sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Political Ecology, Agroecology, and Food Sovereignty

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability in Geographic Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2021) | Viewed by 8709

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
Interests: political ecology; food sovereignty; agroecology; agrarian change; peasantry; rural and environmental politics; social movements; political economy of agri-food systems; biodiversity

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue seeks to explore a particular interpretation of political ecology—as a theoretical frame for understanding human (social)–nature relations based not in constructivism/idealism or in reductive (vulgar) materialism, but rather in dialectical or historical materialism. As such, this frame constitutes a synthesis of the social and natural sciences by retaining the social specificity of politicoeconomic systems (the ‘political’) whilst recognizing their inescapable biophysical constitution and dependencies (the ‘ecological’). This approach to political ecology (see Tilzey 2018) is distinctive in its emphasis on an integrated, but differentiated, ontology of socionatural relations. This is because it regards social systems as being constituted by, and dependent on, biophysical capacities whilst insisting that these capacities are always mediated, and constructed, by human social relations, power structures, and conceptualizations that are specific in time and place.

Capitalism currently dominates social relations and power structures globally—it is the dominant ‘mode of production’—and political ecology represents a powerful means of understanding the ‘political’ dynamics underlying this mode of production, together with its ‘ecological’ prerequisites and contradictions. This Special Issue is concerned with linking this powerful analysis of capitalism and its ecological contradictions to a political ecology of emancipatory praxis—in other words, how to confront and resolve these contradictions through social relational transformation that constructs noncapitalist ‘political’ structures in alignment with ‘ecological’ capacities. This emancipatory praxis will here focus on two closely related and overlapping approaches to the means of generating human sustenance that is simultaneously socially egalitarian and ecologically sustainable—agroecology and food sovereignty. Thus, agroecology is an approach to farming that ‘ecologically’ attempts to provide sustainable yields through the use of environmentally sound management technologies, while ‘politically’ (as a social movement) it pursues “forms of social action which redirect the course of co-evolution between nature and society in order to address the crisis of modernity” (Sevilla Guzman and Woodgate 1999: 83). Food sovereignty bases itself on agroecology, whilst emphasizing the ‘political’ dimension which inter alia “implies new social relations free of oppression and inequality between men and women, peoples, racial groups, social and economic classes and generations” (La Via Campesina 2003). These ‘political’, emancipatory framings of agroecology and food sovereignty are themselves contested, however, along a spectrum from ‘progressive’ to ‘radical’ proposals for social change.

Given the above issues, and their profound relevance to perhaps the most pressing dilemmas of our time, I invite contributions to this Special Issue. They may address one or more of the following themes—additional, related themes are, however, welcome:  

  • Political ecology as theory and praxis;
  • Political ecology as theoretical foundation for agroecology and food sovereignty;
  • Contested understandings and political constructions of agroecology and food sovereignty;
  • The agrarian question, agroecology, and food sovereignty;
  • National developmentalism, ‘post-developmentalism’, and ‘alternative development’ as framings of agroecology and food sovereignty;
  • The peasantry and indigenous peoples as agents of agroecology and food sovereignty.

Dr. Mark Tilzey
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Political ecology
  • Agroecology
  • Food sovereignty
  • Emancipatory politics
  • Post-capitalist livelihoods

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 758 KiB  
Article
Political Agroecology in Senegal: Historicity and Repertoires of Collective Actions of an Emerging Social Movement
by Patrick Bottazzi and Sébastien Boillat
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6352; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116352 - 3 Jun 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4408
Abstract
Agroecology has become an ideological foundation for social and environmental transformation in sub-Saharan Africa. In Senegal, agroecological advocacy coalitions, made up of farmers’ organizations, scientists, NGOs, and IOs, are using agroecology as an umbrella concept for proposing policy changes at multiple scales. We [...] Read more.
Agroecology has become an ideological foundation for social and environmental transformation in sub-Saharan Africa. In Senegal, agroecological advocacy coalitions, made up of farmers’ organizations, scientists, NGOs, and IOs, are using agroecology as an umbrella concept for proposing policy changes at multiple scales. We describe the history of the agroecological movement in Senegal in the context of the constitution of a national advocacy coalition. We then examine the “repertoires of collective action” mobilized by the coalition. Four repertoires are identified: technical support and knowledge co-production, territorial governance, alternative food networks, and national policy dialogue. Our analysis highlights the potential that these multi-level approaches have to sustainably transform the current food systems in sub-Saharan Africa. However, our research also reveals the limited agency of farmer organizations and the limitations of a movement that is strongly dependent on NGOs and international donors, leading to a “projectorate” situation in which contradictory policy actions can overlap. We further argue that, although the central government has formally welcomed some of the principles of agroecology into their policy discourse, financial and political interests in pursuing a Green Revolution and co-opting agroecology are pending. This leads to a lack of political and financial autonomy for grassroots farmers’ organizations, limiting the development of counter-hegemonic agroecology. We discuss the conditions under which territorial approaches, and the three other repertoires of collective action, can have significant potential to transform Sub-Saharan Africa in the coming years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Political Ecology, Agroecology, and Food Sovereignty)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 392 KiB  
Article
Market Dependency as Prohibitive of Agroecology and Food Sovereignty—A Case Study of the Agrarian Transition in the Scottish Highlands
by Elise Wach
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 1927; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041927 - 11 Feb 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3334
Abstract
While there have been calls amongst the more ‘political’ or ‘radical’ agroecology and food sovereignty advocates for a break from capitalist food systems, conceptualisations of capitalism, and thus counter-capitalism, vary widely. The movements have largely presented small-scale producers and peasants as alternatives to [...] Read more.
While there have been calls amongst the more ‘political’ or ‘radical’ agroecology and food sovereignty advocates for a break from capitalist food systems, conceptualisations of capitalism, and thus counter-capitalism, vary widely. The movements have largely presented small-scale producers and peasants as alternatives to industrial food systems, and have focused on reducing input dependency as a path towards autonomy of producers and the realisation of agroecological food systems. An alternative to this approach is presented here through applying Ellen M. Wood’s conceptualisation of capitalism as characterised by ‘market dependency’ to the case of the agrarian transition in the Scottish Highlands. This article demonstrates the specific ways in which market dependency, including for agricultural outputs, not just inputs, leads to a divergence from agroecological food systems. It argues that identifying ‘market dependency’ as a defining characteristic of capitalism could strengthen and refine the focus of agroecology and food sovereignty movements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Political Ecology, Agroecology, and Food Sovereignty)
Back to TopTop