The Impact of Nutritional Support on Improving Treatment Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients

A special issue of Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Nutrition".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 August 2024 | Viewed by 320

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska St. 213, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
Interests: nutrition; intensive care; sepsis; biomarkers; endotoxemia

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nutritional support for critically ill patients is essential, but the results of multiple studies indicate that the nutrition of patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often not optimal. Factors such as inadequate nutrient intake, impaired gastric emptying, and intestinal dysmotility can lead to malnutrition, which is associated with immunosuppression, poor wound healing, and muscle weakness. In this Special Issue of Nutrients, we will discuss the usefulness of various tools for assessing nutritional status and estimating energy requirements in critically ill patients. Parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition and the optimal timing with which to start enteral nutrition will be discussed. Studies examining different approaches to the nutrition of ICU patients are welcome for submission.

Dr. Barbara Adamik
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Nutrients is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • critically ill
  • enteral nutrition
  • biomarkers
  • NUTRIC score
  • calories
  • proteins

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Other

11 pages, 2571 KiB  
Systematic Review
Early Enteral Nutrition (within 48 h) for Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Carlos F. Grillo-Ardila, Diego Tibavizco-Palacios, Luis C. Triana, Saúl J. Rugeles, María T. Vallejo-Ortega, Carlos H. Calderón-Franco and Juan J. Ramírez-Mosquera
Nutrients 2024, 16(11), 1560; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111560 - 22 May 2024
Viewed by 210
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Medical nutrition therapy provides the opportunity to compensate for muscle wasting and immune response activation during stress and trauma. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the safety and effectiveness of early enteral nutrition (EEN) in adults with sepsis or [...] Read more.
OBJECTIVE: Medical nutrition therapy provides the opportunity to compensate for muscle wasting and immune response activation during stress and trauma. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the safety and effectiveness of early enteral nutrition (EEN) in adults with sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP tools were searched from inception until July 2023. Conference proceedings, the reference lists of included studies, and expert content were queried to identify additional publications. Two review authors completed the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment; disagreements were resolved through discussion. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) comparing the administration of EEN with no or delayed enteral nutrition (DEE) in adult populations with sepsis or septic shock. RESULTS: Five RCTs (n = 442 participants) and ten NRSs (n = 3724 participants) were included. Low-certainty evidence from RCTs and NRSs suggests that patients receiving EEN could require fewer days of mechanical ventilation (MD −2.65; 95% CI, −4.44–0.86; and MD −2.94; 95% CI, −3.64–−2.23, respectively) and may show lower SOFA scores during follow-up (MD −1.64 points; 95% CI, −2.60–−0.68; and MD −1.08 points; 95% CI, −1.90–−0.26, respectively), albeit with an increased frequency of diarrhea episodes (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.115–4.34). Even though the patients with EEN show a lower in-hospital mortality rate both in RCTs (OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.39–1.23) and NRSs (OR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69–1.13), this difference does not achieve statistical significance. There were no apparent differences for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Low-quality evidence suggests that EEN may be a safe and effective intervention for the management of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop