Next Article in Journal
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Oxaliplatin Plus Raltitrexed as an Alternative Option in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Failure of, or Unsuitability for, Transarterial Chemoembolization
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of a 24-Week Exercise Program on Functional Fitness, Oxidative Stress, and Salivary Cortisol Levels in Elderly Subjects
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 58
Issue 10
10.3390/medicina58101342
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

External Apical Root Resorption in Orthodontic Patients Who Practice Combat Sports: A Case-Control Observational Pilot Study

by
Alfonso Enrique Acevedo-Mascarúa
1,
Rafael Torres-Rosas
2,*,
Yobana Pérez-Cervera
2,
Daniel Pérez-Cruz
1,
Lizbeth Zulema Ku-Valenzuela
1,
Ana Lilia Gijón-Soriano
1 and
Liliana Argueta-Figueroa
3,*
1
División de Posgrado, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma “Benito Juárez” de Oaxaca, Av. Universidad S/N, Ex-Hacienda 5 Señores, Oaxaca de Juárez 68120, Mexico
2
Laboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Estudios en Ciencias de la Salud y la Enfermedad, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma “Benito Juárez” de Oaxaca, Av. Universidad S/N, Ex-Hacienda 5 Señores, Oaxaca de Juárez 68120, Mexico
3
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma “Benito Juárez” de Oaxaca, Av. Universidad S/N, Ex-Hacienda 5 Señores, Oaxaca de Juárez 68120, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101342
Submission received: 5 September 2022 / Revised: 21 September 2022 / Accepted: 22 September 2022 / Published: 24 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry and Oral Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Orthodontic treatment could lead to undesirable effects such as external apical root resorption (EARR). Moreover, trauma to both the face and teeth can predispose to EARR. On the other hand, the practice of combat sports results in increased maxillofacial injuries. Consequently, our objective was to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the EARR of the patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment who practice combat sports and controls. Our null hypothesis was that there is no difference in the EARR between patients undergoing orthodontic treatment who practice combat sports and the patients under the same treatment that do not practice combat sports. An observational, descriptive, and prospective case-control pilot study was designed. The exposed group consisted of patients that practice combat sports. Whereas the control group was conformed of patients that do not practice combat sports without a previous history of facial trauma and without face trauma during the orthodontic treatment. EARR of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth was measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The CBCT scans were obtained from all patients prior to the beginning of the orthodontic treatment and 1 year later. At the end of the follow-up for the maxillary right central and lateral incisors of the exposed group, the EARR was significantly higher than the homologous teeth of the control group (p < 0.05). As a consequence, the patients treated orthodontically who practice combat sports could be more susceptible to EARR.

1. Introduction

Orthodontic treatment could lead to undesirable effects, such as root resorption, tooth loss, dental fractures, demineralization, enamel wear, root resorption, early closure of the apex, bone resorption, traumatized soft tissues, temporomandibular dysfunction, and condylar resorption [1]. External apical root resorption (EARR) commonly concerns orthodontists because it diminishes root length and volume, alters the center of resistance, and compromises support and anchorage [2].
EARR is a complication that occurs as a consequence of orthodontic treatment. However, the risk factors for EARR have not been completely clarified [3,4,5]. Some of the risk factors suggested related to orthodontic treatment are inadequate biomechanics, the prolonged duration of treatment, the intensity of the forces, as well as range and type of the movements [6,7,8,9]. On the other hand, the risk factors suggested related to the patients are age, personal habits, periodontal disease, occlusal relationship, dental size and morphology, periapical infection, and dental trauma [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, several publications in dentistry have divergent results despite presenting similar characteristics or measuring different outcomes to determine the effect of treatment [20,21], and the systematic reviews of the EARR in orthodontic patients reported risk of bias and low to moderate quality in the included studies [22,23,24].
The frequency of dental traumatism In patients attending dentistry consultation is high, with a prevalence of 15.2% on permanent dentition and 22.7% on primary dentition [25]. Those traumatisms are related mainly to falls (up to 64%), followed by sports practice (up to 40.4%) and car accidents (up to 7.8%) [26]. Nevertheless, the severe trauma of the supporting tissue and teeth can predispose to EARR in patients without orthodontic treatment [27].
Most traumatic dental injuries in primary and permanent dentitions involve the anterior maxillary teeth, especially the central and lateral incisors. Traumatic dental injuries usually affect a single tooth, but sports practice may result in multiple teeth injuries [28]. Nevertheless, practicing combat sports results in an increase in both face and tooth injuries [29]. The risk for dental traumatism related to sports practice is classified into two categories. The high-risk sports include inline-skating, skate-boarding, martial sports, lacrosse, rugby, American football, ice hockey, mountain biking, and skating; and medium-risk sports, which include basketball, team handball, squash, gymnastics, water polo, and soccer [30]. Based on this background, the current study aimed to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the EARR of the patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment who practice combat sports and controls. Then, our null hypothesis was that there is no difference in the EARR between patients undergoing orthodontic treatment who practice combat sports and the patients under the same treatment that do not practice combat sports.

2. Materials and Methods

This research was conducted at the Orthodontics Department of the Postgraduate’s Clinic of Dentistry at the “Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca”. The type of design was an observational, descriptive, and prospective case-control study. Ethical approval (ref. no: 19POC001FO) was obtained from the local Human Research Ethics Committee (Comité de ética en investigación de la Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma “Benito Juárez” de Oaxaca). The inclusion criteria were patients with molar class I (without severe crowding) under fixed orthodontic treatment with the Edge-Wise technique (January to December 2019), aged between 18 and 25 years old, without gender restrictions. The exclusion criteria were female patients under contraceptive treatment, patients with parafunctional habits, endodontic treatment, the presence of restoration at the incisal edge, previous or incomplete orthodontic treatment, as well as systemic, degenerative, and metabolic disorders or genetic syndromes.
Exposed group: Patients that practice combat sports (boxing or martial arts).
Control group: Patients that do not practice combat sports without a previous history of facial trauma or patients without facial trauma during the orthodontic treatment.
The participants of the Exposed group were selected in sequence as they came for initial orthodontic consultation if they met the inclusion criteria. On the other hand, the participants of the Control group were selected randomly from the total patients that met the inclusion criteria.
The sample size was calculated using statistical power analysis [31], which, in a hypothesis test, is the probability that the test will detect an effect that actually exists, considering that 1.0 mm of EARR is clinically meaningful [32]. The minimum sample size calculated was 28 participants assuming power = 80%, alpha = 0.05, a standard deviation = unknowing, and mean difference = 1.0. However, the present research is only a pilot study, and due to that, the sample calculation was determined as proposed by Whitehead et al. [33] following the non-central t-distribution approach resulting in a sample size of 7 participants per group.
The evaluation of EARR was established through the measurements of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The CBCT scans were obtained from all of the patients prior to the beginning of the orthodontic treatment (T1) and 1 year later (T2). The scans were carried out in the same imaging center (“Imagen Dentofacial Digital”) using Promax® 3D Mid (PlanMeca, U.S.A). The scan parameters were a pixel size 127 um, active surface 15 × 15 cm, 90 kVp, and 5.2 mA. The CBCT scans were assessed by the same researcher (DP-C) to determine the EARR using the Planmeca Romexis Viewer Software (Romexis® 5.2.1.R). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to perform the intra-rater test with repeated measures of the teeth studied. The ICC was performed using the Irr package of the R software (R Development Core Team, 2011. Version 4.2.0).
Sagittal cuts of the teeth in a projection with a mediolateral orientation (at the longest vestibulopalatine width at the cementoenamel junction) were selected. We measured the distance from the dentin–enamel junction at the level of the incisal edge to the root apex. The EARR was calculated by assessing the difference in the tooth length between T1 and T2 (T1–T2) in millimeters, as shown in Figure 1. Both the researcher who performed the measurements and the one who analyzed the data were blinded, unaware of the study groups.
The normal distribution and variances of the data were tested using the Shapiro–Wilks test and the Bartlett or Levene tests, respectively. The results were expressed as the mean and standard deviation of the difference between the T1 and T2 measurements for both groups. A nonpaired t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, or Yuen t-Test was performed according to the distribution and variances of the data [34]. The analysis and graphs were performed using dplyr, nortest, ggstatsplot, and WRS2 packages of the R software (R Development Core Team, 2011. Version 4.2.0) and JASP (JASP Team, 2022. Version 0.16.3) software.

3. Results

Patients

Five hundred and ninety patients were treated at the Orthodontics Department of the Postgraduate Clinic of Dentistry from January to December 2019. The sample consisted of 14 patients that met inclusion criteria: seven patients that practiced combat sports and seven patients with the same age range and diagnosis as controls. The mean age of the participants was 22 ± 2 years for the study group and 20 ± 0.97 years for the control group (p > 0.05).
The ICC results had good reliability (0.87). Meanwhile, according to the Shapiro–Wilks and Levene test results, the data did not follow a normal distribution but showed equal variances. The EARR (mean ± standard deviation) and statistical analysis are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
The EARR of the maxillary teeth was statistically significant higher in the exposed group (Control = 1.251 ± 1.10; Exposed = 2.171 ± 1.82; p < 0.05). However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant in the mandibular teeth (Control = 1.93 ± 1.65; Exposed = 2.25 ± 3.12; p > 0.05; Table 1 and Figure 2).
The EARR in the right maxillary central and lateral incisors (0.84 ± 0.74; 0.54 ± 0.35, respectively) of the exposed group was significantly higher than in homologous teeth of the control group (p < 0.05). However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant in the rest of de evaluated teeth (p > 0.05; Table 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).

4. Discussion

EARR is common in patients treated orthodontically; however, there is no specific test to evaluate the prognosis for the patients at risk for EARR. Currently, the follow-up for early diagnosis of EARR includes screening for a history of trauma [35]. Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, there is insufficient evidence that supports the relationship between EARR in patients treated with fixed orthodontics and the antecedents of dental trauma [22].
In this study, the EARR in the maxillary teeth was statistically significantly higher in the exposed group, which agrees with Brin et al. [36], who evaluated the EARR of traumatized permanent maxillary incisors related to orthodontic treatment with a 6-month follow-up after completion of the retention period. Their results suggest that combining dental trauma with orthodontic treatment causes the maxillary teeth to be more susceptible to root resorption.
Dental trauma may increase the risk of EARR in patients treated orthodontically, which is exemplified by the fact that at the moment of impact, a considerable amount of energy is expended in driving the tooth into its dental alveolus. These traumatic forces may compress the periodontal ligament and damage the alveolar wall, diving into the loss of tissue [37]. In addition, mechanical forces promote osteoclast differentiation and activity that induces dental root resorptions [38,39].
In this study, the EARR in the right maxillary central and lateral incisors was statistically significantly higher in the exposed group. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant in the rest of the evaluated teeth, which may be explained by the fact that despite the combat sports practiced, there was a high risk of dental traumatism. In this study, there was not enough information about the intensity, location, and type of trauma to the face and teeth during the practice. Furthermore, the sample was too small. Future research should correlate the classification and severity of trauma to the face and teeth with the EARR in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
Hevoca et al. [40] investigated pre-injury factors, the causes of dental injuries, and healing complications after traumatic injuries to permanent teeth. The research team reported a prevalence of EARR on intruded teeth (33.3%), luxated teeth (11.6%) avulsed, and replanted teeth (26.5%). However, teeth with isolated crown fractures did not present EARR. On the other hand, in teeth with root fractures, EARR was founded in 36.7%. These findings suggest that the presence of EARR may be related to the damage to both dental alveolus and root tissues. Unfortunately, there exist more than 50 traumatic dental injury classification systems. Most of them are related to treatment methods and the later complications of dental injuries [41]. Moreover, there is a lack of evidence of the EARR as a complication of facial trauma, which correlates with our findings that the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant in most evaluated teeth.
On the other hand, in this study, it was found that the distribution of the EARR data did not follow a normal distribution, which coincides with the results of other studies in which the EARR was evaluated, taking into account other variables such as the type of orthodontic technique (self-ligated vs. conventional) [42,43] or teeth vitality (teeth with or without previous endodontic treatment) [44,45]. Due to this type of distribution, the data must be analyzed cautiously, using the appropriate statistical test, as well as not drawing rushed conclusions. In general, the fact that there are statistically significant differences between the means of two groups does not necessarily imply that there is clinical significance.
The strengths of this pilot study lie in the variables that were homogenized to avoid bias, such as the fixed orthodontic system used, the orthodontic technique, the CBTC device, the conditions for taking the CBTC, the time between each EARR measurement, the age range of participants, and exposure. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies with an adequate design that support that a greater degree of EARR is produced in patients with fixed orthodontics with trauma since, until now, most of the evidence is empirical, anecdotal, and comes from case reports. On the other hand, the limitations of this study are that the characteristics of the facial trauma (number, location, type, and intensity of trauma) of the exposed group during the orthodontic treatment were not collected. Furthermore, the type of combat sport (boxing, karate, kickboxing, judo, taekwondo) may influence the probability, localization, and intensity of trauma [46,47]. Consequently, the type of combat sport may relate to the severity of EARR and the affected teeth. Nevertheless, the results in patients who practice combat sports may not be extrapolated to dental trauma by car accidents, falls, and violence. Moreover, other EARR miscellaneous factors should be addressed, such as oral habits and biological factors.
Despite the fact that this is a pilot study, another limitation is that small samples can overestimate the size of the effect due to the random error attributable to an insufficient sample, where the results could be scattered around the real effect [48,49]. Further research should be randomized clinical trials with an adequate sample size, confining the type of combat sport, examining the facial trauma characteristics, and evaluating the mechanical and biological factors of EARR.

5. Conclusions

The maxillary right central and lateral incisors of combat sports patients exhibited statistically significantly higher resorption than controls. However, the clinical relevance is unclear. This susceptibility could be related to the severity of the dental trauma. More studies with large samples are required to generate solid conclusions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.T.-R. and L.A.-F.; methodology, L.A.-F. and Y.P.-C.; formal analysis, L.A.-F.; investigation, A.E.A.-M. and L.Z.K.-V.; data curation D.P.-C., L.Z.K.-V. and A.E.A.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.T.-R. and L.A.-F.; writing—review and editing, R.T.-R. and L.A.-F.; supervision, A.L.G.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Official Mexican Norm for Medical Research (“NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-012-SSA3-2012”) [50]. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of “Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca” (Reference number 19POC001FO).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

LA-F thanks the Investigadoras e Investigadores por México CONACYT program, and Posgrade Division and Dentistry School, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, for their support. RT-R, and YPC thanks Cuerpo académico “Investigación en Salud” UABJO-CA-63. All authors express special thanks Raul Javier, Arnaud-Carreño and the Imagen Dentofacial Digital´s team for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Westley, H. Risks and complications in orthodontic treatment. Dent. Nurs. 2010, 6, 318–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Linkous, E.R.; Trojan, T.M.; Harris, E.F. External apical root resorption and vectors of orthodontic tooth movement. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2020, 158, 700–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mirabella, A.D.; Årtun, J. Risk factors for apical root resorption of maxillary anterior teeth in adult orthodontic patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1995, 108, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bayir, F.; Gumus, E.B. External apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment: Incidence, severity and risk factors. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospect. 2021, 15, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fernandes, L.Q.P.; Figueiredo, N.C.; Antonucci, C.C.M.; Lages, E.M.B.; Andrade, I., Jr.; Capelli, J., Jr. Predisposing factors for external apical root resorption associated with orthodontic treatment. Korean J. Orthod. 2019, 49, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nogueira, A.V.B.; De Molon, R.S.; Nokhbehsaim, M.; Deschner, J.; Cirelli, J.A. Contribution of biomechanical forces to inflammation-induced bone resorption. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mota-Rodríguez, A.-N.; Olmedo-Hernández, O.; Argueta-Figueroa, L. A systematic analysis of evidence for surgically accelerated orthodontics. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2019, 11, e829–e838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Asano, M.; Yamaguchi, M.; Nakajima, R.; Fujita, S.; Utsunomiya, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Kasai, K. IL-8 and MCP-1 induced by excessive orthodontic force mediates odontoclastogenesis in periodontal tissues. Oral Dis. 2010, 17, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feller, L.; Khammissa, R.A.G.; Thomadakis, G.; Fourie, J.; Lemmer, J. Apical External Root Resorption and Repair in Orthodontic Tooth Movement: Biological Events. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bender, I.B.; Byers, M.R.; Mori, K. Periapical replacement resorption of permanent, vital, endodontically treated incisors after orthodontic movement: Report of two cases. J. Endod. 1997, 23, 768–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jung, Y.-H.; Cho, B.-H. External root resorption after orthodontic treatment: A study of contributing factors. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2011, 41, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kindelan, S.A.; Day, P.F.; Kindelan, J.D.; Spencer, J.R.; Duggal, M.S. Dental trauma: An overview of its influence on the management of orthodontic treatment. Part 1. J. Orthod. 2008, 35, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Preoteasa, C.T.; Ionescu, E.; Preoteasa, E.; Comes, C.A.; Buzea, M.C.; Grămescu, A. Orthodontically induced root resorption correlated with morphological characteristics. Romanian J. Morphol. Embryol. 2009, 50, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  14. van Gastel, J.; Quirynen, M.; Teughels, W.; Carels, C. The relationships between malocclusion, fixed orthodontic appliances and periodontal disease. A review of the literature. Aust. Orthod. J. 2007, 23, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Mohlin, B.; Axelsson, S.; Paulin, G.; Pietilä, T.; Bondemark, L.; Brattström, V.; Hansen, K.; Holm, A.-K. TMD in Relation to Malocclusion and Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Angle Orthod. 2007, 77, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. d’Apuzzo, F.; Nucci, L.; Delfino, I.; Portaccio, M.; Minervini, G.; Isola, G.; Serino, I.; Camerlingo, C.; Lepore, M. Application of Vibrational Spectroscopies in the Qualitative Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Periodontal Ligament during Orthodontic Tooth Movement. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cardaropoli, D.; Gaveglio, L. The Influence of Orthodontic Movement on Periodontal Tissues Level. Semin. Orthod. 2007, 13, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elkordy, S.A.; Palomo, L.; Palomo, J.M.; Mostafa, Y.A. Do fixed orthodontic appliances adversely affect the periodontium? A systematic review of systematic reviews. Semin. Orthod. 2019, 25, 130–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alzamora, T.S. Factores de riesgo que predisponen a la reabsorción radicular durante el tratamiento ortodóncico. Rev. Esp. Ortod. 2000, 30, 351–363. [Google Scholar]
  20. Castro-Gutiérrez, M.E.M.; Argueta-Figueroa, L.; Fuentes-Mascorro, G.; Moreno-Rodríguez, A.; Torres-Rosas, R. Novel Approaches for the Treatment of Necrotic Immature Teeth Using Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ávila-Curiel, B.X.; Gómez-Aguirre, J.N.; Gijón-Soriano, A.L.; Acevedo-Mascarúa, A.E.; Argueta-Figueroa, L.; Torres-Rosas, R. Intervenciones complementarias para el tratamiento de dolor en pacientes con alteraciones temporomandibulares: Una revisión sistemática. Rev. Int. Acupunt. 2020, 14, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Villaman-Santacruz, H.; Torres-Rosas, R.; Acevedo-Mascarua, A.; Argueta-Figueroa, L. Root resorption factors associated with orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent. Med. Probl. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ioannidou-Marathiotou, I.; Zafeiriadis, A.; Papadopoulos, M.A. Root resorption of endodontically treated teeth following orthodontic treatment: A meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig. 2012, 17, 1733–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yi, J.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, Z. Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2016, 16, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Petti, S.; Glendor, U.; Andersson, L. World traumatic dental injury prevalence and incidence, a meta-analysis-One billion living people have had traumatic dental injuries. Dent. Traumatol. 2018, 34, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zaleckiene, V.; Peciuliene, V.; Brukiene, V.; Drukteinis, S. Traumatic dental injuries: Etiology, prevalence and possible outcomes. Stomatologija 2014, 16, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  27. Soares, A.J.; Souza, G.A.; Pereira, A.C.; Vargas-Neto, J.; Zaia, A.A.; Silva, E.J.N.L. Frequency of root resorption following trauma to permanent teeth. J. Oral Sci. 2015, 57, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lam, R. Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic dental injuries: A review of the literature. Aust. Dent. J. 2016, 61, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Polmann, H.; Melo, G.; Réus, J.C.; Domingos, F.L.; de Souza, B.D.M.; Padilha, A.C.; Duque, T.M.; Porporatti, A.L.; Flores-Mir, C.; Canto, G.D.L. Prevalence of dentofacial injuries among combat sports practitioners: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent. Traumatol. 2020, 36, 124–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Uzel, I.; Aykut-Yetkiner, A.; Ersin, N.; Ertuğrul, F.; Oncag, O.; Attin, R. Dental Trauma and Mouthguard Usage among Soccer Players in Izmir, Turkey. Dent. J. 2014, 2, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schoenfeld, D.A. Statistical Considerations for a Parallel Trial where the Outcome is a Measurement MGH Biostatistics Center: Massachusetts General Hospital Mallinckrodt General Clinical Research Center. Available online: http://hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu/sample_size/js/js_parallel_quant.html (accessed on 31 January 2019).
  32. Mohandesan, H.; Ravanmehr, H.; Valaei, N. A radiographic analysis of external apical root resorption of maxillary incisors during active orthodontic treatment. Eur. J. Orthod. 2007, 29, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Whitehead, A.L.; Julious, S.A.; Cooper, C.L.; Campbell, M.J. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat. Methods Med Res. 2016, 25, 1057–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yuen, K.K. The Two-Sample Trimmed t for Unequal Population Variances. Biometrika 1974, 61, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nanekrungsan, K.; Patanaporn, V.; Janhom, A.; Korwanich, N. External apical root resorption in maxillary incisors in orthodontic patients: Associated factors and radiographic evaluation. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2012, 42, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Brin, I.; Ben-Bassat, Y.; Heling, I.; Engelberg, A. The influence of orthodontic treatment on previously traumatized permanent incisors. Eur. J. Orthod. 1991, 13, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Andreasen, J.O.; Andreasen, F.M. Root resorption following traumatic dental injuries. Proc. Finn. Dent. Soc. 1992, 88, 95–114. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Huang, H.-M.; Han, C.-S.; Cui, S.-J.; Zhou, Y.-K.; Xin, T.-Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhu, S.-B.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Yang, R.-L. Mechanical force-promoted osteoclastic differentiation via periodontal ligament stem cell exosomal protein ANXA3. Stem Cell Rep. 2022, 17, 1842–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Paddenberg, E.; Krenmayr, B.; Jantsch, J.; Kirschneck, C.; Proff, P.; Schröder, A. Dietary salt and myeloid NFAT5 (nuclear factor of activated T cells 5) impact on the number of bone-remodelling cells and frequency of root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement. Ann. Anat. Anat. Anz. 2022, 244, 151979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hecova, H.; Tzigkounakis, V.; Merglova, V.; Netolicky, J. A retrospective study of 889 injured permanent teeth. Dent. Traumatol. 2010, 26, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Petti, S.; Andreasen, J.O.; Glendor, U.; Andersson, L. NA0D—The new Traumatic Dental Injury classification of the World Health Organization. Dent. Traumatol. 2022, 38, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aras, I.; Unal, I.; Huniler, G.; Aras, A. Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2018, 79, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, W.; Haq, A.A.A.; Zhou, Y. Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: A longitudinal retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 2015, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Spurrier, S.W.; Hall, S.H.; Joondeph, D.R.; Shapiro, P.A.; Riedel, R.A. A comparison of apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment in endodontically treated and vital teeth. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1990, 97, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Castro, I.; Valladares-Neto, J.; Estrela, C. Contribution of cone beam computed tomography to the detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment in root-filled and vital teeth. Angle Orthod. 2014, 85, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ha, S.; Kim, M.J.; Jeong, H.S.; Lee, I.; Lee, S.Y. Mechanisms of Sports Concussion in Taekwondo: A Systematic Video Analysis of Seven Cases. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shirani, G.; Motamedi, M.H.K.; Ashuri, A.; Eshkevari, P.S. Prevalence and patterns of combat sport related maxillofacial injuries. J. Emergencies Trauma Shock 2010, 3, 314–317. [Google Scholar]
  48. Manzo-Toledo, A.; Torres-Rosas, R.; Mendieta-Zerón, H.; Arriaga-Pizano, L.; Argueta-Figueroa, L. Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J. Indones. 2021, 30, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Deeks, J.J.; Higgins, J.P.; Altman, D.G.; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 241–284. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gobernación, S.D. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-012-SSA3–2012, Que Establece los Criterios Para la Ejecución de Proyectos de Investigación Para la Salud en seres Humanos: Diario Oficial De La Federación 2012. Available online: https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5284148&fecha=04/01/2013#gsc.tab=0 (accessed on 15 December 2019).
Medicina 58 01342 g001 550
Figure 1. Sagittal cut of a tooth in a projection with a mediolateral orientation. The root length was measured by drawing a line from the incisal edge (at the dentin-enamel junction) to the apex, (A) tooth without EARR, (B) tooth with EARR.
Figure 1. Sagittal cut of a tooth in a projection with a mediolateral orientation. The root length was measured by drawing a line from the incisal edge (at the dentin-enamel junction) to the apex, (A) tooth without EARR, (B) tooth with EARR.
Medicina 58 01342 g001
Medicina 58 01342 g002 550
Figure 2. Raincloud plots of the EARR in maxillary anterior teeth. (A) Maxillary teeth and (B) Mandibular teeth. EARR expressed as mean difference between T1 and T2 measurements (mm) and SD.
Figure 2. Raincloud plots of the EARR in maxillary anterior teeth. (A) Maxillary teeth and (B) Mandibular teeth. EARR expressed as mean difference between T1 and T2 measurements (mm) and SD.
Medicina 58 01342 g002
Medicina 58 01342 g003 550
Figure 3. Raincloud plots of the EARR in maxillary anterior teeth. (A,B) central incisors, (C,D) lateral incisors, and (E,F) canines. EARR expressed as mean difference between T1 and T2 measurements (mm) and SD.
Figure 3. Raincloud plots of the EARR in maxillary anterior teeth. (A,B) central incisors, (C,D) lateral incisors, and (E,F) canines. EARR expressed as mean difference between T1 and T2 measurements (mm) and SD.
Medicina 58 01342 g003
Medicina 58 01342 g004 550
Figure 4. Raincloud plots of the EARR in mandibular anterior teeth. (A,B) central incisors, (C,D) lateral incisors, and (E,F) canines. EARR expressed as mean difference between T1 and T2 measurements (mm) and SD.
Figure 4. Raincloud plots of the EARR in mandibular anterior teeth. (A,B) central incisors, (C,D) lateral incisors, and (E,F) canines. EARR expressed as mean difference between T1 and T2 measurements (mm) and SD.
Medicina 58 01342 g004
Table
Table 1. Results of the comparison between the EARR of the exposed and control participants (Maxillary vs. Mandibular teeth).
Table 1. Results of the comparison between the EARR of the exposed and control participants (Maxillary vs. Mandibular teeth).
Maxillary teethMandibular teeth
ControlExposedControlExposed
Mean1.2512.1711.9392.258
SD1.1001.8271.6533.120
Minimum0.0000.1000.0200.010
Maximum4.9508.1007.40017.240
Wp
Maxillary teeth 589.0000.004 *
Mandibular teeth 938.5000.695
U de Mann-Whitney test. Standard deviation (SD). * Statistically significant difference.
Table
Table 2. Results of the comparison between the EARR of the exposed and control participants.
Table 2. Results of the comparison between the EARR of the exposed and control participants.
Teeth111213
Control (mean ± SD)0.84 ± 0.740.54 ± 0.352.20 ± 1.47
Exposed (mean ± SD)2.10 ± 0.631.61 ± 1.212.92 ± 3.22
p-value0.004 *0.026 *0.797
Teeth212223
Control (mean ± SD)1.09 ± 0.981.45 ± 1.281.36 ± 0.92
Exposed (mean ± SD)2.03 ± 1.402.11 ± 2.252.23 ± 1.55
p-value0.2590.7010.259
Teeth313233
Control (mean ± SD)1.18 ± 1.601.88 ± 1.193.21 ± 2.85
Exposed (mean ± SD)4.36 ± 6.092.54 ± 3.751.33 ± 1.59
p-value0.0970.3830.128
Teeth414243
Control (mean ± SD)1.76 ± 1.131.83 ± 0.691.75 ± 1.45
Exposed (mean ± SD)1.64 ± 1.221.98 ± 1.421.66 ± 1.40
p-value0.9020.9490.902
Mann–Whitney U test. Standard deviation (SD). * Statistically significant difference.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Acevedo-Mascarúa, A.E.; Torres-Rosas, R.; Pérez-Cervera, Y.; Pérez-Cruz, D.; Ku-Valenzuela, L.Z.; Gijón-Soriano, A.L.; Argueta-Figueroa, L. External Apical Root Resorption in Orthodontic Patients Who Practice Combat Sports: A Case-Control Observational Pilot Study. Medicina 2022, 58, 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101342

AMA Style

Acevedo-Mascarúa AE, Torres-Rosas R, Pérez-Cervera Y, Pérez-Cruz D, Ku-Valenzuela LZ, Gijón-Soriano AL, Argueta-Figueroa L. External Apical Root Resorption in Orthodontic Patients Who Practice Combat Sports: A Case-Control Observational Pilot Study. Medicina. 2022; 58(10):1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acevedo-Mascarúa, Alfonso Enrique, Rafael Torres-Rosas, Yobana Pérez-Cervera, Daniel Pérez-Cruz, Lizbeth Zulema Ku-Valenzuela, Ana Lilia Gijón-Soriano, and Liliana Argueta-Figueroa. 2022. "External Apical Root Resorption in Orthodontic Patients Who Practice Combat Sports: A Case-Control Observational Pilot Study" Medicina 58, no. 10: 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101342

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop