Next Article in Journal
An Innovative Virtual Reality System for Measuring Refractive Error
Previous Article in Journal
WHO/ICC Classification for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms/Syndromes Performs Better for Subtype Cytomorphological Diagnosis?
Previous Article in Special Issue
ML Models Built Using Clinical Parameters and Radiomic Features Extracted from 18F-Choline PET/CT for the Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence after Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Patients with Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Analyzing the Relationship between Dose and Geometric Agreement Metrics for Auto-Contouring in Head and Neck Normal Tissues

by
Barbara Marquez
1,2,*,
Zachary T. Wooten
3,
Ramon M. Salazar
1,2,
Christine B. Peterson
2,4,
David T. Fuentes
2,5,
T. J. Whitaker
1,
Anuja Jhingran
6,
Julianne Pollard-Larkin
1,2,
Surendra Prajapati
1,2,
Beth Beadle
7,
Carlos E. Cardenas
8,
Tucker J. Netherton
1 and
Laurence E. Court
1,2
1
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
4
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
5
Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
6
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
7
Department of Radiation Oncology–Radiation Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
8
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(15), 1632; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151632 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 June 2024 / Revised: 18 July 2024 / Accepted: 19 July 2024 / Published: 29 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medical Imaging: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the relationship between geometric and dosimetric agreement metrics in head and neck (H&N) cancer radiotherapy plans. A total 287 plans were retrospectively analyzed, comparing auto-contoured and clinically used contours using a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface DSC (sDSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD). Organs-at-risk (OARs) with ≥200 cGy dose differences from the clinical contour in terms of Dmax (D0.01cc) and Dmean were further examined against proximity to the planning target volume (PTV). A secondary set of 91 plans from multiple institutions validated these findings. For 4995 contour pairs across 19 OARs, 90% had a DSC, sDSC, and HD of at least 0.75, 0.86, and less than 7.65 mm, respectively. Dosimetrically, the absolute difference between the two contour sets was <200 cGy for 95% of OARs in terms of Dmax and 96% in terms of Dmean. In total, 97% of OARs exhibiting significant dose differences between the clinically edited contour and auto-contour were within 2.5 cm PTV regardless of geometric agreement. There was an approximately linear trend between geometric agreement and identifying at least 200 cGy dose differences, with higher geometric agreement corresponding to a lower fraction of cases being identified. Analysis of the secondary dataset validated these findings. Geometric indices are approximate indicators of contour quality and identify contours exhibiting significant dosimetric discordance. For a small subset of OARs within 2.5cm of the PTV, geometric agreement metrics can be misleading in terms of contour quality.
Keywords: auto-contouring; contouring; radiotherapy; organs-at-risk; head and neck auto-contouring; contouring; radiotherapy; organs-at-risk; head and neck

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marquez, B.; Wooten, Z.T.; Salazar, R.M.; Peterson, C.B.; Fuentes, D.T.; Whitaker, T.J.; Jhingran, A.; Pollard-Larkin, J.; Prajapati, S.; Beadle, B.; et al. Analyzing the Relationship between Dose and Geometric Agreement Metrics for Auto-Contouring in Head and Neck Normal Tissues. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151632

AMA Style

Marquez B, Wooten ZT, Salazar RM, Peterson CB, Fuentes DT, Whitaker TJ, Jhingran A, Pollard-Larkin J, Prajapati S, Beadle B, et al. Analyzing the Relationship between Dose and Geometric Agreement Metrics for Auto-Contouring in Head and Neck Normal Tissues. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(15):1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151632

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marquez, Barbara, Zachary T. Wooten, Ramon M. Salazar, Christine B. Peterson, David T. Fuentes, T. J. Whitaker, Anuja Jhingran, Julianne Pollard-Larkin, Surendra Prajapati, Beth Beadle, and et al. 2024. "Analyzing the Relationship between Dose and Geometric Agreement Metrics for Auto-Contouring in Head and Neck Normal Tissues" Diagnostics 14, no. 15: 1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151632

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop