sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Large-Scale Solar Electricity Networks and the Energy Transition

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Energy Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2020) | Viewed by 19478

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Falk School of Sustainability, Chatham University, 1 Woodland Road, Pittsburgh PA 15232, USA; Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh PA 15213, USA
Interests: Large-scale utilization of solar electricity; Urban and community sustainability and resilience

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Interests: applied statistics; data science; econometrics; fintech
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Solar photovoltaics (PV) have become the fastest-growing energy technology due to cost decreases and technological advances [1]. Together, the scale of solar resources and low lifetime greenhouse gas emissions of this technology make PV an appealing method to meet a large fraction of global electricity demand, and to further electrify heating, transportation, and industry [2]. We are inviting contributions that critically assess pathways to the large-scale usage of solar electricity.

A major obstacle to large-scale usage of PV is solar intermittency due to weather and the daily and seasonal cycles. Recent work has shown the potential for batteries as well as combinations of different renewables to eliminate intermittency [3-10]. Mitigating seasonal intermittency at low cost poses challenges, however, as seasonal storage or overcapacity for winter can dramatically increase costs [11-12]. A few recent studies have designed optimized networks linking PV electricity generation across large areas with high voltage transmission direct current (HVDC) lines, including across both hemispheres to balance seasonal intermittency [11-13]. The Special Issue will advance understanding of what such large-scale renewable networks could look like and how they could be operated. This includes cost-comparisons, especially between interhemispheric solar networks and regional networks combining different renewables, necessary advancements in HVDC transmission and submarine cables [14,15], and cost estimates for interhemispheric networks [11,16].

The Special Issue will also expand current knowledge on the larger requirements and impacts of large-scale utilization of renewable energy sources, in particular, solar PV. We are interested in the economics of large-scale renewable electricity networks [17], investment mechanisms and infrastructure design [16-20], risk management [21], international agreements and operating schemes [22,23], and associated changes in the organization of the electricity market [24-26]. We invite articles that contribute to a deeper understanding of requirements for cross-national electricity trade [24-29], welfare and distributional impacts, and the role of distributed renewable energy within a cross-national grid. Electricity markets are no longer closed systems within national or regional boundaries, as evidenced by the European power grid [20,21,25,26].

We also invite contributions that explore the changing role of market players, such as electric utilities, political bodies, or new actors like aggregators [27] given new opportunities and requirements arising from the large-scale grid-integration of intermittent renewables and consumer participation in electricity generation. Previous work has explored strategies to better match supply and demand in a high-renewable system, including time-of-use rates, utility-scale and behind-the-meter storage, intelligent appliances, and smart grids [27-35]. For this Special Issue, we are interested in deepening current knowledge on how these approaches can enable the transition to electricity systems that are powered mainly by renewables. The changing role of diverse market players also shows the need for a holistic approach towards the complex process of the ongoing energy transition. Such an approach should include socio-economic and technological aspects but also an understanding of human factors such as acceptance and willingness to participate in the energy transition, as well as possibilities for compromise-oriented policy solutions [28]. We welcome contributions on the “soft factors” of the energy transition such as human behavior and institutional frameworks, including the potential for participatory governance [29].

References:

  1. Haegel, N.M., Margolis, R., Buonassisi, T., Feldman, D., Froitzheim, A., Garabedian, R., Green, M., Glunz, S., Henning, H.M., Holder, B., Kaizuka, I., Kroposki, B., Matsubara, K., Niki, S., Sakurai, K., Schindler, R.A., Tumas, W., Weber, E. R., Wilson, G., Woodhouse, M., Kurtz, S. Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Trajectories and challenges. Science 2017, 356 (6334), 141–143.
  2. Haegel, N.M., Atwater, H., Barnes, T., Breyer, C., Burrell, A., Chiang, Y.M., Wolf, S.D., Dimmler, B., Feldman, D., Glunz, S., Goldschmidt, J.C., Hochschild, D., Inzunza, R., Kaizuka, I., Kroposki, B., Kurtz, S., Leu, S., Margolis, R., Matsubara, K., Metz, A., Metzger, W. K., Morjaria, M., Niki, S., Nowak, S., Peters, I.M., Philipps, S., Reindl, T., Richter, A., Rose, D., Sakurai, K., Schlatmann, R., Shikano, M., Sinke, W., Sinton, R., Stanbery, B.J., Topic, M., Tumas, W., Ueda, U., Lagemaat, J. v. d., Verlinden, P., Vetter, M., Warren, E., Werner, M., Yamaguchi, M., Bett, A.W. Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: transform global energy. Science 2019, 364(6443), 836–838.
  3. Child, M., Bogdanov, D., Breyer, C. The role of storage technologies for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe. 2018, 155, 44–60.
  4. Jacobson, M.Z., Delucchi, M.A., Cameron, M.A., Mathiesen, B.V. Matching demand with supply at low cost in 139 countries among 20 world regions with 100% intermittent wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) for all purposes. Renewable Energy 2018, 123, 236–248.
  5. Solomon, A.A., Child, M., Caldera, U., Breyer, C. How much energy storage is needed to incorporate very large intermittent renewables? Energy Procedia 2017, 135, 283–293.
  6. MacDonald, A.E., Clack, C.T.M., Alexander, A., Dunbar, A., Wilczak, J., Xie, Y. Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO2 emissions. Nature Climate Change 2016, 6, 526–531.
  7. Cochran, J., Mai, T., Bazilian, M. Meta-analysis of high penetration renewable energy scenarios. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2014, 29, 246–253.
  8. International Renewable Energy Agency. Power system flexibility for the energy transition, Part 1: Overview for policy makers. IRENA 2018, Abu Dhabi.
  9. Parra, D., Norman, S.A., Walker, G.A., Gillott, M. Optimum community energy storage for renewable energy and demand load management. Applied Energy 2017, 200, 358–369.
  10. Rehmani, M.H., Reisslein, M., Rachedi, A., Erol-Kantarci, M., Radenkovic, M., Integrating renewable energy resources into the smart grid: recent developments in information and communication technologies. IEEE Transact. Ind. Inf. 2018, 14(7), 2814–2825.
  11. Grossmann, W., Grossmann, I., Steininger, K. Distributed solar electricity generation across large geographic areas, Part II: A Pan-American energy system based on solar. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2014, 32, 983–993.
  12. Grossmann, W., Grossmann, I., Steininger, K. Solar electricity supply isolines of generation capacity and storage. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2015, 112, 3663–3668.
  13. Grossmann, W., Grossmann, I., Steininger, K. Distributed solar electricity generation across large geographic areas, Part I: A method to optimize site selection, electricity generation, and storage. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2013, 25, 831–843.
  14. Alassi, A., Bañales, S., Ellabban, O., Adam, G., MacIver, C. HVDC transmission: technology review, market trends and future outlook. Renew. Sus. Energ. Rev. 2019, 112, 530–554.
  15. Purvins, A., Sereno, L., Ardelean, M., Covrig, C.-F., Efthimiadis, T., Minnebo, P. Submarine power cable between Europe and North America: a techno-economic analysis. J. Cleaner Production 2018, 186, 131–145.
  16. Chatzivasileiadis, S., Ernst, D., Andersson, G. The global grid. Renew. Energy 2013, 57, 372–383.
  17. Chatzivasileiadis, S., Ernst, D., Andersson, G. Global power grids for harnessing world renewable energy. In: Jones, L.E. Renewable Energy Integration, 2017, Elsevier, 161–174.
  18. ENTSO-E. Ten Year Network Development Plan, 2014.
  19. McCalley, J., Caspary, J., Clack, C., Galli, W., Marquis, M., Osborn, D., Orths, A., Sharp, J., Silva, V., Zeng, P. Wide-area planning of electric infrastructure: assessing investment options for low-carbon futures. IEEE Power Energ. Mag. 2017, 15(6), 83–93.
  20. Pierri, E., Binder, O., Hemdan, N.G.A., Kurrat, M. Challenges and opportunities for a European HVDC grid. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017, 70, 427–456.
  21. Torbaghan, M.E., Burrow, M.P.N, Hunt, D.V.L., Elcheikh, M. Risk-based framework (RBF) for a UK Pan-European supergrid. Energy 2017, 124, 124–132.
  22. Brinkerink, M., Gallachóir, Deane, P. A comprehensive review on the benefits and challenges of global power grids and intercontinental interconnectors. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2019, 107, 274–287.
  23. Halawa, E., James, G., Shi, X.R., Sari, N.H., Nepal, R. The prospect for an Australian-Asian power grid: a critical appraisal. Energies 2018, 11.
  24. Lilliestam, J., Ellenbeck, S., Karakosta, C., Caldés, N. Understanding the absence of renewable electricity imports to the European Union. Intern. J Energ. Sector Manage. 2016, 10, 291–311.
  25. Verzijlbergh, R.A., De Vries. J., Dijkema, G.P.J., Herder, P.M. Institutional challenges caused by the integration of renewable energy sources in the European electricity sector. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2017, 75, 660–667.
  26. Newbery, D., Pollitt, M.G., Ritz, R.A., Strielkowski, W. Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2018, 91, 695–707.
  27. Chatzivasileiadis, S., Ernst, D. The state of play in cross-border electricity trade and the challenges towards a global electricity market environment. In: Cottier, T., Espa, I. International trade in sustainable electricity, 2017, Cambridge University Press, 21–45.
  28. Komendantova, N., Riegler, M., Neumueller S., (2018). Of transitions and models: Community engagement, democracy, and empowerment in the Austrian energy transition.Energy Research & Social Science 39: 141–151. DOI:1016/j.erss.2017.10.031.
  29. Komendantova, N., Ekenberg, L., Marashdeh, L., Al-Salaymeh, A., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., and Danielson, M., (2018). Energy security concerns dominating over environmental concerns? Evidence from stakeholder participation process on energy transition in Jordan. Climate 6 (4): e88. DOI:3390/cli6040088.
  30. Singh, A., Jamasb, T., Nepal, R., Toman, M. Electricity cooperation in South Asia: barriers to cross-border trade. Energ. Pol. 2018, 120, 741–748.
  31. Ji, L., Jia, X., Chiu, A.S.F., Xu, M. Global electricity trade network: structures and implications. PLoS ONE 2016, 11(8).Tian, Z., Guowei, G. Business models of cross-border power transmission line: examples from Europe and America. Adv. Econ. Bus. Management Res. 2019, 76.
  32. Pallesen, T., Jacobsen, P.H., 2018. Solving infrastructural concerns through a market reorganization: a case study of a Danish smart grid demonstration. Energ. Res. Soc. Sci 2018, 41, 80–88.
  33. Zepter, J.M., Lüth, A., del Granado, P.C., Egging, R. Prosumer integration in wholesale electricity markets: synergies of peer-to-peer trade and residential storage. Energy & Buildings 2019, 184, 163–176.
  34. Skjølsvold, Throndsen, W., Ryghaug, M., Fjellså, I.F., Koksvik, G.H. Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition: new empirical and conceptual insights. Energ. Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 46, 252–261.
  35. Goulden, M., Spence, A., Wardman, J., Leygue, C. Differentiating ‘the user’ in DSR: developing demand side response in advanced economies. Energ. Po. 2018, 122, 176–185.

Dr. Iris Grossmann
Dr. Nadejda Komendantova
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Large-scale solar electricity networks
  • energy transition
  • solar photovoltaics
  • solar intermittency
  • international electricity market
  • international electricity trade
  • high voltage direct current (HVDC)
  • grid-integration of renewables
  • renewable energy
  • energy storage
  • changing role of electric utilities
  • human factors for energy transition
  • institutional frameworks for energy transition
  • participatory governance for energy transition

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1850 KiB  
Article
Deployment of Hydropower in Nepal: Multiple Stakeholders’ Perspectives
by Rana Pratap Singh, Hans Peter Nachtnebel and Nadejda Komendantova
Sustainability 2020, 12(16), 6312; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166312 - 5 Aug 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5032
Abstract
Nepal could rely on its huge renewable energy potentials to meet its energy demand sustainably. Also, renewable energy sources are considered by several national policy makers and international organizations as an engine for socio-economic development of the country, which can provide access to [...] Read more.
Nepal could rely on its huge renewable energy potentials to meet its energy demand sustainably. Also, renewable energy sources are considered by several national policy makers and international organizations as an engine for socio-economic development of the country, which can provide access to electricity to everybody and stimulate economic activity and economic growth. Several efforts were taken by the national government to stimulate deployment of renewable energy electricity generation capacities. However, the country is still not able to cover its energy needs with renewable energy despite decades of efforts for their deployment. The assumption of this research was that uncertainty in energy policy and planning gaps in Nepal are connected with the dominance of a limited number of discourses and ignorance of other voices which might be helpful. Nowadays, evidence exists that a multi-stakeholder and multi-sector perspective is extremely important for sustainable development. We provide evaluation of various perspectives, including technical, social, economic, environmental, and political. We collect empirical data in frames of a comprehensive stakeholders’ process in Nepal. The stakeholders’ preferences are analyzed through various methods of decision support sciences such as multi criteria decision analysis. To fast track hydropower development, the government has classified them into five categories based on their generation capacity. Assessment of each category and their collective comparison on multiperspectives has never been tried. Hence, such an assessment leading towards their prioritization is the objective of the study. It may help to identify a suitable strategy or policy to maximize national benefits. The study carried within the framework of five alternatives (categories) of hydropower schemes and nine different hydropower perspectives applicable in Nepalese context. The scoring method based is on secondary source evidence is applied for assessment. The study ranks medium schemes (25 to 100 MW) as best in Nepalese context. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Large-Scale Solar Electricity Networks and the Energy Transition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 772 KiB  
Article
Water–Energy Nexus: Addressing Stakeholder Preferences in Jordan
by Nadejda Komendantova, Leena Marashdeh, Love Ekenberg, Mats Danielson, Franziska Dettner, Simon Hilpert, Clemens Wingenbach, Kholoud Hassouneh and Ahmed Al-Salaymeh
Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 6168; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156168 - 31 Jul 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4500
Abstract
The water and energy sectors are fundamentally linked. In Jordan, especially in the face of a changing climate, the water–energy nexus holds a number of challenges but also opportunities. A key point in exploring synergies is the identification of such, as well as [...] Read more.
The water and energy sectors are fundamentally linked. In Jordan, especially in the face of a changing climate, the water–energy nexus holds a number of challenges but also opportunities. A key point in exploring synergies is the identification of such, as well as the communication between the water and energy sectors. This paper promotes the importance of using a co-creative approach to help resolve opposing views and assessing stakeholder preferences in the context of the water–energy nexus in Jordan. A computer-supported, co-creative approach was used to evaluate stakeholder preferences and opinions on criteria and future scenarios for the energy and water sector in Jordan, identifying common difficulties and possibilities. The criteria describe socio-ecological aspects as well as techno-economic aspects for both systems. Discussing a set of preliminary scenarios describing possible energy and water futures ranked under a set of sector relevant criteria, a consensus between both stakeholder groups is reached. The robustness of results is determined, using a second-order probabilistic approach. The results indicate that there are no fundamental conflicts between the energy and water stakeholder groups. Applying a participatory multi-stakeholder, multi-criteria framework to the energy-water nexus case in Jordan promotes a clear understanding of where different stakeholder groups stand. This understanding and agreement can form the basis of a joint water–energy nexus policy used in the continued negotiation process between and within national and international cooperation, as well as promoting and developing acceptable suggestions to solve complex problems for both sectors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Large-Scale Solar Electricity Networks and the Energy Transition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2818 KiB  
Article
Probabilistic Generation Model of Solar Irradiance for Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems Using Weibull Distribution
by Muhammad Umar Afzaal, Intisar Ali Sajjad, Ahmed Bilal Awan, Kashif Nisar Paracha, Muhammad Faisal Nadeem Khan, Abdul Rauf Bhatti, Muhammad Zubair, Waqas ur Rehman, Salman Amin, Shaikh Saaqib Haroon, Rehan Liaqat, Walid Hdidi and Iskander Tlili
Sustainability 2020, 12(6), 2241; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062241 - 13 Mar 2020
Cited by 34 | Viewed by 4369
Abstract
Around the world, countries are integrating photovoltaic generating systems to the grid to support climate change initiatives. However, solar power generation is highly uncertain due to variations in solar irradiance level during different hours of the day. Inaccurate modelling of this variability can [...] Read more.
Around the world, countries are integrating photovoltaic generating systems to the grid to support climate change initiatives. However, solar power generation is highly uncertain due to variations in solar irradiance level during different hours of the day. Inaccurate modelling of this variability can lead to non-optimal dispatch of system resources. Therefore, accurate characterization of solar irradiance patterns is essential for effective management of renewable energy resources in an electrical power grid. In this paper, the Weibull distribution based probabilistic model is presented for characterization of solar irradiance patterns. Firstly, Weibull distribution is utilized to model inter-temporal variations associated with reference solar irradiance data through moving window averaging technique, and then the proposed model is used for irradiance pattern generation. To achieve continuity of discrete Weibull distribution parameters calculated at different steps of moving window, Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) is employed. Goodness of Fit (GOF) techniques are used to calculate the error between mean and standard deviation of generated and reference patterns. The comparison of GOF results with the literature shows that the proposed model has improved performance. The presented model can be used for power system planning studies where the uncertainty of different resources such as generation, load, network, etc., needs to be considered for their better management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Large-Scale Solar Electricity Networks and the Energy Transition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2301 KiB  
Article
Spanish Photovoltaic Solar Energy: Institutional Change, Financial Effects, and the Business Sector
by Raquel Fernández-González, Andrés Suárez-García, Miguel Ángel Álvarez Feijoo, Elena Arce and Montserrat Díez-Mediavilla
Sustainability 2020, 12(5), 1892; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051892 - 2 Mar 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 5067
Abstract
Spain is a country with a high dependence on fossil fuels. For this reason, in 2007, it implemented a bonus system that aimed to encourage the production of renewable energies, particularly photovoltaic solar energy. These production bonuses, guaranteed by the Spanish government, led [...] Read more.
Spain is a country with a high dependence on fossil fuels. For this reason, in 2007, it implemented a bonus system that aimed to encourage the production of renewable energies, particularly photovoltaic solar energy. These production bonuses, guaranteed by the Spanish government, led to an exponential increase in the number of companies in the market and, consequently, the MWh produced. However, in 2012, given the excessive budgetary burden involved in maintaining this “feed-in tariff” system and after several years of institutional instability, the aforementioned system of incentives for phoyovoltaic (PV) energy was eliminated. This paper has tried to analyze the consequences of this institutional change, a clear example of the “hold up” problem. For this purpose, a sample of 5354 companies, which was divided, geographically, into Spanish regions and, temporarily, into three different periods, has been taken, considering diverse economic and financial variables. The results show a notable weakening of the sector that, due to the effects of the regulatory change, has lost attractiveness and profitability for investors and is consequently suffering from stagnation, which has led to the disappearance of many companies in the sector. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Large-Scale Solar Electricity Networks and the Energy Transition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop