Next Article in Journal
A Rapid Verification System for Automatic Emergency Braking Control Algorithm of Passenger Car
Next Article in Special Issue
A Radiation-Hardened Triple Modular Redundancy Design Based on Spin-Transfer Torque Magnetic Tunnel Junction Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Highway Alignment Optimization Considering Rollover Stability Based on Two-Dimensional Point Collision Dynamics
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Non-Magnetic Circulator Based on a Time-Varying Phase Modulator

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(1), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010512
by Xiangjian Jia and Yanfeng Jiang *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(1), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010512
Submission received: 20 November 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Circuit Design in Post-Moore Era)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper considers a circulator device for communication systems, based on time-varying phase modulation. This is a well-written and interesting paper, describing a new concept of circulator. In my opinion, it could be accepted for publication in Applied Sciences.

My only comment is related to the signals of Ctr1 and Ctr2 appearing in figures 4 and 5, which meaning is not so obvious. I wonder if they could be improved and/or simplified.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor,

In this paper, the authors introduced a Non-Magnetic Circulator Based on Time-Varying Phase Modulator. However, its innovation is not outstanding enough. In addition, there are only theoretical derivations and simulations in the manuscript. Due to the lack of experimental verification, the simulation results are unconvincing. Please see below for detailed comments.

1.       In this paper, simulation test is carried out, but experiment is not carried out. I mean, the experiment should be carried out.

2.       What’s the main novelty of this manuscript?

3.       The authors should compare the proposed scheme with other technology in introduction.

4.       I think the whole paper needs to remove typos and grammatical errors.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop