A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Participants
2.2. Procedures
2.2.1. Nugent Score and Microbiological Culture
2.2.2. Real-Time PCR Test (Flora SelectTM)
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hillier, S.L.; Nugent, R.P.; Eschenbach, D.A.; Krohn, M.A.; Gibbs, R.S.; Martin, D.H.; Cotch, M.F.; Edelman, R.; Pastorek, J.G., 2nd; Rao, A.V.; et al. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 1737–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amsel, R.; Totten, P.A.; Spiegel, C.A.; Chen, K.C.S.; Eschenbach, D.; Holmes, K.K. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 1983, 74, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nugent, R.P.; Krohn, M.A.; Hillier, S.L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991, 29, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muzny, C.A.; Cerca, N.; Elnaggar, J.H.; Taylor, C.M.; Sobel, J.D.; van der Pol, B. State of the art for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2023, 61, e0083722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Witkin, S.S. The vaginal microbiome, vaginal anti-microbial defence mechanisms and the clinical challenge of reducing infection-related preterm birth. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 122, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Serrano, M.G.; Parikh, H.I.; Brooks, J.P.; Edwards, D.J.; Tom, J.; Edupuganti, L.; Huang, B.; Girerd, P.H.; Bokhari, Y.; Bradley, S.P.; et al. Racioethnic diversity in the dynamics of the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goldenberg, R.L.; Culhane, J.F.; Iams, J.D.; Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008, 371, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, T.; Shang, A.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Sun, H.; Wang, W. Log (Lactobacillus crispatus/Gardnerella vaginalis): A new indicator of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 2981–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, C.; Gin, C.; Fettweis, J.; Foxman, B.; Gelaye, B.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Subramaniam, A.; Fraser, W.; Tabatabaei, N.; Callahan, B. Meta-analysis reveals the vaginal microbiome is a better predictor of earlier than later preterm birth. BMC Biol. 2023, 21, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bretelle, F.; Loubière, S.; Desbriere, R.; Loundou, A.; Blanc, J.; Heckenroth, H.; Schmitz, T.; Benachi, A.; Haddad, B.; Mauviel, F.; et al. Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynécologie (GROG) Investigators. Effectiveness and costs of molecular screening and treatment for bacterial vaginosis to prevent preterm birth: The AuTop Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2023, 177, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brookheart, R.T.; Lewis, W.G.; Peipert, J.F.; Lewis, A.L.; Allsworth, J.E. Association between obesity and bacterial vaginosis as assessed by Nugent score. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 220, 476.e1–476.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin No. 130: Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 120, 964–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sangkomkamhang, U.S.; Lumbiganon, P.; Prasertcharoensuk, W.; Laopaiboon, M. Antenatal lower genital tract infection screening and treatment programs for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 2015, CD006178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kiss, H.; Petricevic, L.; Husslein, P. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an infection screening programme to reduce the rate of preterm delivery. BMJ 2004, 329, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sweeney, E.L.; Dando, S.J.; Kallapur, S.G.; Knox, C.L. The human Ureaplasma species as causative agents of chorioamnionitis. Clinl. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 349–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kataoka, S.; Yamada, T.; Chou, K.; Nishida, R.; Morikawa, M.; Minami, M.; Yamada, H.; Sakuragi, N.; Minakami, H. Association between preterm birth and vaginal colonization by mycoplasmas in early pregnancy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, Y.; Tanimura, K.; Sasagawa, Y.; Yamada, H. Vaginal microbiota associated with preterm delivery. J. Infect. Chemother. 2020, 26, 1134–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, Y.; Yamada, H.; Sasagawa, Y.; Tanimura, K.; Deguchi, M. Uterine endometrium microbiota and pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2022, 152, 103653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Characteristics of Participants n = 556 | Median | Range |
---|---|---|
Age, years | 31 | 16–45 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 21.3 | 15.4–37.8 |
Gravidity | 2 | 1–8 |
Parity | 1 | 0–6 |
Number of previous miscarriages | 0 | 0–4 |
Number of previous preterm births | 0 | 0–1 |
Gestational week (w) and day (d) of examinations | 10w4d | 8w0d–12w6d |
Number | % | |
Number of women with a history of miscarriage | 119 | 21.4 |
Number of women with a history of preterm birth | 19 | 3.4 |
Nugent score | Number | % |
0–3 | 468 | 84.2 |
4–6 | 41 | 7.4 |
≥7 | 47 | 8.5 |
Flora select™ | Number | % |
Relative dominance rate of Lactobacillus species | ||
High (≥80%) | 350 | 63.0 |
Medium (50%≤, <80%) | 49 | 8.8 |
Low (0.1≤, <50%) | 95 | 17.1 |
No detection (<0.1%) | 62 | 11.2 |
Presence of BV-associated bacteria species | ||
Gardnerella | 133 | 23.9 |
Prevotella | 98 | 17.6 |
Atopobium | 95 | 17.1 |
Streptococcus | 39 | 7.0 |
Miscarriage/preterm birth-associated bacteria species | ||
Ureaplasma | 128 | 23.0 |
Mycoplasma | 27 | 4.9 |
Nugent Score | Number | Lactobacillus Species <50% (%) | Presence of BV-Associated Bacteria Species (%) | Presence of ≥Two BV-Associated Bacteria Species (%) | BV-Associated Bacteria Species | Miscarriage/Preterm Birth-Associated Bacteria Species | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gardnerella (%) | Prevotella (%) | Atopobium (%) | Streptococcus (%) | Ureaplasma (%) | Mycoplasma (%) | |||||
0–3 | 468 | 16.9 | 16.7 | 10.7 | 13.7 | 7.9 | 6.6 | 4.7 | 21.2 | 2.6 |
4–6 | 41 | 78.0 | 70.7 | 61.0 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 17.1 | 24.4 | 9.8 |
≥7 | 47 | 97.9 | 100.0 | 95.7 | 100.0 | 83.0 | 89.4 | 21.3 | 40.4 | 23.4 |
Fisher’s exact test | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p = 0.014 | p < 0.01 |
Relative Dominance Rate of Lactobacillus Species | Number | Nugent Scores ≥7/Nugent Scores ≥4 (%) | Presence of BV-Associated Bacteria Species (%) | Presence of ≥Two BV-Associated Bacteria Species (%) | BV-Associated Bacteria Species | Miscarriage/Preterm Birth-Associated Bacteria Species | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gardnerella (%) | Prevotella (%) | Atopobium (%) | Streptococcus (%) | Ureaplasma (%) | Mycoplasma (%) | |||||
High (≥80%) | 350 | 0.0/2.0 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 18.3 | 1.4 |
Medium (50%≤, <80%) | 49 | 2.0/6.1 | 44.9 | 22.5 | 36.7 | 20.4 | 18.4 | 8.2 | 28.6 | 10.2 |
Low (0.1≤, <50%) | 95 | 30.5/45.3 | 84.2 | 72.6 | 76.8 | 57.9 | 63.2 | 17.9 | 33.7 | 13.7 |
No detection (<0.1%) | 62 | 27.4/56.5 | 66.1 | 53.2 | 54.8 | 43.6 | 33.9 | 24.2 | 29.0 | 6.5 |
Fisher’s exact test | p < 0.01/p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 |
Gardnerella Species | Bacterial Culture | Total | Prevotella Species | Bacterial Culture | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||||
Flora select™ | Flora select™ | ||||||
Positive | 46 | 87 | 133 | Positive | 4 | 94 | 98 |
Negative | 5 | 418 | 423 | Negative | 0 | 458 | 458 |
Total | 51 | 505 | 556 | Total | 4 | 552 | 556 |
Atopobium Species | Bacterial Culture | Total | Streptococcus Species | Bacterial Culture | Total | ||
Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||||
Flora select™ | Flora select™ | ||||||
Positive | 0 | 95 | 95 | Positive | 16 | 23 | 39 |
Negative | 0 | 461 | 461 | Negative | 55 | 462 | 517 |
Total | 0 | 556 | 556 | Total | 71 | 485 | 556 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yamada, H.; Shimada, S.; Ota, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Fukushi, Y.; Wada, S.; Kataoka, S. A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102110
Yamada H, Shimada S, Ota H, Kobayashi Y, Fukushi Y, Wada S, Kataoka S. A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(10):2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102110
Chicago/Turabian StyleYamada, Hideto, Shigeki Shimada, Hajime Ota, Yuta Kobayashi, Yoshiyuki Fukushi, Shinichiro Wada, and Soromon Kataoka. 2024. "A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy" Microorganisms 12, no. 10: 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102110
APA StyleYamada, H., Shimada, S., Ota, H., Kobayashi, Y., Fukushi, Y., Wada, S., & Kataoka, S. (2024). A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy. Microorganisms, 12(10), 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102110