Next Article in Journal
Deep Learning Architecture for Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
A Methodology for Determining the Rehabilitation Needs of Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
Mangrove Soil-Borne Trace Elements in Qi’ao Island: Implications for Understanding Terrestrial Input of Trace Elements into Part of the Pearl River Estuary
Previous Article in Special Issue
The S-Curve as a Tool for Planning and Controlling of Construction Process—Case Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Creep Assessment of the Cement Matrix of Self-Compacting Concrete Modified with the Addition of Nanoparticles Using the Indentation Method

Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(7), 2442; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072442
by Paweł Niewiadomski * and Damian Stefaniuk
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(7), 2442; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072442
Submission received: 2 March 2020 / Revised: 31 March 2020 / Accepted: 1 April 2020 / Published: 3 April 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Nothing To Say! Only... Good luck and best wishes!

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

No density of cement and aggregate has been provided. Usualal density of OPC and granite is 3.1kg/dm3 and 2.61-2.65 kg/dm3, respectively. Then

The sum of absolute volumes of all ingredients is less than 1000 dm3,
Please explain or correct the existing situation.

The article does not give any data on the properties of concrete.

Please explain why an extremely high amount of superplasticizer was used. The content is much higher than the maximum recommended. No chemical composition of the admixture is given.
Polymer admixtures should be used for SCCs.

The sample size (25x20mm) is too small when using 10mm aggregate. Test results may not be reliable.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper presents the experimental study on the creep of cement matrix modified with nanoparticles. Although the novelty of the paper is limited, the test results are well presented in the paper. Several detailed comments need to be addressed by the authors.

  1. The indentation method is a standard test method, which is not necessary to be introduced in the background literature review. Instead, studies on the creep of high performance concrete should be reviewed and presented in the paper.
  2. Why 4% of nanoparticle is selected in the mix design?
  3. Table 3, table number is wrong
  4. Please discuss in detail the differences between the presented test and the test reported in Ref [18]. Did you just repeat the test? and what cause the different findings between the present result and the others' results?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Although the authors have replied to the comments in the response, however, they are not fully reflected in the revised paper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop