Next Article in Journal
The Basis for Estimating Smartphone Lifespan: Identifying Factors That Affect In-Use Lifespan
Previous Article in Journal
“More than a Feeling”: How Eco-Anxiety Shapes Pro-Environmental Behaviors and the Role of Readiness to Change
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Modeling Sustainable Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Framework via Nonlinear Scalarization

1
Department of Applied Mathematics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania
2
“Costin C. Kiriţescu” National Institute of Economic Research, 050711 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 6157; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136157 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 May 2025 / Revised: 28 June 2025 / Accepted: 1 July 2025 / Published: 4 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)

Abstract

Sustainable economic decision making increasingly requires robust methodologies capable of withstanding deep uncertainty, particularly in volatile financial and resource-constrained environments. This paper introduces a unified optimization framework based on nonlinear scalarizing functionals, designed to support resilient planning under structural ambiguity. By integrating performance objectives with risk boundaries, the proposed model generalizes classical robustness paradigms—such as strict and reliable robustness—into a single tractable and economically interpretable formulation. A key innovation lies in translating scenario-based uncertainty into a directional performance index, aligned with stakeholder-defined sustainability criteria and encoded via a preference vector k. This scalarization approach supports behaviorally consistent and computationally efficient decision-making even in the absence of complete probabilistic information. A case study in multi-scenario portfolio allocation demonstrates the model’s capacity to maintain return stability while respecting predefined risk tolerances. Computational benchmarks confirm the framework’s scalability to larger problem instances, validating its practical applicability. Beyond financial applications, the model also holds promise for sustainable policy design, infrastructure planning, and resource allocation under deep uncertainty. This work contributes to bridging the gap between abstract optimization theory and applied sustainability challenges, offering a robust and adaptive decision-support tool for real-world implementation.
Keywords: robust optimization; nonlinear scalarization; sustainable economic decision-making; scenario-based planning; portfolio resilience; risk-constrained optimization; directional preferences; computational scalability robust optimization; nonlinear scalarization; sustainable economic decision-making; scenario-based planning; portfolio resilience; risk-constrained optimization; directional preferences; computational scalability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Șerban, F.; Dedu, S. Modeling Sustainable Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Framework via Nonlinear Scalarization. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136157

AMA Style

Șerban F, Dedu S. Modeling Sustainable Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Framework via Nonlinear Scalarization. Sustainability. 2025; 17(13):6157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136157

Chicago/Turabian Style

Șerban, Florentin, and Silvia Dedu. 2025. "Modeling Sustainable Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Framework via Nonlinear Scalarization" Sustainability 17, no. 13: 6157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136157

APA Style

Șerban, F., & Dedu, S. (2025). Modeling Sustainable Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Framework via Nonlinear Scalarization. Sustainability, 17(13), 6157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136157

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop