Next Article in Journal
Phytochemical Characterization of Hibiscus tiliaceus L. Leaves and Evaluation of Their Antisickling, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities
Previous Article in Journal
Tumor Microenvironment Lactate: Is It a Cancer Progression Marker, Immunosuppressant, and Therapeutic Target?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Redox Additive Electrolytes for Supercapacitors: A Mini-Review on Recent Developments and Future Directions

1
Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Jining Polytechnic, Jining 272037, China
2
College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
3
Faculty of Humanities, Altai Li University, Barnaul 656099, Russia
4
State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(8), 1764; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081764
Submission received: 11 February 2025 / Revised: 11 April 2025 / Accepted: 12 April 2025 / Published: 15 April 2025

Abstract

:
Supercapacitors are promising energy storage devices that combine high power density, fast charge/discharge rates, and excellent cycling stability. However, their relatively low energy density compared to batteries remains a major challenge. To address this limitation, redox additive electrolytes have emerged as a key strategy to introduce reversible Faradaic reactions, significantly enhancing the energy storage capacity of supercapacitors. This mini-review systematically summarizes recent advancements in the use of redox-active species across aqueous, non-aqueous, and solid-state/gel electrolytes. We highlight the role of both inorganic and organic redox additives, detailing their mechanisms, advantages, and limitations in improving energy density and stability. Furthermore, we discuss the challenges associated with redox species, such as solubility, long-term stability, and parasitic side reactions, which hinder their practical applications. Future research directions are proposed to optimize redox-active materials and electrolyte systems, aiming to develop next-generation supercapacitors with superior energy density, extended cycling life, and enhanced applicability.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Supercapacitors (SCs), also known as electrochemical capacitors, are emerging as essential energy storage devices due to their superior characteristics, such as high power density, rapid charge/discharge capability, and outstanding cycle life [1,2,3]. These properties make them particularly suitable for applications requiring instantaneous energy delivery, such as electric vehicles, renewable energy systems, and portable electronics [4,5]. Unlike conventional batteries, which store energy via bulk redox reactions (Figure 1a), SCs utilize electric double-layer capacitance (EDLC) and pseudocapacitance [6,7,8,9,10]. EDLC arises from electrostatic charge accumulation at the electrode–electrolyte interface (Figure 1b) [11,12,13], whereas pseudocapacitance originates from fast, reversible redox reactions at or near the electrode surface [14,15] (Figure 1c).
Despite their advantages, SCs suffer from low energy density compared to batteries, which hinders their widespread application in energy-intensive systems [17]. The energy density (E) of a supercapacitor is directly proportional to the square of the operating voltage (V) and the capacitance (C), as given by E = 1/2CV2. Thus, increasing the operating voltage and the overall charge storage capacity is critical to enhancing supercapacitor performance [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, the electrochemical stability window (ESW) of the electrolyte fundamentally limits the operating voltage, presenting a significant bottleneck [25,26].
The electrolyte plays a decisive role in determining the electrochemical performance of SCs [27,28,29]. It provides ionic conductivity for charge transfer, defines the voltage window, and impacts the device’s energy density and stability. Electrolytes are broadly categorized into three types:
1. Aqueous electrolytes [30,31,32,33,34,35], such as H2SO4 and KOH, offer high ionic conductivity and cost-effectiveness but are restricted by a narrow voltage window (typically 1.0–1.2 V) due to water electrolysis.
2. Non-aqueous electrolytes [36,37,38,39,40,41], including organic solvents and ionic liquids (ILs), provide a broader voltage window (~3 V or more), enabling higher energy densities, but they suffer from lower ionic conductivity and higher cost.
3. Solid-state electrolytes [42,43,44,45,46,47], such as gel or polymer electrolytes, offer improved safety and flexibility but face challenges such as low ionic conductivity and poor performance at elevated temperatures.
Building upon the electrolyte challenges outlined above, the introduction of redox-active additives has emerged as a promising strategy to simultaneously address the dual constraints of low energy density and narrow voltage windows in supercapacitors [48,49]. By leveraging reversible oxidation–reduction reactions, these redox-active species create additional Faradaic charge storage pathways, effectively bridging the performance gap between traditional double-layer capacitors and batteries. As shown in Figure 2, redox-active electrolytes encompass both inorganic compounds (e.g., Fe2+/Fe3+, V2+/V3+) and organic molecules (e.g., quinones, viologens, 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyloxyl derivatives), which exhibit varied redox potentials [50,51,52,53,54]. The appropriate selection of redox-active species is crucial, as their redox potential determines the contribution to the overall voltage window and energy output of the device. For instance, inorganic redox couples typically offer robust stability and fast redox kinetics, while organic molecules allow for tunable redox potentials and molecular design flexibility.
Recent research has demonstrated the effectiveness of redox additives across three major electrolyte systems:
  • In aqueous electrolytes, redox-active species, such as K3Fe(CN)6 and NH4VO3, significantly expand the voltage window and improve energy density [56,57,58]. Their fast reaction kinetics and high solubility contribute to enhanced device performance.
  • In non-aqueous electrolytes, organic redox mediators (RMs), like viologens and ferrocene derivatives, exploit the wide electrochemical stability of organic solvents and ILs, achieving higher voltages and energy densities [37,59].
  • In solid-state electrolytes, redox-active gels or polymers incorporating species like hydroquinone and iodine-based mediators provide a balance between mechanical stability, safety, and improved charge storage [50,60,61,62].
Notably, research interest in redox-active electrolytes has increased dramatically in recent years. This highlights their potential as a transformative solution to the energy density limitations of conventional SCs. However, several challenges remain, including the stability of redox-active species over long-term cycling, their solubility in electrolytes, and the need to mitigate parasitic reactions that may occur during redox processes.
This mini-review aims to provide a concise yet comprehensive overview of recent advancements in the design, mechanisms, and performance of redox-active electrolytes across aqueous, non-aqueous, and solid-state systems. We systematically analyze the effects of redox species on supercapacitor energy and power densities, identify key challenges, and propose future research directions for the development of next-generation SCs.

2. Redox-Mediated Aqueous Electrolytes

Aqueous electrolytes, due to their high ionic conductivity, low cost, and environmental friendliness, are widely employed in SCs. However, their narrow ESW (typically 1.0–1.2 V) has significantly limited the achievable energy density [30,63]. Recent studies have demonstrated that incorporating redox-active additives into aqueous systems can introduce additional Faradaic charge storage, effectively expanding the operating voltage window and enhancing energy density. This section focuses on the advancements in inorganic and organic redox-active species, highlighting their mechanisms, benefits, and limitations in aqueous electrolyte-based SCs.

2.1. Inorganic Redox Additives in Aqueous Electrolytes

Inorganic redox additives have attracted considerable attention in recent years for their ability to enhance the performance of aqueous SCs. These additives, often based on transition metal compounds or other redox-active inorganic species, can expand the ESW, increase energy density, and improve cycling stability.
Chen et al. first reported the use of potassium ferricyanide K3Fe(CN)6 as an inorganic redox additive [64]. The redox-active Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− couple facilitated reversible Faradaic reactions (Figure 3a), which significantly increased the capacitance. A notable 5-fold improvement in specific capacitance was achieved compared to traditional EDLC systems alongside an expanded operating voltage window of 1.6 V, far exceeding the typical aqueous electrolyte limit (Figure 3b). This pioneering study underscored the feasibility of incorporating stable and robust redox couples into aqueous systems to boost energy storage capacity. Building on this concept, Sandhiya et al. investigated ammonium vanadate (NH4VO3) as a redox additive in H2SO4 electrolyte (Figure 3c) [65]. The addition of NH4VO3 led to a dramatic enhancement in specific capacitance (Figure 3d), increasing from 375 F g−1 to 658 F g−1, and improved the energy density to 32 W h kg−1—a 4.5-fold improvement over the baseline H2SO4 system. This enhancement was attributed to the redox activity of VO ions, which interact with H+ to deliver stable and reversible pseudocapacitance. The study underscored the importance of integrating transition metal-based RMs to overcome the inherent limitations of aqueous systems.
In an innovative approach, Tang et al. introduced a hybrid supercapacitor system using functionalized carbon nanotubes (FCNTs) and a neutral KBr-based redox-active electrolyte (Figure 3e) [66]. The incorporation of the Br⁻/Br3⁻ redox couple facilitated battery-like pseudocapacitive behavior on the positive electrode, while the FCNT electrodes retained electric double-layer behavior on the negative electrode. This hybrid system achieved a remarkable four-fold increase in energy density compared to traditional EDLCs using FCNTs in Na2SO4 electrolyte. A maximum energy density of 28.3 W h kg−1 was obtained at 0.5 A g−1 along with outstanding cyclic stability, maintaining 86.3% of its initial capacity after 10,000 cycles (Figure 3f). This work demonstrated the synergistic benefits of combining double-layer capacitance and redox-active pseudocapacitance in hybrid systems.
The synergistic effect of combining multiple redox species was further explored by Xu et al., who investigated a dual-additive system of sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4) and potassium iodide (KI) in H2SO4 (Figure 3g). The overlapping redox potentials of molybdate and iodide ions facilitated efficient charge transfer and contributed to a 17.4-fold increase in specific capacitance. The optimized system delivered an impressive energy density of 65.3 W h kg−1, demonstrating the potential of multi-species electrolytes to achieve higher energy storage capabilities [67].
Meanwhile, Sun et al. explored the use of ferrous ammonium sulfate (FAS) in H2SO4. The Fe2+/Fe3+ redox couple provided stable and reversible pseudocapacitance (Figure 3h), leading to an ultrahigh specific capacitance of 1499 F g−1 and an energy density of 58.7 W h kg−1. The study also emphasized the importance of optimizing the potential window to achieve superior performance, highlighting the critical role of electrolyte engineering in enhancing energy storage [68].
Tian et al. extended this concept by investigating MXene-based symmetric SCs with redox-active KI in H2SO4 (Figure 3i). The addition of KI transformed the positive electrode’s behavior from capacitive to battery-like, enhancing the energy storage capacity and resulting in a volumetric energy density of 33.2 W h L−1. This was a significant improvement over the 14.3 W h L−1 observed in pristine H2SO4 [69]. The study demonstrated the synergistic interaction of redox-active halides with advanced materials like MXenes, which are known for their high conductivity and excellent ion intercalation properties.
The integration of inorganic redox-active additives into aqueous electrolytes has demonstrated significant advancements in enhancing energy density, specific capacitance, and cycling stability. Redox species, such as K3Fe(CN)6, NH4VO3, Na2MoO4, KI, and FAS, have shown their ability to supplement traditional EDLC behavior with Faradaic charge storage mechanisms, enabling aqueous SCs to approach the performance of batteries. Hybrid systems, such as those incorporating Br/Br3−and MXene-based electrodes, highlight the versatility of inorganic redox couples in diverse material platforms.
However, several challenges remain in the practical application of redox-active electrolytes. Long-term stability of redox species is a critical concern, as side reactions or chemical degradation can diminish performance over extended cycling. The solubility and optimal concentration of additives must be carefully controlled to avoid saturation or electrode passivation. Furthermore, the compatibility between redox-active species and electrode materials requires further optimization to maximize charge transfer efficiency and minimize parasitic reactions.
Despite these challenges, the strategic design and integration of inorganic redox additives provide a promising pathway for next-generation aqueous SCs. By addressing current limitations and leveraging advanced materials, future research can unlock the full potential of these systems, achieving higher energy density, improved stability, and broader applicability for energy storage technologies.

2.2. Organic Redox Additives in Aqueous Electrolytes

The introduction of organic redox-active additives into aqueous electrolytes has proven to be a powerful strategy for enhancing the energy density of SCs while preserving their inherent advantages of high power density, safety, and environmental compatibility. Compared to inorganic redox species, organic molecules offer substantial design flexibility, enabling tailored redox potentials, enhanced solubility, and improved interaction with electrode materials.
The effectiveness of viologen-based redox systems has been exemplified in multiple studies. Calcagno et al. demonstrated the synergistic impact of combining pentyl viologen (PV) with bromide ions in aqueous electrolytes [70]. By employing CMK-8 electrodes, the system achieved a fine balance between diffusion-based redox reactions and surface adsorption (Figure 4a). The complementary redox activity of viologen and bromide ions extended the voltage window to 1.5 V, which significantly enhanced the system’s energy density while maintaining excellent cycling stability. This dual-phase system illustrated how combining two redox-active species can improve voltage utilization and maximize charge storage capacity.
Building on this, Wang et al. introduced an ambipolar organic radical, TEMPO, as a redox mediator capable of simultaneous oxidation and reduction at opposite electrodes (Figure 4b) [71]. Unlike conventional systems that rely on asymmetric redox activity, TEMPO exhibited symmetric Faradaic reactions, reducing energy losses and enhancing system efficiency. Figure 4c presents the CV profiles of AC electrodes with and without 1 mM TEMPO in different electrolytes at 10 mV s−1, illustrating the ambipolar characteristic of TEMPO and its relationship with the pH values of electrolytes. The electrolyte achieved an energy density of 51 W h kg−1, approximately 2.4 times higher than baseline systems without redox additives, while retaining 96% capacity after 4000 cycles. This ambipolar redox activity highlights the potential of TEMPO derivatives to simplify electrolyte design and optimize energy storage.
Complementary to viologens and radicals, quinone-based redox systems have been explored for their excellent redox kinetics and reversibility. Xu et al. developed a dual redox system integrating hydroquinone (HQ) in the electrolyte and 1,4-dihydroxyanthraquinone (DQ) within the electrode material (Figure 4d) [72]. Figure 4e shows that the specific capacitances of the A regions are the contribution of the electrochemical double-layer capacitor (EDLC), the B regions’ specific capacitances are derived from the theoretical sum of the pseudocapacitance of the C-DQ-1:1 and HQ-20 samples, and the pseudocapacitances of the DQ-HQ-20 sample are evidently higher than those of theoretical values with additional pseudocapacitances in the C regions. This work highlighted the advantage of combining solid-phase and solution-phase redox activity, where electrode-integrated redox species complement the solution-based mediator to maximize charge storage.
The concept of molecular engineering has enabled the design of advanced organic redox-active materials with improved charge transfer kinetics and long-term stability. Xiong et al. synthesized an indole-based conjugated macromolecule exhibiting a reduced HOMO-LUMO gap for faster electron transfer and enhanced stability [73]. Figure 5a presents the redox reaction involved with the BRE0.025M electrolyte, in which the 5,6-dihydroxyindole/5,6-quinoneindole endowed the BRE0.025M electrolyte with redox centers that involved the phenolic hydroxyl group in the 5,6-dihydroxyindole motifs and the quinonoid carbonyl group in the 5,6-quinoneindole motifs. When paired with honeycomb-like porous carbon electrodes, the system achieved exceptional performance, including a specific capacitance of 205 F g−1 at 1000 A g−1 and a power density of 153 kW kg−1 (Figure 5b), with capacitance retention of 97.1% after 20,000 cycles. This work underscores the importance of molecular design strategies in achieving high energy and power densities simultaneously.
The interaction between organic redox molecules and electrode surfaces can be enhanced through surface functionalization. As shown in Figure 5c, ethylenediamine was used to functionalize porous carbon, providing binding sites for redox additives. As shown in Figure 5d, the redox additive HQ was introduced and interacted with the functionalized carbon surface via hydrogen bonds. Zhai et al. demonstrated that amino-functionalized porous carbon electrodes improved the reactivity and stability of HQ in aqueous electrolytes. The functional groups on the electrode surface facilitated hydrogen bonding with HQ molecules, enhancing charge transfer and redox activity. This led to an energy density of 8.8 W h kg−1, a 3.2-fold increase over pristine carbon electrodes, highlighting the synergistic effects of optimized electrode–electrolyte interfaces in enhancing the performance of organic redox systems [74].
Guan et al. further advanced this concept by utilizing 4-hydroxy-TEMPO (4OH-TEMPO) with defect-rich carbon electrodes [75]. The strong interaction between 4OH-TEMPO and the electrode’s defect sites facilitated rapid electron transfer (Figure 5e), enabling a 67% increase in the voltage window and a six-fold improvement in specific capacitance. This study highlights the critical role of tailoring both RMs and electrode structures to achieve optimized energy storage performance.
In summary, organic redox additives, including viologens, ambipolar radicals, quinones, and conjugated macromolecules, have shown significant potential to address the energy density limitations of aqueous SCs. Systems that combine solution-phase and solid-phase redox species, such as hydroquinone–anthraquinone dual systems, or those that exploit symmetric Faradaic reactions, like TEMPO derivatives, illustrate the versatility of organic redox systems. Additionally, molecular engineering and surface functionalization strategies have demonstrated pathways to improve redox kinetics, stability, and charge transfer efficiency. Despite these advancements, challenges such as the chemical stability of organic redox species, solubility limitations, and parasitic side reactions under long-term operation remain unresolved. Future research efforts should focus on designing highly stable redox-active molecules, exploring synergistic redox combinations, and optimizing the electrode–electrolyte interface to fully realize the potential of organic redox additives in next-generation aqueous SCs.
The performance characteristics of several representative aqueous redox electrolyte systems are summarized in Table 1. These data provide a clear comparison of specific capacitance and energy density across different systems, further highlighting the significant potential of redox additives in enhancing the performance of aqueous supercapacitors. Additionally, Table 2 offers an overview and comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of inorganic and organic redox additives specifically used in aqueous electrolytes.

3. Redox-Mediated Non-Aqueous Electrolyte

Non-aqueous electrolytes [36,79], including organic solvent-based and IL systems, offer a significant advantage over aqueous counterparts due to their wide ESW, which can extend beyond 3 V [39,40]. This characteristic enables higher operational voltages, directly contributing to enhanced energy densities in SCs [80]. However, achieving high performance in non-aqueous systems requires overcoming challenges such as lower ionic conductivity, solvent volatility, and compatibility with redox-active species. This section explores recent advancements in redox-mediated non-aqueous electrolytes, with a focus on organic and IL-based systems, to address these limitations and unlock their potential for next-generation energy storage devices.

3.1. Redox-Mediated Non-Aqueous Organic Electrolytes

Redox-mediated non-aqueous organic electrolytes have emerged as a promising solution to enhance energy density in SCs, leveraging the broad voltage windows provided by organic solvents. By introducing redox-active organic mediators, such as viologens, quinones, and radical compounds, these systems can incorporate Faradaic charge storage alongside EDLC. Recent research has focused on the molecular design of redox species to optimize their stability, solubility, and charge transfer efficiency under high-voltage conditions.
Arun Kumar et al. introduced transition-metal-substituted manganese ferrites (Mn0.95Zn0.05Fe2O4) as electrode materials in non-aqueous electrolytes (0.1 M lithium perchlorate/propylene carbonate) [81]. In their study, potassium iodide (KI) was utilized as a redox-active additive, which significantly improved the energy density by providing additional Faradaic charge storage. The system exhibited a high specific capacitance of 829 F g−1 (Figure 6a) and an energy density of 77.5 W h kg−1 in a symmetric pouch cell configuration (Figure 6b). This work demonstrated the potential of redox-active additives to boost the energy performance of non-aqueous electrolytes, but it also highlighted the importance of choosing compatible RMs that can effectively work with electrode materials. The successful integration of KI was crucial in expanding the ESW and improving overall device performance.
Building on these insights, Fang et al. examined the role of PPD as a redox-active mediator in organic electrolyte SCs [82]. PPD’s compatibility with graphene surfaces, aided by its para-positioned amino groups, resulted in enhanced pseudocapacitive behavior and better charge transfer efficiency. The addition of PPD at an optimal concentration of 0.04 mol L−1 increased the specific capacitance to 516 mA h g−1, significantly improving energy density (Figure 6c). The hypothetical image in Figure 6d indicates that the para-amino group of the PPD molecule introduces less steric hindrance during the interaction with the graphene surface and is more conducive to adsorption on the graphene surface than MPD and OPD, providing strong evidence for its role in improving the performance of the supercapacitor. This study not only emphasized the importance of molecular structure in designing redox-active additives but also illustrated how organic molecules could effectively be used to enhance the overall electrochemical performance of non-aqueous systems. By improving the interaction between the redox-active molecules and the electrode surface, this study set the stage for further development in the design of organic RMs.
This line of research was further advanced by Yue Niu et al., who investigated various viologen derivatives as redox-active additives in acetonitrile-based electrolytes [59]. They found that the molecular structure of viologens played a crucial role in determining the overall electrochemical performance. For instance, ethyl viologen (EV) exhibited superior performance compared to benzyl viologen (BV), which was attributed to EV’s smaller molecular size and better compatibility with the electrode pores (Figure 6e). The incorporation of EV led to an increase in specific capacitance to 73.0 mA h g−1 and improved energy density (Figure 6f), while BV, despite its smaller band gap, had lower performance due to its larger size and reduced ionic conductivity (Figure 6g,h). This study reinforced the idea that careful design of redox-active molecules, with a focus on molecular size and structure, is essential to optimizing non-aqueous electrolyte performance.
Another noteworthy contribution came from Ragib Shakil et al., who explored bio-based RMs, such as pivalic acid (PA) and ascorbic acid (AA), in non-aqueous electrolytes (Figure 6i) [83]. This study addressed the growing interest in sustainable energy storage solutions by demonstrating that AA could provide additional pseudocapacitance, enhancing the overall energy storage performance. The system achieved a specific capacitance of 308 F g−1 and an energy density of 15 W h kg−1, which, although lower than synthetic systems, highlighted the potential for bio-based redox additives in environmentally friendly energy storage technologies. The study also underscored the challenges of balancing electrochemical performance with sustainability, suggesting that bio-based additives could serve as an alternative to traditional synthetic RMs.
Wang et al. developed a high-voltage, high-energy-density supercapacitor by incorporating substituted hydroquinone (tetrachlorohydroquinone, TCHQ) as a redox mediator in organic electrolytes and using N-doped activated carbon (NAC 950) as the electrode material (Figure 6j) [84]. TCHQ, with its high redox potential, expands the electrochemical window to 2.7 V by avoiding the formation of quinhydrone-like by-products. The pyrrole nitrogen atoms in NAC 950 act as electrocatalytic centers, promoting the dehydrogenation of TCHQ and enhancing reaction reversibility. At 2.7 V, the device demonstrated a specific capacitance of 140 F g−1, an energy density of 35.7 W h kg−1, and stable cycling performance, retaining 84.3% of its capacitance after 10,000 cycles. This work provides a new strategy for designing high-voltage RMs and emphasizes the role of molecular design and electrode surface optimization.
Non-aqueous organic electrolytes have shown significant promise for improving supercapacitor energy density through redox-active additives, such as organic mediators and transition-metal complexes. These additives help to expand the ESW, thereby increasing the operational voltage and overall energy storage capacity. However, challenges persist in terms of stability, solubility, and compatibility with electrode materials. High-voltage RMs, such as TCHQ, show potential in further extending the voltage window, but issues like side reactions, slow kinetics, and long-term stability need to be addressed. Future research should focus on designing more stable redox-active species, optimizing the interface between electrolytes and electrodes, and improving the scalability and sustainability of these systems for practical supercapacitor applications.

3.2. Redox-Mediated Ionic Liquid Electrolytes

ILs have attracted increasing attention as promising non-aqueous electrolytes for SCs due to their wide ESW, low volatility, and excellent thermal stability [85,86]. These intrinsic properties make ILs suitable for achieving high energy and power densities [87]. To further enhance their performance, redox-active species have been incorporated into ILs, forming redox-mediated ionic liquid electrolytes (RILEs). By introducing reversible Faradaic charge storage mechanisms, RILEs combine the advantages of ILs with the additional energy storage contribution from RMs, such as organic molecules and transition metal complexes. Despite challenges like low ionic conductivity and limited solubility of redox species, recent advancements have demonstrated the versatility and effectiveness of RILEs in enhancing charge storage capacity and expanding the operational voltage window. As summarized in Figure 7, these developments highlight innovative strategies for optimizing redox-active components, paving the way for next-generation high-energy SCs.
Recent research by Navalpotro et al. demonstrated the effectiveness of para-benzoquinone (p-BQ) as a redox-active additive in an IL electrolyte for hybrid SCs [89]. p-BQ introduced a two-step, one-electron reversible redox reaction, significantly enhancing electrochemical performance (Figure 8a). When Vulcan carbon was used as the electrode, the specific capacitance reached 70 F g−1 at 3 V with 0.4 M p-BQ, three times higher than the pure IL electrolyte (Figure 8b). This improvement is attributed to the additional charge storage from Faradaic reactions facilitated by p-BQ. However, when a high-surface-area carbon electrode (Pica carbon) was used, the capacitance increased by only 36%, suggesting that, in electrodes with larger micropores, the accessibility of redox species may be hindered by pore clogging at higher voltages. This highlights the importance of electrode material selection to maximize the benefits of redox-active additives in IL electrolytes.
Ma et al. explored the addition of ferrocene methanol as a redox mediator in a 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium dicyanamide IL electrolyte, using N-doped reduced graphene oxide aerogel (NrGO) electrodes [90]. Ferrocene methanol’s reversible redox reactions at the electrode–electrolyte interface enhanced both Faradaic charge transfer and the electric double-layer formation. The addition of 100 mM ferrocene methanol increased specific capacitance from 76.7 F g−1 to 112.1 F g−1 and specific energy from 23.5 W h kg−1 to 34.2 W h kg−1 (Figure 8c,d). The supercapacitor also showed good cycling stability, retaining 88.1% of its capacitance after 5000 cycles. This study demonstrates the potential of organometallic RMs to enhance the energy and power densities of IL-based SCs.
Expanding on redox-active ILs, Xie et al. synthesized two novel ionic liquids (RILs) by incorporating ferrocene into either the cation or anion [91]. These ferrocene units served as redox-active centers, contributing additional pseudocapacitance. As shown in Figure 8e, for the positive electrode, the charging process has a stage where the potential linearly rises as [FcNTf]⁻ anions fill the double layer (capacitive charging), and then a plateau occurs when the ferrocenyl unit on [FcNTf]⁻ oxidizes to [Fc⁺NTf]0, maintaining a stable potential up to 2 V. The supercapacitor using the RIL with ferrocene on the anion ([EMIm][FcNTf]) exhibited an energy density of 23.7 W h kg−1 at 2.5 V, an 83% increase compared to the unmodified IL (Figure 8f). The redox activity of the ferrocene-functionalized anion helped maintain a stable potential plateau during charging, suppressing self-discharge. In contrast, the RIL with ferrocene on the cation ([FcEIm][NTf2]) showed less improvement due to lower oxidation efficiency. This study emphasizes the role of molecular design in optimizing RILs for supercapacitor applications, suggesting that ferrocene-modified anions may provide better performance.
Previously, the effects of redox additives in non-aqueous organic electrolytes and ionic liquid electrolytes on the performance of supercapacitors have been introduced respectively. Different combinations of electrode materials, electrolytes, and redox additives can lead to varied effects. Table 3 summarizes the performance characteristics of some supercapacitors using non-aqueous redox electrolytes, which is helpful for a clearer comparative analysis of the performance differences among various systems.

4. Redox-Mediated Gel Electrolytes

Solid-state and gel polymer electrolytes [93,94,95,96] (GPEs) represent a promising solution for addressing the safety concerns of liquid electrolytes, offering improved mechanical stability, flexibility, and leakage resistance [97,98,99,100]. However, the energy density of these systems remains limited due to their reliance on EDLC alone. The integration of redox-active species into solid-state or gel electrolytes has emerged as a transformative strategy to introduce Faradaic charge storage, significantly improving energy density while maintaining system integrity.
Park et al. demonstrated a pioneering example of iodine-based RMs in a polymer-gel electrolyte [101]. By introducing potassium iodide (KI) into a flexible, solid-state electrolyte, the authors were able to achieve a three-fold enhancement in capacitance due to the synergistic contribution of KI’s Faradaic redox reactions and the double-layer capacitive behavior of carbon-based electrodes (Figure 9a). What made this work particularly notable was its emphasis on mechanical robustness, as the SC remained operational under extreme bending and twisting conditions (Figure 9b). This study set an important precedent for integrating redox-active species into flexible, wearable energy storage systems. However, it also revealed the challenges associated with iodine dissolution and potential self-discharge, both of which hinder long-term performance. The work highlights the need for stabilizing strategies to retain the redox mediator within the gel matrix.
Building on the concept of redox-active species, Yadav et al. explored the incorporation of organic mediators, specifically hydroquinone (HQ), into a quasi-solid-state GPE (Figure 9c) [102]. The choice of hydroquinone was driven by its well-known reversible redox activity, which provided a substantial boost in capacitance and energy density. By embedding HQ in a polyvinyl alcohol/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVA/PVP) matrix, alongside the IL EMIHSO4, the authors not only achieved a high specific capacitance of 485 F g−1 but also demonstrated excellent electrochemical stability over 5000 cycles (Figure 9d). This work underscored the advantages of organic RMs, such as tunable redox potentials and strong Faradaic contributions, but it also brought to light critical limitations. Hydroquinone, while effective, suffers from solubility issues and gradual molecular degradation, which can compromise the long-term cycling stability of the device. The incorporation of ILs helped alleviate some of these issues by enhancing the ionic conductivity and electrochemical window, yet a more robust redox-active system remains necessary.
To address the inherent limitations of single RMs, Yadav and Hashmi extended their work to a dual redox system comprising diphenylamine (DPA) and potassium iodide (KI) [62]. This non-aqueous gel polymer electrolyte, based on PVDF-HFP and IL BMITFSI, demonstrated a synergistic effect between the two redox additives (Figure 9e). The complementary Faradaic reactions occurring at the positive and negative electrodes enabled the system to achieve an impressive energy density of 73.2 W h kg−1, far exceeding the capabilities of single-additive systems (Figure 9f). This work marked a significant advance by showing that dual-additive systems can overcome the capacity limitations of individual RMs while maintaining high power output. However, the complexity of such systems introduces challenges related to the precise optimization of redox potentials and mitigating potential cross-talk between reactions. The study also highlighted the need for improved understanding of redox mediator interactions within non-aqueous polymer matrices to ensure long-term stability and reproducibility.
Further advancing the field, Yadav et al. introduced a novel plastic-crystal-based GPE incorporating succinonitrile (SN) and hydroquinone in an IL (BMPTFSI) matrix (Figure 9g) [103]. This system not only exhibited excellent thermal stability and flexibility but also achieved a wide ESW, enabling a significant improvement in both capacitance (289 F g−1) and energy density (40 W h kg−1) (Figure 9h). The inclusion of succinonitrile, a plastic crystal known for its high ionic mobility and structural versatility, played a crucial role in enhancing ion transport while maintaining the mechanical integrity of the electrolyte. This work demonstrated the potential of hybrid systems that combine organic RMs with advanced electrolyte materials to achieve high-performance SCs. Nonetheless, challenges such as the cost of ILs and processability of plastic-crystal-based systems remain key barriers to large-scale commercialization.
Collectively, these studies illustrate the significant potential of redox-mediated GPEs in overcoming the energy density limitations of conventional SCs. In order to have a more comprehensive understanding of the application effects of gel redox electrolytes in supercapacitors, Table 4 summarizes some supercapacitors using such electrolytes and their performance characteristics. By introducing redox-active species into gel electrolytes, researchers have successfully combined pseudocapacitive Faradaic reactions with the physical charge storage of electric double-layer capacitors. In gel electrolytes, the gradual degradation and leakage of RMs present significant stability challenges, particularly for organic species. Additionally, the solubility and retention of mediators within the polymer matrix remain critical issues that need to be addressed to minimize self-discharge and capacity fade. Dual-additive systems offer a promising pathway to enhance performance, but their complexity introduces additional concerns regarding reaction optimization and cost. Future efforts should focus on the molecular engineering of RMs to improve stability as well as the development of cost-effective, scalable electrolyte systems. By addressing these challenges, redox-mediated gel electrolytes have the potential to enable next-generation SCs with superior energy density, enhanced cycling life, and broader applicability.
In the realm of supercapacitors, extensive research on electrolyte systems and redox additives has yielded numerous significant findings. Aqueous electrolytes are characterized by their low cost and high ionic conductivity, non-aqueous electrolytes are renowned for their wide voltage windows, and solid-state/gel electrolytes are recognized for their high safety and flexibility. Each of these electrolyte systems presents distinct advantages and application prospects (Table 5). As for redox additives, inorganic additives are typically associated with rapid electron transfer rates, while organic additives offer the advantage of adjustable redox potentials, thereby presenting diverse opportunities for enhancing supercapacitor performance (Table 6).
Notwithstanding these achievements, current research endeavors in this domain are confronted with several challenges. Aqueous electrolytes, despite their cost-effectiveness, are constrained by their narrow voltage windows, which inherently limit the enhancement of energy density. Non-aqueous electrolytes suffer from issues related to ionic conductivity and safety concerns. Additionally, the ionic conduction mechanisms of solid-state/gel electrolytes remain to be further elucidated and optimized. Redox additives, too, face formidable challenges, including stability issues, solubility limitations, and compatibility problems with electrode materials.
Looking towards the future, it is imperative to conduct in-depth investigations into the underlying mechanisms of electrolytes and additives. Leveraging advanced characterization techniques, such as in situ and operando spectroscopy and microscopy, can enable a precise analysis of the intricate relationship between their microstructures and properties. This, in turn, will provide a robust theoretical foundation for the rational design of novel materials. Simultaneously, the development of innovative composite systems holds great promise. For instance, integrating the unique advantages of different electrolyte systems and optimizing the synergistic interactions among additives, electrolytes, and electrode materials represent viable strategies to surmount the existing performance limitations. It is anticipated that, with continued research efforts, the performance of supercapacitors will witness substantial improvement, thereby meeting the ever-increasing demands for high-efficiency energy storage in emerging technologies, such as next-generation electronic devices, advanced electric vehicles, and grid-scale energy storage systems.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this review has highlighted the significant advancements in redox-active electrolytes for SCs, focusing on aqueous, non-aqueous, and solid-state systems. The incorporation of redox-active species across aqueous, non-aqueous, and solid-state systems has significantly advanced SC performance, particularly in achieving higher energy densities. In aqueous electrolytes, the use of inorganic redox additives, such as K3Fe(CN)6, NH4VO3, and KI, has demonstrated remarkable improvements in capacitance and energy density. Organic RMs, like viologens, TEMPO derivatives, and hydroquinones, offer additional flexibility in molecular design, enabling tailored redox potentials and synergistic charge storage behaviors. For non-aqueous electrolytes, high-voltage RMs, including phenylenediamine derivatives and hydroquinone substitutes, have extended the voltage window beyond 3 V, significantly increasing energy density while maintaining stability. Solid-state and gel polymer electrolytes incorporating redox-active species have further addressed safety concerns, offering flexible and robust energy storage solutions suitable for wearable and next-generation energy devices.
Despite these promising developments, critical challenges persist that hinder the practical application of redox-active electrolytes. Issues such as the limited long-term stability of redox species, parasitic side reactions, and solubility constraints remain unresolved. Furthermore, the compatibility between RMs and electrode materials requires further optimization to mitigate self-discharge and improve charge transfer efficiency. In non-aqueous and IL systems, the high cost and limited scalability of advanced electrolytes also pose significant barriers to commercialization.
To overcome these challenges, future research should focus on the rational design of highly stable redox-active molecules with enhanced solubility and minimized side reactions. The exploration of multi-redox additive systems and synergistic combinations of organic and inorganic species offers a promising pathway to further boost energy and power densities. Additionally, advances in interface engineering, molecular-level optimization, and the integration of emerging materials such as MXenes, conductive polymers, and nanostructured carbons will play a pivotal role in achieving high-performance, durable, and cost-effective SCs. Ultimately, redox-mediated electrolytes hold great promise as a transformative strategy to bridge the gap between SCs and batteries, paving the way for next-generation energy storage technologies with superior energy density, long cycling stability, and wide-ranging applicability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G. (Lu Guan), S.J. and F.M.; Investigation, L.G. (Lu Guan), L.G. (Liangliang Guo), H.Y., S.J. and F.M.; Data curation, L.G. (Lu Guan), X.D., J.C., R.W. and Z.Z.; Formal analysis, X.C., X.W. and D.L.; Software, L.G. (Lu Guan), L.G. (Liangliang Guo) and X.L.; Writing original draft, L.G. (Lu Guan), X.W. and F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2022MB100, ZR2024QD124) and was also supported by the Shandong Province University Youth Innovation Team Development Plan (2024KJH159).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huang, J.; Xie, Y.; You, Y.; Yuan, J.; Xu, Q.; Xie, H.; Chen, Y. Rational Design of Electrode Materials for Advanced Supercapacitors: From Lab Research to Commercialization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lamba, P.; Singh, P.; Singh, P.; Singh, P.; Bharti; Kumar, A.; Gupta, M.; Kumar, Y. Recent advancements in supercapacitors based on different electrode materials: Classifications, synthesis methods and comparative performance. J. Energy Storage 2022, 48, 103871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pomerantseva, E.; Bonaccorso, F.; Feng, X.; Cui, Y.; Gogotsi, Y. Energy storage: The future enabled by nanomaterials. Science 2019, 366, 8285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sharma, R.; Kumar, H.; Kumar, G.; Sharma, S.; Aneja, R.; Sharma, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, P. Progress and challenges in electrochemical energy storage devices: Fabrication, electrode material, and economic aspects. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 468, 143706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhou, J.; Yang, F.; Li, H.; Chen, H.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Qiu, Z.; et al. Progress and Perspective: MXene and MXene-Based Nanomaterials for High-Performance Energy Storage Devices. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2021, 7, 2000967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, X.; Lyu, D.; Merlet, C.; Leesmith, M.J.A.; Hua, X.; Xu, Z.; Grey, C.P.; Forse, A.C. Structural disorder determines capacitance in nanoporous carbons. Science 2024, 384, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, J.W.; Adit, G.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.X.; Chua, D.H.C.; Lee, P.S. Optimization Strategies Toward Functional Sodium-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Mater. 2023, 6, e12633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koohi-Fayegh, S.; Rosen, M.A. A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments. J. Energy Storage 2020, 27, 101047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kulova, T.L.; Fateev, V.N.; Seregina, E.A.; Grigoriev, A.S. A Brief Review of Post-Lithium-Ion Batteries. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 7242–7259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, J.J.; Cai, X.Y.; Cai, S.M.; Shao, Y.X.; Hu, C.; Lu, S.R.; Ding, S.J. High-Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries: Recent Progress and a Promising Future in Applications. Energy Environ. Mater. 2023, 6, e12450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muzaffar, A.; Ahamed, M.B.; Deshmukh, K.; Thirumalai, J. A review on recent advances in hybrid supercapacitors: Design, fabrication and applications. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2019, 101, 123–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Najib, S.; Erdem, E. Current progress achieved in novel materials for supercapacitor electrodes: Mini review. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 2817–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Perdana, M.Y.; Johan, B.A.; Abdallah, M.; Hossain, M.E.; Aziz, M.A.; Baroud, T.N.; Drmosh, Q.A. Understanding the Behavior of Supercapacitor Materials via Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy: A Review. Chem. Rec. 2024, 24, e202400007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghosh, S.; Jeong, S.M.; Polaki, S.R. A review on metal nitrides/oxynitrides as an emerging supercapacitor electrode beyond oxide. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 35, 1389–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huo, P.P.; Zhao, P.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Yin, G.C.; Dong, M.D. A Roadmap for Achieving Sustainable Energy Conversion and Storage: Graphene-Based Composites Used Both as an Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reactions and an Electrode Material for a Supercapacitor. Energies 2018, 11, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, L.T.; Zhai, T.Y.; Li, H.Q.; Wang, Y.G. Redox-Mediator-Enhanced Electrochemical Capacitors: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1118–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, L.; Hu, P.; Wei, H. Development of supercapacitor hybrid electric vehicle. J. Energy Storage 2023, 65, 107269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reenu; Sonia; Phor, L.; Kumar, A.; Chahal, S. Electrode materials for supercapacitors: A comprehensive review of advancements and performance. J. Energy Storage 2024, 84, 110698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Z.F.; Tian, J.R.; Yin, Z.F.; Cui, C.J.; Qian, W.Z.; Wei, F. Carbon nanotube- and graphene-based nanomaterials and applications in high-voltage supercapacitor: A review. Carbon 2019, 141, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ishikawa, M.; Dokko, K.; Teng, H.S.; Lindberg, S.; Ajuria, J.; Balducci, A.; Frackowiak, E. Recent Progress in Electrolyte Systems for Supercapacitors. Electrochemistry 2024, 92, 074003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, L.P.; Chen, G.Z. Ionic Liquid-Based Electrolytes for Supercapacitor and Supercapattery. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xiong, C.Y.; Zhang, Y.K.; Ni, Y.H. Recent progress on development of electrolyte and aerogel electrodes applied in supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2023, 560, 232698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dong, W.J.; Xie, M.; Zhao, S.W.; Qin, Q.L.; Huang, F.Q. Materials design and preparation for high energy density and high power density electrochemical supercapacitors. Mat. Sci. Eng. R 2023, 152, 100713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, T.Z.; Zhou, D.; Pang, L.X.; Sun, S.K.; Zhou, T.; Su, J.Z. Perspectives on Working Voltage of Aqueous Supercapacitors. Small 2022, 18, 2106360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qi, Z.; Ren, R.; Hu, J.; Chen, Y.; Guo, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wei, J.; Zhang, H.; Pang, Q.; Zhang, X.; et al. Flexible Supercapacitor with Wide Electrochemical Stable Window Based on Hydrogel Electrolyte. Small 2024, 20, 2400369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qorbani, M.; Chen, K.H.; Chen, L.C. Hybrid and Asymmetric Supercapacitors: Achieving Balanced Stored Charge across Electrode Materials. Small 2024, 20, 2400558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tian, X.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, B. “Water-in-Salt” Electrolytes for Supercapacitors: A Review. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 2501–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lu, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Tian, Z.; Zhu, E.; Yang, L.; Guan, X.; Ren, H.; Wu, J.; et al. A review of advanced electrolytes for supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2024, 103, 114338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, W. Redox-Active Water-in-Salt Electrolyte for High-Energy-Density Supercapacitors. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 1266–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Y.; Dou, Q.; Yang, J.; Huang, C.; Tang, P.; Xue, S.; Tang, A.; Yu, X.; Cao, Y.; Yan, X. CO2-regulated, ultrahigh-concentration aqueous electrolytes for high energy and power of supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 496, 154007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, S.; Li, Z.; Li, P.; Du, X.; Ma, M.; Liang, Z.; Su, Y.; Xiong, L. Ultrahigh-voltage aqueous electrolyte for wide-temperature supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 15532–15539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Neto, C.; Pham, H.T.T.; Omnée, R.; Canizarès, A.; Slodczyk, A.; Deschamps, M.; Raymundo-Piñero, E. Exploring the Carbon/Electrolyte Interface in Supercapacitors Operating in Highly Concentrated Aqueous Electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 44405–44418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Frajnkovič, M.; Likitchatchawankun, A.; Douard, C.; Zhou, Y.; Baek, S.W.; Catton, I.; Crosnier, O.; Brousse, T.; Pilon, L. Calorimetry can detect the early onset of hydrolysis in hybrid supercapacitors with aqueous electrolytes. J. Power Sources 2022, 548, 232069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gong, X.; Xu, H.; Zhang, M.; Cheng, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yan, H.; Dai, Y.; Zheng, J.-C. 2.4 V high performance supercapacitors enabled by polymer-strengthened 3 m aqueous electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2021, 505, 230078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, J.; Lu, X. Effects of current collectors on the self-discharge rates of supercapacitors with aqueous electrolyte. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2024, 182, 108691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Apparla, N.; Manickavasakam, K.; Sharma, C.S. Augmenting the supercapacitive performance of candle soot-derived activated carbon electrodes in aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes. J. Energy Storage 2023, 73, 109162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, A.; Rawat, P.; Mahanty, B.N.; Mohanty, P. Nitrogen-enriched nanoporous polytriazine as efficient electrode material for high-performance supercapacitor application in non-aqueous medium with high cyclic stability. J. Energy Storage 2024, 96, 112650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lan, S.; Yu, C.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, J.; Qiu, J. Recent Advances in Low-Temperature Liquid Electrolyte for Supercapacitors. Small 2024, 2309286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pappu, S.; Anandan, S.; Rao, T.N.; Martha, S.K.; Bulusu, S.V. High-performance hybrid supercapacitor with electrochemically exfoliated graphene oxide incorporated NiCo2O4 in aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes. J. Energy Storage 2022, 50, 104598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sadavar, S.; Wang, K.J.; Kang, T.; Hwang, M.; Saeed, G.; Yu, X.; Park, H.S. Anion storage for hybrid supercapacitor. Mater. Today Energy 2023, 37, 101388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, P.; Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Gao, M.; Wang, G.; Wang, F.; Wang, Z.; Chen, G.; Yang, S.; et al. Largely Pseudocapacitive Two-Dimensional Conjugated Metal–Organic Framework Anodes with Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital Localized in Nickel-bis(dithiolene) Linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 6247–6256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bagheri, A.; Bellani, S.; Beydaghi, H.; Eredia, M.; Najafi, L.; Bianca, G.; Zappia, M.I.; Safarpour, M.; Najafi, M.; Mantero, E.; et al. Functionalized Metallic 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenide-Based Solid-State Electrolyte for Flexible All-Solid-State Supercapacitors. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 16426–16442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Beknalkar, S.A.; Teli, A.M.; Satale, V.V.; Amate, R.U.; Morankar, P.J.; Yewale, M.A.; Shin, J.C. A critical review of recent advancements in high-temperature supercapacitors: Thermal kinetics, interfacial dynamics, employed strategies, and prospective trajectories. Energy Storage Mater. 2024, 66, 103217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cho, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y. Lithium polymer supercapacitors with water-processable branched poly(ethylene imine)-based solid-state electrolytes. J. Energy Storage 2023, 57, 106010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liew, J.; Liu, L.; Loh, K.H.; Bashir, S.; Ramesh, K.; Ramesh, S. How viable are MXenes? Recent developments of MXene synthesis and its application in solid-state electrolytes. J. Energy Storage 2024, 84, 110868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Murukadas, D.; Cho, Y.; Lee, W.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y. Lithium supercapacitors with environmentally-friend water-processable solid-state hybrid electrolytes of zinc oxide/polymer/lithium hydroxide. Energy 2024, 290, 129984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Samantaray, S.; Mohanty, D.; Hung, I.M.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Satpathy, S.K. Unleashing recent electrolyte materials for next-generation supercapacitor applications: A comprehensive review. J. Energy Storage 2023, 72, 108352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nandi, P.; Subramaniam, C. Employing Redox-Active Additives for Enhanced Charge Polarization and Twofold Higher Energy Density in Supercapacitor. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 10, 2202052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Akinwolemiwa, B.; Peng, C.; Chen, G.Z. Redox electrolytes in supercapacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A5054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dou, L.; Zhou, S.; Ma, J.; Zhao, C.; Cui, P.; Ye, S.; Feng, P.; Gu, X.; Huang, S.; Tao, X. Organic redox additive incorporated PANI hydrogel electrodes for flexible high-energy-density supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. 2024, 12, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rao, A.; Bhat, S.; De, S.; Cyriac, V.; Rag S, A. Study of [EMIM] [EtSO4] ionic liquid-based gel polymer electrolyte mediated with hydroquinone redox additive for flexible supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2023, 68, 107716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sakita, A.M.P.; Ortega, P.F.R.; Silva, G.G.; Noce, R.D.; Lavall, R.L. Unveiling the performance metrics for supercapacitor electrodes with adsorbed redox additives. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 390, 138803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shanmugapriya, V.; Hariharan, G.; Arunpandiyan, S.; Babu, M.; Bharathi, S.; Selvakumar, B.; Arivarasan, A. Redox additives dependent supercapacitor performances of ZnO/SnO2@MWCNT nanocomposites. Diamond Relat. Mater. 2023, 140, 110482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Surulinathan, A.; Gubendran, H.; Sambandam, B.; Ganapathy, S.; Ayyaswamy, A. Mixed metal oxide-based binder-free electrode and redox additive electrolyte combination for enhanced supercapacitor performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 988, 174164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, N.; Yu, S.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, H.M.; Simon, P.; Jiang, X. Electrochemical Capacitors with Confined Redox Electrolytes and Porous Electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2202380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dubey, P.; Mansi; Holdynski, M.; Deep, A.; Tiwari, U.K.; Nogala, W.; Shrivastav, V.; Sundriyal, S. Unravelling the electrochemistry of Ni-MOF derived nickel phosphide/carbon composite electrode and redox additive electrolyte for high performance supercapacitors. Mater. Today Chem. 2024, 39, 102165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Khalafallah, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Q. Manipulating the overall capacitance of hierarchical porous carbons via structure- and pore-tailoring approach. Carbon 2024, 227, 119250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Santos, M.C.G.; da Silva, D.R.; Pinto, P.S.; Ferlauto, A.S.; Lacerda, R.G.; Jesus, W.P.; da Cunha, T.H.R.; Ortega, P.F.R.; Lavall, R.L. Buckypapers of carbon nanotubes and cellulose nanofibrils: Foldable and flexible electrodes for redox supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 349, 136241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Niu, Y.; Niu, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhi, L. Rational design of viologen redox additives for high-performance supercapacitors with organic electrolytes. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 64, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bhol, P.; Jagdale, P.B.; Barman, N.; Thapa, R.; Saxena, M.; Samal, A.K. Design and fabrication of nickel lanthanum telluride microfibers for redox additive electrolyte-based flexible solid-state hybrid supercapacitor. J. Energy Storage 2023, 65, 107286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, D.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Q.; Liu, P. High performance flexible carbon cloth-based solid-state supercapacitors with redox-mediated gel electrolytes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 583, 152397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yadav, N.; Hashmi, S.A. Energy enhancement of quasi-solid-state supercapacitors based on a non-aqueous gel polymer electrolyteviaa synergistic effect of dual redox additives diphenylamine and potassium iodide. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 18266–18279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sajjad, M.; Khan, M.I.; Cheng, F.; Lu, W. A review on selection criteria of aqueous electrolytes performance evaluation for advanced asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2021, 40, 102729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, K.; Liu, F.; Xue, D.; Komarneni, S. Carbon with ultrahigh capacitance when graphene paper meets K3Fe(CN)6. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sandhiya, M.; Vivekanand; Suresh Balaji, S.; Sathish, M. Unrevealed Performance of NH4VO3 as a Redox-Additive for Augmenting the Energy Density of a Supercapacitor. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 8068–8079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xiaohui, T.; Yu Hui, L.; Bolin, C.; Shan, H. Functionalized carbon nanotube based hybrid electrochemical capacitors using neutral bromide redox-active electrolyte for enhancing energy density. J. Power Sources 2017, 352, 118–126. [Google Scholar]
  67. Dong, X.; Wei, H.; Xiao Na, S.; Peng, C.; Xiang Ying, C. Redox additives of Na2MoO4 and KI: Synergistic effect and the improved capacitive performances for carbon-based supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2016, 341, 448–456. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sun, X.N.; Hu, W.; Xu, D.; Chen, X.Y.; Cui, P. Integration of Redox Additive in H2SO4 Solution and the Adjustment of Potential Windows for Improving the Capacitive Performances of Supercapacitors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 2433–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tian, Y.; Yang, C.; Luo, Y.; Zhao, H.; Du, Y.; Kong, L.B.; Que, W. Understanding MXene-Based “Symmetric” Supercapacitors and Redox Electrolyte Energy Storage. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 5006–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Calcagno, G.; Evanko, B.; Stucky, G.D.; Ahlberg, E.; Yoo, S.J.; Palmqvist, A.E.C. Understanding the Operating Mechanism of Aqueous Pentyl Viologen/Bromide Redox-Enhanced Electrochemical Capacitors with Ordered Mesoporous Carbon Electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 14, 20349–20357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hu, L.; Shi, C.; Guo, K.; Zhai, T.; Li, H.; Wang, Y. Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitor Energized by Adding an Ambipolar Organic Redox Radical into the Electrolyte. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 8214–8218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Xu, D.; Sun, X.N.; Hu, W.; Chen, X.Y. Carbon nanosheets-based supercapacitors: Design of dual redox additives of 1, 4-dihydroxyanthraquinone and hydroquinone for improved performance. J. Power Sources 2017, 357, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xiong, T.; Lee, W.S.V.; Chen, L.; Tan, T.L.; Huang, X.; Xue, J. Indole-based conjugated macromolecules as a redox-mediated electrolyte for an ultrahigh power supercapacitor. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 2441–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhai, D.D.; Liu, H.; Wang, M.; Wu, D.; Chen, X.Y.; Zhang, Z.J. Integrating surface functionalization and redox additives to improve surface reactivity for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 323, 134810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Guan, L.; Zhu, Y.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q.; Teng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; et al. Strong Interaction Between Redox Mediators and Defect-Rich Carbons Enabling Simultaneously Boosted Voltage Windows and Capacitance for Aqueous Supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Mater. 2023, 7, e12658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, X.; Chandrabose, R.S.; Chun, S.; Zhang, T.; Evanko, B.; Jian, Z.; Boettcher, S.W.; Stucky, G.; Ji, X. High Energy Density Aqueous Electrochemical Capacitors with a KI-KOH Electrolyte. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 19978–19985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sandhiya, M.; Suresh Balaji, S.; Sathish, M. Boosting the Energy Density of Flexible Supercapacitors by Redox-Additive Hydrogels. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 11536–11546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chan Hyun, J.; Kwak, J.H.; Yun, Y.S. Microporous waste charcoals for redox-mediated supercapacitors. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 79, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lyu, D.; Märker, K.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, E.W.; Gunnarsdóttir, A.B.; Niblett, S.P.; Forse, A.C.; Grey, C.P. Understanding Sorption of Aqueous Electrolytes in Porous Carbon by NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 9897–9910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shamshina, J.L.; Berton, P. Renewable Biopolymers Combined with Ionic Liquids for the Next Generation of Supercapacitor Materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kumar, A.; Mahanty, B.N.; Rawat, A.; Muhammad, R.; Panigrahi, R.K.; Pradhan, D.; Mohanty, P. Transition-Metal-Substituted Nanoporous Manganese Ferrites Mn0.95M0.05Fe2O4 (M: Co, Cu, and Zn) as Electrode Materials for High-Performance Supercapacitors in Redox-Active Nonaqueous Electrolytes. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 6810–6823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fang, J.; Zhang, X.; Miao, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y. A phenylenediamine-mediated organic electrolyte for high performance graphene-hydrogel based supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 273, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shakil, R.; Shaikh, M.N.; Shah, S.S.; Reaz, A.H.; Roy, C.K.; Chowdhury, A.N.; Aziz, M.A. Development of a Novel Bio-based Redox Electrolyte using Pivalic Acid and Ascorbic Acid for the Activated Carbon-based Supercapacitor Fabrication. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2021, 10, 2220–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, Z.-F.; Yi, Z.; Yu, S.-C.; Fan, Y.-F.; Li, J.; Xie, L.; Zhang, S.-C.; Su, F.; Chen, C.-M. High-Voltage Redox Mediator of an Organic Electrolyte for Supercapacitors by Lewis Base Electrocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 24497–24508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Saha, M.; Kumar, A.; Kanaoujiya, R.; Behera, K.; Trivedi, S. A Comprehensive Review of Novel Emerging Electrolytes for Supercapacitors: Aqueous and Organic Electrolytes Versus Ionic Liquid-Based Electrolytes. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 8528–8552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tang, X.; Xiao, D.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Ding, B.; Dou, H.; Zhang, X. A novel ionic liquid-based electrolyte assisting the high performance of low-temperature supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 18374–18382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Geng, C.; Fan, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Sun, S.; Song, Z.; Liu, N.; Wu, J. High energy density and high working voltage of a quasi-solid-state supercapacitor with a redox-active ionic liquid added gel polymer electrolyte. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 18935–18942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sun, L.; Zhuo, K.; Chen, Y.; Du, Q.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J. Ionic Liquid-Based Redox Active Electrolytes for Supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2203611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Navalpotro, P.; Palma, J.; Anderson, M.; Marcilla, R. High performance hybrid supercapacitors by using para-Benzoquinone ionic liquid redox electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2016, 306, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ma, N.; Kosasang, S.; Phattharasupakun, N.; Sawangphruk, M. Addition of Redox Additive to Ionic Liquid Electrolyte for High-Performance Electrochemical Capacitors of N-Doped Graphene Aerogel. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A695–A703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xie, H.J.; Gélinas, B.; Rochefort, D. Redox-active electrolyte supercapacitors using electroactive ionic liquids. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 66, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Poochai, C.; Sriprachuabwong, C.; Srisamrarn, N.; Chuminjak, Y.; Lomas, T.; Wisitsoraat, A.; Tuantranont, A. High performance coin-cell and pouch-cell supercapacitors based on nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide electrodes with phenylenediamine-mediated organic electrolyte. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 489, 989–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cevher, D.; Cevher, S.C.; Cirpan, A. Gel electrolyte modification on D-A-D type conjugated polymer based supercapacitor. J. Energy Storage 2023, 62, 106962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, S.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; He, W.; Liu, X. Highly Conductive Supramolecular Salt Gel Electrolyte for Flexible Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 56170–56180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lee, H.; Gong, K.; Kang, H.; Jung, G.; Kim, J.Y.; Keum, K.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.W.; Ha, J.S. A flexible, high-energy density, and temperature-tolerant asymmetric supercapacitor based on water-in-salt gel electrolyte. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 960, 170714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mitta, S.B.; Harpalsinh, R.; Kim, J.; Park, H.S.; Um, S.H. Flexible Supercapacitor with a Pure DNA Gel Electrolyte. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2200133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shuaibu, A.D.; Shah, S.S.; Alzahrani, A.S.; Aziz, M.A. Development and assessment of an innovative gel electrolyte using polyvinyl alcohol, lithium sulfate, and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate for advanced supercapacitor performance. J. Energy Storage 2024, 92, 112040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Subrahmanya, S.V.; Yethadka, S.N.; Nagaraja, G.K. Electronic Booster PEDOT:PSS-Enriched Guar Gum as Eco-Friendly Gel Electrolyte for Supercapacitor. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 24610–24615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X. Post-tunable salt gel electrolytes toward flexible supercapacitor switches. J. Energy Chem. 2025, 100, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhao, Z.; Rong, Y.; Cui, P.; Qin, G.; Wang, H.; Huang, X. High elongation, low hysteresis, fatigue resistant gel electrolyte for supercapacitor and strain sensor. J. Power Sources 2024, 622, 235307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Park, Y.; Choi, H.; Lee, D.-G.; Kim, M.-C.; Tran, N.A.T.; Cho, Y.; Lee, Y.-W.; Sohn, J.I. Rational Design of Electrochemical Iodine-Based Redox Mediators for Water-Proofed Flexible Fiber Supercapacitors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 2409–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yadav, N.; Yadav, N.; Hashmi, S.A. Ionic liquid incorporated, redox-active blend polymer electrolyte for high energy density quasi-solid-state carbon supercapacitor. J. Power Sources 2020, 451, 227771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yadav, N.; Yadav, N.; Hashmi, S.A. High-Energy-Density Carbon Supercapacitors Incorporating a Plastic-Crystal-Based Nonaqueous Redox-Active Gel Polymer Electrolyte. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 6635–6649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yadav, N.; Yadav, N.; Singh, M.K.; Hashmi, S.A. Nonaqueous, Redox-Active Gel Polymer Electrolyte for High-Performance Supercapacitor. Energy Technol. 2019, 7, 1900132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Park, J.; Yoo, Y.-E.; Mai, L.; Kim, W. Rational Design of a Redox-Active Nonaqueous Electrolyte for a High-Energy-Density Supercapacitor Based on Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 7728–7735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tu, Q.-M.; Fan, L.-Q.; Pan, F.; Huang, J.-L.; Gu, Y.; Lin, J.-M.; Huang, M.-L.; Huang, Y.-F.; Wu, J.-H. Design of a novel redox-active gel polymer electrolyte with a dual-role ionic liquid for flexible supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 268, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of charge storage mechanisms: (a) battery, (b) electric double-layer capacitor, (c) pseudocapacitor, and (d) redox-mediated supercapacitor [16].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of charge storage mechanisms: (a) battery, (b) electric double-layer capacitor, (c) pseudocapacitor, and (d) redox-mediated supercapacitor [16].
Molecules 30 01764 g001
Figure 2. Redox potentials of various inorganic (a) and organic (b) redox electrolytes used for the construction of redox electrolyte-enhanced electrochemical capacitors [55].
Figure 2. Redox potentials of various inorganic (a) and organic (b) redox electrolytes used for the construction of redox electrolyte-enhanced electrochemical capacitors [55].
Molecules 30 01764 g002
Figure 3. (a) Charge storage mechanisms of graphene paper electrode in the redox-electrolyte system and (b) cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves [64]. (c) Redox reaction mechanism of NH4VO3 as a redox additive in a supercapacitor. (d) Galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) of SSG-2 with H2SO4 and NH4VO3/H2SO4[65]. (e) The schematic illustration of the redox-active electrolyte supercapacitor. (f) Digital image of FCNT electrodes [66]. (g) The electrochemical reaction mechanism of the synergistic effects between Na2MoO4 and KI in the mixed electrolyte [67]. (h) Schematic drawing of the electrochemical reaction mechanism of FAS in the mixed electrolyte [68]. (i) Enhancement strategy for positive electrode in MXene-based symmetric SCs by redox electrolyte introduction [69].
Figure 3. (a) Charge storage mechanisms of graphene paper electrode in the redox-electrolyte system and (b) cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves [64]. (c) Redox reaction mechanism of NH4VO3 as a redox additive in a supercapacitor. (d) Galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) of SSG-2 with H2SO4 and NH4VO3/H2SO4[65]. (e) The schematic illustration of the redox-active electrolyte supercapacitor. (f) Digital image of FCNT electrodes [66]. (g) The electrochemical reaction mechanism of the synergistic effects between Na2MoO4 and KI in the mixed electrolyte [67]. (h) Schematic drawing of the electrochemical reaction mechanism of FAS in the mixed electrolyte [68]. (i) Enhancement strategy for positive electrode in MXene-based symmetric SCs by redox electrolyte introduction [69].
Molecules 30 01764 g003
Figure 4. (a) Performance comparison of aqueous pentyl viologen/bromide redox-enhanced electrochemical capacitors with ordered mesoporous carbon (CMK-8) electrodes [70]. (b) Schematic diagram of the working mechanism of a supercapacitor with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyloxyl (TEMPO) as a bipolar redox mediator. (c) CV profiles of activated carbon (AC) electrodes in electrolyte with TEMPO under different conditions and schematic diagram of TEMPO redox reaction [71]. (d) Schematic diagram of the cooperative effect of 1,4-dihydroxyanthraquinone (DQ) and hydroquinone (HQ) in the carbon nanosheets-based supercapacitor. (e) Electrochemical mechanism of the cooperative effect of DQ and HQ in the DQ-HQ-20 sample [72].
Figure 4. (a) Performance comparison of aqueous pentyl viologen/bromide redox-enhanced electrochemical capacitors with ordered mesoporous carbon (CMK-8) electrodes [70]. (b) Schematic diagram of the working mechanism of a supercapacitor with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyloxyl (TEMPO) as a bipolar redox mediator. (c) CV profiles of activated carbon (AC) electrodes in electrolyte with TEMPO under different conditions and schematic diagram of TEMPO redox reaction [71]. (d) Schematic diagram of the cooperative effect of 1,4-dihydroxyanthraquinone (DQ) and hydroquinone (HQ) in the carbon nanosheets-based supercapacitor. (e) Electrochemical mechanism of the cooperative effect of DQ and HQ in the DQ-HQ-20 sample [72].
Molecules 30 01764 g004
Figure 5. (a) Redox reaction involved with the BRE0.025 M electrolyte. (b) Comparison of energy densities in different systems [73]. (c) Schematic diagram of the interaction and reaction mechanism between ethylenediamine (EDA)-functionalized porous carbon and p-phenylenediamine (PPD)/hydroquinone (HQ). (d) Schematic diagram of the hydrogen bonding interaction between EDA-functionalized porous carbon and PPD/HQ [74]. (e) Schematic diagram of the effect of the interaction between RMs and defect-rich carbons on the voltage window and capacitance of aqueous SCs [75].
Figure 5. (a) Redox reaction involved with the BRE0.025 M electrolyte. (b) Comparison of energy densities in different systems [73]. (c) Schematic diagram of the interaction and reaction mechanism between ethylenediamine (EDA)-functionalized porous carbon and p-phenylenediamine (PPD)/hydroquinone (HQ). (d) Schematic diagram of the hydrogen bonding interaction between EDA-functionalized porous carbon and PPD/HQ [74]. (e) Schematic diagram of the effect of the interaction between RMs and defect-rich carbons on the voltage window and capacitance of aqueous SCs [75].
Molecules 30 01764 g005
Figure 6. (a) CV comparison of Mn0.95Zn0.05Fe2O4 electrode in redox-active electrolyte (red) and non-redox-active electrolyte (black). (b) Specific capacitance performance of Mn0.95Zn0.05Fe2O4 in both electrolytes [81]. (c) The specific capacity of supercapacitor electrodes in 1 mol L−1 MeEt3NBF4 acetonitrile electrolyte with different concentrations of o-phenylenediamine (OPD), m-phenylenediamine (MPD), or p-phenylenediamine (PPD) at a current density of 1 A g−1. (d) Hypothetical illustrations of the interaction between various phenylenediamine molecules and the graphene surface [82]. (e) CV curves of the SCs with different electrolytes at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1. (f) The specific capacity values of SCs using different electrolytes under various current density conditions. (g) Illustration of the redox process of viologen compounds in SCs. (h) Depiction of the compatibility between electrode pores and ions [59]. (i) Chemical structure of PA and redox reaction of AA [83]. (j) Comparison of the electrochemical performance of SCs with different electrolytes at 2.7 V voltage and schematic diagram of the tetrachlorohydroquinone (TCHQ) redox reaction mechanism [84].
Figure 6. (a) CV comparison of Mn0.95Zn0.05Fe2O4 electrode in redox-active electrolyte (red) and non-redox-active electrolyte (black). (b) Specific capacitance performance of Mn0.95Zn0.05Fe2O4 in both electrolytes [81]. (c) The specific capacity of supercapacitor electrodes in 1 mol L−1 MeEt3NBF4 acetonitrile electrolyte with different concentrations of o-phenylenediamine (OPD), m-phenylenediamine (MPD), or p-phenylenediamine (PPD) at a current density of 1 A g−1. (d) Hypothetical illustrations of the interaction between various phenylenediamine molecules and the graphene surface [82]. (e) CV curves of the SCs with different electrolytes at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1. (f) The specific capacity values of SCs using different electrolytes under various current density conditions. (g) Illustration of the redox process of viologen compounds in SCs. (h) Depiction of the compatibility between electrode pores and ions [59]. (i) Chemical structure of PA and redox reaction of AA [83]. (j) Comparison of the electrochemical performance of SCs with different electrolytes at 2.7 V voltage and schematic diagram of the tetrachlorohydroquinone (TCHQ) redox reaction mechanism [84].
Molecules 30 01764 g006
Figure 7. Summary of redox-active components in IL-REs [88].
Figure 7. Summary of redox-active components in IL-REs [88].
Molecules 30 01764 g007
Figure 8. (a) CV of p-benzoquinone (p-BQ) in IL (PYR14TFSI). (b) Specific capacitance vs. scan rate curves of SCs with different electrodes and electrolytes [89]. (c) Calculated specific capacitance via GCDs of different combinations (NrGO with IL, NrGO with IL + FM, and rGO with IL + FM). (d) Ragone plots of NrGO with IL and IL + FM [90]. (e) The positive electrode’s charging potential profile exhibits the processes occurring during charging. (f) CV curves of two-electrode cells containing 80 wt.% IL in acetonitrile [91].
Figure 8. (a) CV of p-benzoquinone (p-BQ) in IL (PYR14TFSI). (b) Specific capacitance vs. scan rate curves of SCs with different electrodes and electrolytes [89]. (c) Calculated specific capacitance via GCDs of different combinations (NrGO with IL, NrGO with IL + FM, and rGO with IL + FM). (d) Ragone plots of NrGO with IL and IL + FM [90]. (e) The positive electrode’s charging potential profile exhibits the processes occurring during charging. (f) CV curves of two-electrode cells containing 80 wt.% IL in acetonitrile [91].
Molecules 30 01764 g008
Figure 9. (a) Schematic representation depicting the Faradaic redox process mediated by the RM and the EDLC effect in the flexible fiber-shaped energy storage system (f-FESS) incorporating RM. (b) SEM and EDX mapping images of the f-FESS utilizing a redox-active KI polymer-gel electrolyte [101]. (c) Schematic diagram of the charge–discharge process of a supercapacitor with a redox-active electrolyte (containing hydroquinone). (d) Contribution of redox processes to the capacitance of the supercapacitor [102]. (e) Schematic illustration of the supercapacitor cell employing a redox-active gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) incorporating dual redox additives (PVDF-HFP/BMITFSI/DPA/KI) and AC electrodes. (f) CV curves of supercapacitor cells with different GPEs (Cell#1–Cell#4) at a 10 mV s⁻¹ scan rate for comparison [62]. (g) The SC cell schematic based on non-aqueous, redox-active GPE and AC electrodes. (h) Comparative CV curves of the capacitor cells (with and without redox-active GPE), recorded at a scan rate 5 mV s−1 [103].
Figure 9. (a) Schematic representation depicting the Faradaic redox process mediated by the RM and the EDLC effect in the flexible fiber-shaped energy storage system (f-FESS) incorporating RM. (b) SEM and EDX mapping images of the f-FESS utilizing a redox-active KI polymer-gel electrolyte [101]. (c) Schematic diagram of the charge–discharge process of a supercapacitor with a redox-active electrolyte (containing hydroquinone). (d) Contribution of redox processes to the capacitance of the supercapacitor [102]. (e) Schematic illustration of the supercapacitor cell employing a redox-active gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) incorporating dual redox additives (PVDF-HFP/BMITFSI/DPA/KI) and AC electrodes. (f) CV curves of supercapacitor cells with different GPEs (Cell#1–Cell#4) at a 10 mV s⁻¹ scan rate for comparison [62]. (g) The SC cell schematic based on non-aqueous, redox-active GPE and AC electrodes. (h) Comparative CV curves of the capacitor cells (with and without redox-active GPE), recorded at a scan rate 5 mV s−1 [103].
Molecules 30 01764 g009
Table 1. Supercapacitors utilizing aqueous redox electrolyte and their performance characteristics.
Table 1. Supercapacitors utilizing aqueous redox electrolyte and their performance characteristics.
Electrode
Materials
ElectrolytesRedox
Additives
Voltage of
Cell (V)
Specific
Capacitance
Energy
Density
Ref.
Carbon fibersKOHKI1.6251 F g−17.1 W h kg−1[76]
Carbon nanotubeNa2SO4KBr1.592.12 F g−128.3 W h kg−1[66]
S doped grapheneH2SO4HQ1.6300 F g−127 W h kg−1[77]
Nanoporous carbonLi2SO4KI, Na2MoO41.0470 F g−165.3 W h kg−1[67]
Porous carbonH2SO45,6-dihydroxyindole
/5,6-quinoneindole
1.4205 F g−18.8 W h kg−1[73]
Waste charcoal carbonKOHPPD1.0512 F g−1--[78]
Table 2. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of inorganic and organic redox additives in aqueous electrolytes.
Table 2. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of inorganic and organic redox additives in aqueous electrolytes.
Additive TypeAdvantagesDisadvantages
Inorganic Redox Additives1. High stability, maintaining stable performance over long periods.
2. Fast redox kinetics, enabling rapid charge and discharge.
3. Relatively low cost for some additives.
1. Fixed redox potential, with poor adjustability.
2. Moderate solubility, and high concentrations may cause saturation and precipitation, affecting performance.
3. Potential poor compatibility with electrode materials, leading to parasitic reactions and reduced capacitor efficiency.
Organic Redox Additives1. Flexible molecular design, allowing for the adjustment of structures to achieve specific redox potentials.
2. High solubility, enabling better dispersion in aqueous electrolytes.
3. Good interaction with electrode materials, which can be further enhanced through surface functionalization.
1. Relatively poor stability, prone to chemical degradation during long-term cycling.
2. High cost for some organic additives.
3. Parasitic side reactions may occur, reducing energy efficiency and cycle life.
Table 3. Supercapacitors utilizing non-aqueous redox electrolyte and their performance characteristics.
Table 3. Supercapacitors utilizing non-aqueous redox electrolyte and their performance characteristics.
Electrode
Materials
ElectrolytesRedox
Additives
Voltage
of Cell
(V)
Specific
Capacitance
Energy
Density
Ref.
Mn0.95Zn0.05Fe2O4LiClO4/PCKI2.8829 F g−177.5 W h kg−1[81]
N-doped activated carbonSBPBF4/PCTCHQ2.7140 F g−135.7 W h kg−1[84]
Reduced graphene oxideTEABF4/ACNPPD3.0340 F g−177.2 W h kg−1[92]
Pica carbon PYR14TSFSIp-BQ3.0156 F g−130 W h kg−1[89]
Activated carbonLiTFSI/ACNEV2.373 mA h g−134 W h kg−1[59]
Activated carbon[FcEIm][NT]/ACNFerrocene2.5--13.2 W h kg−1[91]
N-doped reduced graphene oxide aerogel[BMP][DCA]Ferrocene methanol3.0112.1 F g−134.2 W h kg−1[90]
Table 4. Supercapacitors utilizing gel redox electrolyte and their performance characteristics.
Table 4. Supercapacitors utilizing gel redox electrolyte and their performance characteristics.
Electrode
Materials
ElectrolytesRedox
Additives
Voltage
of Cell
(V)
CapacitanceEnergy
Density
Ref.
Carbon fiberH3PO4/KI/PVAKI1.0461.8 F L−164.14 mW h L−1[101]
Activated carbonPVA/PVP/EMIHSO4HQ1.2485 F g−124.7 W h kg−1[102]
Activated carbonPVDF-HFP/BMITFSINaI1.5334 F g−126.1 W h kg−1[104]
Activated carbonPVDF-HFP/SN/BMPTFSIHQ2.0289 F g−140 W h kg−1[103]
Carbon nanotubesEMImTFSI/ADNDmCc/DmCcPF63.157.1 F g−175.6 W h kg−1[105]
Activated carbonPVA/Li2SO4BMIMI1.5384.1 F g−129.3 W h kg−1[106]
Table 5. Comparison of electrolyte systems.
Table 5. Comparison of electrolyte systems.
Electrolyte
System
CharacteristicsIonic
Conductivity
Voltage
Window
CostSafetyApplication
Scenarios
Aqueous
Electrolytes
High ionic conductivity;
Environmentally friendly;
Low cost
HighNarrowLowHighLarge-scale energy storage,
cost-sensitive applications
Non-aqueous
Electrolytes
Wide voltage window;
High energy density;
High-voltage operation
ModerateWideHighMediumHigh-performance energy storage devices
Solid-state/gel ElectrolytesHigh safety;
Good mechanical stability;
Flexibility
LowWideMediumHighWearable devices,
flexible electronics
Table 6. Comparison of redox additive types.
Table 6. Comparison of redox additive types.
Additive TypeCharacteristicsRedox PotentialStabilitySolubilityCommon Additives
Inorganic AdditivesHigh stability;
Fast redox kinetics
Fixed potentialHighModerateK3Fe(CN)6, NH4VO3, Na2MoO4, KI, FeSO4•(NH4)2SO4•6H2O, TiO2, etc.
Organic AdditivesFlexible molecular design;
High solubility
Tunable potentialModerateHighHQ, TEMPO, TCHQ, OPD, MPD, PPD, etc.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guan, L.; Guo, L.; Yao, H.; Cai, J.; Dong, X.; Wang, R.; Zhai, Z.; Chen, X.; Wei, X.; Li, D.; et al. Redox Additive Electrolytes for Supercapacitors: A Mini-Review on Recent Developments and Future Directions. Molecules 2025, 30, 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081764

AMA Style

Guan L, Guo L, Yao H, Cai J, Dong X, Wang R, Zhai Z, Chen X, Wei X, Li D, et al. Redox Additive Electrolytes for Supercapacitors: A Mini-Review on Recent Developments and Future Directions. Molecules. 2025; 30(8):1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guan, Lu, Liangliang Guo, Haiyuan Yao, Jun Cai, Xuewei Dong, Ruonan Wang, Zhihua Zhai, Xuan Chen, Xiuzhi Wei, Dajin Li, and et al. 2025. "Redox Additive Electrolytes for Supercapacitors: A Mini-Review on Recent Developments and Future Directions" Molecules 30, no. 8: 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081764

APA Style

Guan, L., Guo, L., Yao, H., Cai, J., Dong, X., Wang, R., Zhai, Z., Chen, X., Wei, X., Li, D., Liu, X., Ji, S., & Meng, F. (2025). Redox Additive Electrolytes for Supercapacitors: A Mini-Review on Recent Developments and Future Directions. Molecules, 30(8), 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30081764

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop