Next Article in Journal
An Experimental Study of the Morphological Evolution of Rills on Slopes under Rainfall Action
Previous Article in Journal
Are South Korea’s Environmental Policies Rational? An Analysis Focusing on Fine Dust Programs in the Seoul Metropolitan Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?

by
Xuemei Zhang
1,2,
Haodong Zheng
1,
Tao Hang
1 and
Qiang Meng
1,2,*
1
Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China
2
Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Logistics Planning and Modern Logistics Engineering, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6296; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156296
Submission received: 3 June 2024 / Revised: 4 July 2024 / Accepted: 20 July 2024 / Published: 23 July 2024

Abstract

Enterprises adopting a circular economy approach can effectively solve the severe situation of resources and the environment, and recycling is considered an effective means to solve environmental issues. Simultaneously, blockchain technology (BT) has been used to enhance product quality trust. However, there is limited literature on how to choose between monopolistic and competitive recycling modes by considering BT. This paper uses a game involving a manufacturer, a retailer, and a third-party recycler (TPR) in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC). The retailer can recycle on itself and compete with the TPR for recycling used products. The results show that BT adoption could increase the recycling rate and demand for remanufactured products. BT benefits the firms in the CLSC when they control usage costs, regardless of whether competitive recycling mode is used or not. In addition, whether BT is adopted or not, CLSC firms prefer competitive recycling mode only when the competitive intensity exceeds a specific threshold. Moreover, choosing an appropriate recycling mode can alleviate the negative impact of BT on the environment, then an all-win result can be obtained for CLSC firms, consumers, and society. These results can give suggestions for managers to optimize their supply chains regarding adopting BT and implementing recycling mode. In the future, we can expand our research on the transfer price of used products, the positive and negative effects of BT, and BT cost-sharing strategies.
Keywords: closed-loop supply chain; recycling mode; blockchain technology; competitive recycling closed-loop supply chain; recycling mode; blockchain technology; competitive recycling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Zheng, H.; Hang, T.; Meng, Q. How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology? Sustainability 2024, 16, 6296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156296

AMA Style

Zhang X, Zheng H, Hang T, Meng Q. How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology? Sustainability. 2024; 16(15):6296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xuemei, Haodong Zheng, Tao Hang, and Qiang Meng. 2024. "How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?" Sustainability 16, no. 15: 6296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop