Next Article in Journal
Structured Light Patterns Work Like a Hologram
Next Article in Special Issue
Locating Two-Level Systems in a Superconducting Xmon Qubit
Previous Article in Journal
Building XAI-Based Agents for IoT Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fast Reset Protocol for Superconducting Transmon Qubits
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Optimized Unconventional Geometric Gates in Superconducting Circuits

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 4041; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13064041
by Yueheng Liu and Xinding Zhang *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 4041; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13064041
Submission received: 6 March 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 22 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Superconducting Quantum Computing and Devices)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors develop an alternative approach to designing geometric gates and apply the technique to superconducting qubits. The problem is well motivated and the manuscript is clearly written. The results on CP gates are especially interesting. Their predicted fidelities are close to Google's values (of course this also depends on their decoherence model). 

I can recommend publication after the authors do a direct comparison with Google's CZ gate protocol (also based on third level repulsion). See "Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance" (doi:10.1038/nature13171). Namely, compare the geometric and Google approaches, both optimized with in the presence of the same decoherence model. This would be very valuable to the superconducting qubit literature.

Author Response

Please see the attachment for the specific reply.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Quantum computing becomes more and more important as a new research study.  Reliable and effective computational techniques are important.
  This paper is valuable for the readers: Sec. 1 is a good review including up to date information. Sec.2 includes clear description of the method, etc.

There are several unclear places for me: 2.2. at the first line; f(0). f_i(0) ? After Eq.10; Rabi or Rabbi ?  The 3rd line in Sec.5; avoiding avoiding (Why doubled ? Want to stress?)

Author Response

Please see the attachment for the specific reply.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Geometric phases are known for their invariance with respect to gauge

transformation. Quantum computation using geometric phases is thereby

considered to inherit such robustness.  In this paper the authors propose an

approach to realize  generalized unconventional geometric computation,

which can help to construct  higher-fidelity gates. I think the paper is interesting and valuable. The manuscript is also well prepared.  I would recommend the publication of this manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment for the specific reply.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop