Flood Risk Management: Interaction between Humans and Floods

A special issue of Water (ISSN 2073-4441). This special issue belongs to the section "Hydrology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2023) | Viewed by 3279

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Geography, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Interests: eco-hydrology and water resources management; hydrological extremes and variability; disaster risk management; socio-hydrology; human-water research; integrated river basin management; inter- and transdisciplinary research; participatory modelling; sustainable development
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Geography, University of Osnabrück, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany
Interests: global change and the water cycle: socio-hydrological interactions and dynamics; perception and handling of uncertainties in water resource management; floods; water in agriculture; human-environment research; inter- and transdisciplinary research

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue focuses on advances in human–flood interactions through an interdisciplinary lens. Even though events of (extreme) flooding and flood (risk) management are not a new topic, recent examples in Europe and worldwide have revealed again that the aim of reducing flood-related risks to human health, the environment, infrastructure, and property has only been achieved to a limited extent by current flood risk management efforts. To mitigate flood risk in the future, a better understanding and management of the interlinkages between hydrological extremes and society is crucial. This research requires new conceptual frameworks and inter- or transdisciplinary approaches.

Thus, the scope of this issue includes hydro-social and socio-hydrological research on river floods, or flash floods, which critically reflects the advances which have been made in flood risk management but also looks at the areas which have been left out.

For example, in the European Union, the conditions for flood risk management have been improved since 2007 with the implementation of the European Flood Risk Management Directive (FRMD). Many new instruments, such as flood hazard and risk maps, building regulations, or the category of flood emergence areas, were introduced. For example, flood hazard and flood risk maps and corresponding management plans have been prepared based on historical discharge data, water levels, and hydrological and hydraulic modelling. However, recent examples have shown that the objective of the FRMD to reduce flood-related risks has only been achieved to a limited extent. It has been indicated that due to the changing climate, more hydrological extremes will happen. For example, in Germany, there is currently a drought in regions where we had seen substantial flooding last year’s same season.

We wonder, on the one hand, how people perceive these extreme differences. What effect has this had on the willingness for self-preparation and support of flood protection measures? On the other hand, we wonder why efforts such as the FRMD and its implementation have not been successful in mitigating the effects of flooding.

We invite the community to critically reflect on the advances that have been undertaken and which challenges still remain. We are especially interested in interdisciplinary research, which uses different methodologies to understand human–flood interactions. We welcome contributions related to the interactions between people and floods, but we especially encourage submissions on the following topics:

  • Hydro-social and socio-hydrological research on flooding;
  • Spatio–temporal dynamics and interdependencies;
  • Influence of human activities on hazards and risks;
  • Modelling approaches in integrated flood risk;
  • Impact of uncertainty on flood perception;
  • The perception and handling of uncertainty in flood risk management;
  • New conceptualizations of the interlinkages and feedbacks between hydrological extremes and society;
  • Flood governance;
  • Co-development of policies, collaborative decision-making, and communication with stakeholders.

We are looking forward to gathering new insights into Flood Risk Management from an interdisplinary perspective,

Prof. Dr. Mariele Evers
Prof. Dr. Britta Höllermann
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Water is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • human–flood system
  • hydro-social
  • socio-hydrology
  • water governance
  • flood risk management, integrated modelling, trans- and interdisciplinarity

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 1276 KiB  
Article
Changing Winters and Adaptive Water Governance: A Case Study on the Kemi River Basin, Finland
by Eerika Albrecht
Water 2023, 15(11), 2024; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15112024 - 26 May 2023
Viewed by 1174
Abstract
This paper studies adaptive water governance in the context of hydropower and flood-risk management. The Kemi River basin acts as an empirical setting to study the environmental change and the capacity of the management system to respond to it. Hydropower and reservoir development [...] Read more.
This paper studies adaptive water governance in the context of hydropower and flood-risk management. The Kemi River basin acts as an empirical setting to study the environmental change and the capacity of the management system to respond to it. Hydropower and reservoir development has been a source of a decade-long environmental conflict in the river basin. This study aims to find out how governance structures are adapting to the environmental change brought on by climate change. The study is based on case study research, and it combines long-term monitoring data, semi-structured interviews conducted in December 2020 and January 2021, and Finnish administrative court rulings. The results reveal that the water governance in the Kemi River basin is based on a technology driven aquatic regime, which has been a source of persistent environmental conflict between technology and nature. The flood-risk management is based on adaptive planning cycles and is implemented in a participatory manner, although it is strengthening the conflict in the area, as some stakeholders suggests reservoirs as a solution, which neglects the potential of integrative river basin management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flood Risk Management: Interaction between Humans and Floods)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 77639 KiB  
Article
Floods and Emergency Management: Elaboration of Integral Flood Maps Based on Emergency Calls (112)—Episode of September 2019 (Vega Baja del Segura, Alicante, Spain)
by Antonio Oliva and Jorge Olcina
Water 2023, 15(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010002 - 20 Dec 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1667
Abstract
Emergency mapping makes it possible to manage an emergency situation and even to analyze the catastrophic event, a posteriori, in order to improve action protocols for Civil Protection. The emergency maps are produced from the analysis of calls to the Emergency Coordination Centre [...] Read more.
Emergency mapping makes it possible to manage an emergency situation and even to analyze the catastrophic event, a posteriori, in order to improve action protocols for Civil Protection. The emergency maps are produced from the analysis of calls to the Emergency Coordination Centre (911 or 112). Thus, the concept of integral risk mapping arises, in which risk mapping and aspects that allow for more realistic analysis and mapping through the analysis of emergency calls in the event of a natural event converge. In this case, the analysis is focused on the floods that occurred from 12 to 15 September 2019 in the Vega Baja del Segura district (Alicante, Spain). The results obtained show that this is the flooding episode with the highest number of emergency calls in Valencian region and Vega Baja del Segura district (2010–2022). Likewise, the spatial-temporal analysis of the geolocation of the calls and their reasons, have allowed us to draw up a much more detailed map of flooding or affected areas in 2019 than the official maps. In conclusion, the analysis of emergency calls makes it possible to identify problems and vulnerable areas where proposals can be made to reduce the impact of floods and increase the resilience of a territory. At the same time, it is presented as a novel field of research for the analysis of natural and anthropic risks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flood Risk Management: Interaction between Humans and Floods)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop