sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Architecture, Cities, and Sustainable Development Goals

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Urban and Rural Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 13 August 2024 | Viewed by 3362

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
Interests: emerging cities; human-environment interactions; social-cultural sustainability; assessment of urban open spaces; global south; design pedagogy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
Interests: sustainable urban mobility and wayfinding; virtual reality and sustainable design; pedestrian-oriented urban design; urban planning for age-friendly communities
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Architecture, cities, and sustainable development converge at the intersection between knowledge development in design innovation and the future of our built environment. At this juncture, a dynamic interplay of concepts, theories, principles, imperatives, and strategies co-exist with the aim of not only redefining the physical environment that makes up our cities but also revolutionizing the way that we inhabit, interact with, and steward this environment.

As the world's population continues to migrate to urban areas, our design decisions in architecture and urbanism have profound and lasting implications. Sustainable architecture endeavours to construct buildings that harmoniously coexist with their physical surroundings and social contexts, leveraging renewable sources, and prioritizing eco-friendly materials to minimize the environmental impact throughout their life cycle. On a larger scale, sustainable cities are planned to prioritize the well-being of their inhabitants by promoting walkability, healthy lifestyles, efficient public transportation, socio-spatial justice, and equitable access to services.

Aim of this Special Issue:

Architecture, Cities, and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):

The 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) instigated a novel agenda for sustainable development, through which research in architecture and urbanism plays a pivotal role and established benchmarks aim at eradicating poverty, safeguarding our planet, and ensuring prosperity for all. This Special Issue aims at presenting research findings that contribute to the discourse on how buildings and cities can endure and flourish in the face of global challenges. Its key interest is in showcasing original research that integrates sustainability principles and ecological imperatives into architecture and urban design and planning. This includes research that offers solutions to pressing challenges including climate change, social disparities, heritage and cultural sensitivity, circular urban planning, and community resilience. We desire research papers, case studies, and evidence-based project reports that elucidate the path to creating buildings and cities that are ecologically responsible and socially inclusive.

Topics of interest:

We welcome submissions on a wide range of topics on architecture and cities as they relate to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including, but not limited to, the following subjects:

  1. User-Centred Design and Co-Creation: Articles that engage with collaborative design approaches that involve stakeholders in the design process to ensure that sustainability and human experience are integrated seamlessly;
  2. Urban Design and Spatial Development for Resilience: This topic is centred on urban design and planning and their critical role in creating resilient cities that can withstand and adapt to social and environmental challenges;
  3. Social Equity and Inclusivity: This topic is based on the premise that achieving sustainability in cities involves efforts that successfully address social disparities and injustice while promoting urban inclusivity;
  4. Sustainability and Environmental Stewardship: Articles that place emphasis on the responsible use of resources and environmental conservation, the reuse of existing built structures before embarking on new developments, and preserving green fields;
  5. Circular Urban Planning: This topic explores urban planning approaches that prioritize circularity by designing cities for resource optimization, sustainable transportation, and integrated waste management systems;
  6. Psychological Resilience and Sustainable Cities: We welcome articles that focus on investigating the role of the built environment in supporting psychological resilience and well-being in the face of crises, natural disasters, and disease spread.

 All articles should offer reflections on and engage with one or more of the SDGs, either as initiators for the research/study or as future directions from the perspective of the findings and outcomes.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Ashraf M. Salama
Prof. Dr. Ruth Conroy Dalton
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • inclusivity
  • social equity
  • sustainable design
  • sustainable cities
  • urban resilience
  • user-centred design

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

24 pages, 11624 KiB  
Article
Color Authenticity for the Sustainable Development of Historical Areas: A Case Study of Shiquan
by Mingrui Miao, Lyuhang Feng, Yao Wu, Rong Zhu and Dawei Xu
Sustainability 2024, 16(6), 2417; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062417 - 14 Mar 2024
Viewed by 547
Abstract
Currently, historical areas in China are facing issues of color authenticity and excessive commercialization. Colors, as an important element of historical areas, reflect their history and culture. However, there are some flaws in the existing research methods, so a more scientific and systematic [...] Read more.
Currently, historical areas in China are facing issues of color authenticity and excessive commercialization. Colors, as an important element of historical areas, reflect their history and culture. However, there are some flaws in the existing research methods, so a more scientific and systematic method is needed to obtain accurate and objective color visualization results to promote the sustainable development of historical areas. In order to explore the methods and applications of visualizing the environmental color patterns of historical areas, Shiquan Street in Suzhou, China, was taken as the research object; ArcGIS 10.5 was used to obtain the street-view photo samples; Matlab was used to summarize the architectural colors of the historical areas; and K-means clustering was used to generate the central color card of the historical areas, thus completing the color visualization of the historical areas, followed by further searching for the color patterns and central colors, so as to explore the strategies for sustainable development of historical areas. The various quantified color models of historical areas can explore the regional uniqueness and color locality of historical areas, which avoids problems such as homogenization of block colors, unclear styles and features, and an excessive proportion of commercial colors caused by poor color guidance and control in the design related to historical areas, providing approaches to the research on the harmonious unity of environmental colors and features related to historical areas. A color-based research method has been proposed to protect and maintain the original appearance of historical areas. The application of this method provides a new perspective and possibility for the protection of historical areas, allowing these areas to achieve historical sustainability while maintaining their historical characteristics and values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Architecture, Cities, and Sustainable Development Goals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 6844 KiB  
Article
Assessment of the Impact of Basic Public Service Facility Configuration on Social–Spatial Differentiation: Taking the Zhaomushan District of Chongqing, China
by Ao Sun, Yong Huang, Li Yang, Chen Huang and Hengling Xiang
Sustainability 2024, 16(1), 196; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010196 - 25 Dec 2023
Viewed by 733
Abstract
Objectively assessing the impact of various basic public service facilities on social–spatial differentiation has become a prerequisite for promoting urban social integration and development. However, in practice, the configuration of basic public service facilities is not always conducive to social integration, especially at [...] Read more.
Objectively assessing the impact of various basic public service facilities on social–spatial differentiation has become a prerequisite for promoting urban social integration and development. However, in practice, the configuration of basic public service facilities is not always conducive to social integration, especially at the microscale. Effectively measuring the inhibitory or aggravating effects of various basic public service facility configurations on social–spatial differentiation has become a challenge. Based on the assumption that the configuration of basic public service facilities has inhibitory and aggravating effects on social–spatial differentiation, this study selected two types of objects: social space and basic public service facilities to refine the research elements. Using spatial and statistical analysis methods such as ecological factors, clustering, correlation, mediation, and superposition analysis, a framework was constructed to evaluate the impact of basic public service facility configuration on social–spatial differentiation and take the Zhaomushan area in Chongqing, China, as a typical case for verification. The study found that registered residence, income, employment location, and residential density are still the main factors of social–spatial differentiation in the study area. The main factors contributing to the differentiation of basic public service facilities are elderly care and housing security, public transportation and green space access, education and employment security, and small-scale medical and health facilities in the study area. In the eight principal factor pairs after the superposition of two differentiation spaces, six pairs showed weakened spatial differentiation, while two pairs showed intensified spatial differentiation. This indicates that the allocation of basic public service facilities will simultaneously inhibit and exacerbate social–spatial differentiation, but the inhibitory effect is significantly stronger than the exacerbating effect. Among them, public transportation and green parks are the main types of facilities that mainly exacerbate social–spatial differentiation. This dual effect is specifically reflected in the change in the spatial adaptation position of social space and basic public services, the weakening of the original social space differentiation boundary and the emergence of new differentiation boundaries simultaneously, and the multicenter composite form of social space. In the future, quantitative evaluation based on research frameworks can provide scientific basis for constructing spatial adaptability strategies for the supply of basic public service facilities and social production and life, such as adjusting the distribution, scale, and spatiotemporal relationship between basic public service facilities and residential communities in a reasonable manner. This is crucial for promoting social integration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Architecture, Cities, and Sustainable Development Goals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 5508 KiB  
Review
Reconceptualizing Proximity Measurement Approaches through the Urban Discourse on the X-Minute City
by Gehad Megahed, Abeer Elshater, Samy Afifi and Mohab Abdelmoneim Elrefaie
Sustainability 2024, 16(3), 1303; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031303 - 03 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1492
Abstract
The “x-minute city” concept gained attention within the global urban discourse on post-pandemic cities. Recently, numerous cities have shifted their attention from considering the x-minute city merely as a theoretical concept to one with practical applicability, rediscovering the proximity dimension to be integrated [...] Read more.
The “x-minute city” concept gained attention within the global urban discourse on post-pandemic cities. Recently, numerous cities have shifted their attention from considering the x-minute city merely as a theoretical concept to one with practical applicability, rediscovering the proximity dimension to be integrated into urban policies and plans. Consequently, a requirement emerged to develop comprehensive approaches for monitoring and assessing this proximity. In this perspective, this article seeks to answer two main questions: What are approaches utilized in the literature to measure proximity within the context of “x-minute cities”? How could these measurement models accurately reflect real-world scenarios? The aim is to identify the models and variables required for measuring proximity within the framework of x-minute cities. A review of 38 peer-reviewed articles following the PRISMA statement was performed by searching the Web of Science database for publications from 2020 to 2023. Our results clarified the essential components of the measurement models and presented recommendations for more comprehensive assessments. The findings highlight the variable deficiencies that affect proximity measurement approaches. The recommendations hold the potential to enhance measurement models, contributing to the development of urban communities that are more accessible and interconnected. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Architecture, Cities, and Sustainable Development Goals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop