Next Article in Journal
An Experimental and Virtual Approach to Hip Revision Prostheses
Next Article in Special Issue
Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Disorder: Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Previous Article in Journal
Multimodal Diagnostic Methods of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/diagnostics12081951
Review Report
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Prenatal Course and Sonographic Features of Congenital Mesoblastic Nephroma

Diagnostics 2022, 12(8), 1951; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081951
by Theera Tongsong 1,*, Watchareepohn Palangmonthip 2, Wisit Chankhunaphas 1 and Suchaya Luewan 1
Reviewer 1:
Mine Kanat-Pektas
Reviewer 2:
Shigeki Matsubara
Diagnostics 2022, 12(8), 1951; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081951
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 1 August 2022 / Accepted: 11 August 2022 / Published: 12 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging of Fetal and Maternal Diseases in Pregnancy 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors present a review of literature about the perinatal management of congenital mesoblastic nephroma on the basis of an index case. The study is well conducted and the manuscript is well written. However, there remains only one issue to be clarified. The authors should specify the indication for the cesarean delivery of their index case (previous cesarean, malposition or else). Whenever this specification has been made, I think that the manuscript can be accepted for publication in Diagnostics.

Author Response

Response: The indication for cesarean delivery is now specified, as highlighted (in blue) in “Case” section on page 3.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

To authors,

1.     Case: Please shortly describe the reason why you did not perform MRI.

2.     Case: Please shortly describe why you did not try (attempt) vaginal delivery. If possible, please describe CTG (cardiotocography) findings.

3.     Line 290: You touched that in some occasions MRI might be of use whereas in abstract you state that MRI is not needed. I have vague feeling/understanding for/of your statement; you might wish to say, “in ordinary (in almost all) cases, ultrasound can identify the condition but if some other tumors are suspicious we had better employ MRI”, right? Please very shortly describe this meaning in Abstract. 

Author Response

  1. Case: Please shortly describe the reason why you did not perform MRI.

Response: The reason is added as highlighted in “Case” section page 3.

  1. Case: Please shortly describe why you did not try (attempt) vaginal delivery. If possible, please describe CTG (cardiotocography) findings.

Response: As highlighted in blue in “Case” section page 3, indication for cesarean section is unstable lie. CTG is now described (category 1), as highlihged.

  1. Line 290: You touched that in some occasions MRI might be of use whereas in abstract you state that MRI is not needed. I have vague feeling/understanding for/of your statement; you might wish to say, “in ordinary (in almost all) cases, ultrasound can identify the condition but if some other tumors are suspicious we had better employ MRI”, right? Please very shortly describe this meaning in Abstract.

Response: The statement is now clarified, as highlihged in “Abstract”. Thank you very much for the comment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop