The Status of Wildlife Damage Compensation in China
1
Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK
3
Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
4
Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(2), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14020292
Submission received: 19 December 2023
/
Revised: 5 January 2024
/
Accepted: 8 January 2024
/
Published: 17 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Wildlife)
Simple Summary
With the remarkable progress in wildlife conservation in China in recent years, the problem of human–wildlife conflict has notably increased. To appropriately resolve human–wildlife conflict and safeguard environmental justice, efficient wildlife damage compensation is crucial. This review attempts to compile information on the current state of wildlife damage compensation in China, describing the characteristics of wildlife damage and highlighting the necessity for compensation, regulation, and the management of wildlife damage compensation. We further compiled a list of nuisance species, and we exemplify detailed management practices in four case studies. Finally, we carefully evaluated the difficulties and challenges faced by China’s wildlife damage compensation schemes and provided recommendations for the future.
Abstract
The conservation management of natural ecosystems in China has significantly improved in recent decades, resulting in the effective protection of wildlife and the restoration of habitats. With the rapid growth in wildlife populations and corresponding range expansions, incidents of human–wildlife conflict have notably increased across China. However, only a few studies have paid adequate attention to wildlife damage management and compensation. In our review, we focus on the foremost mitigation measure to combat human–wildlife conflict, i.e., compensation for damage caused by wildlife. We conducted a questionnaire survey and an in-depth review of the literature across 19 Chinese provinces and autonomous regions, resulting in a total of 78 relevant sources. We first introduce the concept of wildlife damage compensation in China, followed by a review of Chinese legislation and policies regarding wildlife damage compensation. We compiled a comprehensive list of nuisance species, and we showcase four case studies in which we exemplarily describe the current situation of wildlife damage compensation. We reflect on difficulties and challenges such as delayed damage assessments or compensation quotas that do not correspond to current market prices. Since local legislation is often insufficient or completely absent, we make suggestions on how to improve existing policies and compensation mechanisms.
