Next Article in Journal
AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival
Next Article in Special Issue
Synovial Fluid Interleukin Levels Cannot Distinguish between Prosthetic Joint Infection and Active Rheumatoid Arthritis after Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Oral Diseases: Applications and Pitfalls
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/diagnostics12051030
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Do Serum C-Reactive Protein Trends Predict Treatment Outcome in Patients with Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Undergoing Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty?

by
Sheng-Hsun Lee
1,2,3,†,
Chun-Ting Chu
2,†,
Chih-Hsiang Chang
2,3,
Chih-Chien Hu
2,3,
Szu-Yuan Chen
2,3,
Tung-Wu Lu
1 and
Yu-Chih Lin
2,3,*
1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
3
Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1030; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051030
Submission received: 23 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 18 April 2022 / Published: 20 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is the standard treatment for knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aimed to determine whether serial changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) values can predict the prognosis in patients with knee PJI. We retrospectively enrolled 101 patients with knee PJI treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty at our institution from 2010 to 2016. We excluded patients with spacer complications and confounding factors affecting CRP levels. We tested the association between treatment outcomes and qualitative CRP patterns or quantitative CRP levels. Of the 101 patients, 24 (23.8%) had recurrent PJI and received surgical intervention after two-stage reimplantation. Patients with a fluctuating CRP pattern were more likely to receive antibiotics for a longer period (p < 0.001). There was greater risk of treatment failure if the CRP levels were higher when antibiotics were switched from an intravenous to oral form (p = 0.023). The patients who received antibiotics for longer than six weeks (p = 0.017) were at greater risk of treatment failure after two-stage arthroplasty. Although CRP patterns cannot predict treatment outcomes, CRP fluctuation in the interim period was associated with longer antibiotic duration, which was related to a higher treatment failure rate.

1. Introduction

As the number of knee arthroplasties grows, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is becoming one of the most devastating complications, causing 25% of revision surgeries with an incidence between 1% and 2% after primary knee arthroplasty [1,2]. The standard treatment for PJI is surgical debridement of the joint in conjunction with the implantation of an antibiotic-loaded spacer and systemic antibiotics. Although diverse treatment strategies have been introduced in the past decades, the recurrence rate of infection ranges from 11% to 28% after two-stage arthroplasty [3,4,5,6,7,8,9].
Diagnostic criteria of PJI have been established by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), including serum C-reactive protein (CRP). CRP is an acute phase reactant, which elevates in infectious and non-infectious conditions, including rheumatologic diseases, kidney, or liver diseases [10,11,12]. CRP plays an important role in the diagnosis of PJI, yet its trend and correlation with treatment outcome of knee PJI are not fully understood [13,14]. Many studies have shown that serum CRP is a poor predictor for persistent infection and cannot determine the optimal timing of reimplantation [3,6,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. However, previous studies mainly focused on the CRP levels at the time of reimplantation rather than serial changes in CRP levels during the interim period of two-stage surgery, and none of them assessed the potential of using CRP levels as a guide for antibiotic regimens. We have demonstrated that CRP pattern in the interim period of two-stage surgery for hip PJI treatment is associated with treatment outcome [22]. However, the concept has not been proven in knee PJI treatment.
Systemic antibiotic treatment post-resection arthroplasty is widely used to control infection, with a recommended duration of two to six weeks using either intravenous or oral antibiotics [23]. Satisfactory outcomes have been reported with an antibiotic treatment course starting with intravenous administration to achieve desirable concentrations, followed by a switch to oral antibiotics once clinical indicators improve [19,24,25,26]. However, antibiotic regimens have been adjusted mainly depending on the duration of antimicrobial treatment, not the clinical indicators of infection status.
In the current study, we aimed to investigate the following: (1) whether the qualitative CRP patterns or quantitative CRP levels at given time points can predict the treatment outcome; and (2) whether the CRP levels can help determine the duration of antibiotic treatment. This study was necessary because serum CRP trend was an important biomarker yet a subjective observation by clinicians. We hypothesized that a gradual decline in serum CRP without fluctuation in the interim period of two-stage exchange arthroplasty was associated with higher treatment success rates in knee PJI.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Selection

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chang Gung Medical Foundation (#102-1846B) and was exempted from informed consent. We reviewed all patients with knee PJI who received two-stage surgery at our institution from 2010 to 2016. The patient enrollment process is outlined in Figure 1. The diagnostic criteria for knee PJI were defined according to the 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for prosthetic joint infections before resection (Table 1) [27]. All patients with knee PJI who planned to undergo two-stage revision during this time frame were included. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) history of inflammatory disease or autoimmune disease (n = 19); (2) concomitant infection such as urinary tract infection or pneumonia (n = 38); (3) liver cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis, or chronic kidney disease (n = 35); (4) admission to an intensive care unit (n = 6); (5) spacer complications between the two stages, including dislocation, loosening, or breaking of the spacer (n = 33); and (6) incomplete records of CRP levels between resection and reimplantation (n = 45). Among the 101 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 6 patients underwent spacer exchange due to persistent infection in the interim period, 18 patients had recurrent PJI after reimplantation, and 77 patients had their PJI successfully treated. We reviewed age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), microorganism culture results at the resection and reimplantation stages, and serial records of CRP levels. We defined a CCI of greater than 4 points as indicating a poor health condition. Acute PJI is defined as symptoms of PJI persisting for less than four weeks.

2.2. Treatment Protocol

All patients received two-stage surgeries, including removal of the previous prosthesis and bone cement, meticulous debridement, irrigation with 5 L of normal saline solution, and implantation of an antibiotic-loaded articulating spacer during the first stage. The two-stage exchange arthroplasties were performed by fellowship-trained joint reconstruction surgeons in the same institution with similar protocol. We obtained synovial fluid intraoperatively for routine analysis and at least 5 periprosthetic cultures, including tissue cultures and synovial fluid cultures in a blood culture bottle. The spacer was constructed with 40 g polymethylmethacrylate and empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics (4 g of vancomycin and 4 g of ceftazidime). After resection arthroplasty, patients received empirical broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics initially, and the antibiotics regimen would be adjusted according to microbiological culture results. Serum CRP was checked in every patient immediately before resection, every week for 4 weeks after resection, and every 2 weeks until reimplantation. The antibiotics regimen was individualized and depended on the response to treatment. If clinical condition improved or CRP levels declined, we would switch to oral antibiotics or discontinue antibiotic treatment. During the interim period between the two stages, we monitored CRP levels and local infection signs via regular follow-ups. If recurrence of PJI was suspected, the patient would receive debridement and a spacer exchange for further infection control. The timing of reimplantation was decided according to a combination of patient clinical symptoms and the level of serum CRP. After two-stage arthroplasty, patients attended regular follow-ups for at least two years at our outpatient department.

2.3. Definition of CRP Pattern

We defined a CRP trend as a serial change in CRP level and classified trends into five categories according to whether the CRP value dropped to a normal range and the timing of the CRP level normalization (Figure 2 and Figure 3). We used a threshold of 10 mg/L for normal CRP levels and the third week after resection arthroplasty as the defining point for an “ideal” drop or delayed drop in CRP level. The five patterns included: (1) CRP level dropped to the normal range within three weeks; (2) CRP level dropped to the normal range after three weeks; (3) CRP level was never above the normal range; (4) CRP level fluctuated but had been normal at any time point; and (5) CRP level fluctuated and never dropped within the normal range. We also evaluated CRP values at the following given time points: pre-resection, at the discontinuation of intravenous antibiotics, at the discontinuation of all antibiotics, and pre-reimplantation. CRP changes between the four time points were investigated and correlated with treatment outcome.

2.4. Definition of Raecurrent PJI and Treatment Failure

Recurrent or persistent PJI was defined as reinfection after two-stage exchange arthroplasty according to the 2018 MSIS criteria: persistent presentation of sinus tract communication with the joint space and presence of the same microorganism in two intraoperative cultures [27]. The definition of treatment failure was based on the modified Delphi-based criteria: (1) the presence of a sinus tract infection, an unhealed wound or weeping, or infection recurrence caused by the same organism strain; (2) any unplanned surgical intervention, except reimplantation surgery; or (3) occurrence of PJI-related mortality [28].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The primary outcome measure was cure of PJI. We analyzed the correlation between the treatment outcome and factors including patient demographics, microbiologic result, CRP patterns, CRP values at four time points, antibiotic regimens (intravenous and oral), and eventual antibiotic washout before reimplantation. Mann–Whitney U tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used for numerical and categorical comparisons, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the correlation of CRP pattern and treatment outcome. The relationship between either the CRP pattern or type of pathogen and the length of the antibiotic duration was analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. Statistical analysis was conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics (version 22.0, IBM, New York, NY, USA). All tests were two-sided, with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

3. Results

In total, 101 patients with knee PJI were enrolled in this study, 43 of whom were men (43%) with a mean age of 70 years old (ranging from 30 to 80 years old). The mean body weight was 68.76 kg (ranging from 43 to 115.9 kg), and the mean BMI was 28.1 kg/m2 (ranging from 17.2 to 45.2 kg/m2). The patients’ characteristics, microbiology, CRP profiles, and antibiotic duration are listed in Table 2. Sinus tract was present in 24 patients (24%), and multiple sets of positive culture results were noted in 43 patients (43%). Aerobic and anaerobic cultures were obtained from multiple intraoperative samples, and the isolated pathogens were as follows: 36 methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, 10 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 6 other Gram-positive bacteria (including two Staphylococcus capitis, two Streptococcus species, and two Enterococcus species), 7 Gram-negative bacteria (including two Pseudomonas species, 3 Klebsiella species, 2 Serratia marcescens), 4 fungal infections (all Candida species), and 4 mixed florae (including one patient with Streptococcus viridans and Peptostreptococcus micros, one with Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Penicillium species, one with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Klebsiella pneumonia, and one with MRSA and Candida species). No pathogens were isolated in 34 patients. We found that heavier body weight may increase the risk of treatment failure (p = 0.006). However, the microbiology results could not predict the outcome of the two-stage surgery. Overall, infection was successfully eradicated in 77 of 101 patients (77%). The average interim period between the two stages was 14.6 weeks (ranging from 6 to 75 weeks). Six patients received spacer exchange during the interim period; one received spacer exchange due to mycobacterial infection, whereas the others received additional surgery due to signs of persistent infection. The infection was controlled in three of the six patients. Neither the length of the interim period nor receiving interim surgery indicated the outcomes of the two-stage surgery.
Table 2 shows the CRP patterns and CRP values at given time points. Forty-one patients (41%) had their CRP levels drop back to normal within three weeks (type 1), and 42 patients (42%) saw their CRP levels fall within the normal range after three weeks (type 2). Seven patients (7%) showed no elevated of CRP levels (type 3). The remaining seven (7%) and four patients (4%) had fluctuating CRP levels with (type 4) or without (type 5) recorded normal CRP values, respectively. There was no statistically significant correlation between CRP pattern and PJI treatment outcome (p = 0.186). However, there was higher possibility of treatment failure if the patient had type 5 CRP pattern (50.0%) than type 1 (19.5%) or type 2 (21.4%). In addition, the changes in CRP values between given time points showed no significant difference among the treatment success and treatment failure groups. It is worth noting that, when intravenous (IV) antibiotics were discontinued, the CRP levels were significantly higher in the treatment failure group (27.1 mg/L vs. 13.1 mg/L; p = 0.023). The cutoff value when IV antibiotics were discontinued was 29.15 mg/L (Sensitivity: 0.38; Specificity: 0.94; PPV: 64%; NPV: 85%).
The average total antibiotic administration duration was 5.5 weeks (ranging from 0 to 27.5 weeks), and the average length of IV antibiotic use was 2.3 weeks (ranging from 0 to 7.5 weeks). Antibiotic regimens longer than six weeks (odds ratio: 3.086; 95% confidence interval: 1.194–7.979; p = 0.017) and a lack of antibiotic washout before reimplantation surgery (odds ratio: 3.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.09–1.003; p = 0.042) were associated with treatment failure (Table 2).
In addition, the patients with type 4 (p = 0.011) and type 5 CRP patterns (p = 0.026) received longer antibiotic treatment during the interim period compared to patients with type 1 (Table 3), which indicates that we were prone to using antibiotics for a longer time with patients with fluctuating CRP patterns due to the fact that it might be related to a poor response to PJI management. The initial pathogen was not associated with the length of the antibiotic regimen for our patients.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we discovered there was no statistically significant correlation between CRP pattern and treatment outcome of knee PJI. However, the data showed a higher treatment failure rate of patients with type 5 CRP pattern compared with type 1 or type 2. This finding confirmed our impression of CRP interpretation clinically that a gradual decline of CRP correlated to a higher success rate than a fluctuating CRP pattern in terms of PJI treatment.
Several studies have described CRP trends as a critical parameter for assessing PJI treatment response after the first-stage resection in a two-stage exchange arthroplasty [3,5,15,16,21,29]. Previous authors have failed to set a threshold for CRP levels to guide the timing of reimplantation [3,6,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. We found that neither the qualitative CRP patterns nor the quantitative CRP values at given time points during the interim period could predict the outcome of two-stage exchange arthroplasty. In the previous report, we found poor serial CRP response to treatment, namely type 4 and 5 CRP patterns, was an indicator for poor prognosis for patients with hip PJI undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty [22]. Nevertheless, the phenomenon was not evident in the present study, presumably because of a relatively small sample size to reach statistical significance. We did, however, find that type 4 and 5 CRP patterns were associated with longer total antibiotic duration (Table 3), which, in turn, was related to higher failure rate if total antibiotic duration was longer than 6 weeks (Table 2).
Serial CRP level measurement is widely used to monitor the clinical responses of patients with infectious diseases, but few authors have studied the diagnostic value of serial CRP level measurements. Bejon et al. examined 3732 measurements from 260 patients and showed AUC values ranging from 0.55 to 0.65, which indicates that serial CRP level changes cannot accurately predict outcomes [20]. Ghani et al. showed that the CRP preoperative values and at weeks 1, 3, and 6 post-operation were poor indicators of outcomes not only in patients undergoing two-stage surgery but also in patients undergoing one-stage surgery with debridement, implant retention and subsequent antibiotic therapy [30]. Stambough et al. assessed the change in CRP levels between pre-resection and six weeks after intravenous antibiotic treatment, but the change could not accurately determine the timing of reimplantation [21]. We categorized the patterns of serial CRP values into five types to represent different responses to treatment, but these patterns did not predict outcomes after two-stage surgery. However, patterns 4 and 5 (patterns with fluctuating CRP values) were associated with longer antibiotic regimens, which indicates that the patients with poor CRP patterns may need longer antibiotic regimens to control infection due to unsatisfactory management responses.
The antibiotic-loaded spacer and antimicrobial treatment were the main treatments for this two-stage surgery. The 2018 international consensus meeting recommends antibiotic therapy for two to six weeks, either intravenously or orally [23]. Many studies have reported satisfactory outcomes for eradication of infection through even shorter intravenous regimens [4,7,8,24,31,32,33]. Prolonged intravenous antibiotic use may cause more complications, such as catheter-related infections, which can sometimes result in longer admission periods and greater medical expenditures [31,34,35,36,37,38]. Bernard et al. indicated that the length of intravenous antibiotic administration did not change the cure rate of PJI, with a maximum of six weeks of antibiotic therapy [39]. Sandiford et al. showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and the cure rate of PJI [40]. At our institution, we individualized the patients’ antibiotic regimens based on clinical symptoms and laboratory data rather than using a fixed duration for all patients. To our knowledge, there has been no literature discussing the timing for antibiotic shift from IV to oral form. In our study, we found that CRP values when discontinuation of IV antibiotics were related to the outcome of the two-stage surgery. Higher CRP values were related to higher risk of treatment failure. Although the diagnostic power of CRP level during the discontinuation of intravenous antibiotics was not satisfactory, we did provide a potential reference for clinicians to determine the following treatment. If the CRP value is higher than 29.15 mg/dL, it is better to continue IV antibiotics or consider debridement for better infection control.
We also found that heavier body weight, an antibiotic regimen lasting longer than six weeks, and a lack of drug holiday before reimplantation were risk factors for treatment failure after reimplantation surgery. Prolonged antibiotic regimens were related to poor responses to treatment. Although drug holidays are used to allow for emergence of residual infection, Bejon et al. pointed out that the drug holiday was not essential because most of the re-debridement happened when the patients were under antibiotic treatment, and the rate of positive microbiological results during reimplantation were similar between patients with or without drug holidays (13% vs. 16%) [41]. However, a higher risk of treatment failure was seen in our patients without a drug holiday. Elevated CRP values were recorded in only one of 13 patients without drug holiday. The finding was reasonable for this retrospective study because for patients with poor clinical or CRP patterns, we were more prone to keep antibiotics in the interim period.
Based on our findings, clinicians could monitor the serial changes of serum CRP values according to the CRP patterns we proposed, rather than a time-point CRP value, which is easily affected by various conditions. Patients with type 4 and type 5 CRP tended to receive longer antibiotic treatment, yet still higher treatment failure rate. As a result, a different treatment strategy, such as an aggressive and early debridement in the interim period, might be considered.
Our study has several limitations. First, the case number of patients with the type 4 or type 5 patterns was small. This limits the power of this study and increases the difficulty in analyzing the relationship between CRP patterns and outcome. Second, the length of the antibiotic duration was determined by evaluation of clinical condition and laboratory data by different physicians. Although some consensus of clinical practice was established, there remained different views when evaluating the treatment response of our patients. Finally, CRP is a sensitive acute phase reactant, which fluctuates in many clinical scenarios.
We strove to eliminate confounding factors of CRP, such as the same treatment protocol, surgical approach, timing of CRP test, and excluding patients with pre-existing kidney or liver diseases, autoimmune diseases, concomitant infections, and spacer complications [11,22]. However, there were still various uncontrollable factors and systemic conditions that could affect CRP values. This study aimed to provide evidence to verify our long-established practice of using CRP trends as a guide for clinical decisions. Further prospective controlled studies will be needed to better understand CRP trends and their diagnostic power.

5. Conclusions

There was a trend that fluctuating CRP patterns were associated with higher treatment failure rates in patients with knee PJI undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty, although not statistically significant. CRP fluctuation in the interim period was associated with longer antibiotic duration, which was related to higher treatment failure rate. Further prospective studies with larger case numbers are necessary to determine the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.L. and Y.-C.L.; methodology, C.-T.C. and Y.-C.L.; formal analysis, C.-H.C.; data curation, S.-Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-T.C.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.L., T.-W.L., C.-C.H. and Y.-C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Grant number CMRPG3K1351.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation (#102-1846B, approved on 11 June 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study and the anonymous clinical data.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict interests.

References

  1. Kapadia, B.H.; Berg, R.A.; Daley, J.A.; Fritz, J.; Bhave, A.; Mont, M.A. Periprosthetic joint infection. Lancet 2016, 387, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Corvec, S.; Portillo, M.E.; Pasticci, B.M.; Borens, O.; Trampuz, A. Epidemiology and new developments in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2012, 35, 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ghanem, E.; Azzam, K.; Seeley, M.; Joshi, A.; Parvizi, J. Staged revision for knee arthroplasty infection: What is the role of serologic tests before reimplantation? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009, 467, 1699–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Stockley, I.; Mockford, B.J.; Hoad-Reddick, A.; Norman, P. The use of two-stage exchange arthroplasty with depot antibiotics in the absence of long-term antibiotic therapy in infected total hip replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2008, 90, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mortazavi, S.M.; Vegari, D.; Ho, A.; Zmistowski, B.; Parvizi, J. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: Predictors of failure. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011, 469, 3049–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Haleem, A.A.; Berry, D.J.; Hanssen, A.D. Mid-term to long-term followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004, 428, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hart, W.J.; Jones, R.S. Two-stage revision of infected total knee replacements using articulating cement spacers and short-term antibiotic therapy. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2006, 88, 1011–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hoad-Reddick, D.A.; Evans, C.R.; Norman, P.; Stockley, I. Is there a role for extended antibiotic therapy in a two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2005, 87, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ascione, T.; Pagliano, P.; Balato, G.; Mariconda, M.; Rotondo, R.; Esposito, S. Oral Therapy, Microbiological Findings, and Comorbidity Influence the Outcome of Prosthetic Joint Infections Undergoing 2-Stage Exchange. J. Arthroplast. 2017, 32, 2239–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kerner, A.; Avizohar, O.; Sella, R.; Bartha, P.; Zinder, O.; Markiewicz, W.; Levy, Y.; Brook, G.J.; Aronson, D. Association between elevated liver enzymes and C-reactive protein: Possible hepatic contribution to systemic inflammation in the metabolic syndrome. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Kushner, I.; Antonelli, M.J. What should we regard as an “elevated” C-reactive protein level? Ann. Intern. Med. 2015, 163, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Panichi, V.; Migliori, M.; De Pietro, S.; Taccola, D.; Bianchi, A.M.; Norpoth, M.; Metelli, M.R.; Giovannini, L.; Tetta, C.; Palla, R. C reactive protein in patients with chronic renal diseases. Ren. Fail. 2001, 23, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sproston, N.R.; Ashworth, J.J. Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Anemuller, R.; Belden, K.; Brause, B.; Citak, M.; Del Pozo, J.L.; Frommelt, L.; Gehrke, T.; Hewlett, A.; Higuera, C.A.; Hughes, H.; et al. Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Antimicrobials: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J. Arthroplast. 2019, 34, S463–S475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shukla, S.K.; Ward, J.P.; Jacofsky, M.C.; Sporer, S.M.; Paprosky, W.G.; Della Valle, C.J. Perioperative testing for persistent sepsis following resection arthroplasty of the hip for periprosthetic infection. J. Arthroplast. 2010, 25 (Suppl. S6), 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kusuma, S.K.; Ward, J.; Jacofsky, M.; Sporer, S.M.; Della Valle, C.J. What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011, 469, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hoell, S.; Moeller, A.; Gosheger, G.; Hardes, J.; Dieckmann, R.; Schulz, D. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: What is the value of cultures and white cell count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum before second stage reimplantation? Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2016, 136, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. George, J.; Jawad, M.; Curtis, G.L.; Samuel, L.T.; Klika, A.K.; Barsoum, W.K.; Higuera, C.A. Utility of Serological Markers for Detecting Persistent Infection in Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis. J. Arthroplast. 2018, 33, S205–S208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tornero, E.; Morata, L.; Martinez-Pastor, J.C.; Angulo, S.; Combalia, A.; Bori, G.; Garcia-Ramiro, S.; Bosch, J.; Mensa, J.; Soriano, A. Importance of selection and duration of antibiotic regimen in prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and implant retention. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 1395–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Bejon, P.; Byren, I.; Atkins, B.L.; Scarborough, M.; Woodhouse, A.; McLardy-Smith, P.; Gundle, R.; Berendt, A.R. Serial measurement of the C-reactive protein is a poor predictor of treatment outcome in prosthetic joint infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1590–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Stambough, J.B.; Curtin, B.M.; Odum, S.M.; Cross, M.B.; Martin, J.R.; Fehring, T.K. Does Change in ESR and CRP Guide the Timing of Two-stage Arthroplasty Reimplantation? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2019, 477, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Z.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Chang, C.H.; Chen, S.Y.; Lu, T.W.; Lee, S.H. Trend of serum C-reactive protein is associated with treatment outcome of hip Periprosthetic joint infection undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty: A case control study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021, 22, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. de Beaubien, B.; Belden, K.; Bell, K.; Boyle, K.K.; Cordero-Ampuero, J.; Della Valle, C.J.; Eijer, H.; Ferry, C.; Janz, V.; Kessler, B.; et al. Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Antimicrobials: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J. Arthroplast. 2019, 34, S477–S482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Darley, E.S.; Bannister, G.C.; Blom, A.W.; Macgowan, A.P.; Jacobson, S.K.; Alfouzan, W. Role of early intravenous to oral antibiotic switch therapy in the management of prosthetic hip infection treated with one- or two-stage replacement. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 2405–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bassetti, M.; Cadeo, B.; Villa, G.; Sartor, A.; Cainero, V.; Causero, A. Current antibiotic management of prosthetic joint infections in Italy: The ‘Udine strategy’. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69 (Suppl. 1), i41–i45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, S.Y.; Hu, C.C.; Chen, C.C.; Chang, Y.H.; Hsieh, P.H. Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: Mean Follow-Up of Ten Years. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 345475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Parvizi, J.; Tan, T.L.; Goswami, K.; Higuera, C.; Della Valle, C.; Chen, A.F.; Shohat, N. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J. Arthroplast. 2018, 33, 1309–1314.e1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tan, T.L.; Goswami, K.; Fillingham, Y.A.; Shohat, N.; Rondon, A.J.; Parvizi, J. Defining Treatment Success After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J. Arthroplast. 2018, 33, 3541–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saleh, A.; George, J.; Faour, M.; Klika, A.K.; Higuera, C.A. Serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections. Bone Jt. Res. 2018, 7, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ghani, R.; Hutt, J.; Mitchell, P.; Granger, L.; Sandiford, N.A. Serial C-reactive Protein Monitoring in Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Powerful Predictor or Potentially Pointless? Cureus 2020, 12, e6967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Burnett, R.S.; Kelly, M.A.; Hanssen, A.D.; Barrack, R.L. Technique and timing of two-stage exchange for infection in TKA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007, 464, 164–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cordero-Ampuero, J.; Esteban, J.; Garcia-Cimbrelo, E.; Munuera, L.; Escobar, R. Low relapse with oral antibiotics and two-stage exchange for late arthroplasty infections in 40 patients after 2–9 years. Acta Orthop. 2007, 78, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Whittaker, J.P.; Warren, R.E.; Jones, R.S.; Gregson, P.A. Is prolonged systemic antibiotic treatment essential in two-stage revision hip replacement for chronic Gram-positive infection. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2009, 91, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pulcini, C.; Couadau, T.; Bernard, E.; Lorthat-Jacob, A.; Bauer, T.; Cua, E.; Mondain, V.; Chichmanian, R.M.; Dellamonica, P.; Roger, P.M. Adverse effects of parenteral antimicrobial therapy for chronic bone infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2008, 27, 1227–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Duggal, A.; Barsoum, W.; Schmitt, S.K. Patients with prosthetic joint infection on IV antibiotics are at high risk for readmission. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009, 467, 1727–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Li, H.K.; Rombach, I.; Zambellas, R.; Walker, A.S.; McNally, M.A.; Atkins, B.L.; Lipsky, B.A.; Hughes, H.C.; Bose, D.; Kumin, M.; et al. Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hoffman-Terry, M.L.F.H.; Fox, T.R.; Swift, B.G.; Wolf, J.E. Adverse effects of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Am. J. Med. 1999, 106, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Spellberg, B.; Lipsky, B.A. Systemic antibiotic therapy for chronic osteomyelitis in adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bernard, L.; Legout, L.; Zürcher-Pfund, L.; Stern, R.; Rohner, P.; Peter, R.; Assal, M.; Lew, D.; Hoffmeyer, P.; Uçkay, I. Six weeks of antibiotic treatment is sufficient following surgery for septic arthroplasty. J. Infect. 2010, 61, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sandiford, N.A.; McHale, A.; Citak, M.; Kendoff, D. What is the optimal duration of intravenous antibiotics following single-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection? A systematic review. Hip Int. J. Clin. Exp. Res. Hip Pathol. Ther. 2021, 31, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bejon, P.; Berendt, A.; Atkins, B.L.; Green, N.; Parry, H.; Masters, S.; McLardy-Smith, P.; Gundle, R.; Byren, I. Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: Predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Diagnostics 12 01030 g001 550
Figure 1. Patient enrollment algorithm. Three out of six patients who had spacer exchange did not have infection recurrence, but still considered treatment failure according to Delphi criteria.
Figure 1. Patient enrollment algorithm. Three out of six patients who had spacer exchange did not have infection recurrence, but still considered treatment failure according to Delphi criteria.
Diagnostics 12 01030 g001
Diagnostics 12 01030 g002 550
Figure 2. Qualitative CRP trends. The CRP trends during the interim period are categorized into 5 types according to the CRP levels at pre-reimplantation, pre-resection, and whether CRP is normalized within 3 weeks after resection.
Figure 2. Qualitative CRP trends. The CRP trends during the interim period are categorized into 5 types according to the CRP levels at pre-reimplantation, pre-resection, and whether CRP is normalized within 3 weeks after resection.
Diagnostics 12 01030 g002
Diagnostics 12 01030 g003 550
Figure 3. Examples of five CRP patterns. CRP usually elevated right after resection.
Figure 3. Examples of five CRP patterns. CRP usually elevated right after resection.
Diagnostics 12 01030 g003
Table
Table 1. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. It was a scoring-based definition adopted by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society [27].
Table 1. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. It was a scoring-based definition adopted by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society [27].
Major Criteria (at Least One of the Following)Decision
Two Positive Cultures of the Same OrganismInfected
Sinus tract with evidence of communication to the joint or visualization of the prosthesis
Minor criteriaScoreDecision
Pre-OP diagnosisSerumElevated CRP or D-Dimer2≥6 Infected
Elevated ESR1
Synovial Elevated synovial WBC or LE32–5 Possibly infected
Positive alpha-defensin3
Elevated synovial PMN (%)20–1 Not infected
Elevated synovial CRP1
Inconclusive Pre-OP score, or dry tapScoreDecision
Intra-OP diagnosisPre-OP score-
Positive histology3≥6 Infected
Positive purulence34–5 Inconclusive
Single positive culture2≤3 Not infected
CRP: C-reactive protein, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, WBC: white blood cell, LE: leukocyte esterase, PMN: polymorphonuclear leukocyte, OP: operative.
Table
Table 2. Association of treatment outcome and variables. Treatment outcome was defined by modified Delphi criteria.
Table 2. Association of treatment outcome and variables. Treatment outcome was defined by modified Delphi criteria.
VariableSuccess (n = 77)Failure (n = 24)p Value
Patient characteristicsAge (years)70.867.20.164
Male27 (35%)16 (67%)0.006 *
Body weight66.675.70.006 *
BMI2830.10.166
CCI
4<26 (34%)11 (46%)0.284
≧451 (66%)13 (54%)
Presence of sinus tract19 (25%)5 (21%)0.699
Interim period (weeks)13.916.60.339
MicrobiologyCulture-negative25 (33%)9 (38%)0.883
MSSA28 (36%)8 (33%)
MRSA7 (9%)3 (13%)
Other G (+)6 (8%)0
G (-)5 (6%)2 (8%)
Fungus3 (4%)1 (4%)
Polymicrobial 3 (4%)1 (4%)
CRP patternType 13380.186
Type 2339
Type 343
Type 452
Type 522
CRP characteristicsPre-resection CRP68.5 (1.2–353.4)68 (5.7–272.8)0.977
CRP when DC IV Abx13.1 (0.8–46.65)27.1 (1–122)<0.001 *
∆ Preresection-DC IV Abx−13%73%0.190
CRP when DC all Abx8 (0.5–45.6)9.2 (1–35.4)0.564
∆ Preresection-DC all Abx−62%−77%0.313
Pre-reimplantation CRP6.1 (0.45–28.9)8 (0.9–37.8)0.249
∆ Preresection-pre-reimplantation−66%−71%0.745
AntibioticsIV Abx duration
Mean(days)15190.212
≦14 days46 (60%)11 (46%)0.23
>14 days31 (40%)13 (54%)
Total Abx duration
Mean (weeks)5.26.40.195
≦6 weeks50 (65%)9 (38%)0.017 *
>6 weeks27 (35%)15 (62%)
Abx after reimplantation 18 (23%)7 (29%)0.566
Abx drug holiday70 (91%)18 (75%)0.042 *
Abx: antibiotic, BMI: body mass index, CCI: Charlson, comorbidity index, DC: discontinue, IV: intravenous, MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. * p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Antibiotics duration. CRP type 4 and type 5 were associated with longer total antibiotic use.
Table 3. Antibiotics duration. CRP type 4 and type 5 were associated with longer total antibiotic use.
Mean (Weeks)95% CIp Value
CRP pattern <0.001 *
14.33.4–5.3
25.54.6–6.4
34.81.5–8.0
49.92.3–17.6
510.91.2–20.6
Microbiology 0.089
Culture-negative4.13.2–5.1
MSSA5.63.2–7.9
MRSA6.14.4–7.7
other G (+)4.63.6–5.5
G (-)7.33.8–10.8
Fungus6.00.2–11.8
Polymicrobial9.6−0.4–19.7
CI: confidence interval, MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. * p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, S.-H.; Chu, C.-T.; Chang, C.-H.; Hu, C.-C.; Chen, S.-Y.; Lu, T.-W.; Lin, Y.-C. Do Serum C-Reactive Protein Trends Predict Treatment Outcome in Patients with Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Undergoing Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty? Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051030

AMA Style

Lee S-H, Chu C-T, Chang C-H, Hu C-C, Chen S-Y, Lu T-W, Lin Y-C. Do Serum C-Reactive Protein Trends Predict Treatment Outcome in Patients with Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Undergoing Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty? Diagnostics. 2022; 12(5):1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Sheng-Hsun, Chun-Ting Chu, Chih-Hsiang Chang, Chih-Chien Hu, Szu-Yuan Chen, Tung-Wu Lu, and Yu-Chih Lin. 2022. "Do Serum C-Reactive Protein Trends Predict Treatment Outcome in Patients with Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Undergoing Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty?" Diagnostics 12, no. 5: 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop