Next Article in Journal
Mitochondria and Acute Leukemia: A Clinician’s Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Roles of Histone H2B, H3 and H4 Variants in Cancer Development and Prognosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Statins on Markers of Breast Cancer Proliferation and Apoptosis in Women with In Situ or Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Cell Death: Mechanisms and Potential Targets in Breast Cancer Therapy

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9703; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179703
by Jiangying Qian †, Linna Zhao †, Ling Xu, Jin Zhao, Yongxu Tang, Min Yu, Jie Lin, Lei Ding * and Qinghua Cui *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9703; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179703
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 31 August 2024 / Accepted: 5 September 2024 / Published: 7 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Therapies of Breast Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The review paper provides insight into multiple programmed cell death, specifically in breast cancer cells, which are possibly employed in treating this type of cancer. Together with the use of traditional treatment including chemotherapy and radiation, supplements with adjuvant drugs targeting molecules involved in PCDs could further treat or inhibit the growth of breast cancer.

The idea is not so new, another better paper did write about PCDs and how targeting molecules in pathways of PCDs could either improve treatment sensitivity or inhibit cancer growth: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-022-01110-y. The significance of this paper is it more focuses on breast cancer and includes more PCDs but in less detail.

This review needs a significant revision before publishing. The qualities are significantly different across parts, maybe because more than one person drafted this paper and a throughout review was not there to keep the quality consistent.

The following revisions are suggested:

Line

Comment

50

What is the reason for the classification of Group A and Group B?

69

KFERQ motif helps lysosomes to recognize and degrade proteins selectively

70

in the reference you cite, target proteins are transported to the lysosomes by HSC70 and are recognized and internalized by LAMP2A

74

What does it mean by “break them down into cells to provide energy”

79

not only these four, but there are also ER-phagy, Lysophagy, Lipophagy...

86

The sentence is awkwardly positioned, can just remove it, and what is full term of ATG?

99

A poorly written sentences, makes it sound like autophagy receptors are encapsulated and degraded

119

How do side effects and drug resistance relate to autophagy? The sentence is awkwardly positioned

137

Another redundant and poorly positioned sentence.

149 166

More like the change in miRNAs and lncRNAs expressions due to breast cancer affects autophagy than autophagy affecting BC

181

the study cited here only says "inhibit the malignant progression of BC" not reverse.

201

Reference

217

BID not Bid

231

not in NK cells. The way the author writes here sounds like extrinsic apoptosis only happens in NK cells. Besides NK cells, there is CD8-positive Cytotoxic T lymphocytes could also trigger extrinsic apoptosis

286

English check

321

PCD’s full term was already stated in the prior part.

330

Nod-like receptors (NLRs) instead of NLRs (Nod-like receptors)

400

Doxorubicin has been introduced in the past and now has a short-term

425

A paragraph should have an overall sentence, and other sentences support that specific sentence. none of author sentences in this paragraph relate to others. Sentence line 425 is completely opposite and unrelated to others. Not only this paragraph, but most paragraphs in this paper also have similar problems, nonstructural, fragile, and containing unrelated sentences.

423

Awkward short sentence without reference

422

Which effects are similar to GSDMB? GSDMB as you write have both negative and positive effects to BC GSDMB-2 promotes tumor invasion GSDMB-3 and 4 induce pyroptosis, help slowing down BC other GSDMB isoforms inhibit pyroptosis???

445

Please be consistent in using full term and short term (BC) of Breast cancer

487 490

No reference

498

You mean PUFA-PL-OOH?

515 516

These fundamental pieces information about ROS should have been mentioned earlier

513

doesn't GPX4 inhibit Ferroptosis?

520

Many pathways are not mentioned in the paper like iPLA2beta, fatty acid metabolism, DFO/DFOM/BP/CPX, Fe(III) transport, Fenton reaction...

525

What is the other side of impact of TIN?

531

What do you mean writing “promote the sensitivity of immunosuppressive TINs to ferroptosis”

543

It is Luminal androgen receptor (LAR)

556

how different? all PCDs have different mechanisms. Isn't it similar to ferroptosis as they are both involved in the accumulation of metal ions inside the cell?

558

it is lipoacylated or lipoylated?

667

please suggest molecule targets for inducing ferroptosis and cuprotosis in BC cells as you did for autophagy, apoptosis, necroptosis and pyroptosis

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Mentioned above - inconsistent across parts

Author Response

The reply is submitted as attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Qian et al has submitted a manuscript entitled “Cell death: mechanisms and potential targets in breast cancer therapy” for consideration for publication. This review describes the different types of cell death and their role in breast cancer therapies. There have been many reviews in this area in the past couple of years and this review needs to be distinguish itself from others. The concept of PANoptosis is way to describe these different types of cell death in a new way. Unfortunately, this was not expanded beyond a description of the different types of cell death individually. List below are my concerns.

1.      There are many similarities between apoptosis, pyroptosis and necroptosis. This was not emphasized. The role of caspases and how they can cross over between the different cell death mechanism as an example. Another example is reactive oxygen species and how it regulates these types of cell death.

2.      Breast cancer therapies can induce different types of cell death. It would be helpful to describe how some breast cancer cells induce one type of cell death and other cells can induce another. The heterogeneity of cell death needs to be explored in more detail.

3.      Genetic mutations and deletions were not discussed in enough detail. How does mutations in the PI3K/PTEN pathway affect cell death regulation? Beclin-1 haploinsufficiency was not mentioned.

4.      Metal induced cell death is a great description of new types of cell death but again how does this overlap with other forms of cell death. For example ferroptosis could influence autophagy or apoptosis. The regulation of ROS is really important in these forms of cell death. How about heterogeneity of cell death following treatments that induce metal induced cell death.

5.      Is their anything unique about breast cancer and how these cell death types are regulated? How about EGFR signaling or ER mutations?

6.      How does drug resistance impact these types of cell death?

7.      How will combination therapies improve breast cancer treatments without increasing normal tissue toxicity?

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English is fine.

Author Response

The reply is submitted as attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

No comments.

Back to TopTop