Next Article in Journal
On the Entropy and the Maximum Entropy Principle of Uncertain Variables
Next Article in Special Issue
On Laws of Thought—A Quantum-like Machine Learning Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Low-Density Parity-Check Code Pair for Joint Source-Channel Coding Systems Based on Graph Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Open Systems, Quantum Probability, and Logic for Quantum-like Modeling in Biology, Cognition, and Decision-Making
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Contextuality in Collective Intelligence: Not There Yet

1
Collective Intelligence Laboratory, McMaster University, 92 Bowman St., Hamilton, ON L8S 2T6, Canada
2
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience an Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W., Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Entropy 2023, 25(8), 1193; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081193
Submission received: 24 July 2023 / Revised: 1 August 2023 / Accepted: 8 August 2023 / Published: 11 August 2023

Abstract

Type I contextuality or inconsistent connectedness is a fundamental feature of both the classical as well as the quantum realms. Type II contextuality (true contextuality or CHSH-type contextuality) is frequently asserted to be specific to the quantum realm. Nevertheless, evidence for Type II contextuality in classical settings is slowly emerging (at least in the psychological realm). Sign intransitivity can be observed in preference relations in the setting of decision making and so intransitivity in decision making may also yield examples of Type II contextuality. Previously, it was suggested that a fruitful setting in which to search for such contextuality is that of decision making by collective intelligence systems. An experiment was conducted by using a detailed simulation of nest emigration by workers of the ant Temnothorax albipennis. In spite of the intransitivity, these simulated colonies came close to but failed to violate Dzhafarov’s inequality for a 4-cyclic system. Further research using more sophisticated simulations and experimental paradigms is required.
Keywords: contextuality; collective intelligence; intransitive decision making; social insects contextuality; collective intelligence; intransitive decision making; social insects

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sulis, W.; Khan, A. Contextuality in Collective Intelligence: Not There Yet. Entropy 2023, 25, 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081193

AMA Style

Sulis W, Khan A. Contextuality in Collective Intelligence: Not There Yet. Entropy. 2023; 25(8):1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081193

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sulis, William, and Ali Khan. 2023. "Contextuality in Collective Intelligence: Not There Yet" Entropy 25, no. 8: 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081193

APA Style

Sulis, W., & Khan, A. (2023). Contextuality in Collective Intelligence: Not There Yet. Entropy, 25(8), 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081193

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop