Nuclear Safety

A special issue of Safety (ISSN 2313-576X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2018) | Viewed by 22456

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Professor Chair in Nuclear Engineering, Nuclear Engineering Research Group, Departament of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, School of Engineering of Barcelona, Technical University of Catalunya, Avda. Diagonal 647, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
2. Commissioner, Spanish Nuclear Safety Council,C. De Pedro Justo Dorado 11, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3. Chairman of the Spanish Nuclear Energy Technology Platform (CEIDEN), Madrid, Spain
Interests: nuclear safety; nuclear safety regulation, PSA; capacity building; education and training
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Commissioner Technical Advisor, Temporary Staff at Nuclear Safety Council, Spain

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nuclear power plants use fissile materials to produce energy in the form of heat and, as a result of this process, radioactive materials are produced as a by-product. Whilst radioactive materials can have beneficial uses, such as in cancer therapy, they are generally harmful to health. Thus, their use and the process by which they are produced must be strictly regulated to ensure nuclear safety. The main objective of nuclear safety is the achievement of proper operating conditions and the prevention and mitigation of accident consequences, resulting in protection of workers, the public and the environment from undue radiation hazards. There are many relevant factors that have an impact on nuclear safety of nuclear power plants during operation, e.g., evolution of nuclear power plants boundary conditions (including organisation and safety culture, renewal and capacity building of personnel, available technology infrastructure such as engineering companies and suppliers); equipment obsolescence, documentation update, computational methods, technological upgrades; ageing management of structures, systems, and components; radiological impact, radwaste and spent fuel management; lessons-learned and operating experience; evolution of regulations and standards; adequate management of nuclear security, interface between security and safety.

Prof. Dr. Javier Dies
Ing. Jacobo Zegri
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Safety is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Safety and Long Term Operation (operation beyond 40 years)
  • Safety and Subsequent License Renewal (operation beyond 60 years)
  • Safety on new NPP
  • Ageing management
  • Safety and Capacity building, Education and training
  • Accident Tolerant Fuel
  • Radwaste management
  • Radwaste transport
  • Efficiency of the regulatory body
  • Safety culture

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 1251 KiB  
Article
Safety Culture Oversight: An Intangible Concept for Tangible Issues within Nuclear Installations
by Benoît Bernard
Safety 2018, 4(4), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4040045 - 09 Oct 2018
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 9397
Abstract
Traced back to the Chernobyl Accident analysis (INSAG-1), the concept of safety culture is regarded as a central phenomenon influencing behaviors and values within high-risk organisations. Many studies have already been conducted on safety culture within nuclear installations. Describing a model designed to [...] Read more.
Traced back to the Chernobyl Accident analysis (INSAG-1), the concept of safety culture is regarded as a central phenomenon influencing behaviors and values within high-risk organisations. Many studies have already been conducted on safety culture within nuclear installations. Describing a model designed to capture and assess safety culture observations, this paper intends to highlight the role of safety culture within the overall regulatory nuclear safety oversight, and to show how intangible cultural elements can lead to the identification of tangible safety issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1598 KiB  
Article
A Safety Culture Maturity Matrix for Nuclear Regulatory Bodies
by Benoît Bernard
Safety 2018, 4(4), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4040044 - 02 Oct 2018
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 12236
Abstract
The concept of safety culture has attracted a great deal of attention. Since the rise of the concept, progress has been made regarding the definition of safety culture and the development of tools dedicated to safety culture oversight and self-assessment. In addition, these [...] Read more.
The concept of safety culture has attracted a great deal of attention. Since the rise of the concept, progress has been made regarding the definition of safety culture and the development of tools dedicated to safety culture oversight and self-assessment. In addition, these recent advances have been made across different high-hazard industries, and obviously in the nuclear world. Nevertheless, little attention has been paid to tailored methods allowing a regulatory body to assess its own safety culture. The aim of this paper is to present a framework adapted to nuclear regulatory bodies or TSOs (Technical Safety Organisations) in order to guide them in understanding their own safety culture through a “Safety Culture Maturity Matrix”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop