nutrients-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Non-Nutritive Sweeteners: Breaking the Barriers

A special issue of Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643). This special issue belongs to the section "Nutrition and Public Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 July 2021) | Viewed by 7031

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Interests: dietary assessment methodology; non-nutritive sweeteners; dietary and beverage pattern analysis; sugar-sweetened beverages

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
Interests: dietary and lifestyle determinants of obesity; type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases; chronic disease prevention; global nutrition transition; diet quality; added sugar and sugar sweetened beverages

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The purpose of this Special Issue entitled “Non-Nutritive Sweeteners: Breaking the Barriers” is to: 1) investigate the roles of specific types of non-nutritive sweeteners on health, including but not limited to diabetes, cardiovascular disease, weight management, and cancer in human and animal models; 2) assess the impact of non-nutritive sweeteners on health from a clinical trial perspective that spans from animal models and clinical trials in humans, to behavioral/free-living investigations rather than an observational lens; 3) describe changes in dietary intake patterns and appetite in response to consuming non-nutritive sweeteners; and 4) develop dietary assessment methodology that encompasses all sources of non-nutritive sweetener intake to allow for inferential testing of their effects on health and dietary intake.

Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs), or artificial sweeteners, are low-calorie sweeteners frequently recommended as a substitute for added sugars to reduce caloric intake and manage blood glucose levels. However, major barriers are present when attempting to determine if non-nutritive sweetener intake is associated with negative health outcomes, thus causing significant controversy. A major source of this controversy comes from the inability of consumers, clinicians, and researchers to determine how much and what types of NNS are consumed. Because it is difficult to ascertain amounts consumed (e.g., due to the various types of NNS available, the thousands of dietary products that contain NNSs, and the milligram quantities in a product not displayed on a label), many investigations rely on the use of diet soda as a proxy of NNS intake. However, the common practice of using diet soda as a proxy has several fatal flaws: 1) This practice overlooks the issue surrounding satiety from liquid vs. solid dietary intake, which could impact cardio-metabolic outcomes. 2) This method significantly underestimates the number of NNS consumers. A recent investigation showed that as many as 30% of people may be incorrectly labeled as non-consumers when only diet soda was used as a proxy. 3) Finally, the assumption that all diet sodas, and thus NNSs, are equivalent draws serious concerns regarding the validity and robustness of previous investigations employing this practice. As each NNS has a distinct chemical profile and metabolic pathway, the impacts of each on health outcomes are likely to differ, and must be assessed individually.

We expect that this Special Issue will add to the literature significantly by inferentially testing the impact of consuming specific types of non-nutritive sweetener on health and dietary intake.

We look forward to receiving your submissions; please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions regarding this Issue.

Thank you and kind regards,

Dr. Valisa Hedrick
Dr. Vasanti S. Malik
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Nutrients is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Non-nutritive sweeteners
  • Artificial sweeteners
  • Low-calorie sweeteners
  • High-intensity sweeteners
  • Sucralose
  • Aspartame
  • Saccharin
  • Stevia
  • Neotame
  • Acesulfame-potassium
  • Diet beverages
  • Soft drinks
  • Diet
  • Nutrition
  • Obesity
  • Weight management
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Appetite
  • Diabetes
  • Metabolism
  • Dietary assessment

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 2243 KiB  
Article
Saccharin and Sucralose Protect the Glomerular Microvasculature In Vitro against VEGF-Induced Permeability
by Emmanuella Enuwosa, Lata Gautam, Linda King and Havovi Chichger
Nutrients 2021, 13(8), 2746; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082746 - 10 Aug 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3022
Abstract
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has become a global health concern, with about 40% of people living with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus developing DKD. Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the kidney is a significant pathology of DKD associated [...] Read more.
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has become a global health concern, with about 40% of people living with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus developing DKD. Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the kidney is a significant pathology of DKD associated with increased glomerular vascular permeability. To date, however, current anti-VEGF therapies have demonstrated limited success in treating DKD. Recent studies have shown that artificial sweeteners exhibit anti-VEGF potential. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the effects of aspartame, saccharin, and sucralose on VEGF-induced leak using an in vitro model of the glomerular endothelium. Saccharin and sucralose but not aspartame protected against VEGF-induced permeability. Whilst the sweeteners had no effect on traditional VEGF signalling, GC-MS analysis demonstrated that the sweetener sucralose was not able to enter the glomerular endothelial cell to exert the protective effect. Chemical and molecular inhibition studies demonstrated that sweetener-mediated protection of the glomerular endothelium against VEGF is dependent on the sweet taste receptor, T1R3. These studies demonstrate the potential for sweeteners to exert a protective effect against VEGF-induced increased permeability to maintain a healthy endothelium and protect against vascular leak in the glomerulus in settings of DKD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-Nutritive Sweeteners: Breaking the Barriers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 283 KiB  
Article
Changes in Non-Nutritive Sweetener Consumption Patterns in Response to a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Intervention
by Darlene Acero, Jamie M. Zoellner, Brenda M. Davy and Valisa E. Hedrick
Nutrients 2020, 12(11), 3428; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113428 - 8 Nov 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3091
Abstract
Data are lacking on whether non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) can be used as a strategy to support decreases in sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption. The purpose of this secondary analysis of a 6-month SSB-reduction intervention was to explore changes in NNS consumption patterns in Talking [...] Read more.
Data are lacking on whether non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) can be used as a strategy to support decreases in sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption. The purpose of this secondary analysis of a 6-month SSB-reduction intervention was to explore changes in NNS consumption patterns in Talking Health participants within the SIPsmartER (n = 101) intervention. Additionally, participant characteristics were compared for three SSB-NNS change groups (decrease SSB/increase NNS; decrease SSB/no increase in NNS; increase/no change in SSB/regardless of NNS). There was a significant increase in aspartame and total NNS intake for participants (mean daily mg increases of 37.2 ± 13.9 and 63.7 ± 18.5, respectively). With the exception of sex, no differences in participant characteristics were found between the three SSB-NNS change groups. Furthermore, no significant changes in weight or body mass index (BMI) were demonstrated between SSB-NNS change groups over time. Diet soda was the most commonly consumed source of NNS; however, other dietary sources of NNS also contributed to intake. At 6 months, intake of sucralose and saccharin were primarily from dietary sources other than diet sodas (94% and 100%, respectively). These findings suggest that NNS may be a feasible strategy to help reduce SSB consumption. This study supports the need to consistently quantify and identify NNS intake, beyond using diet soda intake as a proxy for NNS intake and grouping all NNS types into one variable, to more accurately address the potential health effects of NNS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-Nutritive Sweeteners: Breaking the Barriers)
Back to TopTop