sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The Potential and Contradictions of Mega Infrastructure Development Projects in Contributing to Sustainable Development in Rapidly Growing Countries and Regions

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2022) | Viewed by 7345

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Cultural Geography, Director Urban & Regional Studies Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Interests: social impact assessment; social impact management; project induced displacement and resettlement; social license to operate; social sustainability; extractive industries and society; rural communities; community engagement; human rights impact assessment; business and human rights; Indigenous rights; free, prior and informed consent; natural resource sociology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen 9727, Netherlands
Interests: environmental and social impact assessment; environmental, spatial and infrastructure planning; integrated, life-cycle and area-oriented planning approaches; evaluation methods (multi criteria analysis, social cost benefit analysis, ex post evaluation, follow-up); adaptive planning and management; public-private partnerships, stakeholder involvement, multi-level governance; institutional analysis and design
Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700, Netherlands
Interests: urban policy; transport policy; mega cities; social outcomes

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700, Netherlands
Interests: mega cities; urban policy; transport policy; social outcomes

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Considerable investment is being made in mega infrastructure development projects around the world, especially in developing countries. This growth is being driven by population growth, urbanization, and/or demand for improved essential public infrastructure. A wide range of international and local actors are involved. The infrastructure development projects include: railways, roads and bridges, airports, dams, electricity generation projects, and large-scale housing projects. Many justifications are given for such investments, including: triggering sustainable economic growth; climate change adaptation and mitigation; facilitating inclusive urbanization; and enhancing the livelihoods of local populations. However, it is questionable whether mega infrastructure development projects actually result in sustainable and equitable development over time and across scales.

Fundamental issues related to the processes and outcomes from such development projects need to be critically examined. What are the broader social outcomes from international development investment in developing economies? How are social and environmental risks assessed, managed, and mitigated in project development processes? To what extent and how do such projects contribute to a fair distribution of accessibility and quality of life of the population across a city and region? How do infrastructure development projects address interests and socioeconomic conditions of differing localities? What are the challenges and opportunities to facilitate sustainable development through international development projects?

The objective of this Special Issue is to explore critical components and processes to ensure that mega infrastructure development projects contribute to sustainable development in rapidly growing countries and regions. We encourage submissions of theoretical and/or empirical papers, as well as analyses of case studies of mega infrastructure development projects across the globe. Topics of interest include but are not limited to:

  • Sustainable development planning;
  • The equity and sustainability of development outcomes;
  • Social impact assessment of mega projects;
  • Urban infrastructure decision-making;
  • International development governance and politics;
  • Social and environmental risk management of infrastructure development projects;
  • Multiscale impact analysis of mega projects;
  • Multilevel infrastructure planning and development;
  • Mega-urban regional planning and development.

Prof. Dr. Frank Vanclay
Prof. Jos Arts
Dr. Juhyun Lee
Dr. Isti Hidayati
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • megaprojects
  • public infrastructure
  • sustainable development
  • development outcomes
  • social impact assessment
  • essential public services
  • social sustainability
  • social justice
  • sustainable transport
  • transport planning
  • environmental, social, and governance factors in project planning

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 860 KiB  
Article
Resource-Financed Infrastructure: Thoughts on Four Chinese-Financed Projects in Uganda
by Tom Ogwang and Frank Vanclay
Sustainability 2021, 13(6), 3259; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063259 - 16 Mar 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 6494
Abstract
Increasingly common methods for financing public infrastructure in developing economies are Resources-for-Infrastructure (R4I) and Resource-Financed Infrastructure (RFI), usually involving Chinese financial institutions and Chinese construction companies. Although there are advantages to the borrowing country from these project financing arrangements, there are also various [...] Read more.
Increasingly common methods for financing public infrastructure in developing economies are Resources-for-Infrastructure (R4I) and Resource-Financed Infrastructure (RFI), usually involving Chinese financial institutions and Chinese construction companies. Although there are advantages to the borrowing country from these project financing arrangements, there are also various issues and governance challenges. In Uganda, expectations around future revenue from oil extraction have led to many infrastructure projects being commissioned, mostly funded by RFI arrangements. To consider the appropriateness of these arrangements and to reflect on whether they are likely to contribute to positive development outcomes or be examples of the resource curse, we examined four public infrastructure projects: Kampala–Entebbe Expressway; Karuma Hydroelectric Dam; Isimba Hydroelectric Dam; and the Malaba to Kampala section of the East Africa Standard Gauge Railway. Although R4I/RFI arrangements are viewed positively by some commentators, others (especially local companies) consider they lack transparency, create unsustainable debt, promote China’s interests over the borrowing country, increase unemployment, unfairly compete with local business, deal in corruption, have poor working conditions, and result in substandard construction. Nevertheless, we conclude that Uganda and other developing countries have generally benefited from Chinese-funded infrastructure, and there is more myth trap than debt trap. However, to ensure positive development outcomes, governments and construction companies should ensure compliance with international standards, especially relating to: environmental and social impact assessment; human rights; benefit-sharing arrangements; livelihood restoration; and project-induced displacement and resettlement. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop