Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
IJMSInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

31 August 2020

Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns and Their Signaling Pathways in Primary Blast Lung Injury: New Research Progress and Future Directions

,
,
,
and
1
Institute of Disaster Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Disaster Medicine Technology, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ning Li and Chenhao Geng contributed equally to this work.
This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology

Abstract

Primary blast lung injury (PBLI) is a common cause of casualties in wars, terrorist attacks, and explosions. It can exist in the absence of any other outward signs of trauma, and further develop into acute lung injury (ALI) or a more severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The pathogenesis of PBLI at the cellular and molecular level has not been clear. Damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) is a general term for endogenous danger signals released by the body after injury, including intracellular protein molecules (HMGB1, histones, s100s, heat shock proteins, eCIRP, etc.), secretory protein factors (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, VEGF, complements, etc.), purines and pyrimidines and their derived degradation products (nucleic acids, ATP, ADP, UDPG, uric acid, etc.), and extracellular matrix components (hyaluronic acid, fibronectin, heparin sulfate, biglycan, etc.). DAMPs can be detected by multiple receptors including pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). The study of DAMPs and their related signaling pathways, such as the mtDNA-triggered cGAS-YAP pathway, contributes to revealing the molecular mechanism of PBLI, and provides new therapeutic targets for controlling inflammatory diseases and alleviating their symptoms. In this review, we focus on the recent progress of research on DAMPs and their signaling pathways, as well as the potential therapeutic targets and future research directions in PBLI.

1. Introduction

Explosions often occur in modern wars, terrorist attacks, or daily emergencies, and blast injury is a common cause of casualties [1,2]. At the moment of explosion, the explosive materials almost instantaneously convert from solid or liquid into gas. Gas expands rapidly from the explosion point and displaces the surrounding medium to create a blast overpressure (BOP), which transfers a large amount of energy to the surrounding medium to form the blast pressure wave [3]. Generally speaking, blast injuries can be divided into 4 categories, including primary (injury from direct effect of blast pressure wave), secondary (fragmentation injury), tertiary (injury caused by bodily displacement or building collapse) and quaternary (includes burn injury and inhalation of toxic substances) [3,4,5,6,7]. Furthermore, some research proposed quinary injuries, but the specific content has not reached a consensus [3,5,6,8]. In these types of injuries, primary blast injury (PBI) is a potentially life threatening, multi-system disease [4,8]. The previous common view was that blast waves mainly exert force at the air-tissue interfaces within the body. Therefore, organ systems with high air content, such as the auditory systems, pulmonary and gastrointestinal, are most likely affected by PBI [3]. Among them, lungs may be particularly susceptible to blast waves given tissue-density gradients [9]. Although recent studies indicated that blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) may be more common than previously believed [4,10], primary blast lung injury (PBLI) is still worthy of attention. The blast wave-induced acute lung injuries (ALI) are generally closed wounds rather than traditional penetrating wounds, which can be sustained in the absence of any other external signs of thoracic trauma [6]. However, it may further develop into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a more severe physiological expression of ALI [11]. Although the current research on the pathophysiological characteristics of PBLI has been relatively clear, the mechanisms at the cellular and molecular levels are still not fully understood. Damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) was first proposed by Land in 2003 [12]. It is the general term for endogenous risk signals released by the organism after injury, which can trigger non-infectious and uncontrolled inflammation in the body [13,14], aggravating the lung tissue damage after an explosion [15]. This review will focus on DAMPs and their signaling pathways related to PBLI, and explore possible therapeutic targets in future clinical treatment.

2. Overview of Primary Blast Lung Injury

2.1. The Mechanism of Primary Blast Lung Injury

PBLI is mainly caused by the blast wave directly passing through the chest wall, which dissipates kinetic energy in the lung tissue and causes ALI [5]. In 1950, Schardin described three types of explosive forces that can cause injury: spallation, implosion, and inertia [16]. The model of normal alveolar capillaries is shown in Figure 1a. Spallation is defined as the displacement and fragmentation of the dense medium into a less dense medium (Figure 1b). Implosion is caused by the sharply reduced alveolar volume due to the high compression of air in the alveoli by overpressure wave, and then the alveoli re-expand rapidly by underpressure wave (Figure 1c). Inertia refers to the shear force produced by shock waves propagating at different speeds through different density tissues [3,17,18]. These three forces work together to cause pulmonary hemorrhage and contusion, and once the air in the alveoli enters the pulmonary circulation, it may cause air embolism, resulting in a series of symptoms such as pulmonary edema, pneumothorax, and interstitial emphysema [19,20]. The description of these three injury mechanisms is based on the blast wave generated by open air explosions. The extent to which these forces actually cause damage is not completely clear [3]. Furthermore, research shows that the reflection of blast waves in confined spaces will significantly enhance their effects and further aggravate the injury [18].
Figure 1. Damage mechanism of blast lung injury. (a) Normal alveolar capillaries. (b) Schematic diagram of spallation. Alveolar hemorrhage causes the release of cytokines and chemokines. (c) Schematic diagram of implosion. Air in the alveoli enters the pulmonary circulation, causing air embolism.

2.2. Pathophysiological Characteristics and Clinical Diagnosis of Primary Blast Lung Injury

The blast wave causes the rupture of alveolar capillaries, resulting in the presence of free hemoglobin (Hb) and extravasated blood in the lung tissue, induction of free radical reactions that cause oxidative damage, initiation and augmentation of a pro-inflammatory response [5,21]. Furthermore, leucocytes can be demonstrated at the hemorrhagic areas within 3 h after blast exposure, and their levels increase at 24 h or more [22]. Histological examination reveals obvious perivascular edema and massive alveolar hemorrhage within the first 12h, followed by damage to epithelial cells (at 12–24 h) and endothelial cells (at 24–56 h) [23].
Clinically, patients with PBLI often have dyspnea, shallow and frequent breathing [24]. In chest imaging, PBLI appears as ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation, and bilateral fluffy infiltrates that resemble a “butterfly” or “bat wing” [4,25]. In addition, alveolar hemorrhage, laceration of lung parenchyma, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, and hemothorax can also be observed [25,26].

2.3. The Medical Treatment of Primary Blast Lung Injury

After an explosion incident, the emergency personnel should first identify whether there is the risk of PBLI according to the place where the explosion occurred and the distance between the wounded and the center of explosion [5]. It is imperative to perform pre-hospital first aid, and notify the relevant department staff in advance to make relevant preparations, so as to ensure the smooth progress of follow-up treatment [4]. The current in-hospital treatment strategies for PBLI mainly include fluid resuscitation, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, etc. [27,28,29], and can be combined with drugs that inhibit inflammatory factors, scavenge oxygen free radicals, relieve smooth muscle spasm, and improve lung ventilation [30]. These interventions aim to control the development of the disease and maintain the vital signs of patients. In addition, the application of new biotechnology such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of PBLI has become a research hotspot in recent years [31,32]. However, due to insufficient research on the molecular mechanism of PBLI, there is no specific medicine for the treatment of PBLI. Therefore, the study of DAMPs in PBLI is of great significance for exploring potential therapeutic targets and developing targeted treatment methods.

3. DAMPs and Their Sensing Receptors

3.1. Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern

The immune system defends our body with the mechanism of “self versus non-self” recognition. However, it can be activated not only by exogenous “non-self” substances, but also by endogenous DAMPs [33]. DAMPs are numerous intracellular molecules with physiological functions, which exist in the nucleus, mitochondria, or cytoplasm [34,35,36]. Under normal physiological conditions, DAMPs cannot be recognized by the immune system, but they are released when cells die or are subjected to stress [37,38].
When released into the extracellular environment, DAMPs can activate innate immune cells, such as polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), natural killer cells (NKs), macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs), as well as non-immune cells, such as epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts [39]. The activation of these cells results in the release of various cytokines and chemokines, which further recruit inflammatory cells and activate adaptive immune responses. In addition, some DAMPs can directly activate adaptive immune cells to generate immune responses. Whereas the local inflammatory response plays an important role in tissue repair and regeneration, excessive or persistent inflammation may also lead to a systemic and uncontrolled inflammatory response inducing remote organ failure [40].

3.2. DAMP-Sensing Receptors

DAMPs released by injured organs, tissues, or cells can be detected by multiple receptors including pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) (Figure 2), which can, in turn, activate multiple pathways to regulate the inflammatory response. Moreover, one DAMP may bind to a variety of receptors and participate in different pathways [40].
Figure 2. Relationship between DAMPs and their sensing receptors and the activation of different types of cells. DAMPs are released from cells which are dead or stressed due to tissue injury, and include intracellular protein molecules, secreted protein factors, purine and pyrimidine molecules, and their derived degradation products (DDPs) and extracellular matrix components. They activate downstream signaling pathways by recognizing their sensing receptors to activate innate immune cells or non-immune cells, then adaptive immune cells, and also directly activate adaptive immune cells to initiate inflammatory response. Different cellular populations communicate with each other through cytokines and chemokines.

3.2.1. Pattern Recognition Receptors Bound by Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns

PRRs are expressed by innate immune cells such as PMNs, NKs, macrophages, and DCs, and mainly include toll-like receptors (TLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), and multiple cytoplasmic DNA sensors (CDSs) [41]. TLRs recognize DAMP molecules and participate in inflammatory response [42]. NLRs promote the activation of inflammatory bodies [43]. RLRs are one of the main receptor families for sensing viral RNA [44]. The main function of CLRs is to induce pro-inflammatory response [45]. CDSs play essential roles in the development of inflammatory diseases and tumors [46].
1. Toll-like receptors
TLRs are located on the cell surface or inside the cell, and can recognize DAMPs such as nucleic acids, HMGB1, heat shock proteins (HSPs), and S100 proteins. Most TLRs (except TLR3) are recruited by myeloid differentiation protein 88 (MyD88) -dependent IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK), which then activates nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) to promote inflammatory response by upregulating the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and IL-8 [40,47]. TLR3 participates in the inflammatory response through TRIF dependent pathway [42].
2. NOD-like receptors
NLRs are PRRs located in the cytoplasm, which can recruit pro-caspase-1 to start the assembly of inflammatory bodies after being activated by DAMPs such as ATP and oxidized mitochondrial DNA (ox-mtDNA), thereby inducing apoptosis and secretion of IL-1β, IL-18 and other cytokines through the activation of caspase-1 [43,48].
3. Retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors
The RLR family includes RIG-I, MDA5, and LGP2, which can distinguish between exogenous RNA and endogenous RNA to resist pathogens [44]. It can sense DAMPs such as endogenous 5′ppp RNA and unedited long self-dsRNA in vivo, and promote the production of type I interferon (IFN-I) and other cytokines and chemokines [49,50].
4. C-type lectin receptors
Some members of the CLR family, such as macrophage-inducible C-type lectin (MINCLE) and dendritic cell natural killer lectin group receptor 1 (DNGR1), are related to the development of inflammation diseases after binding to DAMPs. DNGR1 is a DC receptor which can be activated by F-actin to downregulate the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in DCs and aggravate the inflammatory response [51]. MINCLE binds to SAP130 protein to induce pro-inflammatory response [45].
5. Cytoplasmic DNA sensors
Cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS) and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) are two important DNA sensors in the cytoplasm, which play essential roles in the development of inflammatory diseases and tumors [52,53]. Some studies have shown that self-DNA, produced by immunogenic cell death or nuclear DNA damage, can activate AIM2 or cGAS and promote the production of IFN-I and other cytokines and chemokines [46].

3.2.2. Other Receptors/Channels Bound by DAMPs

In addition to PRRs, DAMPs can activate receptors including triggering receptors expressed on myeloid cells (TREMs), receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), several G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and ion channels [41]. TREM activation causes cytokine secretion, leading to inflammation response. The interaction between 35 kDa transmembrane receptor RAGE and its ligands also leads to the activation of pro-inflammatory genes [54,55]. GPCRs are known as seven-(pass)-transmembrane receptors and involved in many diseases via the cAMP or the phosphatidylinositol signal pathway [56]. Ion channels trigger the production of NLRP3 inflammasome and participate in the inflammatory response [57].
1. Triggering receptors expressed on myeloid cells
TREM1 and TREM2 are cell surface innate immune receptors which act as members of the immunoglobulin variable (IgV) domain receptor superfamily [58]. TREM1 is expressed on myeloid cells, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts, and interacts with DAMPs such as HMGB1, HSP70, and actin to promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [59,60]. TREM2 is highly expressed in myeloid cells such as DCs, monocytes, and macrophages, and binds to DAMPs such as HSP60, apolipoproteins (APOJ and APOE), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) to regulate cell differentiation, phagocytosis, chemotaxis, and other processes, and participate in inflammatory diseases [61,62].
2. Receptor for advanced glycation end products
RAGE is a transmembrane protein that belongs to the immunoglobulin receptor superfamily and is expressed by multiple cell types, including neutrophils, monocytes, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and cancer cells, and mediates cell response to DAMPs such as HMGB1, S100 proteins, advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and DNA to promote the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, as well as cell migration, proliferation, and apoptosis [63].
3. G-protein-coupled receptors
Various DAMPs can also promote inflammation via GPCRs. The N-formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) can recognize endogenous N-formylated peptides and promote the chemotaxis of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages [64]. P2Y receptors (P2YRs) can sense extracellular nucleotides and promote the migration and activation of multifarious immune cells [65]. Calcium-sensing receptors (CaSRs) and G-protein-coupled receptor family C group 6 member A (GPRC6A) can recognize extracellular Ca2+, promote monocyte/macrophage recruitment and the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome [66].
4. Ion channels
Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and P2X receptors are two types of ligand-gated ion channels, which can promote the production of cytokines and chemokines and the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome by recognizing mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ATP, respectively, and participate in the inflammatory response [57,67].

3.3. Crosstalk Between DAMP and Their Sensing Receptors

In summary, DAMPs can bind to related receptors or channel proteins and activate downstream signaling pathways, leading to large-scale cytokine release, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, TNF-α, and type I/type II IFN. These mediators enhance the activation, maturation, proliferation, and recruitment of immune cells at the injured regions, leading to the indirect activation of innate and adaptive immune cells (such as DCs or T cells) (Figure 2).

5. Conclusions

PBLI is essentially an acute lung injury caused by overpressure mechanical force. After PBLI, DAMPs are released from the necrotic or stressed cells to recruit the effector cells, which release cytokines, and then enter the acute exudative phase of ALI. With the release of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, etc.) and chemokines (CXC, CC, CX3C, etc.) and with the generous activation of inflammatory leukocytes, alveolar capillary membrane damage and type I alveolar epithelial cell necrosis appear and inflammatory exudates gather in the lung stroma, resulting in acute pulmonary edema and acute respiratory failure, which can further develop into more serious ARDS [78]. DAMPs are “danger” signals emitted by the body after injury and trigger inflammatory responses, implicated in local tissue repair. However, the imbalance of inflammatory response can cause pathological inflammation and related diseases. Although the research on DAMPs and their signaling pathways in the field of lung injury-related inflammatory response has been comprehensive, the research in the field of PBLI is still in its infancy. There is still a lot of work to verify the role of existing DAMPs in PBLI, such as ECM components, HSPs, nucleic acids, ATP, etc. It is also necessary to explore and discover new unique DAMPs relevant to PBLI. In the future, the in-depth interpretation of the molecular mechanism of DAMPs and their downstream signaling pathways in PBLI can provide new treatment avenues and targets for controlling the inflammatory response and alleviating the patient’s condition after lung injury caused by blast waves.

Author Contributions

All authors performed the independent systemic literature review and identified the studies to be included in this review. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants awarded to Haojun Fan by the Key Project of Applied Basic Research of Logistics Support Department of the People’s Liberation Army of China (BLB19J006); and the Tianjin University “Double first class” construction talent start-up fund awarded to Dr.Yanhua Gong.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

AECsAlveolar Epithelial Cells
AGEsAdvanced Glycation End Products
AIM2Absent in Melanoma 2
ALIAcute Lung Injuries
ARDSAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
ASCApoptosis-Associated Speck-Like Protein
ASK1Apoptosis Signal-Regulating Kinase-1
ATPAdenosine Triphosphate
BALFBronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
BGNBiglycan
BOPBlast Overpressure
bTBIBlast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury
CaSRsCalcium-Sensing Receptors
CDSsCytoplasmic DNA Sensors
cGAMPCyclic GMP-AMP
cGASGMP–AMP Synthase
CLRsC-Type Lectin Receptors
ComCComplement Cascade
COVID-19Coronavirus Disease 2019
CRSCytokine Release Syndrome
CSIFCytokine Synthesis Inhibitory Factor
DAFDecay-Accelerating Factor
DAMPDamage-Associated Molecular Pattern
DCsDendritic Cells
DDPsDerived Degradation Products
DNGR1Dendritic Cell Natural Killer Lectin Group Receptor 1
eCIRPExtracellular Cold-Inducible RNA-Binding Protein
ECMExtracellular Matrix
FEFat Embolism
FPRsN-Formyl Peptide Receptors
GGOGround-Glass Opacity
GPCRsG-Protein-Coupled Receptors
GPRC6AG-Protein-Coupled Receptor Family C Group 6 Member A
HAHyaluronic Acid
HbHemoglobin
HCVECsHuman Coronary Vascular Endothelial Cells
HMGB1High Mobility Group Box 1
HMW-HAHigh Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid
HSPsHeat Shock Proteins
ICAMIntercellular Adhesion Molecule
IFN-IType I Interferon
IFN-αInterferon-Alpha
IgVImmunoglobulin Variable
IL-10R1IL-10 Receptor 1
IL-1raIL-1 receptor antagonist
IL-6Interleukin 6
IL-6RInterleukin-6 Receptor
iNOSInducible Nitric Oxide Synthase
IRAKIL-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase
IRIIschemia/Reperfusion Injury
JNKC-Jun N-Terminal Kinase
LATS1/2Large Tumor Suppressor Kinase 1/2
LDLLow-Density Lipoprotein
LMW-HALow Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid
LPSLipopolysaccharide
MBLMannan-Binding Lectin
MCPMonocyte Chemoattractant Protein
MINCLEMacrophage-Inducible C-type Lectin
MOFMultiple Organ Failure
MSCsMesenchymal Stem Cells
mtDNAMitochondrial DNA
MyD88Myeloid Differentiation Protein 88
NETNeutrophil Extracellular Trap
NF-kBNuclear Factor-κB
NKsNatural Killer Cells
NLRsNOD-Like Receptors
ox-mtDNAOxidized Mitochondrial DNA
P2X7RP2X7 Receptor
P2YRsP2Y Receptors
PBIPrimary Blast Injury
PBLIPrimary Blast Lung Injury
PFCPerfluorocarbon
PKRDouble-Stranded RNA-Dependent Protein Kinase
PLGFPlacental Growth Factor
PMNsPolymorphonuclear Neutrophils
PRRsPattern Recognition Receptors
RAGEReceptor for Advanced Glycation End Products
RIG-IRetinoic Acid-Inducible Gene-I
RLRsRetinoic Acid-Inducible Gene-I Like Receptors
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
S100sS100 Proteins
SOFASequential Organ Failure Assessment
STINGStimulator of Interferon Genes
TAZTranscriptional Coactivator with PDZ-Binding Motif
TBK1TANK-Binding Kinase 1
TLRsToll-Like Receptors
TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor-α
TREMsTriggering Receptors Expressed on Myeloid Cells
TRPTransient Receptor Potential
UDPGUridine Diphosphate Glucose
VEGFVascular Endothelial Growth Factor
VEGFRVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor

References

  1. Wild, H.; Stewart, B.T.; LeBoa, C.; Stave, C.D.; Wren, S.M. Epidemiology of Injuries Sustained by Civilians and Local Combatants in Contemporary Armed Conflict: An Appeal for a Shared Trauma Registry Among Humanitarian Actors. World J. Surg. 2020, 44, 1863–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, X.; Du, J.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, Z.G.; Jiang, J.X.; Yang, C. Incidence, casualties and risk characteristics of civilian explosion blast injury in China: 2000–2017 data from the state Administration of Work Safety. Mil. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wolf, S.J.; Bebarta, V.S.; Bonnett, C.J.; Pons, P.T.; Cantrill, S.V. Blast injuries. Lancet 2009, 374, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mathews, Z.R.; Koyfman, A. Blast Injuries. J. Emerg. Med. 2015, 49, 573–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Scott, T.E.; Kirkman, E.; Haque, M.; Gibb, I.E.; Mahoney, P.; Hardman, J.G. Primary blast lung injury—A review. Br. J. Anaesth. 2017, 118, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mackenzie, I.M.; Tunnicliffe, B. Blast injuries to the lung: Epidemiology and management. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sziklavari, Z.; Molnar, T.F. Blast injures to the thorax. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019, 11, S167–S171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Westrol, M.S.; Donovan, C.M.; Kapitanyan, R. Blast Physics and Pathophysiology of Explosive Injuries. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2017, 69, S4–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jani, N.; Falvo, M.J.; Sotolongo, A.; Osinubi, O.Y.; Tseng, C.L.; Rowneki, M.; Montopoli, M.; Morley, S.W.; Mitchell, V.; Helmer, D.A. Blast Injury and Cardiopulmonary Symptoms in U.S. Veterans: Analysis of a National Registry. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017, 167, 753–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fievisohn, E.; Bailey, Z.; Guettler, A.; VandeVord, P. Primary Blast Brain Injury Mechanisms: Current Knowledge, Limitations, and Future Directions. J. Biomech. Eng. 2018, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Butt, Y.; Kurdowska, A.; Allen, T.C. Acute Lung Injury: A Clinical and Molecular Review. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2016, 140, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Land, W. Allograft injury mediated by reactive oxygen species: From conserved proteins of Drosophila to acute and chronic rejection of human transplants. Part III: Interaction of (oxidative) stress-induced heat shock proteins with toll-like receptor-bearing cells of innate immunity and its consequences for the development of acute and chronic allograft rejection. Transplant. Rev. 2003, 17, 67–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zedler, S.; Faist, E. The impact of endogenous triggers on trauma-associated inflammation. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2006, 12, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Relja, B.; Mors, K.; Marzi, I. Danger signals in trauma. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. Off. Publ. Eur. Trauma Soc. 2018, 44, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pandolfi, F.; Altamura, S.; Frosali, S.; Conti, P. Key Role of DAMP in Inflammation, Cancer, and Tissue Repair. Clin. Ther. 2016, 38, 1017–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schardin, H. The Physical Principles of the Effects of a Detonation; German Aviation Medicine, World War II: Department of the US Air Force, Office of the Surgeon General: Washington, DC, USA, 1950; pp. 1207–1224. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ho, A.M. A simple conceptual model of primary pulmonary blast injury. Med. Hypotheses 2002, 59, 611–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yeh, D.D.; Schecter, W.P. Primary blast injuries--an updated concise review. World J. Surg. 2012, 36, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guzzi, L.M.; Argyros, G. The management of blast injury. Eur. J. Emerg. Med. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Emerg. Med. 1996, 3, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ho, A.M.; Ling, E. Systemic air embolism after lung trauma. Anesthesiology 1999, 90, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gorbunov, N.V.; Asher, L.V.; Ayyagari, V.; Atkins, J.L. Inflammatory leukocytes and iron turnover in experimental hemorrhagic lung trauma. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2006, 80, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kirkman, E.; Watts, S. Characterization of the response to primary blast injury. Philos. Trans. R. Soci. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Smith, J.E.; Garner, J. Pathophysiology of primary blast injury. J. R. Army Med. Corps 2019, 165, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peng, L.H.; Guo, G.H. Advances in the research of blast lung injury. Chin. J. Burn. 2016, 32, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Oikonomou, A.; Thiessen, R.; Prassopoulos, P. CT findings in blast lung injury. BMJ Case Rep. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Avidan, V.; Hersch, M.; Armon, Y.; Spira, R.; Aharoni, D.; Reissman, P.; Schecter, W.P. Blast lung injury: Clinical manifestations, treatment, and outcome. Am. J. Surg. 2005, 190, 927–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zheng, X.F.; Zhu, F.; Fang, H.; Xu, D.Y.; Xu, L.; Chen, T.S.; Zheng, Y.J.; Xiao, S.C.; Xia, Z.F. Management of combined massive burn and blast injury: A 20-year experience. Burns. J. Int. Soc. Burn. Inj 2020, 46, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scott, T.E.; Das, A.; Haque, M.; Bates, D.G.; Hardman, J.G. Management of primary blast lung injury: A comparison of airway pressure release versus low tidal volume ventilation. Intensive Care Med. Exp. 2020, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McDonald Johnston, A.; Alderman, J.E. Thoracic Injury in Patients Injured by Explosions on the Battlefield and in Terrorist Incidents. Chest 2020, 157, 888–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Singh, S.K.; Kumar, A.; Katyal, S. A terrorist bomb blast, a real challenge for any tertiary care health provider. Anesth. Essays Res. 2014, 8, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Byrnes, D.; Masterson, C.H.; Artigas, A.; Laffey, J.G. Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Therapy for Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sadeghian Chaleshtori, S.; Mokhber Dezfouli, M.R.; Jabbari Fakhr, M. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: The therapeutic effects in animal models of acute pulmonary diseases. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Relja, B.; Land, W.G. Damage-associated molecular patterns in trauma. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. Off. Publ. Eur. Trauma Soc. 2019, 46, 751–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Patel, S. Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs): The Derivatives and Triggers of Inflammation. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018, 18, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Krysko, D.V.; Agostinis, P.; Krysko, O.; Garg, A.D.; Bachert, C.; Lambrecht, B.N.; Vandenabeele, P. Emerging role of damage-associated molecular patterns derived from mitochondria in inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2011, 32, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Frevert, C.W.; Felgenhauer, J.; Wygrecka, M.; Nastase, M.V.; Schaefer, L. Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns Derived from the Extracellular Matrix Provide Temporal Control of Innate Immunity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. Off. J. Histochem. Soc. 2018, 66, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vénéreau, E.; Ceriotti, C.; Bianchi, M.E. DAMPs from Cell Death to New Life. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bianchi, M.E. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: All we need to know about danger. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007, 81, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, G.Y.; Nuñez, G. Sterile inflammation: Sensing and reacting to damage. Nature reviews. Immunology 2010, 10, 826–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vourc’h, M.; Roquilly, A.; Asehnoune, K. Trauma-Induced Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns-Mediated Remote Organ Injury and Immunosuppression in the Acutely Ill Patient. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gong, T.; Liu, L.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, R. DAMP-sensing receptors in sterile inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Nature reviews. Immunology 2020, 20, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, M.; Wang, H.Y.; Chen, J.C.; Zhao, J. Regulation of airway inflammation and remodeling in asthmatic mice by TLR3/TRIF signal pathway. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 85, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, X.; Lin, G.; Han, Z.; Chai, J. Structural Biology of NOD-Like Receptors. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1172, 119–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Brubaker, S.W.; Bonham, K.S.; Zanoni, I.; Kagan, J.C. Innate immune pattern recognition: A cell biological perspective. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 33, 257–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. De Rivero Vaccari, J.C.; Brand, F.J., 3rd; Berti, A.F.; Alonso, O.F.; Bullock, M.R.; De Rivero Vaccari, J.P. Mincle signaling in the innate immune response after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 2015, 32, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Komada, T.; Chung, H.; Lau, A.; Platnich, J.M.; Beck, P.L.; Benediktsson, H.; Duff, H.J.; Jenne, C.N.; Muruve, D.A. Macrophage Uptake of Necrotic Cell DNA Activates the AIM2 Inflammasome to Regulate a Proinflammatory Phenotype in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018, 29, 1165–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity 2011, 34, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gong, T.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, R. Control of Inflammasome Activation by Phosphorylation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2018, 43, 685–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ablasser, A.; Hur, S. Regulation of cGAS- and RLR-mediated immunity to nucleic acids. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liddicoat, B.J.; Piskol, R.; Chalk, A.M.; Ramaswami, G.; Higuchi, M.; Hartner, J.C.; Li, J.B.; Seeburg, P.H.; Walkley, C.R. RNA editing by ADAR1 prevents MDA5 sensing of endogenous dsRNA as nonself. Science 2015, 349, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Haddad, Y.; Lahoute, C.; Clément, M.; Laurans, L.; Metghalchi, S.; Zeboudj, L.; Giraud, A.; Loyer, X.; Vandestienne, M.; Wain-Hobson, J.; et al. The Dendritic Cell Receptor DNGR-1 Promotes the Development of Atherosclerosis in Mice. Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, X.D.; Wu, J.; Gao, D.; Wang, H.; Sun, L.; Chen, Z.J. Pivotal roles of cGAS-cGAMP signaling in antiviral defense and immune adjuvant effects. Science 2013, 341, 1390–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rathinam, V.A.; Jiang, Z.; Waggoner, S.N.; Sharma, S.; Cole, L.E.; Waggoner, L.; Vanaja, S.K.; Monks, B.G.; Ganesan, S.; Latz, E.; et al. The AIM2 inflammasome is essential for host defense against cytosolic bacteria and DNA viruses. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bierhaus, A.; Schiekofer, S.; Schwaninger, M.; Andrassy, M.; Humpert, P.M.; Chen, J.; Hong, M.; Luther, T.; Henle, T.; Klöting, I.; et al. Diabetes-associated sustained activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB. Diabetes 2001, 50, 2792–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gasparotto, J.; Girardi, C.S.; Somensi, N.; Ribeiro, C.T.; Moreira, J.C.F.; Michels, M.; Sonai, B.; Rocha, M.; Steckert, A.V.; Barichello, T.; et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end products mediates sepsis-triggered amyloid-β accumulation, Tau phosphorylation, and cognitive impairment. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 226–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gilman, A.G. G proteins: Transducers of receptor-generated signals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1987, 56, 615–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moran, M.M.; McAlexander, M.A.; Bíró, T.; Szallasi, A. Transient receptor potential channels as therapeutic targets. Nature reviews. Drug Discov. 2011, 10, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ford, J.W.; McVicar, D.W. TREM and TREM-like receptors in inflammation and disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2009, 21, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tammaro, A.; Derive, M.; Gibot, S.; Leemans, J.C.; Florquin, S.; Dessing, M.C. TREM-1 and its potential ligands in non-infectious diseases: From biology to clinical perspectives. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 177, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ho, C.C.; Liao, W.Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Lu, Y.H.; Huang, H.Y.; Chen, H.Y.; Chan, W.K.; Chen, H.W.; Yang, P.C. TREM-1 expression in tumor-associated macrophages and clinical outcome in lung cancer. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008, 177, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Stefano, L.; Racchetti, G.; Bianco, F.; Passini, N.; Gupta, R.S.; Panina Bordignon, P.; Meldolesi, J. The surface-exposed chaperone, Hsp60, is an agonist of the microglial TREM2 receptor. J. Neurochem. 2009, 110, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yeh, F.L.; Wang, Y.; Tom, I.; Gonzalez, L.C.; Sheng, M. TREM2 Binds to Apolipoproteins, Including APOE and CLU/APOJ, and Thereby Facilitates Uptake of Amyloid-Beta by Microglia. Neuron 2016, 91, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hudson, B.I.; Lippman, M.E. Targeting RAGE Signaling in Inflammatory Disease. Annu. Rev. Med. 2018, 69, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Weiß, E.; Kretschmer, D. Formyl-Peptide Receptors in Infection, Inflammation, and Cancer. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 815–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Idzko, M.; Ferrari, D.; Eltzschig, H.K. Nucleotide signalling during inflammation. Nature 2014, 509, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rossol, M.; Pierer, M.; Raulien, N.; Quandt, D.; Meusch, U.; Rothe, K.; Schubert, K.; Schöneberg, T.; Schaefer, M.; Krügel, U.; et al. Extracellular Ca2+ is a danger signal activating the NLRP3 inflammasome through G protein-coupled calcium sensing receptors. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Di Virgilio, F.; Dal Ben, D.; Sarti, A.C.; Giuliani, A.L.; Falzoni, S. The P2X7 Receptor in Infection and Inflammation. Immunity 2017, 47, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Qu, L.; Chen, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, F.; Huang, H.; He, W.; Zhang, R.; Shen, L. High-Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) and Autophagy in Acute Lung Injury (ALI): A Review. Medical science monitor. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res 2019, 25, 1828–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, R.; Shang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, T.; Xiong, W.; Zou, X. High-mobility group box 1 protein participates in acute lung injury by activating protein kinase R and inducing M1 polarization. Life Sci. 2020, 246, 117415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cohen, M.J.; Brohi, K.; Calfee, C.S.; Rahn, P.; Chesebro, B.B.; Christiaans, S.C.; Carles, M.; Howard, M.; Pittet, J.F. Early release of high mobility group box nuclear protein 1 after severe trauma in humans: Role of injury severity and tissue hypoperfusion. Critical Care 2009, 13, R174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Silk, E.; Zhao, H.; Weng, H.; Ma, D. The role of extracellular histone in organ injury. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Abrams, S.T.; Zhang, N.; Manson, J.; Liu, T.; Dart, C.; Baluwa, F.; Wang, S.S.; Brohi, K.; Kipar, A.; Yu, W.; et al. Circulating histones are mediators of trauma-associated lung injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 187, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hua, X.; Zhang, H.; Jia, J.; Chen, S.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, X. Roles of S100 family members in drug resistance in tumors: Status and prospects. Biomed. Pharmacother. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 127, 110156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Donato, R.; Cannon, B.R.; Sorci, G.; Riuzzi, F.; Hsu, K.; Weber, D.J.; Geczy, C.L. Functions of S100 proteins. Curr. Mol. Med. 2013, 13, 24–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bertheloot, D.; Latz, E. HMGB1, IL-1α, IL-33 and S100 proteins: Dual-function alarmins. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 14, 43–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lorenz, E.; Muhlebach, M.S.; Tessier, P.A.; Alexis, N.E.; Duncan Hite, R.; Seeds, M.C.; Peden, D.B.; Meredith, W. Different expression ratio of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 in acute and chronic lung diseases. Respir. Med. 2008, 102, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chakraborty, D.; Zenker, S.; Rossaint, J.; Hölscher, A.; Pohlen, M.; Zarbock, A.; Roth, J.; Vogl, T. Alarmin S100A8 Activates Alveolar Epithelial Cells in the Context of Acute Lung Injury in a TLR4-Dependent Manner. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tolle, L.B.; Standiford, T.J. Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in acute lung injury. J. Pathol. 2013, 229, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jin, C.; Cleveland, J.C.; Ao, L.; Li, J.; Zeng, Q.; Fullerton, D.A.; Meng, X. Human myocardium releases heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) after global ischemia: The proinflammatory effect of extracellular HSP27 through toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 and TLR4. Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cheng, W.; Li, Y.; Hou, X.; Zhang, N.; Ma, J.; Ding, F.; Li, F.; Miao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, Q.; et al. HSP60 is involved in the neuroprotective effects of naloxone. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 2172–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wong, H.R.; Menendez, I.Y.; Ryan, M.A.; Denenberg, A.G.; Wispé, J.R. Increased expression of heat shock protein-70 protects A549 cells against hyperoxia. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275, L836–L841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Namba, T.; Azuma, A.; Mizushima, T. Heat shock protein 70 protects against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 80, 920–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhong, P.; Huang, H. Recent progress in the research of cold-inducible RNA-binding protein. Future Sci. Oa 2017, 3, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Aziz, M.; Brenner, M.; Wang, P. Extracellular CIRP (eCIRP) and inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 106, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Gurien, S.D.; Aziz, M.; Cagliani, J.; Denning, N.L.; Last, J.; Royster, W.; Coppa, G.F.; Wang, P. An eCIRP-derived small peptide targeting TREM-1 attenuates hemorrhagic shock. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chaudhry, H.; Zhou, J.; Zhong, Y.; Ali, M.M.; McGuire, F.; Nagarkatti, P.S.; Nagarkatti, M. Role of cytokines as a double-edged sword in sepsis. In Vivo 2013, 27, 669–684. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Pedersen, B.K.; Febbraio, M.A. Muscle as an endocrine organ: Focus on muscle-derived interleukin-6. Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 1379–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Scheller, J.; Chalaris, A.; Schmidt-Arras, D.; Rose-John, S. The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6. Biochimica Biophysica Acta 2011, 1813, 878–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pedersen, B.K. Muscle as a secretory organ. Comprehensive Physiology 2013, 3, 1337–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mosser, D.M.; Zhang, X. Interleukin-10: New perspectives on an old cytokine. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 226, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Soderholm, A.T.; Barnett, T.C.; Sweet, M.J.; Walker, M.J. Group A streptococcal pharyngitis: Immune responses involved in bacterial clearance and GAS-associated immunopathologies. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2018, 103, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shurety, W.; Pagan, J.K.; Prins, J.B.; Stow, J.L. Endocytosis of uncleaved tumor necrosis factor-alpha in macrophages. Lab. Investig. J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 2001, 81, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Tong, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cong, P.; Shi, X.; Liu, Y.; Shi Hongxu Jin, L.; Hou, M. Shock waves increase pulmonary vascular leakage, inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in a mouse model. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 243, 934–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhang, Z.; Liang, Z.; Li, H.; Li, C.; Yang, Z.; Li, Y.; She, D.; Cao, L.; Wang, W.; Liu, C.; et al. Perfluorocarbon reduces cell damage from blast injury by inhibiting signal paths of NF-kappaB, MAPK and Bcl-2/Bax signaling pathway in A549 cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, B.; Li, M.; Zhou, Z.; Guan, X.; Xiang, Y. Can we use interleukin-6 (IL-6) blockade for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced cytokine release syndrome (CRS)? J. Autoimmun. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zhang, C.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.W.; Zhao, H.; Wang, G.Q. The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of severe COVID-19 and Interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonist Tocilizumab may be the key to reduce the mortality. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 4, 105954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ferrara, N. VEGF and the quest for tumour angiogenesis factors. Nature reviews. Cancer 2002, 2, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lin, C.K.; Lin, Y.H.; Huang, T.C.; Shi, C.S.; Yang, C.T. VEGF mediates fat embolism-induced acute lung injury via VEGF receptor 2 and the MAPK cascade. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ferrara, N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: Basic science and clinical progress. Endocr. Rev. 2004, 25, 581–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Medford, A.R.; Ibrahim, N.B.; Millar, A.B. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and coreceptor expression in human acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Crit. Care 2009, 24, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kaner, R.J.; Crystal, R.G. Compartmentalization of vascular endothelial growth factor to the epithelial surface of the human lung. Mol. Med. 2001, 7, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Medford, A.R.; Millar, A.B. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): Paradox or paradigm? Thorax 2006, 61, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Qin, M.; Qiu, Z. Changes in TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10 and VEGF in rats with ARDS and the effects of dexamethasone. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 17, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Standiford, T.J.; Ward, P.A. Therapeutic targeting of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Trans. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2016, 167, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Yang, Z.; Aderemi, O.A.; Zhao, Q.; Edsall, P.R.; Simovic, M.O.; Lund, B.J.; Espinoza, M.D.; Woodson, A.M.; Li, Y.; Cancio, L.C. Early Complement and Fibrinolytic Activation in a Rat Model of Blast-Induced Multi-Organ Damage. Mil. Med. 2019, 184, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Chavko, M.; Liu, B.; Aderemi, O.A.; Simovic, M.O.; Dubick, M.A.; Cancio, L.C. Complement inhibition ameliorates blast-induced acute lung injury in rats: Potential role of complement in intracellular HMGB1-mediated inflammation. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wu, G.; Zhu, Q.; Zeng, J.; Gu, X.; Miao, Y.; Xu, W.; Lv, T.; Song, Y. Extracellular mitochondrial DNA promote NLRP3 inflammasome activation and induce acute lung injury through TLR9 and NF-κB. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019, 11, 4816–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Huang, L.S.; Hong, Z.; Wu, W.; Xiong, S.; Zhong, M.; Gao, X.; Rehman, J.; Malik, A.B. mtDNA Activates cGAS Signaling and Suppresses the YAP-Mediated Endothelial Cell Proliferation Program to Promote Inflammatory Injury. Immunity 2020, 52, 475–486.e475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lv, Y.; Kim, K.; Sheng, Y.; Cho, J.; Qian, Z.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Hu, G.; Pan, D.; Malik, A.B.; Hu, G. YAP Controls Endothelial Activation and Vascular Inflammation Through TRAF6. Circ. Res. 2018, 123, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. He, J.; Bao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Lv, H.; Liu, Y.; Yao, L.; Li, B.; Zhang, C.; He, S.; et al. Yes-Associated Protein Promotes Angiogenesis via Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 in Endothelial Cells. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ratajczak, M.Z.; Adamiak, M.; Thapa, A.; Bujko, K.; Brzezniakiewicz-Janus, K.; Lenkiewicz, A.M. NLRP3 inflammasome couples purinergic signaling with activation of the complement cascade for the optimal release of cells from bone marrow. Leukemia 2019, 33, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cicko, S.; Köhler, T.C.; Ayata, C.K.; Müller, T.; Ehrat, N.; Meyer, A.; Hossfeld, M.; Zech, A.; Di Virgilio, F.; Idzko, M. Extracellular ATP is a danger signal activating P2X7 receptor in a LPS mediated inflammation (ARDS/ALI). Oncotarget 2018, 9, 30635–30648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gaudet, A.D.; Popovich, P.G. Extracellular matrix regulation of inflammation in the healthy and injured spinal cord. Exp. Neurol. 2014, 258, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Shaharudin, A.; Aziz, Z. Effectiveness of hyaluronic acid and its derivatives on chronic wounds: A systematic review. J. Wound Care 2016, 25, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Xu, T.; Bianco, P.; Fisher, L.W.; Longenecker, G.; Smith, E.; Goldstein, S.; Bonadio, J.; Boskey, A.; Heegaard, A.M.; Sommer, B.; et al. Targeted disruption of the biglycan gene leads to an osteoporosis-like phenotype in mice. Nat. Genet. 1998, 20, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Roedig, H.; Nastase, M.V.; Wygrecka, M.; Schaefer, L. Breaking down chronic inflammatory diseases: The role of biglycan in promoting a switch between inflammation and autophagy. FEBS J. 2019, 286, 2965–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Tighe, R.M.; Garantziotis, S. Hyaluronan interactions with innate immunity in lung biology. Matrix Biol. J. Int. Soc. Matrix Biol. 2019, 78–79, 84–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jiang, D.; Liang, J.; Fan, J.; Yu, S.; Chen, S.; Luo, Y.; Prestwich, G.D.; Mascarenhas, M.M.; Garg, H.G.; Quinn, D.A.; et al. Regulation of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 1173–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Xu, C.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, H. High molecular weight hyaluronan attenuates fine particulate matter-induced acute lung injury through inhibition of ROS-ASK1-p38/JNK-mediated epithelial apoptosis. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 59, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Koslowski, R.; Pfeil, U.; Fehrenbach, H.; Kasper, M.; Skutelsky, E.; Wenzel, K.W. Changes in xylosyltransferase activity and in proteoglycan deposition in bleomycin-induced lung injury in rat. Eur. Respir. J. 2001, 18, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Babelova, A.; Moreth, K.; Tsalastra-Greul, W.; Zeng-Brouwers, J.; Eickelberg, O.; Young, M.F.; Bruckner, P.; Pfeilschifter, J.; Schaefer, R.M.; Gröne, H.J.; et al. Biglycan, a danger signal that activates the NLRP3 inflammasome via toll-like and P2X receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 24035–24048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Roedig, H.; Nastase, M.V.; Frey, H.; Moreth, K.; Zeng-Brouwers, J.; Poluzzi, C.; Hsieh, L.T.; Brandts, C.; Fulda, S.; Wygrecka, M.; et al. Biglycan is a new high-affinity ligand for CD14 in macrophages. Matrix Biol. J. Int. Soc. Matrix Biol. 2019, 77, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Poluzzi, C.; Nastase, M.V.; Zeng-Brouwers, J.; Roedig, H.; Hsieh, L.T.; Michaelis, J.B.; Buhl, E.M.; Rezende, F.; Manavski, Y.; Bleich, A.; et al. Biglycan evokes autophagy in macrophages via a novel CD44/Toll-like receptor 4 signaling axis in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2019, 95, 540–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.