic stewardship program. Effective behavior change interventions should consider multiple factors including individual and organizational factors to optimize appropriate antibiotic prescription. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

9 pages, 745 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Quality of the Diagnostic Process, Treatment Decision, and Predictors for Antibiotic Use in General Practice for Nursing Home Residents with Suspected Urinary Tract Infection

by Stine Dyhl Sommer-Larsen, Sif Helene Arnold, Anne Holm, Julie Aamand Olesen and Gloria Cordoba

Antibiotics 2021, 10(3), 316; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030316 - 18 Mar 2021

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2178

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in nursing home (NH) residents and Denmark is one of the countries with the highest antibiotic use in NHs. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of the diagnostic process and treatment decision on the day of the first contact from NHs to general practice and assess predictors for prescription of antibiotics in NH residents without an indwelling urinary catheter. The study was a prospective observational study in general practice in the Capital Region of Denmark; 490 patients were included; 158 out of 394 (40.1%, 95% CI 35; 45) patients with suspected UTI had urinary tract symptoms; 270 out of 296 (91.2%, 95% CI 87; 94) patients without urinary tract symptoms had a urine culture performed. Performing urine culture in the general practice was inversely associated to prescription of antibiotics on day one (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13; 0.56). It is imperative to support the implementation of interventions aimed at improving the quality of the diagnostic process on day one, as less than half of the patients given the diagnosis “suspected UTI” had urinary tract symptoms, and most patients without urinary tract symptoms had a urine culture performed. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

13 pages, 1167 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Antibiotics’ Use in Thailand: Community Pharmacists’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices

by Budh Siltrakool, Ilhem Berrou, David Griffiths and Saleh Alghamdi

Antibiotics 2021, 10(2), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020137 - 31 Jan 2021

Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6881

Abstract

Thailand spends $203 million on antibiotics every year, and patients can still access antimicrobials over the counter without a prescription. Community pharmacy plays a pivotal role in improving access and ensuring the appropriate use of antimicrobials. However, little is known about current practices in this setting. This study aims to assess Thai community pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding antimicrobials’ use and resistance. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Bangkok and Chonburi province in 2017 using an online self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was completed by 372 community pharmacists (71.4% response rate). The most commonly encountered infections in the community were upper and lower respiratory tract infections. The most commonly dispensed antimicrobials were broad-spectrum antibiotics including aminopenicillins and fluoroquinolones. Thai pharmacists have a good knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding antimicrobials’ use and resistance. They dispense anti-microbials in line with local guidelines, although international guidelines may not indicate anti-biotics for viral self-limiting infections. While community pharmacy in Thailand could be the most accessible healthcare resource for patients, inappropriate provision of antimicrobials for self-limiting viral infections by pharmacists will increase antimicrobial resistance. This highlights the need for updated guidance and improved pharmacists’ training. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 301 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Divergent and Convergent Attitudes and Views of General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists to Collaboratively Implement Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Australia: A Nationwide Study

by Sajal K. Saha, David C. M. Kong, Karin Thursky and Danielle Mazza

Antibiotics 2021, 10(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010047 - 5 Jan 2021

Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3590

Abstract

Setting up an interprofessional team for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) to improve the quality and safety of antimicrobial use in primary care is essential but challenging. This study aimed to investigate the convergent and divergent attitudes and views of general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) about AMS implementation and their perceived challenges of collaboration to design a GP–pharmacist collaborative AMS (GPPAS) model. Nationwide surveys of GPs and CPs across Australia were conducted January-October 2019. Chi square statistics and a theoretical framework were used for comparative analyses of quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. In total, 999 participants responded to the surveys with 15.4% (n = 386) response rates for GPs and 30.7% (n = 613) for CPs. GPs and CPs were aware about AMS however their interprofessional perceptions varied to the benefits of AMS programs. CPs indicated that they would need AMS training; significantly higher than GPs (GP vs. CP; 46.4% vs. 76.5%; p < 0.0001). GPs’ use of the Therapeutic Guideline Antibiotic was much higher than CPs (83.2% vs. 45.5%; p < 0.0001). No interprofessional difference was found in the very-limited use of patient information leaflets (p < 0.1162) and point-of-care tests (p < 0.7848). While CPs were more willing (p < 0.0001) to collaborate with GPs, both groups were convergent in views that policies that support GP–CP collaboration are needed to implement GPPAS strategies. GP–pharmacist collaborative group meetings (54.9% vs. 82.5%) and antimicrobial audit (46.1% vs. 86.5%) models were inter-professionally supported to optimise antimicrobial therapy, but an attitudinal divergence was significant (p < 0.001). The challenges towards GP–CP collaboration in AMS were identified by both at personal, logistical and organisational environment level. There are opportunities for GP–CP collaboration to improve AMS in Australian primary care. However, strengthening GP–pharmacy collaborative system structure and practice agreements is a priority to improve interprofessional trust, competencies, and communications for AMS and to establish a GPPAS model in future. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

20 pages, 1608 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Fostering Appropriate Antibiotic Use in a Complex Intervention: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation Alongside the Cluster-Randomized Trial ARena

by Regina Poss-Doering, Lukas Kühn, Martina Kamradt, Anna Stürmlinger, Katharina Glassen, Edith Andres, Petra Kaufmann-Kolle, Veit Wambach, Lutz Bader, Joachim Szecsenyi and Michel Wensing

Antibiotics 2020, 9(12), 878; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120878 - 8 Dec 2020

Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3913

Abstract

The cluster randomized trial ARena (sustainable reduction of antibiotic-induced antimicrobial resistance, 2017–2020) promoted appropriate use of antibiotics for acute non-complicated infections in primary care networks (PCNs) in Germany. A process evaluation assessed determinants of practice and explored factors associated with antibiotic prescribing patterns. This work describes its findings on uptake and impacts of the complex intervention program and indicates potential implementation into routine care. In a nested mixed-methods approach, a three-wave study-specific survey for participating physicians and medical assistants assessed potential impacts and uptake of the complex intervention program. Stakeholders received a one-time online questionnaire to reflect on network-related aspects. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews, with a purposive sample of physicians, medical assistants and stakeholders, explored program component acceptance for daily practice and perceived sustainability of intervention component effects. Intervention components were perceived to be smoothly integrable into practice routines. The highest uptake was reported for educational components: feedback reports, background information, e-learning modules and disease-specific quality circles (QCs). Participation in PCNs was seen as the motivational factor for guideline-oriented patient care and adoption of new routines. Future approaches to fostering appropriate antibiotics use by targeting health literacy competencies and clinician’s therapy decisions should combine evidence-based information sources, audit and feedback reports and QCs. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 775 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Social and Contextual Influences on Antibiotic Prescribing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Study with Clinical Commissioning Group and General Practice Professionals

by Aleksandra J. Borek, Sibyl Anthierens, Rosalie Allison, Cliodna A. M. Mcnulty, Philip E. Anyanwu, Ceire Costelloe, Ann Sarah Walker, Christopher C. Butler, Sarah Tonkin-Crine and on behalf of the STEP-UP Study Team

Antibiotics 2020, 9(12), 859; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120859 - 1 Dec 2020

Cited by 23 | Viewed by 5126

Abstract

Antibiotic prescribing in England varies considerably between Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and general practices. We aimed to assess social and contextual factors affecting antibiotic prescribing and engagement with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 22 CCG professionals and 19 general practice professionals. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Social/contextual influences were grouped into the following four categories: (1) Immediate context, i.e., patients’ social characteristics (e.g., deprivation and culture), clinical factors, and practice and clinician characteristics (e.g., “struggling” with staff shortage/turnover) were linked to higher prescribing. (2) Wider context, i.e., pressures on the healthcare system, limited resources, and competing priorities were seen to reduce engagement with AMS. (3) Collaborative and whole system approaches, i.e., communication, multidisciplinary networks, leadership, and teamwork facilitated prioritizing AMS, learning, and consistency. (4) Relativity of appropriate prescribing, i.e., “high” or “appropriate” prescribing was perceived as relative, depending on comparators, and disregarding different contexts, but social norms around antibiotic use among professionals and patients seemed to be changing. Further optimization of antibiotic prescribing would benefit from addressing social/contextual factors and addressing wider health inequalities, not only targeting individual clinicians. Tailoring and adapting to local contexts and constraints, ensuring adequate time and resources for AMS, and collaborative, whole system approaches to promote consistency may help promote AMS. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2165 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Time Trends and Factors Associated with Antibiotic Prescribing in Swiss Primary Care (2008 to 2020)

by Nahara Anani Martínez-González, Stefania Di Gangi, Giuseppe Pichierri, Stefan Neuner-Jehle, Oliver Senn and Andreas Plate

Antibiotics 2020, 9(11), 837; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110837 - 23 Nov 2020

Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3317

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is a major threat to public health, and the majority of antibiotics are prescribed in the outpatient setting, especially in primary care. Monitoring antibiotic consumption is one key measure in containing ABR, but Swiss national surveillance data are limited. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study to characterise the patterns of antibiotic prescriptions, assess the time trends, and identify the factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in Swiss primary care. Using electronic medical records data, we analysed 206,599 antibiotic prescriptions from 112,378 patients. Based on 27,829 patient records, respiratory (52.1%), urinary (27.9%), and skin (4.8%) infections were the commonest clinical indications for antibiotic prescribing. The most frequently prescribed antibiotics were broad-spectrum penicillins (BSP) (36.5%), fluoroquinolones (16.4%), and macrolides/lincosamides (13.8%). Based on the WHO AWaRe classification, antibiotics were 57.9% Core-Access and 41.7% Watch, 69% of which were fluoroquinolones and macrolides. Between 2008 and 2020, fluoroquinolones and macrolides/lincosamides prescriptions significantly declined by 53% and 51%; BSP prescriptions significantly increased by 54%. Increasing patients’ age, volume, and employment level were significantly associated with antibiotic prescribing. Our results may inform future antibiotic stewardship interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 208 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Practice-Level Association between Antibiotic Prescribing and Resistance: An Observational Study in Primary Care

by Dylan Batenburg, Theo Verheij, Annemarie van’t Veen and Alike van der Velden

Antibiotics 2020, 9(8), 470; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9080470 - 1 Aug 2020

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2375

Abstract

A direct relation between antibiotic use and resistance has been shown at country level. We aim to investigate the association between antibiotic prescribing for patients from individual Dutch primary care practices and antibiotic resistance of bacterial isolates from routinely submitted urine samples from their patient populations. Practices’ antibiotic prescribing data were obtained from the Julius Network and related to numbers of registered patients. Practices were classified as low-, middle- or high-prescribers and from each group size-matching practices were chosen. Culture and susceptibility data from submitted urine samples were obtained from the microbiology laboratory. Percentages of resistant isolates, and resistant isolates per 1000 registered patients per year (population resistance) were calculated and compared between the groups. The percentages of resistant Escherichia coli varied considerably between individual practices, but the three prescribing groups’ means were very similar. However, as the higher-prescribing practices requested more urine cultures per 1000 registered patients, population resistance was markedly higher in the higher-prescribing groups. This study showed that the highly variable resistance percentages for individual practices were unrelated to antibiotic prescribing levels. However, population resistance (resistant strains per practice population) was related to antibiotic prescribing levels, which was shown to coincide with numbers of urine culture requests. Whether more urine culture requests in the higher-prescribing groups were related to treatment failures, more complex patient populations, or to general practitioners’ testing behaviour needs further investigation. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

17 pages, 363 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Policies to Reduce Antibiotic Consumption: The Impact in the Basque Country

by Paula Rojas and Fernando Antoñanzas

Antibiotics 2020, 9(7), 423; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9070423 - 19 Jul 2020

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2186

Abstract

In 2013, a change in copayment rate was introduced in the Basque Country (one year later than in the other regions in Spain), and improvements were made to drug packaging. In 2014, a National Program Against Bacterial Resistance (Spanish abbreviation: PRAN) was approved. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of change to the copayment rate, the adjustment of drug packaging, and the approval of PRAN on the consumption of antibiotics. Raw monthly data on the consumption of antibiotics (costs, packages, and daily defined doses per thousand people (DID)) were collected from January 2009 to December 2018 in the Basque Country. Counterfactual and intervention analysis (Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model) was performed for the total series, disaggregated by group of antibiotics (2019 WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) Classification) and active substances with the highest cost per prescription (cefditoren and moxifloxacin), the lowest cost per prescription (doxycycline and cloxacillin), and the most prescribed active ingredients (amoxicillin, azithromycin, and levofloxacin). Introduction of copayment led to a ‘stockpiling effect’ one month before its implementation, equal to 8% in the three consumption series analyzed. Only the adjustment of drug packaging significantly reduced the number of packages dispensed (−12.19%). PRAN approval reduced consumption by 0.779 DID (−4.51%), representing a significant decrease for both ’access’ and ’watch’ group antibiotics. Despite the delay in implementing changes to copayment, there was a ‘stockpiling effect’. With the adjustment of packaging, fewer packs were prescribed but with a higher drug load and price. PRAN approval reduced both the consumption of ’access group antibiotics’ (first-line treatment) and ’watch group antibiotics’ (second-line treatment). Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

► Show Figures

Figure A1

5 pages, 195 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Nitrofurantoin Failure in Elderly Men: A Retrospective Observational Study

by Ilse Wolterink, Theo Verheij, Tamara Platteel, Ann van den Bruel, Arjen Stam and Alma van de Pol

Antibiotics 2020, 9(5), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9050211 - 27 Apr 2020

Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3077

Abstract

Urinary tract infections in the elderly are common. Treatment with nitrofurantoin in men may not be sufficient if concomitant tissue involvement is present, resulting in treatment failure. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of nitrofurantoin failure in the elderly, and to assess the effect of gender and age. A retrospective observational study was conducted using a Dutch general practice medical record database of 21,789 men and 26,622 women aged 65 years or older in 2015. First, nitrofurantoin prescriptions in 2015 were analyzed. Nitrofurantoin failure (subsequent prescription of antibiotic within 30 days) for men, women, and different age categories were compared. The effect of age and gender was assessed using multivariate logistic regression. A total of 3537 patients had a first nitrofurantoin prescription in 2015; 506 men and 3031 women. Overall, 584 patients (17%) experienced nitrofurantoin failure; 135 (27%) men and 449 (15%) women. Male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68–2.61) and age (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03) was associated with higher treatment failure. Our findings indicate that in a substantial number of elderly men, nitrofurantoin might not be the appropriate treatment. Nitrofurantoin, as a first choice in elderly men with urinary tract infections, should be reconsidered. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

11 pages, 680 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Understanding General Practitioners’ Antibiotic Prescribing Decisions in Out-of-Hours Primary Care: A Video-Elicitation Interview Study

by Annelies Colliers, Samuel Coenen, Katrien Bombeke, Roy Remmen, Hilde Philips and Sibyl Anthierens

Antibiotics 2020, 9(3), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9030115 - 7 Mar 2020

Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3948

Abstract

Infections are the most common reason why patients consult out-of-hours (OOH) primary care. Too often there is an overprescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting infections and general practitioners (GPs) do not always choose the guideline recommended antibiotics. To improve antibiotic prescribing quality, a better understanding is needed of the (non) antibiotic prescribing decisions of GPs. This study sets out to unravel GPs’ (non) antibiotic prescribing decisions in OOH primary care. We video-recorded 160 consultations on infections during OOH primary care by 21 GPs and performed video-elicitation interviews with each GP. GPs reflected on their decision-making process and communication while watching their consultation. A qualitative thematic analysis was used. GPs found that their (non) antibiotic prescribing decision-making was not only based on objective arguments, but also subconsciously influenced by their own interpretation of information. Often GPs made assumptions (about for example the patients’ reason for encounter or expectations for antibiotics) without objectifying or verifying this with the patient. From the beginning of the consultation GPs follow a dichotomous thinking process: urgent versus not urgent, viral versus bacterial, antibiotics versus no antibiotics. Safety-netting is an important but difficult tool in the OOH care context, with no long-term follow-up or relationship with the patient. GPs talk about strategies they use to talk about diagnostic uncertainty, what patients can expect or should do when things do not improve and the difficulties they encounter while doing this. This video- elicitation interview study provides actionable insights in GPs’ (non) antibiotic prescribing decisions during OOH consultations on infections. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

16 pages, 1110 KiB

Open AccessReview

Short- vs. Long-Course Antibiotic Treatment for Acute Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

by Anna Engell Holm, Carl Llor, Lars Bjerrum and Gloria Cordoba

Antibiotics 2020, 9(11), 733; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110733 - 26 Oct 2020

Cited by 11 | Viewed by 8265

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of short courses of antibiotic therapy for patients with acute streptococcal pharyngitis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing short-course antibiotic therapy (≤5 days) with long-course antibiotic therapy (≥7 days) for patients with streptococcal pharyngitis were included. Two primary outcomes: early clinical cure and early bacterial eradication. RESULTS: Fifty randomized clinical trials were included. Overall, short-course antibiotic treatment was as effective as long-course antibiotic treatment for early clinical cure (odds ratio (OR) 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.15). Subgroup analysis showed that short-course penicillin was less effective for early clinical cure (OR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.82) and bacteriological eradication (OR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.61) in comparison to long-course penicillin. Short-course macrolides were equally effective, compared to long-course penicillin. Finally, short-course cephalosporin was more effective for early clinical cure (OR 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.96) and early microbiological cure (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.27) in comparison to long-course penicillin. In total, 1211 (17.7%) participants assigned to short-course antibiotic therapy, and 893 (12.3%) cases assigned to long-course, developed adverse events (OR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.68). CONCLUSIONS: Macrolides and cephalosporins belong to the list of “Highest Priority Critically Important Antimicrobials”; hence, long-course penicillin V should remain as the first line antibiotic for the management of patients with streptococcal pharyngitis as far as the benefits of using these two types of antibiotics do not outweigh the harms of their unnecessary use. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Primary Care)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Antibiotics Use in Primary Care

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Published Papers (13 papers)

Editorial

Research

Review

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI