Management on Transfer Pricing of Farmland Based on the Supply–Demand Mismatches for Multifunction: A Case Study from China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Analyses
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Data Collection and Processing
3.3. Research Methodology
3.4. Evaluation of Supply and Demand for Multifunctional Farmland
3.4.1. Farmland Production Function
3.4.2. Farmland Living Function
3.4.3. Farmland Ecological Function
3.5. Multifunctional Supply and Demand Division of Farmland
3.6. Impact of Farmland Price on the Supply–Demand Relationships of Farmland Multifunction
4. Results
4.1. Analysis of the Spatial Pattern of the Match between Supply and Demand for Multifunctional Farmland
4.2. Impact of Multifunctional Farmland Supply–Demand Matching on Farmland Transfer Prices
4.3. Functional Zoning of Farmland Based on the Analysis of the Relationship between Multifunctional Supply and Demand of Farmland and Farmland Transfer Price
5. Discussion
5.1. Spatial Patterns of Farmland Multifunction Supply–Demand Matching
5.2. Analysis of the Impact of Supply–Demand Mismatch on Farmland Transfer Prices
5.3. Pricing Management of Farmland Transfer Based on Functional Zoning
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Bank Open Data. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org (accessed on 22 July 2024).
- World Population 2024|Population Clock Live. Available online: https://countrymeters.info/en/World (accessed on 22 July 2024).
- Song, X.; Huang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Ouyang, Z. Does Cultivated Land Function Transition Occur in China? J. Geogr. Sci. 2015, 25, 817–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, G.H.; Wang, M.Z.; Qu, Y.B.; Zhou, D.Y.; Ma, W.Q. Towards Cultivated Land Multifunction Assessment in China: Applying the “Influencing Factors-Functions-Products-Demands” Integrated Framework. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Morelli, F. High Nature Value Farmland Increases Taxonomic Diversity, Functional Richness and Evolutionary Uniqueness of Bird Communities. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 90, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grassauer, F.; Herndl, M.; Nemecek, T.; Fritz, C.; Guggenberger, T.; Steinwidder, A.; Zollitsch, W. Assessing and Improving Eco-Efficiency of Multifunctional Dairy Farming: The Need to Address Farms’ Diversity. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 338, 130627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernués, A.; Tello-García, E.; Rodríguez-Ortega, T.; Ripoll-Bosch, R.; Casasús, I. Agricultural Practices, Ecosystem Services and Sustainability in High Nature Value Farmland: Unraveling the Perceptions of Farmers and Nonfarmers. Land Use Policy 2016, 59, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šatalová, B.; Špulerová, J.; Štefunková, D.; Dobrovodská, M.; Vlachovičová, M.; Kozelová, I. Monitoring and Evaluating the Contribution of the Rural Development Program to High Nature Value Farmland Dominated by Traditional Mosaic Landscape in Slovakia. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 126, 107661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Rejesus, R.M.; Aglasan, S.; Hagen, S.; Salas, W. The Impact of No-till on Agricultural Land Values in the United States Midwest. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2023, 105, 760–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awasthi, M.K. Socioeconomic Determinants of Farmland Value in India. Land Use Policy 2014, 39, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heringa, P.W.; van der Heide, C.M.; Heijman, W.J.M. The Economic Impact of Multifunctional Agriculture in Dutch Regions: An Input-Output Model. NJAS-Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2013, 64–65, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, W.; Griffith, J.W. Assessing Holistic Economic Value for Multifunctional Agriculture in the US. Food Policy 2011, 36, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fakhirah, J.; Nurhasana, R. The Influence of Agricultural Land Use on the Drivers of Peri-Urban Settlement Formation in Highland Landscapes: A Case Study in the Kayumas Village. Edunity Kaji. Ilmu Sos. Dan Pendidik. 2024, 3, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zasada, I.; Fertner, C.; Piorr, A.; Nielsen, T.S. Peri-Urbanisation and Multifunctional Adaptation of Agriculture around Copenhagen. Geogr. Tidsskr.-Dan. J. Geogr. 2011, 111, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshimura, N.; Hiura, T. Demand and Supply of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Use of Geotagged Photos to Map the Aesthetic Value of Landscapes in Hokkaido. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 24, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burkhard, B.; Kroll, F.; Nedkov, S.; Müller, F. Mapping Ecosystem Service Supply, Demand and Budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; van den Bosch, C.C.K.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Chen, J.; Lin, Y.; Dong, J. China’s Green Space System Planning: Development, Experiences, and Characteristics. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 60, 127017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yushanjiang, A.; Zhang, F.; Tan, M.L. Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Health in Central Asia. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 105, 102635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, D.Y.; Pu, L.J.; Huang, S.; Nie, M.X.; Qie, L.; Zhu, M. Spatial and Temporal Dynamic Analysis of Cultivated Land Multifunction in Jiangsu Province and Its Response to Cultivated Land Change. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2022, 31, 575–587. [Google Scholar]
- Aizaki, H.; Sato, K.; Osari, H. Contingent Valuation Approach in Measuring the Multifunctionality of Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan. Paddy Water Environ. 2006, 4, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grassauer, F.; Herndl, M.; Nemecek, T.; Guggenberger, T.; Fritz, C.; Steinwidder, A.; Zollitsch, W. Eco-Efficiency of Farms Considering Multiple Functions of Agriculture: Concept and Results from Austrian Farms. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 297, 126662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basavalingaiah, K.; Paramesh, V.; Parajuli, R.; Girisha, H.C.; Shivaprasad, M.; Vidyashree, G.V.; Thoma, G.; Hanumanthappa, M.; Yogesh, G.S.; Misra, S.D.; et al. Energy Flow and Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Coffee-Pepper Production Systems: An Evaluation of Conventional, Integrated and Organic Farms in India. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2022, 92, 106687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzilivakis, J.; Warner, D.J.; Holland, J.M. Developing Practical Techniques for Quantitative Assessment of Ecosystem Services on Farmland. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 106, 105514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Hu, W.; Li, M.; Guo, Z.; Wang, L.; Wu, L. Multiscale Research on Spatial Supply-Demand Mismatches and Synergic Strategies of Multifunctional Cultivated Land. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, T.; Qiao, Y.B.; Song, G. Rent Pricing Model for Land Circulation Among Farmers. Res. Financ. Econ. Issues 2020, 12, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
- Stosch, K.C.; Quilliam, R.S.; Bunnefeld, N.; Oliver, D.M. Quantifying Stakeholder Understanding of an Ecosystem Service Trade-Off. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 2524–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Turner, K.G.; Odgaard, M.V.; Bøcher, P.K.; Dalgaard, T.; Svenning, J.-C. Bundling Ecosystem Services in Denmark: Trade-Offs and Synergies in a Cultural Landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 125, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, D.Y.; Li, S.H.; Wen, W.; Jiang, G.H. Multi-Function Evaluation and Optimization of Cultivated Land in Henan Province Based on Perspective of Demand and Supply. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2020, 51, 272–281. [Google Scholar]
- Groot, R. de Function-Analysis and Valuation as a Tool to Assess Land Use Conflicts in Planning for Sustainable, Multi-Functional Landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 75, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.J.; Wang, D.Y.; Wu, S.; Yan, Z.R.; Han, J.Q. Cultivated Land Multifunctionality in Undeveloped Peri-Urban Agriculture Areas in China: Implications for Sustainable Land Management. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 325, 116500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, C.Y.; Zang, J.M. Multi-Functional Evaluation of Cultivated Land and an Analysis of the Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Guangzhou in the New Era. J. Agric. Resour. Environ. 2021, 38, 332–343. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.J.; Yang, H.; Hu, Y.M.; Peng, Y.P.; Liu, L.; Su, S.Q.; Wang, W.; Wu, J.L. Multifunctional Trade-off/Synergy Relationship of Cultivated Land in Guangdong: A Long Time Series Analysis from 2010 to 2030. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 154, 110700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.D.; Lin, L.Q.; Luo, P.P.; Wang, S.N.; Yang, J.; Guan, J. Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Force Analysis of Multi-Functional Coupling Coordinated Development of Cultivated Land. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2022, 38, 260–269. [Google Scholar]
- Niu, H.P.; Zhao, X.M.; Xiao, D.Y.; An, R.; Liu, M.M. Spatial-Temporal Pattern Evolution and Trade-off Relationship of Cultivated Land Multifunction in the Yellow River Basin (Henan Section). Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2022, 38, 223–236. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, Y.T.; Jin, X.B.; Gan, L.; Yang, Q.K.; Wang, L.Z.; Li, Y. Exploring an Integrated Framework for “Dynamic-Mechanism-Clustering” of Multiple Cultivated Land Functions in the Yangtze River Delta Region. Appl. Geogr. 2023, 159, 103061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, S.S.; Lai, Q.S.; Wang, X.D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.F. Control and Management of Cropland Regionalization in Fujian Province of China Using Multi-Functional Evaluation and Trade-off/Synergy Relationships. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2023, 39, 271–280. [Google Scholar]
- Pedro, C.; Marta, C.; Paula, A.; Rui, S.; Jorge Orestes, C.; Martins, M.J. Combining Social Media Photographs and Species Distribution Models to Map Cultural Ecosystem Services: The Case of a Natural Park in Portugal. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 96, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Fang, B.; Li, Y.R.; Qu, L.L.; Li, D.J. Trade-off and Synergy Evolution of Farmland Functions and Its Dynamic Mechanism in the Process of Urbanization. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2022, 38, 244–254. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.Y.; Hu, W.Y.; Zhao, K.; Wang, L.Y. Study on the Coupling and Coordinated Development of Multifunctional Cultivated Land and Agricultural Green Total Productivity. World Agric. 2022, 11, 83–97. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, G.Z.; Shi, L.N.; Wen, Q.; Niu, S.D. Coupling and Coordination of the Multifunction and Value of Arable Land at the Regional Scale from the Perspective of Rural Hollowing Governance. Prog. Geogr. 2024, 43, 587–602. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.J.; Cai, H.S.; Zhang, X.L.; Chen, L.T.; He, Q.G. Multi-Functional Spatiotemporal Evolution of Cultivated Land and Its Driving Mechanisms in Poyang Lake Plain. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2023, 43, 245–253. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, S.Y.; Wang, Z.C. Multi-Function Evolutions of Arable Land and Its Driving Forces Based on Different Functional Types of Cities. Sci. Soil Water Conserv. 2020, 18, 94–102. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X. Research on the Response of Food Security to the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Multifunctional Cultivated Land in Mountain Cities:Taking Chongqing Metropolitan Area as an Example. J. Chongqing Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2024, 41, 37–50. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, F.S.; Hu, X.C. Multi-Functional Intensity and Coordination Degree of Cultivated Land in Hu’nan Province Based on Method of Entire Array Polygon Diagram. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2021, 41, 166–173. [Google Scholar]
- Pang, X.F.; Lu, R.C.; Li, S.Q.; Zhang, L.G.; Pang, Y. Analysis of Multi-Functional Temporal and Spatial Differentiation Pattern and Agglomeration Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Guangxi Border Areas. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plan. 2023, 44, 49–59. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Q.Y.; Zhang, W.K.; Yang, G.Y. Multi-Functional Spatial Differentiation, Trade-off and Synergy of Cultivated Land in Guangdong Province. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2021, 49, 212–218. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Y.N.; Wang, F. Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of Cultivated Land Use Transition and Its Influence Factors in the Pearl River Delta. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2022, 29, 352–361. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.L.; Liu, X.P. Multifunctional Evaluation and Temporal-Spatial Evolution Analysis of Cultivated Land in the Hotan River Basin. J. Chin. Agric. Mech. 2022, 43, 197–204. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.; Yang, R.J.; Li, G. Spatiotemporal variation, influencing factors and spatial spillover of cultivated land multifunction in Zhejiang Province. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2022, 38, 21–32. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, W.Z.; Liu, G.H.; Pan, J.J. Soil Available Water Capacity and It’s Empirical and Statistical Models -with s Special Reference to Black Soils in Northeast China. J. Arid Land Resour. Amp; Environ. 2003, 17, 88–95. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, F.P.; Wei, S.G.; Zhang, J.; Hu, B.F. Depth-to-Bedrock Map of China at a Spatial Resolution of 100 Meters. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Shao, Y.; Hong, M.; Zhu, C.; Dong, B.; Li, Y.; Lin, Y.; Wang, K.; Gan, M.; Zhu, J.; et al. Impact Mechanisms of Urbanization Processes on Supply-Demand Matches of Cultivated Land Multifunction in Rapid Urbanization Areas. Habitat Int. 2023, 131, 102726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, L.G.; Han, X.; Long, H.L.; Zhou, B.B.; Zang, Y.Z.; Wang, J.; Fan, Y.T. Research Progress and Prospects on Supply and Demand Matching of Farmland Multifunctions. Resour. Sci. 2023, 45, 1351–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Zhao, R.; Wang, P. Study on the Sensitivity of Cultivated Land Multifunction to the Changes of Grain Productivity Capacity. J. Nat. Resour. 2024, 39, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Q.H.; Lin, W.X. Analysis of Research Hotspot and Trends in China’s Agricultural Modernization. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2024, 32, 877–895. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.H.; Li, X.B.; Xin, L.J. Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Old-Age Security Function of Cultivated Land Assets for Chinese Farmers in the Past 30 Years and Its Policy Implications. Geogr. Res. 2020, 39, 956–969. [Google Scholar]
- Xiong, C.S.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, Y.J.; Luan, Q.L.; Liu, X. Multi-Function Evaluation and Zoning Control of Cultivated Land in China. China Land Sci. 2021, 35, 104–114. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, G.Z.; Song, G. Study on the Evolution of Cultivated Land Multifunction and Its Value Response in Liaoning Province. China Land Sci. 2022, 36, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, L.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Y.R. The Relationship between Livelihood Capital, Multi-functional Value Perception of Cultivated Land and Farmers’ Willingness to Land Transfer:A Regional Observations in the Period of Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization. China Land Sci. 2022, 36, 56–65. [Google Scholar]
- Xiong, Q.; Zheng, L.; Jiang, J.H. Spatiotemporal differentiation and formation mechanism of arable land function transformation in China. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2024, 63, 94–100+110. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Qian, L. A Study on the Multifunctional Spatial Distribution Pattern and Agglomeration Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Shaanxi Province. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plan. 2024, 1–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wei, Y.F.; Wei, F.; Tong, X.H. Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Multi-Functional Coupling Coordination Degree of Cultivated Land in Zuoyoujiang Old Revolutionary Base Area, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region During 2005—2020. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2023, 43, 174–183. [Google Scholar]
- Baumgartner, P.; von Braun, J.; Abebaw, D.; Müller, M. Impacts of Large-Scale Land Investments on Income, Prices, and Employment: Empirical Analyses in Ethiopia. World Dev. 2015, 72, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.Q.; Wu, Z.F.; Ouyang, Z. Changes of Cultivated Land Function in China since 1949. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2014, 69, 435–447. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, C.; Fan, D. High Cropland Rent: Causes and Policy Implications. J. Sichuan Norm. Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2016, 43, 114–120. [Google Scholar]
- Song, H.F.; Li, X.B.; Xin, L.J.; Wang, X.; Dong, S.J.; He, Y.F. The phenomenon of farmland transfer with zero rent in China’s mountainous areas and its explanation. Geogr. Res. 2023, 42, 2225–2244. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.C.; Jiang, L. Research on Measurement, Pattern and Influencing Factors of Farmland Price in China. China Land Sci. 2022, 36, 53–62. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, Y.; Zhu, D.; Li, Y.; Ji, X.X.; Shi, X. Establishment and verification of the regionalization of cultivated land price in China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2021, 37, 250–257. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; Hu, Y.; Han, X.P.; Guo, X.Y. The Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Food Production and Contributions of Major Grain Production Areas in National Food Security. China Land Sci. 2017, 31, 34–42. [Google Scholar]
Dimension | Data Use | Data Type | Data Year | Data Sources | Data Format |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Farmland Production Function Supply and Demand | Food Supply | Grain Sowing Area | 2014–2021 | China Economic and Social Big Data Research Platform, Statistical Yearbooks of Various Provinces and Cities, Statistical Bulletins | Statistical Data/hectare |
Food Supply | Grain Output | Statistical Data/kilogram | |||
Food Demand | Permanent Population | Statistical Data/person | |||
Food Demand | Per Capita Grain Consumption of Urban Residents | Statistical Data/(kilogram/person) | |||
Food Demand | Per Capita Grain Consumption of Rural Residents | ||||
Food Demand | Urbanization Rate of Provinces and Cities | Statistical Data | |||
Food Demand | Engel Coefficient of Provinces | ||||
Farmland Living Function Supply and Demand | Income Supply | Agricultural Output Value | Statistical Data/10,000 yuan | ||
Income Supply | Rural Population | Statistical Data/person | |||
Income Supply | Minimum Living Security for Rural Residents | Statistical Data (yuan/person) | |||
Income Demand | Per Capita Disposable Income of Urban Residents | ||||
Income Demand | Per Capita Disposable Income of Rural Residents | ||||
Farmland Ecological Function Supply and Demand | Water/Carbon Supply and Demand | Administrative Boundaries | 2023 | Standard Map Service System | Vector Data |
Water/Carbon Supply and Demand | Land Use Data | 2014–2021 | CLCD 1990–2021 National Land Cover Data by Professors Yang Jie and Huang Xin, Wuhan University | Raster Data/30 m | |
Water/Carbon Supply and Demand | Annual Precipitation | National Earth System Science Data Center Shared Service Platform | Raster Data/1 km | ||
Water Supply and Demand/Carbon Supply and Demand | Annual Evapotranspiration | National Earth System Science Data Center Shared Service Platform | |||
Water/Carbon Supply and Demand | Root Restriction Layer Depth | 2014 | Research by Yan | ||
Water/Carbon Supply and Demand | Plant-Available Water Content | 2012 | China Soil Dataset based on the World Soil Database (HWSD) | ||
Water Supply and Demand | Proportion of Three Major Crops Area | 2014–2019 | National Ecosystem Science Data Center | ||
Water Supply and Demand | Water Quota for Three Major Crops | 2021 | Ministry of Water Resources “Agricultural Irrigation Water Quota” | Quota Data | |
Carbon Supply and Demand | Carbon Emissions | 2014–2021 | Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) | Raster Data/0.1° |
Production Function | Living Function | Ecological Function | |
---|---|---|---|
Farmland transfer price in 2014 | −0.162 (0.0251) *** | −0.220 (0.0271) *** | 0.023 (0.0261) |
Farmland transfer price in 2017 | −0.172 (0.0260) *** | −0.209 (0.0264) *** | 0.031 (0.0247) * |
Farmland transfer price in 2021 | −0.220 (0.0263) *** | −0.275 (0.0270) *** | 0.049 (0.0253) ** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wu, L.; Ren, G. Management on Transfer Pricing of Farmland Based on the Supply–Demand Mismatches for Multifunction: A Case Study from China. Land 2024, 13, 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091372
Wu L, Ren G. Management on Transfer Pricing of Farmland Based on the Supply–Demand Mismatches for Multifunction: A Case Study from China. Land. 2024; 13(9):1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091372
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Lijun, and Gaofeng Ren. 2024. "Management on Transfer Pricing of Farmland Based on the Supply–Demand Mismatches for Multifunction: A Case Study from China" Land 13, no. 9: 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091372