Next Article in Journal
Deciphering the Role of the Anaphylatoxin C3a: A Key Function in Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment
Previous Article in Journal
CT and MR Imaging of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Practical Guide for the Radiologist
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/cancers15112984
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Calprotectin in Patients with Rheumatic Immunomediated Adverse Effects Induced by Checkpoints Inhibitors

by
Beatriz Frade-Sosa
1,
Chafik Alejandro Chacur
1,
Josep M. Augé
2,
Andrés Ponce
1,
Juan C. Sarmiento-Monroy
1,
Ana Belén Azuaga
1,
Nuria Sapena
1,
Julio Ramírez
1,
Virginia Ruiz-Esquide
1,
Rosa Morlà
1,
Sandra Farietta
1,
Patricia Corzo
1,
Juan D. Cañete
1,
Raimon Sanmartí
1 and
José A. Gómez-Puerta
1,*
1
Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics (CDB), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(11), 2984; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112984
Submission received: 9 May 2023 / Revised: 28 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 30 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biomarkers)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The search for serum biomarkers of inflammatory activity in patients with immune-mediated diseases is an area of interest and has been the subject of multiple investigations in recent years. Calprotectin is a biomarker that can be used to identify inflammation and tissue damage and provide information on the extent and location of the damage. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the measurement of calprotectin levels is a sensitive biomarker for monitoring activity and a prognostic factor for the disease. It is well known that immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause immune-related adverse effects due to their mechanism of action. Rheumatic adverse effects have been reported and are increasingly recognized. Calprotectin determination may be useful in the evaluation of these patients and in monitoring disease activity. There are no reports of calprotectin in patients with immune-related rheumatic adverse effects.

Abstract

Background: this is an exploratory study to evaluate calprotectin serum levels in patients with rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. Methods: this is a retrospective observational study including patients with irAEs rheumatic syndromes. We compared the calprotectin levels to those in a control group of patients with RA and with a control group of healthy individuals. Additionally, we included a control group of patients treated with ICI but without irAEs to check calprotectin levels. We also analysed the performance of calprotectin for the identification of active rheumatic disease using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Results: 18 patients with rheumatic irAEs were compared to a control group of 128 RA patients and another group of 29 healthy donors. The mean calprotectin level in the irAE group was 5.15 μg/mL, which was higher than the levels in both the RA group (3.19 μg/mL) and the healthy group (3.81 μg/mL) (cut-off 2 μg/mL). Additionally, 8 oncology patients without irAEs were included. In this group, calprotectin levels were similar to those of the healthy controls. In patients with active inflammation, the calprotectin levels in the irAE group were significantly higher (8.43 μg/mL) compared to the RA group (3.94 μg/mL). ROC curve analysis showed that calprotectin had a very good discriminatory capacity to identify inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatic irAEs (AUC of 0.864). Conclusions: the results suggest that calprotectin may serve as a marker of inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatic irAEs induced by treatment with ICIs.

1. Introduction

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized oncologic treatment and has improved survival rates for patients with various types of cancer. There are several types of ICIs, including those that target cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway [1].
It is well known that ICIs can cause side effects; these are known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to their mechanism of action. Rheumatic irAEs, including ICI-induced arthritis [2,3,4,5,6], a clinical syndrome resembling polymyalgia rheumatica, myositis [7,8,9], fasciitis [10], vasculitis [11], and sarcoidosis-like [12] or systemic lupus erythematosus [13], among others, have been reported and are being recognized more frequently.
Calprotectin (S100A9/S100A8) is a heterodimeric complex, a member of the S100 protein family, which is released by cells of the innate immune system, such as neutrophils and monocytes, during inflammation; its levels in the blood can be measured to evaluate the presence and severity of inflammation. It has proinflammatory activities and acts as endogenous-associated molecular patterns via Toll-like receptor activation [14].
Studies have shown that calprotectin levels are minimal in blood and stool samples from healthy populations compared to patients with inflammatory disorders [15,16,17,18]. Calprotectin is a sensitive marker of inflammation in various conditions [19]. Increased calprotectin expression has also been found in patients with rheumatic diseases [20]. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, serum and plasma calprotectin levels are sensitive markers of inflammation [21,22] and have been associated with radiographic damage [23]. In addition, calprotectin can be a biomarker of clinical responses to antirheumatic drugs [24] and a predictive factor for disease relapse [25].
Based on this evidence, serum calprotectin determination has recently been routinely introduced in rheumatology clinical practice in our hospital as a new biomarker of inflammation [26]. In 2022, we conducted a preliminary study to assess the role of a new biomarker. We analysed all calprotectin tests conducted in our hospital in the previous year and found 2655 tests with a mean result of 2.8 ± 3.1 µg/mL. Of these, 48 (1.8%) showed elevated levels (≥8.9 µg/mL, more than 2 standard deviations of the cut-off (2 µg/mL)) and corresponded to 33 patients. Of these patients, 60% had RA, while others had conditions such as spondylarthritis (n = 3), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 2), palindromic rheumatism (n = 2), systemic sclerosis (n = 1), and adult Still’s disease (n = 1). Moreover, 2 patients (6%) had rheumatic irAEs due to immunotherapy. None of the patients had active infections at the time of testing.
We have previously described the different clinical patterns of rheumatic irAEs and their rheumatic and oncologic outcomes [6] and noted that ICI-induced arthritis patients present inflammatory patterns on imaging studies similar to conventional inflammatory arthritis [9]. There are no reports exploring the role of serum calprotectin in patients with rheumatic irAEs. This exploratory study aimed to evaluate serum calprotectin levels in a group of patients with rheumatic irAEs focused on patients with induced inflammatory arthritis and to compare them with a group of patients with RA, a group of patients under ICI treatment without irAEs and with a control group of healthy people. We hypothesize that calprotectin is also a marker of inflammatory activity in oncologic patients with rheumatic irAEs and can identify patients with active inflammatory processes. However, we posit that levels will be higher in oncologic patients than in patients with active RA given the inflammatory condition of their underlying disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Study Population

We conducted a retrospective observational study including all adult patients referred to the Rheumatology Department of our centre due to the onset of rheumatic syndromes related to ICI treatment who underwent the determination of serum calprotectin. Data collected included demographic features, history of previous rheumatic diseases, ICI indication and type, and disease manifestations at irAE onset. We classified clinical syndromes according to 4 different categories: (a) inflammatory arthralgia, (b) RA-like, (c) oligo/polyarthritis with or without enthesitis and tenosynovitis, and (d) polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), as in patients with inflammatory proximal muscle pain with or without arthritis. Patients with non-inflammatory arthralgia were excluded. We identified those patients in whom calprotectin determination was routinely performed as a biomarker of inflammatory activity.
As the control group, we used a cohort of RA patients (ACR/EULAR 2010 [26]) from our arthritis unit who were admitted consecutively between July 2020 and July 2021. Patients were included regardless of their disease activity status, previous use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (including biological therapies or JAK inhibitors (JAKi)), and concomitant treatment (methotrexate or others). Patients who, at the study visit, presented signs of an active infection or other clinical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, could modify the results of calprotectin determinations were excluded. All patients underwent clinical assessment, including 28 swollen and tender joint counts (28SJC and 28TJC) and physician and patient global assessment (PhGA and PGA) with visual analogue scales (0–10). Disease activity indices were subsequently calculated. These included the disease activity score (DAS28), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and clinical disease activity index (CDAI). We used the DAS28 to classify patients according to their degree of disease activity, and a subgroup of patients with active disease (DAS28 > 2.6) was identified. We also included a second control group of healthy volunteers, selected from hospital workers with no medical history of interest. To validate our observations, we also determined the levels of calprotectin in a group of cancer patients undergoing treatment with ICI without any irEAs undergoing follow-up observations by the oncology service of our hospital; these patients were attending their control visit and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study as a control group.

2.2. Assessment of Calprotectin

Calprotectin serum levels were determined using a DiaSorin Liaison® Calprotectin assay (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy) [26]. We compared the levels of serum calprotectin determined in each of the groups. We also compared serum calprotectin levels between subgroups of patients with active inflammatory disease at the time of the determination (ICI-induced arthritis vs. RA). The cut-off point in the technique was set at 2 μg/mL [26].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were reported as the mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency and proportions for categorical variables. Differences between groups’ outcomes were compared using Mann–Whitney U-tests. Comparisons between groups were initially conducted in all patients and therefore a subgroup analysis was done including only patients with active rheumatic disease.
Correlation analysis (Spearman’s correlation coefficient) was used to assess the association between serum calprotectin and classic acute phase reactants (CRP and ESR). The performance of calprotectin for the diagnosis of active rheumatic disease (inflammatory activity: yes/no) in the irAEs group was analysed using receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC). The ROC curves made it possible to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) as a measure of the overall discriminative power. The performance of ESR and CRP was also studied, and the discriminative power of the three determinations combined was compared with the isolated determinations for the diagnosis of active rheumatic disease.
The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software (IBM SPSS version 27.0, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and graphics were produced with GraphPad Prism version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). All patients gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the Hospital Clinic Institutional Review Board (HCB/2021/0901).

3. Results

3.1. Patients

Eighteen patients undergoing treatment with ICIs who had been referred to the Rheumatology Department with rheumatic irAEs were included. The mean age was 61 years and 44% were female. Of all the patients referred, six had active arthritis at the time of the calprotectin assessment. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the patients.
The control group consisted of 128 patients with RA (90% female, mean age 55.9 years old, 85.6% were seropositive (anti-rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA)). Of these patients, 90 were undergoing biological treatment (57 with IL-6 inhibitors, 30 with TNF inhibitors, and 3 with rituximab), 28 were undergoing JAK inhibitor treatment, and 11 were being treated with conventional DMARDs. The patients exhibited different degrees of disease activity (mean DAS28 3.38 (1.60)). In total, 60% of the patients had active disease (DAS28 > 2.6): 19 patients had low disease activity (DAS 28 2.6–3.2), 43 had moderate disease activity (DAS28 3.2–5.1), and 17 had high disease activity (activity (DAS28 ≥ 5.1). Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of the RA group. A second control group of 29 healthy donors was also included. The mean age was 47.23 (10.05) years and 73.3% of them were female.

3.2. Serum Calprotectin Levels

The mean serum calprotectin levels in patients with rheumatic irAEs were 5.15 ± 4.96 μg/mL. In the control group of RA patients, the mean serum calprotectin was 3.19 ± 3.60 μg/mL. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p value = 0.8). In the healthy donor group, the mean serum calprotectin was 3.81 ± 1.86 μg/mL, significantly lower than that of the main group (p value = 0.006). Furthermore, we performed a determination of serum calprotectin in eight patients receiving ICI treatment but without irAEs who volunteered for the study. The mean levels of calprotectin in these patients was 2.41 ± 2.05 μg/mL (Figure 1). We found that these levels were significantly lower than those of patients with irAEs (p value 0.49) and without significant differences compared to the healthy controls (p value 0.56).
We also compared the acute-phase reactants. We found that CRP and ESR showed significant differences between the groups (Table 3).
When classifying patients with ICI as patients with active inflammatory activity (n = 6) versus patients without inflammatory activity (n = 12) at the time of the calprotectin assessment, we observed that serum calprotectin levels were higher in the group of active patients (8.43 μg/mL (7.2) vs. 3.53 μg/mL (2.47)). Our findings showed a statistical trend toward higher levels of serum calprotectin in patients with inflammatory activity (p < 0.05). Similarly, when comparing serum calprotectin levels in the group of patients with active RA (DAS28 > 2.6) versus patients in remission, we also found significant differences in serum calprotectin levels in active RA patients (3.94 μg/mL (4.25) vs. 2.03 μg/mL (1.72), p < 0.05)).

3.3. Serum Calprotectin Levels in Patients with Active Arthritis

We performed a sub-analysis to compare the serum levels of calprotectin in patients with active arthritis in both groups (6 patients in the study group and 79 in the RA control group). Although both groups had elevated serum calprotectin levels, we found significantly higher levels of serum calprotectin in the group of patients treated with ICI (8.43 (7.2) μg/mL vs. 3.94 (4.25), p = 0.013)) (Figure 2). No significant differences were observed with CRP or ESR (Table 4).

3.4. Discriminatory Capacity of Serum Calprotectin to Identify Inflammatory Activity in Patients with irAEs

We studied the discriminatory capacity of serum calprotectin to identify patients with active inflammatory activity in the group of patients with irAEs and compared it with the acute-phase reactants. We found that ESR and CRP had moderate discriminatory capacity to identify patients with inflammatory activity, with AUC values of 0.608 and 0.697, respectively (Figure 3a,b). However, serum calprotectin had a very good discriminatory capacity with an AUC of 0.864 (Figure 3c).
The performance of the three biomarkers combined (calprotectin, ESR, and CRP) did not increase the sensitivity of the single calprotectin determination (Figure 4).
The analysis of the correlation between blood biomarkers showed a low correlation between calprotectin and ESR (r = 0.283, p < 0.01) and a moderate correlation between calprotectin and CRP. The correlation between CRP and ESR was also moderate (r = 0. 434, p < 0.01) (Table 5).

4. Discussion

ICIs are widely used in the treatment of various types of cancer. Although they have significant clinical benefits, these therapies are associated with a wide spectrum of irAEs. Currently, it is difficult to generalize the evidence in the existing literature on risk factors or biomarkers for the entire class of ICIs because the studies are either disease-specific or ICI-agent-specific studies.
The optimal biomarker to predict the risk of irAEs remains undefined. Several clinical parameters and biomarkers have been associated with greater toxicity, but none of them has yet been prospectively validated. They include the presence of pre-existing autoimmune disease, chronic smokers, sex and body mass index, tumour response to ICI, circulating cytokines, inherited genetic variants, and specific gut microbiome composition [41,42]. Additionally, patients with significant kidney (stage IV–V), cardiac, and lung disease are at a higher risk of respective organ-specific irAEs [42]. In terms of pre-existing autoimmune diseases, plenty of evidence also suggests that this group of patients has a greater risk of developing irAEs [43,44]. It is interesting to highlight the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with a prior history of IBD [44,45]. In the present study, we found higher levels of conventional biomarkers such as ESR and CRP in patients with rheumatic irAEs in comparison with RA patients and healthy controls, as well as higher levels of serum calprotectin, despite not reaching statistical significance. We also observed that the serum calprotectin in patients with irAEs was higher than in ICI-treated patients without irAEs. Despite the small sample, this results reinforces the idea that serum calprotectin may be a biomarker for the identification of arthritis induced by ICI.
Interestingly, serum levels of calprotectin were higher in patients with active disease in patients with rheumatic irAEs vs. RA. The classical acute-phase reactants (CRP and ESR) did not show statistically significant differences between the groups (Table 4). It seems that serum calprotectin might even more accurately identify patients with inflammatory activity, as shown in the ROC curve analysis.
Another notable result is that the serum calprotectin levels in healthy controls and the RA group were similar, as well as the classic acute-phase reactants. This may be explained in part by the fact that more than half of the RA patients were in remission or exhibited low activity. These findings should be interpreted carefully due to our sample size and the difficulty of interpreting serum biomarkers in patients with underlying neoplasia. The evaluation of biomarkers in patients with cancer is a complex issue and involves the interpretation of the results in the context of the patient’s overall clinical presentation, type of treatment, and cancer stage, among other factors. Biomarkers can be used to help guide treatment decisions and to monitor responses to therapy.
Calprotectin expression is not homogeneous in all types of cancers and varies according to the cell and tissue of origin; for instance, it is reported to be downregulated in cells from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [46]. Serum calprotectin and faecal calprotectin have been used as diagnostic biomarkers in patients with colorectal cancer [47,48].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the clinical value of serum calprotectin in patients undergoing ICI therapy and irAEs. Our study has some limitations including the small sample size of patients with rheumatic irAEs and the cross-sectional design, which precluded us from assessing changes in calprotectin concentrations over time or after treatment. An additional limitation is the lack of information about the cut-off value of serum calprotectin in patients with malignancies and/or in patients with other irAEs. Finally, the monocentric nature of our study may limit the external validity of the results.

5. Conclusions

The diagnosis and follow-up of patients with irAEs is a novel area for clinicians dealing with patients undergoing ICI. Some steps have been taken in the field of ICI-induced colitis, but many questions remain in other areas including rheumatic irAEs. In this context, we present our preliminary experience with a selected group of patients with arthritis induced by ICI who had even higher serum calprotectin levels than patients with active conventional inflammatory arthritis, such as RA. Validation and prospective data in other populations are needed; however, we propose the use of serum calprotectin as a useful biomarker in patients with rheumatic (mainly arthritis) irAEs in conjunction with clinical and conventional inflammatory markers.
We are aware that the OMERACT irAE working group is dealing with the harmonization of several concepts related to ICI-induced arthritis, including the homogenization of definitions concepts and the inclusion of biomarkers [49].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.F.-S., C.A.C., J.M.A. and J.A.G.-P.; methodology, B.F.-S., C.A.C., J.M.A. and J.A.G.-P.; validation, B.F.-S., C.A.C., J.M.A. and J.A.G.-P.; formal analyses, B.F.-S., C.A.C., J.M.A. and J.A.G.-P.; resources, B.F.-S., C.A.C., J.M.A. and J.A.G.-P.; data curation, B.F.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.F.-S., C.A.C., J.M.A. and J.A.G.-P.; writing—review and editing, B.F.-S., C.A.C., J.M.A., A.P., J.C.S.-M., A.B.A., N.S., J.R., V.R.-E., R.M., S.F., P.C., J.D.C., R.S. and J.A.G.-P.; visualization B.F.-S., C.A.C., J.M.A., A.P., J.C.S.-M., A.B.A., N.S., J.R., V.R.-E., R.M., S.F., P.C., J.D.C., R.S. and J.A.G.-P.; supervision, J.A.G.-P.; project administration, J.A.G.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (HCB/2021/0901, approved date corresponds to: 13 September 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tomas Urrego for assisting in the figure design. The authors would like to thank Noemi Reguart and Adela Rodriguez from the oncology department of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona for their participation in the recruitment of patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rotte, A.; Jin, J.Y.; Lemaire, V. Mechanistic Overview of Immune Checkpoints to Support the Rational Design of Their Combinations in Cancer Immunotherapy. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Richter, M.D.; Crowson, C.; Kottschade, L.A.; Finnes, H.D.; Markovic, S.N.; Thanarajasingam, U. Rheumatic Syndromes Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Single-Center Cohort of Sixty-One Patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019, 71, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Calabrese, C.; Kirchner, E.; Kontzias, A.; Velcheti, V.; Calabrese, L.H. Correction: Rheumatic Immune-Related Adverse Events of Checkpoint Therapy for Cancer: Case Series of a New Nosological Entity. RMD Open. 2017, 3, e000412corr1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kostine, M.; Rouxel, L.; Barnetche, T.; Veillon, R.; Martin, F.; Dutriaux, C.; Dousset, L.; Pham-Ledard, A.; Prey, S.; Beylot-Barry, M.; et al. Rheumatic Disorders Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Cancer-Clinical Aspects and Relationship with Tumour Response: A Single-Centre Prospective Cohort Study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mooradian, M.J.; Nasrallah, M.; Gainor, J.F.; Reynolds, K.L.; Cohen, J.V.; Lawrence, D.P.; Miloslavsky, E.M.; Kohler, M.J.; Sullivan, R.J.; Schoenfeld, S.R. Musculoskeletal Rheumatic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: A Single Center Experience. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2019, 48, 1127–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gómez-Puerta, J.A.; Lobo-Prat, D.; Perez-García, C.; Ponce, A.; Frade-sosa, B.; Millán Arciniegas, A.M.; Ojeda, F.; Ruiz-Esquide, V.; Corominas, H. Clinical Patterns and Follow-Up of Inflammatory Arthritis and Other Immune-Related Adverse Events Induced by Checkpoint Inhibitors. A Multicenter Study. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Calabrese, L.; Velcheti, V. Checkpoint Immunotherapy: Good for Cancer Therapy, Bad for Rheumatic Diseases. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuswanto, W.F.; MacFarlane, L.A.; Gedmintas, L.; Mulloy, A.; Choueiri, T.K.; Bermas, B.L. Rheumatologic Symptoms in Oncologic Patients on PD-1 Inhibitors. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2018, 47, 907–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ponce, A.; Frade-Sosa, B.; Sarmiento-Monroy, J.C.; Sapena, N.; Ramírez, J.; Azuaga, A.B.; Morlà, R.; Ruiz-Esquide, V.; Cañete, J.D.; Sanmartí, R.; et al. Imaging Findings in Patients with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Arthritis. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Narváez, J.; Juarez-López, P.; Lluch, J.; Narváez, J.A.; Palmero, R.; García del Muro, X.; Nolla, J.M.; Domingo-Domenech, E. Rheumatic Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients on Anti-PD-1 Inhibitors: Fasciitis with Myositis Syndrome as a New Complication of Immunotherapy. Autoimmun. Rev. 2018, 17, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Crout, T.M.; Lennep, D.S.; Kishore, S.; Majithia, V. Systemic Vasculitis Associated With Immune Check Point Inhibition: Analysis and Review. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2019, 21, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cornejo, C.M.; Haun, P.; English, J.; Rosenbach, M. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Development of Granulomatous Reactions. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019, 81, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fadel, F.; El Karoui, K.; Knebelmann, B. Anti-CTLA4 Antibody–Induced Lupus Nephritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Inciarte-Mundo, J.; Frade-Sosa, B.; Sanmartí, R. From Bench to Bedside: Calprotectin (S100A8/S100A9) as a Biomarker in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1001025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bach, M.; Moon, J.; Moore, R.; Pan, T.; Nelson, J.L.; Lood, C. A Neutrophil Activation Biomarker Panel in Prognosis and Monitoring of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bae, S.C.; Lee, Y.H. Calprotectin Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Their Correlation with Disease Activity: A Meta-Analysis. Postgrad. Med. 2017, 129, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Liang, Y. Clinical Significance of Serum Calprotectin Level for the Disease Activity in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis with Normal C-Reactive Protein. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2019, 1, 1009–1014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Hoovels, L.; Vander Cruyssen, B.; Bogaert, L.; Van Den Bremt, S.; Bossuyt, X. Pre-Analytical and Analytical Confounders of Serum Calprotectin as a Biomarker in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2019, 58, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wollmer, M.; Wändell, P.; Rosenqvist, M.; Larsson, A.; Melander, O.; Wessman, T.; Ärnlöv, J.; Ruge, T. Plasma Calprotectin in the Emergency Department: A Potential Clinical Biomarker for Patients with Infectious Diseases. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 2021, 81, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Austermann, J.; Spiekermann, C.; Roth, J. S100 proteins in rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018, 14, 528–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Frade-Sosa, B.; Ponce, A.; Inciarte-Mundo, J.; Morlà, R.; Ruiz-Esquide, V.; Macías, L.; Azuaga, A.B.; Ramirez, J.; Cañete, J.D.; Yague, J.; et al. Plasma Calprotectin as a Biomarker of Ultrasound Synovitis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving IL-6 Antagonists or JAK Inhibitors. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2022, 14, 1759720X2211141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hammer, H.B.; Ødegård, S.; Fagerhol, M.K.; Landewé, R.; Van Der Heijde, D.; Uhlig, T.; Mowinckel, P.; Kvien, T.K. Calprotectin (a Major Leucocyte Protein) Is Strongly and Independently Correlated with Joint Inflammation and Damage in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007, 66, 1093–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Berner Hammer, H.; Ødegård, S.; Syversen, S.W.; Landewé, R.; van der Heijde, D.; Uhlig, T.; Mowinckel, P.; Kvien, T.K. Calprotectin (a Major S100 Leucocyte Protein) Predicts 10-Year Radiographic Progression in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010, 69, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Choi, I.Y.; Gerlag, D.M.; Herenius, M.J.; Thurlings, R.M.; Wijbrandts, C.A.; Foell, D.; Vogl, T.; Roth, J.; Tak, P.P.; Holzinger, D. MRP8/14 Serum Levels as a Strong Predictor of Response to Biological Treatments in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Inciarte-Mundo, J.; Ramirez, J.; Hernández, M.V.; Ruiz-Esquide, V.; Cuervo, A.; Cabrera-Villalba, S.R.; Pascal, M.; Yagüe, J.; Cañete, J.D.; Sanmarti, R. Calprotectin Strongly and Independently Predicts Relapse in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Polyarticular Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2018, 20, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Macias-Muñoz, L.; Frade-Sosa, B.; Iniciarte-Mundo, J.; Hidalgo, S.; Morla, R.M.; Gallegos, Y.; Sanmarti, R.; Auge, J.M. Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of DiaSorin Liaison® Calprotectin Fecal Assay Adapted for Serum Samples. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022, 36, e24258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pedersen, L.; Nybo, M.; Poulsen, M.K.; Henriksen, J.E.; Dahl, J.; Rasmussen, L.M. Plasma Calprotectin and Its Association with Cardiovascular Disease Manifestations, Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2014, 14, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Malham, M.; Carlsen, K.; Riis, L.; Paerregaard, A.; Vind, I.; Fenger, M.; Wewer, V. Plasma Calprotectin Is Superior to Serum Calprotectin as a Biomarker of Intestinal Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 54, 1214–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nilsen, T.; Sunde, K.; Larsson, A. A New Turbidimetric Immunoassay for Serum Calprotectin for Fully Automatized Clinical Analysers. J. Inflamm. 2015, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Åsberg, A.; Løfblad, L.; Felic, A.; Hov, G.G. Measuring Calprotectin in Plasma and Blood with a Fully Automated Turbidimetric Assay. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2019, 79, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pedersen, L.; Birkemose, E.; Gils, C.; Safi, S.; Nybo, M. Sample Type and Storage Conditions Affect Calprotectin Measurements in Blood. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 2018, 2, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nordal, H.H.; Fagerhol, M.K.; Halse, A.K.; Hammer, H.B. Calprotectin (S100A8/A9) Should Preferably Be Measured in EDTA-Plasma; Results from a Longitudinal Study of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 2018, 78, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Som, A.; Mandaliya, R.; Alsaadi, D.; Farshidpour, M.; Charabaty, A.; Malhotra, N.; Mattar, M.C. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: A Comprehensive Review. World J. Clin. Cases 2019, 7, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. 2017. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Available online: Https://Ctep.Cancer.Gov/Protocoldevelopment/Electronic_applications/Docs/Ctcae_v5_quick_reference_5x7.Pdf (accessed on 15 January 2023).
  35. Abej, E.; El-Matary, W.; Singh, H.; Bernstein, C.N. The Utility of Fecal Calprotectin in the Real-World Clinical Care of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 2016, 2483261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abu-Sbeih, H.; Ali, F.S.; Luo, W.; Qiao, W.; Raju, G.S.; Wang, Y. Importance of Endoscopic and Histological Evaluation in the Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis. J. Immunother. Cancer 2018, 6, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zou, F.; Wang, X.; Oliva, I.C.G.; McQuade, J.L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.C.; Thompson, J.A.; Thomas, A.S.; Wang, Y. Fecal Calprotectin Concentration to Assess Endoscopic and Histologic Remission in Patients with Cancer with Immune-Mediated Diarrhea and Colitis. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e002058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kopi, T.A.; Shahrokh, S.; Mirzaei, A.; Aghdaei, H.A.; Kadijani, A.A. The Role of Serum Calprotectin as a Novel Biomarker in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Review Study. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2019, 12, 183. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kalla, R.; Kennedy, N.A.; Ventham, N.T.; Boyapati, R.K.; Adams, A.T.; Nimmo, E.R.; Visconti, M.R.; Drummond, H.; Ho, G.T.; Pattenden, R.J.; et al. Serum Calprotectin: A Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 1796–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wright, A.P.; Piper, M.S.; Bishu, S.; Stidham, R.W. Systematic Review and Case Series: Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Identifies Most Cases of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 49, 1474–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Smithy, J.W.; Faleck, D.M.; Postow, M.A. Facts and Hopes in Prediction, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Immune-Related Adverse Events. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 1250–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chennamadhavuni, A.; Abushahin, L.; Jin, N.; Presley, C.J.; Manne, A. Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Practical Guide to Identifying High-Risk Patients and Rechallenging Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 779691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alexander, S.; Swami, U.; Kaur, A.; Gao, Y.; Fatima, M.; Ginn, M.M.; Stein, J.E.; Grivas, P.; Zakharia, Y.; Singh, N. Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Cancer and Pre-Existing Autoimmune Disease. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. van der Kooij, M.K.; Suijkerbuijk, K.P.M.; Aarts, M.J.B.; van den Berkmortel, F.W.P.J.; Blank, C.U.; Boers-Sonderen, M.J.; van Breeschoten, J.; van den Eertwegh, A.J.M.; de Groot, J.W.B.; Haanen, J.B.A.G.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of Checkpoint Inhibition in Patients With Melanoma and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease: A Cohort Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abu-Sbeih, H.; Faleck, D.M.; Ricciuti, B.; Mendelsohn, R.B.; Naqash, A.R.; Cohen, J.V.; Sellers, M.C.; Balaji, A.; Ben-Betzalel, G.; Hajir, I.; et al. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Preexisting Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Melle, C.; Ernst, G.; Schimmel, B.; Bleul, A.; Koscielny, S.; Wiesner, A.; Bogumil, R.; Möller, U.; Osterloh, D.; Halbhuber, K.J.; et al. A Technical Triade for Proteomic Identification and Characterization of Cancer Biomarkers. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 4099–4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bayo Calero, J.; Castaño López, M.A.; Casado Monge, P.G.; Díaz Portillo, J.; Bejarano García, A.; Navarro Roldán, F. Analysis of Blood Markers for Early Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2022, 13, 2259–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ross, F.A.; Park, J.H.; Mansouri, D.; Combet, E.; Horgan, P.G.; McMillan, D.C.; Roxburgh, C.S.D. The Role of Faecal Calprotectin in Diagnosis and Staging of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022, 22, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schneider, B.J.; Naidoo, J.; Santomasso, B.D.; Lacchetti, C.; Adkins, S.; Anadkat, M.; Atkins, M.B.; Brassil, K.J.; Caterino, J.M.; Chau, I.; et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 4073–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 15 02984 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagram representing calprotectin levels in the groups. Rhombus represent ICI + irAEs: immune checkpoint inhibitors with rheumatic immune-related adverse event; circles represent RA: rheumatoid arthritis. Square represents ICI without irAEs: immune checkpoint inhibitor control group. Triangle represents control: healthy donors. Calprotectin levels (μg/mL). Statistical significance was reached when comparing the calprotectin levels between the main group (ICI + irAEs) and the control group of oncologic patients without irAEs (p-value 0.49, calculated with the Mann–Whitney test).
Figure 1. Diagram representing calprotectin levels in the groups. Rhombus represent ICI + irAEs: immune checkpoint inhibitors with rheumatic immune-related adverse event; circles represent RA: rheumatoid arthritis. Square represents ICI without irAEs: immune checkpoint inhibitor control group. Triangle represents control: healthy donors. Calprotectin levels (μg/mL). Statistical significance was reached when comparing the calprotectin levels between the main group (ICI + irAEs) and the control group of oncologic patients without irAEs (p-value 0.49, calculated with the Mann–Whitney test).
Cancers 15 02984 g001
Cancers 15 02984 g002 550
Figure 2. Calprotectin levels in relation to inflammatory arthritis at the time of determination. Circles represent RA: rheumatoid arthritis. Squares represent ICI + irAEs: immune checkpoint inhibitors plus irAEs. Calprotectin levels (μg/mL).
Figure 2. Calprotectin levels in relation to inflammatory arthritis at the time of determination. Circles represent RA: rheumatoid arthritis. Squares represent ICI + irAEs: immune checkpoint inhibitors plus irAEs. Calprotectin levels (μg/mL).
Cancers 15 02984 g002
Cancers 15 02984 g003 550
Figure 3. ROC curves of blood biomarkers for inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatic irAEs. (a) ROC curve of ESR, (b) ROC curve of CRP, (c) ROC curve of serum calprotectin. AUC: area under the curve. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein.
Figure 3. ROC curves of blood biomarkers for inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatic irAEs. (a) ROC curve of ESR, (b) ROC curve of CRP, (c) ROC curve of serum calprotectin. AUC: area under the curve. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein.
Cancers 15 02984 g003
Cancers 15 02984 g004 550
Figure 4. ROC curves of combined calprotectin, CRP, and ESR for inflammatory activity in patients with musculoskeletal irAEs. AUC: area under the curve. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CRP: C-reactive protein.
Figure 4. ROC curves of combined calprotectin, CRP, and ESR for inflammatory activity in patients with musculoskeletal irAEs. AUC: area under the curve. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CRP: C-reactive protein.
Cancers 15 02984 g004
Table
Table 1. General characteristics of patients with rheumatic irAEs.
Table 1. General characteristics of patients with rheumatic irAEs.
PatientType of NeoplasiaAge (Years)SexPre-RheumPrevious
irAEs		Type of Cancer TherapyRheumatic irAE PresentationSerum Calprotectin (μg/mL)Active Arthritis Treatment *
1Melanoma58MaleCryoglobulinemiaVitiligoNivolumabOligo/polyarthritis **5.4NoGC
2Lung (squamous)65FemaleNoneNonePembrolizumabRA-like3.8YesGC
3Melanoma65MaleNoneNonePembrolizumab +
Epacadostat		Arthralgia3.2NoNo
4Melanoma68MaleFibromyalgiaNonePembrolizumab + EpacadostatOligo/polyarthritis *22.9YesNo
5Melanoma53MaleNoneNonePembrolizumabArthralgia5.6YesNo
6Breast54MaleNoneNoneAtezolizumabArthralgia7.6YesGC
7Melanoma76FemaleNoneHypophysitis thyroiditisIpilimumab + NivolumabOligo/polyarthritis *1.9NoNo
8Urothelial bladder61FemaleNoneNoneDurvalumabRA-like3.2NoMethotrexate
9Melanoma59FemaleNoneSarcoidosisNivolumabPMR-like1.1NoNo
10Lung61FemaleSeronegative arthritisNonePembrolizumabArthralgia2.7NoGC
11Ovarium80MaleRANonePembrolizumabRA-like4.6YesMethotrexate and GC
12Thyroid73MaleNoneNoneDurvalumab + TremelimumabPM-like4.1NoGC
13Renal77MaleNoneColitis,
hepatitis,
hypothyroidism		Ipilimumab+ NivolumabPMR-like3.9NoMethotrexate
14Lung63FemaleNoneNoneAtezolizumabRA-like3.4noNo
15Lung48MaleNoneHypothyroidismNivolumabOligo/polyarthritis *1.2NoGC
16Liver55FemaleNoneSensitive motor axonal motor polyneuropathyDurvalumabPMR-like2.2NoGC
17Prostate78FemaleNoneNoneNivolumabOligo/polyarthritis *9.9NoNo
18Melanoma75MaleNoneNoneNivolumabOligo/polyarthritis *6.1YesGC and Hydroxichloroquine
Pre-rheum: previous rheumatic condition. * Treatment at the time of calprotectin determination. ** Oligo/polyarthritis with or without enthesitis and tenosynovitis. GC: glucocorticosteroids.
Table
Table 2. Main characteristics of the control group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Table 2. Main characteristics of the control group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Total (n = 128)
Age, mean (sd)55.92 (11.86)
Female, n (%)117 (90.7)
Disease evolution (years), mean (sd)15.1 (10.0)
28TJC, mean (sd)4.43 (6.1)
28SJC, mean (sd)2.2 (3.0)
PGA, mean (sd)4.1 (2.7)
PhGA, mean (sd)3.2 (2.7)
CDAI, mean (sd)13.9 (12.1)
SDAI, mean (sd)14.6 (13.5)
DAS28, mean (sd)3.38 (1.60)
28SJC: 28 swollen joint counts; 28TJC tender joint count; PGA: patient global assessment, PhGA: global assessment; CDAI: clinical disease activity index; SDAI: simplified disease activity index; DAS28: disease activity score. n: number of patients; sd: standard deviation.
Table
Table 3. Levels of classical acute-phase reactants in the different groups of patients.
Table 3. Levels of classical acute-phase reactants in the different groups of patients.
ICI Patients (n = 18)Healthy Donors (n = 29)p-Value
(ICI vs. Healthy Donors)		RA (n = 128)p-Value
(ICI vs. RA)		Total (n = 175)
ESR mm/h. mean (sd)28.50 (34.15)8.10 (4.57)0.00416.06 (19.27)0.0516.56 (21.0)
CRP mg/dL, mean (sd)3.31 (6.28)0.87 (0.18)<0.0010.86 (1.60)0.011.10 (2.63)
ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitors. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein. Sd: standard deviation. U Mann–Whitney test.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of classic acute-phase reactants in ICI patients with active inflammatory activity and patients with active RA (DAS28 > 2.6).
Table 4. Comparison of classic acute-phase reactants in ICI patients with active inflammatory activity and patients with active RA (DAS28 > 2.6).
ICI Patients (n = 6)RA (n = 79)p Value
ESR mm/h, mean (sd)39.33 (50.0)21.78 (22.6)0.4
CRP mg/dL, mean (sd)5.17 (9.5)1.17 (2.0)0.08
ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitors. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CRP: C-reactive protein. Sd: standard deviation. U Mann–Whitney.
Table
Table 5. Correlation between inflammatory biomarkers in the group of patients with irAEs.
Table 5. Correlation between inflammatory biomarkers in the group of patients with irAEs.
ESRCRPSerum Calprotectin
ESR10.434 **0.283 **
CRP0.434 **10.432 **
Serum calprotectin0.283 **0.432 **1
** p-Value < 0.01. Spearman’s correlation coefficient. ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CRP: C-reactive protein [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frade-Sosa, B.; Chacur, C.A.; Augé, J.M.; Ponce, A.; Sarmiento-Monroy, J.C.; Azuaga, A.B.; Sapena, N.; Ramírez, J.; Ruiz-Esquide, V.; Morlà, R.; et al. Calprotectin in Patients with Rheumatic Immunomediated Adverse Effects Induced by Checkpoints Inhibitors. Cancers 2023, 15, 2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112984

AMA Style

Frade-Sosa B, Chacur CA, Augé JM, Ponce A, Sarmiento-Monroy JC, Azuaga AB, Sapena N, Ramírez J, Ruiz-Esquide V, Morlà R, et al. Calprotectin in Patients with Rheumatic Immunomediated Adverse Effects Induced by Checkpoints Inhibitors. Cancers. 2023; 15(11):2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frade-Sosa, Beatriz, Chafik Alejandro Chacur, Josep M. Augé, Andrés Ponce, Juan C. Sarmiento-Monroy, Ana Belén Azuaga, Nuria Sapena, Julio Ramírez, Virginia Ruiz-Esquide, Rosa Morlà, and et al. 2023. "Calprotectin in Patients with Rheumatic Immunomediated Adverse Effects Induced by Checkpoints Inhibitors" Cancers 15, no. 11: 2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112984

APA Style

Frade-Sosa, B., Chacur, C. A., Augé, J. M., Ponce, A., Sarmiento-Monroy, J. C., Azuaga, A. B., Sapena, N., Ramírez, J., Ruiz-Esquide, V., Morlà, R., Farietta, S., Corzo, P., Cañete, J. D., Sanmartí, R., & Gómez-Puerta, J. A. (2023). Calprotectin in Patients with Rheumatic Immunomediated Adverse Effects Induced by Checkpoints Inhibitors. Cancers, 15(11), 2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop