Next Article in Journal
Effects of Toxic Metal Contamination in the Tri-State Mining District on the Ecological Community and Human Health: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
SEEP-CI: A Structured Economic Evaluation Process for Complex Health System Interventions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 18
10.3390/ijerph17186781
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Water Intrusion on Pathogenic Vibrio Species to Inland Brackish Waters of China

by
Qingyao Wang
1,2,†,
Songzhe Fu
1,2,*,†,
Qian Yang
3,*,
Jingwei Hao
1,2,
Can Zhou
1,2 and
Ying Liu
1,2
1
College of Marine Technology and Environment, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
2
Key Laboratory of Environment Controlled Aquaculture (KLECA), Ministry of Education, Dalian 116023, China
3
Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(18), 6781; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186781
Submission received: 7 July 2020 / Revised: 11 September 2020 / Accepted: 13 September 2020 / Published: 17 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Disease Epidemiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The estuary is the ecological niche of pathogenic Vibrio spp. as it provides abundant organic and inorganic nutrients from seawater and rivers. However, little is known about the ecology of these Vibrio species in the inland brackish water area. In this study, their co-occurrence and relationships to key environmental constraints (salinity and temperature) in the Hun-Tai River of China were examined using the most probable number polymerase chain reaction (MPN-PCR) approach. We hereby report 2-year continuous surveillance based on six water indices of the Hun-Tai River. The results showed that seawater intrusion maximally reached inland as far as 26.5 km for the Hun-Tai River. Pathogenic Vibrio spp. were detected in 21.9% of the water samples. In particular, V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus were isolated in 10 (10.4%), 20 (20.8.5%), and 2 (2.08%) samples, respectively. All V. parahaemolyticus strains were tdh gene negative, 10% were positive for the trh gene. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) divided V. parahaemolyticus strains into 12 sequence types (STs) for the Hun-Tai River. Five STs were respectively present in various locations along the Hun-Tai River. The PCR assay for detecting six virulence genes and Vibrio seventh pandemic island I and II revealed three genotypes in 12 V. cholerae isolates. The results of our study showed that seawater intrusion and salinity have profound effects on the distribution of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in the inland river, suggesting a potential health risk associated with the waters of the Hun-Tai River used for irrigation and drinking.

1. Introduction

Vibrio spp. are a group of Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterial species that are a natural constituent of freshwater, estuarine, and marine environments [1]. Numerous studies show that the estuary is the ecological niche of Vibrio spp. as it provides abundant organic and inorganic nutrients both from seawater and rivers. The species of significant clinical importance include V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus [2]. V. cholerae is the causal agent of cholera, which is an acute life-threatening diarrheal disease occurring in many developing countries [3]. V. parahaemolyticus causes the symptoms of acute gastroenteritis, which is often associated with the consumption of raw or undercooked seafood [4]. V. vulnificus can cause wound infections and septicemia in immunocompromised individuals or individuals with liver disease [5].
From a One Health perspective, the inland movement of the salt–freshwater transition zone would potentially introduce pathogenic Vibrio spp. into inland water, resulting in community outbreaks. However, the majority of studies have focused on the distribution and prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in the estuary [6,7,8]. Few studies have investigated the dissemination of pathogenic Vibrio spp. from the estuary to the inland river [9]. Several molecular fingerprinting methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and Errterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) have been adopted to subtype the pathogenic Vibrio spp. [10,11]. However, the relatively low resolution of these techniques may result in an incomplete or even biased estimation of the genetic diversity of Vibrio spp. More importantly, the fingerprinting results cannot be shared globally due to the use of different sets of restriction enzymes. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), on the other hand, is an unambiguous procedure for characterizing isolates of bacterial species using the sequences of seven housekeeping genes, which can be shared and standardized globally [12]. The MLST scheme for Vibrio spp. has been recently established to identify the genotypes for Vibrio spp. [13]. This state-of-the-art technique represents a promising tool for providing a low-cost unified tool for typing pathogenic Vibrio spp., which would provide valuable information for understanding the distribution of the distinct genotype in rivers.
The Hun-Tai (HT) River, located in Liaoning Province, China, is the sole source of potable water for the majority of cities along the HT River (Figure 1). Consequently, pathogen surveillance along the river sites used for drinking is critical for public health as it is severely impacted by seawater intrusion. The estuary of the HT River was an important port in north China, which was the hotspot of V. cholerae historically. In 1946 alone, there were 11 cholera outbreaks in this region, with more than 2600 deaths [3]. In our previous study, we conducted a six-month pathogen surveillance of this region and isolated non-O1/O139 V. cholerae in three sites of the HT River, which was linked to a human infection case [14].
To assess the health risk downstream of the HT River, in this study, we selected six sites in the river to investigate the inland distribution of three pathogenic Vibrio spp. systematically. The correlations between the key environmental variables and three pathogenic Vibrio spp. were monitored to assess the impacts of pathogenic Vibrio spp. strains on the drinking water sources in the HT River.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection

The Hun-Tai River, located in northeast China, belongs to the Liaohe River system and consists of the Hun River (415 km in length) and the Taizi River (413 km in length) (Figure 1). The Hun-Tai River drains across Liaohe Plain, which is one of the most densely populated plain areas and is an essential heavy industry region in China. The first study area is the lowland part of the Liaohe Plain (Figure 1), which covered the central metropolitan area of Liaoning Province, including the cities of Shenyang, Anshan, Fushun, Benxi, Liaoyang, Qingyuan, and Xinbin and covered an area of approximately 52,000 km2. The water in this region is heavily used by municipal and agricultural activities, which has also been subject to significant contamination from heavy metals, organics, and a range of other pollutants [15].
Six sites were selected for study along the HT River, China. The selection of the sampling sites was based on the distinct distribution of the salinity. The sites are situated from the estuary to the inland place with a distance of 95 km to the seashore, including estuary (HT-P1), Dukou (HT-P2), Shuiyuan (HT-P3), Shifou (HT-P4), Liaoyang (HT-P5), and Tongerpu (HT-P6). Pristine groundwater samples used for irrigation and fish farming inland and at the estuary were sampled (Figure 1). Water temperature was measured at 20 cm below the surface. Site descriptions and salinity data are summarized in Table 1. Average salinity was 24.3 ppt at HT-P1 (coastal area), 7.5 ppt at HT-P2 (mouth of river), 3.02 ppt at HT-P3 (brackish water area), and 0.66 ppt at HT-P4 (brackish water area), while HT-P5 and HT-P6 were freshwater zones. Three-liter samples of water were collected from the surface of the river near the water intakes of the drinking-water plant in four sterile 1 L polycarbonate bottles. For HT-P5, water samples were obtained from water pumped from the bottom of a fish farm. The water temperature was measured using a glass thermometer and salinity was measured in the laboratory using an electrical conductivity meter.
From 2018 to 2019, water samples were collected from the HT River. Monthly sampling was conducted from April to November, which covered spring (April to June), summer (July to August), and autumn (September to November). Sampling was not conducted during the remaining months since some of the water sampling sites were frozen. All samples were collected in triplicate at each site and were immediately transported within 8 h to the laboratory for analysis.

2.2. Abundance Analysis of V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus

The presence of three pathogenic Vibrio spp. in water samples was investigated using the most probable number polymerase chain reaction (MPN-PCR) method according to the modified ISO 8914 standard method (ISO 8914:1990) [16]. Briefly, 500 mL of each water sample were concentrated by filtration through a 0.45 μm pore filter (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany) with a vacuum pump, after which the filters were placed in 225 mL of alkaline peptone water (APW; 1% (wt/vol) peptone, 1% (wt/vol) sodium chloride; pH 8.2). After incubation at 30 °C for 18 h, 1 mL aliquots of enrichment broths showing growth were analyzed by PCR to detect the presence of a species-specific toxR gene for V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae [17] and the vvhA gene for V. vulnificus [18].
Moreover, to obtain the isolates, 0.1 mL aliquots of enrichment broths were plated on thiosulfate–citrate–bile salts–sucrose (TCBS) (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and CHROMagar Vibrio (CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France) agar plates and were incubated for 18 h at 30 °C. Presumptive Vibrio spp. colonies were subcultured on TSA. A partial sequence of the 16S rRNA of Vibrio species was amplified by PCR and submitted for sequencing for bacterial identification [19]. Bacterial isolates were stored at −80 °C in LB broth containing 50% (v/v) glycerol.

2.3. MLST Typing of V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae

Seven housekeeping genes were chosen as target genes for MLST analysis of V. parahaemolyticus (adk, metE, mdh, pntA, pyrC, gyrB, purM) and V. cholerae (dnaE, dtdS, pntA, recA, gyrB, pyrC, tnaA), while a 10-gene MLST scheme was used for V. vulnificus [12,20,21]. The primers and PCR amplification protocol are described on the pubMLST website (http://www.pubmlst.org). The amplicons were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and photographed in a gel imaging system. Sequencing was performed at Beijing BGI-GBI Biotech Co., Ltd. The nucleotide sequences and deduced protein sequences were analyzed with EditSeq and Megalign software (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA).

2.4. Detection of Virulence Genes

The virulence genes of V. parahaemolyticus, including tdh, trh, and tlh, were tested by PCR amplification [22,23,24] (Table S1). For V. cholerae, the PCR for the genes hlyA (encoding hemolysin), zot (encoding zonula occludens toxin), ctxA (encoding cholera toxin), tcpA (encoding toxin co-regulated pilus), and rtxA and rtxC (encoding repeats in the structural toxin (RTX)) was carried out as described previously in a final volume of 20 µL [17,25,26,27,28]. In addition, PCR was used to screen for five genes in the Vibrio seventh pandemic island I (VSP-I) cluster (VC0175, VC0178, VC0180, VC0183, and VC0185) and eight genes in the VSP-II cluster (VC0490, VC0493, VC0498, VC0502, VC0504, VC0512, VC0514, and VC0516) [29]. Four virulence genes, vvhA, viuB, rtxA, and pilA, were selected to assess the pathogenicity of V. vulnificus [18].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical tests were considered significant at p < 0.05. Data of environmental parameters are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Spatial and temporal statistically significant differences among samples were evaluated through Mann–Whitney rank sum tests analysis of variance. Spearman correlations (rs) was used to detect the correlations between the presence of V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus and water temperature and salinity. All statistical analysis was performed in SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Seawater Intrusion in the HT River

As shown in Table 1, the seasonal fluctuation of salinity in the HT River was monitored. In this study, a salinity value below 0.5 ppt was defined as fresh water. Results showed that seawater intrusion maximally reached inland as far as 26.5 km (HT-P4) for the HT River in spring (dry season). In the normal season (autumn), the freshwater zone becomes brackish at HT-P4 while the transition between the freshwater and the saltwater zones begins at HT-P3 (around 20.5 km to the seashore) in the rainy season (summer). There was no significant difference in water temperature among the five sites. Overall, salinity was lowest in summer since the majority of the rainfall occurs during the summer in north China.

3.2. The Abundance of V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus

The abundance of three pathogenic Vibrio spp. and their relationship with water temperature and salinity from five sampling sites were determined.
The seasonal and spatial dynamics of Vibrio species in the HT River were investigated in the spring, summer, and autumn in 2018 and 2019. Overall, all the locations exhibited higher abundances of Vibrio spp. during the summer than during the spring/autumn, and the differences between summer and spring/autumn were statistically significant (p < 0.01) (Figure 2). On a spatial scale, significant differences in the abundance of V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus were observed (p = 0.018 and p = 0.017). Moreover, on a temporal scale, the abundance variability of V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus was also significant (p = 0.001 and p = 0.02), which indicates that their abundance might be associated with water temperature.
V. cholerae was detected simultaneously in five surveyed sites from May to October and varied from below the limit of detection (LOD) to 670 MPN/mL, with a median of 67.7 MPN/mL. From the estuary to HT-P5, the concentration of V. cholerae decreased from 195 to 3 MPN/mL. Potential pathogenic ctxA + V. cholerae was not detected throughout the sampling period. Additionally, positive APW broths were streaked onto TCBS agar, and all V. cholerae isolates were confirmed as V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139.
V. parahaemolyticus was detected only in HT-P1, HT-P2, HT-P3, and HT-P4 from May to September. The mean abundance of V. parahaemolyticus was 1.23 × 102 MPN/mL in summer and 10 MPN/mL in autumn, while the average abundance in spring was 11.7 MPN/mL. In addition, the abundance of V. parahaemolyticus rapidly decreased from the estuary to the inland region. V. vulnificus, whose abundance ranged from 11 to 16 MPN/mL, was only detected in two coastal water samples throughout the summer.

3.3. Relationship between Pathogenic Vibrio Species and Environmental Parameters

The correlations between pathogenic Vibrio spp. and environmental parameters observed over time varied significantly. Across the entire dataset, significant positive correlations were observed between water temperature and V. cholerae (rs = 0.667) and V. parahaemolyticus (rs = 0.698) (Table 2).
Moreover, the abundance of V. parahaemolyticus was moderately correlated with salinity (r = 0.232, p = 0.038). Similarly, V. cholerae was not only positively correlated with salinity (r = 0.499, p < 0.01) but was also significantly correlated with V. parahaemolyticus (r = 0.855, p < 0.01), which indicates the coexistence of these two pathogens in the river. As V. vulnificus was only detected in two coastal water samples, Spearman rank correlation analysis was not performed.

3.4. Detection and MLST of Pathogenic Vibrio spp. in the HT River

In total, 45 strains of Vibrio species were isolated, 66.7% of which were V. parahaemolyticus. Thirty V. parahaemolyticus strains were identified in the HT River (from HT-P1 to HT-P3), whereas 12 V. cholerae strains were recovered from all sampling sites (except for HT-P6) (Figure 3). Three V. vulnificus strains were only detected in HT-P1.
MLST of V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae was used to subtype the above isolates into 16 and four sequence types (STs), respectively (Tables S2 and S3). One new ST with the absence of the metE gene, namely, UKN, was found in V. cholerae. MLST of three V. vulnificus strains also showed that they belonged to a new ST (Table S4).
Notably, three V. parahaemolyticus STs were found in three locations of the HT River (ST658 strains were found in HT-P1, P2, and P3; ST1710 and ST114 strains were both obtained in HT-P2 and P3), which indicates that massive seawater backfilling might have occurred to bring V. parahaemolyticus to the inland region.
Together with 50 V. parahaemolyticus strains from Liaoning available (pubMLST.org) and 10 isolates collected from Dalian (Table S5), phylogenetic analysis based on concatenated sequences from seven housekeeping genes was conducted. The results showed that 90 strains can be divided into six clusters; V. parahaemolyticus strains from the HT River were distributed across five clusters (Figure 4A), of which ST1761, ST1756, and ST2007 were also identified previously in Liaoning. Phylogenetic analysis of 12 non-O1/O139 V. cholerae strains with 40 strains from the V. cholerae pubMLST database (Table S6) divided them into three clusters (Figure 4B).
We then analyzed the phylogenetic relationships of the isolated V. vulnificus strains with the other V. vulnificus strains (Table S4). Together with 30 representative public V. vulnificus strains, our primary analysis showed that they can be divided into four lineages; three isolated V. vulnificus strains were clustered with strain 93U204 and belonged to Lineage I (Figure 4C).

3.5. Characterization of Virulence Genes and VSP-I/II Clusters

The PCR results showed that tlh was positive for all V. parahaemolyticus isolates, but none of the V. parahaemolyticus isolates was tdh positive. Two ST1761 isolates were trh positive. In addition, vvhA, pilA, viuB, and rtxA were all detected in three V. vulnificus strains. Likewise, ctxA, tcpA, and zot were not detected in any of the V. cholerae strains, while hlyA, rtxA, and rtxC were positive in all isolates.
We performed PCR to detect fiveOpen Reading Frame (ORFs) in the VSP-I cluster and eight ORFs in the VSP-II cluster. The results showed that none of the ST1419 strains and ST93 strains carried VSP-I/II clusters (Figure 5). Strains HT-P3-UKN and HT-P4-UKN harbored VSP-II island genes, but none carried a complete VSP-I island. Five ST1092 strains were positive for both VSP-I and VSP-II clusters. The positive PCR products were further sequenced and compared with those of V. cholerae O1 El Tor N16961. For VSP-II in the ST1092 isolates, only 10 ORFs were identified, with 86% (VC0516) to 99% sequence identity with ORFs from V. cholerae N16961. These results indicated that the isolates carried incomplete VSP-I/II types.

3.6. Antibiotic Resistance Profiles

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by using a disk diffusion assay of 10 antibiotics for V. vulnificus, V. parahaemolyticus, and non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae isolates obtained in this study (n = 45). No significant difference among the sites on the HT River was observed, nor was there a significant difference according to the isolation season. Multidrug-resistant isolates were not detected (Tables S2 and S3). All of the Vibrio isolates were sensitive to chloramphenicol, florfenicol, kanamycin, and streptomycin. Of the 45 environmental isolates, 15 isolates showed resistance to two of the antibiotics tested: two showed resistance to both sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and penicillin, six V. cholerae isolates showed resistance to penicillin and tetracycline, three V. parahaemolyticus isolates showed resistance to penicillin and erythromycin (water samples from the HT River) and four exhibited resistance to penicillin and norfloxacin. Intermediate resistance to ciprofloxacin (9.1% of isolates) and norfloxacin (5.4%) was also detected.

4. Discussion

4.1. Seawater Intrusion Potentially Impacts on the Distribution of Pathogenic Vibrio Species

Diarrhea remains a global public health enigma since contaminated water sources often pose a threat to community health. Although several reports have documented the presence of human pathogenic Vibrio spp. in the estuary regions of China, studies regarding the distribution of V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus in the inland river regions are scarce. Fukushima and Seki [30] conducted a multi-year study on the ecology of V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus in brackish environments of the Sada River. In their study, V. parahaemolyticus was isolated from river mouths and brackish rivers with an average salinity as low as 4.4 ± 2.0 ppt at cell concentrations of 10−3 to 10 MPN mL−1. In contrast, similar concentrations of V. vulnificus were only isolated from coastal environments with an average salinity 24.0 ± 5.4 ppt, suggesting that both organisms are continuously distributed in the Sada River. In the present study, the combined MPN-PCR method was selected since it has been widely used in studies to assess Vibrio species occurrence and dynamics. We have monitored the occurrence and abundance of three major potential human pathogenic Vibrio species (V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus) in a typical river of north China. The potential pathogenicity and antimicrobial drug resistance of the isolates were also assessed. By monitoring the abundances of pathogenic Vibrio species and characterizing the pathogenic species by MLST over 2 years (2018–2019), our 2-year survey revealed that V. cholerae were permanently present in all water column fractions during 2018–2019 in the river except for HT-P6. In contrast, the survival of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus was only observed in the brackish water area. Notably, five STs of V. parahaemolyticus and four STs of V. cholerae emerged in the various inland locations of the HT River, indicating that seawater intrusion promoted reversed dissemination of V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae from the estuary to inland.
The association between water temperature and salinity with the occurrence of three pathogenic Vibrio spp. has been previously described in different geographic locations, such as in Chesapeake Bay and eastern North Carolina [6,31]. This study confirmed the above observations. The abundance of V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus were both positively correlated with the water temperature and salinity. Interestingly, the abundance of V. cholerae was also strongly correlated with the number of V. parahaemolyticus, probably because both species are well adapted to the brackish waters [30]. No pathogenic Vibrio spp. was identified in April, October, or November, when the water temperature is below 15 °C. In response to decreasing temperature, the three pathogenic Vibrio species studied here may enter a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state in estuarine waters [32]. In early June, when the water temperature rises to 15 °C, both organisms grew in 3 to 102 MPN mL−1 of water. The number of both organisms peaked in August when the temperature was highest. Notably, the salinity decreased as the sampling areas moved from the estuary to areas that were further inland. Accordingly, the total abundance of V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae contrasted with the abundance in various sampling sites in the drainage of Wuhan Seafood Market with a higher abundance observed as the estuary was approached. The peaks of V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae at stations HT-P1 and HT-P2 on the HT River coincided with higher salinity values. However, it is still unclear whether the fluctuation of temperature and salinity would induce the VBNC state, which requires future investigation. Overall, this study suggested that seawater intrusion accelerated the transmission of pathogenic Vibrio spp. towards the inland areas, which poses a threat to the safety of drinking water.

4.2. Identification of Virulence Factors in Pathogenic Vibrio spp. and Its Implication for Risk Management of the River

The HT River currently lacks systematic surveillance for potentially human pathogenic environmental Vibrio spp. This study provided the first spatiotemporal distribution and pathogenic characteristics of V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae that are present in the river. Several pathogenic Vibrio spp. with various virulence factors were identified in inland areas. Interestingly, four STs of V. parahaemolyticus were also reported in a previous study that investigated the genetic diversity of V. parahaemolyticus in Liaoning Province [33]. This finding suggested that the majority of V. parahaemolyticus isolates were likely endemic in this region.
V. parahaemolyticus processes various virulence factors, including toxin genes, the type III secretion system (T3SS), thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH), and TDH-related hemolysin (TRH), which are associated with hemolysis and cytotoxicity activity in host cells [34]. The T3SS is an apparatus that secretes and delivers virulence factor proteins directly into eukaryotic host cells [35]. T3SS2 is mainly present in clinical isolates of V. parahaemolyticus, while T3SS1 is highly conserved and widespread in both environmental and clinical isolates of V. parahaemolyticus [36]. In this study, ST1761 strains isolated from the HT River harbored trh, which indicates a potential public health risk posed by these environmental strains. Moreover, the identification of V. vulnificus, which was positive for four virulence genes, also signifies a severe threat to the drinking water source and human health.
For V. cholerae, three virulence profiles (RTX + hlyA, RTX + hlyA + VSP-II, and RTX + hlyA + VSP-II + VSP-I) were found over the entire study period. This finding is consistent with the observation made by Gong et al. [37], who reported a diverse set of genes among non-O1/O139 strains from the Yangtze River estuary. The cholera toxin (CT) and toxin coregulated pilus (TCP), which are two major virulence factors of the toxigenic V. cholerae serotypes O1 and O139, were both absent in two rivers from 2018–2019. However, several accessory virulence-associated genes, including the hlyA gene and the RTX cluster, were identified in all of the V. cholerae isolates. The hlyA gene is a pore-forming cytotoxin that induces vacuolation of eukaryotic host cells and ultimately leads to cell lysis [38]. VSP-II was acquired by the 6th pandemic O1 classical strains via horizontal gene transfer. Taviani et al. (2010) suggested that the presence of this genomic island might confer a selective advantage to toxigenic V. cholerae in human hosts [39]. The RTX cluster is commonly present in non-O1/O139 V. cholerae strains, and V. cholerae strains with RTX toxin alone have caused infections [14]. As these accessory virulence-associated genes have been identified in non-O1/O139 strains from patients with diarrhea, these virulence factors alone or combined might be responsible for the illness. In this setting, precautions should be taken for these environmental strains that pose a potential public health risk.
The fish farms on the HT River were the top three producers of ornamental fish in China. Since August 2017, massive outbreaks of ornamental fish disease occurred in several fish farms on the HT River, resulting in the frequent clean-up of the fish pond and enormous discharges of wastewater [40]. Antibiotics such as florfenicol, fluoroquinolone, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline have also been widely used for the treatment of fish diseases in the farms along the river with the frequent emergence of multi-drug-resistant pathogens [40]. Intensive farming forms the bulk of aquaculture and agriculture production along the HT River, which involves high-level inputs of feed as well as high stocking density. The effluent from aquafarms is discharged directly to the rivers through pipelines or open trenches. In addition, due to the extensive use of disinfectants, and the constant threat of oxygen deficiency, nitrification is severely hindered; hence, ammonia and nitrite accumulation takes place.
Therefore, the discharge of the wastewater, combined with the effects of seawater intrusion on the HT River signifies a severe risk to the drinking water source. Adaptive efforts should be focused on the correct treatment of sewage effluent and aquaculture wastewater to avoid the salinization and eutrophication of estuaries and rivers. The development of long-term monitoring of seawater intrusion for drinking and recreational water sources is also urgently needed.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study revealed that seawater intrusion was a potential driving force to shape the distribution of pathogenic Vibrio spp. in the HT River. We also evaluated the possible pathogenicity of the isolates, suggesting a potential health risk associated with pathogenic Vibrio spp. in the HT River. Stringent pollution controls and continuous pathogen surveillance for the water sources in the HT River are suggested to minimize the potential risk of Vibrio infection.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6781/s1, Table S1: Primers sequence used for qPCR and PCR amplification. Table S2: Antibiotic resistance profile of V. parahaemolyticus strains in HT river. Table S3: Antibiotic resistance profile of V. chorerae and V. vulnificus strains in HT River. Table S4: V. vulnificus isolates used from this study and pubmlst database. Table S5: V. parahaemolyticus isolates used from pubmlst database. Table S6: V. chorerae isolates used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.F. and Q.Y.; methodology, Q.W.; software, Q.W.; validation, Q.W., J.H. and C.Z.; formal analysis, Q.Y.; investigation, Q.W.; resources, J.H.; data curation, C.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.W.; writing—review and editing, S.F., Y.L. and Q.Y.; visualization, C.Z.; supervision, Y.L.; project administration, S.F.; funding acquisition, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 81903372, and the Liaoning Science & Technology Project, grant number 2017203002 and the APC was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 81903372.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shibo Jin and Xudong Shen for the sampling assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Thompson, F.L.; Iida, T.; Swings, J. Biodiversity of vibrios. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2004, 68, 403–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ceccarelli, D.; Colwell, R.R. Vibrio ecology, pathogenesis, and evolution. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Didelot, X.; Pang, B.; Zhou, Z.; McCann, A.; Ni, P.; Li, D.; Achtman, M.; Kan, B. The role of China in the global spread of the current cholera pandemic. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Letchumanan, V.; Yin, W.F.; Lee, L.H.; Chan, K.G. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from retail shrimps in Malaysia. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Froelich, B.; Oliver, J. Orientation of mannitol related genes can further differentiate strains of Vibrio vulnificus possessing the vcgC allele. Adv. Stud. Biol. 2011, 3, 151–160. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ceccarelli, D.; Chen, A.; Hasan, N.A.; Rashed, S.M.; Huq, A.; Colwell, R.R. Non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae carrying multiple virulence factors and V. cholerae O1 in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 1909–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Esteves, K.; Hervio-Heath, D.; Mosser, T.; Rodier, C.; Tournoud, M.G.; Jumas-Bilak, E.; Colwell, R.R.; Monfort, P. Rapid proliferation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus, and Vibrio cholerae during freshwater flash floods in French Mediterranean coastal lagoons. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 7600–7609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Voynova, Y.G.; Brix, H.; Petersen, W.; Weigelt-Krenz, S.; Scharfe, M. Extreme flood impact on estuarine and coastal biogeochemistry: The 2013 Elbe flood. Biogeosciences 2017, 14, 541–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Torresi, M.; Sperandii, A.; Ricci, L.; Prencipe, V.; Migliorati, G.; Pomilio, F. Detection and characterisation of potentially pathogenic species of Vibrio in the Vibrata river, Abruzzo Region, Italy. Vet. Ital. 2018, 54, 125–135. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mo, Q.H.; Wang, H.B.; Tan, H.; An, S.L.; Feng, Z.L.; Wang, Q.; Lin, J.C.; Yang, Z. Optimization and head-to-head comparison of MISSR-PCR, ERIC-PCR, RAPD and 16S rRNA evolutionary clock for the genotyping of Vibrio cholerae isolated in China. Indian. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 33, 516–523. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chahorm, K.; Prakitchaiwattana, C. Application of Reverse Transcriptase-PCR-DGGE as a rapid method for routine determination of Vibrio spp. in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 264, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gonzalez-Escalona, N.; Martinez-Urtaza, J.; Romero, J.; Espejo, R.T.; Jaykus, L.A.; DePaola, A. Determination of molecular phylogenetics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains by multilocus sequence typing. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 2831–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gonzalez-Escalona, N.; Jolley, K.A.; Reed, E.; Martinez-Urtaza, J. Defining a Core Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme for the Global Epidemiology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 1682–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fu, S.; Hao, J.; Jin, S.; Wu, K.; Wang, Y.; Ye, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, R. A Human Intestinal Infection Caused by a Novel Non-O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae Genotype and Its Dissemination Along the River. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qu, X.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, M.; Liu, X.; Peng, W. Sediment heavy metals and benthic diversities in Hun-Tai River, northeast of China. Environ. Sci. Pollut.Res. Int. 2017, 24, 10662–10673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Blanco-Abad, V.; Ansede-Bermejo, J.; Rodriguez-Castro, A.; Martinez-Urtaza, J. Evaluation of different procedures for the optimized detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in mussels and environmental samples. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 129, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Neogi, S.B.; Chowdhury, N.; Asakura, M.; Hinenoya, A.; Haldar, S.; Saidi, S.M.; Kogure, K.; Lara, R.J.; Yamasaki, S. A highly sensitive and specific multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 51, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Natividad-Bonifacio, I.; Fernandez, F.J.; Quinones-Ramirez, E.I.; Curiel-Quesada, E.; Vazquez-Salinas, C. Presence of virulence markers in environmental Vibrio vulnificus strains. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 1539–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bosshard, P.P.; Santini, Y.; Gruter, D.; Stettler, R.; Bachofen, R. Bacterial diversity and community composition in the chemocline of the meromictic alpine Lake Cadagno as revealed by 16S rDNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2000, 31, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lee, J.H.; Han, K.H.; Choi, S.Y.; Lucas, M.; Mondlane, C.; Ansaruzzaman, M.; Nair, G.B.; Sack, D.A.; von Seidlein, L.; Clemens, J.D.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor isolates from Mozambique that harbour the classical CTX prophage. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Reynaud, Y.; Pitchford, S.; De Decker, S.; Wikfors, G.H.; Brown, C.L. Molecular typing of environmental and clinical strains of Vibrio vulnificus isolated in the northeastern USA. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Tada, J.; Ohashi, T.; Nishimura, N.; Shirasaki, Y.; Ozaki, H.; Fukushima, S.; Takano, J.; Nishibuchi, M.; Takeda, Y. Detection of the thermostable direct hemolysin gene (tdh) and the thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin gene (trh) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by polymerase chain reaction. Mol. Cell. Probes. 1992, 6, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tarr, C.L.; Patel, J.S.; Puhr, N.D.; Sowers, E.G.; Bopp, C.A.; Strockbine, N.A. Identification of Vibrio isolates by a multiplex PCR assay and rpoB sequence determination. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Noriea, N.R.; Johnson, C.N.; Griffitt, K.J.; Grimes, D.J. Distribution of type III secretion systems in Vibrio parahaemolyticus from the northern Gulf of Mexico. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 953–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nandi, B.; Nandy, R.K.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Nair, G.B.; Shimada, T.; Ghose, A.C. Rapid method for species-specific identification of Vibrio cholerae using primers targeted to the gene of outer membrane protein OmpW. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 4145–4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rivera, I.N.; Chun, J.; Huq, A.; Sack, R.B.; Colwell, R.R. Genotypes associated with virulence in environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2421–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chatterjee, S.; Ghosh, K.; Raychoudhuri, A.; Chowdhury, G.; Bhattacharya, M.K.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K.; Ramamurthy, T.; Bhattacharya, S.K.; Klose, K.E.; Nandy, R.K. Incidence, virulence factors, and clonality among clinical strains of non-O1, non-O139 Vibrio cholerae isolates from hospitalized diarrheal patients in Kolkata, India. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhou, Y.Y.; Yang, W.M.; Li, S.S. Analysis of virulence and drug resistance of clinical isolates of non-O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae. Euro Surveill. 2016, 31, 517–521. [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Shea, Y.A.; Reen, F.J.; Quirke, A.M.; Boyd, E.F. Evolutionary genetic analysis of the emergence of epidemic Vibrio cholerae isolates on the basis of comparative nucleotide sequence analysis and multilocus virulence gene profiles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 4657–4671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Fukushima, H.; Seki, R. Ecology of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in brackish environments of the Sada River in Shimane Prefecture, Japan. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 48, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pfeffer, C.S.; Hite, M.F.; Oliver, J.D. Ecology of Vibrio vulnificus in estuarine waters of eastern North Carolina. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 3526–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Xu, H.; Roberts, N.; Singleton, F.L.; Attwell, R.W.; Grimes, D.J.; Colwell, R.R. Survival and viability of nonculturable Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment. Microb. Ecol. 1982, 8, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jiang, Y.; Chu, Y.; Xie, G.; Li, F.; Wang, L.; Huang, J.; Zhai, Y.; Yao, L. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence and genetic relationship of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood from coasts of Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea, China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 290, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nishibuchi, M.; Fasano, A.; Russell, R.G.; Kaper, J.B. Enterotoxigenicity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus with and without genes encoding thermostable direct hemolysin. Infect. Immun. 1992, 60, 3539–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Park, K.S.; Ono, T.; Rokuda, M.; Jang, M.H.; Okada, K.; Iida, T.; Honda, T. Functional characterization of two type III secretion systems of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 6659–6665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Okada, N.; Iida, T.; Park, K.S.; Goto, N.; Yasunaga, T.; Hiyoshi, H.; Matsuda, S.; Kodama, T.; Honda, T. Identification and characterization of a novel type III secretion system in trh-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain TH3996 reveal genetic lineage and diversity of pathogenic machinery beyond the species level. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 904–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Gong, L.; Yu, P.; Zheng, H.; Gu, W.; He, W.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Peng, X.; She, Q.; et al. Comparative genomics for non-O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae isolates recovered from the Yangtze River Estuary versus V. cholerae representative isolates from serogroup O1. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 2019, 294, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Figueroa-Arredondo, P.; Heuser, J.E.; Akopyants, N.S.; Morisaki, J.H.; Giono-Cerezo, S.; Enriquez-Rincon, F.; Berg, D.E. Cell vacuolation caused by Vibrio cholerae hemolysin. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 1613–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Taviani, E.; Grim, C.J.; Choi, J.; Chun, J.; Haley, B.; Hasan, N.A.; Huq, A.; Colwell, R.R. Discovery of novel Vibrio cholerae VSP-II genomic islands using comparative genomic analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 308, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fu, S.; Ni, P.; Wang, Y.; Jin, S.; Jiang, Z.; Ye, S.; Li, R. Delineating the origins of the multidrug-resistant pathogens in ornamental fish farms by multilocus sequence typing and identification of a novel multidrug-resistant plasmid. Can. J. Microbiol. 2019, 65, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 17 06781 g001 550
Figure 1. Sampling sites in this study. The sampling positions on the Hun-Tai River are indicated in the square. The sampling sites were mapped by ArcGIS Desktop 10.2 software (http://desktop.arcgis.com/). Sampling sites on the Hun-Tai (HT) River include estuary wetland (HT-P1), Dukou Port (HT-P2), Shuiyuan (HT-P3), Shifou (HT-P4), Liaoyang (HT-P5), and Tongerpu (HT-P6).
Figure 1. Sampling sites in this study. The sampling positions on the Hun-Tai River are indicated in the square. The sampling sites were mapped by ArcGIS Desktop 10.2 software (http://desktop.arcgis.com/). Sampling sites on the Hun-Tai (HT) River include estuary wetland (HT-P1), Dukou Port (HT-P2), Shuiyuan (HT-P3), Shifou (HT-P4), Liaoyang (HT-P5), and Tongerpu (HT-P6).
Ijerph 17 06781 g001
Ijerph 17 06781 g002 550
Figure 2. Relationship between the most probable number (MPN) of V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus and water temperature measured at the five sampling sites on the HT River. V. cholerae (VC), V. parahaemolyticus (VP), V. vulnificus (VV) and water temperature (WT). Large black arrows indicate an increase in river depth after heavy rain.
Figure 2. Relationship between the most probable number (MPN) of V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus and water temperature measured at the five sampling sites on the HT River. V. cholerae (VC), V. parahaemolyticus (VP), V. vulnificus (VV) and water temperature (WT). Large black arrows indicate an increase in river depth after heavy rain.
Ijerph 17 06781 g002
Ijerph 17 06781 g003 550
Figure 3. Location of V. parahaemolyticus- and V. cholerae-positive sampling sites on the HT River. The V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae sequence types in various sampling sites are indicated in the cycles on the left and right side of the rivers, respectively.
Figure 3. Location of V. parahaemolyticus- and V. cholerae-positive sampling sites on the HT River. The V. parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae sequence types in various sampling sites are indicated in the cycles on the left and right side of the rivers, respectively.
Ijerph 17 06781 g003
Ijerph 17 06781 g004 550
Figure 4. Neighbor-joining tree based on concatenated sequences of seven housekeeping genes from V. parahaemolyticus (A), V. cholerae (B), and V. vulnificus (C). The numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values based on 1000 replications. The phylogeny was inferred by the neighbor-joining method in MEGA7.0. The strains listed in Tables S2–S4 have been included. UKN: Unknown ST. Blue dot: The strains were isolated in this study. Red dot: trh gene was positive.
Figure 4. Neighbor-joining tree based on concatenated sequences of seven housekeeping genes from V. parahaemolyticus (A), V. cholerae (B), and V. vulnificus (C). The numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values based on 1000 replications. The phylogeny was inferred by the neighbor-joining method in MEGA7.0. The strains listed in Tables S2–S4 have been included. UKN: Unknown ST. Blue dot: The strains were isolated in this study. Red dot: trh gene was positive.
Ijerph 17 06781 g004
Ijerph 17 06781 g005 550
Figure 5. Characterization of virulence genes and Vibrio seventh pandemic island I/II (VSP-I/II) clusters in non-O1/O139 V. cholerae isolates. PCR primers are shown as blue arrows, and the color gradient from yellow to red indicates the similarity of VSP-I/II clusters in non-O1/O139 V. cholerae and strain N16961 (reference).
Figure 5. Characterization of virulence genes and Vibrio seventh pandemic island I/II (VSP-I/II) clusters in non-O1/O139 V. cholerae isolates. PCR primers are shown as blue arrows, and the color gradient from yellow to red indicates the similarity of VSP-I/II clusters in non-O1/O139 V. cholerae and strain N16961 (reference).
Ijerph 17 06781 g005
Table
Table 1. Water temperature and salinity in six sampling sites of the HT River.
Table 1. Water temperature and salinity in six sampling sites of the HT River.
SiteSpring Summer Autumn
WT (°C) Salinity (‰)WT (°C)Salinity (‰)WT (°C)Salinity (‰)
HT-P113.4 ± 3.326.8 ± 1.727.8 ± 1.324.7 ± 2.415.25 ± 5.132.3 ± 1.5
HT-P213.4 ± 7.68.78 ± 1.727.5 ± 1.44.67 ± 1.614.4 ± 4.38.08 ± 1.8
HT-P312.57 ± 1.84.3 ± 0.7826.8 ± 1.31.1 ± 0.815.47 ± 5.63.1 ± 1.21
HT-P413.67 ± 3.11.05 ± 0.6524.9 ± 3.10.45 ± 0.214.4 ± 5.80.41 ± 0.09
HT-P513.27 ± 3.20.53 ± 0.2527 ± 1.20.12 ± 0.2113.6 ± 3.10.23 ± 0.12
HT-P613.1 ± 3.2026.4 ± 3.2013.1 ± 3.20
WT: water temperature; salinity was counted at high tide from three samples, then these data were taken from an enumeration of the average salinity.
Table
Table 2. Spearman rank correlations (rs) of pathogenic Vibrio spp. abundance with environmental variables in the Hun-Tai River.
Table 2. Spearman rank correlations (rs) of pathogenic Vibrio spp. abundance with environmental variables in the Hun-Tai River.
Variables V. choleraeV. parahaemolyticus
Salinityrs0.499 **0.332 *
p<0.010.038
Temperaturers0.667 **0.698 **
p<0.01<0.01
V. choleraers/0.855 **
p/<0.01
* and ** indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Fu, S.; Yang, Q.; Hao, J.; Zhou, C.; Liu, Y. The Impact of Water Intrusion on Pathogenic Vibrio Species to Inland Brackish Waters of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186781

AMA Style

Wang Q, Fu S, Yang Q, Hao J, Zhou C, Liu Y. The Impact of Water Intrusion on Pathogenic Vibrio Species to Inland Brackish Waters of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(18):6781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qingyao, Songzhe Fu, Qian Yang, Jingwei Hao, Can Zhou, and Ying Liu. 2020. "The Impact of Water Intrusion on Pathogenic Vibrio Species to Inland Brackish Waters of China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 18: 6781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186781

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop