Next Article in Journal
Framework for Malware Triggering Using Steganography
Next Article in Special Issue
Polymeric Nanoparticles—Tools in a Drug Delivery System in Selected Cancer Therapies
Previous Article in Journal
A Hybrid Approach for the Detection and Classification of Tomato Leaf Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chrysin-Loaded Microemulsion: Formulation Design, Evaluation and Antihyperalgesic Activity in Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Native and Human Serum Albumin-Bound Lysophosphatidic Acid Species and Their Effect on the Viability of Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro

1
Institute of Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
2
Orthosera Medical Zrt., 1123 Budapest, Hungary
3
Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
4
Institute for Sports and Health Sciences, University of Physical Education, 1123 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(16), 8183; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168183
Submission received: 18 July 2022 / Revised: 10 August 2022 / Accepted: 14 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Biomaterials and Drug Technology)

Abstract

:
Scaffolds can provide a healthy environment for cell attachment, differentiation, proliferation, and migration in vitro and in vivo. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a naturally occurring bioactive phospholipid that is present in the serum mainly bound to albumin. The present study aims to investigate the biocompatibility of LPA. It also aims to determine the effect of different LPA species on the proliferation and migration of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-dMSCs) for LPA and human serum albumin (HSA) containing bone scaffold development. The HSA-LPA complex formation was assessed using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The effect of 18:1, 18:2, or 16:0 LPA alone, or in combination with 4% HSA, on cell viability and proliferation was determined by XTT. The cell migration was examined in a wound healing assay. The changes in the FTIR spectra of LPA-HSA compositions, compared with HSA alone, indicate the complex formation between the components. Our study showed that 18:1, 18:2, and 16:0 LPA species had no cytotoxic effects up to 10 µM concentration. The different LPA species increased the proliferation of hBM-dMSCs in a dose-dependent manner when administered in the presence of HSA, without an effect on the migration of this cell type. These findings make the in vivo application of LPA-HSA complex promising for bone regeneration.

1. Introduction

In the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM), there are two main approaches toward clinical application in human subjects. The most convenient approach is developing a service that can be used for regenerative interventions, such as surgery-related techniques, cell-based therapies, gene therapy, and immunomodulation. These are usually in-house developed techniques that can enable, e.g., a clinician to implant a bone substitute for dental or weight-bearing surgeries. These techniques often require unique knowledge that is limited to persons skilled in this art. The other main approach of the development is to create a medical product that a healthcare professional can use throughout a surgical intervention. From the viewpoint of product classification, the three main types of applications that are suitable to become TERM products to enhance regeneration are: pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and tissue products [1].
Among the three regulatory categories, the most abundant field of tissue engineering and the scope of the present investigation is scaffold development. The chosen development follows the tissue product pathway, which encompasses the utilization of decellularized bone, with the intended use to be applied in the musculoskeletal system [2].
Our approach within regenerative medicine aims to replace and repair lost or damaged tissues by stimulating the natural regeneration process [3]. Mesenchymal stem cells are multi-lineage cells, capable of self-renewal and differentiation into a variety of cell types [4], which play key roles in tissue healing and regenerative medicine. Bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells are the most frequently used stem cells in cell therapy and tissue engineering [5]. Allogeneic bone substitutes, such as fresh-frozen, freeze-dried, or demineralized bone, are commonly used in bone replacement interventions [6]. According to previous studies, freeze-dried human serum albumin is able to improve the adherence and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells on bone allografts [7], and the serum albumin coating of the bone matrix showed stronger bone formation in vivo [8,9].
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a naturally occurring bioactive glycerophospholipid that is present in the systemic circulation in high nanomolar to low micromolar concentrations [10]. All LPA molecules consist of a glycerol backbone connected to a phosphate head group and ester-linked to an acyl chain [11]. The acyl chain length and degree of saturation of the formed LPA species are different. There are 16:0 > 18:0 > 20:4 > 18:1 > 18:2 LPAs that have been identified in resting and activated platelets. By contrast, in plasma, the rank order is 18:2 > 18:1 ≥ 18:0 > 16:0 > 20:4, whereas in serum the order is 20:4 > 18:2 > 16:0 ≥ 18:1 > 18:0 [12,13,14]. Extracellular LPA acts through at least six specific, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), LPAR1-6, and regulates various cellular signaling pathways. LPA has a crucial role in numerous biological responses, including cell adhesion, migration, proliferation [15], differentiation [16], vascular development, wound healing, apoptosis regulation, and immunity [17,18].
In common with long-chain fatty acids, LPA binds with a high affinity to serum albumin, the main extracellular LPA binding protein, at a molar ratio of approximately 3:1 [19,20]. LPA binds to the primary high-affinity fatty acid-binding sites on albumin [19]. Albumin is necessary for the biological activity of LPA, and albumin concentration is critical for the activation of LPA receptors in a receptor-type-specific manner [21].
Under physiological conditions, osteoblast-produced LPA is present in bone tissue, and under some pathophysiological conditions, such as fracture healing, bone cells are exposed to high levels of platelet-derived LPA [22]. In different bone cells, LPA induces various cellular effects, including proliferation, differentiation, survival, and migration [23]. Furthermore, LPA contributes to angiogenesis which is also a key step during the bone regeneration process [24]. Due to these effects, LPA is a promising candidate for applications in bone regeneration [25]. In recent years, some biomaterial studies have supported the potential of LPA for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mansell et al. found that albumin-bound LPA and calcitriol co-operate to promote osteoblast maturation on titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces [26] and improve human osteoblastogenesis [16]. A study reported by Bosetti et al. indicates that LPA and 1α,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3-enriched injectable scaffold can fasten bone fragments, leading to their apposition and new bone formation [27]. Furthermore, Binder et al. showed that physically entrapped LPA containing alginate hydrogel enhanced human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell survival in vivo [28].
The very first criterion of any scaffold for tissue engineering is that it must be biocompatible [29]. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the biocompatibility of LPA and to determine the effect of the most abundant, albumin-bound 16:0, 18:1, and 18:2 LPA species on the proliferation and migration of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture and Materials

Human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-dMSCs) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). The hBM-dMSCs were seeded in T75 TC- treated culture flasks and maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2, 95% humidified air incubator in the following stem cell medium: Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 4.5 g/L glucose and L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; EuroClone, Pero, Italy), 1% Penicillin–streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 0.75 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The culture medium was replaced three times a week. Cells with five to eight passages were used in the present study. In addition, 18:1 (oleoyl) and 18:2 (linoleoyl) LPA were purchased from Echelon Biosciences (Salt Lake City, UT, USA), and 16:0 (palmitoyl) LPA was purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). For stock solutions, the lipids were dissolved in methanol, dried under nitrogen gas, and reconstituted in water immediately before use.

2.2. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

FTIR spectra of HSA-bound LPA species were compared with native HSA. Infrared measurements were performed with a Bruker Vertex 80v (Bruker Corp., Billerica, MA, USA) spectrometer, equipped with a high-sensitivity mercury–cadmium–telluride detector and a single reflection diamond ATR accessory. We collected 128 scans at a 2 cm−1 resolution at the spectra wavelength range of 4000–400 cm−1. Further, 18:1, 18:2, or 16:0 LPA stock solutions of 1 mM concentration were mounted and surface-dried. A complex formation was initiated by mixing HSA and LPA with a peptide-to-lipid ratio of ~1:3 using concentrations of 300 µM and 1 mM for the HSA and the lipid, respectively. HSA- and LPA-containing solutions were mixed immediately before use.

2.3. Assessment of Cell Proliferation

The hBM-dMSCs were seeded on 96-well plates at 10,000 cells/well in 200 µL stem cell medium and allowed to attach for 24 h. After attachment, the stem cell medium was changed to serum-free medium with or without 4% (w/v) fatty-acid-free human serum albumin (HSA, Seracare, Milford, MA, USA) and the cells were cultured in the new medium overnight. Then the cells were treated with either 18:1, 18:2 or 16:0 LPA (0.1-0.3-1-3-10 µM) for 24 h. After treatment, the cell proliferation was measured using Cell Proliferation Kit II (XTT; Roche, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell proliferation is expressed as a percentage of the data of the HSA or native control group.

2.4. Wound Healing Assay

The hBM-dMSCs were allowed to grow on 24-well plates in 500 µL stem cell medium until they reached a confluent monolayer. The stem cell medium was changed to serum-free medium with or without 4% HSA, and the cells were incubated overnight. A cell-free zone was created across the cell monolayer with a sterile plastic micropipette tip in each well. After washing with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), the cells were treated with 18:1, 18:2, or 16:0 LPA (1-3-10 µM) alone or in combination with HSA. Cell migration was examined for 24 h with live cell imaging using a Nikon Eclipse Ti2 microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The images were analyzed after 0, 12, and 24 h of treatment, and the wound area was calculated by tracing the cell-free area in captured images using Nikon NIS-Elements Analysis Software (v.5.19, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The migration rate is expressed as the percentage of area reduction.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as mean ± SEM. The normal distribution of datasets was verified with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. If the normal distribution was confirmed, data are presented as the arithmetic mean and standard error, and the p-values were determined by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. If data are not normally distributed, data are presented as the median and interquartile range, and the statistical significance was determined by a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons. Statistical analysis and graph plotting were performed using GraphPad Prism software (v.6.0; GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), and p < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Assessment of Albumin–LPA Complex Formation with FTIR

The FTIR measurement results are shown in Figure 1, where structure-related chemical changes are demonstrated. The absorbances were normalized to the 2916 cm−1 peak in the case of LPA species, and the spectra were vertically shifted for a better understanding and to prevent overlapping. Figure 1A shows the FTIR spectra of native 18:2, 18:1, and 16:0 LPA species, whereas the spectra of HSA and HSA-bound 18:2, 18:1, and 16:0 LPA are shown in Figure 1B. These absorbances were normalized to the absorbance peak at 1648 cm−1.
In the case of the FTIR spectra of LPA species, the main absorbances were characteristic for the CH2 groups, the C=O groups, C-O bonds, and P-O-C bonds. In the case of HSA, the two characteristic bonds were the amide I and amide II absorption bands.

3.2. Effects of LPA Species on hBM-dMSCs Proliferation

XTT measurements were performed to investigate the possible cytotoxicity and to evaluate the effects of 18:1, 18:2, and 16:0 LPA on the proliferation of hBM-dMSCs. The cells were treated with increasing concentrations of phospholipids alone or in combination with HSA. After 24 h of treatment, none of the three LPA species showed cytotoxic effects up to 10 µM concentration. 18:1 LPA in 1, 3, and 10 µM concentrations significantly increased cell proliferation compared with the control group, but solely when administered in the presence of HSA (Figure 2A). In addition, 18:2 LPA significantly enhanced the proliferation of hBM-dMSCs in combination with HSA in 1, 3, and 10 µM and when examined alone in 3 and 10 µM concentrations (Figure 2B). A significant elevation in the cell proliferation was caused by 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 µM 16:0 LPA treatment, exclusively in combination with HSA (Figure 2C). Interestingly, among the examined three LPA species, only 18:2 LPA in 3 and 10 µM concentrations significantly increased cell proliferation when administered without HSA (Figure 2B).

3.3. The Effect of LPA Species on the Migration of hBM-dMSCs

Thereafter, we investigated whether 18:1, 18:2, or 16:0 LPA influenced the migration of the hBM-dMSCs, in a wound healing assay (Figure 3). The initial scratch area did not differ significantly in the treatment groups. The cells did not completely fill the gaps after 24 h of treatment. However, none of the three LPA species significantly enhanced cell migration, neither 12 nor 24 h after treatment, compared with the control group. There was also no significant difference between the HSA-bound LPA and the native LPA-treated groups (Figure 4). HSA-bound 16:0 LPA in a 10 µM concentration significantly improved the migration of the cells after 12 h, compared with a 1 µM concentration, the effect of which was not observable after 48 h of treatment (Figure 4C).

4. Discussion

The IR spectra were assessed for all three LPA derivatives. To enable this, only the characteristic functional groups were measured, and no interference occurred. Fatty acid-free HSA was used; thus it did not contain any complex-forming molecules. The LPA was solubilized in methanol and water to avoid any secondary binding and to ensure the purity of the reagents for spectroscopic purposes. The stretching of the CH2 groups is visible in the 2916–2926 cm−1 range and around 2850 cm−1. The deformation vibrations occur at 1467 cm−1 [30], and at 1736 cm−1 C=O stretching is visible [31]. The absorbance at 1266 cm−1 has been described as the peak of the PO2 asymmetric stretching vibration. However, this absorption is more profound in the spectrum of 18:2 LPA but should also appear in the spectra of 18:1 and 16:0 derivatives. Alternatively, this band can result from the CHα rocking, which is visible in the case of double bonds, and which is likely to be more intense in the case of 18:2 LPA, due to the two double bonds [32]. The purity of LPA 18:1 and 18:2 is in the 90 % range; thus, it may also be an acyl isomer impurity. The P-O-C and C-O bonds appear at 1062 cm−1 and 1179 cm−1, respectively [33]. Both CH2 stretching absorbances shifted towards higher wavenumbers in the case of LPA derivatives, with an 18-carbon-atom acyl chain length compared with the 16-carbon-atom acyl chain length LPA. The increased CH2 stretching frequencies indicate the higher disorder of the chains caused by the presence of double bonds in the acyl chains. The LPA derivatives are known to form complexes with HSA [19] in the 1:3 HSA:LPA ratio. Thus, the formed complexes were measured with the use of FTIR to investigate whether absorbance shifting occurred. HSA peaks dominate in the spectrum compared with the LPA peaks, which is presumably due to the significant difference in the molecular weights of the components. The two main characteristic bands for albumin are the amide I and II bands at 1648 cm−1, and at 1537 cm−1, respectively [34,35]. According to our evaluation, there was a small spectral shift of the amide I band in presence of LPA. The spectral shift was 1 cm−1 in the case of bound 18:1 LPA, and 3 cm−1 in the case of 18:2 and 16:0 LPA variants. These variations indicate a subtle change in the secondary structure, while preserving the overall alpha-helical nature of the protein. A similar shift was observed in the case of the amide II band. These spectral changes in the amide bands might indicate the binding of LPA to HSA.
Earlier, Chen et al. showed that LPA protects hBM-dMSCs against hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in vitro, indicating that LPA is a potent survival factor for hBM-dMSCs in bone repair applications [36]. In addition, LPA was observed to promote H2O2-induced autophagy [37], the effect of which was shown to play important roles in cell survival [38]. These findings make LPA a promising candidate to improve the viability and proliferation of hBM-MSCs during bone healing. Our cell viability measurement data demonstrate that 18:1, 18:2 and 16:0 LPA species are non-toxic for hBM-dMSCs up to 10 µM concentration. Although there is evidence for the advantages of using LPA in bone regenerative medicine [26,27], there are still some challenges with the in vivo application of LPA. LPA is easily degraded in vivo by lipid phosphate phosphatases [39]; thus, LPA requires a carrier that allows the successful delivery of the lipid. In our experiments, all the three tested LPA species improved the proliferation of hBM-dMSCs, the effect of which was more pronounced when administered in the presence of HSA. This finding supports the assumption that HSA might serve as an ideal carrier for LPA in bone regenerative applications. Further, 18:1 and 16:0 LPA species did not significantly improve the cell proliferation without HSA. However, interestingly, this effect appeared in the case of 18:2 LPA in 3 and 10 µM concentrations. The regulated signaling pathway during this LPA effect is not yet evaluated. However it is possible that these LPA species need to be transported to their receptors for signaling pathway activation. The proliferative effect of LPA seemed to be dose-dependent. The highest increments in cell proliferation were shown in 18:2 LPA in 3 and 10 µM and 16:0 LPA in 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 µM concentrations.
LPA is known to mediate the migration of various cell types [40,41], which might be connection to the experienced, LPA-enhanced proliferation of the hBM-dMSCs. In a previous research article by Song et al., LPA induced the migration of hBM-dMSCs [42]. Thus, as our next step, we investigated whether LPA in the presence or absence of HSA affects the migration of hBM-dMSCs. However, no significant increase was observed. Hence, it seems that, in our case, the viability-enhancing effect of LPA is not directly proportional to the migration in the case of hBM-dMSCs.

5. Conclusions

During our experiments, the main goal was to investigate the potential effect of LPA species on the viability of hBM-dMSCs, in vitro. The experiments included the toxicity profile of various concentrations of 18:1, 18:2 and 16:0 LPA species alone or in combination with HSA to investigate if the addition of LPA is beneficial for the attachment, proliferation, and migration of hBM-dMSCs. The complex formation between HSA and LPA was also analyzed with the use of IR spectroscopy. With these experiments, we aimed to find out if there is any difference in the spectra of the formed complexes compared with the base materials that could be visualized with IR spectroscopy. Thus, the characteristic peaks were compared in order to determine if any shifting of the absorbance wavelength of the characteristic peaks occurs. We found small spectral shifts of the amide I and II bands of HSA in the presence of LPA, indicating subtle changes in the secondary structure of the HSA due to the binding of LPA. The effect of LPA was also evaluated in vitro, with the use of XTT and migration assay in hBM-dMSCs. We found that LPA enhances the viability of hBM-dMSCs alone, the effect of which is more pronounced when administered in combination with HSA. In summary, in the present study, we have demonstrated that LPA is suitable for increasing cell viability alone and in combination with HSA in vitro, which may be a useful supplementation in TERM-related applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M., I.H. and É.R.; methodology, A.M., I.H., J.P., A.H. and B.B.; investigation, A.M., I.H., J.P. and L.S.; data curation, A.M. and I.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, I.H., É.R.; visualization, A.M. and I.H.; supervision, I.H. and É.R.; funding acquisition, Z.B. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Prepared with the professional support of the Doctoral Student Scholarship Program of the Co-operative Doctoral Program of the Ministry of Innovation and Technology financed from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, KDP-2020. This research was also funded by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office, TKP2021-EGA-25, TKP2021-EGA-21, 2020-1.1.6-JÖVŐ-2021-00010, 2020-1.1.6-JÖVŐ-2021-00013, OTKA K-125174, PD-132851, K-135683, and K-139230 grants and by the Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities in Hungary, within the framework of the Molecular Biology thematic program of the Semmelweis University, with support from the EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009 grant. The Central Library of Semmelweis University also kindly provided funds for open access publication fees.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of EÜIG (29152-3/2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to OrthoSera Medical Zrt., and the Department of Materials Science and Technology, University of Győr for the research support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frey, B.M.; Zeisberger, S.M.; Hoerstrup, S.P. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine-New Initiatives for Individual Treatment Offers. Transfus. Med. Hemother. 2016, 43, 318–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hinsenkamp, A.; Benyó, Z.; Hornyák, I. Overview of Tissue Engineering Patent Strategies and Patents from 2010 to 2020, Including Outcomes. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2022, 28, 626–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gardner, R.L. Stem cells and regenerative medicine: Principles, prospects and problems. C. R. Biol. 2007, 330, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bianco, P.; Robey, P.G.; Simmons, P.J. Mesenchymal stem cells: Revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem. Cell 2008, 2, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fu, X.; Liu, G.; Halim, A.; Ju, Y.; Luo, Q.; Song, A.G. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migration and Tissue Repair. Cells 2019, 8, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Holzmann, P.; Niculescu-Morzsa, E.; Zwickl, H.; Halbwirth, F.; Pichler, M.; Matzner, M.; Gottsauner-Wolf, F.; Nehrer, S. Investigation of bone allografts representing different steps of the bone bank procedure using the CAM-model. Altex 2010, 27, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weszl, M.; Skaliczki, G.; Cselenyák, A.; Kiss, L.; Major, T.; Schandl, K.; Bognár, E.; Stadler, G.; Peterbauer, A.; Csönge, L.; et al. Freeze-dried human serum albumin improves the adherence and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells on mineralized human bone allografts. J. Orthop. Res. 2012, 30, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Horváthy, D.B.; Vácz, G.; Szabó, T.; Szigyártó, I.C.; Toró, I.; Vámos, B.; Hornyák, I.; Renner, K.; Klára, T.; Szabó, B.T.; et al. Serum albumin coating of demineralized bone matrix results in stronger new bone formation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2016, 104, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Horváthy, D.B.; Schandl, K.; Schwarz, C.M.; Renner, K.; Hornyák, I.; Szabó, B.T.; Niculescu-Morzsa, E.; Nehrer, S.; Dobó-Nagy, C.; Doros, A.; et al. Serum albumin-coated bone allograft (BoneAlbumin) results in faster bone formation and mechanically stronger bone in aging rats. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2019, 13, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moolenaar, W.H. Lysophosphatidic acid, a multifunctional phospholipid messenger. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 12949–12952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yung, Y.C.; Stoddard, N.C.; Chun, J. LPA receptor signaling: Pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. J. Lipid Res. 2014, 55, 1192–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aoki, J. Mechanisms of lysophosphatidic acid production. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004, 15, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aikawa, S.; Hashimoto, T.; Kano, K.; Aoki, J. Lysophosphatidic acid as a lipid mediator with multiple biological actions. J. Biochem. 2015, 157, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sano, T.; Baker, D.; Virag, T.; Wada, A.; Yatomi, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Igarashi, Y.; Tigyi, G. Multiple mechanisms linked to platelet activation result in lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate generation in blood. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 21197–21206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, Y.B.; Kharode, Y.; Bodine, P.V.; Yaworsky, P.J.; Robinson, J.A.; Billiard, J. LPA induces osteoblast differentiation through interplay of two receptors: LPA1 and LPA4. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 109, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mansell, J.P.; Nowghani, M.; Pabbruwe, M.; Paterson, I.C.; Smith, A.J.; Blom, A.W. Lysophosphatidic acid and calcitriol co-operate to promote human osteoblastogenesis: Requirement of albumin-bound LPA. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2011, 95, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.F.; Li, R.S.; Samuel, S.B.; Cueto, R.; Li, X.Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.F. Lysophospholipids and their G protein-coupled receptors in atherosclerosis. Front. Biosci. 2016, 21, 70–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, C.; Ochoa, L.N.; Kagan, A.; Chai, H.; Liang, Z.; Lin, P.H.; Yao, Q. Lysophosphatidic acid causes endothelial dysfunction in porcine coronary arteries and human coronary artery endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 2012, 222, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thumser, A.E.; Voysey, J.E.; Wilton, D.C. The binding of lysophospholipids to rat liver fatty acid-binding protein and albumin. Biochem. J. 1994, 301 Pt 3, 801–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Michalczyk, A.; Budkowska, M.; Dołęgowska, B.; Chlubek, D.; Safranow, K. Lysophosphatidic acid plasma concentrations in healthy subjects: Circadian rhythm and associations with demographic, anthropometric and biochemical parameters. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hama, K.; Bandoh, K.; Kakehi, Y.; Aoki, J.; Arai, H. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors are activated differentially by biological fluids: Possible role of LPA-binding proteins in activation of LPA receptors. FEBS Lett. 2002, 523, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Karagiosis, S.A.; Karin, N.J. Lysophosphatidic acid induces osteocyte dendrite outgrowth. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 357, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yu, Z.L.; Jiao, B.F.; Li, Z.B. Lysophosphatidic Acid Analogue rather than Lysophosphatidic Acid Promoted the Bone Formation In Vivo. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7537630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, Y.; Ramakrishnan, D.P.; Ren, B. Regulation of angiogenesis by phospholipid lysophosphatidic acid. Front. Biosci. 2013, 18, 852–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, X.; Ma, Y.; Su, N.; Shen, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H. Lysophosphatidic acid: Its role in bone cell biology and potential for use in bone regeneration. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2019, 143, 106335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mansell, J.P.; Barbour, M.; Moore, C.; Nowghani, M.; Pabbruwe, M.; Sjostrom, T.; Blom, A.W. The synergistic effects of lysophosphatidic acid receptor agonists and calcitriol on MG63 osteoblast maturation at titanium and hydroxyapatite surfaces. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bosetti, M.; Borrone, A.; Leigheb, M.; Shastri, V.P.; Cannas, M. (*) Injectable Graft Substitute Active on Bone Tissue Regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A 2017, 23, 1413–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Binder, B.Y.; Williams, P.A.; Silva, E.A.; Leach, J.K. Lysophosphatidic Acid and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate: A Concise Review of Biological Function and Applications for Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2015, 21, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Brien, F.J. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Estrela-Lopis, I.; Brezesinski, G.; Möhwald, H. Dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine/phospholipase D interactions investigated with polarization-modulated infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Villé, H.; Maes, G.; De Schrijver, R.; Spincemaille, G.; Rombouts, G.; Geers, R. Determination of phospholipid content of intramuscular fat by Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy. Meat Sci. 1995, 41, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Movasaghi, Z.; Rehman, S.; ur Rehman, D.I. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy of Biological Tissues. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2008, 43, 134–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nzai, J.M.; Proctor, A. Determination of phospholipids in vegetable oil by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1998, 75, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alhazmi, H.A. FT-IR Spectroscopy for the Identification of Binding Sites and Measurements of the Binding Interactions of Important Metal Ions with Bovine Serum Albumin. Sci. Pharm. 2019, 87, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hinsenkamp, A.; Ézsiás, B.; Pál, É.; Hricisák, L.; Fülöp, Á.; Besztercei, B.; Somkuti, J.; Smeller, L.; Pinke, B.; Kardos, D.; et al. Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Gels with Blood-Derived Protein Components for Soft Tissue Regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A 2021, 27, 806–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, J.; Baydoun, A.R.; Xu, R.; Deng, L.; Liu, X.; Zhu, W.; Shi, L.; Cong, X.; Hu, S.; Chen, X. Lysophosphatidic acid protects mesenchymal stem cells against hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.-Y.; Fan, X.-S.; Cai, L.; Liu, S.; Cong, X.-F.; Chen, X. Lysophosphatidic acid rescues bone mesenchymal stem cells from hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis. Apoptosis 2015, 20, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baehrecke, E.H. Autophagy: Dual roles in life and death? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Salous, A.K.; Panchatcharam, M.; Sunkara, M.; Mueller, P.; Dong, A.; Wang, Y.; Graf, G.A.; Smyth, S.S.; Morris, A.J. Mechanism of rapid elimination of lysophosphatidic acid and related lipids from the circulation of mice. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2775–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jans, R.; Mottram, L.; Johnson, D.L.; Brown, A.M.; Sikkink, S.; Ross, K.; Reynolds, N.J. Lysophosphatidic acid promotes cell migration through STIM1- and Orai1-mediated Ca2+(i) mobilization and NFAT2 activation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, E.K.; Yun, S.J.; Do, K.H.; Kim, M.S.; Cho, M.; Suh, D.-S.; Kim, C.D.; Kim, J.H.; Birnbaum, M.J.; Bae, S.S. Lysophosphatidic acid induces cell migration through the selective activation of Akt1. Exp. Mol. Med. 2008, 40, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Song, H.Y.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, M.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, I.H.; Shin, S.H.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, J.H. Lysophosphatidic acid mediates migration of human mesenchymal stem cells stimulated by synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1801, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of native and HSA-bound LPA species and native HSA. (A) Native 16:0 LPA is shown at the bottom, 18:1 in the middle, and 18:2 at the top of the image. (B) The bottom line shows the FTIR spectra of native HSA and, in a vertical sequence, HSA-bound 16:0, 18:1, and 18:2 LPA species are shown.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of native and HSA-bound LPA species and native HSA. (A) Native 16:0 LPA is shown at the bottom, 18:1 in the middle, and 18:2 at the top of the image. (B) The bottom line shows the FTIR spectra of native HSA and, in a vertical sequence, HSA-bound 16:0, 18:1, and 18:2 LPA species are shown.
Applsci 12 08183 g001aApplsci 12 08183 g001b
Figure 2. Relative cell proliferation after 18:1 (A), 18:2 (B) and 16:0 (C) LPA treatment in combination with HSA (4% FFA HSA, white columns) or alone (native, grey columns). (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. control (0 µM LPA), ### p < 0.001, #### p < 0.0001, n = 4 in each group, two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test). Data are presented as % of control and mean ± SEM.
Figure 2. Relative cell proliferation after 18:1 (A), 18:2 (B) and 16:0 (C) LPA treatment in combination with HSA (4% FFA HSA, white columns) or alone (native, grey columns). (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. control (0 µM LPA), ### p < 0.001, #### p < 0.0001, n = 4 in each group, two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test). Data are presented as % of control and mean ± SEM.
Applsci 12 08183 g002
Figure 3. Representative bright-field images of the in vitro wound healing assay. (A) The “wound” was created by a line scratch across the hBM-dMSCs monolayer. Images were analyzed after (B) 12 and (C) 24 h of treatment. The images were taken in 10× magnification, and the scale bar represents 200 µm.
Figure 3. Representative bright-field images of the in vitro wound healing assay. (A) The “wound” was created by a line scratch across the hBM-dMSCs monolayer. Images were analyzed after (B) 12 and (C) 24 h of treatment. The images were taken in 10× magnification, and the scale bar represents 200 µm.
Applsci 12 08183 g003
Figure 4. Scratch area reduction (%) after treatment with (A) 18:1, (B) 18:2 and (C) 16:0 LPA species for 12 and 24 h. hBM-dMSCs were treated with different LPA species in 1 µM, 3 µM, and 10 µM concentrations alone or in combination with HSA (* p < 0.05, n = 3, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test). Data are presented as the median and interquartile range. The migration rate is expressed as the percentage of area reduction.
Figure 4. Scratch area reduction (%) after treatment with (A) 18:1, (B) 18:2 and (C) 16:0 LPA species for 12 and 24 h. hBM-dMSCs were treated with different LPA species in 1 µM, 3 µM, and 10 µM concentrations alone or in combination with HSA (* p < 0.05, n = 3, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test). Data are presented as the median and interquartile range. The migration rate is expressed as the percentage of area reduction.
Applsci 12 08183 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Majer, A.; Pesthy, J.; Besztercei, B.; Hinsenkamp, A.; Smeller, L.; Lacza, Z.; Benyó, Z.; Ruisanchez, É.; Hornyák, I. Characterization of Native and Human Serum Albumin-Bound Lysophosphatidic Acid Species and Their Effect on the Viability of Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8183. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168183

AMA Style

Majer A, Pesthy J, Besztercei B, Hinsenkamp A, Smeller L, Lacza Z, Benyó Z, Ruisanchez É, Hornyák I. Characterization of Native and Human Serum Albumin-Bound Lysophosphatidic Acid Species and Their Effect on the Viability of Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(16):8183. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Majer, Aliz, Julianna Pesthy, Balázs Besztercei, Adél Hinsenkamp, László Smeller, Zsombor Lacza, Zoltán Benyó, Éva Ruisanchez, and István Hornyák. 2022. "Characterization of Native and Human Serum Albumin-Bound Lysophosphatidic Acid Species and Their Effect on the Viability of Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro" Applied Sciences 12, no. 16: 8183. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168183

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop