Next Article in Journal
Correlation between the Antimicrobial Activity and Metabolic Profiles of Cell Free Supernatants and Membrane Vesicles Produced by Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Epidemiology of Multi-Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Hospitalized Patients in Greece
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/microorganisms8111651
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Untapped Australasian Diversity of Astaxanthin-Producing Yeasts with Biotechnological Potential—Phaffia australis sp. nov. and Phaffia tasmanica sp. nov.

by
Márcia David-Palma
1,2,
Diego Libkind
3,
Patrícia H. Brito
1,
Margarida Silva
1,
Nicolás Bellora
3,
Marco A. Coelho
1,2,
Joseph Heitman
2,
Paula Gonçalves
1 and
José Paulo Sampaio
1,*
1
UCIBIO, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
2
Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
3
Centro de Referencia en Levaduras y Tecnología Cervecera (CRELTEC), Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales (IPATEC)—CONICET/Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Rio Negro 8400, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(11), 1651; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111651
Submission received: 9 September 2020 / Revised: 18 October 2020 / Accepted: 21 October 2020 / Published: 24 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology and Immunology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phaffia is an orange-colored basidiomycetous yeast genus of the order Cystofilobasidiales that contains a single species, P. rhodozyma. This species is the only fungus known to produce the economically relevant carotenoid astaxanthin. Although Phaffia was originally found in the Northern hemisphere, its diversity in the southern part of the globe has been shown to be much greater. Here we analyze the genomes of two Australasian lineages that are markedly distinct from P. rhodozyma. The two divergent lineages were investigated within a comprehensive phylogenomic study of representatives of the Cystofilobasidiales that supported the recognition of two novel Phaffia species, for which we propose the names of P. australis sp. nov. and P. tasmanica sp. nov. Comparative genomics and other analyses confirmed that the two new species have the typical Phaffia hallmark—the six genes necessary for the biosynthesis of astaxanthin could be retrieved from the draft genome sequences, and this carotenoid was detected in culture extracts. In addition, the organization of the mating-type (MAT) loci is similar to that of P. rhodozyma, with synteny throughout most regions. Moreover, cases of trans-specific polymorphism involving pheromone receptor genes and pheromone precursor proteins in the three Phaffia species, together with their shared homothallism, provide additional support for their classification in a single genus.

1. Introduction

The basidiomycetous yeast Phaffia rhodozyma, formerly known as Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous [1,2], is the only fungus known to produce astaxanthin [3], an economically relevant carotenoid [4]. Initially used solely as an ingredient in aquaculture feeds [5], astaxanthin applications have become diverse in the nutraceutical, cosmetics, food, and feed industries, due to its antioxidant activity together with UV-light protection and anti-inflammatory roles [6]. Although the majority of the commercially available astaxanthin is produced by chemical synthesis, environmental and food safety concerns are driving the development of economically viable natural sources of this carotenoid, involving genetic engineering of P. rhodozyma among other approaches [7,8,9].
Six genes are known to be involved in the synthesis of astaxanthin in P. rhodozyma, which starts in the mevalonate pathway that forms isopentenylpyrophosphate (IPP), the general precursor of all isoprenoids [10]. The transformation of IPP into β-carotene is carried out by four enzymes encoded by genes IDI, CRTE, CRTYB and CRTI, with the final conversion of β-carotene into astaxanthin being completed by an astaxanthin synthase (CrtS), which receives the necessary electrons for substrate oxidation from a cytochrome P450 reductase (CrtR) [10]. Although the production of β-carotene in P. rhodozyma occurs in a similar way to other carotenogenic fungi, it is the final step performed by CrtS that sets P. rhodozyma apart and allows for its unique ability to produce astaxanthin [11].
Currently, P. rhodozyma is the sole species known in the genus Phaffia. This species was originally found in association with exudates of deciduous trees, mostly birch (Betula), in Europe, North America, and Japan [1]. For more than three decades it was considered that this yeast existed only in the Northern Hemisphere-birch system, but in 2007 we found P. rhodozyma in South America in a new habitat: the stromata of Cyttaria spp., an ascomycetous biotrophic parasite of southern beech trees (Nothofagus spp.) [12]. Since Nothofagus and Cyttaria can also be found in Australasia, we investigated the existence of additional populations of P. rhodozyma in the Southern Hemisphere, in Queensland and Tasmania (Australia) and in New Zealand’s South Island [13]. This study led to the discovery of an unprecedented diversity of Phaffia lineages and indicated that the assortment of genotypes was driven by the type of ecological niche rather than by geography. For example, strains from South American and Australasian Nothofagus were found to be genetically related as were the strains from Betula from Europe, Asia, and North America [13]. Furthermore, two additional Australasian lineages appeared markedly distinct from P. rhodozyma. Here we present a comprehensive genome-based phylogenetic study of Phaffia and related genera in the Cystofilobasidiales, and we conclude that these two novel species belong to the Phaffia genus and formally describe them as P. australis sp. nov. and P. tasmanica sp. nov.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genome Sequencing and Assembly

Genomic DNA of Phaffia, Cystofilobasidium, and Krasilnikovozyma (Table 1) was extracted from cultures of single-cell derivatives and paired-end Illumina MiSeq genomic reads were obtained (2 × 300 cycles). For Cystofilobasidum spp., an additional short-insert size (~500 bp) library was prepared with a Nextera Kit and subsequently sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2500 system to generate 151-nt reads. Raw sequence data for the RIKEN genomes (Table 1, Nextera Mate-pair and TrueSeq DNA PCR-free libraries) were downloaded from the European Nucleotide Archive. All raw sequence reads were adapter-trimmed with Trimmomatic v. 0.39 [14]. TrueSeq data was also preprocessed with BBmerge v. 38.73 [15] that cuts adapter sequences and merges overlapping paired reads into single read sequences. Preprocessed reads of Cystofilobasidium spp. were assembled with SPAdes v. 3.11.1 [16], with parameter --careful, and k-mer sizes automatically selected based on read length. For Mrakia aquatica, Trichosporon pullulans, Udeniomyces megalosporus, and U. pyricola, preprocessed reads were assembled with the same software using two different combinations: (i) Nextera mate-pair reads with BBmerge-processed TruSeq reads and (ii) Nextera mate-pair reads with Trimmomatic-processed TruSeq reads. Resulting assemblies for each genome were assessed for quality with QUAST v. 5.0. [17], and the assemblies with the largest genome size and N50 value were retained. Preprocessed sequence reads of Tausonia pamirica were assembled into scaffolds using ABYSS v. 2.0.2 [18] with default parameters. ABYSS was run with multiple k (kmer) parameter values and the optimal value of k was assessed by inspecting the assembly contiguity statistics. Small contigs of less than 1 kb were discarded from all final assemblies. Ab initio prediction of protein-coding genes and annotation of all final assemblies were performed with AUGUSTUS v. 3.3.3 [19] using the default gene structure training set for Cryptococcus deneoformans.

2.2. Orthology Mapping, Genomic Diversity, and Phylogenetic Analyses

Orthology mapping was carried out using all-against-all BLASTP (NCBI Blast-2.2) searches and a Markov cluster algorithm (OrthoMCL v. 1.4; [20]) with an inflation factor (F) of 1.5, and a minimum pairwise sequence alignment coverage of 50% as implemented in the Get_Homologues package [21]. From this analysis, we retained all clusters that contained one single orthologous copy in all analyzed genomes to form a dataset for the phylogenetic analysis of single-copy core proteins. Protein sequences of each cluster were aligned with MAFFT v. 7.407 [22] using the G-INS-I method and default parameter values, trimmed with BMGE v. 1.12 [23] using the amino acid option, and finally concatenated into a single dataset. Alignment-free pairwise distances, Kr, that are based on the rate of substitutions between two unaligned sequences using the average shortest unique substring (shustring) [24] were calculated with GenomeTools [25]. For these calculations, a restrictive threshold of 0.3 was applied to discard inconsistent values between genome triads at high Kr levels [26]. The phylogenetic analysis was carried out with IQ-TREE v. 1.6.12 [27] using maximum-likelihood inference. Model choice was determined by ModelFinder [28] and branch support was estimated using fast bootstrap approximation with NNI optimization [29], both implemented in IQ-TREE. Phylogenies of the pheromone receptors and pheromone precursor proteins were inferred by NJ using the JTT matrix-based method as implemented in MEGA 5.1 [30] using 1000 bootstrap replicates. The corresponding proteins of C. deneoformans were used as outgroups for each of the phylogenies: AAN75624 (Ste3a), XP_570116 (Ste3α), AAG42766 (MFa1) and XP_570122 (MFα1).

2.3. Search for Relevant Genes

The search for genes pertaining to the astaxanthin synthesis pathway in the draft genomes of P. australis and P. tasmanica was performed by TBLASTN using the correspondent proteins from P. rhodozyma as the query. The same approach was used to search for mating type (MAT) genes in the new species. Putative orthologs were named according to the protein accession number of P. rhodozyma CBS 6938. Synteny conservation across species was assessed manually based on the predicted annotations and confirmed by high-scoring BLASTP hits in GenBank. The transmembrane regions in the pheromone receptor (PR) proteins were predicted by HMMTOP software [31]. For the deduced Hd1 and Hd2 proteins, homeodomain regions were determined using the InterPro server [32], while nuclear localization signals (NLS) were predicted using the SeqNLS server [33] with a 0.5 cutoff. Potential alpha-helices were predicted by Jpred4 [34], and searches for coiled-coil dimerization motifs were conducted using COILS [35] with a sliding window of 28, weighing option and probability ≥ 90% [36].
Predicted pheromone precursor proteins sequences from the three Phaffia species were aligned with ClustalW as implemented in BioEdit [37] in order to predict the cleavage site giving rise to the peptide moiety of the mature pheromone.

2.4. Phenotypic Characterization

The characterization of vegetative and sexual structures was carried out in YPD (yeast extract 1% w/v, peptone 2% w/v, glucose 2% w/v), and on YM agar (yeast extract 0.3% w/v, malt extract 0.3% w/v, peptone 0.3% w/v, glucose 1% w/v, agar 2% w/v), corn meal agar (Difco), and ribitol agar (ribitol 0.5% w/v and agar 2.5% w/v). Microscopic observations were made using a Leica DMR microscope equipped with differential interference contrast optics. Dissection of basidiospores was performed using a Zeiss Scope A1 Micromanipulator. Physiological and biochemical characteristics were examined according to standard protocols [38] and were performed in triplicate. The extraction of carotenoids was performed as previously reported [39], and the presence of astaxanthin was assessed by HPLC-PAD using standard techniques [40].

3. Results

3.1. The Divergent Australasian Lineages Belong to the Genus Phaffia

To assess the phylogenetic placement of the new lineages at the genus and species level, we used a concatenated alignment of the amino acid sequences of 485 single copy core genes. These sequences were retrieved from the draft genome sequences obtained in this study and from public databases (Table 1). Representatives of six genera of the Cystofilobasidiales were included in the phylogeny depicted in Figure 1 that confirmed that Cystofilobasidium and Phaffia are sister genera. The phylogeny also provided a robust topology for the remaining lineages within the order Cystofilobasidiales, that improves previous analyses of this group [41]. The clear demarcation at the genus level shown in Figure 1 suggests that the two new Australasian species are adequately described in the genus Phaffia, and also confirms that they represent new species. With respect to the level of nucleotide substitutions among multiple strains of P. australis, P. tasmanica and P. rhodozyma in the complete ITS sequence, a recognized DNA barcode for fungi [42,43], we measured 25–36 nucleotide substitutions in pairwise comparisons involving the three species. For example, in the sister genus Cystofilobasidium, the number of nucleotide substitutions recorded between the different species currently recognized in this genus ranged between 11 and 26, representing an equivalent level of divergence. Our previous results obtained using both housekeeping genes and genes encoding enzymes of the astaxanthin biosynthetic pathway also support the recognition of two new Phaffia species, as the divergence between the proposed three species clearly exceeds the documented divergence between the various populations of P. rhodozyma [13].
Draft genome sequences of representatives of Cystofilobasidium and Phaffia were also used to estimate alignment-free pairwise distances (Figure 2). Low divergence values (Kr) of less than 0.07 were obtained for comparisons involving three genomes of P. rhodozyma, whereas congeneric genome-wide divergence ranged between 0.18 and 0.21, both in Phaffia and in Cystofilobasidium.
Intergeneric divergence was always higher (0.3) than congeneric divergence. These values are in accordance with measurements made with the same approach in ascomycetous and basidiomycetous yeasts [44]. A sliding window analysis of the longest scaffold revealed relatively constant levels of divergence between P. rhodozyma and the two novel species (Figure S1), and a similar level of pairwise divergence between the Phaffia genomes was found using an alignment-free method (Figure S1). Taken together, these analyses support the view that the two Australasian lineages are genetically divergent from each other and from P. rhodozyma, and they show levels of interspecies genetic divergence similar to those observed among species of the sister genus Cystofilobasidium (Figure 2 and Figure S1).

3.2. Phenotypic Characterisation of P. australis sp. nov and P. tasmanica sp. nov.

Vegetative growth in both species occurred predominantly by budding (Figure 3b–c). True hyphae were not formed although pseudohyphae were produced on corn meal agar and ribitol agar. With respect to sexual reproduction, both P. australis and P. tasmanica formed basidia that exhibited many of the distinctive features previously reported for P. rhodozyma [2], namely a slender and filiform structure (Figure 3g,i–k) that originates directly from yeast cells (Figure 3f,h), grows aerially from the yeast colony (Figure 3a) and has terminal basidiospores (Figure 3g,i–k); hyphae were completely absent. However, some details of the reproductive cycle are unique to each of the different species. For instance, in P. rhodozyma, pedogamy (conjugation between the parent cell and its bud) precedes the formation of the basidium [2], whereas in P. australis, conjugation between two independent cells is the norm (Figure 3d–e), and in P. tasmanica most basidia arise from a single cell, with no apparent conjugation (Figure 3h). Pedogamy was also observed in both novel species but only rarely. Like in P. rhodozyma, the sexual stage of the two novel species is triggered by the presence of ribitol as a sole carbon source in the culture medium. Basidia produced by these two novel species are non-septate, slender, and form two to four basidiospores terminally on minute pegs (Figure 3i–k). By micromanipulation of basidiospores of P. australis and P. tasmanica, we observed that cultures derived from single basidiospores were able to complete the sexual life cycle, thus confirming that the new species are homothallic, like P. rhodozyma.
The standard physiological and biochemical characterization of the two novel species is shown in Table 2. The two new Phaffia species were able to ferment glucose and sucrose, an uncommon characteristic for basidiomycetous yeasts but a trait also present in P. rhodozyma. Additionally, P. tasmanica fermented raffinose, unlike the other two species. Phaffia australis differed from P. tasmanica and P. rhodozyma in its ability to grow on xylitol and ethylamine (Table 2). The inability to grow on D-xylose and D-glucitol were unique to P. tasmanica. Similarly to P. rhodozyma, the new species were able to grow at 25 °C but were unable to grow at 30 °C. Therefore, the phenotypic hallmarks of the genus Phaffia are the unique formation of basidia directly from yeast cells, a homothallic life cycle, and the ability to ferment glucose and other simple sugars.

3.3. Astaxanthin Production

Cultures of representative strains of the three species have a similar orange to salmon color that can vary in intensity, depending on the age of the culture and exposure to light, i.e., older cultures or those more exposed to light tend to become more pigmented. Previously, P. rhodozyma was the only yeast species known to produce astaxanthin. To ascertain whether this characteristic was also present in the new species, the ability of P. australis and P. tasmanica to produce this carotenoid was evaluated. Sequences of the six genes of P. rhodozyma involved in the biosynthetic pathway of astaxanthin (IDI, CRTI, CRTYB, CRTE, CRTR and CRTS) were used to query the genomes of the type strains of the new species. We employed TBLASTN and used the correspondent proteins from P. rhodozyma as queries (CAA75796, AAY33922, AAY33923, CAA75240, ABA43719, ACI43097). All six genes were readily retrieved from the two draft genome sequences. The genes appeared to encode functional enzymes, exhibiting 90–98% amino acid sequence identity to those of P. rhodozyma (Figure S2). Although genes encoding secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways are often clustered in fungi [45], the astaxanthin genes do not appear to be clustered in the genomes of the two new species and are instead scattered across different contigs (Table S1). This same pattern of gene organization has also been observed in P. rhodozyma [26]. The presence of astaxanthin in culture extracts of P. australis and P. tasmanica was confirmed by HPLC-PAD using P. rhodozyma CBS 7918 as a positive control.

3.4. Organization of MAT Loci

The same approach as above was used to search for mating type (MAT) genes in the new species, employing the P. rhodozyma query proteins CED85384 (STE3-1), CED85379 (STE3-2), CDZ96688 (HD1), and CDZ96689 (HD2). We detected MAT genes similar to those present in P. rhodozyma in the draft genomes of P. australis and P. tasmanica. Predicted amino acid sequences of the pheromone receptors, Ste3-1 and Ste3-2, revealed the characteristic seven transmembrane domains in both species, with the exception of Ste3-2 of P. australis for which eight transmembrane domains were predicted (Figure S3). The predicted amino acid sequences of the homeodomain transcription factors, Hd1 and Hd2 of P. australis, present features similar to the Hd1/Hd2 pair of P. rhodozyma, with a nuclear localization signal (NLS) present only in the Hd2 protein and coiled-coils present only in the C-terminal region of Hd1. For P. tasmanica, NLS were predicted in both proteins, while coiled-coils were only present in the C-terminal region of Hd1, as in the other Phaffia species [46] (Figure S4). The organization of the MAT loci of P. australis and P. tasmanica is similar to that of P. rhodozyma, with synteny maintained throughout the scaffolds containing the MAT regions, except for a large inversion that took place in P. tasmanica close to the PR locus (Figure 4).
Moreover, a phylogenetic analysis of pheromone receptors and pheromone precursor proteins from the three Phaffia species revealed trans-specific polymorphisms (Figure 5). This means that the STE3-1 (or MFA1) alleles of the different Phaffia species are more similar to each other than to the alternate STE3-2 (or MFA2) alleles present in the genome of each Phaffia species. Pheromone receptor alleles have been documented in various lineages of Basidiomycota [47] and they are usually deeply trans-specific, with alleles from distantly related species or even members of distinct Classes grouping in the same allelic clade [48]. Interestingly, the trans-specific polymorphism of Phaffia STE3 alleles appears to not be as deep as in other basidiomycete lineages (Figure 5) because both alleles are still more closely related to each other than to alternate alleles of the more distantly related species C. deneoformans. Therefore, we suggest the trans-specific polymorphism observed in Phaffia is comparatively recent and was initiated before the radiation of the Phaffia species but after the divergence of the Phaffia ancestor from the other Cystofilobasidiales lineages. This suggests that the two pheromone/receptor alleles in Phaffia may have a different evolutionary origin as compared to other basidiomycete pheromone/receptors [46]. Finally, comparative analysis of the pheromone precursor proteins of the three Phaffia species showed Mfa1 to be more conserved than Mfa2, especially Mfa2 of P. tasmanica (Figure 5c).

3.5. Taxonomy

3.5.1. Description of Phaffia australis sp. nov. M. David-Palma, D. Libkind, P. Gonçalves and J.P. Sampaio

Mycobank accession: MB 836706.
Whole genome data: PRJNA371751.
Genbank LSU and ITS sequences: KR108929 and JN637116, respectively.
Etymology: australis (Lat.), meaning southern and referring to Australia and New Zealand, the countries where this species was originally found.
After 3 days at 20 °C on YMA, cultures have an orange to salmon color and a butyrous texture. After 3 days at 20 °C on YPD, cells are ellipsoidal (4–8 × 8–16 μm) and proliferation is done by budding at the distal ends of the cell (Figure 3b). On corn meal agar or ribitol agar after two weeks at 18 °C, pseudohyphae can be present but true hyphae are not produced. Basidia can be observed on ribitol agar after incubation at 18 °C for four days. Cell-cell conjugation initiates the development of the sexual stage (Figure 3d). Basidia originate directly from one of the conjugated cells (Figure 3e–f) and are slender (2–3 × 50–80 μm) with a slight swelling at the apex. Ellipsoidal basidiospores (5–6 × 10–11 μm) range from two to six, are formed terminally in the basidium (Figure 3g) and germinate by budding. The physiological and biochemical profile is shown in Table 2, and the phylogenetic placement based on whole-genome data is shown is Figure 1.
The holotype (PYCC 6859H) is permanently maintained in a metabolically inactive state in the Portuguese Yeast Culture Collection, Caparica, Portugal; the type strain was deposited in the same collection (PYCC 6859T) and in the collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS 14095T), Utrecht, the Netherlands. The strain ZP 938 (PYCC 6859T) was isolated in November 2009 from leaves of Nothofagus mooreii collected in the Lamington National Park, Queensland, Australia.

3.5.2. Description of Phaffia tasmanica sp. nov. M. David-Palma, D. Libkind, P. Gonçalves and J.P. Sampaio

Mycobank accession: MB 836707.
Whole genome data: PRJNA371754.
Genbank LSU and ITS sequences: KT223097 and JN637120, respectively.
Etymology: tasmanica (Lat.), pertaining to Tasmania, the island where this species was originally found.
After 3 days at 20 °C on YMA, cultures have an orange to salmon color and a butyrous texture (Figure 3a). After 3 days at 20 °C on YPD, cells are ellipsoidal (4–6 × 7–9 μm) and proliferation is done by budding at the distal ends of the cell (Figure 3c). On corn meal agar or ribitol agar after two weeks at 18 °C, pseudohyphae can be present but true hyphae are not produced. Basidia form on ribitol agar after incubation at 18 °C for four days. Typically, basidia develop from single cells (Figure 3 h) and cell-cell conjugation does not occur. Basidia are slender (2–3 × 50–90 μm) with a slight swelling at the apex (Figure 3 i–k). The basidiospores are subglobose to ellipsoidal (2–3 × 5–8 μm), range from two to six, are formed terminally in the basidium (Figure 3g), and germinate by budding. The physiological and biochemical profile is shown in Table 2, and the phylogenetic placement based on whole-genome data is shown is Figure 1.
The holotype (PYCC 6858H) is permanently maintained in a metabolically inactive state in the Portuguese Yeast Culture Collection, Caparica, Portugal; the type strain was deposited in the same collection (PYCC 6858T) and in the collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS 14096T), Utrecht, the Netherlands. The strain ZP 875 (PYCC 6858T) was isolated in November 2009 from fruiting bodies of Cyttaria gunnii on Nothofagus cunninghamii in Mount Field National Park in Tasmania (Australia).

4. Concluding Remarks

The genus Phaffia represents a unique lineage of basidiomycetous yeasts that form basidia directly from yeast cells, lack hyphae throughout the life cycle, and produce astaxanthin, a carotenoid of biotechnological interest. Here, we expand the mapped diversity of the genus by adding to the single species know so far, P. rhodozyma, two novel taxa, P. australis and P. tasmanica. As a consequence, the phylogeography and the ecological range of the genus Phaffia is considerably expanded. Phaffia rhodozyma was originally discovered in the slimy exudates of Betula spp. and a few other deciduous trees in the Northern Hemisphere. This restricted view of Phaffia distribution and ecology started to change in 2007 when P. rhodozyma was found in temperate forests in South America, associated with the Cyttaria-Nothofagus system [12]. A subsequent investigation of Nothofagus forests in Australasia revealed not only the presence of P. rhodozyma, but also divergent lineages whose taxonomic position is clarified here [13]. Therefore, while the three species currently known in the genus Phaffia are present in the Southern hemisphere and associated with the Cyttaria- Nothofagus system, only one of these species, P. rhodozyma, is also found in the Northern hemisphere. Given that Australasia has the highest diversity and the greatest level of endemism, we suggested that the genus evolved originally in this region [13]. Moreover, the association with Cyttaria–Nothofagus seems to be an ancestral trait in the genus because all three known species were isolated from this niche. The data presently available suggest that while P. australis and P. tasmanica are endemic to Australasia, P. rhodozyma is cosmopolitan and present in Australasia, South America, and in the Holarctic region.
Based on the overall similarity of the PR and HD regions and the MAT genes of P. tasmanica and P. autralis to those of P. rhodozyma, and the fact that these two new species also reproduce through a homothallic sexual cycle, it seems reasonable to propose a common genetic basis for the homothallic behavior of the three species, which was likely present in their most recent common ancestor.
Our phylogenetic analysis included two genomes of P. rhodozyma. One of them (PYCC 6917 = JCM 9681 = CBS 7918) corresponds to the type strain of Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, the nomenclatural designation of the sexual stage of Phaffia rhodozyma, which was originally described as asexual [2]. Since the abolishment of the dual nomenclature system for fungi [49], the designations of asexual and sexual morphs have been merged into a single one, and P. rhodozyma was retained over X. dendrorhous [41]. However, given that the type strain of P. rhodozyma (PYCC 6914 = CBS 5905) has mixed ancestries at the population level, which was revealed by an enriched number of heterozygous sites in multi-locus sequence typing studies [12,13], this strain may be inappropriate for use as a reference genome of the species. In contrast, PYCC 6917 shows no mixed ancestry and is therefore much more suitable to be regarded as the reference genome of P. rhodozyma. Because it is not possible to change the type (strain) of a species according to the nomenclature rules, we suggest that PYCC 6917 should be informally regarded as the reference genome (and strain) of Phaffia rhodozyma.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/11/1651/s1, Table S1: Localization of the genes encoding enzymes of the astaxanthin biosynthetic pathway in the draft genomes of P. australis and P. tasmanica, Figure S1: (A) Sequence similarity between the new species Phaffia australis and P. tasmanica and P. rhodozyma along the longest scaffold (scaffold 52) of P. rhodozyma CBS 6938. The left scale represents the divergence measured by a sliding window approach to P. rhodozyma CBS 7918 (red), P. rhodozyma CRUB 1149 (blue), P. australis PYCC 6859 (yellow) and P. tasmanica PYCC 6858 (magenta). The mean divergence value for each strain is shown using the color-codes indicated above. The right Y scale represents the percentage of Ns in the reference sequence, which are indicated as grey bars (1.5% of the scaffold sequence corresponded to Ns). (B) Genomic sequence divergence using an alignment-free method. Heat map and clustering with pairwise distances (Kr values) between the draft genomes of P. rhodozyma CBS 7918, CRUB 1149 and CBS 6938, P. tasmanica PYCC 6858, P. australis PYCC 6859, Cystofilobasidium bisporidii PYCC 4415, Cy. macerans PYCC 8515, Cy. capitatum PYCC 4530 and Cy. ferigula PYCC 4410, Figure S2: Amino acid alignments of the proteins involved in the astaxanthin biosynthetic route in Phaffia spp., Figure S3: Predicted proteins of the pheromone receptor genes of P. australis and P. tasmanica. The transmembrane domains of each sequence are highlighted in blue, Figure S4: Predicted proteins of the homeodomain transcription factor genes of P. australis and P. tasmanica. The secondary organization is highlighted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L., P.G., J.P.S.; methodology, M.A.C., M.D.-P., N.B., P.H.B.; software, M.A.C., P.H.B.; investigation, D.L., M.D.-P., M.A.C., M.S., N.B., P.H.B.; resources, J.H., J.P.S.; writing—M.D.-P., J.P.S.; writing—review and editing, M.D.-P., M.A.C., J.H., J.P.S., P.G.; visualization, M.D.-P., M.A.C., P.H.B.; supervision, J.P.S.; project administration, J.P.S.; funding acquisition, J.H., J.P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the following grants: PTDC/BIA-MIC/30785/2017 and UIDB/04378/2020 (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal) and NIH/NIAID R37 MERIT Award AI39115-23 and NIH/NIAID R01 AI50113-16 to J.H (USA). J.H. also serves as co-director and fellow of CIFAR program Fungal Kingdom: Threats & Opportunities.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shelby Priest for the careful revision of the text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Miller, M.W.; Yoneyama, M.; Soneda, M. Phaffia, a new yeast genus in the Deuteromycotina (Blastomycetes). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1976, 26, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Golubev, W.I. Perfect state of Rhodomyces dendrorhous (Phaffia rhodozyma). Yeast 1995, 11, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alcaíno, J.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V. Carotenoid distribution in nature. In Carotenoids in Nature: Biosynthesis, Regulation and Function; Stange, C., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 3–33. ISBN 978-3-319-39126-7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Schmidt, I.; Schewe, H.; Gassel, S.; Jin, C.; Buckingham, J.; Humbelin, M.; Sandmann, G.; Schrader, J. Biotechnological production of astaxanthin with Phaffia rhodozyma/Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, 555–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Foss, P.; Storebakken, T.; Schiedt, K.; Liaaen-Jensen, S.; Austreng, E.; Streiff, K. Carotenoids in diets for salmonids. Aquaculture 1984, 41, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guerin, M.; Huntley, M.E.; Olaizola, M. Haematococcus astaxanthin: Applications for human health and nutrition. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Loto, I.; Gutierrez, M.S.; Barahona, S.; Sepulveda, D.; Martinez-Moya, P.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V.; Alcaino, J. Enhancement of carotenoid production by disrupting the C22-sterol desaturase gene (CYP61) in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gassel, S.; Breitenbach, J.; Sandmann, G. Genetic engineering of the complete carotenoid pathway towards enhanced astaxanthin formation in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous starting from a high-yield mutant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ledetzky, N.; Osawa, A.; Iki, K.; Pollmann, H.; Gassel, S.; Breitenbach, J.; Shindo, K.; Sandmann, G. Multiple transformation with the crtYB gene of the limiting enzyme increased carotenoid synthesis and generated novel derivatives in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 545, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barredo, J.L.; García-Estrada, C.; Kosalkova, K.; Barreiro, C. Biosynthesis of astaxanthin as a main carotenoid in the heterobasidiomycetous yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rodríguez-Sáiz, M.; De La Fuente, J.L.; Barredo, J.L. Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous for the industrial production of astaxanthin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Libkind, D.; Ruffini, A.; Van Broock, M.; Alves, L.; Sampaio, J.P. Biogeography, host specificity, and molecular phylogeny of the basidiomycetous yeast Phaffia rhodozyma and its sexual form, Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. David-Palma, M.; Libkind, D.; Sampaio, J.P. Global distribution, diversity hot spots and niche transitions of an astaxanthin-producing eukaryotic microbe. Mol. Ecol. 2014, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bushnell, B.; Rood, J.; Singer, E. BBMerge—Accurate paired shotgun read merging via overlap. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality Assessment Tool for Genome Assemblies. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/29/8/1072/228832 (accessed on 2 July 2020).
  18. Simpson, J.T.; Wong, K.; Jackman, S.D.; Schein, J.E.; Jones, S.J.M.; Birol, I. ABySS: A parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Stanke, M.; Waack, S. Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel—PubMed. Bioinformatics 2003, 19 (Suppl. 2), ii215–ii225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, L.; Stoeckert, C.J.; Roos, D.S. OrthoMCL: Identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2178–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Contreras-Moreira, B.; Vinuesa, P. GET_HOMOLOGUES, a versatile software package for scalable and robust microbial pangenome analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 7696–7701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Criscuolo, A.; Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): A new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Haubold, B.; Pfaffelhuber, P.; Domazet-Los˘o, M.; Wiehe, T. Estimating mutation distances from unaligned genomes. J. Comput. Biol. 2009, 16, 1487–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Gremme, G.; Steinbiss, S.; Kurtz, S. GenomeTools: A comprehensive software library for efficient processing of structured genome annotations. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2013, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bellora, N.; Moliné, M.; David-Palma, M.; Coelho, M.A.; Hittinger, C.T.; Sampaio, J.P.; Gonçalves, P.; Libkind, D. Comparative genomics provides new insights into the diversity, physiology, and sexuality of the only industrially exploited tremellomycete: Phaffia rhodozyma. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; Von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tusnady, G.E.; Simon, I. The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 849–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mitchell, A.; Chang, H.Y.; Daugherty, L.; Fraser, M.; Hunter, S.; Lopez, R.; McAnulla, C.; McMenamin, C.; Nuka, G.; Pesseat, S.; et al. The InterPro protein families database: The classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D213–D221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, J.; Hu, J. SeqNLS: Nuclear localization signal prediction based on frequent pattern mining and linear motif scoring. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Drozdetskiy, A.; Cole, C.; Procter, J.; Barton, G.J. JPred4: A protein secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W389–W394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Alva, V.; Nam, S.Z.; Soding, J.; Lupas, A.N. The MPI bioinformatics Toolkit as an integrative platform for advanced protein sequence and structure analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W410–W415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lupas, A.; Van Dyke, M.; Stock, J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 1991, 252, 1162–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kurtzman, C.P.; Fell, J.W.; Boekhout, T.; Robert, V. Methods for isolation, phenotypic characterization and maintenance of yeasts. In The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study; Kurtzman, C., Fell, J., Boekhout, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 87–110. ISBN 978-0-444-52149-1. [Google Scholar]
  39. Libkind, D.; Moliné, M.; García, V.; Fontenla, S.; Broock, M. Characterization of a novel South American population of the astaxanthin producing yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (Phaffia rhodozyma). Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Libkind, D.; Moliné, M.; Tognetti, C. Isolation and selection of new astaxanthin producing strains of Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. In Microbial Carotenoids from Fungi: Methods and Protocols; Barredo, J.-L., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 183–194. ISBN 978-1-61779-918-1. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, X.Z.; Wang, Q.M.; Göker, M.; Groenewald, M.; Kachalkin, A.V.; Lumbsch, H.T.; Millanes, A.M.; Wedin, M.; Yurkov, A.M.; Boekhout, T.; et al. Towards an integrated phylogenetic classification of the Tremellomycetes. Stud. Mycol. 2015, 81, 85–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Fell, J.W.; Boekhout, T.; Fonseca, A.; Scorzetti, G.; Statzell-Tallman, A. Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50 Pt 3, 1351–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hibbett, D.S.; Binder, M.; Bischoff, J.F.; Blackwell, M.; Cannon, P.F.; Eriksson, O.E.; Huhndorf, S.; James, T.; Kirk, P.M.; Lücking, R.; et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycol. Res. 2007, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Libkind, D.; Čadež, N.; Opulente, D.A.; Langdon, Q.K.; Rosa, C.A.; Sampaio, J.P.; Gonçalves, P.; Hittinger, C.T.; Lachance, M.A. Towards yeast taxogenomics: Lessons from novel species descriptions based on complete genome sequences. FEMS Yeast Res. 2020, 20, foaa042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rokas, A.; Mead, M.E.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Raja, H.A.; Oberlies, N.H. Biosynthetic gene clusters and the evolution of fungal chemodiversity. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020, 37, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. David-Palma, M.; Sampaio, J.P.; Gonçalves, P. Genetic dissection of sexual reproduction in a primary homothallic basidiomycete. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Coelho, M.A.; Bakkeren, G.; Sun, S.; Hood, M.E.; Giraud, T. Fungal Sex: The Basidiomycota. In The Fungal Kingdom; Heitman, J., Howlett, B.J., Crous, P.W., Stukenbrock, E.H., James, T., Gow, N.A.R., Eds.; American Society of Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; pp. 147–175. [Google Scholar]
  48. Devier, B.; Aguileta, G.; Hood, M.E.; Giraud, T. Ancient trans-specific polymorphism at pheromone receptor genes in basidiomycetes. Genetics 2009, 181, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. McNeill, J.; Barrie, F.; Buck, W.; Demoulin, V.; Greuter, W.; Al, E. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Vegetabile 154; A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2012; ISBN 978-3-87429-425-6. [Google Scholar]
Microorganisms 08 01651 g001 550
Figure 1. Genome-based phylogenetic placement of Phaffia australis and P. tasmanica within the Cystofilobasidiales. The phylogeny was inferred from a concatenated alignment of 485 amino acid sequences corresponding to single copy core genes from all taxa (including Cryptococcus deneoformans employed to root the tree), using the LG+F+I+G4 model of sequence evolution and the maximum likelihood method as implemented in IQ-TREE. The analysis includes representative species of six genera of the Cystofilobasidiales (C. cystofilobasidium, K. krasilnikovozyma, M. mrakia, P. phaffia, T. tausonia, and U. udeniomyces) with the two new Phaffia species depicted in bold. All branches have 100% bootstrap support (fast bootstrap with NNI optimization), and branch lengths correspond to the expected number of substitutions per site.
Figure 1. Genome-based phylogenetic placement of Phaffia australis and P. tasmanica within the Cystofilobasidiales. The phylogeny was inferred from a concatenated alignment of 485 amino acid sequences corresponding to single copy core genes from all taxa (including Cryptococcus deneoformans employed to root the tree), using the LG+F+I+G4 model of sequence evolution and the maximum likelihood method as implemented in IQ-TREE. The analysis includes representative species of six genera of the Cystofilobasidiales (C. cystofilobasidium, K. krasilnikovozyma, M. mrakia, P. phaffia, T. tausonia, and U. udeniomyces) with the two new Phaffia species depicted in bold. All branches have 100% bootstrap support (fast bootstrap with NNI optimization), and branch lengths correspond to the expected number of substitutions per site.
Microorganisms 08 01651 g001
Microorganisms 08 01651 g002 550
Figure 2. Pairwise divergence using the Kr alignment-free method between the three Phaffia (P.) species and comparison with four species of Cystofilobasidium (C.). Heat-map of divergence values (red, lowest divergence; pale yellow, highest divergence). The dendrogram on the left was based on Euclidean distances and average clustering.
Figure 2. Pairwise divergence using the Kr alignment-free method between the three Phaffia (P.) species and comparison with four species of Cystofilobasidium (C.). Heat-map of divergence values (red, lowest divergence; pale yellow, highest divergence). The dendrogram on the left was based on Euclidean distances and average clustering.
Microorganisms 08 01651 g002
Microorganisms 08 01651 g003 550
Figure 3. Salient micromorphological features of Phaffia australis sp. nov. and Phaffia tasmanica sp. nov. Orange-salmon colored colony of P. tasmanica PYCC 6947 with a whitish velvet-like margin of aerial basidia and basidiospores (a). Yeast cells of P. australis PYCC 6859T (b) and P. tasmanica PYCC 6858T (c) on YPD after 3 days at 20 °C. Cell-cell conjugation (d) and subsequent basidium formation (e–g) of P. australis PYCC 6859T. Early stage of basidium development from a single cell of P. tasmanica PYCC 6948 (h) and mature basidia with basidiospores (i–k) of PYCC 6858T. All stages of sexual development were studied on ribitol agar incubated at 18 °C and observations were conducted after 3–10 days. Scale bars correspond to 10 µm.
Figure 3. Salient micromorphological features of Phaffia australis sp. nov. and Phaffia tasmanica sp. nov. Orange-salmon colored colony of P. tasmanica PYCC 6947 with a whitish velvet-like margin of aerial basidia and basidiospores (a). Yeast cells of P. australis PYCC 6859T (b) and P. tasmanica PYCC 6858T (c) on YPD after 3 days at 20 °C. Cell-cell conjugation (d) and subsequent basidium formation (e–g) of P. australis PYCC 6859T. Early stage of basidium development from a single cell of P. tasmanica PYCC 6948 (h) and mature basidia with basidiospores (i–k) of PYCC 6858T. All stages of sexual development were studied on ribitol agar incubated at 18 °C and observations were conducted after 3–10 days. Scale bars correspond to 10 µm.
Microorganisms 08 01651 g003
Microorganisms 08 01651 g004 550
Figure 4. Organization of the mating-type (MAT) loci in the three Phaffia species. Scaffolds encompassing PR (a) and HD (b) genes in the different Phaffia species are represented. Genes are depicted as arrows indicating the direction of transcription and are identified by the protein accession number of their putative orthologs in P. rhodozyma CBS 6938. Mating-type genes, including pheromone receptor genes (STE3), pheromone precursor genes (MFA), and homeodomain transcription factor genes (HD1 and HD2) are color-coded, while other genes are depicted in white. The regions spanning the proposed HD and PR loci are highlighted in yellow. In P. tasmanica, the PR locus is located at the end of two scaffolds, which are possibly interrupted by transposable elements. Scaffolds ending with a dotted line indicate that the scaffold is only partially represented. Blocks of synteny with orthologs in the same or inverted orientation are depicted by blue or pink bars, respectively.
Figure 4. Organization of the mating-type (MAT) loci in the three Phaffia species. Scaffolds encompassing PR (a) and HD (b) genes in the different Phaffia species are represented. Genes are depicted as arrows indicating the direction of transcription and are identified by the protein accession number of their putative orthologs in P. rhodozyma CBS 6938. Mating-type genes, including pheromone receptor genes (STE3), pheromone precursor genes (MFA), and homeodomain transcription factor genes (HD1 and HD2) are color-coded, while other genes are depicted in white. The regions spanning the proposed HD and PR loci are highlighted in yellow. In P. tasmanica, the PR locus is located at the end of two scaffolds, which are possibly interrupted by transposable elements. Scaffolds ending with a dotted line indicate that the scaffold is only partially represented. Blocks of synteny with orthologs in the same or inverted orientation are depicted by blue or pink bars, respectively.
Microorganisms 08 01651 g004
Microorganisms 08 01651 g005 550
Figure 5. Trans-specific polymorphism of pheromone receptor genes in the genus Phaffia. Phylogeny of pheromone receptors (a) and pheromone precursor proteins (b) from all Phaffia species, and alignment of pheromone precursor proteins (c). Predicted mature pheromones are highlighted in grey with bold font and the C-terminal motif for posttranslational processing is underlined.
Figure 5. Trans-specific polymorphism of pheromone receptor genes in the genus Phaffia. Phylogeny of pheromone receptors (a) and pheromone precursor proteins (b) from all Phaffia species, and alignment of pheromone precursor proteins (c). Predicted mature pheromones are highlighted in grey with bold font and the C-terminal motif for posttranslational processing is underlined.
Microorganisms 08 01651 g005
Table
Table 1. List of draft genomes and correspondent cultures used in this work.
Table 1. List of draft genomes and correspondent cultures used in this work.
SpeciesSequenced StrainOther CollectionsGenome Data
(BioProject)		Origin
Cryptococcus deneoformansJEC21 PRJNA13856NCBI
Cystofilobasidium bisporidiiPYCC 5604CBS 6347PRJNA371778This study
Cystofilobasidium bisporidiiPYCC 4415TCBS 6346TPRJNA371780This study
Cystofilobasidium capitatumPYCC 4530CBS 7420PRJNA371774This study
Cystofilobasidium ferigulaPYCC 4410CBS 7201PRJNA371786This study
Cystofilobasidium maceransPYCC 8515CBS 6532PRJNA371809This study
Cystofilobasidium maceransPYCC 8654CBS 2425PRJNA371814This study
Krasilnikovozyma curviusculaPYCC 5836T PRJNA371818This study
Mrakia aquaticaJCM 1775T PRJDB3647RIKEN BioResource Center
Mrakia blollopisSK-4 PRJDB3253NCBI
Mrakia blollopisNwmf-AP1 RRJNA268263NCBI
Mrakia frigidaJCM 7857T PRJDB3713RIKEN BioResource Center
Mrakia frigidaATCC 22029T PRJNA334195JGI
Mrakia psychrophilaNN053900 PRJNA304674NCBI
Phaffia australisPYCC 6859TCBS 14095TPRJNA371751This study
Phaffia rhodozymaCBS 6938PYCC 6916PRJEB6925NCBI
Phaffia rhodozymaJCM 9681PYCC 6917PRJDB3716RIKEN BioResource Center
Phaffia tasmanicaPYCC 6858TCBS 14096TPRJNA371754This study
Tausonia pamiricaJCM 10408T PRJDB3689RIKEN BioResource Center
Tausonia pullulansJCM 9886T PRJDB3678RIKEN BioResource Center
Udeniomyces megalosporusJCM 5269T PRJDB3720RIKEN BioResource Center
Udeniomyces pyricolaJCM 2958T PRJDB3672RIKEN BioResource Center
Acronyms of culture collections: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, USA; CBS, Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures), Utrecht, the Netherlands; JCM, Japan Collection of Microorganisms, Riken Bioresource Research Center, Japan; PYCC, Portuguese Yeast Culture Collection, Caparica, Portugal.
Table
Table 2. Physiological characteristics of P. australis sp. nov. PYCC 6859T, PYCC 6943 and PYCC 6944, P. tasmanica sp. nov. PYCC6858T, PYCC 6947 and PYCC 6948, and comparison with P. rhodozyma CBS 7918T and CBS 5905 (+, positive; -, negative; D, delayed; V, variable; W, weak results).
Table 2. Physiological characteristics of P. australis sp. nov. PYCC 6859T, PYCC 6943 and PYCC 6944, P. tasmanica sp. nov. PYCC6858T, PYCC 6947 and PYCC 6948, and comparison with P. rhodozyma CBS 7918T and CBS 5905 (+, positive; -, negative; D, delayed; V, variable; W, weak results).
FermentationP. australisP. tasmanicaP. rhodozyma
D-Glucose+++
D-Galactose---
D-Xylose---
Sucrose+, W+D, -
Maltose--D, -
α,α-Trehalose--D, -
Melibiose---
Lactose---
Methyl-α-D-glucoside---
Cellobiose--D, -
Melezitose-+D, -
Raffinose-W-
Inulin---
Soluble Starch---
Assimilation of carbon compounds
D-Glucose+++
D-Galactose-D, W-
L-Sorbose--D, -
D-Glucosamine---
D-Ribose--D, -
D-Xylose+-+
L-Arabinose+++
D-Arabinose--D, -
L-Rhamnose--D, -
Sucrose+++
Maltose+++
α,α-Trehalose+++
Methyl-α-D-glucoside++D, -
Cellobiose+++
Salicin+++
Melibiose++-
Lactose---
Raffinose+++
Melezitose+++
Inulin---
Soluble Starch+++
Glycerol+++
Erythritol---
RibitolD-D, -
Xylitol+--
D-Glucitol+-D
D-Mannitol+++
Galactitol---
Inositol---
Glucono-δ-lactone+++
D-Gluconic acid+++
D-Glucuronic acid+w+, D
D,L-Lactic acid--V
Succinic acid+++
Citric acid+++
D-Tartaric acid---
m-Tartaric acid---
Saccharic acid---
Mucic acid---
Methanol---
Ethanol+++
Assimilation of nitrogen compounds
Nitrate---
Nitrite---
Ethylamine+--
L-Lysine+++
CadaverineWW+
Creatine---
Creatinine---
Other tests
Growth in vitamin-free medium---
Growth in the presence of 0.01% cycloheximide---
Growth in the presence of 0.1% cycloheximide---
Growth at 25 °C+++
Growth at 30 °C---
Formation of starch-like compounds+++
Hydrolysis of urea+++
Colour reaction with Diazonium Blue B+++
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

David-Palma, M.; Libkind, D.; Brito, P.H.; Silva, M.; Bellora, N.; Coelho, M.A.; Heitman, J.; Gonçalves, P.; Sampaio, J.P. The Untapped Australasian Diversity of Astaxanthin-Producing Yeasts with Biotechnological Potential—Phaffia australis sp. nov. and Phaffia tasmanica sp. nov. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111651

AMA Style

David-Palma M, Libkind D, Brito PH, Silva M, Bellora N, Coelho MA, Heitman J, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP. The Untapped Australasian Diversity of Astaxanthin-Producing Yeasts with Biotechnological Potential—Phaffia australis sp. nov. and Phaffia tasmanica sp. nov. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(11):1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111651

Chicago/Turabian Style

David-Palma, Márcia, Diego Libkind, Patrícia H. Brito, Margarida Silva, Nicolás Bellora, Marco A. Coelho, Joseph Heitman, Paula Gonçalves, and José Paulo Sampaio. 2020. "The Untapped Australasian Diversity of Astaxanthin-Producing Yeasts with Biotechnological Potential—Phaffia australis sp. nov. and Phaffia tasmanica sp. nov." Microorganisms 8, no. 11: 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111651

APA Style

David-Palma, M., Libkind, D., Brito, P. H., Silva, M., Bellora, N., Coelho, M. A., Heitman, J., Gonçalves, P., & Sampaio, J. P. (2020). The Untapped Australasian Diversity of Astaxanthin-Producing Yeasts with Biotechnological Potential—Phaffia australis sp. nov. and Phaffia tasmanica sp. nov. Microorganisms, 8(11), 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111651

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop