Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology and Cultural Heritage

A special issue of Heritage (ISSN 2571-9408). This special issue belongs to the section "Cultural Heritage".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2022) | Viewed by 7912

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Endangered Archaeology in the Middle East & North Africa (EAMENA), School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 2 South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will examine the archaeology of past hunter–gatherers. Hunting and gathering is often described as the way of life that made up 99% of our past, making this category of archaeology vastly important. However, both the relatively scarce remains often associated with hunter–gatherers, and the great time-depth that separates many hunter–gatherers from the present, make their study particularly difficult. The archaeology of past hunter–gatherers has been intimately entangled with the anthropology of contemporary hunter–gatherers, which has provided many critical insights into likely patterns of behaviour. However, there are clear dangers involved in reliance upon ethnographic analogies, not least that they can imply that modern hunter–gatherers remain, in some ways, living fossils of past ways of life. Equally, the use of analogy, at times, risks simply re-inventing modern behaviours in the past. This is particularly relevant to research that investigates issues of behavioural modernity and tries to establish the association of our evolutionary development to what we regard as human behaviour. A further complication lies in the debate as to whether “hunter–gatherer” is a meaningful category or is simply the product of 17th and 18th century thought, subsequently repurposed for colonial use. 

This call for papers invites authors to submit research papers that consider issues such as whether there is such a thing as an archaeology of hunter–gatherers that unites them over time and space, the use of scientific archaeology to study past hunter–gatherers and provide a counterbalance to analogy, and the cultural heritage management of past hunter–gatherer societies, often played down in national myths.

Dr. Bill Finlayson
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Heritage is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • hunter-gatherer archaeology
  • cultural heritage management
  • scientific archaeology

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

17 pages, 4096 KiB  
Review
Is There Such a Thing as Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology?
by Graeme Warren
Heritage 2021, 4(2), 794-810; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4020044 - 14 May 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 6778
Abstract
This paper examines two related questions: firstly, whether there is a distinctive field of practice that might be called “hunter-gatherer archaeology” and which is different than other kinds of archaeology, and secondly, how such a claim might be justified. This question is considered [...] Read more.
This paper examines two related questions: firstly, whether there is a distinctive field of practice that might be called “hunter-gatherer archaeology” and which is different than other kinds of archaeology, and secondly, how such a claim might be justified. This question is considered through four prisms: (1) whether hunter-gatherers provide a unitary object of research; (2) whether hunter-gatherer archaeology is the same in different parts of the world; (3) whether hunter-gatherer archaeology is characterised by distinctive forms of archaeological record; and (4) whether there are distinctive themes within the field. None of these approaches provide a single unifying core, with any definition at best a constellation of “partially shared features” and with considerable difficulties surrounding the uncritical continued use of the concept of hunter-gatherers, which is linked to colonial ideologies and practices. Rather than provide a single unitary answer, it is proposed that the value and legitimacy of the concept of “hunter gatherer archaeology” requires consideration in the local contexts within which it might be used. In the European context within which I work, the broader social significance of the idea of the hunter-gatherer provides a significant opportunity for the development of a self-reflexive and publicly engaged hunter-gatherer archaeology committed to decoloniality. In this context, the potentials that the idea of a “hunter-gatherer archaeology” provides can, with caution, justify the continued use of the term. This answer will not characterise other locations, especially in colonised nations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology and Cultural Heritage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop