Next Article in Journal
Improved Survival and Symptom Relief Following Palliative Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion for Leptomeningeal Disease from Brain Cancers: A Case Series and Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
IL-1β in Neoplastic Disease and the Role of Its Tumor-Derived Form in the Progression and Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Calreticulin—From the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Plasma Membrane—Adventures of a Wandering Protein

by
Gillian C. Okura
1,
Alamelu G. Bharadwaj
1 and
David M. Waisman
1,2,*
1
Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 1X5, Canada
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 1X5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2025, 17(2), 288; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020288
Submission received: 18 November 2024 / Revised: 11 January 2025 / Accepted: 14 January 2025 / Published: 17 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Cancer Biology)

Simple Summary

This review examines the chronological timeline of studies identifying and characterizing calreticulin (CRT) from its origin as an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein to an important cell surface signaling molecule. A detailed literature analysis shows that CRT was initially discovered as the Ca2+-binding ER protein, called calregulin, and not as the SR protein(s), called the high-affinity calcium-binding protein (HACBP). We further elucidate the critical functions of CRT in calcium homeostasis, protein folding, immunogenic cell death (ICD), and antigen presentation. The roles of CRT in the regulation of the destruction of cancer cells by the immune system and as a causative factor in certain blood cancers are also discussed. Overall, this review critically and comprehensively identifies the original studies that revealed CRT’s discovery, structure, and functions in the ER and at the cell surface.

Abstract

Calreticulin (CRT) is a 46 kDa highly conserved protein initially identified as calregulin, a prominent Ca2+-binding protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Subsequent studies have established that CRT functions in the ER’s protein folding response and Ca2+ homeostatic mechanisms. An ER retention signal on the carboxyl terminus of CRT suggested that CRT was restricted to the ER. However, the identification of CRT in the nucleus and cytosol has established that CRT is a multi-compartmental, multifunctional protein. CRT also plays an important role in cancer progression. Most recently, CRT was identified on the cell surface and shown to be a potent ‘eat-me’ signal that plays a key role in the uptake of apoptotic and viable cancer cells by phagocytes. Elevated CRT exposure on the outer leaflet of cancer cells has been linked with anticancer immunity and superior therapeutic outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, acute myeloid leukemia, ovarian cancer, and high-grade serous carcinomas. Mutations in the CRT gene have been identified in a subset of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. The most recent studies from our laboratory have revealed a new and significant function for extracellular CRT as a plasminogen receptor. This discovery has profound implications for our understanding of the role of CRT in myeloproliferative neoplasms, specifically, essential thrombocythemia.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Calreticulin (CRT), a highly conserved 46 kDa protein, has received considerable attention as a multifunctional molecule with diverse roles in intracellular and extracellular processes. Initially identified as a calcium-binding protein in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), CRT’s significance has expanded far beyond its initial characterization. This protein is now understood to be an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident protein, where it plays critical roles in calcium homeostasis and protein folding. Structurally, CRT consists of three distinct domains: the N-terminal domain, the proline-rich P-domain, and the C-terminal domain, each contributing to its adaptable functionality. Beyond its intracellular roles, CRT has been found to operate in extracellular spaces, on cell surfaces, and even in the cytosol and nucleus, participating in processes such as calcium homeostasis, chaperone function and protein folding, antigen presentation, and immune response regulation, especially during immunogenic cell death (ICD). CRT has also been shown to participate in the recognition of cancer cells by immune cells and in the phagocytosis of cancer cells. Mutations in CRT have been identified in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), which have contributed to our understanding of the etiology of this disease.
This review presents a new perspective on the historical events that led to the discovery of CRT. We also delineate the chronological events that led to the discovery of CRT and highlight the key original studies that have led to our knowledge of its structure and function. We also discuss the structural features and multifaceted functions of CRT in both intracellular and extracellular contexts and focus on the established functions of CRT in cancer.

2. Calreticulin-Enigmatic Discovery

It has been more than 40 years since the report of the HACBP as a Ca2+-binding protein of the rabbit skeletal muscle SR. This section introduces the concept that although countless publications quote the HACBP as the first report of CRT, a rigorous analysis of the publications that followed that report suggests that the HACBP was likely a mixture of several proteins. Furthermore, the biochemical characterization of the HACBP presented in that publication indicates that it is distinct from CRT.

2.1. Identification of the HACBP in Skeletal Muscle SR

It has been suggested that calreticulin (CRT) was originally identified as a Ca2+-binding protein of the rabbit muscle SR, called the high-affinity Ca2+-binding protein (HACBP) [1]. We have conducted a rigorous literature analysis of papers that have characterized the Ca2+-binding proteins of the rabbit skeletal muscle SR [2]. Because none of these laboratories has detected the HACBP or CRT in skeletal muscle SR preparations (Table 1), we have concluded that CRT is not the HACBP and is also not present in the rabbit skeletal muscle SR [2].
We were also unable to find supportive evidence for the existence of the HACBP as a single protein, as it has been shown convincingly that the band in the SDS-PAGE analysis of the rabbit skeletal muscle SR, reported by MacLennan and called the HACBP, was actually composed of three to five proteins [3,4,5]. Furthermore, the characterization of the HACBP by the MacLennan laboratory [5,6,7] differs significantly from the known biochemical properties reported for CRT, suggesting that the HACBP and CRT are distinct proteins. Our comprehensive analysis of the published studies on the SR’s Ca2+-binding proteins from other laboratories has forced the rewriting of the dogma that CRT is present in the rabbit muscle SR and was initially identified as the HACBP [2]. In this section, we summarize our findings and critically evaluate the events leading to the discovery of the HACBP and the suggestion that the HACBP is CRT.
In 1970, the MacLennan laboratory published a procedure for purifying the rabbit muscle SR [8]. When analyzed using the Weber and Osborn SDS-PAGE procedure [9], their SR preparation resolved into seven major Coomassie blue staining bands. The MacLennan laboratory identified the proteins corresponding to four of these bands as the Ca2+ ATPase (100 kDa), calsequestrin (44 kDa), a 30 kDa protein, and a proteolipid (12 kDa). The MacLennan laboratory also identified a prominent 55 kDa Coomassie blue staining band, which they assumed contained a single protein. The 55 kDa band was called the HACBP and characterized in 1974. To purify the HACBP, they subjected the SR preparation to four column-chromatography steps. SDS-PAGE was used to analyze the chromatography elution profiles, and the fractions containing the 55 kDa Coomassie blue staining band were pooled. The pooled 55 kDa fractions were named the HACBP and characterized as a Ca2+-binding protein [7]. That year, MacLennan also reported that the HACBP comprised 5–10% of the SR proteins, while calsequestrin comprised about 15–20% [6].
Then, in 1979, the MacLennan laboratory reexamined the contribution of the HACBP to the 55 kDa band. For this analysis, they used the Laemmli slab gel system and a two-dimensional slab gel system utilizing a Weber–Osborn separation in one dimension and a Laemmli separation in the second dimension [10]. They found four protein bands in the 55 kDa region, the most prominent of which was a diffusely stained protein of about 53 kDa [10]. However, which of these four bands corresponded to the HACBP was not reported. Two postdoctoral fellows at the MacLennan Laboratory, Dr. Marek Michalak and Dr. Kevin Campbell, also reanalyzed the rabbit muscle SR proteins using the Laemmli SDS-PAGE method [11]. They confirmed that the Weber and Osborn SDS-PAGE procedure used for detecting and purifying the HACBP had failed to resolve several proteins of similar molecular weights present in the HACBP band. They utilized a high-resolution strategy to separate the SR proteins: using Weber and Osborn SDS-PAGE in the first dimension and Laemmli SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. This procedure resolved the 55 kDa staining band into multiple proteins. Campbell reported three of these proteins: HCABP-1 (53 kDa), HACBP-2 (55 kDa), and HACBP-3 (56 kDa) [12] (reviewed by Campbell in [5]). The most prominent of these proteins, HACBP-1, comprised more than 90% of the 55 kDa band and was called the 53 kDa glycoprotein [4]. The other proteins, HACBP-2 and HACBP-3, were not purified or characterized, so it was unclear which of these bands corresponded to the HACBP. Michalak reported the presence of at least five proteins present in the 55 kDa band. He also noted that pyruvate kinase comprised about 2% of that band and that the mitochondrial F1 subunits were also present [3]. Therefore, Michalak’s data suggest that the HACBP should comprise about 5% of the 55 kDa proteins. Although Michalak alluded to the HACBP as being one of the five 55 kDa proteins of the rabbit skeletal muscle SR, the HACBP was never purified from the other 55 kDa proteins and characterized.
The possibility that the 55 kDa fraction purified and characterized by MacLennan [6,7,13,14] contained multiple proteins was likely because MacLennan used the Weber and Osborn SDS-PAGE method to detect and pool this fraction, and this method could not discriminate between any of the five proteins in the HACBP band. The basic difference between these two methods is that the Weber and Osborne method is a continuous electrophoresis method in which proteins are electrophoresed in a single buffer. In contrast, the Laemmli system is a discontinuous system that utilizes a stacking gel on top of a resolving gel. The stacking gel generates a tight voltage gradient between the leading edge of one buffer and the trailing edge of a second buffer, resulting in proteins of different charges forming narrow bands or discs, driven by the voltage gradient at the discontinuity. As such, the Laemmli procedure results in tighter protein bands.
MacLennan reported the purification of about 6 mg of calsequestrin from 800 mg of rabbit muscle, using three chromatography columns [15]. They utilized four chromatography columns to purify the HACBP and reported the yield as 1 mg/800 g skeletal muscle tissue [7]. This suggests a relative ratio of about 1:5 for the HACBP/calsequestrin. The Weber and Osborn SDS-PAGE analysis presented by MacLennan [7] showed that the relative staining intensity between the band containing calsequestrin and the HACBP band was about 5/1. If the 1 mg of HACBP was pure HACBP/CRT and considering that it comprises 5% of the 55 kDa band, one would expect that the SR preparation would contain (100%/5% × 1 mg) 20 mg of 55 kDa HACBP-band proteins. Thus, the 55 kDa HACBP band would be expected to be (20 mg/6 mg), about three times the staining intensity of calsequestrin, which is not observed (Figure 1A).
In his extensive historical review of the rabbit skeletal muscle SR proteins, Campbell addressed the issue of the content of the 55 kDa Coomassie blue staining band that was initially reported by MacLennan and named the HACBP. The SDS-PAGE analysis of the MacLennan rabbit skeletal muscle SR preparation, reanalyzed by Campbell, is presented in Figure 1. As indicated, the 53 kDa glycoprotein was the dominant protein in the 55 kDa region. Notably, Stains-all did not stain any proteins in the 55 kDa region (Figure 1B). Similarly, Van et al. [16] reported that although the intense Stains-all staining of calsequestrin was observed in their SR preparation, no Stains-all staining was detected in the 55 kDa region of the gel, i.e., CRT was not detected. These authors, however, observed the Stains-all staining of the CRT in other tissues (Figure 2).
It is interesting that Campbell reported that the purified HACBP(s) did not bind Stains-all [5] (Figure 1B). Campbell pioneered Stains-all for the staining of Ca2+-binding proteins and demonstrated that Stains-all was a more sensitive stain for Ca2+-binding proteins than Coomassie blue [17]. The Campbell publication, therefore, directly repudiates Michalak’s claim that the HACBP and CRT are identical proteins.
Notably, the Ca2+-binding properties of the HACBP and CRT are distinct. CRT binds 1 Ca2+, with a Kd value of about 0.1 μM [18,19], and about 30 mol of Ca2+, with a Kd value of 1–2 mM [19,20]. Scatchard analysis of Ca2+ binding by CRT reveals a biphasic plot, which indicates the presence of two classes of Ca2+-binding sites [16,19,21]. In contrast, the Scatchard plot presented by MacLennan [7], which spans from 1 μM to 500 μM Ca2+, reveals the binding of one Ca2+ and has a single slope consistent with a single class of Ca2+-binding sites (Kd = 2.5–4 μM). This is consistent with the binding of one Ca2+ (Kd = 4 μM) and the absence of low-affinity Ca2+ sites reported in MacLennan et al. [6]. The studies of Ca2+ binding by CRT were performed using the equilibrium dialysis method (discussed in ref. [22]). Therefore, the inability of the HACBP to be stained by Stains-all and its binding of only a single high-affinity Ca2+ firmly establish that the HACBP and CRT must be distinct proteins [2].
The Michalak laboratory reported using an antibody to the HACBP to clone CRT from a skeletal muscle library. According to Michalak, that antibody was generated against the HACBP protein that was purified using the MacLennan rabbit skeletal muscle SR preparation. Michalak used the HACBP protein to generate antibodies that were then used to clone CRT from a skeletal muscle library. However, it was published in 1993 that a highly sensitive antibody to CRT failed to detect CRT in skeletal muscle SR preparations [23]. The inability to detect the HACBP/CRT in the SR is, therefore, consistent with reports from multiple laboratories using various techniques, including high-resolution SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie blue or Stains-all staining, 45Ca2+ autoradiography, immunodetection, or mass spectroscopy, which have all failed to detect the HACBP or CRT in the skeletal muscle SR (Table 1).
Table 1. Analysis of Skeletal Muscle SR Proteins.
Table 1. Analysis of Skeletal Muscle SR Proteins.
StudyStudy YearCSQHACBP53 kDa GlycoproteinMethod of DetectionReference
Ostwald and MacLennan1974++NDCoomassie Blue Stain 1[13]
Michalak et al.1980+++Coomassie Blue Stain 2,3[3]
Campbell et al.1980++ 4+Coomassie Blue Stain 3[12]
Campbell and MacLennan1981+ND+Coomassie Blue Stain 3[4]
Campbell and MacLennan1982+ND+Coomassie Blue Stain 3[24]
Campbell et al.1983+ND+Coomassie Blue Stain 2,
Stains-All
[25]
Campbell et al.1983+ND+Coomassie Blue Stain 2,
Stains-All
[17]
Macer and Koch1988+ND+Coomassie Blue Stain 2,
45Ca2+ Autoradiography
[26]
Damiani et al.1988+ND 45Ca2+ Autoradiography[27]
Leberer et al.1989+ND+Coomassie Blue Stain 2,
45Ca2+ Autoradiography
[28]
Hofmann et al.1989+ND+45Ca2+ Autoradiography,
Stains-All
[29]
Van et al.1989+NDNDStains-All[16]
Leberer et al.1990+ND+Coomassie Blue Stain 2[30]
Cala et al.1990+NDNDStains-All[31]
Damiani and Margret1991+ND+Stains-All,
45Ca2+ Autoradiography,
Ponceau Red 3
[32]
Raeymaekers et al.1993NDNDNDImmunodetection with CRT Antibody[23]
Treves2009+ND+Coomassie Blue[33]
Staunton2012+ND+Mass Spectrometry[34]
+, protein detected; ND, not detected. This table summarizes the data presented by multiple laboratories, detailing the proteins of the skeletal muscle SR. 1 the method of SDS-PAGE was according to Weber and Osborn [9]. MacLennan reported that in the SDS-PAGE analysis of the rabbit muscle, the skeletal muscle SR yielded several Coomassie blue staining bands, including a 55 kDa band that he called the HACBP. 2 analysis by 2-D gel—Weber and Osborn (first dimension) and Laemmli (second dimension). Michalak reported that the 55 kDa band (HACBP) detected using Weber and Osborn SDS-PAGE resolved into five distinct bands [11]. 3 SDS-PAGE, according to Laemmli. 4 Campbell reported the 55 kDa band (HACBP) detected using Weber and Osborn SDS-PAGE resolved into 53 kDa, 55 kDa, and 56 kDa bands [12]. The 53 kDa band (a 53 kDa glycoprotein) comprised greater than 90% of the staining intensity. None of these bands reacted to Stains-All [5].

2.2. Does the HACBP Actually Exist?

To rationalize the existence of the HACBP, we must test two possible scenarios. The first scenario is that MacLennan, as stated in his several publications published around 1974 [6,7,13,14,35], purified 1 mg of the HACBP from 800 g of rabbit skeletal muscle as a single pure protein. The second scenario is that MacLennan purified 1 mg of a mixture of three to five 55 kDa proteins from 800 g of rabbit skeletal muscle (equivalent to two rabbits). If we test scenario 1, we must assume that MacLennan purified about 1 mg of pure HACBP protein and not a mixture of proteins from the skeletal muscle SRs of two rabbits. To avoid confusion as to which of the multiple bands of the 55 kDa Coomassie blue staining band is the HACBP, we will utilize Campbell’s analysis and refer to the HACBP as HACBP-2. This scenario would identify HACBP-2 as an abundant protein of the rabbit skeletal muscle SR, which would be easily detectable by the Coomassie blue staining of SDS-PAGE gels. Let us consider that the 55 kDa band comprises more than 90% 53 kDa glycoprotein and only 5% HACBP-2. We can back-calculate the total protein content of the 55 kDa band obtained from the skeletal muscle SRs of two rabbits, using relative ratios and assuming 1 mg of pure HACBP-2. This calculation suggests that about 18 mg of the 53 kDa glycoprotein, 1 mg of HACBP-2, and 1 mg of other proteins (pyruvate kinase, etc.) comprise the HACBP band, i.e., about 20 mg in total. Thus, comparing the 55 kDa band (20 mg) with that of calsequestrin (6 mg) would suggest that the 55 kDa proteins are collectively more prevalent than calsequestrin by threefold. Therefore, in Weber and Osborn SDS-PAGE, the Coomassie-blue-stained 55 kDa band should be more intense than the calsequestrin band. However, calsequestrin staining is actually at least twice as intense as HACBP staining [7]. Also, according to this scenario, the HACBP should be easily detectable, but, clearly, this is not the case; see (Figure 1) and Table 1.
The second scenario is that MacLennan purified 1 mg of a mixture of several 55 kDa proteins. We believe this is the true scenario. MacLennan stated, “Recently, we reexamined the contribution of the high-affinity calcium-binding protein to the 55,000-Dalton band, using the Laemmli slab gel system and a two-dimensional slab gel system utilizing a Weber–Osborn separation in one dimension and a Laemmli system in the second dimension. We found some four-protein bands in the 55,000-Dalton region, the most prominent of which was a diffusely staining protein of about 53,000 Daltons” [10]. Unfortunately, MacLennan did not identify, nor has ever identified, which, if any, of the four bands was the HACBP. This scenario would mean that the characterization of this protein mixture as a single protein, published by MacLennan [3,6,7,10,13,14], is erroneous. If we assume that the HACBP-2 is one of the five proteins detected by Michalak [3], which MacLennan pooled and called the HACBP; then, considering that 90% of this band is the 53 kDa glycoprotein and 2% is pyruvate kinase, about 5% is expected to be the HACBP-2. According to MacLennan, 1 mg of the 55 kDa protein band was obtained from 800 g of rabbit muscle, corresponding to two rabbits. Therefore, about (5% of 1 mg) 0.05 mg of pure HACBP would be recovered from two rabbits. This scenario would be consistent with the SDS-PAGE analysis of the SR preparation (Figure 1). It would also be consistent with the fact that the HACBP-2 is only a minor protein of the SR. However, this scenario creates another issue. The antibody generation strategy, used by Michalak to prepare a CRT antibody for use in his detection of CRT clones in a λgt11 library, required the injection of 3 mg of protein into a goat. Michalak claimed to purify the HACBP to prepare antibodies, using the MacLennan procedure [36]. Assuming that two goats were used, that would mean that (6/0.05 × 2) or 240 rabbits would be required for sufficient purified HACBP to inject and produce the antibodies used to clone CRT [1].

2.3. Are the HACBP and CRT the Same Protein?

Regardless of whether or not the HACBP exists as a pure protein or as a mixture of multiple proteins, the fact is that the HACBP does not react with Stains-all (Figure 1 and Figure 2) and has markedly different Ca2+-binding properties than CRT, especially the absence of multiple low-affinity Ca2+/Mg2+ sites [6,7]. Therefore, CRT and the HACBP are distinct proteins. Furthermore, our extensive analysis has concluded that more than ten laboratories have not detected CRT in the skeletal muscle SR (Table 1). Therefore, we must conclude that CRT is absent in the rabbit skeletal muscle SR, unlike the HACBP.

2.4. Discovery of CRT as Calregulin

We propose that CRT was initially discovered not as the HACBP but as calregulin, a major Ca2+-binding protein of the liver ER, in 1984 and 1985 [37,38], and partially sequenced in 1987 [39]. Subsequently, Van et al. [16] identified calregulin by N-terminal sequencing analysis of the ERs of several rat tissues. They confirmed that calregulin bound 1 mole of Ca2+ per mole of protein (Kd = 1 μM) in the presence of Mg2+ and was stained by Stains-all, and, importantly, they were unable to detect calregulin in the skeletal muscle SR by Stains-all staining, whereas calsequestrin was easily visualized (Figure 2). In 1989, calregulin was renamed as calreticulin by Koch, MacLennan, and Michalak [40].

3. Calreticulin–Gene Structure

The human Ro/SS-A autoantigen was shown to match the N-terminal sequence of calregulin [41,42] and, later, the entire sequence of CRT [40]. The human Ro/SS-A autoantigen (CRT) was localized on chromosome 19 at locus p13.3–p13.2 [41,43]. The CRT promoter regions consist of binding sites for transcription factors, such as NKx2.5 (NK2 transcription factor related, locus 5), COUP-TF1 (chick ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor 1) [44], MEF2C (myocyte enhancer factor-2C) [45], GATA6 (GATA binding protein 6), Evi-1 (ecotropic viral integration site-1) [46], and OLF-1 (olfactory-neuron-specific transcription factor) [47], and has retinoblastoma control elements [48]. Calcium depletion from the ER and ER stress are key activators of CRT expression [49,50,51].

4. CRT Domain Structure

CRT has a molecular mass of 46.9 kDa and an anomalous apparent molecular mass, in SDS-PAGE, of 63 kDa [37]. As discussed, CRT was originally called calregulin and was shown to localize in the ER [18,21,37,38,39,52]. Calregulin was shown to localize in the Ca2+ storage regions of the ER [16].
CRT is synthesized as a precursor protein containing an amino terminally located signal peptide (residues 1–17). CRT is composed of three structural and functional domains: a highly conserved amino-terminal N-domain (residues 18–197), a central proline-rich P-domain (residues 198–308), and a carboxyl-terminal C-domain (residues 309–417) [40,53]. The P- and C-domains extend from the N-domain core, and in the presence of Ca2+, the P-domain hairpin-like structure folds back on itself and associates with the C-domain.
Like its ER membrane homolog, calnexin, CRT has an amino-terminal N-domain that is a highly conserved, stable globular structure with eight antiparallel β-strands and a disulfide bridge [54,55,56]. The N-domain possesses low-affinity, high-capacity, Zn+-binding sites (Kd = 310 μM and 14 moles of zinc per mole of CRT) [21,57] and a binding site for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [58]. Although initially reported to be in the P-domain [53], the N-domain also has a single Ca2+-binding site, with a sub-micromolar Kd value [16,18,21,38]. This Ca2+ is coordinated by seven oxygen atoms contributed by the bidentate side chain of Asp328; backbone carbonyls of Gln26, Lys62, and Lys64; and two water molecules [56]. The high-affinity Ca2+-binding site is conceptually similar to another well-described Ca2+-binding site, namely, the endonexin fold of the annexin proteins. The endonexin fold is considered to be the signature amino acid sequence present in the annexin family of Ca2+-binding proteins and houses the Ca2+-binding motif (KGXGT-38 residues—D/E) (reviewed in [59]). However, these sites are Ca2+/Mg2+ sites, as although Mg2+ does not activate phospholipid binding, it does inhibit Ca2+-dependent phospholipid binding [60].
The N-domain of CRT possesses polypeptide- and carbohydrate-binding sites [58,61,62,63,64]. CRT exerts this chaperone function by recognizing monoglucosylated N-linked glycans (Glc1Man5–9GlcNAc2) present transiently on nascent glycoproteins in the ER [63,65].
The polypeptide binding site consists of mainly hydrophobic interactions provided by Phe74, Trp319, Cys105, Cys137, and Asp135 [55]. The lectin binding region can bind a tetrasaccharide via an extensive network of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts. The oxygen O(2) in glucose occupies a pocket formed by CRT side chains while forming direct hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl of Gly(124) and the side chain of Lys(111). In contrast, the Cys(105)-Cys(137) disulfide bond interacts with the third and fourth sugar moieties of the Glc(1)Man(3) tetrasaccharide. The chaperone activity of CRT is induced by various conditions associated with ER stress, including calcium depletion and heat shock [66]. Interestingly, Ca2+ is essential for CRT to bind isolated oligosaccharides and to recognize glycosylated proteins in vitro [63,65], whereas Zn2+ stimulates the ability of CRT to suppress the thermal aggregation of unglycosylated proteins in vitro [67]. Mutagenesis studies have suggested that the lectin-binding site is the predominant contributor to the chaperone function of CRT [68]. However, CRT can bind to denatured proteins independent of their glycosylated status [69]. This interaction is dependent on both Ca2+ and ATP.
It was originally proposed that the N-domain also interacts with the DNA-binding site of glucocorticoid receptors and prevents the receptors from binding to their specific glucocorticoid response element [70]. However, this claim was later rescinded [71,72].
The central P-domain of CRT is high in proline content and possesses several regions consisting of repeated amino acid sequences. The repeated motif 1 (I-DPD/EA-KPEDWDD/E) and motif 2 (G-W- -P-I-NP-Y) are present as 1,1,1,2,2,2. The P-domain also forms a relatively rare β-stranded hairpin-like structure formed by the proline-rich region. The hairpin-like structure forms a hook-like arm, the tip of which contains the binding site for ERp57 [73]. This region is stabilized by a three-strand antiparallel β-sheet formed by the amino acid repeat sequences. The P-domain interacts with other proteins that function as ER chaperones and form ER chaperone–substrate complexes, such as ERp29 [74], CypB [75], PDI1A [76,77,78], and ERp57 [61,79,80]. This region, along with the central N-domain of the protein, participates in the chaperone function of CRT. Although initial studies localized the high-affinity Ca2+ site to the P-domain [53], more recent studies have established that the N-domain contains this site [67,81].
The carboxyl-terminal C-domain of CRT contains many acidic amino acid residues that are responsible for forming multiple low-affinity Ca2+/Mg2+-binding sites. These sites bind about 30–50 moles of Ca2+ per mole of protein, with a Kd value of 1–4 mM [20,82]. The low-affinity sites are not specific for only Ca2+ and are not detected in the presence of millimolar Mg2+ [16,21]. The CRT C-domain displays a disordered structure at low Ca2+ concentrations, whereas at higher Ca2+ concentrations, it assumes a more rigid and compact conformation [83]. The last four residues of the C-domain possess the sequence KDEL, which functions as an ER lumen retention/retrieval domain [84]. However, two independently operating retention/retrieval mechanisms have been suggested for CRT based on mutagenesis studies: one is a Ca2+-dependent mechanism providing for direct retention in the ER and involving the C-domain; the other is a KDEL-based retrieval system for escaped CRT present in the Golgi apparatus [85]. Furthermore, the deletion of the C-domain does not affect the chaperone activity of CRT, suggesting that the main roles of CRT in the ER, lectin chaperone, and Ca2+ buffer are mutually independent [86]. The C-domain’s Ca2+/Mg2+ sites also mediate the interaction of extracellular CRT with the plasma membrane’s phosphatidylserine and in CRT-mediated phagocytosis [87]. The domain structure of CRT is presented in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Structure of calreticulin domains. The three-dimensional models are based on NMR, X-ray crystallography, and Cryo-EM data. The N-domain (PDB ID:3POW) and P-domain (PDB ID:1HHN) are shown. A crystal structure is not available for the C-domain. The calreticulin protein consists of a signal peptide (tan), an N-terminal globular domain (blue), a central proline-rich P-domain (red), a C-terminal Ca2+/Mg2+-binding C-domain (green), and an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal, KDEL (purple). A subdomain (S-domain) is located between amino acids 160 and 283 [88,89]. Binding partners of CRT (summarized in Table 2) are shown below their interacting domain; a.a. (amino acids).
Figure 3. Structure of calreticulin domains. The three-dimensional models are based on NMR, X-ray crystallography, and Cryo-EM data. The N-domain (PDB ID:3POW) and P-domain (PDB ID:1HHN) are shown. A crystal structure is not available for the C-domain. The calreticulin protein consists of a signal peptide (tan), an N-terminal globular domain (blue), a central proline-rich P-domain (red), a C-terminal Ca2+/Mg2+-binding C-domain (green), and an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal, KDEL (purple). A subdomain (S-domain) is located between amino acids 160 and 283 [88,89]. Binding partners of CRT (summarized in Table 2) are shown below their interacting domain; a.a. (amino acids).
Cancers 17 00288 g003
Table 2. Interaction partners of calreticulin.
Table 2. Interaction partners of calreticulin.
Protein Binding Affinity (Kd) CRT Domain Reference(s)
TRIM21 (tripartite motif-containing protein 21)NRN- and C-terminal domains[90]
PDIA3 (protein disulfide–isomerase A3, ERp57)5–9 μMP-domain[80,91,92]
Perforin1.2 μMN- and C-domains[93,94,95]
Integrin α-subunit0.25 μMN-domain[96,97]
PPIB (peptidyl–prolyl cis–trans isomerase B)10 μMP-domain[75]
PDIA5 (protein disulfide–isomerase A5)0.16 μMP-domain[98]
Glycosylated laminin0.5 μMN-domain[99]
GABARAP (Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor-associated protein)64 nMN-domain[100,101]
SPACA9 (sperm acrosome-associated protein 9)NRNR[102]
CLCC1 (chloride channel CLIC-like 1)NRNR[103]
C1q100 nMN- and P-domains[88,104,105,106]
MBL (mannose-binding lectin)NRN- and P-domains[107]
ERp2913 μMP-domain[74]
CD40L50 nMN- and P-domains[108]
LDL receptor-related protein 1
(CD-91)
NR [109]
Thrombospondin (TSP-1)NRN-domain[110,111]
Phosphatidylserine12 μMC-domain[87]
The data for documented binding partners of CRT are included in this table. CRT also interacts with many ER proteins and transiently associates with numerous different newly synthesized glycoproteins as they enter the secretory pathway. These interactions are not included. NR, not reported. The C1q- and MBL-binding sites are present in a subdomain contributed by the N- and P-domains, called the S-domain (residues 160–283) [88,89].

5. CRT–Metal Ion Binding Properties

The initial studies of the cation-binding properties of CRT suggested that the high-affinity Ca2+-binding site and the Zn2+-binding sites in CRT were relatively specific. The high-affinity Ca2+ binding is unaffected by a 500-fold excess of Zn2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, or Fe2+, whereas Zn2+ binding, as monitored by changes in intrinsic fluorescence, was unaffected by a 10-fold excess of Ca2+, Mg2+, or Mn2+ [16,21]. We initially observed that Ca2+ and Zn2+ induce different conformational changes in CRT. Ca2+ binding results in the movement of tryptophan away from the solvent, whereas Zn2+ causes a movement of tryptophan into the solvent and the exposure of a hydrophobic region [21]. Subsequently, it was shown that the occupancy of the high-affinity Ca2+ site in CRT increases the protein’s thermal stability and conformational rigidity as a consequence of an increase in hydrophobic packing but does not change its overall three-dimensional structure [67]. In contrast, the occupancy of the low-affinity Ca2+ sites increases the protein’s thermal stability and conformational rigidity, also because of an increase in the stabilization of the hydrophobic core [67]. The occupancy of the low-affinity zinc sites alters the internal hydrophobic packing of the protein, resulting in a more expanded tertiary structure.
Studies of the best-described Ca2+-binding motif, the “EF-hand” [112], have allowed the classification of Ca2+-binding sites, according to their specificity toward Mg2+, into specific Ca2+ sites and Ca2+/Mg2+ sites (reviewed in [113,114]). For example, Li et al. [67] have shown that CRT is proteolyzed by chymotrypsin in the presence of 3 mM MgCl2. However, the addition of micromolar Ca2+ in the presence of Mg2+ confers complete resistance to digestion by chymotrypsin. This further suggests that Mg2+ does not compete with Ca2+ for binding to the high-affinity Ca2+ site.
To understand the functional significance of the Ca2+- and Zn2+-binding sites, it is necessary to appreciate the physiological concentrations of Ca2+, Zn2+, and Mg2+ in the cell. The total (free and bound) Ca2+ concentration within the ER is estimated to be about 2 mM, while the free ER Ca2+ varies from 50 to 500 μM [115,116]. The ER is one of the major cellular Mg2+ pools, with a total concentration from 14 to 18 mM [117] and free concentrations from 0.5 to 1 mM [118]. In contrast, free Zn2+ in the ER is about 5 nM [119]. Zn2+ is required for ER functions, and its deficiency can lead to an increase in the level of unfolded protein and ER stress because many proteins bind or acquire zinc in the ER [120]. Regarding the interactions of Ca2+ and Mg2+ with a Ca2+-binding site, multiple studies have shown that the conformational changes in proteins, resulting from Ca2+ or Mg2+ binding, are distinct. Differences in ionic radii, hydration, and coordination geometry are essential properties that enable Ca2+-binding proteins to discriminate between Ca2+ and Mg2+ [121]. Most importantly, Ca2+/Mg2+-binding sites typically display unique conformational changes in response to Ca2+ or Mg2+ because Mg2+ is much smaller than Ca2+. The coordination of Ca2+ and Mg2+ by proteins is also different [122], which explains why Ca2+ and Mg2+ produce distinct conformational changes in a protein.
The Ca2+-binding sites in calmodulin are called “EF-hand” motifs. The EF-hands are helix–loop–helix binding motifs and consist of residues at positions 1 (+x), 3 (+y), 5 (+z), 7 (−y), 9 (−x), and 12 (−z), which are arranged in a pentagonal bipyramid, allowing for the coordination of metal cations [123]. Studies with “EF-hand”-containing proteins have established two distinct types of Ca2+-binding sites. The first type, the specific Ca2+ sites, typically bind Ca2+ in the presence of millimolar Mg2+. The second, the Ca2+/Mg2+ sites bind both Ca2+ and Mg2+ and Ca2+-binding at micromolar concentration is usually not detected in the presence of millimolar Mg2+. It has been shown that Mg2+ may be an important factor in modulating the Ca2+ sensitivity of proteins, particularly switching off Ca2+-regulated systems at resting cellular Ca2+ levels [121]. It is, therefore, likely that the Ca2+/Mg2+ sites in CRT do not buffer significant Ca2+ at resting ER Ca2+ levels but may be activated during Ca2+ influx into the ER. Consistent with that suggestion is our observation that CRT binds only 1 mole of Ca2+ per mole of CRT in the presence of millimolar Mg2+ [38,39]. This has also been observed by others [81]. This is also consistent with a report by Van de Putt, who reported that CRT could only be responsible for the binding of 3–4% of the total Ca2+ stored in the ERs of pancreatic acinar cells [124].
Within the prevailing ER Zn2+ concentrations, CRT is unlikely to bind appreciable amounts of Zn2+. However, it is possible that the binding of CRT to ER proteins could drastically influence the affinity of Ca2+, and possibly Zn2+, as has been observed for the Ca2+-binding protein annexin A2 [125]. In this example, annexin A2 binds Ca2+, with a millimolar Kd value, but micromolar concentrations are required for the Ca2+-dependent aggregation of chromaffin granules by annexin A2.
The functional significance of multiple cation-binding sites has been addressed by Li et al. [67]. They suggest that CRT may have the intrinsic ability to display two distinct metal-dependent chaperone functions: a high-affinity Ca2+-dependent lectin function or a more classical low-affinity Zn2+-dependent chaperone function.

6. Calreticulin Functions: From the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Extracellular Surface

Since the discovery of CRT [37,38], CRT has been shown to be a multifunctional protein involved in over 40 intra- and extracellular processes in mammalian cells [126,127]. The established binding partners for CRT are presented in Table 2.
Key intracellular functions include roles in Ca2+ signaling and Ca2+ storage [128,129,130], a role in MHC class I assembly [131,132], and a role as a chaperone that functions to promote the correct folding of newly synthesized proteins in the ER [58,115,129,133]. CRT is also present in the cytoplasm, where it serves to shuttle specific proteins between the ER and Golgi apparatus [115], and in the nucleus, where it mediates the export of many nuclear receptors, such as the glucocorticoid receptor [134,135]. Chemotherapeutic agents, such as anthracyclines and oxaliplatin, provoke CRT translocation to the extracellular surface [92,136]. Extracellular CRT is a part of a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) complex, which plays a role in the phagocytic response [137,138]. However, CD47, ubiquitously expressed in normal tissue, is highly expressed by a wide range of cancer cells [139] and blocks the phagocytosis of CRT-expressing cancer cells. The proposed functions for CRT are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Calreticulin functions.
Table 3. Calreticulin functions.
FunctionReferences
Protein Folding[58,63,64,115,133]
Calcium Homeostasis[124,140,141,142]
Cell Adhesion[99,111,143,144,145]
Wound Healing[146,147]
Phagocytosis[107,138,148,149]
Immunogenic Cell Death[148,150,151,152]
RNA Stability[153,154]
Plasminogen Receptor[155]
Listed are the well-documented functions of CRT.
Studies with CRT-null mice have shown that the loss of CRT is embryonically lethal [156,157,158]. Dedhar’s group initially reported that CRT-null mice die in utero on days 14–14.5, primarily because of defects in cardiac morphogenesis [158]. This was confirmed by Michalak [156]. Dedhar further reported that CRT is not essential during the early stages of embryonic development but is important for the development of the heart and brain and for ventral body wall closure [145]. Dedhar has suggested that the reported abnormalities caused by the deletion of CRT to be because of the role of CRT in the modulation of cellular Ca2+ signaling [145]. Similarly, mice that overexpress cardiac CRT show severe cardiac pathology and sudden death [159].

6.1. CRT and Ca2+ Homeostasis

The ER is crucial for Ca2+ storage and intracellular Ca2+-mediated signaling [160,161], and its dysregulation in diseases has been thoroughly reviewed [162,163,164]. The dysregulation of Ca2+ homeostasis is an important feature in cancer development (reviewed in [165]). The ER maintains a steep Ca2+ gradient between its lumen (from 100 μM up to 1 mM [Ca2+]) and cytosol (~100 μM [Ca2+]) [166,167] through various influx mechanisms, e.g., the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase pump (SERCA) [168], and various efflux mechanisms, e.g., inositol 1,4,5 triphosphate [169], ryanodine receptors [170,171], and Sec61 translocation [172]. Ca2+ buffering is maintained by several proteins, including CRT [20,82], through its negatively charged C-domain; BiP/Grp78 [173,174]; and Grp94 [16,26], which binds Ca2+ at both high- and low-affinity sites.
ER Ca2+ stores are replenished by Ca2+-release-activated Ca2+ channels (CRACs), stromal interacting molecules (STIMs) [175,176], and calcium-release-activated calcium channel protein 1 (ORAI1) proteins [177,178,179]. STIM proteins transmit the Ca2+-storage-depletion message to the plasma membrane and participate in the refilling of the ER by physically interacting with the ORAI1 Ca2+ channels at the plasma membrane. A decrease in luminal-ER Ca2+ promotes conformational changes in the STIM1 via its ER luminal Ca2+-binding sites, resulting in oligomerization and the activation of ORAI1 channels and the formation of STIM1-ORAI1 membrane clusters [180]. The resultant influx of Ca2+ allows the filling of the ER by the SERCA pump. The oxidizing environment in the ER can activate the STIM1 and is also important for forming disulfide bonds in proteins and protein folding [181,182,183,184].
Along with CRT, BiP/GRP78 [173] and GRP94 [26] play crucial roles in Ca2+ storage and buffering. GRP94 undergoes conformational changes in response to Ca2+ binding, affecting its chaperone function [185]. BiP/GRP78 contains an ATPase site, and its Ca2+-binding properties are influenced by its interaction with ATP and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) [174].
Liu et al. were the first to propose a direct relationship between CRT and Ca2+ storage capacity [140]. In that study, the expression of CRT was inhibited by antisense RNA, and IP3-dependent Ca2+ transients were significantly reduced [140]. Subsequently, it was shown that overexpression of CRT inhibited repetitive IP3-induced Ca2+ waves. Deletion mutagenesis demonstrated that CRT inhibition of these waves was mediated by the high-affinity Ca2+ site [128]. Subsequently, in an elaborate series of experiments, Bastianutto et al. [141] transfected HeLa cells with an approximately 3.5-fold overexpression of CRT and observed that CRT participated in Ca2+ buffering within the IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores and contributed to about 45% of these stores. They also made several fundamental observations, including that the free Ca2+ within the lumen of the IP3-sensitive stores was in the millimolar range and that Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane, activated by depletion of the stores, was directly dependent on the ER lumenal Ca2+ concentration. Overexpression of CRT was also shown to inhibit repetitive IP3-induced Ca2+ waves [128]. Mery et al. [186] overexpressed CRT by 1.6-fold in fibroblasts, observed a 2-fold increase in cellular Ca2+, and demonstrated that 80% of the increased Ca2+ content was found within thapsigargin-sensitive Ca2+ stores. IP3 causes Ca2+ release, resulting in oscillations and waves in Xenopus laevis. These oscillations result from the opening of the IP3-bound IP3 receptor, which is activated by low Ca2+ concentrations but inhibited by high Ca2+ concentrations. The SERCA pump can remove the inhibitory effect of a high cytosolic Ca2+ concentration on the IP3 receptor by pumping cytosolic Ca2+ into the ER. John et al. [187] observed that CRT interacted with the C-terminus of SERCA and regulated its activity. CRT was also reported to regulate IP3-mediated Ca2+ release and capacitative Ca2+ entry in HeLa cells [188], consistent with the Xenopus studies. Furthermore, Xu et al. [189] showed that the C-domain of CRT mediated the ability of CRT to reduce increases in cytosolic Ca2+ because of Ca2+ influx and for CRT to attenuate the InsP3-induced decline in the free-Ca2+ concentration within the ER lumen.
Kwon et al. [142] showed that CRT is associated with the integrin cytoplasmic domain and mediated the coupling between the Ca2+ release and Ca2+ influx (Figure 4). They suggested that CRT served as a cytosolic integrin activator and a signal transducer between integrins and Ca2+ channels on the cell surface (Figure 4). Coppolino et al. [145] showed that the resting cytosolic Ca2+ levels in wildtype and CRT-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts were similar, and the cytosolic Ca2+ transient elicited by the addition of thapsigargin to cells, which is a measure of the Ca2+ stored in the ER, was indistinguishable. However, they did observe that the absence of CRT perturbed the integrin-mediated influx of extracellular Ca2+ (Figure 4). They suggested that the proposed role of CRT in ER Ca2+ storage was not essential. Similarly, as discussed, Van de Putt reported that CRT could only be responsible for the binding of 3–4% of the total Ca2+ stored in the ERs of pancreatic acinar cells [124].
Michalak used CRT-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts to further explore the role of CRT as a regulator of Ca2+ homeostasis. They reported that the ERs of CRT-null fibroblasts have a lower capacity for Ca2+ storage, although the free ER luminal Ca2+ concentration was unchanged. CRT-null cells showed an inhibited Ca2+ release in response to agonist stimulation by bradykinin; however, IP3-dependent release was unchanged [129]. In contrast, fibroblasts from CRT-null mice showed no differences in ER Ca2+ storage from wildtype cells [145]. Recent studies have shown that the CRT function in ER Ca2+ storage is because of its regulation of PDI. Upon Ca2+ depletion, the reductive power of the cochaperone, ERdJ5, increases in part because of the sequestration of the oxidizing protein PDI. This reductive power is required to activate SERCA. Therefore, the CRT-PDI complex prevents the oxidation of ERdJ5, which regulates Ca2+ influx by reducing the disulfide bonds of SERCA, thereby activating SERCA, which pumps Ca2+ into the ER [78,190].

6.2. CRT and Integrin Binding

CRT plays a multidimensional role in integrin binding and function, directly affecting several cellular processes important for cancer progression, such as adhesion and metastasis. Early studies using CRT-null embryonic fibroblasts showed that integrin-mediated adhesion is drastically impaired despite normal integrin expression in these cells [145]. CRT is associated with the cytoplasmic domain of α-subunits of integrins (Figure 4) [96,191]. CRT interacts with the KXGFFKR sequence in the C-domain of the integrin α-subunit [96], which is crucial for maintaining the activation state of integrin and promoting integrin-mediated interaction with the extracellular matrix (ECM). Consistently, CRT-deficient fibroblasts and embryonic stem cells have impaired integrin-mediated adhesion to the ECM.

6.3. CRT Chaperone Function

Helenus originally proposed a model to explain how N-linked oligosaccharides affect glycoprotein folding in the ER [192]. Since then, the model has been extended (reviewed in [193]). Essentially, nascent polypeptide chains of the secretory pathway are translocated into the lumen of the ER, where they are rapidly N-glycosylated with Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 on asparagine residues in Asn-X-Ser/Thr motifs. Glucosidases then act on the polypeptide chain, and the monoglucosylated polypeptide chain specifically binds to the CRT (or calnexin) in the ER lumen. The nascent protein bound to CRT interacts with other chaperones to promote proper folding. The three key chaperones that interact with CRT are the oxidoreductase ERp57; its homologous relative, ERp29 [74]; and the peptidyl–prolyl cis/trans isomerase, CyB [80]. The glucose and three adjacent mannose residues form a carbohydrate recognition site for CRT. The remaining glucose is released by glucosidases, which release the polypeptide chain from CRT. Glycoproteins that are not properly folded can then be reglucosylated by the folding sensor of UDP-Glc, namely, the glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (UGGT), thereby redirecting them back to CRT binding or trimming by glucosidase II. Polypeptide chains that are correctly folded are trimmed by mannosidases and directed for trafficking out of the ER. Proteins that are terminally misfolded are trimmed by mannosidases and directed for proteolysis. High-affinity Ca2+ binding by CRT is required for nucleotide binding and chaperone stabilization [194]. As discussed, the N-terminal domain contains sites for binding to carbohydrates located on the polypeptide chain and regulatory co-factors, such as ATP and Ca2+.
CypB is associated with the P-domain of CRT at a site that appears to overlap with the ERp57-binding site [56]. The interaction of CRT with ERp57 is Ca2+ dependent, although a Zn2+-dependent binding was also suggested [76]. Crystallographic analysis has confirmed the interactions of ERp29, ERp57, and CypB with unique sites in the P-domain of CRT [195]. They showed that the ERp29-binding site was alpha-helical, while the CypB site was primarily composed of loops, and the ERp57 site was composed of one alpha-helix and two loops.
Corbett et al. have proposed a model to examine the Ca2+ dependence of CRT/chaperone association [77,196]. At low Ca2+ concentrations, CRT is associated with both protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) and ERp57 but not with the carbohydrates of newly synthesized glycoproteins. When Ca2+ is taken up by SERCA and the ER lumenal concentration is increased above 400 μm, Ca2+ binds to the C-domain of calreticulin, and the CRT dissociates from the PDI. Newly synthesized glycoproteins can now associate with calreticulin, and the formation of CRT-ERp57 complexes is enhanced, allowing accelerated chaperoning of glycoproteins.

6.4. CRT in MHC Class I Assembly and Antigen Presentation

MHC class I (MHC I) peptide loading and assembly are typically seen in virally infected cells and tumor cells. This process further mediates the immune recognition of virally infected target and cancer cells by cytotoxic T-cells and natural killer (NK) cells for subsequent killing. The assembly, peptide loading, and transport of MHC I is a complex process and involves multiple steps mediated by the peptide-loading complex (PLC). CRT is one of the components of the PLC, which includes other proteins, such as tapasin and Erp57, and transporters associated with antigen processing (TAP) (Figure 4) [197].
The assembly of MHC I begins in the ER, where newly synthesized MHC I heavy chains are associated with calnexin [198]. This is followed by binding the heavy chains to β2-microglobulin (β2m) to form a heterodimer. Subsequently, this heterodimer is loaded onto the PLC. The peptides to be loaded onto MHC I are generated in the cytosol by the proteasome. They are transported to the ER lumen and then to the PLC via the TAP protein. Once in the lumen, the N-extended peptides are cleaved by ER aminopeptidase (ERAAP) to optimize their length for effective binding to MHC I [199]. Tapasin then plays a key role in peptide loading onto MHC I. Tapasin plays a role as the MHC I editor of the PLC and can stabilize the empty MHC I heterodimer and promote the peptide loading of MHC I [200]. Overall, the PLC is crucial for every assembly step and ensures that only high-affinity peptides are loaded onto MHC I. Once the peptide is loaded, the MHC I–peptide complex dissociates from TAP and is transported from the ER to the cell surface via the Golgi apparatus and vesicles [201].
The multiple functions of CRT and their individual structural domains in MHC I assembly and transport have been elucidated using CRT-null fibroblasts [132]. Many studies have shown that a deficiency of CRT in cells results in reduced expression of MHC I on the cell surface. The reconstitution of wildtype CRT in CRT-deficient cells restored the cell surface expression of MHC I [132]. However, the CRT MPN C-terminal mutants failed to restore the expression of the surface’s MHC I [202], the functional liabilities of which are described later. Similarly, both the NP- and P-domains failed to rescue the expression of the surface’s MHC I in CRT-deficient cells and further suppressed the cell surface’s MHC I [203]. In the absence of CRT, the PLC does not function effectively, resulting in MHC I molecules binding to low-affinity peptides [202]. The globular domain of CRT utilizes ATP to release MHC I from the PLC. Briefly, the interaction of ATP and CRT destabilizes the globular domain of CRT, which further releases MHC I [194].
Those studies suggest that CRT is involved in the later stages of MHC I assembly. It acts as a chaperone, binds to partially folded MHC I heavy chains via the glycan in MHC I [63,131,204], stabilizes them, and prevents degradation. The association of CRT with the initial TAP–tapasin complex results in the loss of calnexin from the complex [198]. CRT facilitates the incorporation of the MHC I-β2m heterodimer into the peptide-loading complex. It interacts with other proteins, such as tapasin and Erp57, to further stabilize the complex [205,206]. CRT also retains incompletely loaded MHC I in the ER and, thus, acts as a quality control protein, preventing the transport of unloaded MHC I to the plasma membrane (Figure 4) [207]. Those studies collectively demonstrated the vital roles of CRT in MHC I assembly, peptide loading, and quality control for antigen presentation. This is summarized in Figure 4.

6.5. CRT in Immunogenic Cell Death

CRT plays multiple roles in the phagocytosis of various cells, ranging from bacteria to cancer cells and aging neutrophils. It interacts with multiple cell types via several receptors and proteins and, thus, plays crucial roles in immunosurveillance, cancer cell clearance, and cellular homeostasis. CRT was initially shown to bind to C1q and mannan-binding protein on the cell surface [105]. Subsequently, it was shown that the CRT-C1q interaction is involved in the C1q-bridging function, which plays a key role in phagocytosis [208,209]. In addition, it has been proposed that the acidic C-domain of CRT anchors it to exposed phosphatidylserine on the surface of apoptotic cells via Ca2+-phosphatidylserine-bridged interactions. The arm-like P-domain of CRT is proposed to interact with receptors on the phagocyte, such as low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 1 or C1q, allowing CRT to function as a prophagocytic signal and promote the uptake of the dying cell [87].
Studies have shown that CRT is secreted by activated microglia, which then bind to and decorate E. coli, which mediates their phagocytosis by microglial cells [210]. Because antibodies and other opsonins, such as complement proteins, do not cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB), CRT released by the local microglial cells acts as a local opsonin and plays a crucial role in limiting infections in the brain. That study, therefore, showed that the microglia secrete CRT in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatments (Figure 5).
The role of CRT as an “eat-me” signal was first established in fibroblasts and cancer cells [138,148]. Those studies were the first to show that CRT is exposed on the surfaces of apoptotic fibroblasts, neutrophils, and Jurkat T-cells. CRT binds phosphatidylserine on apoptotic cells, which initiates phagocytosis by phagocytic cells, such as macrophages [138]. Furthermore, CRT exposed on the surface of apoptotic cells interacts with low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) in the phagocyte to mediate engulfment. In a subsequent study, Obeid et al. showed that CRT is rapidly transported to the cell surface in pre-apoptotic anthracycline-treated cancer cells. The cell surface’s CRT was later shown to be essential for the engulfment of the cancer cells by dendritic cells (DCs) to elicit an immune response (Figure 5B). This process, which causes cancer cell death by generating an immune response, is known as immunogenic cell death (ICD) [148]. Those studies showed, for the first time, the importance of the cell surface’s CRT in mediating the engulfment of cancer cells by phagocytes, such as DCs, and the anticancer immune response, or ICD, in vivo. In this case, the transport of CRT to the cell surface was inhibited by the depletion of ERp57, a molecular chaperone for CRT, and co-localized with CRT at the plasma membrane. ERp57, however, does not possess immunogenic properties [211,212].
Research by Panaretakis et al., in 2009, elucidated the mechanisms underlying pre-apoptotic CRT exposure in ICD [136]. They showed that three distinct signaling pathways, namely, ER stress with eIF2α phosphorylation, apoptosis-associated caspase-8 activation, and ER-to-Golgi secretion, worked concertedly to promote the SNARE-dependent exocytosis of CRT-containing vesicles. Interestingly, only ICD inducers activated all three pathways simultaneously. Further studies have shown that apart from chemotherapeutics, such as anthracyclines and oxaliplatin, radiation, photodynamic therapy, and oncolytic viruses are also effective in CRT cell-surface exposure and promoting antitumor immunity [213,214,215].
The role of CRT as an ICD inducer has an important clinical significance. Several studies in multiple cancers have shown that CRT exposure can predict the efficacy of anticancer therapies and patient outcomes [216,217,218]. Clinical monitoring of intratumoral and plasma levels of CRT has significant potential to predict the efficacy of immune-checkpoint-inhibitor therapies (ICI) and other chemotherapies. Imaging techniques targeting the cell surface (ecto-CRT) have been developed for early ICD detection and treatment response prediction in cancer patients [219].
CRT is a central player in macrophage-mediated programmed cell removal (PrCR). During cellular homeostasis, PCR is vital for removing unwanted, damaged, dysfunctional, and aged cells. Studies by Feng et al. showed that activated macrophages secrete CRT, which is bound on the surfaces of both viable and apoptotic neutrophils via asialoglycans. This further initiates their removal, thus contributing to reduced inflammation and the maintenance of tissue homeostasis [220].
In summary, the roles of the cell surface’s CRT in cell death and removal have implications for biological processes, such as cancer surveillance and neutrophil clearance (in both resolving inflammation and wound healing). This opens up potential therapeutic opportunities in wound healing and cancer treatment.

7. Calreticulin Mutants and Cancer: Impacts on Biological Functions

Essential thrombocytosis (ET) belongs to a sub-category of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) characterized by increased circulating platelets. Thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications are frequent in patients with ET, and their most significant health risk is an increased risk of developing blood clots [221,222,223,224]. It has been reported that ET patients have significant hypofibrinolysis and exhibit a 34% longer clot lysis time than matched controls [225]. Those studies presented the possibility that diminished plasmin generation could account for the hypofibrinolysis observed in patients with ET.
An appreciation of the significance of the role of hypofibrinolysis requires an understanding of the plasminogen/plasmin system. Plasminogen is an important blood protein and zymogen of the protease plasmin. Plasminogen activators, such as the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), are secreted by cells and convert plasminogen to plasmin. This activation results from the cleavage of an Arg561-Val562 peptide bond within the plasminogen, giving rise to the active protease, plasmin. Plasmin cleaves fibrin, the major component of blood clots and certain extracellular matrix proteins (reviewed in [226,227,228]). The role of plasmin in maintaining blood patency is well established, and the dysfunction of the plasmin fibrinolytic system has been linked to heart attacks and strokes [227,229,230]. The ability of the plasminogen activators to generate plasmin from plasminogen is minimal; however, when plasminogen is bound to cell-surface plasminogen receptors, this rate is drastically increased (reviewed in [231,232,233,234]). These plasminogen receptors play key roles in many physiological and pathological processes ranging from blood clot resolution to cancer invasion and metastasis and to host immunity [235].
Studies have found that mutations in three genes are responsible for ET. Specifically, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), thrombopoietin receptor (MPL), and CRT mutations are mutually exclusive and account for 50–60% and 40–50% of ET, respectively. Whole-exome sequencing has identified recurrent mutations in CRT in 70% of ET patients without a JAK2 or MPL mutation [236,237].
CRT mutations in MPN patients were first reported in 2013, exclusively in subjects presenting with ET and MF. Specifically, in patients with wildtype JAK2, 70–84% had CRT mutations. Furthermore, this first study identified 148 CRT mutations with 19 distinct variations. The CRT mutations were localized to exon 9 and caused a +1 frameshift, resulting in a modified C-terminus of CALR. This frameshift causes either a 52 bp deletion (Type I) or a 4 bp insertion (Type II), which results in a highly positively charged C-terminus region compared to the negatively charged amino acids in the CRT wildtype protein. These mutations were observed in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the ER, with no significant accumulation in the Golgi apparatus or at the cell surface. These and other studies have also reported that although patients with CRT mutations had higher numbers of platelets and lower leukocyte cell counts and hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, they also had a lower risk for thrombosis compared to the patients with JAK2 mutations [236,237,238,239,240]. Interestingly, thrombosis-free survival was significantly longer in patients harboring CRT mutations than in those with JAK2 or MPL mutations [240]. In healthy individuals, thrombopoietin (TPO) is an important cytokine/growth factor that promotes the proliferation and differentiation of megakaryocytes by binding to its cell surface receptor MPL via JAK-STAT signaling (Figure 4). In MPN patients, CRT binds and activates MPL independent of TPO, resulting in the constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway [241,242,243,244].
CRT has been suggested to play a role in the thrombotic process through multiple mechanisms, such as platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and modulation of the coagulation factors. The first reference to CRT and thrombosis was made by Kuwabara et al., who observed that wildtype CRT interacted with the endothelial layer and stimulated the release of nitric oxide, which prevented clot formation in experimentally induced coronary thrombosis in a canine model of acute arterial occlusion. Moreover, they also showed that CRT is bound to coagulation factor IX/IXa via its C-terminal region [245]. Still, it did not impact the coagulation activity of these proteins. In a subsequent study using rat models of endothelial injury in iliofemoral arteries, it was demonstrated that wildtype CRT inhibited intimal hyperplasia, reduced plaque growth, and inhibited platelet activation, potentially as a consequence of binding and interacting with factors IX and X and prothrombin. Because CRT is a Ca2+-binding protein, it may chelate the Ca2+ required by the coagulation factors for clotting activity at the sites of endothelial injury [246].
Most recently, we discovered that CRT functions as a plasminogen-binding receptor that greatly stimulates the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin [155]. Because a link between fibrinolysis defects in patients expressing CRT mutations was noted, we examined the possibility that CRT might be a plasminogen receptor that directly regulated plasmin production. Most importantly, we have observed that the two major CRT mutants, CRTdel52 and CRTins5, possessed about 40% of the plasmin-generating activity of the wildtype CRT [155]. Next, we utilized mouse embryonic fibroblasts obtained from wildtype embryos (K41) and CRT-knockout embryos (K42) to examine cellular plasmin production [129]. When we incubated K41 and K42 embryonic fibroblasts with plasminogen and measured the plasmin generation, we observed that the K42 fibroblasts displayed a drastic 90% loss in plasmin generation compared to that of the K41 fibroblasts. Our results suggest that CRT is an important cellular plasminogen regulatory protein that may contribute to the defect in clot lysis observed in ET patients. The precise mechanism of how the loss of plasmin activity impacts thrombosis in patients with CRT mutations is a focus of future investigations. However, this is the first time a protein in the plasminogen activation pathway, also known as a plasminogen receptor, has been shown to be involved in MPNs.
The CRT mutants associated with MPNs are shown to interfere with ICD and antitumor immune responses, as well as Ca2+-binding (calcium homeostasis) and antitumor immune responses. Several lines of evidence have suggested this. First, because of an altered C-terminal amino acid sequence and the loss of the KDEL sequence, CRT MPN mutants are secreted from cells. This results in the binding and saturation of the CRT receptors on the surfaces of phagocytic cells (DCs), which prevent them from recognizing the cell-surface CRT on dying cancer cells [247,248]. This event dampens the antitumor immune response mediated by chemotherapy or the PD-1 blockade. Those studies highlighted the potential mechanisms of cancer cells’ immune evasion and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies in MPNs. The CRT mutants can further affect immune evasion in MPNs by decreasing the MHC class I processing and antigen presentation. They do so by compromising MHC class I’s binding to the PLC, which is crucial for MHC class I processing and antigen presentation. As described above, wildtype CRT is associated with MHC class I via a conserved glycan in the MHC I protein. This association further recruits MHC I in the PLC. Although CRT mutants continue associating with MHC I via the glycan-binding region, they do not possess the peptide loading function necessary for MHC class I processing [202]. This is potentially because of the low levels of CRT mutants in the ER, as most CRT is likely secreted. The mutants form a transient association with the PLC, but the low ER levels reduce the efficiency of the loading of MHC class I onto the complex. This ultimately leads to poor peptide-loaded MHC class I expression on the cell surface. The reduced MHC class I processing and impaired antigen presentation hinder CRT mutant MPN cells from being killed by cytotoxic T-cells. The loss of ER CRT could further limit the ability of the immune system to recognize and eliminate the MPN mutant cells, resulting in disease progression. Furthermore, there is evidence of MHC class I allele skewing in MPN patients with CRT mutants. This predominantly manifests as an underrepresentation of alleles, which can effectively present CRT mutant neoepitopes [249]. Because the C-domain of wildtype CRT is crucial for Ca2+ binding, disruption of this domain in the CRT MPN Type I and Type II mutants negatively impacts Ca2+ binding. These effects on Ca2+-binding are more pronounced in Type I mutations, as they eliminate all negatively charged amino acids in the C-terminus. In contrast, Type II eliminates only 50% of the negatively charged groups. Studies by Ibarra et al. have characterized the differences in the Ca2+-binding properties and the unfolded-protein responses (UPRs) and pathogenic outcomes between these two groups of mutations. They demonstrated that Type I CALR mutations, unlike Type II, significantly impair Ca2+ binding, leading to ER stress and the activation of the IRE1α/XBP1 pathway. This creates a specific vulnerability in Type I CALR-mutated MPNs that could be exploited for targeted therapy for MPNs [250].

8. Conclusions

This review highlights the massive contributions of many laboratories that have formed the framework of our understanding of the structure and function of CRT. A timeline of these discoveries is presented in Figure 6. This review was necessitated because most of the incremental advances in CRT research and the credit to the laboratories that contributed to those advances had been marginalized by the plethora of review articles written about CRT. Therefore, the authors of this review have painstakingly reviewed the literature and attempted to assign credit to the laboratories that have advanced the CRT field. We apologize to any researchers whose contributions have been omitted and welcome the opportunity to include those discoveries as an addendum.
We have also addressed the controversy concerning the discovery of CRT and shown that CRT was initially discovered as the Ca2+-binding ER protein calregulin and not as the SR protein(s) called the HACBP. The evidence clearly shows that the HACBP was likely a mixture of several SR proteins, of which more than 90% were the 53 kDa glycoprotein. Other evidence, including the lack of Stains-all staining and the distinct Ca2+-binding properties exhibited by the HACBP, has relegated the HACBP to the cults of antiquity.
Since the discovery of the renaming of calregulin to CRT, there has been an explosion of exciting discoveries. Within the cell, CRT has been shown to play important roles as a Ca2+ buffer and a chaperone. CRT also plays a number of roles in cancer biology. On the surface of cancer cells, CRT plays the role of an “eat-me” signal for the activation of phagocytosis. CRT is upregulated in many cancers and has been suggested to influence cell proliferation as well as migration and invasion. The recently discovered role of CRT as a plasminogen receptor may provide a link between CRT and invasion. CRT may be a diagnostic marker and a therapeutic target for cancer. CRT mutations associated with MPNs markedly differ in many functionalities, such as phagocytosis, ICD, and calcium binding, compared to those of the wildtype CRT. These alterations impact the development and progression of MPNs. The future holds much promise for clarifying the roles of CRT in cancer and elucidating potentially new roles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.C.O., A.G.B. and D.M.W.; original draft preparation, D.M.W.; writing—review and editing, G.C.O., A.G.B. and D.M.W.; funding acquisition, D.M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Canadian Cancer Society and the J.D. Irving, Ltd., Excellence in Cancer Research Fund (grant #707176).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fliegel, L.; Burns, K.; MacLennan, D.H.; Reithmeier, R.A.; Michalak, M. Molecular Cloning of the High Affinity Calcium-Binding Protein (Calreticulin) of Skeletal Muscle Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 21522–21528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Okura, G.C.; Bharadwaj, A.G.; Waisman, D.M. Calreticulin-Enigmatic Discovery. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Michalak, M.; Campbell, K.P.; MacLennan, D.H. Localization of the High Affinity Calcium Binding Protein and an Intrinsic Glycoprotein in Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Campbell, K.P.; MacLennan, D.H. Purification and Characterization of the 53,000-Dalton Glycoprotein from the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 4626–4632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Campbell, K.P. Protein Components and Their Roles in Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Function. In Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in Muscle Physiology; Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in Muscle Physiology; CRC-Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1986; Volume 1, pp. 65–99. ISBN 978-0-8493-6181-4. [Google Scholar]
  6. MacLennan, D.H.; Ostwald, T.J.; Stewart, P.S. Structural Components of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Membrane. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1974, 227, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ostwald, T.J.; MacLennan, D.H. Isolation of a High Affinity Calcium-Binding Protein from Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. MacLennan, D.H. Purification and Properties of an Adenosine Triphosphatase from Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1970, 245, 4508–4518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Weber, K.; Osborn, M. The Reliability of Molecular Weight Determinations by Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. J. Biol. Chem. 1969, 244, 4406–4412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. MacLennan, D.; Klip, A.; Reithmeier, R.; Michalak, M.; Campbell, K. Possible Sites of Ion Flow in the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Membrane. In Membrane Bioenergetics; Addison-Wesley Publishing Company: Boston, MA, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  11. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Campbell, K.P.; Franzini-Armstrong, C.; Shamoo, A.E. Further Characterization of Light and Heavy Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Vesicles. Identification of the ‘Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Feet’ Associated with Heavy Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA—Biomembr. 1980, 602, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ostwald, T.J.; MacLennan, D.H.; Dorrington, K.J. Effects of Cation Binding on the Conformation of Calsequestrin and the High Affinity Calcium-Binding Protein of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 5867–5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. MacLennan, D.H.; Yip, C.C.; Iles, G.H.; Seeman, P. Isolation of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1973, 37, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. MacLennan, D.H.; Wong, P.T. Isolation of a Calcium-Sequestering Protein from Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1971, 68, 1231–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Van, P.N.; Peter, F.; Söling, H.D. Four Intracisternal Calcium-Binding Glycoproteins from Rat Liver Microsomes with High Affinity for Calcium. No Indication for Calsequestrin-like Proteins in Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate-Sensitive Calcium Sequestering Rat Liver Vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 17494–17501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Campbell, K.P.; MacLennan, D.H.; Jorgensen, A.O. Staining of the Ca2+-Binding Proteins, Calsequestrin, Calmodulin, Troponin C, and S-100, with the Cationic Carbocyanine Dye “Stains-All”. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 11267–11273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Khanna, N.C.; Tokuda, M.; Waisman, D.M. Calregulin: Purification, Cellular Localization, and Tissue Distribution. Methods Enzym. 1987, 139, 36–50. [Google Scholar]
  19. Baksh, S.; Burns, K.; Busaan, J.; Michalak, M. Expression and Purification of Recombinant and Native Calreticulin. Protein Expr. Purif. 1992, 3, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Treves, S.; De Mattei, M.; Landfredi, M.; Villa, A.; Green, N.M.; MacLennan, D.H.; Meldolesi, J.; Pozzan, T. Calreticulin Is a Candidate for a Calsequestrin-like Function in Ca2(+)-Storage Compartments (Calciosomes) of Liver and Brain. Biochem. J. 1990, 271, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Khanna, N.C.; Tokuda, M.; Waisman, D.M. Conformational Changes Induced by Binding of Divalent Cations to Calregulin. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 8883–8887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yuasa, K.; Maeshima, M. Equilibrium Dialysis Measurements of the Ca2+-Binding Properties of Recombinant Radish Vacuolar Ca2+-Binding Protein Expressed in Escherichia Coli. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002, 66, 2382–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Raeymaekers, L.; Verbist, J.; Wuytack, F.; Plessers, L.; Casteels, R. Expression of Ca2+ Binding Proteins of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum of Striated Muscle in the Endoplasmic Reticulum of Pig Smooth Muscles. Cell Calcium 1993, 14, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Campbell, K.P.; MacLennan, D.H. A Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase System from Skeletal Muscle Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. Phosphorylation of a 60,000-Dalton Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 1238–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Campbell, K.P.; MacLennan, D.H.; Jorgensen, A.O.; Mintzer, M.C. Purification and Characterization of Calsequestrin from Canine Cardiac Sarcoplasmic Reticulum and Identification of the 53,000 Dalton Glycoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 1197–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Macer, D.R.; Koch, G.L. Identification of a Set of Calcium-Binding Proteins in Reticuloplasm, the Luminal Content of the Endoplasmic Reticulum. J. Cell Sci. 1988, 91, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Damiani, E.; Spamer, C.; Heilmann, C.; Salvatori, S.; Margreth, A. Endoplasmic Reticulum of Rat Liver Contains Two Proteins Closely Related to Skeletal Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca-ATPase and Calsequestrin. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Leberer, E.; Charuk, J.H.; Green, N.M.; MacLennan, D.H. Molecular Cloning and Expression of cDNA Encoding a Lumenal Calcium Binding Glycoprotein from Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 6047–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hofmann, S.L.; Brown, M.S.; Lee, E.; Pathak, R.K.; Anderson, R.G.; Goldstein, J.L. Purification of a Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Protein That Binds Ca2+ and Plasma Lipoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 8260–8270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Leberer, E.; Timms, B.G.; Campbell, K.P.; MacLennan, D.H. Purification, Calcium Binding Properties, and Ultrastructural Localization of the 53,000- and 160,000 (Sarcalumenin)-Dalton Glycoproteins of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 10118–10124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cala, S.E.; Scott, B.T.; Jones, L.R. Intralumenal Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca(2+)-Binding Proteins. Semin. Cell Biol. 1990, 1, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Damiani, E.; Margreth, A. Subcellular Fractionation to Junctional Sarcoplasmic Reticulum and Biochemical Characterization of 170 kDa Ca(2+)- and Low-Density-Lipoprotein-Binding Protein in Rabbit Skeletal Muscle. Biochem. J. 1991, 277, 825–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Treves, S.; Vukcevic, M.; Maj, M.; Thurnheer, R.; Mosca, B.; Zorzato, F. Minor Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Membrane Components That Modulate Excitation–Contraction Coupling in Striated Muscles. J. Physiol. 2009, 587, 3071–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Staunton, L.; Ohlendieck, K. Mass Spectrometric Characterization of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum from Rabbit Skeletal Muscle by On-Membrane Digestion. Protein Pept. Lett. 2012, 19, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. MacLennan, D.H. Isolation of Proteins of the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. Methods Enzymol. 1974, 32, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fliegel, L.; Newton, E.; Burns, K.; Michalak, M. Molecular Cloning of cDNA Encoding a 55-kDa Multifunctional Thyroid Hormone Binding Protein of Skeletal Muscle Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 15496–15502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Waisman, D.M.; Smallwood, J.; Lafreniere, D.; Rasmussen, H. Identification of a Novel Hepatic Calcium Binding Protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1984, 119, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Waisman, D.M.; Salimath, B.P.; Anderson, M.J. Isolation and Characterization of CAB-63, a Novel Calcium- Binding Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 1652–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khanna, N.C.; Tokuda, M.; Waisman, D.M. Comparison of Calregulins from Vertebrate Livers. Biochem. J. 1987, 242, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Smith, M.J.; Koch, G.L. Multiple Zones in the Sequence of Calreticulin (CRP55, Calregulin, HACBP), a Major Calcium Binding ER/SR Protein. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 3581–3586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. McCauliffe, D.P.; Lux, F.A.; Lieu, T.S.; Sanz, I.; Hanke, J.; Newkirk, M.M.; Bachinski, L.L.; Itoh, Y.; Siciliano, M.J.; Reichlin, M. Molecular Cloning, Expression, and Chromosome 19 Localization of a Human Ro/SS-A Autoantigen. J. Clin. Investig. 1990, 85, 1379–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. McCauliffe, D.P.; Zappi, E.; Lieu, T.S.; Michalak, M.; Sontheimer, R.D.; Capra, J.D. A Human Ro/SS-A Autoantigen Is the Homologue of Calreticulin and Is Highly Homologous with Onchocercal RAL-1 Antigen and an Aplysia “Memory Molecule”. J. Clin. Investig. 1990, 86, 332–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. McCauliffe, D.P.; Yang, Y.S.; Wilson, J.; Sontheimer, R.D.; Capra, J.D. The 5’-Flanking Region of the Human Calreticulin Gene Shares Homology with the Human GRP78, GRP94, and Protein Disulfide Isomerase Promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 2557–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, L.; Lynch, J.; Nakamura, K.; Fliegel, L.; Kasahara, H.; Izumo, S.; Komuro, I.; Agellon, L.B.; Michalak, M. COUP-TF1 Antagonizes Nkx2.5-Mediated Activation of the Calreticulin Gene during Cardiac Development. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 2797–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lynch, J.; Guo, L.; Gelebart, P.; Chilibeck, K.; Xu, J.; Molkentin, J.D.; Agellon, L.B.; Michalak, M. Calreticulin Signals Upstream of Calcineurin and MEF2C in a Critical Ca(2+)-Dependent Signaling Cascade. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Qiu, Y.; Lynch, J.; Guo, L.; Yatsula, B.; Perkins, A.S.; Michalak, M. Regulation of the Calreticulin Gene by GATA6 and Evi-1 Transcription Factors. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 3697–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Qiu, Y.; Michalak, M. Transcriptional Control of the Calreticulin Gene in Health and Disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 41, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Waser, M.; Mesaeli, N.; Spencer, C.; Michalak, M. Regulation of Calreticulin Gene Expression by Calcium. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 138, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nguyen, T.O.; Capra, J.D.; Sontheimer, R.D. Calreticulin Is Transcriptionally Upregulated by Heat Shock, Calcium and Heavy Metals. Mol. Immunol. 1996, 33, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Llewellyn, D.H.; Kendall, J.M.; Sheikh, F.N.; Campbell, A.K. Induction of Calreticulin Expression in HeLa Cells by Depletion of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Store and Inhibition of N-Linked Glycosylation. Biochem. J. 1996, 318, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ní Fhlathartaigh, M.; McMahon, J.; Reynolds, R.; Connolly, D.; Higgins, E.; Counihan, T.; FitzGerald, U. Calreticulin and Other Components of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Rat and Human Inflammatory Demyelination. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2013, 1, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khanna, N.C.; Waisman, D.M. Development of a Radioimmunoassay for Quantitation of Calregulin in Bovine Tissues. Biochemistry 1986, 25, 1078–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Baksh, S.; Michalak, M. Expression of Calreticulin in Escherichia Coli and Identification of Its Ca2+ Binding Domains. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 21458–21465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Schrag, J.D.; Bergeron, J.J.; Li, Y.; Borisova, S.; Hahn, M.; Thomas, D.Y.; Cygler, M. The Structure of Calnexin, an ER Chaperone Involved in Quality Control of Protein Folding. Mol. Cell 2001, 8, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chouquet, A.; Païdassi, H.; Ling, W.L.; Frachet, P.; Houen, G.; Arlaud, G.J.; Gaboriaud, C. X-Ray Structure of the Human Calreticulin Globular Domain Reveals a Peptide-Binding Area and Suggests a Multi-Molecular Mechanism. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kozlov, G.; Pocanschi, C.L.; Rosenauer, A.; Bastos-Aristizabal, S.; Gorelik, A.; Williams, D.B.; Gehring, K. Structural Basis of Carbohydrate Recognition by Calreticulin. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 38612–38620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Baksh, S.; Spamer, C.; Heilmann, C.; Michalak, M. Identification of the Zn2+ Binding Region in Calreticulin. FEBS Lett. 1995, 376, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Saito, Y.; Ihara, Y.; Leach, M.R.; Cohen-Doyle, M.F.; Williams, D.B. Calreticulin Functions in Vitro as a Molecular Chaperone for Both Glycosylated and Non-Glycosylated Proteins. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 6718–6729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bharadwaj, A.; Bydoun, M.; Holloway, R.; Waisman, D. Annexin A2 Heterotetramer: Structure and Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 6259–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Maffey, K.G.; Keil, L.B.; DeBari, V.A. The Influence of Lipid Composition and Divalent Cations on Annexin V Binding to Phospholipid Mixtures. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2001, 31, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  61. Leach, M.R.; Cohen-Doyle, M.F.; Thomas, D.Y.; Williams, D.B. Localization of the Lectin, ERp57 Binding, and Polypeptide Binding Sites of Calnexin and Calreticulin. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 29686–29697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kapoor, M.; Ellgaard, L.; Gopalakrishnapai, J.; Schirra, C.; Gemma, E.; Oscarson, S.; Helenius, A.; Surolia, A. Mutational Analysis Provides Molecular Insight into the Carbohydrate-Binding Region of Calreticulin: Pivotal Roles of Tyrosine-109 and Aspartate-135 in Carbohydrate Recognition. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Peterson, J.R.; Ora, A.; Van, P.N.; Helenius, A. Transient, Lectin-like Association of Calreticulin with Folding Intermediates of Cellular and Viral Glycoproteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 1995, 6, 1173–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nair, S.; Wearsch, P.A.; Mitchell, D.A.; Wassenberg, J.J.; Gilboa, E.; Nicchitta, C.V. Calreticulin Displays in Vivo Peptide-Binding Activity and Can Elicit CTL Responses against Bound Peptides. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 6426–6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Vassilakos, A.; Michalak, M.; Lehrman, M.A.; Williams, D.B. Oligosaccharide Binding Characteristics of the Molecular Chaperones Calnexin and Calreticulin. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 3480–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rizvi, S.M.; Mancino, L.; Thammavongsa, V.; Cantley, R.L.; Raghavan, M. A Polypeptide Binding Conformation of Calreticulin Is Induced by Heat Shock, Calcium Depletion, or by Deletion of the C-Terminal Acidic Region. Mol. Cell 2004, 15, 913–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, Z.; Stafford, W.F.; Bouvier, M. The Metal Ion Binding Properties of Calreticulin Modulate Its Conformational Flexibility and Thermal Stability. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 11193–11201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lum, R.; Ahmad, S.; Hong, S.J.; Chapman, D.C.; Kozlov, G.; Williams, D.B. Contributions of the Lectin and Polypeptide Binding Sites of Calreticulin to Its Chaperone Functions in Vitro and in Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 19631–19641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Nigam, S.K.; Goldberg, A.L.; Ho, S.; Rohde, M.F.; Bush, K.T.; Sherman, M. A Set of Endoplasmic Reticulum Proteins Possessing Properties of Molecular Chaperones Includes Ca(2+)-Binding Proteins and Members of the Thioredoxin Superfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 1744–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Burns, K.; Duggan, B.; Atkinson, E.A.; Famulski, K.S.; Nemer, M.; Bleackley, R.C.; Michalak, M. Modulation of Gene Expression by Calreticulin Binding to the Glucocorticoid Receptor. Nature 1994, 367, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Michalak, M.; Burns, K.; Andrin, C.; Mesaeli, N.; Jass, G.H.; Busaan, J.L.; Opas, M. Endoplasmic Reticulum Form of Calreticulin Modulates Glucocorticoid-Sensitive Gene Expression. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 29436–29445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Walther, R.F.; Lamprecht, C.; Ridsdale, A.; Groulx, I.; Lee, S.; Lefebvre, Y.A.; Haché, R.J.G. Nuclear Export of the Glucocorticoid Receptor Is Accelerated by Cell Fusion-Dependent Release of Calreticulin. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 37858–37864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ellgaard, L.; Bettendorff, P.; Braun, D.; Herrmann, T.; Fiorito, F.; Jelesarov, I.; Güntert, P.; Helenius, A.; Wüthrich, K. NMR Structures of 36 and 73-Residue Fragments of the Calreticulin P-Domain. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 322, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sakono, M.; Seko, A.; Takeda, Y.; Ito, Y. PDI Family Protein ERp29 Forms 1:1 Complex with Lectin Chaperone Calreticulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 452, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kozlov, G.; Bastos-Aristizabal, S.; Määttänen, P.; Rosenauer, A.; Zheng, F.; Killikelly, A.; Trempe, J.-F.; Thomas, D.Y.; Gehring, K. Structural Basis of Cyclophilin B Binding by the Calnexin/Calreticulin P-Domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 35551–35557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Baksh, S.; Burns, K.; Andrin, C.; Michalak, M. Interaction of Calreticulin with Protein Disulfide Isomerase. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 31338–31344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Corbett, E.F.; Oikawa, K.; Francois, P.; Tessier, D.C.; Kay, C.; Bergeron, J.J.; Thomas, D.Y.; Krause, K.H.; Michalak, M. Ca2+ Regulation of Interactions between Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperones. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 6203–6211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Avezov, E.; Konno, T.; Zyryanova, A.; Chen, W.; Laine, R.; Crespillo-Casado, A.; Melo, E.P.; Ushioda, R.; Nagata, K.; Kaminski, C.F.; et al. Retarded PDI Diffusion and a Reductive Shift in Poise of the Calcium Depleted Endoplasmic Reticulum. BMC Biol. 2015, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ellgaard, L.; Riek, R.; Herrmann, T.; Güntert, P.; Braun, D.; Helenius, A.; Wüthrich, K. NMR Structure of the Calreticulin P-Domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 3133–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Frickel, E.-M.; Riek, R.; Jelesarov, I.; Helenius, A.; Wuthrich, K.; Ellgaard, L. TROSY-NMR Reveals Interaction between ERp57 and the Tip of the Calreticulin P-Domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 1954–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Wijeyesakere, S.J.; Gafni, A.A.; Raghavan, M. Calreticulin Is a Thermostable Protein with Distinct Structural Responses to Different Divalent Cation Environments. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 8771–8785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Damiani, E.; Heilmann, C.; Salvatori, S.; Margreth, A. Characterization of High-Capacity Low-Affinity Calcium Binding Protein of Liver Endoplasmic Reticulum: Calsequestrin-like and Divergent Properties. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1989, 165, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Villamil Giraldo, A.M.; Lopez Medus, M.; Gonzalez Lebrero, M.; Pagano, R.S.; Labriola, C.A.; Landolfo, L.; Delfino, J.M.; Parodi, A.J.; Caramelo, J.J. The Structure of Calreticulin C-Terminal Domain Is Modulated by Physiological Variations of Calcium Concentration. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 4544–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Munro, S.; Pelham, H.R.B. A C-Terminal Signal Prevents Secretion of Luminal ER Proteins. Cell 1987, 48, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sönnichsen, B.; Füllekrug, J.; Nguyen Van, P.; Diekmann, W.; Robinson, D.G.; Mieskes, G. Retention and Retrieval: Both Mechanisms Cooperate to Maintain Calreticulin in the Endoplasmic Reticulum. J. Cell Sci. 1994, 107, 2705–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Conte, I.L.; Keith, N.; Gutiérrez-Gonzalez, C.; Parodi, A.J.; Caramelo, J.J. The Interplay between Calcium and the in Vitro Lectin and Chaperone Activities of Calreticulin. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 4671–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wijeyesakere, S.J.; Bedi, S.K.; Huynh, D.; Raghavan, M. The C-Terminal Acidic Region of Calreticulin Mediates Phosphatidylserine Binding and Apoptotic Cell Phagocytosis. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 3896–3909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Stuart, G.R.; Lynch, N.J.; Day, A.J.; Schwaeble, W.J.; Sim, R.B. The C1q and Collectin Binding Site within C1q Receptor (Cell Surface Calreticulin). Immunopharmacology 1997, 38, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Stuart, G.R.; Lynch, N.J.; Lu, J.; Geick, A.; Moffatt, B.E.; Sim, R.B.; Schwaeble, W.J. Localisation of the C1q Binding Site within C1q Receptor/Calreticulin. FEBS Lett. 1996, 397, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Cheng, S.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Yang, Y.S.; Capra, J.D.; Sontheimer, R.D. Calreticulin Binds hYRNA and the 52-kDa Polypeptide Component of the Ro/SS-A Ribonucleoprotein Autoantigen. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 4484–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Kimura, T.; Imaishi, K.; Hagiwara, Y.; Horibe, T.; Hayano, T.; Takahashi, N.; Urade, R.; Kato, K.; Kikuchi, M. ERp57 Binds Competitively to Protein Disulfide Isomerase and Calreticulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 331, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Panaretakis, T.; Joza, N.; Modjtahedi, N.; Tesniere, A.; Vitale, I.; Durchschlag, M.; Fimia, G.M.; Kepp, O.; Piacentini, M.; Froehlich, K.-U.; et al. The Co-Translocation of ERp57 and Calreticulin Determines the Immunogenicity of Cell Death. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 1499–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fraser, S.A.; Karimi, R.; Michalak, M.; Hudig, D. Perforin Lytic Activity Is Controlled by Calreticulin. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 4150–4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Andrin, C.; Pinkoski, M.J.; Burns, K.; Atkinson, E.A.; Krahenbuhl, O.; Hudig, D.; Fraser, S.A.; Winkler, U.; Tschopp, J.; Opas, M.; et al. Interaction between a Ca2+-Binding Protein Calreticulin and Perforin, a Component of the Cytotoxic T-Cell Granules. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 10386–10394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fraser, S.A.; Michalak, M.; Welch, W.H.; Hudig, D. Calreticulin, a Component of the Endoplasmic Reticulum and of Cytotoxic Lymphocyte Granules, Regulates Perforin-Mediated Lysis in the Hemolytic Model System. Biochem. Cell Biol. Biochim. Biol. Cell. 1998, 76, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rojiani, M.V.; Finlay, B.B.; Gray, V.; Dedhar, S. In Vitro Interaction of a Polypeptide Homologous to Human Ro/SS-A Antigen (Calreticulin) with a Highly Conserved Amino Acid Sequence in the Cytoplasmic Domain of Integrin Alpha Subunits. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 9859–9866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Ohkuro, M.; Kim, J.-D.; Kuboi, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; Mizukami, H.; Kobayashi-Kuramochi, H.; Muramoto, K.; Shirato, M.; Michikawa-Tanaka, F.; Moriya, J.; et al. Calreticulin and Integrin Alpha Dissociation Induces Anti-Inflammatory Programming in Animal Models of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Vinaik, R.; Kozlov, G.; Gehring, K. Structure of the Non-Catalytic Domain of the Protein Disulfide Isomerase-Related Protein (PDIR) Reveals Function in Protein Binding. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. McDonnell, J.M.; Jones, G.E.; White, T.K.; Tanzer, M.L. Calreticulin Binding Affinity for Glycosylated Laminin. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 7891–7894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Thielmann, Y.; Weiergräber, O.H.; Mohrlüder, J.; Willbold, D. Structural Framework of the GABARAP-Calreticulin Interface--Implications for Substrate Binding to Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperones. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 1140–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mohrlüder, J.; Stangler, T.; Hoffmann, Y.; Wiesehan, K.; Mataruga, A.; Willbold, D. Identification of Calreticulin as a Ligand of GABARAP by Phage Display Screening of a Peptide Library. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 5543–5555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Bhattacharya, R.; Devi, M.S.; Dhople, V.M.; Jesudasan, R.A. A Mouse Protein That Localizes to Acrosome and Sperm Tail Is Regulated by Y-Chromosome. BMC Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, L.; Jiao, X.; D’Atri, I.; Ono, F.; Nelson, R.; Chan, C.-C.; Nakaya, N.; Ma, Z.; Ma, Y.; Cai, X.; et al. Mutation in the Intracellular Chloride Channel CLCC1 Associated with Autosomal Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Malhotra, R.; Willis, A.C.; Jensenius, J.C.; Jackson, J.; Sim, R.B. Structure and Homology of Human C1q Receptor (Collectin Receptor). Immunology 1993, 78, 341–348. [Google Scholar]
  105. Eggleton, P.; Lieu, T.S.; Zappi, E.G.; Sastry, K.; Coburn, J.; Zaner, K.S.; Sontheimer, R.D.; Capra, J.D.; Ghebrehiwet, B.; Tauber, A.I. Calreticulin Is Released from Activated Neutrophils and Binds to C1q and Mannan-Binding Protein. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1994, 72, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Wicker-Planquart, C.; Dufour, S.; Tacnet-Delorme, P.; Bally, I.; Delneste, Y.; Frachet, P.; Housset, D.; Thielens, N.M. Molecular and Cellular Interactions of Scavenger Receptor SR-F1 With Complement C1q Provide Insights Into Its Role in the Clearance of Apoptotic Cells. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ogden, C.A.; deCathelineau, A.; Hoffmann, P.R.; Bratton, D.; Ghebrehiwet, B.; Fadok, V.A.; Henson, P.M. C1q and Mannose Binding Lectin Engagement of Cell Surface Calreticulin and CD91 Initiates Macropinocytosis and Uptake of Apoptotic Cells. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194, 781–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Duus, K.; Pagh, R.T.; Holmskov, U.; Højrup, P.; Skov, S.; Houen, G. Interaction of Calreticulin with CD40 Ligand, TRAIL and Fas Ligand. Scand. J. Immunol. 2007, 66, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Orr, A.W.; Pedraza, C.E.; Pallero, M.A.; Elzie, C.A.; Goicoechea, S.; Strickland, D.K.; Murphy-Ullrich, J.E. Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor–Related Protein Is a Calreticulin Coreceptor That Signals Focal Adhesion Disassembly. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161, 1179–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Goicoechea, S.; Pallero, M.A.; Eggleton, P.; Michalak, M.; Murphy-Ullrich, J.E. The Anti-Adhesive Activity of Thrombospondin Is Mediated by the N-Terminal Domain of Cell Surface Calreticulin. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 37219–37228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Goicoechea, S.; Orr, A.W.; Pallero, M.A.; Eggleton, P.; Murphy-Ullrich, J.E. Thrombospondin Mediates Focal Adhesion Disassembly through Interactions with Cell Surface Calreticulin. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 36358–36368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kretsinger, R.H.; Nockolds, C.E. Carp Muscle Calcium-Binding Protein. II. Structure Determination and General Description. J. Biol. Chem. 1973, 248, 3313–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Filipenko, N.R.; Kang, H.M.; Waisman, D.M. Characterization of the Ca2+-Binding Sites of Annexin II Tetramer. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38877–38884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Madureira, P.A.; O’Connell, P.A.; Surette, A.P.; Miller, V.A.; Waisman, D.M. The Biochemistry and Regulation of S100A10: A Multifunctional Plasminogen Receptor Involved in Oncogenesis. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 353687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Williams, D.B. Beyond Lectins: The Calnexin/Calreticulin Chaperone System of the Endoplasmic Reticulum. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Samtleben, S.; Jaepel, J.; Fecher, C.; Andreska, T.; Rehberg, M.; Blum, R. Direct Imaging of ER Calcium with Targeted-Esterase Induced Dye Loading (TED). JoVE J. Vis. Exp. 2013, 75, e50317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Romani, A.; Scarpa, A. Regulation of Cell Magnesium. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1992, 298, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Romani, A.M.P. Magnesium in Eukaryotes. In Encyclopedia of Metalloproteins; Kretsinger, R.H., Uversky, V.N., Permyakov, E.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1255–1264. ISBN 978-1-4614-1533-6. [Google Scholar]
  119. Chabosseau, P.; Tuncay, E.; Meur, G.; Bellomo, E.A.; Hessels, A.; Hughes, S.; Johnson, P.R.V.; Bugliani, M.; Marchetti, P.; Turan, B.; et al. Mitochondrial and ER-Targeted eCALWY Probes Reveal High Levels of Free Zn2+. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 2111–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ellis, C.D.; Wang, F.; MacDiarmid, C.W.; Clark, S.; Lyons, T.; Eide, D.J. Zinc and the Msc2 Zinc Transporter Protein Are Required for Endoplasmic Reticulum Function. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 166, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Grabarek, Z. Insights into Modulation of Calcium Signaling by Magnesium in Calmodulin, Troponin C and Related EF-Hand Proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2011, 1813, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Nara, M.; Morii, H.; Tanokura, M. Coordination to Divalent Cations by Calcium-Binding Proteins Studied by FTIR Spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembr. 2013, 1828, 2319–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Strynadka, N.C.; James, M.N. Crystal Structures of the Helix-Loop-Helix Calcium-Binding Proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1989, 58, 951–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. van de Put, F.H.M.M.; Elliott, A.C. The Endoplasmic Reticulum Can Act as a Functional Ca2+ Store in All Subcellular Regions of the Pancreatic Acinar Cell. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 27764–27770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Waisman, D.M. Annexin II Tetramer: Structure and Function. MolCell Biochem 1995, 149/150, 301–322. [Google Scholar]
  126. Bedard, K.; Szabo, E.; Michalak, M.; Opas, M. Cellular Functions of Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperones Calreticulin, Calnexin, and ERp57. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2005, 245, 91–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Fucikova, J.; Spisek, R.; Kroemer, G.; Galluzzi, L. Calreticulin and Cancer. Cell Res. 2021, 31, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Camacho, P.; Lechleiter, J.D. Calreticulin Inhibits Repetitive Intracellular Ca2+ Waves. Cell 1995, 82, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Nakamura, K.; Zuppini, A.; Arnaudeau, S.; Lynch, J.; Ahsan, I.; Krause, R.; Papp, S.; De Smedt, H.; Parys, J.B.; Muller-Esterl, W.; et al. Functional Specialization of Calreticulin Domains. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Arnaudeau, S.; Frieden, M.; Nakamura, K.; Castelbou, C.; Michalak, M.; Demaurex, N. Calreticulin Differentially Modulates Calcium Uptake and Release in the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 46696–46705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sadasivan, B.; Lehner, P.J.; Ortmann, B.; Spies, T.; Cresswell, P. Roles for Calreticulin and a Novel Glycoprotein, Tapasin, in the Interaction of MHC Class I Molecules with TAP. Immunity 1996, 5, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Gao, B.; Adhikari, R.; Howarth, M.; Nakamura, K.; Gold, M.C.; Hill, A.B.; Knee, R.; Michalak, M.; Elliott, T. Assembly and Antigen-Presenting Function of MHC Class I Molecules in Cells Lacking the ER Chaperone Calreticulin. Immunity 2002, 16, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hebert, D.N.; Foellmer, B.; Helenius, A. Calnexin and Calreticulin Promote Folding, Delay Oligomerization and Suppress Degradation of Influenza Hemagglutinin in Microsomes. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 2961–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Dedhar, S.; Rennie, P.S.; Shago, M.; Hagesteijn, C.-Y.L.; Yang, H.; Filmus, J.; Hawley, R.G.; Bruchovsky, N.; Cheng, H.; Matusik, R.J.; et al. Inhibition of Nuclear Hormone Receptor Activity by Calreticulin. Nature 1994, 367, 480–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Holaska, J.M.; Black, B.E.; Love, D.C.; Hanover, J.A.; Leszyk, J.; Paschal, B.M. Calreticulin Is a Receptor for Nuclear Export. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 152, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Panaretakis, T.; Kepp, O.; Brockmeier, U.; Tesniere, A.; Bjorklund, A.-C.; Chapman, D.C.; Durchschlag, M.; Joza, N.; Pierron, G.; van Endert, P.; et al. Mechanisms of Pre-Apoptotic Calreticulin Exposure in Immunogenic Cell Death. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 578–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Chao, M.P.; Jaiswal, S.; Weissman-Tsukamoto, R.; Alizadeh, A.A.; Gentles, A.J.; Volkmer, J.; Weiskopf, K.; Willingham, S.B.; Raveh, T.; Park, C.Y.; et al. Calreticulin Is the Dominant Pro-Phagocytic Signal on Multiple Human Cancers and Is Counterbalanced by CD47. Sci. Transl. Med. 2010, 2, 63ra94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Gardai, S.J.; McPhillips, K.A.; Frasch, S.C.; Janssen, W.J.; Starefeldt, A.; Murphy-Ullrich, J.E.; Bratton, D.L.; Oldenborg, P.-A.; Michalak, M.; Henson, P.M. Cell-Surface Calreticulin Initiates Clearance of Viable or Apoptotic Cells through Trans-Activation of LRP on the Phagocyte. Cell 2005, 123, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Huang, C.-Y.; Ye, Z.-H.; Huang, M.-Y.; Lu, J.-J. Regulation of CD47 Expression in Cancer Cells. Transl. Oncol. 2020, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, N.; Fine, R.E.; Simons, E.; Johnson, R.J. Decreasing Calreticulin Expression Lowers the Ca2+ Response to Bradykinin and Increases Sensitivity to Ionomycin in NG-108-15 Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 28635–28639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bastianutto, C.; Clementi, E.; Codazzi, F.; Podini, P.; De Giorgi, F.; Rizzuto, R.; Meldolesi, J.; Pozzan, T. Overexpression of Calreticulin Increases the Ca2+ Capacity of Rapidly Exchanging Ca2+ Stores and Reveals Aspects of Their Lumenal Microenvironment and Function. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 130, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Kwon, M.S.; Park, C.S.; Choi, K.; Ahnn, J.; Kim, J.I.; Eom, S.H.; Kaufman, S.J.; Song, W.K. Calreticulin Couples Calcium Release and Calcium Influx in Integrin-Mediated Calcium Signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11, 1433–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Fadel, M.P.; Dziak, E.; Lo, C.M.; Ferrier, J.; Mesaeli, N.; Michalak, M.; Opas, M. Calreticulin Affects Focal Contact-Dependent but Not Close Contact-Dependent Cell-Substratum Adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 15085–15094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Coppolino, M.G.; Dedhar, S. Ligand-Specific, Transient Interaction between Integrins and Calreticulin during Cell Adhesion to Extracellular Matrix Proteins Is Dependent upon Phosphorylation/Dephosphorylation Events. Biochem. J. 1999, 340, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Coppolino, M.G.; Woodside, M.J.; Demaurex, N.; Grinstein, S.; St-Arnaud, R.; Dedhar, S. Calreticulin Is Essential for Integrin-Mediated Calcium Signalling and Cell Adhesion. Nature 1997, 386, 843–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Gold, L.I.; Rahman, M.; Michaels, J.; Callaghan, M.; Deveau-Rosen, J.; Michalak, M.; Gurtner, G.C.; Nanney, L.B. Calreticulin Enhances Wound Healing Via Multiple Biological Effects. Wound Repair Regen. 2005, 13, A4–A27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Gold, L.I.; Rahman, M.; Blechman, K.M.; Greives, M.R.; Churgin, S.; Michaels, J.; Callaghan, M.J.; Cardwell, N.L.; Pollins, A.C.; Michalak, M.; et al. Overview of the Role for Calreticulin in the Enhancement of Wound Healing through Multiple Biological Effects. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 2006, 11, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Obeid, M.; Tesniere, A.; Ghiringhelli, F.; Fimia, G.M.; Apetoh, L.; Perfettini, J.-L.; Castedo, M.; Mignot, G.; Panaretakis, T.; Casares, N.; et al. Calreticulin Exposure Dictates the Immunogenicity of Cancer Cell Death. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Donnelly, S.; Roake, W.; Brown, S.; Young, P.; Naik, H.; Wordsworth, P.; Isenberg, D.A.; Reid, K.B.M.; Eggleton, P. Impaired Recognition of Apoptotic Neutrophils by the C1q/Calreticulin and CD91 Pathway in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 1543–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Obeid, M.; Panaretakis, T.; Tesniere, A.; Joza, N.; Tufi, R.; Apetoh, L.; Ghiringhelli, F.; Zitvogel, L.; Kroemer, G. Leveraging the Immune System during Chemotherapy: Moving Calreticulin to the Cell Surface Converts Apoptotic Death from “Silent” to Immunogenic. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 7941–7944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Obeid, M.; Tesniere, A.; Panaretakis, T.; Tufi, R.; Joza, N.; van Endert, P.; Ghiringhelli, F.; Apetoh, L.; Chaput, N.; Flament, C.; et al. Ecto-Calreticulin in Immunogenic Chemotherapy. Immunol. Rev. 2007, 220, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Basu, S.; Srivastava, P.K. Calreticulin, a Peptide-Binding Chaperone of the Endoplasmic Reticulum, Elicits Tumor- and Peptide-Specific Immunity. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Totary-Jain, H.; Naveh-Many, T.; Riahi, Y.; Kaiser, N.; Eckel, J.; Sasson, S. Calreticulin Destabilizes Glucose Transporter-1 mRNA in Vascular Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells under High-Glucose Conditions. Circ. Res. 2005, 97, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Nickenig, G.; Michaelsen, F.; Müller, C.; Berger, A.; Vogel, T.; Sachinidis, A.; Vetter, H.; Böhm, M. Destabilization of AT(1) Receptor mRNA by Calreticulin. Circ. Res. 2002, 90, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Bharadwaj, A.G.; Okura, G.C.; Woods, J.W.; Allen, E.A.; Miller, V.A.; Kempster, E.; Hancock, M.A.; Gujar, S.; Slibinskas, R.; Waisman, D.M. Identification and Characterization of Calreticulin as a Novel Plasminogen Receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2023, 300, 105465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mesaeli, N.; Nakamura, K.; Zvaritch, E.; Dickie, P.; Dziak, E.; Krause, K.H.; Opas, M.; MacLennan, D.H.; Michalak, M. Calreticulin Is Essential for Cardiac Development. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 144, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Rauch, F.; Prud’homme, J.; Arabian, A.; Dedhar, S.; St-Arnaud, R. Heart, Brain, and Body Wall Defects in Mice Lacking Calreticulin. Exp. Cell Res. 2000, 256, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Coppolino, M.G.; Dedhar, S. Calreticulin. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1998, 30, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Nakamura, K.; Robertson, M.; Liu, G.; Dickie, P.; Nakamura, K.; Guo, J.Q.; Duff, H.J.; Opas, M.; Kavanagh, K.; Michalak, M. Complete Heart Block and Sudden Death in Mice Overexpressing Calreticulin. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Berridge, M.J. Neuronal Calcium Signaling. Neuron 1998, 21, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Verkhratsky, A.; Orkand, R.K.; Kettenmann, H. Glial Calcium: Homeostasis and Signaling Function. Physiol. Rev. 1998, 78, 99–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Gilabert, J.A.; Parekh, A.B. Respiring Mitochondria Determine the Pattern of Activation and Inactivation of the Store-Operated Ca(2+) Current I(CRAC). EMBO J. 2000, 19, 6401–6407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Lin, J.H.; Walter, P.; Yen, T.S.B. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Disease Pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2008, 3, 399–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Rao, R.V.; Ellerby, H.M.; Bredesen, D.E. Coupling Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress to the Cell Death Program. Cell Death Differ. 2004, 11, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Zheng, S.; Wang, X.; Zhao, D.; Liu, H.; Hu, Y. Calcium Homeostasis and Cancer: Insights from Endoplasmic Reticulum-Centered Organelle Communications. Trends Cell Biol. 2023, 33, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Gangola, P.; Rosen, B.P. Maintenance of Intracellular Calcium in Escherichia Coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 12570–12574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Watkins, N.J.; Knight, M.R.; Trewavas, A.J.; Campbell, A.K. Free Calcium Transients in Chemotactic and Non-Chemotactic Strains of Escherichia Coli Determined by Using Recombinant Aequorin. Biochem. J. 1995, 306, 865–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Takenaka, H.; Adler, P.N.; Katz, A.M. Calcium Fluxes across the Membrane of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 12649–12656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Mignery, G.A.; Südhof, T.C.; Takei, K.; De Camilli, P. Putative Receptor for Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Similar to Ryanodine Receptor. Nature 1989, 342, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Campbell, K.P.; Knudson, C.M.; Imagawa, T.; Leung, A.T.; Sutko, J.L.; Kahl, S.D.; Raab, C.R.; Madson, L. Identification and Characterization of the High Affinity [3H]Ryanodine Receptor of the Junctional Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Release Channel. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 6460–6463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Inui, M.; Saito, A.; Fleischer, S. Purification of the Ryanodine Receptor and Identity with Feet Structures of Junctional Terminal Cisternae of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum from Fast Skeletal Muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 1740–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Lang, S.; Erdmann, F.; Jung, M.; Wagner, R.; Cavalie, A.; Zimmermann, R. Sec61 Complexes Form Ubiquitous ER Ca2+ Leak Channels. Channels 2011, 5, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Lièvremont, J.P.; Rizzuto, R.; Hendershot, L.; Meldolesi, J. BiP, a Major Chaperone Protein of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Lumen, Plays a Direct and Important Role in the Storage of the Rapidly Exchanging Pool of Ca2+. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 30873–30879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Lamb, H.K.; Mee, C.; Xu, W.; Liu, L.; Blond, S.; Cooper, A.; Charles, I.G.; Hawkins, A.R. The Affinity of a Major Ca2+ Binding Site on GRP78 Is Differentially Enhanced by ADP and ATP. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 8796–8805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Liou, J.; Kim, M.L.; Heo, W.D.; Jones, J.T.; Myers, J.W.; Ferrell, J.E.; Meyer, T. STIM Is a Ca2+ Sensor Essential for Ca2+-Store-Depletion-Triggered Ca2+ Influx. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Roos, J.; DiGregorio, P.J.; Yeromin, A.V.; Ohlsen, K.; Lioudyno, M.; Zhang, S.; Safrina, O.; Kozak, J.A.; Wagner, S.L.; Cahalan, M.D.; et al. STIM1, an Essential and Conserved Component of Store-Operated Ca2+ Channel Function. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 169, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Feske, S.; Gwack, Y.; Prakriya, M.; Srikanth, S.; Puppel, S.-H.; Tanasa, B.; Hogan, P.G.; Lewis, R.S.; Daly, M.; Rao, A. A Mutation in Orai1 Causes Immune Deficiency by Abrogating CRAC Channel Function. Nature 2006, 441, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Vig, M.; Peinelt, C.; Beck, A.; Koomoa, D.L.; Rabah, D.; Koblan-Huberson, M.; Kraft, S.; Turner, H.; Fleig, A.; Penner, R.; et al. CRACM1 Is a Plasma Membrane Protein Essential for Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry. Science 2006, 312, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Zhang, S.L.; Yeromin, A.V.; Zhang, X.H.-F.; Yu, Y.; Safrina, O.; Penna, A.; Roos, J.; Stauderman, K.A.; Cahalan, M.D. Genome-Wide RNAi Screen of Ca(2+) Influx Identifies Genes That Regulate Ca(2+) Release-Activated Ca(2+) Channel Activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 9357–9362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Shim, A.H.-R.; Tirado-Lee, L.; Prakriya, M. Structural and Functional Mechanisms of CRAC Channel Regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 2015, 427, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Tu, B.P.; Ho-Schleyer, S.C.; Travers, K.J.; Weissman, J.S. Biochemical Basis of Oxidative Protein Folding in the Endoplasmic Reticulum. Science 2000, 290, 1571–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Bader, M.; Muse, W.; Ballou, D.P.; Gassner, C.; Bardwell, J.C. Oxidative Protein Folding Is Driven by the Electron Transport System. Cell 1999, 98, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ziegler, D.M.; Poulsen, L.L. Protein Disulfide Bond Synthesis: A Possible Intracellular Mechanism. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1977, 2, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Hwang, C.; Sinskey, A.J.; Lodish, H.F. Oxidized Redox State of Glutathione in the Endoplasmic Reticulum. Science 1992, 257, 1496–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Ying, M.; Flatmark, T. Binding of the Viral Immunogenic Octapeptide VSV8 to Native Glucose-Regulated Protein Grp94 (Gp96) and Its Inhibition by the Physiological Ligands ATP and Ca2+. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Mery, L.; Mesaeli, N.; Michalak, M.; Opas, M.; Lew, D.P.; Krause, K.H. Overexpression of Calreticulin Increases Intracellular Ca2+ Storage and Decreases Store-Operated Ca2+ Influx. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 9332–9339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. John, L.M.; Lechleiter, J.D.; Camacho, P. Differential Modulation of SERCA2 Isoforms by Calreticulin. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142, 963–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Llewelyn Roderick, H.; Llewellyn, D.H.; Campbell, A.K.; Kendall, J.M. Role of Calreticulin in Regulating Intracellular Ca2+ Storage and Capacitative Ca2+ Entry in HeLa Cells. Cell Calcium 1998, 24, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Xu, W.; Longo, F.J.; Wintermantel, M.R.; Jiang, X.; Clark, R.A.; DeLisle, S. Calreticulin Modulates Capacitative Ca2+ Influx by Controlling the Extent of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate-Induced Ca2+ Store Depletion. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 36676–36682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Daverkausen-Fischer, L.; Pröls, F. Regulation of Calcium Homeostasis and Flux between the Endoplasmic Reticulum and the Cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 102061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Leung-Hagesteijn, C.Y.; Milankov, K.; Michalak, M.; Wilkins, J.; Dedhar, S. Cell Attachment to Extracellular Matrix Substrates Is Inhibited upon Downregulation of Expression of Calreticulin, an Intracellular Integrin Alpha-Subunit-Binding Protein. J. Cell Sci. 1994, 107, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Helenius, A. How N-Linked Oligosaccharides Affect Glycoprotein Folding in the Endoplasmic Reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell 1994, 5, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Lamriben, L.; Graham, J.B.; Adams, B.M.; Hebert, D.N. N-Glycan Based ER Molecular Chaperone and Protein Quality Control System: The Calnexin Binding Cycle. Traffic Cph. Den. 2016, 17, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wijeyesakere, S.J.; Gagnon, J.K.; Arora, K.; Brooks, C.L.; Raghavan, M. Regulation of Calreticulin-Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I Interactions by ATP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E5608–E5617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Kozlov, G.; Muñoz-Escobar, J.; Castro, K.; Gehring, K. Mapping the ER Interactome: The P Domains of Calnexin and Calreticulin as Plurivalent Adapters for Foldases and Chaperones. Structure 2017, 25, 1415–1422.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Corbett, E.F.; Michalak, K.M.; Oikawa, K.; Johnson, S.; Campbell, I.D.; Eggleton, P.; Kay, C.; Michalak, M. The Conformation of Calreticulin Is Influenced by the Endoplasmic Reticulum Luminal Environment. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 27177–27185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Olson, E.; Raghavan, M. Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Assembly within Endolysosomal Pathways. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2023, 84, 102356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Diedrich, G.; Bangia, N.; Pan, M.; Cresswell, P. A Role for Calnexin in the Assembly of the MHC Class I Loading Complex in the Endoplasmic Reticulum1. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Kanaseki, T.; Blanchard, N.; Hammer, G.E.; Gonzalez, F.; Shastri, N. ERAAP Synergizes with MHC Class I Molecules to Make the Final Cut in the Antigenic Peptide Precursors in the Endoplasmic Reticulum. Immunity 2006, 25, 795–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Lan, B.H.; Becker, M.; Freund, C. The Mode of Action of Tapasin on Major Histocompatibility Class I (MHC-I) Molecules. J. Biol. Chem. 2023, 299, 102987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Spiliotis, E.T.; Osorio, M.; Zúñiga, M.C.; Edidin, M. Selective Export of MHC Class I Molecules from the ER after Their Dissociation from TAP. Immunity 2000, 13, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Arshad, N.; Cresswell, P. Tumor-Associated Calreticulin Variants Functionally Compromise the Peptide Loading Complex and Impair Its Recruitment of MHC-I. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 9555–9569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Liu, C.; Fu, H.; Flutter, B.; Powis, S.J.; Gao, B. Suppression of MHC Class I Surface Expression by Calreticulin’s P-Domain in a Calreticulin Deficient Cell Line. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1803, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Wearsch, P.A.; Peaper, D.R.; Cresswell, P. Essential Glycan-Dependent Interactions Optimize MHC Class I Peptide Loading. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4950–4955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Dong, G.; Wearsch, P.A.; Peaper, D.R.; Cresswell, P.; Reinisch, K.M. Insights into MHC Class I Peptide Loading from the Structure of the Tapasin-ERp57 Thiol Oxidoreductase Heterodimer. Immunity 2009, 30, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Del Cid, N.; Jeffery, E.; Rizvi, S.M.; Stamper, E.; Peters, L.R.; Brown, W.C.; Provoda, C.; Raghavan, M. Modes of Calreticulin Recruitment to the Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Assembly Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 4520–4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Howe, C.; Garstka, M.; Al-Balushi, M.; Ghanem, E.; Antoniou, A.N.; Fritzsche, S.; Jankevicius, G.; Kontouli, N.; Schneeweiss, C.; Williams, A.; et al. Calreticulin-Dependent Recycling in the Early Secretory Pathway Mediates Optimal Peptide Loading of MHC Class I Molecules. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 3730–3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Païdassi, H.; Tacnet-Delorme, P.; Verneret, M.; Gaboriaud, C.; Houen, G.; Duus, K.; Ling, W.L.; Arlaud, G.J.; Frachet, P. Investigations on the C1q-Calreticulin-Phosphatidylserine Interactions Yield New Insights into Apoptotic Cell Recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 408, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Verneret, M.; Tacnet-Delorme, P.; Osman, R.; Awad, R.; Grichine, A.; Kleman, J.-P.; Frachet, P. Relative Contribution of C1q and Apoptotic Cell-Surface Calreticulin to Macrophage Phagocytosis. J. Innate Immun. 2014, 6, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Cockram, T.O.J.; Puigdellívol, M.; Brown, G.C. Calreticulin and Galectin-3 Opsonise Bacteria for Phagocytosis by Microglia. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Obeid, M. ERP57 Membrane Translocation Dictates the Immunogenicity of Tumor Cell Death by Controlling the Membrane Translocation of Calreticulin. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 2533–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Liu, C.-C.; Leclair, P.; Pedari, F.; Vieira, H.; Monajemi, M.; Sly, L.M.; Reid, G.S.; Lim, C.J. Integrins and ERp57 Coordinate to Regulate Cell Surface Calreticulin in Immunogenic Cell Death. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Tanaka, M.; Kataoka, H.; Yano, S.; Sawada, T.; Akashi, H.; Inoue, M.; Suzuki, S.; Inagaki, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Nishie, H.; et al. Immunogenic Cell Death Due to a New Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) with Glycoconjugated Chlorin (G-Chlorin). Oncotarget 2016, 7, 47242–47251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Zhu, M.; Yang, M.; Zhang, J.; Yin, Y.; Fan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, S.; Zhang, H.; Yu, F. Immunogenic Cell Death Induction by Ionizing Radiation. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 705361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Lin, K. Immunogenic Cell Death-Based Oncolytic Virus Therapy: A Sharp Sword of Tumor Immunotherapy. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2024, 981, 176913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Chen, L.; Wen, Y.; Xiong, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C. An Immunogenic Cell Death-Related Gene Signature Reflects Immune Landscape and Predicts Prognosis in Melanoma Independently of BRAF V600E Status. BioMed Res. Int. 2023, 2023, 1189022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Cifric, S.; Turi, M.; Folino, P.; Clericuzio, C.; Barello, F.; Maciel, T.; Anderson, K.C.; Gulla, A. DAMPening Tumor Immune Escape: The Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperones in Immunogenic Chemotherapy. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2024, 41, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Tsutsumi, H.; Inoue, H.; Shiraishi, Y.; Hirayama, A.; Nakanishi, T.; Ando, H.; Nakajima, M.; Shinozaki, S.; Ogata, H.; Okamura, K.; et al. Impact of Increased Plasma Levels of Calreticulin on Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer Undergoing Combination Treatment of Chemotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Lung Cancer 2023, 181, 107264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Kim, D.-Y.; Pyo, A.; Yun, M.; Thangam, R.; You, S.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Jung, Y.; Nguyen, D.-H.; Venu, A.; Kim, H.S.; et al. Imaging Calreticulin for Early Detection of Immunogenic Cell Death During Anticancer Treatment. J. Nucl. Med. 2021, 62, 956–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Feng, M.; Marjon, K.D.; Zhu, F.; Weissman-Tsukamoto, R.; Levett, A.; Sullivan, K.; Kao, K.S.; Markovic, M.; Bump, P.A.; Jackson, H.M.; et al. Programmed Cell Removal by Calreticulin in Tissue Homeostasis and Cancer. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Andriani, A.; Latagliata, R.; Anaclerico, B.; Spadea, A.; Rago, A.; Di Veroli, A.; Spirito, F.; Porrini, R.; De Muro, M.; Crescenzi Leonetti, S.; et al. Spleen Enlargement Is a Risk Factor for Thrombosis in Essential Thrombocythemia: Evaluation on 1,297 Patients. Am. J. Hematol. 2016, 91, 318–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Mancuso, S.; Accurso, V.; Santoro, M.; Raso, S.; Contrino, A.D.; Perez, A.; Di Piazza, F.; Florena, A.M.; Russo, A.; Siragusa, S. The Essential Thrombocythemia, Thrombotic Risk Stratification, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Adv. Hematol. 2020, 2020, 9124821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Radaelli, F.; Colombi, M.; Calori, R.; Zilioli, V.R.; Bramanti, S.; Iurlo, A.; Zanella, A. Analysis of Risk Factors Predicting Thrombotic and/or Haemorrhagic Complications in 306 Patients with Essential Thrombocythemia. Hematol. Oncol. 2007, 25, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Regev, A.; Stark, P.; Blickstein, D.; Lahav, M. Thrombotic Complications in Essential Thrombocythemia with Relatively Low Platelet Counts. Am. J. Hematol. 1997, 56, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Małecki, R.; Gacka, M.; Kuliszkiewicz-Janus, M.; Jakobsche-Policht, U.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Adamiec, R.; Undas, A. Altered Plasma Fibrin Clot Properties in Essential Thrombocythemia. Platelets 2016, 27, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Medcalf, R.L.; Keragala, C.B. The Fibrinolytic System: Mysteries and Opportunities. HemaSphere 2021, 5, e570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Keragala, C.B.; Medcalf, R.L. Plasminogen: An Enigmatic Zymogen. Blood 2021, 137, 2881–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Aisina, R.B.; Mukhametova, L.I. Structure and Function of Plasminogen/Plasmin System. Russ. J. Bioorganic Chem. 2014, 40, 590–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Nougier, C.; Benoit, R.; Simon, M.; Desmurs-Clavel, H.; Marcotte, G.; Argaud, L.; David, J.S.; Bonnet, A.; Negrier, C.; Dargaud, Y. Hypofibrinolytic State and High Thrombin Generation May Play a Major Role in SARS-COV-2 Associated Thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 2215–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Marcos-Contreras, O.A.; Martinez de Lizarrondo, S.; Bardou, I.; Orset, C.; Pruvost, M.; Anfray, A.; Frigout, Y.; Hommet, Y.; Lebouvier, L.; Montaner, J.; et al. Hyperfibrinolysis Increases Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability by a Plasmin- and Bradykinin-Dependent Mechanism. Blood 2016, 128, 2423–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Miles, L.A.; Plow, E.F.; Waisman, D.M.; Parmer, R.J. Plasminogen Receptors. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 130735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Plow, E.F.; Doeuvre, L.; Das, R. So Many Plasminogen Receptors: Why? J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 141806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Miles, L.A.; Parmer, R.J. Plasminogen Receptors: The First Quarter Century. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2013, 39, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Godier, A.; Hunt, B.J. Plasminogen Receptors and Their Role in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory, Autoimmune and Malignant Disease. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH 2013, 11, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Medcalf, R.L. Fibrinolysis: From Blood to the Brain. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH 2017, 15, 2089–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Klampfl, T.; Gisslinger, H.; Harutyunyan, A.S.; Nivarthi, H.; Rumi, E.; Milosevic, J.D.; Them, N.C.C.; Berg, T.; Gisslinger, B.; Pietra, D.; et al. Somatic Mutations of Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2379–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Nangalia, J.; Massie, C.E.; Baxter, E.J.; Nice, F.L.; Gundem, G.; Wedge, D.C.; Avezov, E.; Li, J.; Kollmann, K.; Kent, D.G.; et al. Somatic CALR Mutations in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms with Nonmutated JAK2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2391–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Rumi, E.; Pietra, D.; Guglielmelli, P.; Bordoni, R.; Casetti, I.; Milanesi, C.; Sant’Antonio, E.; Ferretti, V.; Pancrazzi, A.; Rotunno, G.; et al. Acquired Copy-Neutral Loss of Heterozygosity of Chromosome 1p as a Molecular Event Associated with Marrow Fibrosis in MPL-Mutated Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Blood 2013, 121, 4388–4395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Pérez Encinas, M.M.; Sobas, M.; Gómez-Casares, M.T.; Abuin Blanco, A.; Noya Pereira, M.S.; Raya, J.M.; Andrade-Campos, M.M.; Álvarez Larrán, A.; Lewandowski, K.; Łukasz, S.; et al. The Risk of Thrombosis in Essential Thrombocythemia Is Associated with the Type of CALR Mutation: A Multicentre Collaborative Study. Eur. J. Haematol. 2021, 106, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Rotunno, G.; Mannarelli, C.; Guglielmelli, P.; Pacilli, A.; Pancrazzi, A.; Pieri, L.; Fanelli, T.; Bosi, A.; Vannucchi, A.M.; Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Gruppo Italiano Malattie Mieloproliferative Investigators. Impact of Calreticulin Mutations on Clinical and Hematological Phenotype and Outcome in Essential Thrombocythemia. Blood 2014, 123, 1552–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Araki, M.; Yang, Y.; Masubuchi, N.; Hironaka, Y.; Takei, H.; Morishita, S.; Mizukami, Y.; Kan, S.; Shirane, S.; Edahiro, Y.; et al. Activation of the Thrombopoietin Receptor by Mutant Calreticulin in CALR-Mutant Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Blood 2016, 127, 1307–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Elf, S.; Abdelfattah, N.S.; Chen, E.; Perales-Patón, J.; Rosen, E.A.; Ko, A.; Peisker, F.; Florescu, N.; Giannini, S.; Wolach, O.; et al. Mutant Calreticulin Requires Both Its Mutant C-Terminus and the Thrombopoietin Receptor for Oncogenic Transformation. Cancer Discov. 2016, 6, 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Elf, S.; Abdelfattah, N.S.; Baral, A.J.; Beeson, D.; Rivera, J.F.; Ko, A.; Florescu, N.; Birrane, G.; Chen, E.; Mullally, A. Defining the Requirements for the Pathogenic Interaction between Mutant Calreticulin and MPL in MPN. Blood 2018, 131, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Pecquet, C.; Chachoua, I.; Roy, A.; Balligand, T.; Vertenoeil, G.; Leroy, E.; Albu, R.-I.; Defour, J.-P.; Nivarthi, H.; Hug, E.; et al. Calreticulin Mutants as Oncogenic Rogue Chaperones for TpoR and Traffic-Defective Pathogenic TpoR Mutants. Blood 2019, 133, 2669–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Kuwabara, K.; Pinsky, D.J.; Schmidt, A.M.; Benedict, B.; Brett, B.; Ogawa, S.; Broekman, M.J.; Marcus, A.J.; Sciacca, R.R.; Michalak, M.; et al. Calreticulin, an Antithrombotic Agent Which Binds to Vitamin K-Dependent Coagulation Factors, Stimulates Endothelial Nitric Oxide Production, and Limits Thrombosis in Canine Coronary Arteries (∗). J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 8179–8187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Dai, E.; Stewart, M.; Ritchie, B.; Mesaeli, N.; Raha, S.; Kolodziejczyk, D.; Hobman, M.L.; Liu, L.Y.; Etches, W.; Nation, N.; et al. Calreticulin, a Potential Vascular Regulatory Protein, Reduces Intimal Hyperplasia after Arterial Injury. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1997, 17, 2359–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Liu, P.; Zhao, L.; Loos, F.; Marty, C.; Xie, W.; Martins, I.; Lachkar, S.; Qu, B.; Waeckel-Énée, E.; Plo, I.; et al. Immunosuppression by Mutated Calreticulin Released from Malignant Cells. Mol. Cell 2019, 77, 748–760.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Liu, P.; Zhao, L.; Kroemer, G.; Kepp, O. Secreted Calreticulin Mutants Subvert Anticancer Immunosurveillance. OncoImmunology 2020, 9, 1708126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Gigoux, M.; Holmström, M.O.; Zappasodi, R.; Park, J.J.; Pourpe, S.; Bozkus, C.C.; Mangarin, L.M.B.; Redmond, D.; Verma, S.; Schad, S.; et al. Calreticulin Mutant Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Induce MHC-I Skewing, Which Can Be Overcome by an Optimized Peptide Cancer Vaccine. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eaba4380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Ibarra, J.; Elbanna, Y.A.; Kurylowicz, K.; Ciboddo, M.; Greenbaum, H.S.; Arellano, N.S.; Rodriguez, D.; Evers, M.; Bock-Hughes, A.; Liu, C.; et al. Type I but Not Type II Calreticulin Mutations Activate the IRE1α/XBP1 Pathway of the Unfolded Protein Response to Drive Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Blood Cancer Discov. 2022, 3, 298–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Densiometric analysis of SR proteins stained with Coomassie blue (A) or Stains-all (B) following separation of the MacLennan SR preparation by Laemmli SDS-PAGE. The highlighted proteins include the Ca2+ ATPase (A), calsequestrin (CS), and the 53 kDa glycoprotein (G). The figure shows intense staining of calsequestrin by Stains-all but the absence of this staining in the 55 kDa region, the region occupied by the HACBP/CRT (the region to the right of CS). The line indicates the positions of the bands corresponding to the HACBP. Reproduced from [5] by permission from Dr. Kevin Campbell.
Figure 1. Densiometric analysis of SR proteins stained with Coomassie blue (A) or Stains-all (B) following separation of the MacLennan SR preparation by Laemmli SDS-PAGE. The highlighted proteins include the Ca2+ ATPase (A), calsequestrin (CS), and the 53 kDa glycoprotein (G). The figure shows intense staining of calsequestrin by Stains-all but the absence of this staining in the 55 kDa region, the region occupied by the HACBP/CRT (the region to the right of CS). The line indicates the positions of the bands corresponding to the HACBP. Reproduced from [5] by permission from Dr. Kevin Campbell.
Cancers 17 00288 g001
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE of proteins extracted from microsomes of rat skeletal muscle (1), liver (2), parotid (3), pancreas (4), and brain (5). The proteins were stained with “Stains-all” (lanes 1–5). The proteins indicated by the two arrows, calsequestrin and calregulin (calreticulin), are stained blue. Lane 6 is a western blot of lane 5, using an anti-calregulin antibody. Reprinted by permission from the Journal of Biological Chemistry [16].
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE of proteins extracted from microsomes of rat skeletal muscle (1), liver (2), parotid (3), pancreas (4), and brain (5). The proteins were stained with “Stains-all” (lanes 1–5). The proteins indicated by the two arrows, calsequestrin and calregulin (calreticulin), are stained blue. Lane 6 is a western blot of lane 5, using an anti-calregulin antibody. Reprinted by permission from the Journal of Biological Chemistry [16].
Cancers 17 00288 g002
Figure 4. Roles of calreticulin (CRT) in multiple cellular pathways and processes. Wildtype CRT (CRTWT) plays a crucial role in major histocompatibility class I (MHC I) folding, processing, and antigen presentation. MHC 1 interacts with Erp57 in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), along with tapasin, along with the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP), and form the peptide-loading complex. These proteins load the antigen to MHC I and then transport the complex via the Golgi apparatus to the cell surface. CRT binds to the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin α-subunit (shown in purple), activating integrin. The activated integrin binds the extracellular matrix proteins (ECM), resulting in cellular adhesion. Upon this integrin engagement, a transient elevation in the cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) concentration is mediated by both Ca2+ influx (through a voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channel—not shown) and release from intracellular Ca2+ stores via inositol trisphosphate (IP3). Mutant CRT (CRTmut), expressed by patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), are secreted outside the cell and bind to the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL), resulting in the activation of MPL and downstream signaling via the JAK-STAT pathway via the phosphorylation of JAK (JAK-P) and STAT (STAT-P). This results in transcriptional activation of genes involved in cell survival and proliferation, causing MPNs.
Figure 4. Roles of calreticulin (CRT) in multiple cellular pathways and processes. Wildtype CRT (CRTWT) plays a crucial role in major histocompatibility class I (MHC I) folding, processing, and antigen presentation. MHC 1 interacts with Erp57 in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), along with tapasin, along with the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP), and form the peptide-loading complex. These proteins load the antigen to MHC I and then transport the complex via the Golgi apparatus to the cell surface. CRT binds to the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin α-subunit (shown in purple), activating integrin. The activated integrin binds the extracellular matrix proteins (ECM), resulting in cellular adhesion. Upon this integrin engagement, a transient elevation in the cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) concentration is mediated by both Ca2+ influx (through a voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channel—not shown) and release from intracellular Ca2+ stores via inositol trisphosphate (IP3). Mutant CRT (CRTmut), expressed by patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), are secreted outside the cell and bind to the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL), resulting in the activation of MPL and downstream signaling via the JAK-STAT pathway via the phosphorylation of JAK (JAK-P) and STAT (STAT-P). This results in transcriptional activation of genes involved in cell survival and proliferation, causing MPNs.
Cancers 17 00288 g004
Figure 5. Roles of calreticulin (CRT) in phagocytosis and immunogenic cell death (ICD). (A) Activated microglia from the brain secrete CRT, which binds to E. coli (bacteria), further enhancing their phagocytosis by the microglia. This limits infection in the brain. (B) Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a process that causes cancer cell death by eliciting an immune response. Several chemotherapeutic agents, such as anthracyclines and oxaliplatin, as well as photodynamic therapy (PDT) and oncolytic viruses, result in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, phosphorylation of eIF-2α, activation of caspase 8, and cell-surface exposure of CRT. The cell-surface CRT is recognized by dendritic cells via receptors, such as low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), C1q, and possibly other unknown proteins, which result in the engulfment of the apoptotic cancer cell. (C) CRT also plays a role in tissue homeostasis. Activated macrophages secrete CRT, which binds to viable or apoptotic neutrophils and other target cells via asialoglycoprotein on their cell surface, resulting in phagocytosis of these cells. This phagocytosis is absent if the asialoglycoprotein on the target cell’s surface is bound by sialic acid.
Figure 5. Roles of calreticulin (CRT) in phagocytosis and immunogenic cell death (ICD). (A) Activated microglia from the brain secrete CRT, which binds to E. coli (bacteria), further enhancing their phagocytosis by the microglia. This limits infection in the brain. (B) Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a process that causes cancer cell death by eliciting an immune response. Several chemotherapeutic agents, such as anthracyclines and oxaliplatin, as well as photodynamic therapy (PDT) and oncolytic viruses, result in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, phosphorylation of eIF-2α, activation of caspase 8, and cell-surface exposure of CRT. The cell-surface CRT is recognized by dendritic cells via receptors, such as low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), C1q, and possibly other unknown proteins, which result in the engulfment of the apoptotic cancer cell. (C) CRT also plays a role in tissue homeostasis. Activated macrophages secrete CRT, which binds to viable or apoptotic neutrophils and other target cells via asialoglycoprotein on their cell surface, resulting in phagocytosis of these cells. This phagocytosis is absent if the asialoglycoprotein on the target cell’s surface is bound by sialic acid.
Cancers 17 00288 g005
Figure 6. Timeline of initial discoveries in the calreticulin field. The initial reports are highlighted. The references are Waisman et al., 1984 [37]; Salimath et al., 1985 [38]; Khanna et al., 1986 [21]; Khanna et al., 1997 [39]; Damiani et al., 1989 [82]; Smith and Koch, 1989 [40]; Eggleton et al., 1994 [105]; Liu et al., 1994 [140]; Dedhar, 1994 [134]; Peterson et al., 1995 [63]; Sadasivan et al., 1996 [131]; Coppolino et al., 1997 [145]; Coppolino and Dedhar 1998 [158]; Nair et al., 1999 [64]; Saito et al., 1999 [58]; Ellgaard et al., 2001 [79]; Gardai et al., 2005 [138]; Conte et al., 2007 [86]; Obeid et al., 2007 [148]; Kozlov et al., 2010 [56]; Chouquet et al., 2011 [55]; Klampf et al., 2013 [236]; Nangalia et al., 2013 [237]; Avezov et al., 2015 [78]; Wijeyesakere et al., 2016 [87]; Bharadwaj et al., 2024 [155].
Figure 6. Timeline of initial discoveries in the calreticulin field. The initial reports are highlighted. The references are Waisman et al., 1984 [37]; Salimath et al., 1985 [38]; Khanna et al., 1986 [21]; Khanna et al., 1997 [39]; Damiani et al., 1989 [82]; Smith and Koch, 1989 [40]; Eggleton et al., 1994 [105]; Liu et al., 1994 [140]; Dedhar, 1994 [134]; Peterson et al., 1995 [63]; Sadasivan et al., 1996 [131]; Coppolino et al., 1997 [145]; Coppolino and Dedhar 1998 [158]; Nair et al., 1999 [64]; Saito et al., 1999 [58]; Ellgaard et al., 2001 [79]; Gardai et al., 2005 [138]; Conte et al., 2007 [86]; Obeid et al., 2007 [148]; Kozlov et al., 2010 [56]; Chouquet et al., 2011 [55]; Klampf et al., 2013 [236]; Nangalia et al., 2013 [237]; Avezov et al., 2015 [78]; Wijeyesakere et al., 2016 [87]; Bharadwaj et al., 2024 [155].
Cancers 17 00288 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okura, G.C.; Bharadwaj, A.G.; Waisman, D.M. Calreticulin—From the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Plasma Membrane—Adventures of a Wandering Protein. Cancers 2025, 17, 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020288

AMA Style

Okura GC, Bharadwaj AG, Waisman DM. Calreticulin—From the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Plasma Membrane—Adventures of a Wandering Protein. Cancers. 2025; 17(2):288. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okura, Gillian C., Alamelu G. Bharadwaj, and David M. Waisman. 2025. "Calreticulin—From the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Plasma Membrane—Adventures of a Wandering Protein" Cancers 17, no. 2: 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020288

APA Style

Okura, G. C., Bharadwaj, A. G., & Waisman, D. M. (2025). Calreticulin—From the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Plasma Membrane—Adventures of a Wandering Protein. Cancers, 17(2), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop