Next Article in Journal
Patients’ Perspectives on the Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker-Led Intervention to Increase Chronic Kidney Disease Knowledge and Screening among Underserved Latine Adults: The CARE 2.0 Study
Previous Article in Journal
How Teachers’ Emotional Leadership Influences College Students’ Learning Engagement
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Behavioral Sciences
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/bs14090749
behavsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Difficulties among Teachers’ Emotional Regulation: Analysis for the Development of Student Well-Being in Chilean Schools

by
Gerardo Fuentes-Vilugrón
1,
Eduardo Sandoval-Obando
2,
Felipe Caamaño-Navarrete
3,4,
Carlos Arriagada-Hernández
3,4,
Paulo Etchegaray-Pezo
1,
Flavio Muñoz-Troncoso
5,*,
Isabel Cuadrado-Gordillo
6,
Pablo del Val Martín
7 and
Enrique Riquelme-Mella
8,*
1
Faculty of Education, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4780000, Chile
2
Escuela de Psicología, Instituto Iberoamericano de Desarrollo Sostenible, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4800916, Chile
3
Physical Education Career, Faculty of Education, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4780000, Chile
4
Grupo de Investigación Colaborativa para el Desarrollo Escolar (GICDE), Temuco 4780000, Chile
5
Faculty of Social Sciences and Arts, Universidad Mayor, Temuco 4780000, Chile
6
Department of Psychology and Anthropology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain
7
Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Observatorio Chileno de Educación Física y Deporte Escolar, Universidad Andres Bello, Las Condes, Santiago 7550000, Chile
8
Facultad de Educación, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco 4810399, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 749; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090749
Submission received: 12 July 2024 / Revised: 22 August 2024 / Accepted: 26 August 2024 / Published: 27 August 2024
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Introduction. Emotional regulation, a process that involves detecting and evaluating physiological signals in response to stressful events, is a crucial aspect of preparing students for school and ensuring teachers’ effectiveness, stress management, and job satisfaction. Method. This research, which adopted a quantitative approach, used a non-experimental comparative and cross-sectional design with a non-probabilistic sample by convenience. The study involved the participation of n = 1321 teachers (n = 125 preschool education; n = 645 primary education; n = 417 secondary education; n = 134 higher education). Results. The results revealed significant differences in the total scores of emotional regulation difficulty between teachers at the higher education level and primary and secondary school teachers, with the latter group showing higher levels of difficulty. Discussion. The findings suggest that the impact of emotional regulation difficulties affects professional performance, highlighting the importance of interventions aimed at improving teachers’ self-efficacy, resilience, and emotion regulation to reduce emotional exhaustion. Conclusion. From a practical point of view, our findings underline the importance of integrating emotional regulation training into pre-service teacher education and continuous teacher professional development programs. This could improve relational dynamics between students and teachers, fostering an environment conducive to teaching and learning processes.

1. Introduction

Historically, emotions have always played a role in all teaching and learning processes, mediating memories and giving meaning to the information processed by human beings [1]. These are crucial as they influence personal and others’ behaviors [2], impacting the socioemotional learning of teachers and students inside and outside the classroom [3]. This accounts for the importance of emotional regulation, which involves detecting and evaluating physiological signals before events that may or may not become stressful, leading to an emotional reaction [4,5]. The above strengthens the theoretical model proposed by Gross and Thompson, who state that emotional regulation is a goal-directed process that affects the intensity, duration, and type of emotion experienced [6,7]. In this sense, Gross and Thompson (2007) propose four phases of the emotional regulation process: (a) situation, as the way to choose or avoid activities based on the emotional impact that can be expected; (b) attention, which consists of identifying feelings according to the information to which we pay attention; (c) evaluation (cognitive change), which refers to the change in the way of thinking to change the way of feeling; and (d) response, which is the act of sharing and/or expressing emotion from an experiential, physiological, and/or behavioral perspective [8].
In the Chilean context, formal school-based instruction is a permanent process encompassing theoretical and intellectual aspects. It also aims to develop ethical, spiritual, values-based, artistic, physical, and emotional dimensions [9]. Emotional regulation processes have been studied in educational settings as they impact students’ engagement in learning experiences [10]. This teaching perspective helps learners to address learning challenges, making them better prepared to face academic and social obstacles [11,12]. The literature has already acknowledged and demonstrated how emotional components influence educational results at all academic levels [13]. For this reason, emotional regulation skills are fundamental for children’s school readiness and efficacy, stress, and job satisfaction [14,15].
In this regard, the teaching profession has become a demanding activity that involves constant emotional fluctuations [16]. However, there is an unspoken expectation that teachers should conceal negative emotions, such as frustration, sadness, and/or anger, and display emotions that are considered positive [16]. This aspect, combined with stress and excessive workload concerning available resources, can lead to emotional exhaustion [17,18]. This can negatively impact teaching performance, job satisfaction, emotional well-being, and student learning outcomes [19]. The close bond between teachers and students, as well as all interpersonal relationships within the school environment, mediates learners’ emotional regulation capacity [20,21,22]. In their study, Poulou and Denham demonstrated this perspective, emphasizing that teachers’ positive expressions of emotions significantly predicted students’ social and emotional competencies [23]. In essence, teachers need to understand and manage their emotional competencies to deploy them promptly when interacting with their students [24]. Equally, it has been demonstrated that emotion regulation can reduce emotional exhaustion syndromes in teachers. This means that the ability to recognize and regulate emotions and the capacity to make changes in the environment proactively can mediate the relationship between job strain and maladaptive emotional regulation practices [19].
Paradoxically, despite recognizing the importance of emotions in the Chilean educational context and in students’ learning processes, little work has been carried out in pre-service and in-service teacher education [25]. The teachers use two main strategies for emotional regulation: cognitive reappraisal, which involves consciously changing thoughts and behavior before the emotion fully emerges, and expressive suppression, which consists of regulating the outward expression of the emotion to prevent conflict [26,27,28,29,30]. However, the expressive suppression strategy is associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms, less success in mood recovery, and fewer interpersonal relationships [31]. In a context where knowledge of self-regulation strategies is lacking, along with the stress caused by teaching in a post-pandemic society, difficulties arise for emotional regulation. This construct is understood as the deficiency and/or inability to regulate the intensity and quality of emotions to generate an adequate emotional response and manage excitability, mood, and emotional overactivity [32].
Difficulties in emotional regulation can interfere with the well-being and functioning of individuals, which can manifest negatively in various ways: (a) biological aspects (substance abuse, self-harm, high blood pressure, increased heart rates, cancer, eating disorders, among others); (b) psychological and cognitive aspects (anxiety disorders, stress, depression, low self-esteem, among others); and (c) social aspects (attention deficit, aggressiveness, lack of empathy, ineffective communication, problems of coexistence, among others) [33,34]. Therefore, recognizing and understanding teachers’ emotional regulation strategies is crucial in educating children and young people. It could enable continuous improvement in the effectiveness and efficiency of teaching practices in the school context [35,36] and enhance relational dynamics between teachers and students. This element refers to the systematic interactions among educational agents in the classroom, which may lead to identifiable relational patterns [37,38]. Regulating emotional expression in teaching practices fosters an environment of emotional mimicry, where students automatically imitate each other’s nonverbal emotional behaviors [39]. Based on the above, the purpose of this research was to compare the levels of difficulties in the emotional regulation of Chilean teachers based on the educational level of the teaching institution that they worked in.

2. Materials and Methods

From a quantitative perspective, a non-experimental, comparative, and cross-sectional design was adopted. The researchers made this decision as they compared the emotional regulation difficulties of Chilean teachers who worked at the preschool, primary, secondary, and higher education levels.

2.1. Sample

The probabilistic convenience sample included 1321 male and female teachers (N = 266 men, 20.1% and N = 1055 women, 79.9%) who worked in Chile. The participants ranged in age from 22 to 71, and their years of work experience as teachers ranged from 0 to 50. As Table 1 shows, the highest participation was mainly among teachers working at the primary school level (N = 645, 48.8%), and the lowest participation was at the preschool level (N = 125, 9.46%).

2.2. Data Collection Instrument

The data collection instrument consisted of the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale, which was adapted to Spanish for the Chilean population (DERS-E). This instrument consists of 25 items on a Likert scale (1 = rarely, 5 = almost always); the higher the score, the greater the difficulty in regulating emotions. The DERS-E is divided into five factors (Table 2), while the internal consistency, according to Cronbach’s alpha, reached 0.92 for the total instrument and varies between 0.67 to 0.90 for each factor of the emotions scale [40,41].

2.3. Analysis Procedure

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Levene’s tests were used to evaluate the data’s normal distribution and the variances’ homogeneity. Continuous variables were expressed as means and standard deviation, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Differences in the comparison of means between the two groups were performed using the Student’s t-test and Mann–Whitney U test as appropriate. One-factor ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare the means of more than two groups. In addition, Gabriel’s post hoc test was applied to establish differences between groups.

3. Results

In the dimensions of emotional dysregulation by gender, there were statistically significant differences in the total score (p < 0.001), emotional rejection (p < 0.001), daily interference (p < 0.001), emotional inattention (p < 0.023), emotional dyscontrol (p < 0.003), and emotional confusion (p < 0.0.45). In addition, women presented higher levels of difficulties in regulating their emotions and in the dimensions of rejection, interference, inattention, lack of control, and confusion (Table 3).
In the dimensions of emotional regulation by educational level where the participating teachers worked, there were statistically significant differences in the total score (p = 0.024) and the daily interference factor (p = 0.003). There were no statistically significant differences in the dimensions of emotional rejection (p = 0.061), emotional inattention (p = 0.095), emotional lack of control (p = 0.178), and emotional confusion (p = 0.090). Likewise, elementary school teachers presented higher levels of difficulty in emotional regulation (total score) (Table 4).
After conducting post hoc analysis to determine differences between groups, it was found that there are significant differences in total scores between primary education and higher education teachers (p = 0.009). There are also statistically significant differences between secondary and higher education teachers (p = 0.025) (Table 5).
Regarding the daily interference dimension, significant differences were found between primary and higher education teachers (p = 0.029) (Table 5).

4. Discussion

An in-depth study of the strategies and relational dynamics linked to emotional regulation by Chilean teachers provides relevant and current elements of analysis concerning their socio-pedagogical implications. A statistically significant finding of our study is the existence of difficulties with emotional regulation manifested by Chilean teachers according to gender. Specifically, women exhibited higher levels of difficulties in regulating their emotions in the dimensions of rejection, interference, inattention, lack of control, and confusion. Studies report that levels of regulation and differential emotional intelligence vary based on gender, race, and specialty and identify that men generally exhibit significantly higher levels than women [42,43,44]. From the perspective of these studies, women only obtain a higher score in valuing others’ emotions. On the other hand, a study on the implications of the pandemic reported a greater presence of self-care behaviors in men than in women [45].
In contrast to the above, it is crucial to make visible the multiple challenges that arose with the onset of the pandemic in Chile and the world, in which education professionals felt emotionally overwhelmed when facing a series of practical problems related to online teaching [46,47]. In this context, it has been identified that using emotion-focused coping strategies, which are more commonly employed by women, such as seeking emotional support and openly expressing emotions, may be more effective than a simple problem-solving approach, which men use more commonly [48]. Thus, women may have adapted better and felt more capable of coping with prolonged periods of confinement, thus perceiving fewer emotional problems [49].
Even though emotional regulation is installed as a multidimensional phenomenon [50], there are several possible explanations for the gender differences in emotional regulation difficulties observed among Chilean teachers, such as cultural differences in the processes of socialization and internalization of gender roles [51], as society often expects women to be more affectionate and expressive with their emotions. This scenario may lead them to internalize negative emotions such as frustration or anger, which could hinder their ability to regulate them effectively. In this sense, it has been observed that women are socialized to be mostly caregivers of others rather than recipients of care [52]. Precisely because of this, women may be able to direct compassion toward others in times of stress but not toward themselves [53]. Simultaneously, teaching often involves emotionally challenging work, as teachers must project a calm and positive demeanor toward students [54]. Women might face a more significant emotional workload due to social expectations, which could lead to greater difficulties in and out of the school classroom. In addition, female teachers might have less access to support systems within the school environment that help them to manage their emotions promptly [55,56].
On the other hand, it could be inferred that the stressful situations accumulated in the post-pandemic society and the various challenges that teachers face in the classroom may differ according to gender [57]. In other words, female teachers might face more microaggressions or disrespectful behaviors from students or parents, which generates greater emotional stress [58,59]. Therefore, differential analysis of emotional regulation from a gender perspective installs complex questions about the underlying factors contributing to these differences [60]. Future research could delve deeper into social, economic, and geographic (rural/urban) expectations, historical–cultural influences, and teachers’ coping strategies to unravel the complexities of emotional regulation in diverse educational settings. Similarly, they have manifested that female teachers report elevated stress levels stemming from student behavior and thus have greater sensitivity to external student behavioral problems than male teachers [61,62]. This is a cause for concern, especially considering that female teachers tend to make up the majority of primary and secondary schools [63,64].
Similarly, teachers are often exposed to different types of student misbehavior daily. As a result, they accumulate intense negative emotions that lead to emotional exhaustion and burnout [13], reaffirming the importance of further studies to explore these specific experiences.
The results also showed significant variations in daily interference related to emotional regulation among teachers based on the educational level of their teaching institution. This finding suggests that the impact of emotional regulation difficulties extends beyond individual experiences and affects professional performance. Nevertheless, the results evidenced that primary education teachers reported higher levels of difficulty in emotional regulation compared to their higher education counterparts. These differences may be partly attributed to individuals becoming more proficient at regulating their emotions as they age [65]. This means that adults may be more inclined to regulate their emotions negatively, functionally modulating the potential impact of emotions experienced in their personal or professional context [66]. Likewise, such divergence is interesting as it underlines differential and heterogeneous challenges in teachers, depending on their different personal and professional development stages. Consequently, the results of this research partially coincide with those of a study with 1033 trainee teachers from various areas that found that the emotional intelligence levels of teachers with majors in Early Childhood Education and Science were higher than those of teachers with majors in Language, Social Studies, and Mathematics [67]. Precisely because of this, it could be pointed out that interventions aimed at improving emotional regulation skills should not only focus on individual coping strategies but also consider environmental factors and pedagogical–organizational support structures to mitigate interference and optimize the comprehensive well-being of teachers, regardless of the school level where they perform daily [68,69].
Similarly, other research highlights the importance of interventions to improve teachers’ self-efficacy, resilience, and emotion regulation to reduce emotional exhaustion [70,71]. In other words, teacher resilience mediates the association between emotion regulation and burnout [72,73,74]. On the other hand, studies have reported that engaging in potentially generative development could promote the emergence of resilient behaviors in teachers [75,76]. This practice may give them a clearer sense of purpose and greater flexibility in dealing with crisis processes, leading to higher subjective well-being. Undoubtedly, additional factors may also influence the relationship between these variables. This scenario highlights the complexity of the connection between these variables and emphasizes the necessity for further research in the field of educational sciences to identify other potential mediating factors.
The main limitation of the present study is its cross-sectional design. These variables should be measured in a longitudinal study to clarify the results better. Another limitation was that the measures of emotional regulation were obtained through a self-reported questionnaire, introducing a certain level of subjectivity in the results. Conversely, the study’s strength lies in the large sample size, which lends reliability to the results, and the diversity of participants from different regions of Chile.

5. Conclusions

In terms of the implications of the findings from this study for future research, several potential areas of exploration emerge. First, longitudinal studies that track the dynamics of emotional regulation among teachers over time could provide valuable information on the trajectory of these challenges and the effectiveness of intervention strategies in the short, medium, and long term [77]. This panorama would be enriched with mixed studies that delve into the lived experiences and coping mechanisms that teachers manifest in the classroom, systematizing the difficulties of emotional regulation for a comprehensive, evidence-based understanding.
This research highlights a clear challenge for Chilean education. Educational institutions should identify and understand the emotional burden that affects teachers’ work, promoting psychological support, peer support, and self-care opportunities. This approach would allow teachers to create healthy learning environments, maintain positive relationships with students, and respond effectively to classroom requirements. Furthermore, acknowledging the relevance of emotional regulation in education, particularly regarding the well-being of teachers and students, emphasizes the necessity of promoting ongoing training in this area. This would involve implementing professional development programs that enhance pre-service teacher education and providing in-service teachers with specific strategies and tools for managing their emotions and those of others.
From a practical point of view, these findings underscore the importance of integrating training in emotional regulation into initial teacher training and continuous in-service teacher development programs [77]. In this way, it could improve relational dynamics between students and teachers, fostering an environment conducive to teaching and learning processes. Similarly, organizational policies and support structures should prioritize teacher well-being, recognizing the impact of emotional regulation on professional satisfaction and retention rates. Finally, this research unveils the multifaceted nature of emotional regulation in Chilean teachers, highlighting gender disparities, educational level distinctions, and the implications of daily interference in pedagogical practice.

Author Contributions

G.F.-V., F.C.-N., C.A.-H. and E.S.-O. contributed to the conception, organization and oversight of the study, the drafting of the analysis plan, the writing of the original manuscript draft and the final approval of the version to be published. F.M.-T., P.d.V.M. and F.M.-T. contributed to critical manuscript revision and final approval of the version to be published. I.C.-G., F.M.-T., E.R.-M. and P.E.-P. contributed to data analysis and interpretation, critical manuscript revision and final approval of the version to be published. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the internal DIUA Project 203-2024 of the Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Chile.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Chile (protocol code Acta N° CEC 12-24, 4 June 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Riquelme, E.; Villarroel, V.; García, R.; Pérez, C.; Fuentes, G. Emotions of University Professors and Students in Times of Pandemic: An Analysis from the Perspective of Resilience in Chilean Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Halberstadt, A.G.; Oertwig, D.; Riquelme, E.H. Beliefs about children’s emotions in Chile. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Obando, E.S. Educación socioemocional, inclusiva, y concepto de educación. Rev. Boletín Redipe 2021, 10, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Price, C.J.; Hooven, C. Interoceptive awareness skills for emotion regulation: Theory and approach of mindful awareness in body-oriented therapy (MABT). Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Riquelme, I.; Hatem, S.M.; Sabater-Gárriz, Á.; Montoya, P. A multidimensional investigation of the relationship between skin-mediated somatosensory signals, emotion regulation and behavior problems in autistic children. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1227173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gross, J.J.; Thompson, R.A. Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gyurak, A.; Gross, J.J.; Etkin, A. Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework. Cogn. Emot. 2011, 25, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peña-Sarrionandia, A.; Mikolajczak, M.; Gross, J.J. Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: A meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Márquez, J.N.Y.; Fariña, N.M.; González, G.S.; Orellana, C.M. Análisis del PEI desde un enfoque radical e inclusivo: Consideraciones y sugerencias. Rev. De Inclusión Educ. Y Divers. (RIED) 2023, 1, 45–72. [Google Scholar]
  10. De Neve, D.; Bronstein, M.V.; Leroy, A.; Truyts, A.; Everaert, J. Emotion regulation in the classroom: A network approach to model relations among emotion regulation difficulties, engagement to learn, and relationships with peers and teachers. J. Youth Adolesc. 2023, 52, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sanchez-Ruiz, M.-J.; El Khoury, J. A model of academic, personality, and emotion-related predictors of university academic performance. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sanmartín, R.; Tapia-Peralta, S. La importancia de la educación emocional en la formación integral de los estudiantes. Recuper. El 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Camacho-Morles, J.; Slemp, G.R.; Pekrun, R.; Loderer, K.; Hou, H.; Oades, L.G. Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2021, 33, 1051–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hoffmann, J.D.; Brackett, M.A.; Bailey, C.S.; Willner, C.J. Teaching emotion regulation in schools: Translating research into practice with the RULER approach to social and emotional learning. Emotion 2020, 20, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bing, H.; Sadjadi, B.; Afzali, M.; Fathi, J. Self-efficacy and emotion regulation as predictors of teacher burnout among English as a foreign language teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 900417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Greenier, V.; Derakhshan, A.; Fathi, J. Emotion regulation and psychological well-being in teacher work engagement: A case of British and Iranian English language teachers. System 2021, 97, 102446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lesener, T.; Gusy, B.; Wolter, C. The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work Stress 2019, 33, 76–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mulyani, S.; Salameh, A.A.; Komariah, A.; Timoshin, A.; Hashim, N.A.A.N.; Fauziah, R.S.P.; Mulyaningsih, M.; Ahmad, I.; Ul din, S.M. Emotional regulation as a remedy for teacher burnout in special schools: Evaluating school climate, teacher’s work-life balance and children behavior. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 655850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fynes-Clinton, S.; Sherwell, C.; Ziaei, M.; York, A.; O’Connor, E.S.; Forrest, K.; Flynn, L.; Bower, J.; Reutens, D.; Carroll, A. Neural activation during emotional interference corresponds to emotion dysregulation in stressed teachers. NPJ Sci. Learn. 2022, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bayly, B.L.; Bierman, K.L. Profiles of dysregulation moderate the impact of preschoolteacher–student relationships on elementary school functioning. Early Educ. Dev. 2022, 33, 164–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vilugrón, G.A.F.; Saavedra, E.; Soler, N.S. Desregulación emocional en la formación inicial de profesores de Pedagogía en Educación Física. Retos Nuevas Tend. En Educ. Física Deporte Y Recreación 2021, 42, 575–583. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sáez, M.G.; Sepúlveda, E. Estrategias pedagógicas utilizadas en el contexto escolar para el desarrollo de una convivencia saludable. Rev. De Inclusión Educ. Y Divers. (RIED) 2023, 1, 73–98. [Google Scholar]
  23. Poulou, M.S.; Denham, S.A. Teachers’ emotional expressiveness and coping reactions to students’ emotions: Associations with students’ social-emotional competences and school adjustment. Early Educ. Dev. 2023, 34, 607–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Armstrong-Gallegos, S.; Sandoval-Obando, E. Inteligencia emocional y competencias para la atención a la diversidad en docentes chilenos durante la pandemia. Rev. De Cienc. Humanísticas Y Soc. (ReHuSo) 2023, 8, 17–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Herrera, P.B.; Abarca, J.M.A.; Jaña, C.M. Educación socioemocional: Discutiendo su implementación en el contexto educativo chileno. Rev. Saberes Educ. 2021, 6, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gross, J.J.; John, O.P. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. English, T.; Lee, I.A.; John, O.P.; Gross, J.J. Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals. Motiv. Emot. 2017, 41, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Siurana, J.N.; Vara, M.D.; Martí, A.C.; Rivera, R.M.B. Validación psicométrica del cuestionario de regulación emocional (ERQ-CA) en población adolescente española. Rev. De Psicol. Clínica Con Niños Y Adolesc. 2018, 5, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pineda, D.; Valiente, R.M.; Chorot, P.; Piqueras, J.A.; Sandín, B. Invarianza factorial y temporal del Cuestionario de Regulación Emocional (ERQ). Rev. De Psicopatología Y Psicol. Clínica 2018, 23, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Donker, M.H.; Erisman, M.C.; Van Gog, T.; Mainhard, T. Teachers’ emotional exhaustion: Associations with their typical use of and implicit attitudes toward emotion regulation strategies. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Navarro Saldaña, G.; Flores-Oyarzo, G.; Rivera Illanes, J. Relación entre autoestima y estrategias de regulación emocional en estudiantes con alta capacidad que participan de un programa de enriquecimiento extracurricular chileno. Calid. Educ. 2021, 55, 6–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paulus, F.W.; Ohmann, S.; Möhler, E.; Plener, P.; Popow, C. Emotional dysregulation in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. A narrative review. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 628252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vilugrón, G.A.F.; Hernández, R.I.L.; Merino, P.F. Dificultades para la regulación emocional del profesorado chileno en tiempos de SARS-CoV-2. Bordón Rev. De Pedagog. 2022, 74, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vilugrón, G.F.; Vallejos, E.S.; Mella, E.R.; Hernández, C.A.; Troncoso, F.M. Regulación emocional y cultura en contextos escolares. Eur. J. Educ. Psychol. 2023, 16, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mora Miranda, N.; Martínez-Otero Pérez, V.; Santander Trigo, S.; Gaeta González, M.L. Inteligencia emocional en la formación del profesorado de educación infantil y primaria. Perspect. Educ. 2022, 61, 53–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. García Cano, L.; Niño Murcia, S. La regulación emocional en docentes de educación en formación. Pensam. Educ. 2023, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Urbina, C.; Ipinza Villamán, R.; Gutiérrez-Fuentes, L. Prácticas relacionales profesor-estudiante y participación en el aula: Desafíos para la construcción de una convivencia democrática. Psicoperspectivas 2020, 19, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Santander Trigo, S.; Gaeta González, M.L.; Martínez-Otero Pérez, V. Impacto de la Regulación Emocional en el Aula: Un Estudio con Profesores Españoles; Universidad de Zaragoza, Asociación Universitaria de Formación del Profesorado (AUFOP): Zaragoza, Spain, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  39. Savina, E.; Fulton, C. Students’ and teachers’ emotions in the classroom: An ecological dynamic systems perspective. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2024, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Castro, N.; Suárez, X.; Barra, E. Relaciones de las dificultades de regulación emocional y los factores de personalidad con la satisfacción vital de estudiantes universitarios. Liberabit 2021, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guzmán-González, M.; Trabucco, C.; Urzúa, A.; Garrido, L.; Leiva, J. Validez y confiabilidad de la versión adaptada al español de la Escala de Dificultades de Regulación Emocional (DERS-E) en población chilena. Ter. Psicológica 2014, 32, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. DeCuir-Gunby, J.T.; Allen, E.M.; Boone, J.K. Examining pre-service teachers’ color-blind racial ideology, emotion regulation, and inflexibility with stigmatizing thoughts about race. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 60, 101836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stark, K.; Bettini, E. Teachers’ perceptions of emotional display rules in schools: A systematic review. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2021, 104, 103388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. López-Angulo, Y.; Mella-Norambuena, J.; Sáez-Delgado, F.; Portillo Peñuelas, S.A.; Reynoso González, O.U. Association between teachers’ resilience and emotional intelligence during the COVID-19 outbreak. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2022, 54, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bermejo-Martins, E.; Luis, E.O.; Fernández-Berrocal, P.; Martínez, M.; Sarrionandia, A. The role of emotional intelligence and self-care in the stress perception during COVID-19 outbreak: An intercultural moderated mediation analysis. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2021, 177, 110679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, L.E.; Asbury, K. ‘Like a rug had been pulled from under you’: The impact of COVID-19 on teachers in England during the first six weeks of the UK lockdown. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 90, 1062–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Schoeps, K.; Lacomba-Trejo, L.; Valero-Moreno, S.; del Rosario, C.; Montoya-Castilla, I. The impact of resilience and subjective well-being on teacher burnout during Covid-19 in Chile. Psicol. Educativa. Rev. Los Psicólogos Educ. 2023, 29, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Meléndez, J.C.; Mayordomo, T.; Sancho, P.; Tomás, J.M. Coping strategies: Gender differences and development throughout life span. Span. J. Psychol. 2012, 15, 1089–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Prime, H.; Wade, M.; Browne, D.T. Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. Psychol. 2020, 75, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Heydarnejad, T.; Zareian, G.; Ghaniabadi, S.; Adel, S.M.R. Measuring language teacher emotion regulation: Development and validation of the language teacher emotion regulation inventory at workplace (LTERI). Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 708888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Simon, R.W. Gender, emotions, and mental health in the United States: Patterns, explanations, and new directions. Soc. Ment. Health 2020, 10, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Taylor, S.E. Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 15, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yarnell, L.M.; Stafford, R.E.; Neff, K.D.; Reilly, E.D.; Knox, M.C.; Mullarkey, M. Meta-analysis of gender differences in self-compassion. Self Identity 2015, 14, 499–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moskowitz, S.; Dewaele, J.-M. Is teacher happiness contagious? A study of the link between perceptions of language teacher happiness and student attitudes. Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach. 2021, 15, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Donham, C.; Barron, H.A.; Alkhouri, J.S.; Changaran Kumarath, M.; Alejandro, W.; Menke, E.; Kranzfelder, P. I will teach you here or there, I will try to teach you anywhere: Perceived supports and barriers for emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2022, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zinsser, K.M.; Christensen, C.G.; Torres, L. She’s supporting them; who’s supporting her? Preschool center-level social-emotional supports and teacher well-being. J. Sch. Psychol. 2016, 59, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Levy, M.; Khoury-Kassabri, M. Female teachers’ coping styles with negative emotions in student aggression. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2022, 37, 1165–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Carroll, A.; Forrest, K.; Sanders-O’Connor, E.; Flynn, L.; Bower, J.M.; Fynes-Clinton, S.; York, A.; Ziaei, M. Teacher stress and burnout in Australia: Examining the role of intrapersonal and environmental factors. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2022, 25, 441–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Teles, R.; Valle, A.; Rodríguez, S.; Piñeiro, I.; Regueiro, B. Perceived stress and indicators of burnout in teachers at Portuguese higher education institutions (HEI). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sanabrias-Moreno, D.; Sánchez-Zafra, M.; Zagalaz-Sánchez, M.L.; Cachón-Zagalaz, J. Emotional intelligence, quality of life, and concern for gender perspective in future teachers. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Klassen, R.M.; Chiu, M.M. Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. J. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 102, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hopf, D.; Hatzichristou, C. Teacher gender-related influences in Greek schools. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 1999, 69, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Agyapong, B.; Obuobi-Donkor, G.; Burback, L.; Wei, Y. Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among teachers: A scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chang, M.-L. Toward a theoretical model to understand teacher emotions and teacher burnout in the context of student misbehavior: Appraisal, regulation and coping. Motiv. Emot. 2013, 37, 799–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Aldrup, K.; Carstensen, B.; Klusmann, U. The role of teachers’ emotion regulation in teaching effectiveness: A systematic review integrating four lines of research. Educ. Psychol. 2024, 59, 89–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Akyol, M.A.; Akdemir, E. Comparison of Emotional Intelligence Levels and Problem Solving Skills of Prospective Teachers According to Different Variables. World J. Educ. 2019, 9, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lozano-Pena, G.; Saez-Delgado, F.; Lopez-Angulo, Y.; Mella-Norambuena, J. Teachers’ social–emotional competence: History, concept, models, instruments, and recommendations for educational quality. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xiyun, S.; Fathi, J.; Shirbagi, N.; Mohammaddokht, F. A structural model of teacher self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and psychological wellbeing among English teachers. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 904151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Daniilidou, A.; Platsidou, M.; Gonida, E. Primary school teachers resilience: Association with teacher self-efficacy, burnout and stress. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 18, 549–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, S. The effect of teacher self-efficacy, teacher resilience, and emotion regulation on teacher burnout: A mediation model. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1185079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Colomeischi, A.A.; Ursu, A. Exploring the mediating role of emotion regulation on the relationship between teachers’ resilience and their perceived stress. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2023, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fathi, J.; Greenier, V.; Derakhshan, A. Self-efficacy, reflection, and burnout among Iranian EFL teachers: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Iran. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 2021, 9, 13–37. [Google Scholar]
  73. Richards, K.A.R.; Levesque-Bristol, C.; Templin, T.J.; Graber, K.C. The impact of resilience on role stressors and burnout in elementary and secondary teachers. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2016, 19, 511–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sandoval-Obando, E.E.; Pareja-Arellano, N.; Hernández-Mosqueira, C.; Riquelme-Brevis, H. What do we know about rural teaching identity? An exploratory study based on the generative-narrative approach. J. Pedagog. 2023, 14, 97–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sandoval-Obando, E.; Jimenez, M.S.R. Sentido de vida y generatividad en profesores rurales chilenos. Cauriensia. Rev. Anu. Cienc. Eclesiásticas 2023, 18, 805–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Braun, S.S.; Schonert-Reichl, K.A.; Roeser, R.W. Effects of teachers’ emotion regulation, burnout, and life satisfaction on student well-being. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2020, 69, 101151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gimbert, B.G.; Miller, D.; Herman, E.; Breedlove, M.; Molina, C.E. Social emotional learning in schools: The importance of educator competence. J. Res. Leadersh. Educ. 2023, 18, 3–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Distribution of the sample by level of education.
Table 1. Distribution of the sample by level of education.
Level of Education NumberPercentage
Preschool Education1259.46%
Primary Education64548.8%
Secondary Education41731.6%
Higher Education13410.1%
Total1321100%
Table 2. Factors of the DERS-E instrument.
Table 2. Factors of the DERS-E instrument.
FactorDefinition
Emotional rejectionNegative reaction to emotional responses from self and others.
Everyday interferenceEmotions interfere with effective action toward a goal when people experience a negative emotion.
Emotional inattentionDifficulties recognizing and being aware of one’s emotions.
Emotional dyscontrolProblems controlling one’s behavior when experiencing a high-intensity emotion.
Emotional confusionDifficulties in differentiating emotions as they are experienced.
Source: excerpted from [33].
Table 3. Emotional dysregulation by gender.
Table 3. Emotional dysregulation by gender.
DimensionGenderNMeanp
Total scoreMale26656.92
Female105563.46<0.001 *
Total132162.14
RejectionMale26616.48
Female105519.38<0.001 *
Total132118.8
InterferenceMale26611.64
Female105512.98<0.001 *
Total132112.71
InattentionMale26610.85
Female105511.540.023 *
Total132111.4
Lack of controlMale26611.66
Female105512.870.003 *
Total132112.63
ConfusionMale2666.29
Female10556.680.045 *
Total13216.6
Note: * the difference in means is significant at the 0.05 level.
Table 4. Comparison by level.
Table 4. Comparison by level.
DimensionsLevelnMeanStandard Deviationp
Total scorePreschool Education12562.2819.6030.024 *
Primary Education64562.9420.073
Secondary Education41762.5921.293
Higher Education13456.8118.508
RejectionTotal132162.1420.331
Preschool Education12518.788.170.061
Primary Education64519.138.385
Secondary Education41718.888.727
Higher Education13416.977.861
Total132118.88.438
InterferencePreschool Education12512.984.5710.003 *
Primary Education64512.914.389
Secondary Education41712.674.714
Higher Education13411.694.457
Total132112.714.527
InattentionPreschool Education12511.564.7010.095
Primary Education64511.594.465
Secondary Education41711.354.395
Higher Education13410.494.037
Total132111.404.431
Lack of controlPreschool Education12512.255.730.178
Primary Education64512.755.977
Secondary Education41712.896.103
Higher Education13411.585.225
Total132112.635.929
ConfusionPreschool Education1256.712.8190.090
Primary Education6456.572.762
Secondary Education4176.803.044
Higher Education1346.072.745
Total13216.602.862
Note: * the difference in means is significant at the 0.05 level.
Table 5. Post hoc between groups.
Table 5. Post hoc between groups.
Dependent Variable(I) NIV(J) NIVDifference in Means (I–J)Standard Errorp
Total scorePreschool EducationPrimary Education−0.6581.9811
Secondary Education−0.312.0671
Higher Education5.4742.5210.18
Primary EducationPreschool Education0.6581.9811
Secondary Education0.3481.2741
Higher Education6.132 *1.9250.009 *
Secondary EducationPreschool Education0.312.0671
Primary Education−0.3481.2741
Higher Education5.784 *2.0130.025 *
Higher EducationPreschool Education−5.4742.5210.18
Primary Education−6.132 *1.9250.009 *
Secondary Education−5.784 *2.0130.025 *
InterferencePreschool EducationPrimary Education0.0710.4421
Secondary Education0.3090.4611
Higher Education1.2820.5620.136
Primary EducationPreschool Education−0.0710.4421
Secondary Education0.2390.2841
Higher Education1.211 *0.4290.029 *
Secondary EducationPreschool Education−0.3090.4611
Primary Education−0.2390.2841
Higher Education0.9730.4490.182
Higher EducationPreschool Education−1.2820.5620.136
Primary Education−1.211 *0.4290.029 *
Secondary Education−0.9730.4490.182
Note: * the difference in means is significant at the 0.05 level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fuentes-Vilugrón, G.; Sandoval-Obando, E.; Caamaño-Navarrete, F.; Arriagada-Hernández, C.; Etchegaray-Pezo, P.; Muñoz-Troncoso, F.; Cuadrado-Gordillo, I.; del Val Martín, P.; Riquelme-Mella, E. Difficulties among Teachers’ Emotional Regulation: Analysis for the Development of Student Well-Being in Chilean Schools. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090749

AMA Style

Fuentes-Vilugrón G, Sandoval-Obando E, Caamaño-Navarrete F, Arriagada-Hernández C, Etchegaray-Pezo P, Muñoz-Troncoso F, Cuadrado-Gordillo I, del Val Martín P, Riquelme-Mella E. Difficulties among Teachers’ Emotional Regulation: Analysis for the Development of Student Well-Being in Chilean Schools. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(9):749. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090749

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fuentes-Vilugrón, Gerardo, Eduardo Sandoval-Obando, Felipe Caamaño-Navarrete, Carlos Arriagada-Hernández, Paulo Etchegaray-Pezo, Flavio Muñoz-Troncoso, Isabel Cuadrado-Gordillo, Pablo del Val Martín, and Enrique Riquelme-Mella. 2024. "Difficulties among Teachers’ Emotional Regulation: Analysis for the Development of Student Well-Being in Chilean Schools" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 9: 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090749

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop