sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Low Carbon Innovation—Strategic Steps toward Deep Transition

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Sustainability and Applications".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2019) | Viewed by 11189

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
Interests: sustainability transitions; government of complex systems; future cities, infrastructures and mobility systems; China and the world
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The Paris Agreement confirms the dawn of a new stage in global efforts regarding climate change. Formal, international agreement now acknowledges that only rapid and deep socio-technical transition without precedent has any hope of achieving the 1.5 °C target. Meanwhile actual trends across almost all relevant metrics at global scale continue to show growth or, at best, stabilization. The importance and urgency of low-carbon innovation thus appears as intense as it has ever been. The usual response, amongst research and policy alike, is thus to redouble efforts to understand and support low-carbon innovations that promise these profound reductions in GHG emissions. There is little evidence, however, that this top-down, managerial approach will be able to deliver reductions going forward that it has failed to achieve thus far. Skepticism seems even more warranted once one factors in the broader set of deepening and unforeseen global disruptions, beyond climate change, in which context such planned or managed transition must take place, but which is often curiously absent in discussions even of low-carbon ‘system’ transition. This would include geopolitical turbulence, with a still–dominant global North in disarray and rising non-Western powers, especially China; the disruption of emerging digital and ‘post-human’ technologies; profound socio-cultural changes and polarizations concerning issues of generation, gender and sexuality, ethnicity and cosmopolitization; and deepening (intra-national) socio-economic inequality. In such circumstances, the systemic complexity of actual socio-political forces at play affecting low-carbon innovation promises only to become increasingly overwhelming.

This Special Issue thus aims to explore a different approach. This asks primarily not how, and which, low-carbon innovations (and policies thereof) can themselves directly deliver the smooth passage to the deep transition needed. Rather it starts by acknowledging that systemic disruption, and across multiple dimensions, is taking place anyway. From here the question instead becomes how and which low-carbon innovations are best enabled and propelled by this turbulent context; and how they may then, in turn, be used to shape, harness and/or channel the system-level change towards ethically and politically preferable futures. Accordingly, we invite contributions that explore diverse case studies, from across the world, that strategically illuminate the emerging parallel co-production of specific, concrete developments and system-level change, so as to enable working with, rather than seeking to contain, the irreducible uncertainty and complexity of deep system transition. Papers that use inter- or trans-disciplinary approaches to research the conjunction of low-carbon innovation and adjacent, but often neglected, sites of dynamic activity—such as digital innovation, urban governance and initiatives, or cultural, heritage and religious movements—are particularly welcome.

Dr. David Tyfield
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Low-carbon innovation
  • deep system transition
  • digital revolution
  • geopolitical disruption
  • complex systems
  • rise of China
  • cultural change
  • power relations

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 275 KiB  
Article
Can Pay-As-You-Go, Digitally Enabled Business Models Support Sustainability Transformations in Developing Countries? Outstanding Questions and a Theoretical Basis for Future Research
by David Ockwell, Joanes Atela, Kennedy Mbeva, Victoria Chengo, Rob Byrne, Rachael Durrant, Victoria Kasprowicz and Adrian Ely
Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 2105; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072105 - 09 Apr 2019
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 6157
Abstract
This paper examines the rapidly emerging and rapidly changing phenomenon of pay-as-you-go (PAYG), digitally enabled business models, which have had significant early success in providing poor people with access to technologies relevant to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (e.g., for electricity access, water [...] Read more.
This paper examines the rapidly emerging and rapidly changing phenomenon of pay-as-you-go (PAYG), digitally enabled business models, which have had significant early success in providing poor people with access to technologies relevant to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (e.g., for electricity access, water and sanitation, and agricultural irrigation). Data are analysed based on literature review, two stakeholder workshops (or “transformation labs”), and stakeholder interviews (engaging 41 stakeholders in total). This demonstrates the existing literature on PAYG is patchy at best, with no comprehensive or longitudinal, and very little theoretically grounded, research to date. The paper contributes to existing research on PAYG, and sustainability transformations more broadly, in two key ways. Firstly, it articulates a range of questions that remain to be answered in order to understand and deliver against the current and potential contribution of PAYG in affecting sustainability transformations (the latter we define as achieving environmental sustainability and social justice). These questions focus at three levels: national contexts for fostering innovation and technology uptake, the daily lives of poor and marginalised women and men, and global political economies and value accumulation. Secondly, the paper articulates three areas of theory (based on emerging critical social science research on sustainable energy access) that have potential to support future research that might answer these questions, namely: socio-technical innovation system-building, social practice, and global political economy and value chain analysis. Whilst recognising existing tensions between these three areas of theory, we argue that rapid sustainability transformations demand a level of epistemic pragmatism. Such pragmatism, we argue, can be achieved by situating research using any of the above areas of theory within the broader context of Leach et al.’s (2010) Pathways Approach. This allows for exactly the kind of interdisciplinary approach, based on a commitment to pluralism and the co-production of knowledge, and firmly rooted commitment to environmental sustainability and social justice that the SDGs demand. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Carbon Innovation—Strategic Steps toward Deep Transition)
17 pages, 656 KiB  
Article
Reducing Working Hours as a Means to Foster Low(er)-Carbon Lifestyles? An Exploratory Study on Swiss Employees
by Hugo Hanbury, Christoph Bader and Stephanie Moser
Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 2024; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072024 - 05 Apr 2019
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4599
Abstract
In the ongoing discussions on the transition to low-carbon systems a reduction of working hours has gained increased interest. A shift to lower incomes coupled with more discretionary time might promote low(er) individual carbon lifestyles without impairing individual well-being. Lower carbon emissions have [...] Read more.
In the ongoing discussions on the transition to low-carbon systems a reduction of working hours has gained increased interest. A shift to lower incomes coupled with more discretionary time might promote low(er) individual carbon lifestyles without impairing individual well-being. Lower carbon emissions have been linked to shorter working hours on a macroeconomic level and to lower income, and thus less carbon-intensive activities on an individual level. However, little empirical research has been done on the effects of a self-determined reduction of working time on an intra-individual level. The aim of this paper was to explore whether and how a reduction of working hours facilitates low(er)-carbon lifestyles. We do this by means of 17 qualitative guideline interviews with Swiss employees that had recently reduced their working hours. Our results suggest that the underlying motives behind the employees’ decisions to reduce their working hours are crucial. A beneficial climate-saving effect arose only for those employees who dedicated their newly gained time to binding activities, that require a certain degree of commitment, such as parenting and further education. In contrast, those who reduced their working hours due to a desire for more recreational time risked increasing the carbon intensity of their lifestyles due to carbon-intensive leisure activities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Carbon Innovation—Strategic Steps toward Deep Transition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop