Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Railway Network Safety by Reproducing Wheel–Rail Electrical Contact on a Laboratory Scale
Next Article in Special Issue
Review of Mechanisms and Suppression Methods for Low-Frequency Pressure Fluctuations in Open-Jet Wind Tunnels
Previous Article in Journal
The Pulsed Electric Field Treatment Effect on Drying Kinetics and Chosen Quality Aspects of Freeze-Dried Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) and Yellow Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Larvae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physics-Based Swab and Surge Simulations and the Machine Learning Modeling of Field Telemetry Swab Datasets

Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(18), 10252; https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810252
Submission received: 13 July 2023 / Revised: 22 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 13 September 2023

Abstract

Drilling operations are the major cost factor for the oil industry. Appropriately designed operations are essential for successful drilling. Optimized drilling operations also enhance drilling performance and reduce drilling costs. This is achieved by increasing the bit life (minimizing premature bit wear), drilling more quickly, which reduces drilling time, and also reducing tripping operations. This paper is presented in two parts. The first part compares the parametric physics-based swab and surge simulation results obtained from the Bingham plastic, power law, and Robertson–Stiff models. The aim is to show how the model’s predictions deviate from each other. Two 80:20 oil/water ratio (OWR) oil-based drilling fluids and two 90:10 OWR oil-based drilling fluids, 1.96 sg and 2.0 sg, were considered in vertical and deviated wells. Analysis of the simulation results revealed that the deviations depend on the drilling fluid’s physical and rheological parameters as well as the well trajectory. Moreover, the model’s predictions were inconsistent. Data-driven machine learning (ML) modeling is the focus of the second section. Data-driven modeling was performed using both software-generated datasets and field datasets. The results show that the random forest regressor (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), long short-term memory (LSTM), LightGBM, XGBoost, and multivariate regression models predicted the training and test datasets with higher R-squared and minimum mean square error values. Deploying the ML model in real-time applications and the planning phase would lead to potential applications of artificial intelligence for well planning and optimization processes.
Keywords: swab; surge; simulation; machine learning modeling; oil-based drilling fluids swab; surge; simulation; machine learning modeling; oil-based drilling fluids

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohammad, A.; Belayneh, M.; Davidrajuh, R. Physics-Based Swab and Surge Simulations and the Machine Learning Modeling of Field Telemetry Swab Datasets. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10252. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810252

AMA Style

Mohammad A, Belayneh M, Davidrajuh R. Physics-Based Swab and Surge Simulations and the Machine Learning Modeling of Field Telemetry Swab Datasets. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(18):10252. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810252

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohammad, Amir, Mesfin Belayneh, and Reggie Davidrajuh. 2023. "Physics-Based Swab and Surge Simulations and the Machine Learning Modeling of Field Telemetry Swab Datasets" Applied Sciences 13, no. 18: 10252. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810252

APA Style

Mohammad, A., Belayneh, M., & Davidrajuh, R. (2023). Physics-Based Swab and Surge Simulations and the Machine Learning Modeling of Field Telemetry Swab Datasets. Applied Sciences, 13(18), 10252. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810252

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop