Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Three Key Geometries of a Steam Ejector under Varied Primary Nozzle Geometries
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimation of Large-Dimensional Covariance Matrices via Second-Order Stein-Type Regularization
Previous Article in Journal
A Dual-Population-Based NSGA-III for Constrained Many-Objective Optimization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Testing the Intercept of a Balanced Predictive Regression Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Models via EBIC with Energy Distance Correlation

Entropy 2023, 25(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25010014
by Isaac Xoese Ocloo 1,* and Hanfeng Chen 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Entropy 2023, 25(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25010014
Submission received: 20 November 2022 / Revised: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 18 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Statistical Methods for Modeling High-Dimensional and Complex Data)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper deals with the feature selection in high-D linear regression. The new contribu

tion is to use the so-called energy distance correlation in the place of the ordinay cor

relation coefficient to measure the dependence.

 

How some key information is missing. For example, f_w etc are undefined in v^2(W,Z). Fur

thermore, the norm used in the same formula is undefined either. Though we can guess wha

t they are, how to calculate those measures from data is not clear at all, which could b

e particularly challenging, if ever possible, in the setting of p>n.

 

The presentation of the paper can benefit tremendously from a careful reading. I list a

few (there are more!) obvious inadequacies below.

 

In the abstract, the sentence starting with "we propose to use the energy distance corre

lation ..." almost repeats its twice --- delete one.

 

p.2 l.36: delete ":"

 

p.2. l.42: results in

 

p.3 l.53: delete "we are sure"

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The revision has addressed my concerns in the first round. I am happy to the new version published as it is. 

Back to TopTop