Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Literature Review on Fake News in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Can AI Propose a Solution?
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study on Longitudinal Motion Scenario Design for Verification of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Autonomous Driving Systems
Previous Article in Journal
High-Precision Numerical Research on Flow and Structure Noise of Underwater Vehicle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cooperative Roundabout Control Strategy for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A New HEV Power Distribution Algorithm Using Nonlinear Programming

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(24), 12724; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412724
by Jooin Lee 1 and Hyeongcheol Lee 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(24), 12724; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412724
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 3 December 2022 / Accepted: 8 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I would suggest using the algorithm at an concretely empirical study

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

The article is very interesting from the perspective that it deals with, however, it would be interesting to see more literature related to the research topic, that is, the new HEV power distribution algorithm using nonlinear programming. It is important for the discussion of the proposal made by the authors.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report

In the manuscript, the authors proposed a nonlinear programming-based ECMS to improve the fuel efficiency of HEVs. The proposed NLP-ECMS allows for accurate calculation of the reference SOC trajectory with a relatively short calculation time making it a step toward real-time applications with limited computational resources.

The manuscript is well-written in my opinion. My comments are as the following:

1.  in table 3. the authors use the sum of error to reflect the accuracy of the obtained reference SOC trajectory for each case. The sum of error is a good measure in general but usually does not consider when different parameters weigh differently. Could the authors elaborate more on the weights associated with different parameters in the reference SOC trajectory?

2. The authors compare the results from NLP-ECMS with the results from DP which is used as an offline optimization algorithm producing a global optimal solution. Since the author is proposing an online optimization algorithm, it would be of greater significance if the authors could include a comparison of the performance of the NLP-ECMS with other state-of-the-art online optimization approaches, such as particle swarm optimization or neural networks-based methods.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I believe the experimental results will illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the algorithm.

Back to TopTop