Next Article in Journal
A New Approach to Optimal Location and Sizing of DSTATCOM in Radial Distribution Networks Using Bio-Inspired Cuckoo Search Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Concentration on the Charge Storage Kinetics of Nanostructured MnO2 Thin-Film Supercapacitors Synthesized by the Hydrothermal Method
Previous Article in Journal
Degraded Trees from Spruce Budworm Epidemics as Bioenergy Feedstock: A Profitability Analysis of Forest Operations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hierarchical Manganese–Iron-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets for Asymmetric Supercapacitors

1
Department of Physics, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Korea
2
Korea Photonics Technology Institute, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61007, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(18), 4616; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184616
Submission received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 23 August 2020 / Accepted: 1 September 2020 / Published: 4 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials for Supercapacitor Electrodes)

Abstract

:
This work presents a synthesis of hierarchical manganese–iron-layered double hydroxide (MnFe-LDH) nanostructured electrodes using the hydrothermal synthesis route by varying the reaction time for electrochemical energy storage applications. The electrochemical behavior of the MnFe-LDH electrodes synthesized at different reaction times was analyzed in a three-electrode cell configuration using 2 M KOH electrolyte. The uniform and well-organized MnFe-LDH nanosheet electrode (MnFe-12h) showed the maximum areal capacitance of 2013 mFcm−2 at a 5 mVs−1 scan rate, and 1886 mFcm−2 at a 25 mA applied current. Furthermore, the electrochemical behavior of MnFe-12h was examined by assembling an asymmetric cell device using activated carbon (AC) as a negative electrode and MnFe-12h as a positive electrode and it was tested in a wide voltage window range of 0.0 to 1.6 V. This asymmetric cell device achieved an appropriate energy density of 44.9 µW h cm−2 (55.01 W h kg−1), with a power density of 16 mW cm−2 (5000 W kg−1) at an applied current of 10 mA, and had a long-term cycling stability (93% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles) within the 1.6 V operating voltage window.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The current global situation due to climate change demands green energy alternatives such as renewable energies in order to preserve our ecosystem. It is highly essential to store these renewable energies to be able to use them on demand. Supercapacitors (SCs), also known as ultracapacitors owing to their high capacitance, are the most appealing energy storage systems. The fast charge–discharge rate, good cycling stability, high power density, low cost, and eco-friendliness of SCs is the reason why people are turning their attention to them [1,2,3]. The charge storage mechanisms in SCs classify them as electric double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) and pseudocapacitors. In EDLCs, the adsorption/desorption of electrolytic ions takes place in the space charge double-layer region of the material, leading to limited energy density. In pseudocapacitors, the energy can be stored to a greater degree due to the faradaic charge transfer process [4,5].
Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have attracted much attention as an electrode material for supercapacitors owing to their high surface area, high redox activity, highly interconnected morphology, low cost, and environmental benignness [6,7]. The hydroxide layers in the LDH structure contain positive charges and anions among the layers. LDHs possess flexible anionic exchange and a laminar structure that helps electron and ion transport during the charging/discharging process in SCs [8]. Additionally, the hydrophilicity in LDHs is highly favorable for the diffusion of ions in aqueous electrolyte. Among the various LDH structures, NiAl-LDH, NiCo-LDH, MnCo-LDH, and NiFe-LDH structures are widely used as supercapacitor electrodes as well as for catalysis applications [9,10,11,12]. Bagavathi et al. fabricated Co-Ni LDH using the electrophoretic deposition technique, which produced a specific capacitance of 1931 Fg−1 [13]. They synthesized these nanostructures without any aid from additives and binders. In a recent effort, Tyagi et al. synthesized a less explored Ni-V LDH structure using the hydrothermal route, which showed a specific capacitance of 1581 Fg−1 [14]. Wang et al. reported a specific capacitance of 2762.7 Fg−1 for Ni-Co LDH from 2-methylimidazole by varying the Ni/Co ratio as 4:1 [8]. In an attempt to synthesize a ternary LDH hybrid for a supercapacitor, Li et al. fabricated NiMnCr-LDH coated on a carbon sphere, which yielded a specific capacity of 569 C g−1 at 3 Ag−1 [15]. An asymmetric supercapacitor was fabricated by Li et al. based on a (Ni,Co)Se2/NiCo-LDH core-shell with a specific capacitance of 1224 Fg−1 [16]. The aforementioned results in the literature affirm the potential of LDH structures as an electrode material for pseudocapacitors and asymmetric supercapacitors.
Despite the fact that many LDH composites are involved in supercapacitor studies, MnFe-LDH is a versatile electrode material for pseudocapacitor studies as it can replace the carbon-based supercapacitor that is capable of producing a high energy density. In the MnFe-LDH structure, the introduction of manganese helps to improve the electrochemical activity due to its multiple oxidation states. Similarly, Fe was incorporated into the LDH composite because the Fe ions in the host layers can deliver numerous redox reactions during the electrochemical process, as well as the fact that iron is much cheaper than other metals such as cobalt and aluminum and is plentiful in nature [17,18]. MnFe-LDH can be grown using different chemical synthesis routes such as electrospinning, co-precipitation, hydrothermal synthesis, etc., and it is being used for multiple applications [19,20,21,22]. So far, MnFe-LDH has found its application in MRI contrast enhancement, drug release, and oxygen evolution catalysts, among others. Furthermore, it is surprising to learn that no study has been reported on MnFe-LDH for supercapacitor studies [20,22].
Herein, we propose a first attempt to fabricate a MnFe-LDH structure for a supercapacitor study using a simple and scalable hydrothermal synthesis route. MnFe-LDH electrodes were synthesized by varying the hydrothermal reaction time from 9 to 24 h and the electrochemical behavior was analyzed in a three-electrode cell configuration using 2 M KOH electrolyte. A maximum areal capacitance of 2013 mFcm−2 at a 5 mVs−1 scan rate and 1886 mFcm−2 at a 25 mA applied current were achieved for the uniform and well-organized MnFe-LDH nanosheet electrode (MnFe-12h). Moreover, an asymmetric cell device using activated carbon as a negative electrode and MnFe-12h as a positive electrode was assembled and tested in a wide voltage window range of 0.0 to 1.6 V. This asymmetric cell device achieved an appropriate energy density of 44.9 µW h cm−2 (50.01 W h kg−1), with a power density of 16 mW cm−2 (5000 W kg−1) at an applied current of 10 mA, and had a long-term cycling stability (93% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles) within the 1.6 V operating voltage window.

2. Experimental Details

Synthesis of MnFe-LDH Hexagonal Sheets

MnFe-LDH was deposited on Ni foam using a facile hydrothermal technique. The solution for the hydrothermal reaction was first prepared using different precursor solutions. The manganese precursor (0.01 M KMnO4), iron precursor (0.01 M FeSO4), and 0.01 M urea were dissolved in 60 mL deionized (DI) water in a 100 mL glass beaker and stirred for 15 min. The obtained mixture was then poured into a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. Subsequently, the Ni foam was placed deep into the mixture. The hydrothermal reaction was carried out in an oven at 140 °C for 9 h. Finally, the hydrothermal autoclave was brought down to room temperature naturally. DI water was used to wash the Ni foam and it was air-dried. The prepared electrode was marked as MnFe-9h. Similarly, the hydrothermal reactions were carried out for 12 and 24 h and the samples were marked as MnFe-12h and MnFe-24h, respectively.

3. Characterization of Electrodes

X-ray diffraction (XRD; Panalytical, Malvern, UK) was performed using Cu Kα radiation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; K-alpha, Thermo Scientific, Loughborough, UK) was used to govern the surface chemical composition. The surface features of the film were analyzed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM; S-4800 HITACHI, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Electrochemical measurements, including cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) measurements, were performed in 2 M KOH electrolyte in a conventional three-electrode arrangement consisting of synthesized MnFe-LDH as a working electrode, graphite as a counter electrode, and saturated calomel as a reference electrode (SCE) using a ZIVE SP5 electrochemical workstation (WonAtech, Seoul, Korea). For each electrode, the area of the deposited MnFe-LDH was constant (1 cm × 1 cm). For the two electrode measurements, an asymmetric cell device was fabricated using MnFe-12h as a positive electrode and activated carbon (AC) as a negative electrode. The AC electrode was prepared as mentioned in our previous report [18]. Briefly, to prepare the AC electrode, the activated carbon, binder poly (tetrafluoroethylene), and carbon black in a weight ratio of 80:10:10 were mixed together. The obtained mixture was coated onto the Ni foam and then air-dried at 75 °C for 12 h. The device was assembled by inserting filter paper soaked in 2 M KOH between the positive (MnFe-12h) and negative (AC) electrodes and sealed using Parafilm. The detailed schematic representation of the asymmetric device fabrication is as shown in Figure 1b.

4. Results and Discussion

The schematic illustration of the formation of different nanostructures of MnFe-LDH using the hydrothermal route with varying reaction times is depicted in Figure 1a. The hydrothermal reaction mainly comprises the hydrolysis of urea (CO(NH2)2, which produces OH ions. These released OH ions interact with the dissociated Mn2+ and Fe2+ ions from KMnO4 and FeSO4, respectively, forming MnFe-hydroxide [11,17]. The probable chemical reactions happening during the formation of MnFe-hydroxide through hydrothermal treatment can be signified by the following reactions:
C O ( N H 2 ) 2 + H 2 O 2 N H 3 + C O 2
N H 3 + H 2 O N H 4 + + O H
M n 2 + + F e 2 + + O H M n F e L D H

4.1. FESEM

The surface morphological features of the MnFe-LDH electrode were studied by FESEM. Figure 2a–l shows FESEM images of the MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h and MnFe-24h samples. In the FESEM images at lower magnification (Figure 2a,e,i), it is clearly seen that the Ni foam’s surface is fully covered by the synthesized MnFe-LDH material, for all synthesized electrodes grown at 9, 12, and 24 h, respectively. Initially, after a 9 h hydrothermal reaction, an aggregation of nanoparticles of the MnFe-LDH structure appears, as shown in Figure 2a–d, and a partial growth of the nanosheet is also observed. As the reaction time goes on, increasing to 12 h, the nanoparticle aggregates are turned into a network of interconnected nanosheets (Figure 2e–h). These MnFe-LDH nanosheets appear in a bunch resembling petals of a flower. It should be noted that the large number of even and dense MnFe-LDH nanosheets is seen firmly anchored on the whole surface of the Ni foam. The nanosheets are very thin, with an average thickness of ~15–20 nm. The thin and interconnected nanosheets are highly beneficial for ionic transport, mainly due to their enhanced reactive surface area. Similarly, the layered structure of LDHs offers an easy access to electrolyte ions to diffuse through the entire nanosheet, which is useful for a highly efficient utilization of active sites [23]. Finally, for the 24 h hydrothermal reaction time, the formation of large leaf-like nanostructures with voids in between these nanostructures is observed (Figure 2i–l); this may be due to the higher reaction time. Figure 3a–d shows the EDS elemental mapping of the MnFe-LDH electrode, affirming the presence of the elements Mn, Fe, and O. The green regions in the images are the manganese-containing regions (Figure 3b), red regions belong to the iron distribution (Figure 3b), whereas the cyan region indicates the presence of the oxygen-containing portions (Figure 3c) of the MnFe-12h electrode.

4.2. XRD

The crystal structure and phase of a MnFe-LDH nanostructure are determined by an X-ray diffraction study; Figure 4a presents the XRD patterns of the MnFe-LDH structure of the MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h samples. The XRD patterns show a series of (00l) reflections characteristic of layered structures, affirming the LDH structure of MnFe-LDH. The peaks correspond to the (003), (006), and (009) planes of the MnFe-LDH structure, which again confirms the formation of the MnFe-layered structure. The nature of XRD peaks is broad, indicating a nanocrystallinity of the MnFe-LDH structure. Similar peaks were obtained for MnFe-LDH elsewhere [20,24]. Apart from the peaks due to MnFe-LDH, there are sharp peaks at 44°, 52°, and 76°, which are assigned to the Ni foam substrate, denoted by “∆”. In addition, some peaks are detected, ascribed to the precursors used for the preparation of the electrodes [18].

4.3. XPS

The XPS of MnFe-LDH mainly involve Mn, Fe, and O components, as depicted in Figure 4b–d. The high-resolution Mn 2p core level spectrum (Figure 4b) consists of two characteristic peaks located at the binding energies of 654.17 and 642.71 eV that are associated with the Mn 2p1/2 and Mn 2p3/2, respectively. For Fe 2p (Figure 4c), the peak centered at 711.90 eV belongs to Fe 2p3/2, whereas the peak located at 723.45 eV corresponds to Fe 2p1/2, which is consistent with the previously reported literature, indicating the formation of MnFe-LDH [25]. In Figure 4d, for the O 1s spectra, the peaks centered at the binding energies of 529.63, 530.99, and 531.43 eV are associated with the metal–oxygen (M-O), i.e., oxygen in the form of bound hydroxide groups (OH), which signifies the formation of M-OH (M = Mn or Fe) and surface contamination, respectively [7].

4.4. Electrochemical Study

The electrochemical behavior of the MnFe-LDH nanostructured electrodes grown at different hydrothermal reaction times was studied by measuring the CV and GCD curves using a conventional three-electrode system. The CV curves of MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h recorded in the potential window of −0.1 to +0.5 versus SCE at 5 mVs−1 are as shown in Figure 5a. The pair of redox peaks observed for all three electrodes (MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h) suggests the faradaic charge storage behavior of MnFe-LDH. It was observed that the area under the curve and, hence, the current from the CV curve varied with respect to the hydrothermal reaction time, as a clear modification is seen from the FESEM images (Figure 2). With the increase in hydrothermal reaction time from 9 h to 12 h, the area under the CV curve increases and the surface morphology changes from nanoparticles with few nanosheets to the uniform and well-organized nanosheets, providing more accessible reaction sites to the electrolyte ions. After further increasing the hydrothermal reaction time from 12 h to 24 h, the observed decrease in the CV current may be due to the formation of large leaf-like nanostructures covering the active materials, which then resulted in difficult access for the electrolyte ions. According to the previous literature, the shape of the CV curves obtained for MnFe-LDH electrodes defines the battery-type behavior of the synthesized electrodes; it is thus necessary to also discuss the areal capacitance in terms of areal capacities [26,27,28]. The areal capacitance values (capacities) calculated from the CV curves at 5 mVs−1 for MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h were 1196 mFcm−2 (717 mCcm−2), 2013 mFcm−2 (1208 mCcm−2), and 1802 mFcm−2 (1081 mCcm−2), respectively.
The CV curves of the MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h electrodes recorded with varying scan rates from 5 to 100 mVs−1, in a potential window of −0.1 to +0.5 V versus SCE, are presented in Figure 6a–c. Figure 6d demonstrates the areal capacitance obtained for MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h at different scan rates. The highest areal capacitance (capacities) of 1196 mFcm−2 (717 mCcm−2), 2013 mFcm−2 (1208 mCcm−2), and 1802 mFcm−2 (1081 mCcm−2) was achieved at 5mVs−1, whereas the values of 310 mFcm−2 (186 mCcm−2), 679 mFcm−2 (407 mCcm−2), and 474 mFcm−2 (284 mCcm−2) for areal capacitance (capacities) were obtained even at a high scan rate of 100 mVs−1 for MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h, respectively. This decrease in capacitance with increasing scan rates is due to the difficulty of diffusing electrolyte ions into the electrodes’ internal structure and pores and, hence, the ineffective interaction between electrode and electrolyte occurs.
Figure 5b displays the GCD curves of the nanoparticles of all MnFe-LDH electrodes. An analogous observation of the electrochemical behavior compared to CV of the electrodes is seen from the GCD measurements. The deviation in triangular shape of the GCD curves for all electrodes was observed, again indicating the charging/discharging process was accompanied by electrochemical oxidation/reduction reactions of MnFe-LDH.
From the GCD curves, the maximum areal capacitance (capacities) of 956 mFcm−2 (525 mCcm−2), 1886 mFcm−2 (1037 mCcm−2), and 1623 mFcm−2 (893 mCcm−2) was achieved at an applied current of 25 mA, for MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h, respectively. The GCD curves measured at different the applied currents of 25, 30, 35, and 40 mA for the MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h electrodes are as presented in Figure 7a–c. Figure 7d represents the obtained areal capacitance at different applied currents for MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h. From the above electrochemical studies, it was found that the MnFe-12h electrode exhibits the maximum capacitance (capacity) from the CV and GCD curves. A maximum areal energy density and a power density of 0.16 mW h cm−2 and 13.75 mW cm−2, respectively, at an applied current of 25 mA, were achieved.
All the above obtained results strongly proved the conclusion that the MnFe-LDH’s morphological features play a significant role in its electrochemical performance. Initially, for MnFe-9h, the aggregated nanoparticles limit the use of the electrochemically active sites. Likewise, at the maximum hydrothermal reaction time (MnFe-24h), the formation of large leaf-like nanostructures cover the electro-active sites, thus restricting the interaction between the electrolyte and active material. The uniform, thin, and well-organized nanosheets of MnFe-LDH represent an advantageous nanostructure that offers sufficient electrochemical active sites, improves the electrode–electrolyte interface, and hence boosts the redox reaction rate.
As shown in the Nyquist plots (Figure 5c), the MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h electrodes form a semicircle in the high-frequency region and an inclined straight line in the low-frequency region. The intersection with the X-axis towards very high frequency in the Nyquist plot estimates the equivalent series resistance (ESR). The radius of the semicircle can define the charge transfer resistance [5]. The ESR values (from Figure 5f) of the MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h electrodes are 0.50, 0.42, and 0.45 Ω, respectively. The radii of the semicircle for MnFe-9h is small (compared to MnFe-12h and MnFe-24h), whereas for the MnFe-12h and MnFe-24h electrodes it is nearly the same. These ESR and charge transfer resistance results suggest the satisfactory electrochemical performance of the MnFe-12h electrode.
To further evaluate the electrochemical performance of the MnFe-12h electrode in a real application, an asymmetrical cell device was assembled using activated carbon as a negative electrode and MnFe-12h as a positive electrode. The CVs of both the AC and MnFe-12h measured in a three-electrode configuration at a 10 mVs−1 scan rate are shown in Figure 8a. The working potentials of the AC and MnFe-12h electrodes were −1.0 to 0 V and −0.1 to 0.5 V versus SCE, respectively, which indicates that the operating cell voltage of the MnFe-12h//AC can be 1.6 V. The mass deposited on both the conductors was determined using the charge matching method represented as Q+ = Q, where Q+ and Q are the positive and negative electrode charges, respectively [29]. Based on this, the mass loading on the positive electrode is 1.1 mg, whereas it is 2.1 mg on negative electrode, with a mass ratio of 0.52. To determine the operating voltage window, the CV curves of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device were measured with an increasing voltage window (from 0–0.3 to 0–1.7 V) as illustrated in Figure 8b. When increasing the voltage to 1.7 V, some discrete redox peaks were seen, designating deeper redox reactions on the surface of the MnFe-LDH nanosheets. From this, the appropriate voltage window of 0–1.6 V was achieved for the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device; beyond this value, polarization becomes visible. Figure 8c shows the CV curves of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device recorded at scan rates from 10 mVs−1 to 100 mVs−1 within the optimized voltage window of 0 to 1.6 V. The areal capacitance (capacities) of the MnFe-LDH nanosheets increased from 226 mFcm−2 (68 mCcm−2) with a voltage window of 0–0.3 V to 3915 mFcm−2 (6264 mCcm−2) with a voltage window of 0–1.6 V, at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 for the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device. A maximum areal capacitance (capacities) of 3915 mFcm−2 (6264 mCcm−2) at 10 mVs−1 was achieved, whereas 1354 mFcm−2 (2166 mCcm−2), even at a high scan rate 100 mVs−1, was achieved from the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device.
The GCD curves of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell also recorded with different applied voltage windows (from 0–0.3 to 0–1.6 V) are presented in Figure 8d. This figure displays the GCD curves of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device measured at applied currents from 10 mA to 30 mA. Little variation in the triangular shape of the GCD curves again represents the occurrence of redox reactions on the surface of the MnFe-LDH nanosheets. The MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device delivers a maximum areal capacitance (capacity) of 506 mFcm−2 (809 mCcm−2), with an energy density of 44.9 µW h cm−2, and a power density of 16 mW cm−2 at an applied current of 10 mA, within the 1.6 V operating voltage window.
The specific energy and power densities of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device obtained at different applied currents are shown in the Ragone plot in Figure 9a. The MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device delivers a maximum specific energy density of 55.01 W h kg−1, with a power density of 5000 W kg−1 at an applied current of 10 mA, within the 1.6 V operating voltage window. The specific energy density and power density values attained in the present study for the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device are higher than those of previously reported studies for an LDH-based asymmetric cell device, which are depicted in the Ragone plot (Figure 9a) [23,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. To assess the electrochemical stability, the long-term performance of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device was investigated by CV measurements for 5000 cycles at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1. Figure 9b presents the effect on capacitance retention and areal capacitance of the MnFe-12h//AC device with increasing electrochemical cycle numbers. The inset of Figure 9b presents the CV recorded for the 1st and 5001st electrochemical cycles for the MnFe-12h//AC device at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1. The small variation in the CV curve was observed after performing 5000 cycles, suggesting the slight change in electrochemical performance after performing 5000 cycles. The MnFe-12h//AC cell device exhibited a capacitance retention of approximately 93%, with an areal capacitance of approximately 3641 mFcm−2, after 5000 cycles, suggesting an excellent and stable electrochemical performance.
The typical Nyquist plots for the AC//MnFe-12h asymmetric cell device before and after performing 5000 cycles are presented in Figure 8f. These Nyquist plots again designate the semicircle toward the high-frequency region and the vertical straight line in the low-frequency region, further suggesting the ideal supercapacitor behavior of the AC//MnFe-12h asymmetric cell device. The inset of Figure 8f shows the magnified view of the Nyquist plots, denoting the low ESR values, namely 0.26 and 0.28 Ω before and after performing 5000 cycles, respectively. There was a small distinction perceived in the Nyquist plots with a very small change in ESR values (0.02 Ω) for the AC//MnFe-12h asymmetric cell device after performing 5000 electrochemical cycles, indicating the good stability of the assembled cell device.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, we modified the morphological features of MnFe-LDH using the hydrothermal method and examined in detail its supercapacitive electrochemical performance. Our results reveal that the uniform and well-organized MnFe-LDH nanosheets obtained after the 12 h hydrothermal reaction time afford several active electrochemical sites, effective access to the electrolyte ions, and a minimum resistance path, boosting the electrochemical redox reactions and, hence, enhancing the electrochemical properties. The MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device delivers a maximum capacitance of 506 mFcm−2, with an energy density of 44.9 µW h cm−2 (55.01 W h kg−1) and a power density of 16 mW cm−2 (5000 W kg−1) at an applied current of 10 mA, (with 93% capacitance retention after performing 5000 cycles, at 10 mVs−1) within the 1.6 V operating voltage window. These encouraging electrochemical characteristics of MnFe-LDH nanosheets offer its feasible use as an electrode material for an efficient energy storage device.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S.P.; methodology, D.S.P.; software, D.S.P.; formal analysis, D.S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.P. and S.A.P.; writing—review and editing, S.A.P.; supervision, J.C.S.; project administration, J.C.S. and H.J.K.; funding acquisition, J.C.S and H.J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1A2C1015206, NRF-2019M3F5A1A01077146, and NRF-2017M1A2A2048904).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, K.S.; Choudhary, N.; Jung, Y.; Thomas, J. Recent Advances in Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials for Supercapacitor Electrode Applications. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 482–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, F.; Wu, X.; Yuan, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, Y.; Huang, W. Latest advances in supercapacitors: From new electrode materials to novel device designs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6816–6854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Majumdar, D.; Maiyalagan, T.; Jiang, Z. Recent Progress in Ruthenium Oxide-Based Composites for Supercapacitor Applications. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 4343–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, S.; Saeed, G.; Zhu, L.; Hui, K.N.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. 0D to 3D carbon-based networks combined with pseudocapacitive electrode material for high energy density supercapacitor: A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 126352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patil, D.S.; Pawar, S.A.; Shin, J.C. Core-shell structure of Co3O4@CdS for high performance electrochemical supercapacitor. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.; Du, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, W.; Xue, Q.; Yan, Z. Layered double hydroxides toward high-performance supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 15460–15485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Patil, D.S.; Pawar, S.A.; Shin, J.C.; Kim, H.J. Layered double hydroxide based on ZnCo@NiCo-nano-architecture on 3D graphene scaffold as an efficient pseudocapacitor. J. Power Sources 2019, 435, 226812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, T.; Zhang, S.; Yan, X.; Lyu, M.; Wang, L.; Bell, J.; Wang, H. 2-Methylimidazole-Derived Ni-Co Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets as High Rate Capability and High Energy Density Storage Material in Hybrid Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 15510–15524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Lee, P.S. Sulfidation of NiMn-Layered Double Hydroxides/Graphene Oxide Composites toward Supercapacitor Electrodes with Enhanced Performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1501745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, M.; Yao, Y.; Wen, J.; Long, L.; Kong, M.; Zhang, G.; Liao, X.; Yin, G.; Huang, Z. Construction of a Hierarchical NiCo2S4 @PPy Core–Shell Heterostructure Nanotube Array on Ni Foam for a High-Performance Asymmetric Supercapacitor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 24525–24535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, S.; Lee, S.C.; Patil, U.; Shackery, I.; Kang, S.; Zhang, K.; Park, J.H.; Chung, K.Y.; Jun, S.C. Hierarchical MnCo-layered double hydroxides@Ni(OH)2 core–shell heterostructures as advanced electrodes for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 1043–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, H.; Wu, F.; Fang, L.; Hu, J.; Luo, H.; Guan, T.; Hu, B.S.; Zhou, M. Layered NiFe-LDH/MXene nanocomposite electrode for high-performance supercapacitor. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 13080–13089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bagavathi, M.; Dinesh, B.; Saraswathi, R. A Facile One-Step Electrophoretic Deposition of Co−Ni-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets for a High Performance Supercapacitor. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 8799–8806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tyagi, A.; Joshi, M.C.; Shah, A.; Thakur, V.K.; Gupta, R.K. Hydrothermally Tailored Three-Dimensional Ni-V Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets as High-Performance Hybrid Supercapacitor Applications. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 3257–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Li, M.; Addad, A.; Dolci, M.; Roussel, P.; Naushad, M.; Szunerits, S.; Boukherroub, R. NiMnCr layered double hydroxide-carbon spheres modified Ni foam: An efficient positive electrode for hybrid supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 396, 125370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Wu, H.; Guan, C.; Elshahawy, A.M.; Dong, Y.; Pennycook, S.J.; Wang, J. (Ni,Co)Se2 /NiCo-LDH Core/Shell Structural Electrode with the Cactus-Like (Ni,Co)Se2 Core for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Small 2018, 15, 1803895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Patil, D.S.; Pawar, S.A.; Lee, S.H.; Shin, J.C. CoFe layered double hydroxide for enhanced electrochemical performance. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 862, 114012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patil, D.S.; Pawar, S.A.; Ryu, J.; Shin, J.C.; Kim, H.J. Morphological evolution and electrochemical cycling for enhanced electrochemical activity of MnCo-layered double hydroxide. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 331, 135378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kurtan, U.; Dursun, D.; Aydın, H.; Toprak, M.S.; Baykal, A.; Bozkurt, A. Influence of calcination rate on morphologies and magnetic properties of MnFe2O4 nanofibers. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18189–18195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, G.; Zhang, K.L.; Chen, S.; Li, S.H.; Wang, L.L.; Wang, L.P.; Liu, R.; Gao, J.; Yang, H.H. Manganese-iron layered double hydroxide: A theranostic nanoplatform with pH-responsive MRI contrast enhancement and drug release. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 3629–3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ruan, Y.; Jia, X.; Wang, C.; Zhen, W.; Jiang, X. Mn-Fe layered double hydroxide nanosheets: A new photothermal nanocarrier for O2-evolving phototherapy. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 11729–11732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shi, M.; Narayanasamy, M.; Yang, C.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, J.; Angaiah, S.; Yan, C. 3D interpenetrating assembly of partially oxidized MXene confined Mn–Fe bimetallic oxide for superior energy storage in ionic liquid. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 334, 135546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shao, M.; Zhang, R.; Li, Z.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Layered double hydroxides toward electrochemical energy storage and conversion: Design, synthesis and applications. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 15880–15893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lu, Z.; Qian, L.; Tian, Y.; Li, Y.; Sun, X.; Duan, X. Ternary NiFeMn layered double hydroxides as highly-efficient oxygen evolution catalysts. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 908–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hou, L.; Li, X.; Yang, Q.; Chen, F.; Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Huang, X.; Wang, D. Heterogeneous activation of peroxymonosulfate using Mn-Fe layered double hydroxide: Performance and mechanism for organic pollutant degradation. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 663, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Conway, B.E. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications; Kluwer Academic Publishers/Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999; Available online: https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zCblBwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=B+E+Conway&ots=b9lCfg_usx&sig=MwK895IibsqdxTgvTnDx38qntuU#v=onepage&q=B E Conway&f=false (accessed on 15 October 2018).
  27. Brousse, T.; Bélanger, D.; Long, J.W. To Be or Not To Be Pseudocapacitive? J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A5185–A5189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Pawar, S.A.; Patil, D.S.; Shin, J.C. Electrochemical battery-type supercapacitor based on chemosynthesized Cu2S-Ag2S composite electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 259, 664–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shao, Y.; El-Kady, M.F.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, M.; Wang, H.; Dunn, B.; Kaner, R.B. Design and Mechanisms of Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 9233–9280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jin, H.; Yuan, D.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, J. Ni-Co layered double hydroxide on carbon nanorods and graphene nanoribbons derived from MOFs for supercapacitors. Dalt. Trans. 2018, 47, 8706–8715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yuan, Y.; Li, Z.; Shi, Z.; Zhu, J. A facile way to grow NiMn-LDH sheets on KCu7S4 nanowires with synergistic effects for applications in hybrid supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 825, 154056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jing, C.; Liu, X.; Yao, H.; Yan, P.; Zhao, G.; Bai, X.; Dong, B.; Dong, F.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y. Phase and morphology evolution of CoAl LDH nanosheets towards advanced supercapacitor applications. CrystEngComm 2019, 21, 4934–4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liang, H.; Lin, J.; Jia, H.; Chen, S.; Qi, J.; Cao, J.; Lin, T.; Fei, W.; Feng, J. Hierarchical NiCo-LDH/NiCoP@NiMn-LDH hybrid electrodes on carbon cloth for excellent supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 15040–15046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, L.; Shi, N.; Liu, Q.; Wang, J.; Yang, B.; Wang, B.; Yan, H.; Sun, Y.; Jing, X. Facile synthesis of exfoliated Co-Al LDH-carbon nanotube composites with high performance as supercapacitor electrodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 17936–17942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhu, Y.; Zong, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, H.; Du, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhan, J.; Wang, H. Ultra-long lifespan asymmetrical hybrid supercapacitor device based on hierarchical NiCoP@C@LDHs electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 334, 135589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, D.; He, Z.; Wang, C.; Guo, L.; Ma, J. Co-ZIF derived porous NiCo-LDH nanosheets/N doped carbon foam for high-performance supercapacitor. Carbon 2020, 165, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, Q.; Yao, K.; Zhang, Y. MnO2-directed synthesis of NiFe-LDH@FeOOH nanosheeet arrays for supercapacitor negative electrode. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qiu, H.; Sun, X.; An, S.; Lan, D.; Cui, J.; Zhang, Y.; He, W. Microwave synthesis of histidine-functionalized graphene quantum dots/Ni-Co LDH with flower ball structure for supercapacitor. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 567, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tahir, M.U.; Arshad, H.; Xie, W.; Wang, X.; Nawaz, M.; Yang, C.; Su, X. Synthesis of morphology controlled NiCo-LDH microflowers derived from ZIF-67 using binary additives and their excellent asymmetric supercapacitor properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 529, 147073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustrations of the (a) stepwise growth process of MnFe hydroxide nanostructures controlled by the hydrothermal reaction time. (b) Fabrication of the asymmetric cell device.
Figure 1. Schematic illustrations of the (a) stepwise growth process of MnFe hydroxide nanostructures controlled by the hydrothermal reaction time. (b) Fabrication of the asymmetric cell device.
Energies 13 04616 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of MnFe-9 (ad), CoFe-12 (eh), and CoFe-24 (il) at different magnifications.
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of MnFe-9 (ad), CoFe-12 (eh), and CoFe-24 (il) at different magnifications.
Energies 13 04616 g002
Figure 3. EDS element mapping of the MnFe-LDH electron image (a), manganese (b), iron (c), and oxygen (d).
Figure 3. EDS element mapping of the MnFe-LDH electron image (a), manganese (b), iron (c), and oxygen (d).
Energies 13 04616 g003
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns of MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h. High resolution spectra of MnFe-12, (b) Mn 2p, (c) Fe 2p, and (d) O 1s.
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns of MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h. High resolution spectra of MnFe-12, (b) Mn 2p, (c) Fe 2p, and (d) O 1s.
Energies 13 04616 g004
Figure 5. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h, at a scan rate of 5 mVs−1, (b) charge–discharge at an applied current of 25 mA, (c) Nyquist plots, and (d) magnified Nyquist plots of the MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h electrodes.
Figure 5. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h, at a scan rate of 5 mVs−1, (b) charge–discharge at an applied current of 25 mA, (c) Nyquist plots, and (d) magnified Nyquist plots of the MnFe-9h, MnFe-12h, and MnFe-24h electrodes.
Energies 13 04616 g005
Figure 6. CV curves of (a) MnFe-9h, (b) MnFe-12h, and (c) MnFe-24h, recorded at different scan rates. (d) Variation of areal capacitance with respect to scan rate.
Figure 6. CV curves of (a) MnFe-9h, (b) MnFe-12h, and (c) MnFe-24h, recorded at different scan rates. (d) Variation of areal capacitance with respect to scan rate.
Energies 13 04616 g006
Figure 7. Galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) curves of (a) MnFe-9h, (b) MnFe-12h, and (c) MnFe-24h, recorded at different applied currents. (d) Variation of areal capacitance with respect to applied current.
Figure 7. Galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) curves of (a) MnFe-9h, (b) MnFe-12h, and (c) MnFe-24h, recorded at different applied currents. (d) Variation of areal capacitance with respect to applied current.
Energies 13 04616 g007
Figure 8. (a) CV curves of activated carbon and MnFe-12h electrodes at 10 mVs−1. Electrochemical measurements of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device; (b) CV and (d) GCD curves at different voltage windows at 10 mVs−1 and 10 mA, respectively. (c) CV and (e) GCD curves at different scan rates and applied currents, respectively. (f) Nyquist plot; inset: magnified view of the Nyquist plot.
Figure 8. (a) CV curves of activated carbon and MnFe-12h electrodes at 10 mVs−1. Electrochemical measurements of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device; (b) CV and (d) GCD curves at different voltage windows at 10 mVs−1 and 10 mA, respectively. (c) CV and (e) GCD curves at different scan rates and applied currents, respectively. (f) Nyquist plot; inset: magnified view of the Nyquist plot.
Energies 13 04616 g008
Figure 9. (a) Ragone plot, for the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device. (b) Cycling performance of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device measured at 10 mVs−1. Inset: CV curves obtained for 1st cycle and 5001st cycles at 10 mVs−1.
Figure 9. (a) Ragone plot, for the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device. (b) Cycling performance of the MnFe-12h//AC asymmetric cell device measured at 10 mVs−1. Inset: CV curves obtained for 1st cycle and 5001st cycles at 10 mVs−1.
Energies 13 04616 g009aEnergies 13 04616 g009b

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patil, D.S.; Pawar, S.A.; Kim, H.J.; Shin, J.C. Hierarchical Manganese–Iron-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Energies 2020, 13, 4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184616

AMA Style

Patil DS, Pawar SA, Kim HJ, Shin JC. Hierarchical Manganese–Iron-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Energies. 2020; 13(18):4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184616

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patil, Dipali S., Sachin A. Pawar, Hyo Jin Kim, and Jae Cheol Shin. 2020. "Hierarchical Manganese–Iron-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets for Asymmetric Supercapacitors" Energies 13, no. 18: 4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184616

APA Style

Patil, D. S., Pawar, S. A., Kim, H. J., & Shin, J. C. (2020). Hierarchical Manganese–Iron-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Energies, 13(18), 4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184616

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop