Open Localization in 3D Package with TSV Daisy Chain Using Magnetic Field Imaging and High-Resolution Three-Dimensional X-ray Microscopy

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Review for MDPI Applied Siences

on manuscript

 

 Open Localization in 3D Package with TSV Daisy Chain using 2 Magnetic Field Imaging and High-Resolution 3 Three-Dimensional X-Ray Microscopy 4

Yuan Chen 1,2, Ping Lai 2, Hongzhong Huang 1,* , Peng Zhang 3 and Xiaoling Ling 2

 

The paper is very interesting and well written, but the English text needs some corrections.

The suggested corrections are indicated in the manuscript file directly. E.g. „um” is used instead of „μm”

The paper is suggested to be accepted after revision.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Most of the suggested corrections indicated in the manuscript file have been revised. The unrevised parts are explained as follows:

  (1) Line 96: “via” is correct. It means “Through Silicon Via (TSV)”.

  (2) Line 112: “die area” is correct. It means “chip before package”.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

There are some weaknesses through the manuscript which need improvement. Therefore, the submitted manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in this form, but it has a chance of acceptance after a minor revision. My comments and suggestions are as follows:

1- Abstract gives information on the main feature of the performed study, but some details about the obtained results must be added.

2- Authors must clarify necessity of the performed research. Aims and objectives of the study, must be clearly mentioned in introduction.

3- The literature study must be enriched. In this respect, authors must read and refer to the following papers: (a) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-00721-1 (b) https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.215.01.01

4- A real figure of specimen (figure 1) must be added.

5- It is necessary to put scale bar in the figures.

6- In its language layer, the manuscript should be considered for English language editing. There are sentences which have to be rewritten.

7- The conclusion must be more than just a summary of the manuscript. List of references must be updated based on the proposed papers. Please provide all changes by red color in the revised version.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper has been improved and corresponding modifications have been conducted. This version can be considered for publication.