Next Article in Journal
Stress-Induced Sulfide Production by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus megaterium
Previous Article in Journal
Biosensing Technologies for Detecting Legionella in Environmental Samples: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Hypersaline Soils of the Odiel Saltmarshes Natural Area as a Source for Uncovering a New Taxon: Pseudidiomarina terrestris sp. nov
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Halotolerant Endophytic Bacteria Priestia flexa 7BS3110 with Hg2+ Tolerance Isolated from Avicennia germinans in a Caribbean Mangrove from Colombia

by
Zamira E. Soto-Varela
1,2,*,†,
Christian J. Orozco-Sánchez
1,3,†,
Hernando José Bolívar-Anillo
1,
José M. Martínez
2,
Nuria Rodríguez
2,4,
Natalia Consuegra-Padilla
1,2,
Alfredo Robledo-Meza
1 and
Ricardo Amils
2,4
1
Facultad de Ciencias Básicas y Biomédicas, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Climático—ADAPTIA, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
2
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
3
Institute of Applied Microbiology, Justus-Liebig-University, 35392 Giessen, Germany
4
Centro de Astrobiología (INTA-CSIC), Carretera, Ajalvir km 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(9), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12091857
Submission received: 17 April 2024 / Revised: 29 May 2024 / Accepted: 31 May 2024 / Published: 7 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Halophilic Microorganisms, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
The mangrove ecosystems of the Department of Atlántico (Colombian Caribbean) are seriously threatened by problems of hypersalinization and contamination, especially by heavy metals from the Magdalena River. The mangrove plants have developed various mechanisms to adapt to these stressful conditions, as well as the associated microbial populations that favor their growth. In the present work, the tolerance and detoxification capacity to heavy metals, especially to mercury, of a halotolerant endophytic bacterium isolated from the species Avicennia germinans located in the Balboa Swamp in the Department of Atlántico was characterized. Diverse microorganisms were isolated from superficially sterilized A. germinans leaves. Tolerance to NaCl was evaluated for each of the obtained isolates, and the most resistant was selected to assess its tolerance to Pb2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, Cr3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+, many of which have been detected in high concentrations in the area of study. According to the ANI and AAI percentages, the most halotolerant strain was identified as Priestia flexa, named P. flexa 7BS3110, which was able to tolerate up to 12.5% (w/v) NaCl and presented a minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.25 mM for Hg, 10 mM for Pb, and 15 mM for Cr3+. The annotation of the P. flexa 7BS3110 genome revealed the presence of protein sequences associated with exopolysaccharide (EPS) production, thiol biosynthesis, specific proteins for chrome efflux, non-specific proteins for lead efflux, and processes associated with sulfur and iron homeostasis. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed morphological cellular changes and the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed an electrodense extracellular layer when exposed to 0.25 mM Hg2+. Due to the high tolerance of P. flexa 7BS3110 to Hg2+ and NaCl, its ability to grow when exposed to both stressors was tested, and it was able to thrive in the presence of 5% (w/v) NaCl and 0.25 mM of Hg2+. In addition, it was able to remove 98% of Hg2+ from the medium when exposed to a concentration of 14 mg/L of this metalloid. P. flexa 7BS3110 has the potential to bioremediate Hg2+ halophilic contaminated ecosystems.

1. Introduction

Mangroves are ecosystems located in a critical transition zone between terrestrial and marine environments. They are recognized as one of the most productive ecosystems on Earth, playing a fundamental role in climate change adaptation and mitigation [1]. These forests are composed of plant species (halophilic trees and shrubs) with morphological, physiological, and reproductive adaptations that allow them to survive at the interface between terrestrial, estuarine, and marine ecosystems in tropical and subtropical regions throughout the world [2,3]. However, these ecosystems are under pressure worldwide mainly due to anthropogenic activities [4]. Colombia has an area of mangrove forests of approximately 300,000 ha, of which more than one fourth are found on the Caribbean coast, where five species, Avicennia germinans, Rhizophora mangle, Laguncularia racemosa, Conocarpus erectus, and Pelliciera rhizophorae, have been reported [5]. It is estimated that, in the last 30 years, approximately 40,000 ha of mangrove forest in Colombia has been altered by different activities, including road construction; urban growth; expansion of agriculture, fish, and livestock frontiers; and indiscriminate logging, among others [3,6]. In the case of the Colombian Caribbean region, one of the main stress factors is the alteration of their hydrology, due to the decrease in freshwater supply caused by the stream channeling, which was triggered by a progressive process of hyper salinization. This process has limited the growth of mangrove seedlings and trees for the last 10–20 years [7]. In addition, mangroves are exposed to various pollutants, including sewage and industrial effluents, along with marine and atmospheric activities [8]. In fact, many of these ecosystems are close to the mouths of rivers and receive a notable influence from contaminated water and sediments [9]. A notable example is the Magdalena River, a sink for polluted water from agricultural runoff, extensive livestock farming, mining, domestic, and industrial discharges from all over Colombia; this affects downstream ecosystems as is the case of the mangroves near its mouth. The heavy metals present are of especial relevance in this ecosystem due to their toxicity [8]. The coastal marine ecosystems of the Atlantic department are exposed to the presence of heavy metals such as Zn2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Cr6+, Cd2+, and Hg2+, which have been detected in sediments. This suggests a mixed origin, the consequence of anthropogenic activities (agriculture and industrial sources, together with discharge of domestic wastewater, leachates, and inputs from the Magdalena River [10]. In addition, most of these heavy metals have been detected in the tissues of fish that develop in these mangrove forests [11,12].
Heavy metals can be chemically defined as a group of elements with high atomic weight and density, including metals and metalloids that at low concentrations can be toxic to the environment and humans [13,14,15]. Heavy metal contamination is characterized by being covert, persistent, and irreversible, and can accumulate through the food chain, causing damage to the health of living organisms [14,16]. Metals such as Cd2+, Cr3+, Pb2+, and Hg2+, due to their high degree of toxicity, are a high priority to public health services [17].
In recent decades, plant-associated microorganisms have been shown to play an important role in the ability of plants to adapt to environmental disturbances [18]. In this regard, there is great interest in endophytic microorganisms for their ability to improve plant response to various biotic and abiotic stress factors [19,20]. Endophytes have successfully evolved to adapt to a heavy-metal-contaminated environment by developing responses such as biomagnification, decreased enzyme activity, promoting metal sequestering, and increased gene expression of stress responses [18,21,22]. The mechanisms used by heavy-metal-tolerant bacteria have been widely studied [23,24,25,26,27]. The bacterial strategies of tolerance and bio-transformation of heavy metals are determined genetically, and with the introduction of massive sequencing, it is possible to identify them and to verify if its presence translates phenotypically into tolerance at the laboratory level [28].
Many bacteria show varying degrees of multi-resistance to heavy metals when exposed to highly polluted environments, among which it is worth highlighting the genera Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Brevibacterium, and Bacillus, among others [29]. Different species of the genus Bacillus such as B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, B. cereus, B. clausii, and B. fexus have shown high tolerance to different heavy metals [30,31,32]. The last one, B. flexus, recently reclassified as Priestia flexa [33], is a Gram-positive bacteria that is found in mangrove ecosystems [34] and shows tolerance to toxic heavy metals, among which arsenic is the most studied [35,36,37,38]. The aim of this study was to characterize the tolerance to different heavy metals, especially Hg2+, and detoxification capacity, of a halotolerant endophytic strain of P. flexa isolated from the mangrove A. germinans in the Colombian Caribbean.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sampling

The Balboa swamp is located in the western part of the municipality of Puerto Colombia, Department Atlántico (10°58′48.12″ N, 74°58′34.50″ O) and has an area of approximately 160 hectares and a perimeter of 24,800 m, where the presence of salt marshes can be observed (Figure 1A,B) [39,40]. In the Balboa swamp, there are extensive zones in which the mangroves have disappeared, which apparently is related to the lack of fresh water [41]. The coastal strip where the Balboa swamp is located is a very dynamic area influenced by the Magdalena River, which has changed over the years (Figure 1C,D). Some physical and chemical characteristics of the water were measured with a YSI EXO-1 multiparameter probe in 6 points of the study area, and these included pH (6.57–7.16), salinity (7.04–66.97% PSU), conductivity (12.36–94.02 mS/cm), and dissolved oxygen (24.9–37.2% DO).

2.2. Isolation of Endophytic Bacteria from Avicennia germinans

Healthy leaves from a Avicennia germinans tree were sampled from Balboa swamp, (Figure 1B). Freshly acquired samples were brought to the laboratory in sterile packaging and immediately processed. Leaves were washed thoroughly with sterile distilled water, and then immersed in 80% ethanol for 1 min, followed with a wash with 4% NaOCl for 5 min. Finally, leaves were washed 8 successive times using sterile distilled water [42]. Several aliquots of the final rinse water were grown on oxytetracycline glucose agar base medium (OGYE) plates to confirm the correct surface sterilization. Healthy leaves then were macerated with 3 mL of sterile 0.9% NaCl in a sterile mortar. The macerate dilution and tissue segments were placed on OGYE agar base medium and incubated at 25 °C for 72 h [42]. Bacterial isolates were selected based on colony appearance and streaked on OGYE agar base plates until purity level was achieved. Purified isolates were grown on Luria Bertani (LB)-agar plates (Millipore®, Burlington, VT, USA) at 25 °C and cells were stored in 30% (v/v) glycerol at −80 °C [43]. Isolates were named X (1-7) BS3110 after the Balboa swamp.

2.3. Tolerance to NaCl

Isolates were grown in tryptone soy broth (TSB) to reach the exponential phase. Next, 100 µL of each of these cultures was inoculated in TSB at different salinities (2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%, and 15% NaCl). Cultures were incubated at 200 rpm at room temperature and growth was observed every day spectroscopically until completing 5 days of incubation. The bacteria with the greatest tolerance was selected for subsequent studies.

2.4. Screening of Heavy Metal Tolerance in Strain 7BS3110

Heavy metal tolerance assays were performed from a microbial inoculum of P. flexa incubated for 24 h in TSB. A total of 20 µL was taken and inoculated in Petri dishes with tryptic soy agar (TSA) at different concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 mM) of heavy metals salts: CrCl3 · 6H20, CuSO4 · 5H20, ZnCl2, CoSO4 · 7H2O, HgCl2, PbNO3, NiCl2 · 7H2O, and CdSO4 in triplicate. Plates were incubated at room temperature for up to 15 days. Growth was observed at 1, 2, 3, 7, and 15 days of incubation. The last concentrations with appreciation of growth were cultivated in TSA agar without heavy metal to determine the viability of the strain. The results were expressed as minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC), which correspond to the lowest level of heavy metal that inhibits growth and that causes microbial death, respectively.

2.5. Genomic Analyses of Strain 7BS3110

Genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-based method (CTAB) [44] and its concentration was determined with a Qubit v.2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Library preparation and DNA sequencing was performed by MicrobesNG (University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK). Libraries were performed using the Nextera XT kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Sequencing was performed with Illumina MiSeq. Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v.0.36. [45] and quality analyses were performed with FastQC software v.0.11.8 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/, accessed on 11 January 2023). Assembly was performed with SPAdes v.3.12.0 [46]. The contigs were extended and merged into Scaffolds using SSPACE software v2.1.1 [47] and the generated gaps were closed with the GapFiller v.1-10 software [48]. The quality analyses of genome assembly were performed with Quality Assessment Tool for Genome Assemblies—Quast software v.5.2 [49] and the purity of the genome was checked using Microbial Genome Atlas v.1.3.9.0 web service (http://microbial-genomes.org, accessed on 13 February 2023) [50]. Taxonomic classification was performed using the average nucleotide identity (ANI) using both best hits (one-way ANI) and reciprocal best hits (two-way ANI) between two genomic datasets and the average amino acid identity (AAI) using both best hits (one-way AAI) and reciprocal best hits (two-way AAI) between two genomic datasets of proteins (https://enve-omics.gatech.edu/, accessed on 23 August 2023) [51,52]. Additionality, a phylogenetic tree was constructed from the 16S ribosomal DNA sequence of P. flexa 7BS3110 and other related reference bacteria obtained at the National Center for Biotechnology information (NCBI), which were aligned with CLUSTAL W and processed with the MEGA V 11.0.13 software using neighbor-joining method and subjected to 1.000 bootstrap replications.
The whole genome was annotated with Prokka v1.12 [53] and RAST [54]. An in-depth search for genes related to heavy metal tolerance was conducted. Therefore, a database was compiled with the sequences of the proteins related to heavy metal resistance retrieved from the UniProt database. Using this database, a search of the amino acid sequences annotated in the sequenced genome was performed using blastp. The presence of a protein was considered with a percent identity higher than 35%, a query cover higher than 50%, and an E-value smaller than 10−5. For proteins that met these criteria, but whose annotated name in the genome was different from that of the searched protein or corresponded to a hypothetical protein, their sequences were analyzed using the InterPro Website program [55] to establish family membership, similar molecular functions, common domains, and common cellular locations.

2.6. Evaluation of the Effect of Mercury on the Cell Structure of P. flexa 7BS3110

Considering the high tolerance of P. flexa 7BS3110 to mercury, an Erlenmeyer assay was performed with 10 mL of TSB at a concentration of 0.25 mM HgCl2 for 7 days. For this, an inoculum obtained from a P. flexa 7BS3110 colony on TSA agar was used, which was initially cultured in 10 mL of mercury-free TSB for 24 h and later 100 µL of this culture was transferred to 10 mL of TSB with 0.15 mM HgCl2. All the cultures were carried out at room temperature at 200 rpm and OD was measured each day at 600 nM.

2.7. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM-EDX)

A total of 200 µL from culture was taken at 2 and 4 days of incubation and fixed with 25% glutaraldehyde for one hour, then filtered on a 0.22 µm nucleopore filter with 1% saline phosphate buffer (PBS). Once filtered, 100% ethanol was added and filtered again and the filter was dried for SEM analyses.
Two types of scanning electron microscopes were used, JEOL-5600 VL, coupled to an Oxford INCA X sight EDAX energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis and a scanning electron microscopy field-emission gun (SEMFEG) Philips XL30-FEG OL-5600. Electrically conductive carbon tabs and double sticks were pressed to conductive graphite stubs and gold-coated using a Quorum, Q150T-S. Various stubs with sample pieces were placed inside the SEM chamber in high vacuum conditions and the microstructure was analyzed. Analytical conditions were 0.2 mA current 15 kV and 10 kV accelerating voltage, for the uncoated samples and gold-coated samples, respectively.

2.8. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)

Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) (pH 7.2) for 2 h at room temperature and washed three times with phosphate buffer and post-fixed with 1% of OsO4 in water during 60 min at room temperature in the dark. Later, they were washed three times by distillate water, and incubated with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate for 1 h at room temperature, washed again, and dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol between 30–90% (2 × 20 min) and 100% (2 × 30 min) at room temperature. Dehydration was finished with a mixture of ethanol/propylene oxide (1:1) for 10 min and pure propylene oxide for 3 × 10 min. Infiltration of the resin was accomplished with propylene oxide/Epon (1:1) for 45 min and pure LR white resin (London Resin Company Ltd., London, UK), overnight at room temperature. Polymerization of infiltrated samples was performed at 60 °C for 2 days. Ultrathin sections of the samples were cut using an Ultracutof Leica, and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate by standard procedures [56]. The samples were imaged with a JEOL JEM1400 Flash (JAPAN) and the pictures were taken to 100Kv using a One View Gatan (Pleasanton, CA, USA) 4 K × 4 K, CMSO.

2.9. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

To evaluate the reduction in the concentration of mercury in P. flexa in liquid culture, a 2 mL culture sample was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm/5 min, the supernatant was filtered with a 0.25 µm pore diameter filter to remove residual biomass, and the supernatant was used to determinate and quantify the elemental mercury content by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Samples were analyzed using an ELA Samples with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS), model NexION 2000 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.10. Mercury Tolerance at Different Concentrations of NaCl

A preliminary test was carried out combining different concentrations of HgCl2 (0.1; 0.15; 0.2; and 0.25 mM) and NaCl (2.5%; 5%; 7.5%; and 10% w/v) in falcon tubes with 5 mL of TSB broth using an inoculum previously adapted to 0.15 mM of HgCl2. Tubes were incubated at room temperature at 200 rpm/9 days and from each one, 20 µL was seeded in TSA without HgCl2 to determine the viability of the strain. Subsequently, an Erlenmeyer test was carried out with 10 mL of TSB broth at 0.25 mM HgCl2 under the different concentrations of NaCl tested in the screening, for which an inoculum previously adapted to 0.15 mM HgCl2 was used. Cultures were incubated at 200 rpm at room temperature for 4 days and a daily sample was taken from each Erlenmeyer flask to read the optical density (600 nm) in a microplate reader.

3. Results

3.1. Screening for NaCl Tolerance of Endophytic Bacterial Isolates

The isolated bacteria were labeled 1BS3110, 2BS3110, 3BS3110, 4BS3110, 5BS3110, 6BS3110, and 7BS3110, showing a NaCl tolerance range between 7.5% and 12.5% (Table 1). Isolate 7BS3110 showed the highest tolerance to NaCl and was selected for a heavy metal tolerance and genomic analysis.

3.2. Screening of Heavy Metal Tolerance of Isolate 7BS3110

The tolerance to different heavy metals obtained by P. flexa 7BS3110 is summarized in Table 2. It is possible to observe tolerance to high concentrations of Cr3+ and Pb2+ with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 15 mM and 10 mM, respectively, and high minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) to Pb2+ and Co2+ of 1000 mM. In the case of Hg2+, the MIC was 0.01 mM; however, the MBC was 0.75 mM. A culture assay was performed and turbidity was observed up to 0.25 mM. P. flexa 7BS3110 shows low sensitivities to Ni2+ and Cd2+ with a MIC and a MBC of 5 mM and 1 mM, respectively (Table 2).

3.3. General Characteristics of the Genome and Taxonomic Identification of the Strain with Greater Tolerance to NaCl

To identify the genes and gene products related to heavy metal tolerance the genome of isolate 7BS3110 was sequenced. The percentages of genome completeness and contamination were 99.1% and 7.5%, respectively. General genome characteristics and assembly quality data in comparison with the genomes of other species of the genus Priestia are shown in Table S1 of Supplementary Material. The gene annotation resulted in a total of 4161 coding DNA sequences, 89 tRNA genes, 1 complete rRNA operon, and 11 copies of 5S rRNA. The number of genes with assigned function after the annotation was 2473, corresponding to a percentage of 57.97%.
Based on the average nucleotide identity (ANI) and the average amino acid identity (AAI), the genome of 7BS3110 strain corresponds to the species Priestia flexa with a 99.3% and 95% of identity, respectively. In the Supplementary Material (Table S1 and Figure S1), the phylogenetic tree and the ANI and AAI values obtained for the different Priestia species analyzed are shown.

3.4. Identification of Heavy Metal Tolerance Proteins Sequences in P. flexa 7BS3110

According to the annotation using Prokka and Rast, P. flexa 7BS3110 bacterium presented a protein sequence for resistance to Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+. In addition, protein for the synthesis and transport of siderophores, spore formation, and resistance to stress conditions were also detected. In Table S2 of the Supplementary Material, the proteins found in the bibliographic review associated with the resistance of Hg2+, Pb2+, and Cr3+ are detailed; these are summarized in Table 3. In the case of Hg2+, proteins for the synthesis of EPS and bacillithiol were identified and in relation to the protein codified by mer operon, only the sequences of MerA and MerR were identified. The sequence of SmtA and SmtB proteins, related to Hg2+ bioaccumulation, are not evident; however, a protein sequence with similar family, domain, and function to ArsR/SmtB regulator was found. In the case of Pb2+, there are no specific protein binding sequences to this metal for its efflux, and only a similar function protein to pbrA was found. Other non-specific transporters and efflux regulators reported to Pb2+ efflux such as CadA and CadC were identified, and many protein sequences associated with siderophores transport were found. For Cr6+, a similar sequence of the proteins ChrA and ChrB, which are associated with its efflux, were identified; however ChrR, a protein related to its reduction, could not be found. However other oxidoreductases like NfsA, NfsB, AzoR, and NemA were identified. Likewise, some proteins associated with Cr6+ resistance, due to processes related to sulfur or iron homeostasis, like CysC, CysL, and CysP, were found (Table 3).

3.5. Effect of Hg2+ on Cell Morphology and Growth of P. flexa 7BS3110

The effect of Hg+2 on cell morphology, evidenced by SEM analysis, and on microbial growth, through the measurement of OD over time, is shown in Figure 2. In relation to the growth of this bacterium at different concentrations of NaCl and HgCl2, growth was only observed with 2.5% of NaCl at all HgCl2 concentrations tested. However, when viability was determined, colonies were obtained in all the combinations tested. Then, we proceeded to evaluate the growth at the maximum concentration of HgCl2 tested with different concentrations of NaCl. The results show that P. flexa 7BS3110 was only able to grow at 2.5 and 5% of NaCl with 0.25 mM of HgCl2 from the second day (Figure 2B), unlike the controls without mercury, where growth was observed at all concentrations evaluated from the first day of growth at these same concentrations; at 7.5% and 10%, the bacteria began to grow on the second and third day, respectively (Figure 2A).
At cell level, the effects of exposure to mercury in P. flexa 7BS3110 were observed by SEM (Figure 2C–E), from which it was possible to detect changes in the morphology of the cells after 7 days of exposure, observing abundant coccus-shaped cells, which were very different from the bacillary morphology of the untreated controls. This morphology was still observable after two days of incubation (Figure 2E).

3.6. Capacity to Reduce the Concentration of Hg2+ in Solution by P. flexa 7BS3110

Figure 3 shows the ability to sequester mercury in P. flexa 7B3110 by measuring Hg2+ in the culture medium and through SEM and TEM observations. The incubation of P. flexa 7BS3110 in the presence of 14 mg/L of Hg2+ resulted in a reduction of 96% of Hg2+ from the solution (p = 0.05 in U Mann–Whitney test) after four days (Figure 3A). A slight increase in the concentration of Hg2+ was observed after seven days of incubation (Figure 3A). Additionally, the TEM observations of P. flexa 7B3110 cells exposed to Hg2+ showed an electrodense layer around the cell (Figure 3D,F), which was absent in the unexposed bacteria (Figure 3C,E). The SEM images show the exudation of exopolysaccharides (EPS) that could lead to biofilm formation (Figure 3B).

4. Discussion

The Balboa swamp (Figure 1B,C) arose as the result of anthropogenic activity at the mouth of the Magdalena River [7,85,86]. In 1935, the breakwaters known as “Tajamares de Bocas de Ceniza” were built at the mouth of the Magdalena River, which favored severe erosion on the west side of the delta (Figure 1D). In the following decades, these sediments, together with their vegetation, merged with the coastline and formed different swamps, among them the Balboa swamp, which, at present, is undergoing a process of hypersalinization due to the decrease in freshwater supply [7,85,86,87]. Recently, different studies have detected the presence of Cd2+ (0.46 µg/mL), Cr6+ (<5 µg/mL), Ni2+ (2.68 µg/mL), Cu2+ (2.47 µg/mL), and Pb2+ (0.12 µg/mL), in both water and sediments [88,89], and in the case of Hg2+ (0.18 µg/g), in the sediments [10]. Therefore, the mangrove forests found on the coast of the department of Atlántico (e.g., Balboa swamp) have been in contact, throughout their evolutionary history, with all types of pollutants transported by the waters and sediments of the Magdalena River. Currently, these mangroves are under increasing anthropogenic pressure, mainly due to industrialization and urbanization [3,90]. In mangrove ecosystems, heavy metals are deposited in the sediments, where they bind to iron oxides and are transferred to the mangrove plant [91]. In this regard, mangrove plants are recognized as heavy metal bioaccumulators [92,93,94]. In mangrove plants, these metals have been detected in roots and in leaves [94,95]. Therefore, in response to heavy metal and saline pressure, many microorganisms associated with mangrove plants have developed mechanisms to counteract these stressors.
Of the isolates obtained in this study, P. flexa 7BS3110 was the endophytic bacteria that had the highest NaCl tolerance, exhibiting the greatest capacity to grow in the presence of sodium chloride (12.5% w/v) and, as such, can be categorized as a halotolerant bacterium [96]. As shown in Table 4, other researchers have demonstrated that different mangrove species located in various parts of the world serve as sources of halotolerant microorganisms [97]. In fact, it is worth highlighting, that in our case, this is the first recorded strain of Prexia flexa identified as a halotolerant endophyte in A. germinans from the Colombian Caribbean. In addition, it is more tolerant to NaCl than any other specimens examined in an estuarine ecosystem [98,99,100,101,102,103]. In relation to heavy metal exposure, the obtained results with the polyresistant P. flexa 7BS3110 show its tolerance to higher concentrations than other described microorganisms, such as Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34+, a polyresistant bacterium used in many tolerance studies as a positive control [104], or other endophytic bacteria, especially with regard to Pb2+, Hg2+, Cr+3, and Ni2+ [105,106,107]. According to the data in Table 2, the MICs of P. flexa 7BS3110 were higher for some heavy metals, despite having been isolated from a mangrove ecosystem apparently less exposed to heavy metal contamination.
In the case of mercury, there are few studies of tolerance in endophytic bacteria to this extremely toxic metalloid (Table 4); in one of them, this was lower than those shown by the P. flexa 7BS3110 strain evaluated in this study [108,109]. The effects of exposure to high concentrations of mercury on P. flexa 7BS3110 became evident with the morphology changes observed with SEM (Figure 2E). This phenomenon of cell size change has also been reported in a strain of Baccillus pumilus exposed to different heavy metals [110]. On the other hand, when P. flexa 7B3110 was grown in the presence of Hg2+ and NaCl, its ability to tolerate Hg2+ up to 5% (w/v) of NaCl was observed. This can be considered a consequence of its exposure within the mangrove ecosystem to both stressors in the Balboa swamp. Few studies have evaluated the exposure of both extruders, however, the described tolerance ranges to Hg2+ in the presence of NaCl are in the range of 5–10% (w/v) [111,112]. In fact, halotolerant bacteria resistant to mercury and lead from hypersaline lakes in Nigeria have been reported [113].
Numerous are the mechanisms that bacteria employ to tolerate high heavy metal concentrations. In fact, some are common, among them efflux, intracellular bioaccumulation, extracellular sequestration, and biotransformation [28]. In the case of mercury, the main mechanism is its enzymatic reduction once it has entered the cell through a series of transporters, all of which are encoded by the mer operon [67]. However, according to the analysis of the P. flexa 7BS3110 genome, it was found to possess only the enzymes MerA and the MerR regulator, but no transporters for inorganic mercury such as MerT could be identified (Table 3). The simplicity of the mer operon found in P. flexa 7BS3110 is underscored by the fact that primitive bacteria of the order Aquificales only harbor the merA gene at the chromosomal level, and its complexity has evolved through horizontal gene transfer to enhance the Hg2+ detoxification system within the Mer system [114]. In fact, genes like merG and merB, responsible for methylmercury degradation, constitute a system that is less common in bacteria possessing merA [114]. In this context, the full capability for mercury volatilization within this endophytic bacterium is limited, leading to the assumption that the heightened tolerance of this microorganism to this metalloid may be attributed to extracellular sequestration, as suggested by the performed TEM analysis of P. flexa 7BS3110 (Figure 3D,F).
Among the extracellular sequestration strategies for mercury, binding to bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS) has been reported [115]. The EPS possess functional groups with charges that confer adsorptive and adhesive properties [116]. The ability to synthesize EPS by P. flexa (previously Bacillus flexus) has been reported in a strain isolated from marine sediments in the Mediterranean. Characterization of this strain revealed that its EPS are composed of at least 24% sulfate, predominantly featuring glucuronic acid, galacturonic acid, glucose, and mannose [117]. In our study, many of the protein sequences for EPS synthesis reported for the Bacillus genus [66] were found in P. flexa 7BS3110 (Table 3 and Table S2 of Supplementary Material). These proteins include EpsA and EpsB as regulators and determining polysaccharide chain length, EpsD for chain elongation, EpsG and EpsF for repeat synthesis of sugar units, and the EpsM for polymerization and/or secretion. Although P. flexa 7BS3110 does not have all the proteins reported in the synthesis of exopolysaccharides, it has some of the key proteins associated with each phase of the EPS production process [66]. In this sense, mercury can interact with carbohydrate-rich EPS and their carboxyl, phosphoryl, and sulfhydryl groups [118,119], This could be a possible mechanism by which mercury binds to the cell structure of P. flexa 7BS3110, thus removing it from solution. On the other hand, the absence of metallothionein sequences, such as the SmtA protein responsible for intracellular sequestration in P. flexa 7BS3110 (Table 3 and Table S2 of Supplementary Material) and the absence of electrodense zones within the cell through TEM analysis (Figure 3D,F), rule out a possible intracellular accumulation mechanism. In fact, according to the literature, the percentage of mercury-resistant bacteria isolated from marine environments utilizing this mechanism is rather low [120].
In the case of lead, the presence of protein sequences leading to EPS synthesis can also be associated with P flexa 7BS3110’s tolerance to this metal, since a specific binding of this metal to EPS has been reported [121,122,123]. Therefore, protein sequences linked to the synthesis of siderophores that are correlated with the resistance to this metal and its transport were sought in the literature [79,124]. Due to the identification of only the sequences of enzymes associated with the recognition and transport of siderophores, this mechanism can be ruled out (Table 3 and Table S2 of Supplementary Material). Additionally, no lead-specific binding proteins were identified for the efflux mechanisms (Table 3 and Table S2 of Supplementary Material), despite the fact that these mechanisms are known for their high specificity to this metal [77,125]. The presence, however, of the P-type ATPase transporter sequence CadA and its regulator CadC, could suggest that the mechanism employed by P. flexa 7BS3110 to tolerate high Pb2+ concentrations is probably efflux, facilitated by these transporters (Table 3 and Table S2 of Supplementary Material). Although recognized primarily for cadmium transport, these transporters have also been shown to be involved in the cellular efflux of lead [126,127,128].
As for P. flexa 7B3110 Cr3+ resistance, although many studies have focused on bacteria Cr6+ resistance, recently, the Cr3+ toxicity on Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli has been evaluated, showing effect on growth and membrane cell at 0.19 mM of Cr3+ [84]; in addition, some environmental isolates have shown tolerance around 28 mM of trivalent chromium [129]. However, considering that Cr3+ and Cr6+ can be interconverted by oxidation or reduction reactions [130], in this study, we considered the mechanisms for both Cr3+ and Cr6+ tolerance. The presence of a specific efflux mechanism like the ChrA protein, an efflux protein driven by the membrane potential, and ChrB, a chromate-sensing regulator, could facilitate its extrusion [83,131]. However, it has been reported that the presence of this mechanism only cannot explain by itself the Cr6+ resistance [83]. In this sense, in the case of P. flexa 7BS3110, its high Cr3+ resistance could be also due to the presence of different reductases sequences, such as NfsA, NfsB, AzoR, and NemA, because different studies have shown that these reductases have chromate reductase as a secondary function [132,133]. Likewise, we only identified three protein sequences, CysC, CysL, and CysP, associated with sulfur homeostasis, which have also been related to chromium resistance [134]. The Sod protein sequence, a superoxide dismutase able to counteract oxidative stress upon exposure to ROS [130], was identified; it is a mechanism present in chromium-resistant bacteria to avoid heavy-metal toxicity [135].
The moderate resistance to the other heavy metals of the 7BS3110 isolate (Table 1 and Table S2 of Supplementary Material) is probably related to the presence of protein sequences for the synthesis of bacillithiol compounds. Thiols are compounds that play a role in detoxifying metal stressors; in fact, they have been linked to the detoxification of mercury through binding to this metal prior to its reduction [114]. However, in the case of the endophytic strain P. flexa 7BS3110, it is possible that the mercury does not enter the cell, so the role of thiol must be focused on buffering and metal ion homeostasis, thereby safeguarding cells from metal ion intoxication [74,136].
Finally, P. flexa 7BS3110 was able to remove 96% of a medium with of 14 mg/L of Hg2+ after 4 days of incubation (Figure 3A). The variations in the removal efficiency depend on the strain used and the tested medium [137]. In this respect, a strain of Bacillus spp., isolated from heavy-metal-contaminated soils, demonstrated a Hg2+ reduction effectiveness ranging from 62% to 97% in a medium with 10 mg/L of the metalloid [138]. In addition, bacteria isolated from wastewater, such as Stenotrophomonains maltophilia and Pseudomonas stutzeri, achieved removal efficiencies close to 100% at a solution of 20 mg/L de HgCl2 [139]. In turn, the percentage of Hg2+ bioaccumulation of Acinetobacter junii and Pseudomonas stutzeri was 76% and 90%, respectively, when incubated in the presence of 50 mg/L of Hg2+ [140]. According to these results, it can be concluded that the reduction percentage obtained in this study falls within a competitive range with previous studies, suggesting that the endophytic strain P. flexa 7BS3110 exhibits high mercury removal efficiency. Furthermore, P. flexa 7BS3110 can remove Hg2+ from solution in the presence of 5% (w/v) NaCl. This ability has also been reported for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, isolated from Keputih non-active sanitary landfill leachate, Surabaya, Indonesia, which was able to eliminate mercury with a percentage close to 100% at a 10% salinity when incubated in the presence of 10 mg/L of Hg2+ [141].

5. Conclusions

Mangrove ecosystems are recognized for their high resilience to natural phenomena and anthropogenic activities, which makes them a strategic ecosystem for climate change adaptation. Endophytic microorganisms are characterized by promoting the growth of their host plant under biotic (e.g., resistance to phytopathogens) and abiotic (e.g., salinity, drought, and heavy metals) stress conditions.
In our pioneering study in the Colombian Caribbean, we identified a halotolerant endophytic strain of the mangrove Avicennia germinans identified as Priestia flexa 7BS3110. This strain not only proved to be able to resist up to 12.5% NaCl, but also stands out for its multi-resistance to heavy metals such as Pb, Cr, and Hg. In addition, its ability to sequester mercury from the culture medium has been demonstrated.
The potential of P. flexa 7BS3110 for bioremediation is particularly remarkable, due to its ability to resist heavy metals and high salt concentrations. This makes it an excellent candidate for programs aimed at recovering and restoring aquatic ecosystems including freshwater bodies, seawater, and estuaries contaminated by heavy metals. In addition, P. flexa 7BS3110 could be used in the bioremediation of hypersaline soils in terrestrial ecosystems promoting sustainable agricultural practices that improve crop productivity in soils affected by salinity and/or heavy metals.
Considering that mangroves are resilient ecosystems and sentinels of climate change, it is necessary to continue researching and searching for alternatives for bioremediation, bioprospecting, biofertilization, biocontrol, and the improvement of agricultural activities. These ecosystems host microorganisms with unique capabilities that can favor environmental restoration by mitigating the adverse effects of anthropogenic activities and climate change. Although this study reports a strain with potential agrobiotechnological applications, further studies on microbial diversity and its interactions with mangrove plants are needed, to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying mangrove resilience and the potential for innovative biotechnological applications.
In summary, the findings on the endophytic strain P. flexa 7BS3110 highlight the relevance of mangrove endophytic microorganisms and the valuable contributions they can offer to environmental and agricultural biotechnology by providing alternatives with which to address global environmental challenges.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12091857/s1, Table S1. Genome characteristics and assembly quality of P. flexa 7B3110 and other species of the genus Priestia. Figure S1. Phylogenetic tree of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences of P. flexa 7BS310 and other related species. Table S2. Analysis of the presence of protein sequences associated with Hg2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, and Cr6+ resistance in the genome of P. flexa 7BS3110.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A.; methodology, Z.E.S.-V., C.J.O.-S. and H.J.B.-A.; software, J.M.M.; validation, Z.E.S.-V., C.J.O.-S. and H.J.B.-A.; formal analysis, Z.E.S.-V., C.J.O.-S., J.M.M., N.C.-P. and A.R.-M.; investigation, Z.E.S.-V., C.J.O.-S., H.J.B.-A. and N.R.; resources, R.A.; data curation, Z.E.S.-V., J.M.M., N.C.-P. and A.R.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.E.S.-V., C.J.O.-S., H.J.B.-A. and J.M.M.; writing—review and editing, R.A.; visualization, N.R. and Z.E.S.-V.; supervision, R.A.; funding acquisition, H.J.B.-A. and C.J.O.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Sistema General de Regalias (SGR) de Colombia under grant number BPIN 2022000100074. The APC was funded by the same grant and the Universidad Simón Bolívar.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to Shersy Vega Benites, Nataly Solano Llanos, and Giovanna Reyes Almeida for their technical support during the sampling process. Additionally, special thanks to María Auxiliadora Iglesias Navas and Hernando Sánchez Moreno, researchers at Universidad Simón Bolívar, for their invaluable administrative assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kochoni, B.I.; Avakoudjo, H.G.G.; Kamelan, T.M.; Sinsin, C.B.L.; Kouamelan, E.P. Contribution of Mangroves Ecosystems to Coastal Communities’ Resilience towards Climate Change: A Case Study in Southern Cote d’Ivoire. GeoJournal 2023, 88, 3935–3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alongi, D.M. The Impact of Climate Change on Mangrove Forests. Curr. Clim. Chang. Rep. 2015, 1, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Villate Daza, D.A.; Moreno, H.S.; Portz, L.; Manzolli, R.P.; Bolívar-Anillo, H.J.; Anfuso, G. Mangrove Forests Evolution and Threats in the Caribbean Sea of Colombia. Water 2020, 12, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bolívar-Anillo, H.J.; Anfuso, G.; Chacón Abarca, S.; Badillo Romero, M.D.; Villate Daza, D.A.; Serrano, M.C.; Sánchez Moreno, H. Natural Processes and Human Actuations: Impacts on Mangrove Forests of South America. Rev. Costas 2020, 2, 211–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Agudelo, C.M.; Bolívar, J.; Polanía, J.; Urrego, L.E.; Yepes, A.; Sierra, A. Estructura y Composición Florística de Los Manglares de La Bahía de Cispatá, Caribe Colombiano. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2015, 63, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Valero, N.O.; Barraza, B.; Medina, A.M. Un Escenario Para El Uso de Microorganismos Del Manglar Como Inoculantes Microbianos En Colombia. Biociencias 2011, 6, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sánchez-Moreno, H.; Bolívar-Anillo, H.J.; Villate-Daza, D.A.; Escobar-Olaya, G.; Anfuso, G. Influencia de Los Impactos Antrópicos Sobre La Evolución Del Bosque de Manglar En Puerto Colombia (Mar Caribe Colombiano). Rev. Latinoam. Recur. Nat. 2019, 15, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kulkarni, R.; Deobagkar, D.; Zinjarde, S. Metals in Mangrove Ecosystems and Associated Biota: A Global Perspective. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 153, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Milly, P.C.D.; Dunne, K.A.; Vecchia, A. V Global Pattern of Trends in Streamflow and Water Availability in a Changing Climate. Nature 2005, 438, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fuentes-Gandara, F.; Pinedo-Hernández, J.; Gutiérrez, E.; Marrugo-Negrete, J.; Díez, S. Heavy Metal Pollution and Toxicity Assessment in Mallorquin Swamp: A Natural Protected Heritage in the Caribbean Sea, Colombia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 167, 112271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fuentes-Gandara, F.; Pinedo-Hernández, J.; Marrugo-Negrete, J.; Díez, S. Human Health Impacts of Exposure to Metals through Extreme Consumption of Fish from the Colombian Caribbean Sea. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alonso, D.; Pineda, P.; Olivero, J.; González, H.; Campos, N. Mercury Levels in Muscle of Two Fish Species and Sediments from the Cartagena Bay and the Cienaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 109, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vareda, J.P.; Valente, A.J.M.; Durães, L. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution from Anthropogenic Activities and Remediation Strategies: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 246, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, C.; Zhou, K.; Qin, W.; Tian, C.; Qi, M.; Yan, X.; Han, W. A Review on Heavy Metals Contamination in Soil: Effects, Sources, and Remediation Techniques. Soil Sediment Contam. 2019, 28, 380–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy Metal Pollution in the Environment and Their Toxicological Effects on Humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Akpor, O.B.; Muchie, M. Remediation of Heavy Metals in Drinking Water and Wastewater Treatment Systems: Processes and Applications. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2010, 5, 1807–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metal Toxicity and the Environment. In Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology, 1st ed.; Luch, A., Ed.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012; Volume 101, pp. 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharma, P.; Kumar, S. Bioremediation of Heavy Metals from Industrial Effluents by Endophytes and Their Metabolic Activity: Recent Advances. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 339, 125589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lata, R.; Chowdhury, S.; Gond, S.K.; White, J.F. Induction of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants by Endophytic Microbes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 66, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khare, E.; Mishra, J.; Arora, N.K. Multifaceted Interactions between Endophytes and Plant: Developments and Prospects. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tiwari, S.; Lata, C. Heavy Metal Stress, Signaling, and Tolerance Due to Plant-Associated Microbes: An Overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Srivastava, S.; Verma, P.C.; Chaudhry, V.; Singh, N.; Abhilash, P.C.; Kumar, K.V.; Sharma, N.; Singh, N. Influence of Inoculation of Arsenic-Resistant Staphylococcus arlettae on Growth and Arsenic Uptake in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. Var. R-46. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Narayanan, M.; Ma, Y. Mitigation of Heavy Metal Stress in the Soil through Optimized Interaction between Plants and Microbes. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 345, 118732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tiwari, P.; Bae, H. Trends in Harnessing Plant Endophytic Microbiome for Heavy Metal Mitigation in Plants: A Perspective. Plants 2023, 12, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ghuge, S.A.; Nikalje, G.C.; Kadam, U.S.; Suprasanna, P.; Hong, J.C. Comprehensive Mechanisms of Heavy Metal Toxicity in Plants, Detoxification, and Remediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 450, 131039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Priya, E.M.; Tamilselvi, K.S. Biotransformation of Heavy Metals by Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacteria: An Assessment. Indones. J. Soc. Environ. Issues 2023, 4, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roy, R.; Samanta, S.; Pandit, S.; Naaz, T.; Banerjee, S.; Rawat, J.M.; Chaubey, K.K.; Saha, R.P. An Overview of Bacteria-Mediated Heavy Metal Bioremediation Strategies. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2023, 196, 1712–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nanda, M.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, D.K. Multimetal Tolerance Mechanisms in Bacteria: The Resistance Strategies Acquired by Bacteria That Can Be Exploited to ‘Clean-up’ Heavy Metal Contaminants from Water. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 212, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dave, D.; Sarma, S.; Parmar, P.; Shukla, A.; Goswami, D.; Shukla, A.; Saraf, M. Microbes as a Boon for the Bane of Heavy Metals. Environ. Sustain. 2020, 3, 233–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liaqat, I.; Muhammad, N.; Ara, C.; Hanif, U.; Andleeb, S.; Arshad, M.; Aftab, M.N.; Raza, C.; Mubin, M. Bioremediation of Heavy Metals Polluted Environment and Decolourization of Black Liquor Using Microbial Biofilms. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 3985–3997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Andy, A.K.; Rajput, V.D.; Burachevskaya, M.; Gour, V.S. Exploring the Identity and Properties of Two Bacilli Strains and Their Potential to Alleviate Drought and Heavy Metal Stress. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, H.; Xia, C.; Chinnathambi, A.; Nasif, O.; Narayanan, M.; Shanmugam, S.; Lan Chi, N.T.; Pugazhendhi, A.; On-uma, R.; Jutamas, K.; et al. Optimistic Influence of Multi-Metal Tolerant Bacillus Species on Phytoremediation Potential of Chrysopogon zizanioides on Metal Contaminated Soil. Chemosphere 2023, 311, 136889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gupta, R.S.; Patel, S.; Saini, N.; Chen, S. Robust Demarcation of 17 Distinct Bacillus Species Clades, Proposed as Novel Bacillaceae Genera, by Phylogenomics and Comparative Genomic Analyses: Description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. Nov. and Proposal for an Emended Genus Bacillus Limiting It Only to the Members of the Subtilis and Cereus Clades of Species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5753–5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chathalingath, N.; Kingsly, J.S.; Gunasekar, A. Biosynthesis and biodegradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from Priestia flexa; A promising mangrove halophyte towards the development of sustainable eco-friendly bioplastics. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 267, 127270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shukla, A.; Gupta, A.; Srivastava, S. Bacterial Consortium (Priestia endophytica NDAS01F, Bacillus licheniformis NDSA24R, and Priestia flexa NDAS28R) and Thiourea Mediated Amelioration of Arsenic Stress and Growth Improvement of Oryza sativa L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 195, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abou-Shanab, R.A.I.; van Berkum, P.; Angle, J.S. Heavy Metal Resistance and Genotypic Analysis of Metal Resistance Genes in Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria Present in Ni-Rich Serpentine Soil and in the Rhizosphere of Alyssum murale. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ugboma, C.J.; Sampson, T.; Mbonu, N.E. Bioremediation of Heavy Metals from Artisanal Crude Oil Refinery (Kpo-Fire) Impacted Soil Using Bacillus flexus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Ngie Community, Degema Local Government Area, Rivers State, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2021, 24, 2049–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jebeli, M.A.; Maleki, A.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Kalantar, E.; Izanloo, H.; Gharibi, F. Bacillus flexus Strain As-12, a New Arsenic Transformer Bacterium Isolated from Contaminated Water Resources. Chemosphere 2017, 169, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fundación Guardaguas de Ecosistemas Marinos y Costeros “Bocas de Ceniza Waterkeeper”. Programa de Conservación y Restauración de los Ecosistemas Costeros del Departamento del Atlántico: Medidas de Prevención, Control y Reducción de Fuentes Terrestres de Contaminación y Procesos de Erosión Costera en una Primera Fase. Available online: https://www.bocasdecenizawaterkeeper.org/sites/default/files/EBOOK%20FUNDACION%20GUARDAGUAS.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2023).
  40. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (INVEMAR). Ordenamiento Ambiental de La Zona Costera Del Departamento Del Atlántico 2007. Available online: http://www.invemar.org.co/redcostera1/invemar/docs/zcatlantico.pdf (accessed on 8 November 2023).
  41. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (INVEMAR). Informe del Estado de los Ambientes Marinos y Costeros en Colombia: Año 2000. Available online: https://www.invemar.org.co/redcostera1/invemar/docs/EAMC_2000/INVEMAR_INF_EAMC_2000_02.pdf (accessed on 4 December 2023).
  42. Potshangbam, M.; Devi, I.; Sahoo, D.; Strobel, G. Functional Characterization of Endophytic Fungal Community Associated with Oryza sativa L. and Zea mays L. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shahid, M.; Hameed, S.; Tariq, M.; Zafar, M.; Ali, A.; Ahmad, N. Characterization of Mineral Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria for Enhanced Sunflower Growth and Yield-Attributing Traits. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 1525–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wilson, K. Preparation of Genomic DNA from Bacteria. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2001, 56, 2–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A Flexible Trimmer for Illumina Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rozov, R.; Kav, A.B.; Bogumil, D.; Shterzer, N.; Halperin, E.; Mizrahi, I.; Shamir, R. Recycler: An Algorithm for Detecting Plasmids from de Novo Assembly Graphs. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boetzer, M.; Henkel, C.V.; Jansen, H.J.; Butler, D.; Pirovano, W. Scaffolding Pre-Assembled Contigs Using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 578–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nadalin, F.; Vezzi, F.; Policriti, A. GapFiller: A de Novo Assembly Approach to Fill the Gap within Paired Reads. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13, S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mikheenko, A.; Prjibelski, A.; Saveliev, V.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A. Versatile Genome Assembly Evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i142–i150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Gunturu, S.; Harvey, W.T.; Rosselló-Mora, R.; Tiedje, J.M.; Cole, J.R.; Konstantinidis, K.T. The Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) Webserver: Taxonomic and Gene Diversity Analysis of Archaea and Bacteria at the Whole Genome Level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W282–W288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.-P.; Göker, M. Genome Sequence-Based Species Delimitation with Confidence Intervals and Improved Distance Functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chun, J.; Oren, A.; Ventosa, A.; Christensen, H.; Arahal, D.R.; da Costa, M.S.; Rooney, A.P.; Yi, H.; Xu, X.W.; De Meyer, S.; et al. Proposed Minimal Standards for the Use of Genome Data for the Taxonomy of Prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations Using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Blum, M.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Pinto, B.L.; Salazar, G.A.; Bileschi, M.L.; Bork, P.; Bridge, A.; Colwell, L.; et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D418–D427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Reynolds, E.S. The Use of Lead Citrate at High pH as an Electron-Opaque Stain in Electron Microscopy. J. Cell. Biol. 1963, 17, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bagchi, D.; Stohs, S.J.; Downs, B.W.; Bagchi, M.; Preuss, H.G. Cytotoxicity and Oxidative Mechanisms of Different Forms of Chromium. Toxicology 2002, 180, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mehdi, Z.; Jamshid, G.G.; Yahya, E.; Fayyaz, E. Effects of Different Levels of Copper Sulfate on Performance in Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Int. J. Biosci. 2014, 4, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jakubowski, M. Zinc and Cadmium Compounds. In Patty’s Toxicology; Bingham, E., Cohrssen, B., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-0-470-41081-3. [Google Scholar]
  60. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Coppers; Office of Pesticide Programs, Ed.; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
  61. Al-Zubaidi, E.S.; Rabee, A.M. Effect of Mercuric Chloride on Biochemical and Hematological Parameters in Male Albino Mice. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 2319–7064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Apaydin, F.G.; Kalender, S.; Bas, H.; Demir, F.; Kalender, Y. Lead Nitrate Induced Testicular Toxicity in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Rats: Protective Role of Sodium Selenite. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2015, 58, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Henderson, R.G.; Durando, J.; Oller, A.R.; Merkel, D.J.; Marone, P.A.; Bates, H.K. Acute Oral Toxicity of Nickel Compounds. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2012, 62, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Diaby, V.; Adou Yapo, F.; Arsène Mousan, A.; Dosso, M.; Allico Djama, J.; Vandjiguiba, D.; Adou Francis, Y.; Mireille, D.; Allico Joseph, D. Renal, Hepatic and Splenic Biotoxicity of Cadmium Sulphate in the Wistar Rats. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. Res. 2016, 4, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  65. Toropov, V.; Demyanova, E.; Shalaeva, O.; Sitkin, S.; Vakhitov, T. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Lactobacillus Helveticus D75 and D76 Confirms Safety and Probiotic Potential. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wei, X.; Chen, Z.; Liu, A.; Yang, L.; Xu, Y.; Cao, M.; He, N. Advanced Strategies for Metabolic Engineering of Bacillus to Produce Extracellular Polymeric Substances. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 67, 108199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Priyadarshanee, M.; Chatterjee, S.; Rath, S.; Dash, H.R.; Das, S. Cellular and Genetic Mechanism of Bacterial Mercury Resistance and Their Role in Biogeochemistry and Bioremediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 126985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Van Kranenburg, R.; Marugg, J.D.; Van Swam, I.I.; Willem, N.J.; De Vos, W.M. Molecular Characterization of the Plasmid-encoded Eps Gene Cluster Essential for Exopolysaccharide Biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis. Mol. Microbiol. 1997, 24, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wu, R.; Qin, Y.; Shen, Q.; Li, P. The Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus Velezensis LPL061, an Exopolysaccharide-Producing Bacterium. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Newman, J.A.; Rodrigues, C.; Lewis, R.J. Molecular Basis of the Activity of SinR Protein, the Master Regulator of Biofilm Formation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 10766–10778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Palmiter, R.D. Molecular Biology of Metallothionein Gene Expression. In Metallothionein II; Kägi, J.H.R., Kojima, Y., Eds.; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 1987; Volume 52, pp. 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Domı́nguez-Solı́s, J.R.; Gutiérrez-Alcalá, G.; Romero, L.C.; Gotor, C. The Cytosolic O-Acetylserine (Thiol)Lyase Gene Is Regulated by Heavy Metals and Can Function in Cadmium Tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 9297–9302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ndu, U.; Barkay, T.; Mason, R.P.; Schartup, A.T.; Al-Farawati, R.; Liu, J.; Reinfelder, J.R. The Use of a Mercury Biosensor to Evaluate the Bioavailability of Mercury-Thiol Complexes and Mechanisms of Mercury Uptake in Bacteria. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chandrangsu, P.; Van Loi, V.; Antelmann, H.; Helmann, J.D. The Role of Bacillithiol in Gram-Positive Firmicutes. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 28, 445–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hobman, J.L.; Julian, D.J.; Brown, N.L. Cysteine Coordination of Pb(II) Is Involved in the PbrR-Dependent Activation of the Lead-Resistance Promoter, PpbrA, from Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nong, Q.; Yuan, K.; Li, Z.; Chen, P.; Huang, Y.; Hu, L.; Jiang, J.; Luan, T.; Chen, B. Bacterial Resistance to Lead: Chemical Basis and Environmental Relevance. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 85, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jarosławiecka, A.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z. Lead Resistance in Micro-Organisms. Microbiology 2014, 160, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Maglangit, F.; Alrashdi, S.; Renault, J.; Trembleau, L.; Victoria, C.; Tong, M.H.; Wang, S.; Kyeremeh, K.; Deng, H. Characterization of the Promiscuous N -Acyl CoA Transferase, LgoC, in Legonoxamine Biosynthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 2219–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rajkumar, M.; Ae, N.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Freitas, H. Potential of Siderophore-Producing Bacteria for Improving Heavy Metal Phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Carroll, C.S.; Moore, M.M. Ironing out Siderophore Biosynthesis: A Review of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthetase (NRPS)-Independent Siderophore Synthetases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 53, 356–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. He, Y.; Dong, L.; Zhou, S.; Jia, Y.; Gu, R.; Bai, Q.; Gao, J.; Li, Y.; Xiao, H. Chromium Resistance Characteristics of Cr(VI) Resistance Genes ChrA and ChrB in Serratia sp. S2. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 157, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ramírez-Díaz, M.I.; Díaz-Pérez, C.; Vargas, E.; Riveros-Rosas, H.; Campos-García, J.; Cervantes, C. Mechanisms of Bacterial Resistance to Chromium Compounds. BioMetals 2008, 21, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Viti, C.; Marchi, E.; Decorosi, F.; Giovannetti, L. Molecular Mechanisms of Cr(VI) Resistance in Bacteria and Fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38, 633–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fathima, A.; Rao, J.R. Is Cr(III) Toxic to Bacteria: Toxicity Studies Using Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli as Model Organism. Arch. Microbiol. 2018, 200, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Reclus, É. Viaje a La Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, 1st ed.; Editorial Unimagdalena: Santa Marta, Colombia, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Restrepo, J.D.; López, S.A. Morphodynamics of the Pacific and Caribbean Deltas of Colombia, South America. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2008, 25, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Anfuso, G.; Rangel-Buitrago, N.; Correa Arango, I.D. Evolution of Sandspits Along the Caribbean Coast of Colombia: Natural and Human Influences. In Sand and Gravel Spits, 1st ed.; Randazzo, G., Jackson, D.W.T., Cooper, J.A.G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ortiz-Romero, L.T.; Delgado-Tascón, J.G.; Pardo-Rodríguez, D.A.; Murillo-Perea, E.; Guio Duque, A.J. Heavy Metals Determination and Quality Indexes in Water and Sediments from Magdalena River–Tolima Tract, Colombia. Rev. Tumbaga 2015, 2, 43–60. [Google Scholar]
  89. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (INVEMAR). Diagnóstico y Evaluación de La Calidad de Las Aguas Marinas y Costeras En El Caribe y Pacífico Colombianos 2007. Available online: https://alfresco.invemar.org.co/share/s/q1nxpommtz-f0khzp_kh6a (accessed on 5 June 2023).
  90. Chacón Serrano, S.; Serrano, M.C.; Bolívar-Anillo, H.J.; Villate Daza, D.A.; Sánchez Moreno, H.; Anfuso, G. Bosques de Manglar Del Caribe Norte Colombiano: Análisis, Evolución y Herramientas de Gestión. Rev. Latinoam. Recur. Nat. 2020, 16, 31–54. [Google Scholar]
  91. Arumugam, G.; Rajendran, R.; Ganesan, A.; Sethu, R. Bioaccumulation and Translocation of Heavy Metals in Mangrove Rhizosphere Sediments to Tissues of Avicennia Marina–A Field Study from Tropical Mangrove Forest. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2018, 10, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Abeywardhana, D.C.; Adikaram, N.M.; Kularatne, R.K.A. Are Mangrove Forests Reliable Sinks of Heavy Metals Due to Phytoremediation and Other Mechanisms? A Sri Lankan Perspective. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 177, 113453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Analuddin, K.; Sharma, S.; Jamili; Septiana, A.; Sahidin, I.; Rianse, U.; Nadaoka, K. Heavy Metal Bioaccumulation in Mangrove Ecosystem at the Coral Triangle Ecoregion, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 125, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yan, Z.; Sun, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, X. Accumulation and Tolerance of Mangroves to Heavy Metals: A Review. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2017, 3, 302–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Almahasheer, H.; Serrano, O.; Duarte, C.M.; Irigoien, X. Remobilization of Heavy Metals by Mangrove Leaves. Front. Mar. Sci. 2018, 5, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Margesin, R.; Schinner, F. Potential of Halotolerant and Halophilic Microorganisms for Biotechnology. Extremophiles 2001, 5, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sebastianes, F.L.S.; de Azevedo, J.L.; Lacava, P.T. Diversity and Biotechnological Potential of Endophytic Microorganisms Associated with Tropical Mangrove Forests. In Diversity and Benefits of Microorganisms from the Tropics, 1st ed.; De Azevedo, J.L., Quecine, M.C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Munawar, M.; Hakeem, K.R.; Alharby, H.F.; Anwar, Y.; Bamagoos, A.; Shah, M.; Abdul Sattar, F.; Sayeed Akhtar, M. Isolation and Identification of Salt-Tolerant Mangrove Endophyte from Red Sea Coast Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Energy Environ. Focus 2023, 7, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, F.N.; Zheng, Z.Q.; Chen, M.S.; Chen, X.H.; Tuo, L. Ancylobacter mangrovi sp. Nov., a Novel Endophytic Bacterium Isolated Form Mangrove Plant. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 46, 126419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Deepika, D.S.; Lavanya, J.; Sridevi, M. Screening of Salt Tolerant Endophytic Bacteria with Plant Growth Promoting Characters Isolated from Acanthus ilicifolius L., a Species of Mangrove Ecosystem Located at Corangi Wildlife Sanctuary, Andhra Pradesh. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2023, 15, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Soldan, R.; Mapelli, F.; Crotti, E.; Schnell, S.; Daffonchio, D.; Marasco, R.; Fusi, M.; Borin, S.; Cardinale, M. Bacterial Endophytes of Mangrove Propagules Elicit Early Establishment of the Natural Host and Promote Growth of Cereal Crops under Salt Stress. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 223–225, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lavanya, J.; Sandhya Deepika, D.; Sridevi, M. Screening and Isolation of Plant Growth Promoting, Halotolerant Endophytic Bacteria from Mangrove Plant Avicennia officinalis L. at Coastal Region of Corangi Andhra Pradesh. Agric. Sci. Dig. 2023, 43, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chen, M.S.; Li, F.N.; Chen, X.H.; Yan, X.R.; Tuo, L. Brachybacterium halotolerans sp. Nov., a Halotolerant, Endophytic Actinomycete Isolated from Branch of Bruguiera gymnoirhiza. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2021, 114, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shaw, D.R.; Dussan, J. Mathematical Modelling of Toxic Metal Uptake and Efflux Pump in Metal-Resistant Bacterium Bacillus cereus Isolated from Heavy Crude Oil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Guo, H.; Luo, S.; Chen, L.; Xiao, X.; Xi, Q.; Wei, W.; Zeng, G.; Liu, C.; Wan, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Bioremediation of Heavy Metals by Growing Hyperaccumulaor Endophytic Bacterium bacillus sp. L14. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8599–8605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Luo, S.; Wan, Y.; Xiao, X.; Guo, H.; Chen, L.; Xi, Q.; Zeng, G.; Liu, C.; Chen, J. Isolation and Characterization of Endophytic Bacterium LRE07 from Cadmium Hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and Its Potential for Remediation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, 1637–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhang, Y.F.; He, L.Y.; Chen, Z.J.; Zhang, W.H.; Wang, Q.Y.; Qian, M.; Sheng, X.F. Characterization of Lead-Resistant and ACC Deaminase-Producing Endophytic Bacteria and Their Potential in Promoting Lead Accumulation of Rape. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1720–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mello, I.S.; Pietro-Souza, W.; Barros, B.M.; da Silva, G.F.; Campos, M.L.; Soares, M.A. Endophytic Bacteria Mitigate Mercury Toxicity to Host Plants. Symbiosis 2019, 79, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Salmi, A.; Boulila, F. Heavy Metals Multi-Tolerant Bradyrhizobium Isolated from Mercury Mining Region in Algeria. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 289, 112547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nithya, C.; Gnanalakshmi, B.; Pandian, S.K. Assessment and Characterization of Heavy Metal Resistance in Palk Bay Sediment Bacteria. Mar. Environ. Res. 2011, 71, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zulaika, E.; Sembiring, L.; Soegianto, A. Characterization and Identification of Mercury-Resistant Bacteria from Kalimas River Surabaya-Indonesia By Numerical Phenetic Taxonomy. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res. 2012, 2, 7263–7269. [Google Scholar]
  112. Bisane, K.D. Population diversity and cyclicity of fruit fly (Bactrocera spp.) in sapota orchard under South Gujarat condition. Indian J. Ecol. 2017, 44, 369–374. [Google Scholar]
  113. Orji, O.U.; Awoke, J.N.; Aja, P.M.; Aloke, C.; Obasi, O.D.; Alum, E.U.; Udu-Ibiam, O.E.; Oka, G.O. Halotolerant and Metalotolerant Bacteria Strains with Heavy Metals Biorestoration Possibilities Isolated from Uburu Salt Lake, Southeastern, Nigeria. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Boyd, E.S.; Barkay, T. The Mercury Resistance Operon: From an Origin in a Geothermal Environment to an Efficient Detoxification Machine. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Oyetibo, G.O.; Miyauchi, K.; Suzuki, H.; Ishikawa, S.; Endo, G. Extracellular Mercury Sequestration by Exopolymeric Substances Produced by Yarrowia spp.: Thermodynamics, Equilibria, and Kinetics Studies. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2016, 122, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kailasam, S.; Arumugam, S.; Balaji, K.; Vinodh Kanth, S. Adsorption of Chromium by Exopolysaccharides Extracted from Lignolytic Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 206, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Abdelnasser, S.M.; Yahya, S.M.M.; Mohamed, W.F.; Asker, M.M.S.; Abu Shady, H.M.; Mahmoud, M.G.; Gadallah, M.A. Antitumor Exopolysaccharides Derived from Novel Marine Bacillus: Isolation, Characterization Aspect and Biological Activity. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2017, 18, 1847–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Dash, H.R.; Das, S. Interaction between Mercuric Chloride and Extracellular Polymers of Biofilm-Forming Mercury Resistant Marine Bacterium: Bacillus thuringiensis PW-05. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 109793–109802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dash, H.R.; Basu, S.; Das, S. Evidence of Mercury Trapping in Biofilm-EPS and mer Operon-Based Volatilization of Inorganic Mercury in a Marine Bacterium Bacillus cereus BW-201B. Arch. Microbiol. 2017, 199, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Dash, H.R.; Das, S. Diversity, Community Structure, and Bioremediation Potential of Mercury-Resistant Marine Bacteria of Estuarine and Coastal Environments of Odisha, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 6960–6971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mathivanan, K.; Uthaya Chandirika, J.; Srinivasan, R.; Emmanuel Charles, P.; Rajaram, R.; Zhang, R. Exopolymeric Substances Production by Bacillus cereus KMS3-1 Enhanced Its Biosorption Efficiency in Removing Cd2+ and Pb2+ in Single and Binary Metal Mixtures. Environ. Res. 2023, 228, 115917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Martis, B.S.; Mohan, A.K.; Chiplunkar, S.; Kamath, S.; Goveas, L.C.; Rao, C.V. Bacterium Isolated from Coffee Waste Pulp Biosorps Lead: Investigation of EPS Mediated Mechanism. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2021, 2, 100029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Guibaud, G.; Bordas, F.; Saaid, A.; D’abzac, P.; Van Hullebusch, E. Effect of pH on Cadmium and Lead Binding by Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) Extracted from Environmental Bacterial Strains. Colloids Surf. B 2008, 63, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Roskova, Z.; Skarohlid, R.; McGachy, L. Siderophores: An Alternative Bioremediation Strategy? Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 819, 153144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. He, Z.; Shen, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Pan, X. Bacterial Metal(Loid) Resistance Genes (MRGs) and Their Variation and Application in Environment: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 871, 162148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Kandegedara, A.; Thiyagarajan, S.; Kondapalli, K.C.; Stemmler, T.L.; Rosen, B.P. Role of Bound Zn(II) in the CadC Cd(II)/Pb(II)/Zn(II)-Responsive Repressor. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 14958–14965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Busenlehner, L.S.; Giedroc, D.P. Kinetics of Metal Binding by the Toxic Metal-Sensing Transcriptional Repressor Staphylococcus aureus PI258 CadC. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 1024–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Sun, Y.; Wong, M.D.; Rosen, B.P. Role of Cysteinyl Residues in Sensing Pb(II), Cd(II), and Zn(II) by the Plasmid PI258 CadC Repressor. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 14955–14960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Sundar, K.; Mukherjee, A.; Sadiq, M.; Chandrasekaran, N. Cr (III) Bioremoval Capacities of Indigenous and Adapted Bacterial Strains from Palar River Basin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 187, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Plaper, A.; Jenko-Brinovec, Š.; Premzl, A.; Kos, J.; Raspor, P. Genotoxicity of Trivalent Chromium in Bacterial Cells. Possible Effects on DNA Topology. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002, 15, 943–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Mushtaq, Z.; Liaquat, M.; Nazir, A.; Liaquat, R.; Iftikhar, H.; Anwar, W.; Itrat, N. Potential of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria to Mitigate Chromium Contamination. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 28, 102826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Robins, K.J.; Hooks, D.O.; Rehm, B.H.A.; Ackerley, D.F. Escherichia coli Nema Is an Efficient Chromate Reductase That Can Be Biologically Immobilized to Provide a Cell Free System for Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kwak, Y.H.; Lee, D.S.; Kim, H.B. Vibrio harveyi Nitroreductase Is Also a Chromate Reductase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4390–4395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Aguilar-Barajas, E.; Díaz-Pérez, C.; Ramírez-Díaz, M.I.; Riveros-Rosas, H.; Cervantes, C. Bacterial Transport of Sulfate, Molybdate, and Related Oxyanions. BioMetals 2011, 24, 687–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Hu, P.; Brodie, E.L.; Suzuki, Y.; McAdams, H.H.; Andersen, G.L. Whole-Genome Transcriptional Analysis of Heavy Metal Stresses in Caulobacter crescentus. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 8437–8449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Rosario-Cruz, Z.; Boyd, J.M. Physiological Roles of Bacillithiol in Intracellular Metal Processing. Curr. Genet. 2016, 62, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Al-Ansari, M.M. Biodetoxification Mercury by Using a Marine Bacterium Marinomonas sp. RS3 and Its MerA Gene Expression under Mercury Stress. Environ. Res. 2022, 205, 112452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Yao, H.; Wang, H.; Ji, J.; Tan, A.; Song, Y.; Chen, Z. Isolation and Identification of Mercury-Tolerant Bacteria LBA119 from Molybdenum-Lead Mining Soils and Their Removal of Hg2+. Toxics 2023, 11, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Naguib, M.M.; Khairalla, A.S.; El-Gendy, A.O.; Elkhatib, W.F. Isolation and Characterization of Mercury-Resistant Bacteria from Wastewater Sources in Egypt. Can. J. Microbiol. 2019, 65, 308–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Abbas, S.Z.; Yee, C.J.; Hossain, K.; Ahmad, A.; Rafatullah, M. Isolation and Characterization of Mercury-Resistant Bacteria from Industrial Wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 138, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Imron, M.F.; Kurniawan, S.B.; Soegianto, A. Characterization of Mercury-Reducing Potential Bacteria Isolated from Keputih Non-Active Sanitary Landfill Leachate, Surabaya, Indonesia under Different Saline Conditions. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 241, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location and evolution of the Atlántico department coastline, Caribbean coast of Colombia and Balboa Swamp. (A) Colombia map with sampled region marked with red; (B) Balboa swamp in the Colombian Caribbean coastal region; (C) Magdalena river delta depicted in the early 1800s; (D) Magdalena river delta today.
Figure 1. Location and evolution of the Atlántico department coastline, Caribbean coast of Colombia and Balboa Swamp. (A) Colombia map with sampled region marked with red; (B) Balboa swamp in the Colombian Caribbean coastal region; (C) Magdalena river delta depicted in the early 1800s; (D) Magdalena river delta today.
Microorganisms 12 01857 g001
Figure 2. Effect of Hg2+ on cell morphology and growth of P. flexa 7BS3110 (A) Controls at different concentrations of NaCl without Hg2+. (B) Growth in the presence of 0.25 mM Hg2+ at different concentrations of NaCl. (C) SEM image of cells in culture without Hg2+. (D) SEM image of cells with Hg2+ (0.25 mM) at 2 days. (E) SEM image of cells with Hg2+ at 7 days.
Figure 2. Effect of Hg2+ on cell morphology and growth of P. flexa 7BS3110 (A) Controls at different concentrations of NaCl without Hg2+. (B) Growth in the presence of 0.25 mM Hg2+ at different concentrations of NaCl. (C) SEM image of cells in culture without Hg2+. (D) SEM image of cells with Hg2+ (0.25 mM) at 2 days. (E) SEM image of cells with Hg2+ at 7 days.
Microorganisms 12 01857 g002
Figure 3. Reduction and extracellular sequestration of Hg2+ by P. flexa 7BS3110. (A) Hg2+ concentration in solution at different incubation times. (B) SEM image showing the presence of EPS. (C) TEM image of cells grown without Hg2+. (D) TEM images of cells grown in the presence of 0.25 mM Hg2+. (E) TEM image of cells grown in the absence of Hg2+. (F) TEM images of cells grown in the presence of 0.25 mM Hg2+.
Figure 3. Reduction and extracellular sequestration of Hg2+ by P. flexa 7BS3110. (A) Hg2+ concentration in solution at different incubation times. (B) SEM image showing the presence of EPS. (C) TEM image of cells grown without Hg2+. (D) TEM images of cells grown in the presence of 0.25 mM Hg2+. (E) TEM image of cells grown in the absence of Hg2+. (F) TEM images of cells grown in the presence of 0.25 mM Hg2+.
Microorganisms 12 01857 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of the endophytic bacteria isolated from A. germinans.
Table 1. Characteristics of the endophytic bacteria isolated from A. germinans.
IsolatesGram Stain Result and MorphologyMaximum Concentration NaCl Tolerance (%)
1BS3110Gram-stain-positive bacilli7.5
2BS3110Gram-stain-positive bacilli10
3BS3110Gram-stain-positive cocci7.5
4BS3110Gram-stain-positive cocci10
5BS3110Gram-stain-negative bacilli10
6BS3110Gram-stain-positive cocci10
7BS3110Gram-stain-positive bacilli12.5
Table 2. LD50 of different heavy metals and MIC and MBC of Priestia flexa 7BS3110.
Table 2. LD50 of different heavy metals and MIC and MBC of Priestia flexa 7BS3110.
Heavy Metals
NameCompoundLD50
(mg/Kg)
Ref.P. flexaRef.
MIC
(mM)
BMC (mM)
ChromeCrCl3 · 6H201790[57]1550This study
CopperCuSO4 · 5H20384[58]530
ZincZnCl2528[59]130
CobaltCoSO4 · 7H2O450[60]51000
MercuryHgCl20.25–2.25 kg[61]0.010.75
LeadPb(NO3)22250[62]101000
NickelNiCl2 · 7H2O500[63]55
CadmiumCdSO4200[64]11
Table 3. Proteins associated with Hg2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, and Cr6+ resistance in P. flexa 7BS3110.
Table 3. Proteins associated with Hg2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, and Cr6+ resistance in P. flexa 7BS3110.
Mercury
ActivityProtein ProductGeneProtein CodeSimilarity Protein ResultsRef.
Extracellular
sequestration
Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis EpsAepsAAEP92472.1SFu, SDo, SCu[65,66,67]
Tyrosine kinaseepsBWFA11311.1Presence[66,67,68]
Glycosyltransferase EpsDepsDSIQ94561.1Presence[66,67,68]
Glycosytransferase EpsFepsFCAH0138532.1Presence[65,66,67]
Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis EpsGepsGWFA11306.1Presence[65,66,67]
Putative sugar transferase EpsLepsLCAH0206043.1SFu, SDo, SCu[65,66,67]
Acetyltransferase EpsMepsMSIQ94782.1Presence[66,67,69]
Aminotransferase EpsNepsNSIQ94819.1Presence[66,67,69]
Transcriptional regulator SinRSinRKFM97474.1Presence[66,67,70]
Wzz N-terminal domainWzzWP_049163267.1SFu, SDo, SCu[65,67]
mer OperonMercuric reductasemerAWP_138116160.1Presence[67]
Broad mercury transporter merEmerEBAS29549.1SCu[67]
Mercuric transportmerPQCS51148.1SFa, SDo, SFu[67]
Mercuric resistance operonmerRWP_289521299.1Presence[67]
Intra cellular
accumulation
Metalloregulator smtBsmtBWP_195783159.1SFa, SDo, SFu[71]
ThiolL-malate glycosyltransferase BshAbshAWP_210608563.1Presence[28,72,73,74]
Glucosaminide deacetylase BshB1bshB1AIC44925.1Presence[28,72,73]
Glucosaminide deacetylase BshB2bshB2WEZ07453.1Presence[28,72,73,74]
Bacillithiol synthasebshCWP_034649136.1Presence[28,72,73,74]
Lead
ActivityProtein ProductGeneProtein codeSimilarity protein resultsRef.
Specific EffluxPb-efflux protein PbrApbrACAI11271.1SFa, SDo, SFu, SCu[75,76]
Non-specific effluxTranscriptional regulator CadCcadCCAH0174756.1Presence[29]
Transcriptional regulator CmtRcmtRWP_308474560.1SFa, SDo, SFu[77]
ATP-binding protein AztAaztAWP_078614428.1SFa, SDo, SFu[77]
Metalloregulator AztRaztRWP_042466054.1SFa, SDo, SFu[77]
Cation efflux P1-ATPaseczcPABF12829.1SFa, SDo, SFu, SCu[77]
Transporting Cd2+, Zn2+, Co ATPasecadAOFC98076.1Presence[29]
Intra cellular
accumulation
Metalloregulator SmtBsmtBWP_195783159.1SFa, SDo, SFu[71,76]
SiderophoresLysine decarboxylase DesAdesAWP_302000531.1SFa[76,78,79]
Cadaverine hydroxylasedesBAOC37727.1SFa[76,78,79]
Alcaligin biosynthesis enzymealcAAAA97596.1SFa[76,79,80]
AcetyltransferasealcBWP_013084704.1SFa, SDo, SFu[76,79,80]
Siderophore transportSTraQLK07663.1SFa, SDo, SFu, SCu[76]
Siderophore related permeaseSpermQLK04956.1SFa[76]
Siderophore transport systemFeSBWP_055992581.1SDo, SUc[76]
Siderophore transport systemFePCBS89604.1SFa, SFu, SCu[76]
Siderophore transport systemFeATPSPR94826.1SFa, SDo, SFu[76]
Siderophore transport systemABCpQLK08254.1SFa, SFu, SCu[76]
Siderophore transport systemABCatpQLK04041.1SFa, SDo, DFu[76]
Siderophore transport systemABCsbQLK04038.1SDo, SUc[76]
Siderophore transport systemABCp2QLK04040.1SFa, SFu, SCu[76]
Chrome
ActivityProtein ProductGeneProtein codeSimilarity protein resultsRef.
EffluxChromate resistance effluxchrAGMG74543.1SFa, SFu, SCu[81,82]
Chromate efflux transporterchrBGMG74544.1SFa, SFu, SCu[81,82]
Sulfur or iron
homeostasis
Adenylyl sulfate kinasecysCWKU24108.1Presence[82,83]
Sulfite reductasecysLKNH16506.1Presence[82,83]
FerritinfntAWP_283880548.1SDo[82,83]
Sulfate/thiosulfate importCysACAH0220131.1SFa, SDo[82,83]
Sulfate transporter permeaseCysTWP_013082952.1Presence[82,83]
Reduction of
chromium VI
to chromium III
NADPH nitroreductaseNfsAWP_028412760.1SFa, SDo, SFu[83]
NAD(P)H oxidoreductaseNfsBWP_013083136.1SFa, SDo, SFu, SCu[83]
N-ethylmaleimide reductaseNemACAH0175675.1Presence[83]
NADH-azoreductaseAzoRADF40836.1Presence[83]
NADPH nitroreductaseFrpWP_098524731.1SFa, SDo, SFu[83]
OxidoreductaseYcnDAEN89027.1SFa, SDo, SFu[83]
AD(P)H oxidoreductaseNfoRWP_000069098.1SFa, SDo, SFu, SCu[83]
Oxidative
stress reduction
ThioredoxintrxAWP_277717273.1Presence[83]
GlutaredoxingrxAPVE91831.1SFa[83]
Superoxide dismutase SodAsodAWP_195674987.1Presence[84]
SFa: similar family protein, SFu: similar function, SDo: similar domain; SCu: similar cellular ubication.
Table 4. Tolerance to NaCl and heavy metal of endophytic bacteria shown in others works.
Table 4. Tolerance to NaCl and heavy metal of endophytic bacteria shown in others works.
BacteriaCompound/
Metal
ToleranceSourceRef.
Bacillus halotoleransNaCl3.2% (w/v)Avicennia germinans[98]
Ancylobacter mangrovi sp.NaCl7% (w/v)Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Sonneratia apetala[99]
Bacillus altitudinisNaCl8% (w/v)Acanthus ilicifolius L.[100]
Acinetobacter (Pseudomonadota)NaCl5% (w/v)Avicennia marina propagules[101]
Staphylococcus (Bacillota)NaCl10% (w/v)Avicennia marina propagules[101]
Staphylococcus (Bacillota)NaCl10% (w/v)Avicennia marina propagules[101]
Salinicola salariesNaCl10% (w/v)Avicennia officinalis L.[102]
Brachybacterium halotolerans sp.NaCl20% (w/v)Bruguiera gymnoirhiza[103]
Bacillus sp.Pb2+MIC of 4 mMSolanum nigrum L.[105]
Cr6+MIC of 12 mM
Serratia sp.Pb2+MIC of 4 mMSolanum nigrum[106]
Cr6+MIC of 12 mM
Bacillus sp.Pb2+MIC of 3.6 mMCommelina communis[107]
Cu2+MIC of 1.6 mM
Cd2+MIC of 0.9 mM
Not specifiedHg2+MIC of up to 5 mMAeschynomene fluminensis and Polygonum acuminatum[108]
Bradyrhizobium spp.Hg2+MIC > 150 μMCalicotome spinosa roots[109]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soto-Varela, Z.E.; Orozco-Sánchez, C.J.; Bolívar-Anillo, H.J.; Martínez, J.M.; Rodríguez, N.; Consuegra-Padilla, N.; Robledo-Meza, A.; Amils, R. Halotolerant Endophytic Bacteria Priestia flexa 7BS3110 with Hg2+ Tolerance Isolated from Avicennia germinans in a Caribbean Mangrove from Colombia. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1857. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12091857

AMA Style

Soto-Varela ZE, Orozco-Sánchez CJ, Bolívar-Anillo HJ, Martínez JM, Rodríguez N, Consuegra-Padilla N, Robledo-Meza A, Amils R. Halotolerant Endophytic Bacteria Priestia flexa 7BS3110 with Hg2+ Tolerance Isolated from Avicennia germinans in a Caribbean Mangrove from Colombia. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(9):1857. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12091857

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soto-Varela, Zamira E., Christian J. Orozco-Sánchez, Hernando José Bolívar-Anillo, José M. Martínez, Nuria Rodríguez, Natalia Consuegra-Padilla, Alfredo Robledo-Meza, and Ricardo Amils. 2024. "Halotolerant Endophytic Bacteria Priestia flexa 7BS3110 with Hg2+ Tolerance Isolated from Avicennia germinans in a Caribbean Mangrove from Colombia" Microorganisms 12, no. 9: 1857. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12091857

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop