Next Article in Journal
RAGE–TLR4 Crosstalk Is the Key Mechanism by Which High Glucose Enhances the Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Response in Primary Bovine Alveolar Macrophages
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of Novel Candidate Genes for Familial Thyroid Cancer by Whole Exome Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
Deciphering the Prognostic and Therapeutic Significance of Cell Cycle Regulator CENPF: A Potential Biomarker of Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment for Patients with Liposarcoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Dysregulation of the Mycobiome and Archaeome and Distinct Oncogenic Characteristics according to Subtype and Gender in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Prostaglandin F2α Regulates Adipogenesis by Modulating Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Signaling in Graves’ Ophthalmopathy

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7012; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087012
by Ru Zhu †, Xing-Hua Wang †, Bo-Wen Wang, Xuan Ouyang, Ya-Yan You, Hua-Tao Xie, Ming-Chang Zhang * and Fa-Gang Jiang *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7012; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087012
Submission received: 27 February 2023 / Revised: 24 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 April 2023 / Published: 10 April 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

ijms-2280401

Prostaglandin F2α Regulates Adipogenesis by Modulating Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Signaling in Graves' Ophthalmopathy

 

1.    It is noted that your manuscript still needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to sentence structure and grammar errors so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.

2.    The first occurrence of the abbreviation needs to be indicated in full.

3.    Line 46-47, phosphatidylinositol-3-ki-nase (P13K) should be PI3K.

4.    Page 2 Line 55 Suggest supplementing further additions to the mechanism of action of PGAs drugs on fat atrophy for in connection with Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO).

5.    Legend of figure 1A, description like “brown cells indicating a positive result “should be noted, and the brown cells need to be pointed out by arrow in the figure.

6.    In Figure 2D-E, the axis coordinates and scales are not readable.

7.    What does AM mean in figures? 

8.    There is no description of the P value in the text and the note in the legend.

9.    The magnification in all the figures should be written in a consistent format or use the scale bar.

10.The method part does not explain how the quantification was performed after Oil Red O staining, according to the reference the vertical axis in the figure should be “absorbance unit”.

11.line136, “5 mM of U0126”, units not consistent with those in fig 2C.

12.Method part, how are the adipose cells obtained? Taken from orbital decompression at the time of surgery? Excision or biopsy needle? Site of acquisition? Both eyes or one eye?

13.Table 1, is there any difference between the first patient and others? Table 1 should be presented in a three-line table.

14.4.2 and 4.3 should be re-organized, some duplication. 4.3 there is a format error.

15.All kits used in the experiment should indicate the manufacturer and origin.

16.4.7 and 4.8 headings are formatted inconsistently with the previous.

17.Because the study lacks animal models and the sample size is too small, please mention in the limitation.

 

Comments: accept after modifying.

 

Author Response

RESPONSES TO REVIEWERS

We would like to express our sincere thanks to editors and reviewers for their critical and constructive comments. We have tried our best to improve the manuscript to address their concerns. We respond point-by-point to each of their comments and criticisms. We feel that their comments have helped us on significantly improving and strengthening the manuscript and clarifying some issues. We hope that the revision has addressed their concerns. All modified parts in revised manuscript are marked with red fonts. For the point-by-point response, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The topic is relevant and article is well structured. The methods that were used are correctly chosen. My advice would be to apply more detailed statistical analysis. However, current data processing methods are sufficient. Authors mostly uses recent publications (within the last 5 years) and relevant. 

Author Response

RESPONSES TO REVIEWERS

We would like to express our sincere thanks to editors and reviewers for their critical and constructive comments. We have tried our best to improve the manuscript to address their concerns. We respond point-by-point to each of their comments and criticisms. We feel that their comments have helped us on significantly improving and strengthening the manuscript and clarifying some issues. We hope that the revision has addressed their concerns. All modified parts in revised manuscript are marked with red fonts. For the point-by-point response, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop