Collective Action to Improve Schools and Redesign Education Systems

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Curriculum and Instruction".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2022) | Viewed by 15094

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Welfare & Department of Education Policy and Leadership, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA
Interests: new designs for schools; complex partnerships; interprofessional education; community development; theories of change to address poverty & social exclusion; systems change
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Interests: school-community collaboration; positive youth development; out-of-school time; educational equity and social justice

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Manchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Interests: local area strategies to tackle educational disadvantage

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Educational Administration, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
Interests: My research uses qualitative methods to investigate educational leadership and school-community partnerships, particularly in the context of rural communities. My recent research combines organizational change theory with concepts from political science to understand how individuals, groups, and organizations mobilize and develop shared understandings that shape collective action at the school and community levels

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Throughout the world, there are increasing challenges to inherited models for schools as specialized institutions which are accountable only for academic learning and achievement. These challenges originate from three mass migration patterns associated with the multi-faceted process of globalization: (1) movements of individuals and families from rural areas to cities; (2) cross-border migration from one nation to another; and (3) migration from cities to inner ring suburbs and nearby rural communities. These population shifts present formidable challenges to schools located in rural areas that are losing families and also to schools located in inner ring suburbs and urban neighbohoods, which are known as “arrival cities” because migrants and immigrants cluster in these places. Challenges start with students who do not arrive at the schoolhouse doors “ready and able to learn”, and they include persistent difficulties in recruiting and retaining a high-quality education workforce.

The COVID-19 global pandemic has presented additional challenges to these special places and their constituent schools. However, this situation has given rise to timely opportunities associated with digital-age instructional and learning technologies, also drawing attention to innovative configurations that connect schools, families, community centers, and libraries. Notwithstanding the challenges associated with “digital divides” and “digital deserts”—places where shortages of facilities and equipment are normative—remote instruction and expansive opportunities for self-directed, online learning reminds us that, although education systems include schools, they also transcend what schools prioritize and accomplish. Imperatives for innovative education systems are growing with priorities for life-long learning, especially as adults routinely change jobs and careers.

The situation worldwide thus might be summarized as follows. While improvement initiatives are evident everywhere, including digital-age teaching and learning innovations, some initiatives which reproduce the inherited schooling system are not fit for purpose in places where poverty, social exclusion, and social isolation are clustered. 

In response to this need, innovative designs for education systems, some of which include new models for schools, are being piloted. Some such models, known as multi-service schools, community schools, and schools as community learning centers, are already being scaled up, together with policy innovations and partnerships with community agencies and higher education institutions. More than technical innovations, these new initiatives are founded on important core values involving equity, inclusion, and education’s roles in democracy.

Framed by the above context, this Special Issue is focused on important innovations of two kinds: (1) those described as improvement initiatives, especially ones founded on improvement in science; and (2) those offered as redesign initiatives, particularly those that provide reminders that education and learning systems transcend schooling. Authors are encouraged to “tell their respective stories”, i.e., provide salient details about the specifications for the new design(s), including indicators of need and opportunity, descriptions of the consequential choices they have made, and justifications for timely innovations. 

Together, the articles in this Special Issue will provide an innovation-focused map with an action-oriented compass for 21st-century schools and education systems. Leaders for improvement of schools and leaders for new education system designs will be served, particularly as relations between these two agendas are identified, described, and justified.

This Special Issue provides a more expansive framework than the ones dominating the current literature. For example, it features globalization’s challenges, needs, and opportunities, alongside the innovations and new demands associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prof. Dr. Hal A. Lawson
Prof. Dr. Dawn Anderson-Butcher
Dr. Kirstin Kerr
Dr. Sarah J. Zuckerman
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • improvement science
  • implementation science
  • institutional redesign
  • systems change
  • school innovations
  • digital age learning systems
  • collective impact
  • complex partnerships
  • equitable education

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

21 pages, 855 KiB  
Article
Advancing Educational Equity Research, Policy, and Practice
by Kristen Campbell Wilcox and Hal A. Lawson
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(12), 894; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120894 - 06 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4371
Abstract
As student populations worldwide become more diverse and many are challenged by poverty and social exclusion, educational equity’s importance grows, both as a core value and as a driver for school improvement and redesign. While national and local policies vary, as do resources [...] Read more.
As student populations worldwide become more diverse and many are challenged by poverty and social exclusion, educational equity’s importance grows, both as a core value and as a driver for school improvement and redesign. While national and local policies vary, as do resources in support of equity outcomes, it is timely to identify, synthesize, and evaluate the available research with special attention to commonalities, similarities, and lessons learned. Mindful of selectivity, we summarize eighteen years’ worth of equity-focused research and development conducted under the sponsorship of a state-funded initiative in the USA called NYKids. Utilizing practice-embedded research methodologies, research teams have identified, described, and interpreted seven keynote features of equity-oriented schools. They also have implemented research-practice partnerships that facilitate equity-oriented school improvement. This holistic, evidence-based, and practice-centered approach can be classified as “a strong equity approach”, albeit a selective one, when alternatives worldwide are surveyed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Collective Action to Improve Schools and Redesign Education Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 270 KiB  
Article
Promoting Equity in Market-Driven Education Systems: Lessons from England
by Kirstin Kerr and Mel Ainscow
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(7), 495; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070495 - 18 Jul 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3015
Abstract
There is a global trend towards the use of market-driven approaches as a strategy for educational reform. However, this is creating new barriers to the promotion of equity in some countries. Focusing on England as an extreme example of this approach, this paper [...] Read more.
There is a global trend towards the use of market-driven approaches as a strategy for educational reform. However, this is creating new barriers to the promotion of equity in some countries. Focusing on England as an extreme example of this approach, this paper points to some possibilities for addressing this concern. It reports findings from a series of studies in high poverty contexts in England. These studies have typically involved local educational practitioners and university researchers working together in ways designed to support equitable developments. Lessons from these experiences are identified for market-driven systems internationally. They suggest that to create more equitable arrangements, schools need to work together, and with other organizations, both within and beyond their local areas. They also point to the value of surfacing and using the rich experiential and contextualized knowledge held by practitioners to inform these collaborative developments. Acting on these lessons would mark a significant shift for systems whose current emphasis is on schools working competitively and in isolation, often to the detriment of disadvantaged children and young people. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Collective Action to Improve Schools and Redesign Education Systems)

Other

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 687 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Community Collaboration Model for School Improvement: A Scoping Review
by Dawn Anderson-Butcher, Samantha Bates, Hal A. Lawson, Tasha M. Childs and Aidyn L. Iachini
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(12), 918; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120918 - 14 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 6941
Abstract
Schools worldwide are developing innovative models in response to, and in anticipation of, societal changes. Aiming to address non-academic barriers to learning, while capitalizing on out-of-school time, some school and community leaders have prioritized family and community partnerships, especially in the United States [...] Read more.
Schools worldwide are developing innovative models in response to, and in anticipation of, societal changes. Aiming to address non-academic barriers to learning, while capitalizing on out-of-school time, some school and community leaders have prioritized family and community partnerships, especially in the United States (U.S.). The Community Collaboration Model (CCM) is one such U.S. partnership-oriented model of expanded school improvement. In contrast to some partnership-oriented models, the CCM prioritizes improvements in classrooms and communities, aiming to support students, assist teachers, and improve relationships beyond the typical school day. This scoping review examines 14 peer-reviewed articles which describe CCM-centered innovations and documented outcomes. Barriers and facilitators associated with CCM adoption and implementation in diverse U.S. school and community settings also are explored. CCM’s contributions to important student and school outcomes (e.g., increased access to mental health services, improved school climate, decreased discipline referrals) are documented in this scoping review. Some researchers have also described implementation-related facilitators (e.g., partnerships with universities) and barriers (e.g., initial resistance by educators) that influence the utility of the model in practice. Drawing on prior research, the authors discuss findings and implications for future research, educational policy, and practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Collective Action to Improve Schools and Redesign Education Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop