Next Article in Journal
Diet-Induced Obesity Induces Transcriptomic Changes in Neuroimmunometabolic-Related Genes in the Striatum and Olfactory Bulb
Previous Article in Journal
Characterizing the Mutational Landscape of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in a Prospective Cohort of Mexican Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Different Prostatic Tissue Microbiomes between High- and Low-Grade Prostate Cancer Pathogenesis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Apoptosis–Cell Cycle–Autophagy Molecular Mechanisms Network in Heterogeneous Aggressive Phenotype Prostate Hyperplasia Primary Cell Cultures Have a Prognostic Role

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9329; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179329
by Elena Matei 1,†, Manuela Enciu 2,3,*, Mihai Cătălin Roșu 1,†, Felix Voinea 3,4, Anca Florentina Mitroi 1,2, Mariana Deacu 2,3, Gabriela Isabela Băltățescu 1,2, Antonela-Anca Nicolau 1,2, Anca Chisoi 1, Mariana Aşchie 2,3 and Anita Cristina Ionescu (Mitu) 3,5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9329; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179329
Submission received: 23 July 2024 / Revised: 26 August 2024 / Accepted: 26 August 2024 / Published: 28 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cutting Edge Advances in Prostate Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This study was done and conducted solely by flow cytometry, and it is difficult and not sufficient to explain multiple biological characteristics. Authors are advised to perform additional experiments to support the results. For instance, L124-126, “cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase being characterized by aneuploidy status”. The aneuploidy status requires further evidence to prove.

The results of Fig.2 lack of descriptive explanation.

How would authors explain the BPH cell culture S5 showed a significantly high percentage both at the S phase and G2/M phase?

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Some typing mistakes and words are incorrectly chosen in the manuscript, such as intern control, reported to control.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1,

Please see the attachment.

Best regards,

PhD Biologist, Researcher III, Matei Elena

CEDMOG, Ovidius University from Constanta, Romania

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In this manuscript, the authors investigated cell death, DNA content, and autophagy molecular mechanisms network as predictor biomarkers to highlight prostate pathogenesis and its prognostic role. This study is based on flow cytometric analysis.

The authors observed that higher late apoptosis expression, high proliferative S phase of cell cycle category, and aneuploidy status represent unfavorable prognostic biomarkers and dependent predictor factors in heterogeneous aggressive phenotype BHP cell cultures.

Overall, this study is potentially of interest. However, as the results are only based on flow cytometric analysis, different methodology approaches (including WB and IHC) are required to confirm the results and support the conclusions.

Specific comments:

Figure 2 shows nodular hyperplasia, atrophya, and chronic inflammation in primary prostate cell cultures developed from tissue pieces recovered from patients with hyperplasia (BPH). The images are not convincing. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is required using specific markers to study inflammatory cells in the TME.    

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language is required.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2,

Please see the attachment.

Best regards,

PhD Biologist, Researcher III, Matei Elena

CEDMOG, Ovidius University from Constanta, Romania

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript has been revised. No further comments.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Some typing mistakes in text.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1,

Please see the attachment.

Best regards,

PhD Biologist, Researcher III, Matei Elena

CEDMOG, Ovidius University from Constanta, Romania

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Although the authors partially addressed the raised questions, the new version is sufficiently improved.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2,

Please see the attachment.

Best regards,

PhD Biologist, Researcher III, Matei Elena

CEDMOG, Ovidius University from Constanta, Romania

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop