Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Sexually Divergent Host–Wolbachia Interaction Patterns in a Fig Wasp
Previous Article in Journal
A Murine Skin Infection Model Capable of Differentiating the Dermatopathology of Community-Associated MRSA Strain USA300 from Other MRSA Strains
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of an EPS Biosynthesis Gene Cluster of Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78 on Biofilm Formation and Nitrogen Fixation under Aerobic Conditions

Microorganisms 2021, 9(2), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020289
by Xiaojuan He 1, Qin Li 1, Nan Wang 2 and Sanfeng Chen 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2021, 9(2), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020289
Submission received: 15 January 2021 / Revised: 26 January 2021 / Accepted: 27 January 2021 / Published: 30 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Biofilm)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see my comments and suggestions in the pdf document. Thanks.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

 

I read and check your manuscript with much interest. Overall, yours is good, but I recommend you to revise/clarify me some points, so that your manuscript will attract valuable readers much more.

 

  • Please, explain why you formed biofilms in tube instead microtiter plates (Section 2.3).
  • Explain the importance of study the Paenibacillus in terms of biofilm formation and EPS biosynthesis. It was not clear for me. This information should appear clearer in the manuscript.
  • Explain the contribution of the results in terms of their application in different biotechnological areas.
  • In material and methods section, I think you can added information about the statistical analysis performed.
  • Line 58, It seems like you forgot a point after the “spp.”
  • Line, 51, 67, 207 you can change Paenibacillus polymyxa by P. polymyxa.
  • Line 129, you can change NH4Cl by NH4Cl.

 

Positive points:

  • Figures are very attractive, clean, clear with statistical analysis well represented.
  • The manuscript is well written with essential information.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop