Creativity in Architecture

A special issue of Buildings (ISSN 2075-5309). This special issue belongs to the section "Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2024 | Viewed by 3160

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Design and Computer Graphics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
Interests: artificial intelligence; architectural design; creativity and innovation; design theory; visual communication; computer ontology; computer games; art and science
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will be devoted to the search for architectural designs that are distinguished by their quality and originality, and built to become points of reference.  There will be a focus on the relationship between designer and computational creativity, understood as the use of a computer to generate results that could be considered creative if produced solely by humans.

A designer's creativity is related to cognitive processes such as perception, conceptual thinking, remembering and reflective self-criticism. A designer's visual thinking about familiar objects evolves and transforms them into something new and different, related to a sought-after new artifact. Designers may create mental images in their minds during the design process; however, the vast majority of them present these images in an external form. Thus, creative visual design aided by the computer is the dialogue between the designer and the artifact being created that is supported by computational creativity represented, for example, by multi-agent methodology, neural networks or evolutionary design. This dialogue is a key factor in understanding the constructive power of perception, which has implications for creative design, and shows the differences between designer and computational creativity, highlighting the advantage of the former.

The purpose of this Special Issue is to familiarize readers with the current topics related to creativity in architecture.

Prof. Dr. Ewa Janina Grabska
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Buildings is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • designer creativity
  • computational creativity
  • CAAD
  • visual perception
  • computer ontology

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

21 pages, 55594 KiB  
Article
Spatial Silhouette: A Study on the Creation Strategy of Strong Bamboo Architecture with “Negative Space” as the Main Feature—A Case Study of Phu Quoc Island Visitor Centre, Vietnam
by Chaoxian Li, Jiaojiao Ma and Xiaoming Gao
Buildings 2024, 14(4), 1172; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14041172 - 21 Apr 2024
Viewed by 399
Abstract
The Gestalt theory of mental completeness in architecture gave rise to the ideas of “positive space” and “negative space”. This research digs into the sturdy structural building process of bamboo architecture, which is essentially distinguished by “negative space”. It examines how bamboo is [...] Read more.
The Gestalt theory of mental completeness in architecture gave rise to the ideas of “positive space” and “negative space”. This research digs into the sturdy structural building process of bamboo architecture, which is essentially distinguished by “negative space”. It examines how bamboo is articulated in architectural space, while attempting to establish a balance between form and structure, with the goal of discovering the current value and spiritual position that bamboo in architecture represents. Using the Phu Quoc Island Visitor Center in Vietnam as an example, we introduce the strong structure concept and examine its design process in terms of spatial operation technique and strong structural expression logic. The fundamental strategy for creating bamboo architecture under this concept is to take the lead in negative space design and use the material capabilities of bamboo to build structural space prototypes. This further encourages the use of green building materials and offers architects working with bamboo a reference. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creativity in Architecture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4356 KiB  
Article
Embodied Carbon Premium for Cantilevers
by James Helal, Dario Trabucco, David Ruggiero, Paola Miglietta and Giovanni Perrucci
Buildings 2024, 14(4), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040871 - 23 Mar 2024
Viewed by 815
Abstract
This study addresses the critical need for sustainable architectural designs within the context of climate change and the significant role the built environment plays in greenhouse gas emissions. The focus of this paper is on understanding the influence of unbalanced cantilevers on the [...] Read more.
This study addresses the critical need for sustainable architectural designs within the context of climate change and the significant role the built environment plays in greenhouse gas emissions. The focus of this paper is on understanding the influence of unbalanced cantilevers on the embodied carbon of structural systems in buildings, a subject that has, until now, remained underexplored despite its importance in architectural innovation and environmental sustainability. Employing a case study approach, the Melbourne School of Design (MSD) building serves as a primary example to assess the embodied carbon implications of cantilevered versus supported structures. The methodological framework encompasses a comparative embodied carbon assessment utilising an input–output-based hybrid life cycle inventory analysis approach. The findings reveal that unbalanced cantilevers in buildings, exemplified by the MSD building, can lead to a 10% increase in embodied carbon compared to alternative designs incorporating supporting columns. Such findings underscore the environmental premium for cantilevers, prompting a re-evaluation of design practices towards minimising embodied carbon. Through this investigation, the research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable construction practices, offering valuable insights for both design practitioners and educators in the pursuit of improving the environmental performance of the built environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creativity in Architecture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 164434 KiB  
Article
Integrating an Image-Generative Tool on Creative Design Brainstorming Process of a Safavid Mosque Architecture Conceptual Form
by Aref Maksoud, Aya Elshabshiri, Amani Saeed Hilal Humaid Alzaabi and Aseel Hussien
Buildings 2024, 14(3), 843; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030843 - 21 Mar 2024
Viewed by 678
Abstract
The study aims to understand to what extent employing A.I. image-generative tools in architectural concept brainstorming demonstrates effectiveness, accuracy, and adherence to text and image inputs, and evaluate the utilization of A.I. image-generative tools in the architectural ideation phase, considering factors such as [...] Read more.
The study aims to understand to what extent employing A.I. image-generative tools in architectural concept brainstorming demonstrates effectiveness, accuracy, and adherence to text and image inputs, and evaluate the utilization of A.I. image-generative tools in the architectural ideation phase, considering factors such as speed, creativity, and accuracy. Thus, this study will investigate using an A.I. image-generative tool, Midjourney, in the creative brainstorming stage for a Safavid mosque architectural form design process. The study will quantitatively evaluate the form proportions of mosques generated by Midjourney based on certain criteria as they pertain to the Shah Mosque as the inspiration for the design as it encompasses many of the Safavid Mosque’s typical elements and characteristics. The most matching form will then be found. The findings are that Midjourney is reliable in terms of its speed and creativity; however, it lacks accuracy and adherence to inputs. This study is essential as limited literature exists on A.I. image-generative tools in the brainstorming process of architectural projects, particularly mosque architecture. It also provides architects and designers with a framework and the pros and cons of the use of A.I. generative tools, such as Midjourney, in the ideation process for an architectural project. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creativity in Architecture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

27 pages, 10272 KiB  
Review
Enhancing Sustainable Railway Station Design in Tropical Climates: Insights from Thailand’s Architectural Theses and Case Studies
by Suppapon Tetiranont, Wannapol Sadakorn, Napong Tao Rugkhapan and Lapyote Prasittisopin
Buildings 2024, 14(3), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030829 - 19 Mar 2024
Viewed by 843
Abstract
An environmentally conscious architectural design of a railway station can have a substantial influence on government spending. Nevertheless, an extensive collection of guidelines for using sustainable design principles in the construction of a railway station can provide several advantages. The goal is to [...] Read more.
An environmentally conscious architectural design of a railway station can have a substantial influence on government spending. Nevertheless, an extensive collection of guidelines for using sustainable design principles in the construction of a railway station can provide several advantages. The goal is to review design visions for railway stations in Thailand, as reflected in student theses and government proposals, from 1983 to 2022 for sustainable design aspects in tropical climates. We perform an analysis of architectural design aspects including service areas, shape, entrances, roofing, style, and development in order to uncover design trends and possible areas that may be enhanced. Station designs are mostly characterized by curved and gable roofs, with 3D curved buildings being the next most common feature. High speed rail (HSR) stations stress local cultural elements in their major entrances while also improving passenger flow. Public buildings frequently employ curved or gabled porticos to achieve a majestic look. Although university theses place a high importance on conceptual design and functionality, it is essential to also consider cost-effectiveness. Key design considerations for future railway stations are transparency, connection, efficient mobility, and cost–time efficiency. The research uncovers deficiencies in user-centered design for thermal comfort and inclusiveness (design-for-all) in Thailand’s tropical environment. Addressing these aspects is critical for future sustainable railway station design evaluations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creativity in Architecture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop