Next Article in Journal
Towards Fair AI: Mitigating Bias in Credit Decisions—A Systematic Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Nexus Between Fintech Innovations and Liquidity Risk in GCC Banks: The Moderating Role of Bank Size
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modelling Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall for a Small Capital Market: Do Fractionally Integrated Models and Regime Shifts Matter?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Factors, Forecasts, and Simulations of Volatility in the Stock Market Using Machine Learning

by
Juan Mansilla-Lopez
1,
David Mauricio
2,* and
Alejandro Narváez
3
1
Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, 210 Túpac Amaru Ave, Lima 15333, Peru
2
Facultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Informática, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, 375 Carlos Germán Amezaga Ave, Lima 15081, Peru
3
Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, 375 Carlos Germán Amezaga Ave, Lima 15081, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2025, 18(5), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050227
Submission received: 24 February 2025 / Revised: 19 March 2025 / Accepted: 18 April 2025 / Published: 24 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning Based Risk Management in Finance and Insurance)

Abstract

Volatility is a risk indicator for the stock market, and its measurement is important for investors’ decisions; however, few studies have investigated it. Only two systematic reviews focusing on volatility have been identified. In addition, with the advance of artificial intelligence, several machine learning algorithms should be reviewed. This article provides a systematic review of the factors, forecasts and simulations of volatility in the stock market using machine learning (ML) in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) review selection guidelines. From the initial 105 articles that were identified from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, 40 articles met the inclusion criteria and, thus, were included in the review. The findings show that publication trends exhibit a growth in interest in stock market volatility; fifteen factors influence volatility in six categories: news, politics, irrationality, health, economics, and war; twenty-seven prediction models based on ML algorithms, many of them hybrid, have been identified, including recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory, support vector machines, support regression machines, and artificial neural networks; and finally, five hybrid simulation models that combine Monte Carlo simulations with other optimization techniques are identified. In conclusion, the review process shows a movement in volatility studies from classic to ML-based simulations owing to the greater precision obtained by hybrid algorithms.
Keywords: volatility; stock market; forecasting; simulation; factors volatility; stock market; forecasting; simulation; factors

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mansilla-Lopez, J.; Mauricio, D.; Narváez, A. Factors, Forecasts, and Simulations of Volatility in the Stock Market Using Machine Learning. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2025, 18, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050227

AMA Style

Mansilla-Lopez J, Mauricio D, Narváez A. Factors, Forecasts, and Simulations of Volatility in the Stock Market Using Machine Learning. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2025; 18(5):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mansilla-Lopez, Juan, David Mauricio, and Alejandro Narváez. 2025. "Factors, Forecasts, and Simulations of Volatility in the Stock Market Using Machine Learning" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 18, no. 5: 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050227

APA Style

Mansilla-Lopez, J., Mauricio, D., & Narváez, A. (2025). Factors, Forecasts, and Simulations of Volatility in the Stock Market Using Machine Learning. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(5), 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050227

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop