Next Article in Journal
A Bio-Based Tackifier Synthesized by Room-Temperature Cationic Copolymerization of Isobutene and β-Pinene
Previous Article in Journal
Ni-Ag Catalysts for Hydrogen Production through Dry Reforming of Methane: Characterization and Performance Evaluation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of 6-aryl Dopamine Derivatives

by
Andrea Calcaterra
1,
Santiago Fernández García
1,
Federico Marrone
1,
Roberta Bernini
2,*,
Giancarlo Fabrizi
1,*,
Antonella Goggiamani
1 and
Antonia Iazzetti
3,4
1
Department of Chemistry and Technology of Drugs, Sapienza—University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
4
Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’ Foundation-IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2024, 14(7), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14070401
Submission received: 6 June 2024 / Revised: 21 June 2024 / Accepted: 22 June 2024 / Published: 25 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Catalytic Materials)

Abstract

:
Dopamine is a key neurotransmitter involved in a series of biologically relevant processes and its derivatives have sparked significant interest as intriguing synthetic targets. This class of compounds is indeed not only considerable for the potential biological activities but is also promising for diverse applications in material science. In light of this, our research was focused on the synthesis of 6-aryldopamine derivatives starting from 4-(2-aminoethyl)phenol through a sequential protocol, whose main steps are hydroxylation, halogenation, and Suzuki cross-coupling. Our method demonstrated versatility, efficiency, and compatibility with various functional groups, including aldehydes, ketones, esters, ethers, and fluorine.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Dopamine is a biological monoamine included in the class of “catecholamines”, a family of neurotransmitters to which norepinephrine and epinephrine also belong [1].
It is synthesized both in the central nervous system (CNS) and in the periphery, and works by activating G-coupled protein receptors, also known as dopamine receptors. Specifically, there are five different types of dopamine receptors, which include D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5. Each kind of receptor has a different function and is found in different locations, such as the CNS, blood vessels, kidneys, heart, retina, and adrenal glands [2,3].
Dopamine exhibits various biological functions. For instance, it has key roles in regulating motor neurons, spatial memory function, motivation, arousal, reward, and pleasure, as well as lactation, sexual, and maternal behaviors.
Dopamine applications in therapy include the correction of hemodynamic imbalances present in shock syndrome, Ref. [4] traumatic brain injury, Ref. [5] septic shock, Ref. [6] and open heart surgery Ref. [7].
Furthermore, due to the ability of the catechol moiety to scavenge free radicals, Ref. [8], it provides an antioxidant defense in the brain against oxidant agents and free radical-induced damage [9].
Because of these remarkable features, the synthesis and metabolism of dopamine derivatives have been of great interest to researchers in various fields, including neuroscience, pharmacology, and medicinal chemistry.
Particularly, 6-substituted dopamine analogs have garnered attention due to their potential applications in understanding enzyme mechanisms. In this regard, they have been used as substrates for enzymes like L-DOPA dioxygenase and sulfotransferase 1A3 to investigate these enzymes’ catalytic mechanisms and structural features [10,11]. By studying the interactions between dopamine derivatives and enzymes, researchers investigated the biochemical pathways involved in dopamine metabolism, identifying new drug targets for the treatment of dopamine-related disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and neuropsychiatric disorders.
In addition to their role in enzyme studies, dopamine derivatives have shown promise as potential therapeutic agents. For instance, computational studies suggested that 6-substituted dopamine analogs may act as catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, which could be useful in the treatment of conditions such as Parkinson’s disease [12]. Particularly, it was demonstrated that by inhibiting the activity of catechol-O-methyl transferase, these compounds could regulate dopamine levels in the brain and alleviate symptoms associated with dopamine dysregulation.
Furthermore, dopamine derivatives have been explored for their potential applications in material science. For example, the ability of dopamine derivatives to coordinate metal ions makes them ideal candidates for sensing applications characterized by high selectivity and sensitivity. In this regard, catechol-based materials are known to be used for the detection of metal ions in solution, providing a simple and cost-effective way to monitor metal concentrations [13].
Because of the presence of the catechol ring, dopamine and its derivatives exhibit adhesive properties that have inspired the development of biomimetic materials for various applications. For example, DOPA/catechol-tethered polymers have been used as adhesive materials that mimic the adhesion mechanisms of marine organisms, such as mussels [14]. These materials showed excellent adhesion to a variety of surfaces, making them attractive for use in medical devices, tissue engineering, and other biomaterial applications [15].
Thus, the remarkable versatility of dopamine derivatives captured our interest, prompting us to embark on the development of a synthetic protocol for 6-substituted dopamine derivatives utilizing palladium catalysis.
Drawing upon our experience in palladium catalysis for the synthesis and functionalization of biologically significant derivatives [16,17,18], and based on our previous work on hydroxytyrosol derivative synthesis via Suzuki−Miyaura cross-coupling (Scheme 1a), Ref. [19], we were inspired to expand our research efforts to devise a methodology for producing 6-substituted dopamine analogs (Scheme 1b).
This approach is based on the palladium-catalyzed Suzuki coupling of the derivatives 1, in turn, synthesized according to a protocol properly designed and developed. Outlined below are the findings from our investigations.

2. Results and Discussion

The synthesis of compound 1, employed in our investigation, was achieved through a suitably optimized multistep protocol, starting from the commercially available 4-(2-aminoethyl)phenol 5. To avoid the occurrence of the Pictet–Spengler reaction during the acetonide formation, the first proposed step was the amino group protection. Thus, as carbamates are recognized as useful in protecting groups for amines, we decided to convert the 4-(2-aminoethyl)phenol 5 into the corresponding carbamate derivative 6 using dimethyl carbonate (DMC) in the presence of NaHCO3 in MeOH/H2O, at 25 °C (Scheme 2, step 1). The catechol derivative 7 was synthesized from 6 via the regioselective hydroxylation at the C2 position (Scheme 2, step 2) by treatment with iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX) followed by reductive conditions. Before proceeding with the subsequent steps, the catechol protection as acetonide (Scheme 2, step 3) was performed, affording compound 8. Finally, the selective chlorination of C5 with N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) in DCM at 25 °C led to the formation of compound 1a in a satisfactory yield.
The proposed method appeared to be simple overall, with good yields, and generally employes mild reaction conditions. Thus, with this procedure in our hands, we decided to proceed with evaluating the feasibility of the next Suzuki reaction. As a first attempt, we carried out the reaction of 1a, with the phenylboronic acid 2a in the presence of Pd2dba3/Sphos as the catalytic system, and K3PO4 as the base, in 1,4-dioxane at 100 °C (Scheme 3). Surprisingly, we did not observe the formation of the expected cross-coupling product in these conditions, and a significant amount of the methyl indoline-1-carboxylate derivative 9 was isolated.
It is very likely, in these reaction conditions, that the intramolecular palladium-catalyzed N-arylation occurred faster than the transmetallation of the σ complex I with the boronic acid (Scheme 4).
Indeed, as reported in Scheme 4, in the basic reaction conditions, the σ-complex I, formed via oxidative addition of Pd(0) to 1a, was deprotonated into the anionic form II and could rapidly give the six-membered palladacycle III. After a reductive elimination step, the catalytic active specie Pd(0) was regenerated and the final methyl indoline-1-carboxylate derivative 9 was provided.
Therefore, we decided to start over by modifying the structure of the starting material 1. We opted to introduce two protecting groups on the nitrogen atom, so that it would prevent the subsequent cyclization reaction with the σ-palladium complex and, according to the procedure outlined as follows in Scheme 5, we were able to synthesize the derivative 1b.
We started with the amino group protection as carbamate, obtaining the derivative 10 from 5 using di-tert-butyl dicarbonate in MeOH/H2O, in the presence of NaHCO3 as the base. Then, the selective C3-hydroxylation with IBX was performed to achieve the tert-butyl (3,4-dihydroxyphenethyl)carbamate 11, which was subjected to protection as acetonide, giving compound 12. In the subsequent step, the regioselective chlorination was achieved to afford tert-butyl (2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate 13, which was finally subjected to the last step for the further nitrogen protection for obtaining compound 1b.
Once isolated, derivative 1b underwent the Suzuki reaction in the same condition used for the previous attempt, and pleasingly we observed the formation of the desired cross-coupling product 3ba in good yields (90%) (Scheme 6).
Based on this encouraging result, the reaction was then extended to various aryl boronic acids 2, to obtain a collection of new 6-arylated dopamine derivatives (Table 1).
Table 1. Synthesis of 6-arylated dopamine derivatives via Suzuki cross-coupling a.
Table 1. Synthesis of 6-arylated dopamine derivatives via Suzuki cross-coupling a.
Catalysts 14 00401 i001
Entry2ArTime (h)3Yield (%) b
12aPh33ba90
22b4-COMe-C6H493bb68
32c4-MeO-C6H413bc87
42d2-Me-C6H453bd85
52e4-F-3-Me-C6H34.53be52
62f4-Me-C6H4213bf67
72g2,6-(MeO)2-C6H373bg-
82h2-CHO-C6H473bh10 c
92i3-CHO-C6H473bi67 d
102j4-CHO-C6H4243bj40 e
112k3-thiophene73bk-
122l3-MeO2C-C6H473bl90
132m4-MeO2C-C6H4313bm60 f
142n4-(C6H5)-C6H42.53bn70
152o1-naphthalene4.53bo60
162p4-Cl-C6H49.53bptraces
a Reactions were carried out on a 0.30 mmol scale using 1.5 equiv. of boronic acid 2, 0.02 equiv. of Pd2dba3, 0.04 equiv. of Sphos, and 3.0 equiv. of anhydrous K3PO4 in 2.5 mL of 1,4 dioxane at 100 °C under nitrogen. b Yields are given for isolated compounds. c Compound 3bh’ (see Figure 1) was isolated in 51% yield. d 16% of 1b recovered. e 11% of 1b was recovered along with 21% of the corresponding reduction product 1b’ (see Figure 1). f 20% of 1b recovered.
Figure 1. Structure of compounds 3bh’, obtained through the Cannizzaro-type reaction on the (2-formylphenyl)boronic acid in the reaction conditions, and 1b’, obtained via reduction of the starting material.
Figure 1. Structure of compounds 3bh’, obtained through the Cannizzaro-type reaction on the (2-formylphenyl)boronic acid in the reaction conditions, and 1b’, obtained via reduction of the starting material.
Catalysts 14 00401 g001
The preparative results showed that the aryl derivatives 3 could be easily obtained in good yield under the reported reaction conditions, resulting in them being compatible with the use of boronic acids bearing different functional groups, including aldehyde, ketone, esters, ethers, and fluorine (entries 1–6, 9–10, 12–15).
Steric hindrance at the ortho position of the boronic acid was tolerated to some extent. To this regard, it is worth noting that, while the reaction of 1b with the o-tolyl boronic acid proceeded smoothly with good yield (entry 4), in the presence of the more hindered 2,6-dimethoxyphenylboronic acid, the formation of the final compound 3bg was not observed in traces either, and the starting material 1b was recovered in the almost quantitative yield (entry 7). On the other hand, the low yield observed using the 2-formylphenylboronic acid (entry 8) could be determined by the occurrence of a Cannizzaro-type reaction, helped by the ortho borate group that converts the 2-formylphenylboronic acid (2h) into 2-hydroxymethylphenylboronic acid. Indeed, in this case, along with the 10% of compound 3bh, 51% of 3bh’ was isolated (Table 1 entry 8 and Figure 1) with a cross-coupling overall yield of 61%.
Only traces of 3bp were obtained using the 4-chlorophenyl boronic acid 2p (entry 15). This result was explained by the low selectivity of the cross-coupling reaction in the presence of the chlorinated boronic acid 2p, which is consumed during the reaction, giving dimeric species as side products.
Afterward, having investigated the generality and the scope of the reaction, we turned our attention to the protecting groups’ removal. As reported in Scheme 7, our studies demonstrated the possibility of selectively deprotecting the amino group and/or the catechol moiety, with the results of producing three kinds of dopamine derivatives 4a, 5a, and 6a.
Each protocol appeared simple and allowed for the isolation in a good yield of compounds of interest, both for their potential biological activity and for further functionalization reactions.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

All the commercially available reagents, catalysts, bases, and solvents were used as purchased, without further purification. Pd2(dba)3 97% (CAS: 51364-51-3) was obtained from Merck Science Life s.r.l. (Milan, Italy) Starting materials were purified on axially compressed columns, packed with SiO2 (25–40 μm), connected to a solvent-delivery system and a refractive-index detector, eluting with n-hexane/EtOAc mixtures. Compounds 3ba-bo were purified by flash chromatography, using SiO2 as the stationary phase and eluting with an n-hexane/ethyl acetate mixture. When necessary, to obtain suitable NMR spectra, compounds 3 were further purified using a semi-preparative HPLC system (column: Nucleosil 100-7 Macherey Nagel, (Dueren, Germany) and eluted with an n-hexane/ethyl acetate mixture. 1H NMR (400.13 MHz) and 13C NMR (100.6 MHz), were recorded with a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer (Bruker Italia Srl, Milan, Italy). Splitting patterns are designed as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), m (multiplet), or br s (broad singlet). Copies of the NMR spectra are included in Supplementary Materials. HRMS were recorded in positive ion mode on a Thermo Fisher Orbitrap Exactive Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Melting points were determined with a Büchi B-545 apparatus and are uncorrected.

3.2. Synthetic Procedures

3.2.1. Procedure for the Preparation of 7 or 11

Step 1. To a solution of 4-(2-aminoethyl)phenol 5 (5.0 mmol, 0.885 g, 1.0 equiv) in methanol 5.0 mL and water 2.5 mL, NaHCO3 (5.0 mmol, 0.420 g, 1.0 equiv) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min before adding dimethyl carbonate (6.0 mmol, 0.541 g, 1.2 equiv.) or di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (6.0 mmol, 1.31 g, 1.2 equiv). The reaction was stirred for 2 h, monitoring the disappearance of the starting material by TLC. After this time, the reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O, and washed with water and brine. Then, the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford methyl (4-hydroxyphenethyl)carbamate 6 or tert-butyl (4-hydroxyphenethyl)carbamate 10, which were used without further purification in the next step.
Step 2. A round bottom balloon equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with methyl (4-hydroxyphenethyl)carbamate 6 or tert-butyl (4-hydroxyphenethyl)carbamate 10 (4.2 mmol, 1.0 g) and MeOH (100 mL). The mixture was cooled at 0 °C before adding IBX (5.02 mmol, 1.4 g), and stirred for 3 h. After this time the reaction was allowed to warm at room temperature, a solution of Na2S2O4 (5.02 mmol, 0.87 g in 50 mL of water) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min. Then, the mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure, the residue solubilized with AcOEt, and washed with a saturated solution of NaHCO3 and with brine. Then, the organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (25–40 μm), eluting with a 75/25 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt mixture (Rf = 0.24) to afford 0.435 g of 7 (49% yield, over two steps from compound 5) or 0.904 g of tert-butyl (3,4-dihydroxyphenethyl)carbamate 11 (85% yield). The spectral data for compound 7 were identical to those reported in the literature [20]. Compound 11 was used without further purification in the subsequent step.

3.2.2. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 1a

Step 1. Under a nitrogen atmosphere, a two-necked round bottom balloon equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with methyl (3,4-dihydroxyphenethyl)carbamate 7 (3.5 mmol, 0.739 g), 2,2-dimethoxypropane (31.5 mmol, 3.3 g), TsOH (0.7 mmol, 0.120 g), and dry CHCl3 (30 mL). The resulting mixture was warmed at 70 °C and stirred overnight at 70 °C. Then, the reaction mixture was cooled at room temperature, neutralized with a saturated solution of NaHCO3, and extracted with CHCl3. The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product methyl (2-(2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (8) was used without further purification in the subsequent step.
Step 2. To a solution of the crude 8 in dichloromethane 7.0 mL, N-chlorosuccinimide (3.5 mmol, 465.5 mg) and aluminum trichloride (0.35 mmol, 46.7 mg) were added. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature, monitoring by HPLC (Jasco Europe s.r.l., Cremella, Italy) (Column details: NUCLEODUR Sphinx RP (Macherey Nagel, Dueren, Germany; flow: 1 mL/min; mobile phase: CH3CN/H2O 9:1 v/v, Merck Science Life s.r.l., Milan, Italy). After 1 hour the disappearance of the starting material was detected, and the reaction mixture was concentrated at reduced pressure, diluted with Et2O, and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (25–40 μm), eluting with a 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt mixture (Rf = 0.21) to obtain 214 mg (50% yield) of 1a.
Compound 1a. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.72 (s, 1H), 6.57 (s, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.43–3.34 (m, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.2, 147.0, 146.7, 128.7, 125.0, 119.2, 110.2, 109.8, 52.2, 41.1, 33.9, 25.9. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 286.0843 [M + H]+ (calcd for C13H15ClNO4+, 286.0841), 308.0659 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C13H16ClNNaO4+, 308.0660).

3.2.3. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 13

Step 1. Under a nitrogen atmosphere, a two-necked round bottom balloon equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with tert-butyl (3,4-dihydroxyphenethyl)carbamate 11 (3.5 mmol, 0.886 g), 2,2dimethoxypropane (31.5 mmol, 3.3 g), TsOH (0.7 mmol, 0.120 g), and dry CHCl3 (30 mL). The resulting mixture was warmed at 70 °C and stirred overnight at 70 °C. Then, the reaction mixture was cooled at room temperature, neutralized with a saturated solution of NaHCO3, and extracted with CHCl3. The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain crude tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate 12, which was used without further purification in the subsequent step.
Step 2. To a solution of crude tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate 12 in dichloromethane 7.0 mL, N-chlorosuccinimide (3.5 mmol, 465.5 mg) and aluminum trichloride (0.15 mmol, 20.0 mg) were added. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature, monitoring by HPLC (NUCLEODUR Sphinx RP columns, 5 mL, mobile phase CH3CN/H2O 9:1 v/v). After 1 hour the disappearance of the starting material was detected, and the reaction mixture was concentrated at reduced pressure, diluted with Et2O, and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (25–40 μm), eluting with a 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt mixture (Rf = 0.22) to obtain 443.1 mg (90% yield) of 13.
tert-butyl (2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (13): yellow solid; m.p. 115–116 °C; Rf = 0.21 (n-hexane-EtOAc, 90:10); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.72 (s, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 3.35–3.29 (m, 2H), 2.81 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (s, 6H), 1.43 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.3, 146.9, 146.6, 128.9, 125.2, 119.1, 110.5, 109.6, 82.3, 46.2, 33.2, 28.2, 25.9. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 328.1313 [M + H]+ (calcd for C16H23ClNO4+, 328.1310), 350.1132 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C16H22ClNNaO4+, 350.1130).

3.2.4. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 1b

To a solution of tert-butyl (2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate 13 (1.2 mmol, 400.0 mg) in CH3CN 12.0 mL, DMAP (1.2 mmol, 146.6 mg) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (1.8 mmol, 392.7 mg) were added. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min and then heated at 70 °C. The reaction was stirred for 4 hours, monitoring the disappearance of the starting material by TLC. After this time, the reaction mixture was cooled at room temperature, diluted with AcOEt, and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (25–40 μm), eluting with a 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt mixture (Rf = 0.24) to afford 374.5 mg (73% yield) of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate 1b.
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate 1b: m.p. 74.7–74.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 3.77 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.64 (s, 6H), 1.18 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.3, 146.9, 146.6, 128.9, 125.2, 119.1, 110.5, 109.6, 82.3, 46.2, 33.2, 28.2, 25.9. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 428.1833 [M + H]+ (calcd for C21H31ClNO6+, 428.1834), 450.1656 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C21H31NNaO6+, 450.1654).

3.2.5. Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 3ba

A carousel reaction tube (Radleys Discovery, Radleys, Shire Hill, United Kingdom), equipped with a magnetic stirrer, was charged with Pd2dba3 (0.006 mmol, 5.5 mg,), Sphos (0.012 mmol, 4.9 mg) and 1,4-dioxane (2.0 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere at room temperature for 10 min before adding 1b (0.3 mmol, 128.4 mg, 1.0 equiv) phenyl boronic acid 2a (0.45 mmol, 54.8 mg, 1.5 equiv), and anhydrous potassium triphosphate (191.0 mg, 0.9 mmoli, 3 equiv). The mixture was warmed at 100 °C and stirred under nitrogen until the disappearance of starting material. Then, the mixture was cooled at room temperature, diluted with AcOEt, and washed with brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on SiO2 (25–40 μm), eluting with a 95/5 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt mixture (Rf = 0.24) to obtain 126.7 mg (90% yield) of 3ba.
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3ba): m.p. 98.0–98.4 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38–7.20 (m, 5H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 6.56 (s, 1H), 3.64 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.72 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (s, 6H), 1.37 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.4, 146.9, 145.8, 141.8, 135.2, 129.7, 129.1, 128.2, 126.7, 118.0, 110.1, 109.4, 82.1, 47.7, 32.2, 28.1, 26.0. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 470.2535 [M + H]+ (calcd for C27H36NO6+, 470.2537), 492.2353 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C27H35NNaO6+, 492.2357).

3.2.6. Preparation of tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (4a)

tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3ba) (0.21 mmol, 100 mg) was dissolved in 5 mL of a solution of methanol/dichloromethane 8/2 v/v, and trifluoroacetic acid (0.42 mmol, 48 mg) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 12 h, monitoring the reaction by TLC, (Macherey Nagel, Dueren, Germany) until the disappearance of starting material. The solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 (25–40 μm), eluting with a 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.22) to obtain 66.0 mg (85% yield) of 4a.
tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (4a). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.35–7.12 (m, 5H), 6.60 (s, 1H), 6.52 (s, 1H), 3.13–3.04 (m, 2H), 2.57 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.62 (s, 6H), 1.32 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.8, 147.0, 145.9, 141.8, 135.2, 129.6, 128.3, 126.9, 118.1, 110.2, 109.3, 79.2, 41.7, 33.2, 28.5, 26.1. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 370.2015 [M + H]+ (calcd for C22H28NO4+, 370.2013), 392.1833 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C22H27NNaO4+, 392.1832).

3.2.7. Preparation of 2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethanamine (5a)

tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3ba) (0.21 mmol, 100 mg) was dissolved in 5 mL of a solution of methanol/dichloromethane 8/2 v/v, and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate was added (0.42 mmol, 80 mg) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 24 h, monitoring the reaction by TLC, until the disappearance of starting material. The solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was diluted with ethyl acetate, and the organic layer was washed with sodium bicarbonate saturated solution and then with brine. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was filtered on a pad of SiO2 (25–40 μm), eluting with dichloromethane to obtain 49.2 mg (87% yield) of 5a.
2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethanamine (5a). Waxy solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.34–7.15 (m, 5H), 6.60 (s, 1H), 6.53 (s, 1H), 2.74–2.64 (m, 2H), 2.58 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 146.9, 145.7, 142.0, 135.2, 129.8, 129.6, 128.3, 126.8, 118.1, 110.2, 109.2, 43.5, 36.9, 26.0. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 270.1491 [M + H]+ (calcd for C17H20NO2+, 270.1489), 292.1309 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C17H19NNaO2+, 292.1308).

3.2.8. Preparation of 6-(2-aminoethyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3,4-diol (6a)

tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3ba) (0.21 mmol, 100 mg) was dissolved in 5 mL of a solution of acetonitrile/water 8/2 v/v, and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate was added (0.42 mmol, 80 mg) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 48 h, monitoring the reaction by TLC, until the disappearance of starting material. The solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was diluted with ethyl acetate, and the organic layer was washed with sodium bicarbonate saturated solution and then with brine. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was filtered on a pad of celite (25–40 μm), eluting with dichloromethane to obtain 43.3 mg (90% yield) of 6a.
6-(2-aminoethyl)-[1,1’-biphenyl]-3,4-diol (6a). Waxy solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.41–7.19 (m, 5H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 2.61 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.50 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 144.6, 143.3, 141.6, 132.5, 129.2, 129.1, 128.1, 126.3, 117.2, 116.6, 42.6, 34.6. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 230.1178 [M + H]+ (calcd for C14H16NO2+, 230.1176), 252.0996 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C14H15NNaO2+, 252.0995).

3.3. Characterization Data

Characterization Data of Compounds 9, 1b′ and 3bbbo
Compound 9. 95/5 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.22); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43 (s, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 4.12–3.67 (m, 5H), 3.00 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.6, 146.7, 143.1, 136.5, 122.1, 118.2, 105.0, 98.0, 52.5, 48.1, 27.7, 25.8. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 250.1072 [M + H]+ (calcd for C13H16NO4+, 250.1074), 272.0892 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C13H15NNaO4+, 272.0893).
tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (1b′). 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.22); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.60–6.49 (m, 3H), 3.69–3.61 (m, 2H), 2.73–2.65 (m, 2H), 1.58 (s, 6H), 1.43 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.5, 147.6, 146.1, 132.1, 121.4, 117.8, 109.3, 108.2, 82.3, 48.3, 35.4, 28.2, 26.0. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 252.1230 [M + H]+ (calcd for C13H18NO4+, 252.1230), 274,1051 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C13H17NNaO4+, 274.1050).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-acetylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bb). 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.21); m.p. 121–122 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.01–7.94 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.35 (m, 2H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 6.57 (s, 1H), 3.66 (t, J = 8.0, 2H), 2.73 (t, J = 8.0, 2H), 2.61 (s, 3H), 1.68 (s, 6H), 1.39 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.9, 152.4, 147.4, 146.9, 146.1, 135.6, 134.0, 130.0, 129.2, 128.4, 118.3, 109.7, 109.7, 82.2, 47.6, 32.2, 28.0, 26.7, 26.1. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 512.2644 [M + H]+ (calcd for C29H38NO7+, 512.2643), 534.2465 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C29H37NNaO7+, 534.2462).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bc). 95/5 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.21); m.p. 99.0–99.8 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.24–7.16 (m, 2H), 6.95–6.88 (m, 2H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.70–3.62 (m, 2H), 2.78–2.70 (m, 2H), 1.68 (s, 6H), 1.41 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.5, 152.4, 146.7, 145.8, 134.8, 134.2, 130.7, 129.2, 117.9, 113.6, 110.2, 109.4, 82.0, 55.3, 47.7, 32.2, 28.1, 26.0. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 500.2641 [M + H]+ (calcd for C28H38NO7+, 500.2643), 522.2461 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C28H37NNaO7+, 522.2462).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(2-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bd). 95/5 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.22); m.p. 78.6–79.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.17 (s, 4H), 6.68 (s, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 3.66 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.68 (s, 6H), 1.40 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.4, 146.8, 145.8, 138.9, 136.3, 135.2, 129.6, 129.2, 129.0, 117.9, 110.1, 109.4, 82.1, 47.8, 32.3, 28.1, 26.1, 21.20. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 484.2696 [M + H]+ (calcd for C28H38NO6+, 484.2694), 506.2514 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C28H37NNaO6+, 506.2513).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3be) 95/5 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.24); m.p. 108.0–109.1 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.14–7.07 (m, 1H), 7.05 (ddd, J = 7.6, 5.1, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.03–6.94 (m, 1H), 6.68 (s, 1H), 6.55 (s, 1H), 3.69–3.61 (m, 2H), 2.76–2.68 (m, 2H), 2.30 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 3H), 1.68 (s, 6H), 1.41 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.8, 152.5, 147.0, 145.9, 137.5, 134.4, 132.8, 129.2, 128.5, 124.6, 124.4, 118.1, 114.8, 114.6, 110.1, 109.5, 82.1, 47.8, 32.3, 28.1, 26.1, 14.7. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 502.2601 [M + H]+ (calcd for C28H37FNO6+, 502.2599), 506.2514 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C28H36FNNaO6+, 524.2419).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bf). 95/5 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.24); m.p. 83.2–84.6 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.17 (s, 4H), 6.68 (s, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 3.65 (t, J = 8.0, 2H), 2.75 (t, J = 8.0, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.68 (s, 6H), 1.40 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.4, 146.8, 145.8, 138.9, 136.3, 135.2, 129.6, 129.2, 128.9, 118.0, 110.1, 109.4, 82.1, 47.8, 32.2, 28.1, 26.1, 21.2. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 484.2694 [M + H]+ (calcd for C28H38NO6+, 484.2694), 506.2512 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C28H37NNaO6+, 506.2513).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(2-formylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bh). 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.21); Waxy solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.81 (s, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 6.53 (s, 1H), 3.68–3.51 (m, 2H), 2.64 (dt, J = 14.3, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.52 (dt, J = 14.0, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.70 (s, 6H), 1.38 (s, 18H). HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 498.2485 [M + H]+ (calcd for C28H36NO7+, 498.2486), 520.2304 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C28H35NNaO7+, 520.2306).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(2-hydroxymethylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bh’). 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.18); Waxy solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (dt, J = 7.2 Hz, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 7.2 Hz, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.47 (s, 1H), 4.50–4.42 (m, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.61–2.54 (m, 2H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.70 (s, 3H), 1.40 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.2, 146.6, 145.5, 140.6, 139.1, 133.1, 129.9, 129.4, 127.5, 127.2, 126.7, 118.4, 109.5, 109.3, 81.8, 61.0, 55.3, 47.1, 32.1, 27.9, 26.1. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 500.2645 [M + H]+ (calcd for C28H38NO7+, 500.2643), 522.2466 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C28H37NNaO7+, 522.2462).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(3-formylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bi) 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.22);. m.p. 132.7–133.6 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.10 (s, 1H), 7.90–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.64–7.53 (m, 2H), 6.74 (s, 1H), 6.62 (s, 1H), 3.74–3.66 (m, 2H), 2.78–2.70 (m, 2H), 1.72 (s, 6H), 1.42 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.6, 152.5, 147.4, 146.2, 142.8, 136.6, 135.8, 133.7, 131.8, 129.3, 129.0, 127.5, 118.4, 109.9, 109.7, 82.2, 47.7, 32.2, 28.2, 26.1. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 498.2487 [M + H]+ (calcd for C28H36NO7+, 498.2486), 520.2306 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C28H35NNaO7+, 520.2306).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-formylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bj). 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.22); m.p. 121.0–122.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.07 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (s, 1H), 6.60 (s, 1H), 3.69 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.76 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.72 (s, 6H), 1.42 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.0, 152.4, 148.4, 147.6, 146.1, 135.0, 133.8, 130.5, 129.7, 129.2, 118.4, 109.8, 109.6, 82.2, 47.6, 32.2, 28.1, 26.1. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 498.2485 [M + H]+ (calcd for C28H36NO7+, 498.2486), 520.2305 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C28H35NNaO7+, 520.2306).
methyl 3-(6-(2-(bis(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)ethyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)benzoate (3bl). 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.24); m.p. 148.8–150.0 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.02–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.38 (m, 2H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.64 (t, J = 8.0, 2H), 2.72 (t, J = 8.0, 2H), 1.69 (s, 6H), 1.38 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.2, 152.4, 147.3, 146.0, 142.1, 134.3, 134.1, 130.8, 130.3, 129.3, 128.4, 128.1, 118.2, 110.02, 110.01, 109.62, 109.61, 82.1, 52.2, 47.7, 32.2, 28.1, 26.1. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 528.2594 [M + H]+ (calcd for C29H38NO8+, 528.2592), 550.2414 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C29H37NNaO8+, 550.2411).
methyl 4-(6-(2-(bis(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)ethyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)benzoate (3bm). 90/10 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.23); m.p. 140.0–141.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 6.56 (s, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.65 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.77–2.69 (m, 2H), 1.68 (s, 6H), 1.39 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.1, 152.4, 147.4, 146.7, 146.0, 134.1, 129.8, 129.6, 129.2, 128.6, 118.3, 109.7, 109.7, 82.2, 52.2, 47.6, 32.2, 28.1, 26.0. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 528.2593 [M + H]+ (calcd for C29H38NO8+, 528.2592), 550.2412 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C29H37NNaO8+, 550.2411).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-([1,1’-biphenyl]-4-yl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bn). 95/5 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.22); m.p. 136.1–137.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65–7.58 (m, 3H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 3.69 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 1.70 (s, 4H), 1.40 (s, 13H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.4, 147.0, 146.0, 141.1, 140.8, 139.7, 134.8, 130.2, 129.2, 128.9, 127.3, 127.2, 127.0, 118.1, 110.1, 109.5, 82.1, 47.9, 32.3, 28.1, 26.1. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 546.2849 [M + H]+ (calcd for C33H40NO6+, 546.2850), 568.2671 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C33H39NNaO6+, 568.2670).
tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(naphtalen-1-yl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bo). 95/5 (v/v) n-hexane/AcOEt (Rf = 0.21); m.p. 121–122 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.84 (dd, J = 15.0, 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.58–7.31 (m, 5H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 6.60 (s, 1H), 3.65–3.48 (m, 2H), 2.66–2.34 (m, 2H), 1.73 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 6H), 1.30 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.3, 147.2, 145.8, 139.3, 133.8, 132.8, 132.8, 130.5, 128.2, 127.6, 126.3, 126.1, 125.8, 125.5, 118.0, 110.7, 109.3, 82.0, 47.7, 32.7, 28.0, 26.1. HRMS (ESI Orbitrap) m/z 520.2696 [M + H]+ (calcd for C31H38NO6+, 520.2694), 542.2512 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C31H37NNaO6+, 542.2513).

4. Conclusions

A new protocol for the synthesis of 6-aryldopamine derivatives from the commercially available 4-(2-aminoethyl)phenol has been developed. The method employed is simple, compatible with a variety of functional groups, and allows for the isolation of various dopamine derivatives protected both at the catechol and amino moieties. The selective protecting group removal has also been achieved: three different protocols have been developed for the deprotection of each function to obtain different derivatives with specific properties for further derivatization reactions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal14070401/s1, Figure S1;1H NMR of Methyl (2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate; Figure S2: 13C NMR of Methyl (2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate; Figure S3: 1H NMR of Methyl 2,2-dimethyl-6,7-dihydro-5H-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-f]indole-5-carboxylate (9); Figure S4: 13C NMR of Methyl 2,2-dimethyl-6,7-dihydro-5H-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-f]indole-5-carboxylate (9); Figure S5: DEPT 135 NMR of methyl 2,2-dimethyl-6,7-dihydro-5H-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-f]indole-5-carboxylate (9); Figure S6: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (13); Figure S7: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (13); Figure S8: 1H NMR of (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (1b); Figure S9: 13C NMR of (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-chloro-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (1b); Figure S10: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (1b’); Figure S11: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (1b’); Figure S12: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3ba); Figure S13: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3ba); Figure S14: 1 H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-acetylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bb); Figure S15: 13 C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-acetylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bb); Figure S16: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3] dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bc); Figure S17: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bc); Figure S18: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(2-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bd); Figure S19: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(2-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bd); Figure S20: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3be); Figure S21: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3be); Figure S22: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bf); Figure S23: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bf); Figure S24: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(2-formylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bh); Figure S25: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(2-hydroxymethylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bh’); Figure S26: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(2-hydroxymethylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bh’); Figure S27: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(3-formylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bi); Figure S28: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(3-formylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bi); Figure S29: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-formylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bj); Figure S30: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(4-formylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]d ioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bj); Figure S31: 1H NMR of methyl 3-(6-(2-(bis(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)ethyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)benzoate (3bl); Figure S32: 13C NMR of methyl 3-(6-(2-(bis(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)ethyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)benzoate (3bl); Figure S33: 1H NMR of methyl 4-(6-(2-(bis(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)ethyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)benzoate (3bm); Figure S34: 13C NMR of methyl 4-(6-(2-(bis(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)ethyl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)benzoate (3bm); Figure S35: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-([1,1’-biphenyl]-4-yl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bn); Figure S36: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-([1,1’-biphenyl]-4-yl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bn); Figure S37: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(naphtalen-1-yl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bo); Figure S38: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (tert-butoxycarbonyl)(2-(6-(naphtalen-1-yl)-2,2-dimethylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (3bo); Figure S39: 1H NMR of tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (4a); Figure S40: 13C NMR of tert-butyl (2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethyl)carbamate (4a); Figure S41: 1H NMR of 2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethanamine (5a); Figure S42: 13C NMR of 2-(2,2-dimethyl-6-phenylbenzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)ethanamine (5a); Figure S43: 1H NMR of 6-(2-aminoethyl)-[1,1’-biphenyl]-3,4-diol (6a); Figure S44: 13C NMR of 6-(2-aminoethyl)-[1,1’-biphenyl]-3,4-diol (6a).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.F. and R.B.; methodology, A.C. and A.I.; investigation, F.M. and S.F.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, G.F., A.G. and R.B.; supervision, A.I.; project administration, G.F.; funding acquisition, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Sapienza University of Rome, Progetti di Ateneo 2023, grant number: RM123188E878DAAB.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the Sapienza University of Rome and the Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bozarth, M. Dopaminergic Pathways and Addiction. In The Sage Encyclopedia of Abnormal and Clinical Psychology; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 1178–1182. [Google Scholar]
  2. Klein, M.O.; Battagello, D.S.; Cardoso, A.R.; Hauser, D.N.; Bittencourt, J.C.; Correa, R.G. Dopamine: Functions, Signaling, and Association with Neurological Diseases. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 39, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bhatia, A.; Lenchner, J.R.; Saadabadi, A. Biochemistry, Dopamine Receptors. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  4. Reid, P.R.; Thompson, W.L. The clinical use of dopamine in the treatment of shock. Johns Hopkins Med. J. 1975, 137, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lan, Y.L.; Li, S.; Lou, J.C.; Ma, X.C.; Zhang, B. The potential roles of dopamine in traumatic brain injury: A preclinical and clinical update. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 2616–2631. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Vincent, J.-L.; Carvalho, F.B.d.; Backer, D.D. Management of Septic Shock. Ann. Med. 2002, 34, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gillies, M.; Bellomo, R.; Doolan, L.; Buxton, B. Bench-to-bedside review: Inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery—A systematic literature review. Crit. Care 2004, 9, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yen, G.-C.; Hsieh, C.-L. Antioxidant Effects of Dopamine and Related Compounds. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1646–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, J.; Mori, A. Monoamine metabolism provides an antioxidant defense in the brain against oxidant- and free radical-induced damage. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1993, 302, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Goldberg, A.M.; Robinson, M.K.; Starr, E.S.; Marasco, R.N.; Alana, A.C.; Cochrane, C.S.; Klugh, K.L.; Strzeminski, D.J.; Du, M.; Colabroy, K.L.; et al. L-DOPA Dioxygenase Activity on 6-Substituted Dopamine Analogues. Biochemistry 2021, 60, 2492–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bigler, D.J.; Peterson, L.W.; Cafiero, M. Effects of implicit solvent and relaxed amino acid side chains on the MP2 and DFT calculations of ligand–protein structure and electronic interaction energies of dopaminergic ligands in the SULT1A3 enzyme active site. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2015, 1051, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hatstat, A.K.; Morris, M.; Peterson, L.W.; Cafiero, M. Ab initio study of electronic interaction energies and desolvation energies for dopaminergic ligands in the catechol-O-methyltransferase active site. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2016, 1078, 146–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Belitsky, J.M.; Lye, D.S.; Gittleman, H.R.; Gorlin, T.A.; Gorham, A.N.; Moore, C.A.; Chaves, M.B.; Ellowitz, M.Z. Colorimetric metal ion binding of catechol-based coatings inspired by melanin and molecular imprinting. Supramol. Chem. 2014, 26, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moulay, S. Dopa/Catechol-Tethered Polymers: Bioadhesives and Biomimetic Adhesive Materials. Polym. Rev. 2014, 54, 436–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, H.; Jia, Y.; Peng, H.; Li, J. Recent developments in dopamine-based materials for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 252, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Arcadi, A.; Fabrizi, G.; Goggiamani, A.; Iazzetti, A.; Iavarone, F.; Marrone, F.; Mazzoccanti, G.; Sferrazza, A. Synthesis of 9,10-Dibenzoyl-phenanthrene Derivatives Through a Palladium-Catalyzed Domino Approach. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2023, 365, 3277–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iazzetti, A.; Arcadi, A.; Dessalvi, S.; Fabrizi, G.; Goggiamani, A.; Marrone, F.; Serraiocco, A.; Sferrazza, A.; Ullah, K. Synthesis of Polysubstituted 1,2-Dihydro-3H-pyrrolo[1,2-a]indol-3-ones through Domino Palladium-Catalyzed Reactions of Indol-2-ylmethyl Acetates with 1,3-Dicarbonyl Derivatives. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arcadi, A.; Calcaterra, A.; Chiarini, M.; Fabrizi, G.; Fochetti, A.; Goggiamani, A.; Iazzetti, A.; Marrone, F.; Marsicano, V.; Serraiocco, A. Synthesis of Indole/Benzofuran-Containing Diarylmethanes through Palladium-Catalyzed Reaction of Indolylmethyl or Benzofuranylmethyl Acetates with Boronic Acids. Synthesis 2022, 54, 741–753. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bernini, R.; Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G.; Filisti, E. 2-Arylhydroxytyrosol Derivatives via Suzuki−Miyaura Cross-Coupling. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3457–3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ito, Y.; Ushitora, H. Trapping of carbamic acid species with (trimethylsilyl)diazomethane. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. (a) Our previous work. (b) This work.
Scheme 1. (a) Our previous work. (b) This work.
Catalysts 14 00401 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the starting material 1a.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the starting material 1a.
Catalysts 14 00401 sch002
Scheme 3. Reaction of compound 1a in the Suzuki coupling conditions.
Scheme 3. Reaction of compound 1a in the Suzuki coupling conditions.
Catalysts 14 00401 sch003
Scheme 4. Intramolecular palladium-catalyzed N-arylation of derivative 1a.
Scheme 4. Intramolecular palladium-catalyzed N-arylation of derivative 1a.
Catalysts 14 00401 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthetic protocol for the synthesis of compound 1b.
Scheme 5. Synthetic protocol for the synthesis of compound 1b.
Catalysts 14 00401 sch005
Scheme 6. Reaction of compound 1b with phenylboronic acid in the Suzuki conditions.
Scheme 6. Reaction of compound 1b with phenylboronic acid in the Suzuki conditions.
Catalysts 14 00401 sch006
Scheme 7. Conditions for the selective protecting groups’ removal.
Scheme 7. Conditions for the selective protecting groups’ removal.
Catalysts 14 00401 sch007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calcaterra, A.; Fernández García, S.; Marrone, F.; Bernini, R.; Fabrizi, G.; Goggiamani, A.; Iazzetti, A. Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of 6-aryl Dopamine Derivatives. Catalysts 2024, 14, 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14070401

AMA Style

Calcaterra A, Fernández García S, Marrone F, Bernini R, Fabrizi G, Goggiamani A, Iazzetti A. Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of 6-aryl Dopamine Derivatives. Catalysts. 2024; 14(7):401. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14070401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calcaterra, Andrea, Santiago Fernández García, Federico Marrone, Roberta Bernini, Giancarlo Fabrizi, Antonella Goggiamani, and Antonia Iazzetti. 2024. "Palladium-Catalyzed Synthesis of 6-aryl Dopamine Derivatives" Catalysts 14, no. 7: 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14070401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop