Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Pteridine Normalization Methods in Urine for Detection of Bladder Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
A Software Tool for Exploring the Relation between Diagnostic Accuracy and Measurement Uncertainty
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Diagnostic and Prognostic Indications of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

by
Engku Nur Syafirah E. A. R.
1,
Ahmad Adebayo Irekeola
1,2 and
Chan Yean Yean
1,3,*
1
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
2
Department of Biological Sciences, Microbiology Unit, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Summit University Offa, Offa PMB 4412, Kwara State, Nigeria
3
Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2020, 10(9), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090611
Submission received: 12 July 2020 / Revised: 11 August 2020 / Accepted: 18 August 2020 / Published: 19 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a disease that is highly associated with the latent infection of Epstein–Barr virus. The absence of obvious clinical signs at the early stage of the disease has made early diagnosis practically impossible, thereby promoting the establishment and progression of the disease. To enhance the stride for a reliable and less invasive tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of NPC, we synopsize biomarkers belonging to the two most implicated biological domains (oncogenes and tumor suppressors) in NPC disease. Since no single biomarker is sufficient for diagnosis and prognosis, coupled with the fact that the known established methods such as methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex methylation-specific PCR, microarray assays, etc., can only accommodate a few biomarkers, we propose a 10-biomarker panel (KIT, LMP1, PIKC3A, miR-141, and miR-18a/b (oncogenic) and p16, RASSF1A, DAP-kinase, miR-9, and miR-26a (tumor suppressors)) based on their diagnostic and prognostic values. This marker set could be explored in a multilevel or single unified assay for the diagnosis and prognosis of NPC. If carefully harnessed and standardized, it is hoped that the proposed marker set would help transform the diagnostic and prognostic realm of NPC, and ultimately, help prevent the life-threatening late-stage NPC disease.
Keywords: tumor-suppressor gene; oncogene; miRNA; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; tumor biomarker tumor-suppressor gene; oncogene; miRNA; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; tumor biomarker

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

E. A. R., E.N.S.; Irekeola, A.A.; Yean Yean, C. Diagnostic and Prognostic Indications of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090611

AMA Style

E. A. R. ENS, Irekeola AA, Yean Yean C. Diagnostic and Prognostic Indications of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(9):611. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090611

Chicago/Turabian Style

E. A. R., Engku Nur Syafirah, Ahmad Adebayo Irekeola, and Chan Yean Yean. 2020. "Diagnostic and Prognostic Indications of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma" Diagnostics 10, no. 9: 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090611

APA Style

E. A. R., E. N. S., Irekeola, A. A., & Yean Yean, C. (2020). Diagnostic and Prognostic Indications of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Diagnostics, 10(9), 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090611

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop