Virtual Airport Hub—A New Business Model to Reduce GHG Emissions in Continental Air Transport
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background
2.1. Passenger Air Traffic
2.2. Green Deal and Sustainable Finance Action Plan
2.3. Digital Economy and New Business Models
3. Methodology
- Insofar as the use of direct flights replacing connecting flights with a transfer at the hub contributes to shortening the distance on which the air travel takes place (absolute values in km and relative values in percentage).
- Insofar as the use of direct flights replacing connecting flights with a transfer at the hub contributes to the reduction of energy consumption necessary for propulsion of the plane, in particular due to the avoidance of the re-acceleration, take-off, and re-ascend phases (absolute values in kg of fuel mass per passenger and relative values in percentage).
- Insofar as the use of direct flights replacing connecting flights with a transfer at the hub contributes to the reduction of GHG emissions (absolute values in kg of CO2 mass per passenger and relative values in percentage).
4. New Business Model: Virtual Airport Hub (VAH)
4.1. The Requirement to Reduce Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions
4.2. Assumptions of the Operation of the VAH
- reducing energy consumption in transport, measured in absolute and relative values, and thus reduction in pollution and GHG emissions in air transport,
- increasing the quality of customer service by reducing the time of their multisegmented multimodal journey along the entire “door-to-door” route due to the network’s better adjustment of air transport services offered to the needs of passengers and shortening the route by land transport to the airport on the first section of the journey and shortening the route of pick-up from the airport by land transport on the last section of the journey,
- increasing the resilience of the aviation sector to the occurrence of unexpected disturbances, e.g., related to the outbreak of a pandemic, thanks to the decentralization of travel flows and the limitation of transit traffic at communication hubs.
- no fixed flight schedule within the continent,
- the use of data on the needs of travelers and the staff and equipment potential of carriers and the potential of airports to determine the network of air connections conducted in the next day,
- the avoidance of situations in which the offer for the passenger provides for the use of flights connected at transfer hubs.
4.3. Spatial Dispersion of the Offer and Organizational Decentralization in the Aviation Sector—The Market in Europe and the Market in Germany in 2019
4.4. Nonsustainability of Regional Air Traffic—Interregional Analysis (Case Study)
4.5. The Potential Shape of the Connection Network in the VAH Business Model—Estimate for Europe by the Size of the Passenger Flow in 2019
- In 2019, around 1 billion passengers were served at airports in Europe.
- Within 2022 and 2025, air traffic in Europe may return to the level of 2019.
- Since each passenger was registered at least twice at the airports (at the airport where he/she started the flight and at the airport where he/she ended the flight), there are at least 500 million of these passengers annually.
- If 10% of this group used connecting flights at transfer hubs while traveling within the continent (and other passengers using the hubs transferred to intercontinental flights), then their stay at the airport was registered not twice but four times (or more if they transferred more than once). The abovementioned number of 500 million travelers should therefore be reduced by 50 million people who would stop using transfers when traveling within the continent.
- If 450 million people traveled in a year, the average daily passenger flow is around 1,230,000 people.
- If we assume that there are 609 airports in operation with regular air traffic in Europe—Appendix B presents a list of the number of such airports in individual countries, but the new VAH business model would use the potential of approximately 100 airports, then at one airport, the daily flow would amount to 12,300 people on average. This is the number of people who would depart from a given airport on a direct flight (and the same average number would arrive at that airport).
- With the use of B737 or A320/321 aircraft, on average approximately 70 aircraft could depart (and arrive) daily, almost fully utilized with 180 seats on board, which means a take-off and landing operation almost every 8 min during 18 h of the operation of airspace during the day. This means that in the VAH business model, it is possible to offer a network of connections ensuring direct travel from any region (where the airport is located) to approximately 70 destinations within the continent. These are average values.
5. Reduction in Energy Consumption and Reduction in GHG Emissions after the Implementation of the VAH Business Model in Europe—Estimation
6. Conclusions and Implications
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix B
Country | EU | Non EU | Country | EU | Non EU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albania | 1 | Luxembourg | 1 | ||
Austria | 7 | Malta | 1 | ||
Belarus | 6 | Moldova | 2 | ||
Belgium | 7 | Montenegro | 2 | ||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 4 | Netherlands | 6 | ||
Bulgaria | 7 | North Macedonia | 2 | ||
Croatia | 9 | Norway | 48 | ||
Cyprus | 4 | Poland | 13 | ||
Czech Republic | 5 | Portugal | 13 | ||
Denmark | 10 | Romania | 13 | ||
Estonia | 5 | Russia (European part only) | 94 | ||
Finland | 19 | Serbia | 2 | ||
France | 53 | Slovakia | 3 | ||
Germany | 29 | Slovenia | 2 | ||
Greece (international only) | 17 | Spain | 36 | ||
Hungary | 5 | Sweden | 36 | ||
Iceland | 13 | Switzerland | 3 | ||
Republic of Ireland | 6 | Turkey (entire country) | 36 | ||
Italy | 46 | Ukraine | 10 | ||
Kosovo | 1 | United Kingdom | 26 | ||
Latvia | 2 | ||||
Lithuania | 4 | Subtotal | 359 | 250 |
References
- Destination 2050—A Route to Net Zero European Aviation. 2020. Available online: https://www.atn.aero/#/analysis.html?id=2076 (accessed on 17 March 2020).
- Agnusdei, G.P.; Elia, V.; Gnoni, M.G. Is Digital Twin Technology Supporting Safety Management? A Bibliometric and Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsamhi, S.H.; Ma, O.; Ansari, M.S.; Gupta, S.K. Collaboration of Drone and Internet of Public Safety Things in Smart Cities: An Overview of QoS and Network Performance Optimization. Drones 2019, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jacoby, M.; Usländer, T. Digital Twin and Internet of Things—Current Standards Landscape. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy—Putting European Transport on Track for the Future; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Volume 789. [Google Scholar]
- Kinelski, G. Competitiveness and Efficiency Management through Cognitive Technologies in the Digital Economy; Wydawnictwo Adam Marszalek: Torun, Poland, 2019; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
- How to Measure Freight Data Analytics Value and Why Backtesting Proves It. White Paper. FreightWaves Sonar. 2021. Available online: https://f.hubspotusercontent20.net/hubfs/5078273/How%20to%20measure%20freight%20data%20analytics%20value%20and%20why%20backtesting%20proves%20it.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2021).
- Amit, R.; Zott, C. Business Model Innovation: Creating Value in Times of Change; Working Paper WP-870; IESE Business School—University of Navarra: Barcelona, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Worldbank. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.AIR.PSGR (accessed on 12 March 2021).
- Eurostat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Air_transport_statistics#Progressive_growth_in_air_transport_of_passengers_in_the_course_of_2019 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
- IATA. 2020 Worst Year in History for Air Travel Demand. 2021. Available online: www.iata.org (accessed on 8 March 2021).
- Bouwer, J.; Krishnan, V.; Saxon, S. Will Airline Hubs Recover from COVID-19? McKinsey&Company: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- UNWTO. Global Report on Aviation; UNWTO: Madrid, Spain, 2012; pp. 31–32. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, A. An Analysis of Fortress Hubs in Airline Networks. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 1996, 30, 293–307. [Google Scholar]
- Koenen, J. Lufthansa kündigt langjährige Partnerschaft mit Condor. Handelsblatt. 4 December 2020. Available online: https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/handel-konsumgueter/tourismusbranche-lufthansa-kuendigt-langjaehrige-partnerschaft-mit-condor-/26687666.html (accessed on 4 December 2020).
- Schiltknecht, J.-P. Direktflüge statt Hub-Strategie: So könnte die Pandemie den künftigen Flugverkehrverändern. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. 28 December 2020. Available online: www.nzz.ch (accessed on 28 December 2020).
- Meadows, D.H.; Meadows, D.L.; Randers, J.; Behrens, W.W., III. The Limits to Growth; Universe Books: New York, NY, USA, 1972; p. 205. [Google Scholar]
- Paris Agreement. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2021).
- Abate, M.; Christidis, P.; Purwanto, A.J. Government support to airlines in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 2020, 89, 101931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Commission. Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; Volume 97. [Google Scholar]
- Busch, D. Sustainable Finance Disclosure in the EU Financial Sector; EBI Working Paper Series n. 70; European Banking Institute: Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Foss, N.J.; Saebi, T. Business model and business model innovation: Between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Plan. 2018, 51, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cusumano, A.M.; Gawer, A.; Yoffie, D.B. The Business of Platforms. Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power; HarperCollins Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2018; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. A European Strategy for Data; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Volume 66. [Google Scholar]
- Wensveen, J.G. Air Transportation. A Management Perspective; Ashgate Publishing Limited: Farnham, UK, 2015; p. 413. [Google Scholar]
- EFT. The Changing Face of Collaboration. 2017. Available online: http://1.eft.com/LP=16239?utm_campaign=4765%2028FEB17%20BD&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua&elqTrackId=d55b17cbd55f450f85e146c98903cd22&elq=8f799d10a17a4a708380dfc2630e8451&elqaid=25910&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=12031 (accessed on 28 February 2017).
- Lashinksy, A. Wild Ride. Inside Uber’s Quest for World Domination; Penguin Random House: New York, NY, USA, 2017; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
- Fridgeirsson, T.V.; Ingason, H.T.; Jonasson, H.I.; Jonsdottir, H. An Authoritative Study on the Near Future Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Project Management Knowledge Areas. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bram, U.; Schmalz, M. The Business of Big Data. How to Create Lasting Value in the Age of AI; Capara Books: London, UK, 2019; p. 53. [Google Scholar]
- Kovács, Z.; Vida, G.; Elekes, Á.; Kovalcsik, T. Combining Social Media and Mobile Positioning Data in the Analysis of Tourist Flows: A Case Study from Szeged, Hungary. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Currie, W.L. Institutional theory of information technology. In The Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems; Galliers, R.D., Currie, W.L., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; p. 137. [Google Scholar]
- Vukotic, V. Quantum Economics. Panoeconomicus 2011, 58, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indset, A. How the Q Economy Will Change Our World for the Better. Available online: https://www.businessphilosopher.com/2019/03/30/q-economy-will-change-world-better/ (accessed on 25 February 2020).
- Indset, A. The Quantum Economy: Saving the Mensch with Humanistic Capitalism; Ullstein Buchverlag: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Barber, W.W.; Ojala, A. Change of international business models during COVID-19. In COVID-19 and International Business. Change of Era; Marinov, M.A., Marinova, S.T., Eds.; Routlege: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 101–112. [Google Scholar]
- Sheffi, Y. The New (Ab)Normal. Reshaping Business and Supply Chain Strategy beyond Covid-19; MIT CTL Media: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Jadoul, Q.; Róna, D.; Storozhev, A.; Sukharevsky, A. The Five Core IT Shifts of Scaled Agile Organizations; McKinsey&Company: Brussels, Belgium, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Mannino, A.; Dejaco, M.C.; Re Cecconi, F. Building Information Modelling and Internet of Things Integration for Facility Management—Literature Review and Future Needs. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, A. Contract Freight Rates vs. Spot Rates: A Tech-Driven Guide. 2021. Available online: https://sonar-freightwaves-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/sonar.freightwaves.com/freight-market-blog/contract-freight-rates-vs-spot-rates-a-tech-driven-guide/amp (accessed on 14 January 2021).
- Vílchez, V.F.; Aragón-Correa, J.A. A European approach of environmental costs: A case study in the Spanish road freight transport industry. In Handbook of Sustainability Management; Madu, C.N., Kuei, C.-H., Eds.; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 625–632. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, D.; Földes, D.; Csiszár, C. Autonomous Vehicle Use and Urban Space Transformation: A Scenario Building and Analysing Method. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3008. [Google Scholar]
- Oláh, J.; Aburumman, N.; Popp, J.; Khan, M.A.; Haddad, H.; Kitukutha, N. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKinnon, A.; Browne, M.; Whiteing, A.; Piecyk, M. (Eds.) Green Logistics: Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Logistics, 3rd ed.; Kogan Page: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Park, J.; Yang, B. GIS-Enabled Digital Twin System for Sustainable Evaluation of Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Jeonju City, South Korea. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez-Crisóstomo, A.; Rubio-Andrada, L.; Celemín-Pedroche, M.S.; Escat-Cortés, M. The Constrained Air Transport Energy Paradigm in 2021. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ZEROe—Towards the World’s First Zero-Emission Commercial Aircraft. Available online: https://www.airbus.com/innovation/zero-emission/hydrogen/zeroe.html (accessed on 11 March 2021).
- Spaeth, A. Mit dem Kapsel-Konzept nachhaltiger fliegen. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. 2021. Available online: www.nzz.ch (accessed on 19 February 2021).
- Anzahl der Flugsicherungsorganisationen im Flugverkehr in Europa und den USA im Jahr 2008. Statista. 2011. Available online: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/202700/umfrage/anzahl-der-flugsicherungsorganisationen-in-europa-und-den-usa (accessed on 14 March 2021).
- Air Transport Statistics; Eurostat: Luxembourg, 2020; p. 4.
- Beförderte Personenim Luftverkehr aus Deutschland nach Kontinenten, Statistisches Bundesamt, Bonn (Germany). 27 July 2020. Available online: www.destatis.de (accessed on 1 December 2020).
- Die Größten Flughäfen in Deutschland. Available online: https://www.laenderdaten.info/Europa/Deutschland/flughafen.php (accessed on 1 December 2020).
- ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator. Available online: https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Carbonoffset/Pages/default.aspx (accessed on 14 March 2021).
- Lewitowicz, J. Podstawy Eksploatacji Statków Powietrznych. Systemy Eksploatacji Statków Powietrznych; Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych: Warszawa, Poland, 2006; p. 137. [Google Scholar]
- Capacity Utilization in USA 2018; Federal Aviation Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. Available online: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/policy_guidance/benefit_cost/media/econ-value-section-3-capacity.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2021).
- IEA. Available online: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/world-air-passenger-traffic-evolution-1980–2020 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
Country | Partner Country | Passengers (1000) | Share of Intra EU-Traffic [%] | Subtotal Share of Intra EU-Traffic [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Germany | Spain | 28,949 | 8.5 | 20.1 |
Italy | 15,206 | 4.5 | ||
France | 8504 | 2.5 | ||
Greece | 8104 | 2.4 | ||
Austria | 7330 | 2.2 | ||
Spain | Germany | 28,949 | 8.5 | 20.4 |
Italy | 16,256 | 4.8 | ||
France | 15,265 | 4.5 | ||
Netherlands | 8769 | 2.6 | ||
France | Spain | 15,265 | 4.5 | 12.9 |
Italy | 12,452 | 3.7 | ||
Germany | 8504 | 2.5 | ||
Portugal | 7361 | 2.2 | ||
Three leading countries (DE, FR, ES) | Eight partner countries (DE, FR, ES, IT, GR, NL, PT, AU) | 128,196 | 38.0 |
Code IATA | Airport | Number of Destinations | Number of Carriers | Remarks | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FRA | Frankfurt/M | 239 | 100 | Hub of Star Alliance |
2 | MUC | Munich | 191 | 77 | Hub of Star Alliance |
3 | BER | Berlin Brandenburg | 170 | 97 | opened in 2020 |
4 | DUS | Duesseldorf | 147 | 57 | |
5 | CGN | Cologne | 92 | 26 | |
6 | HAM | Hamburg | 87 | 42 | |
7 | STR | Stuttgart | 80 | 30 | |
8 | HAJ | Hannover | 50 | 24 | |
9 | HHN | Hahn | 47 | 2 | |
10 | BRE | Bremen | 43 | 13 | |
11 | NRN | Weeze | 38 | 1 | |
12 | NUC | Nuremberg | 32 | 17 | |
13 | LEJ | Leipzig | 28 | 13 | |
14 | DTN | Dortmund | 28 | 11 | |
15 | FMM | Memmingen | 21 | 8 |
Airports | Region | Population | Passengers (Airports) | Air Mobility in the Region | Air Mobility in the Country | Relation of Regional and Country Air Mobility |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRK, KTC | NUTS PL 2 | 7,943,467 | 13,254,861 | 1.6686 | 1.2392 | 1.3465 |
VLC, ALC | NUTS ES 53 | 5,094,675 | 22,810,400 | 4.4773 | 4.8591 | 0.9214 |
AMS | NUTS NL 3 | 8,032,438 | 71,706,999 | 8.9272 | 4.7386 | 1.8839 |
EIN | NUTS NL 4 | 3,609,912 | 6,700,000 | 1.8560 | 0.3917 |
Direct Flight | Connecting Flight | Reduction Avoiding Connection Flight | |||||||||||
One way travel | distance [km] | Fuel consumption total [kg] | CO2 emissions total [kg] | CO2 emissions per pax [kg] | transit hub | distance [km] | Fuel consumption total [kg] | CO2 emissions total [kg] | CO2 emissions per pax [kg] | distance [%] | fuel consumption total [%] | CO2 emissions total [%] | CO2 emissions per pax [%] |
WAW—ALC | 2268 | 10,931.7 | 34,544.1 | 183.4 | FRA | 2387 | 11,161.4 | 35,270.0 | 251.9 | −5.0% | −2.1% | −2.1% | −27.2% |
WAW—FCO | 1324 | 6770.7 | 21,395.4 | 121.3 | FRA | 1849 | 9472.3 | 29,932.4 | 221.7 | −28.4% | −28.5% | −28.5% | −45.3% |
WAW—LIS | 2747 | 10,911.0 | 34,478.7 | 245.8 | BCN | 2859 | 13,522.2 | 42,730.1 | 275.6 | −3.9% | −19.3% | −19.3% | −10.8% |
CDG | 2810 | 12,924.4 | 40,841.1 | 291.7 | −2.2% | −15.6% | −15.6% | −15.7% | |||||
HEL—LHR | 1846 | 10,314.0 | 32,595.1 | 155.1 | CPH | 1867 | 10,121.6 | 31,984.3 | 213.2 | −1.1% | −1.9% | −1.9% | −27.3% |
FRA | 2190 | 11,222.6 | 35,463.4 | 236.4 | −15.7% | −8.1% | −8.1% | −34.4% | |||||
ATH—BCN | 1902 | 8620.8 | 27,241.7 | 164.0 | MUC | 1902 | 14,556.1 | 45,997.2 | 267.4 | 0.0% | −40.8% | −40.8% | −38.7% |
RIX—MXP | 1635 | 6990.6 | 22,090.3 | 164.3 | VIE | 1755 | 9433.1 | 29,808.6 | 200.1 | −6.8% | −25.9% | −25.9% | −17.9% |
STR—BCN | 995 | 5300.0 | 16,748.0 | 109.1 | FRA | 1247 | 7475.7 | 23,623.2 | 162.9 | −20.2% | −29.1% | −29.1% | −33.0% |
HAM—SOF | 1564 | 6930.0 | 21,898.8 | 135.3 | MUC | 1698 | 9397.5 | 29,696.1 | 194.1 | −7.9% | −26.3% | −26.3% | −30.3% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Paprocki, W. Virtual Airport Hub—A New Business Model to Reduce GHG Emissions in Continental Air Transport. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095076
Paprocki W. Virtual Airport Hub—A New Business Model to Reduce GHG Emissions in Continental Air Transport. Sustainability. 2021; 13(9):5076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095076
Chicago/Turabian StylePaprocki, Wojciech. 2021. "Virtual Airport Hub—A New Business Model to Reduce GHG Emissions in Continental Air Transport" Sustainability 13, no. 9: 5076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095076
APA StylePaprocki, W. (2021). Virtual Airport Hub—A New Business Model to Reduce GHG Emissions in Continental Air Transport. Sustainability, 13(9), 5076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095076