sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Materiality in Sustainability Reporting

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 May 2022) | Viewed by 7425

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Accounting, HEC Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 2A7, Canada
Interests: ESG disclosure; ESG performance; ESG ratings; materiality; financial materiality

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainability has become a central societal consideration, thereby affecting industry and organizational competitiveness, and leading to investors increasing demand for information on firms’ exposure and management of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. As a result, firms face increasing pressure to measure their externalities and disclose information about whether their operations are economically, socially, and environmentally sustainable. Industry bodies such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) actively promote and recommend that firms’ disclosure focuses more on ESG issues that directly affect their bottom line. Although materiality forms the conceptual bedrock of financial reporting, it is only recently, with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s (SASB) framework, that concrete and industry-specific guidelines to integrate financial materiality in ESG reporting has been brought forward. Because investment practices are deeply rooted in the financial logic of shareholder value, despite its social, environmental and ethical goals, financial materiality became one of the most important shifts in sustainability reporting. Financial materiality is assumed to improve the informativeness of ESG reporting as it directs firms, investors and other stakeholders’ attention to ESG risks and opportunities that are critical to their business. Moreover, the financial materiality of ESG issues offers a latent explanation for why there has been so much inconclusive evidence of the ESG–financial performance relationship in previous research. From a practical perspective, financial materiality can bridge the gap between financial statements and ESG reporting. These aspects reinforce the relevance of better understanding the drivers and the effects of integrating financial materiality in ESG assessment and reporting, which is the objective of this Special Issue.

Some sample questions to guide submissions include, but are not limited to:

  • Does the financial materiality of ESG issues influence the ESG–financial performance relationship?
  • What are the mechanisms, practices, and tactics to assess and report on financial material ESG issues?
  • How do material and immaterial ESG issues affect stakeholder engagement?
  • How does financial materiality in ESG reporting impact investors’ decision making?
  • Can other (non-investor) stakeholders also benefit from financial materiality in ESG information? How?
  • How does financial materiality impact the independent assurance of ESG disclosure?
  • Which outcomes, both desirable and problematic, can financial materiality in ESG reporting produce?
  • Is there an interplay between firm’s corporate governance structure and the adoption of financial materiality in ESG reporting?
  • Which national or regional contexts enable (or constrain) the adoption and usefulness of financial materiality?

Prof. Eduardo Schiehll
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • financial materiality
  • ESG reporting
  • sustainability
  • ESG performance
  • investors
  • stakeholders

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 891 KiB  
Article
Water Resource Management in Hotels Using a Sustainable Balanced Scorecard
by Natalia Antonova, Ines Ruiz-Rosa and Javier Mendoza-Jimenez
Sustainability 2022, 14(13), 8171; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138171 - 4 Jul 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3631
Abstract
It is essential to find a balance between tourism development and sustainable consumption of water resources. To achieve this goal, a Sustainable Balanced Scorecard connected to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) is proposed for optimal water resource management in the hotel sector. The [...] Read more.
It is essential to find a balance between tourism development and sustainable consumption of water resources. To achieve this goal, a Sustainable Balanced Scorecard connected to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) is proposed for optimal water resource management in the hotel sector. The Scorecard is based on four perspectives: customer, internal processes, learning and improvement, and financial. The key variables were agreed on with stakeholders in the sector, and the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard was tested empirically on a sample of 70 hotels in island tourism destinations in the Macaronesia region. The results revealed that though more and more hotels have tried to implement strategies to save water, they were still a long way from reaching the international standard of 140 L per guest night. In addition, there were significant differences concerning water consumption according to hotel category. The Sustainable Balanced Scorecard in this paper adds to the existing works about materiality in sustainability. It can also support business decision making about the SDGs and help potential investors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materiality in Sustainability Reporting)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 570 KiB  
Article
Sustainability Indicators: Information Asymmetry Mitigators between Cooperative Organizations and Their Primary Stakeholders
by Clea Beatriz Macagnan and Rosane Maria Seibert
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8217; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158217 - 22 Jul 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2916
Abstract
The research aims to identify indicators of representative information on sustainability from the cooperative organizations’ primary stakeholders’ perspective to mitigate information asymmetry. The study develops in seven stages: the primary stakeholders’ selection and training; the evidence survey; the triangulation between stakeholder responses, forming [...] Read more.
The research aims to identify indicators of representative information on sustainability from the cooperative organizations’ primary stakeholders’ perspective to mitigate information asymmetry. The study develops in seven stages: the primary stakeholders’ selection and training; the evidence survey; the triangulation between stakeholder responses, forming an indicators list; the indicators analysis by specialists; tests for indicators disclosure; and the indicators validation through the disclosure analysis. As a result, a list contains 61 sustainability indicators from the primary stakeholders’ perspective, in four pillars: economic, 20; social, 18; environmental, 13; and cultural, 10. With the cooperative organizations’ websites disclosure analysis, we found that the disclosure policies focus more on information asymmetry mitigating in the pillars: cultural and social, with the environmental and economic being neglected. Therefore, the procedures for disclosing information on sustainability have weaknesses. These policies reduce the primary stakeholders’ reliability about the cooperatives management system respective, limiting the primary stakeholders’ perspective on the cooperative organization value. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materiality in Sustainability Reporting)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop