Next Article in Journal
Employing FGP-3D, a Fully Gated and Anchored Methodology, to Identify Skeleton-Based Action Recognition
Next Article in Special Issue
Active Low-Frequency Noise Control Implementing Genetic Algorithm on Mode Coupling of a Compound Source
Previous Article in Journal
Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy of Glioma Patient Blood Plasma: Diagnosis and Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Attention-Based Residual Neural Network for Efficient Noise Suppression in Signal Processing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/app13095436
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Novel Active Noise Control Method Based on Variational Mode Decomposition and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(9), 5436; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095436
by Xiaobei Liang 1, Jinyong Yao 2, Lei Luo 3,*, Weifang Zhang 2 and Yanrong Wang 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Luca Fredianelli
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(9), 5436; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095436
Submission received: 24 February 2023 / Revised: 22 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Active Vibration and Noise Control)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting paper. The idea is nice and it is well presented. I am concerned a bit about to narrow scope of the presentation in the paper. The proposed algorithm is compared to LMS and RLS, which are very basic algorithms. It would be justified to address ANC with soft computing methods, e.g. fuzzy, neural, etc. This is a minor comment, and a paragraph about that would suffice to make the paper more complete. 

Author Response

The point-by-point response to the reviewer’s comments is attached as a Word below.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The submitted paper is dealing with a relevant and actual topic and is really a good paper. I found nothing more to report than just a couple minor comment. It is really a good work from the authors from my personal point of view.

 

Line 37 “Dragomiretskiy in 2014,” needs the reference behind.

Axes and labels are missing in some figures.

Author Response

The point-by-point response to the reviewer’s comments is attached as a Word below.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Abstract, in the last sentence we just see "superior ANC effect". Here would be better to write something like how much is it better, 5%, 10% etc... that comes as a very important conclusion from the paper. "Superior" is not the right word for scientific papers.

In the first part, somewhere before or after paper organization would be good to write the novelty of the paper. It can come as a separate section or subsection. 

Section 3. - Numerical simulation. Did you conduct some kind of tests in a real or laboratory environment? I just see four simulation schemes in Figure 6. Two different shapes with and without obstacle. This approach is validated with numerical simulation and not with real tests. From my point of view this is the main problem of the paper. I would suggest to conduct experiments to do real validation of "Novel Active Noise Control Method". I think that for this level of Journal, we need paper with all the elements. 

 

Author Response

The point-by-point response to the reviewer’s comments is attached as a Word below.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Authors improved the paper, and it is ready for publishing. 

Back to TopTop